Manual Irrigation Power Channels
Manual Irrigation Power Channels
Manual Irrigation Power Channels
OF INDIA
MANUAL ON
IRRIGATION AND POWER CHANNELS
NEW DELHI
MARCH 1984
MANUAL ON
IRRIGATION AND POWER CHANNELS
Prepared by
CENTRAL
\NATER COMMISSION
Published
by
during
The Manual gives the broad guidelines for planning and design of a
system. A satisfactory and successful design depends upon the individual skill
and practical experience of a Designer and should cater to the site requirement. I hope this Manual will be of assistance to the engineers in the field of
Irrigation and Power in planning and design of canal systems.
I would like to bring on record the useful work done by Shri P.C.
Lau, Deputy Director, Shri P. Sen, former Director, and Shri R.P. Malhotra,
Director (B.C.D.-II) in preparation of this Manual. Contributions of Shri R.
Rangachari, Member (JRC): Shri K. Madhavan, Chief Engineer (Designs)
and Shri N.K. Agrawal, former Member (D&R) in the preparation of this
Manual are acknowledged.
Comments and suggestions for improvement of the Manual are welcome.
PRIT AM SINGH
Chairman
Central fVater Commission
Chapter
II
Chapter
III
Appendix
Chapter
Appendix
I
IV
II
Chapter
Chapter
VI
Cd
Coefficient of Discharge
Cumecs
C.B.L.
C.V.R.
F
F.S.L.
F.S.D.
G.L.
Ground Level
LP.
Inspection Path
Coefficient of Rugosity
Discharge in cumecs
Longitudinal
S.R.
Service Road
V
Va
Introduction
1.1 India is potentially one of the richest agricultural countries in the world.
The total arable land in
India is estimated to be 147 million hectares which is
the third largest in the world, ranking behind only the
U.S.S.R.
with 225 million hectares and the U.S.A.
with 194 million hectares.
This is owing to the fact
that the proportion of arable land to total geographical area is the highest in India being 45 percent
against
10 percent for U.S. S. R. and 25 percent for
U.S.A.
Irrigation
has been practised
in India from very
early times from wells, tanks, inundation canals and
small channels.
Major projects were built by the
British starting in the middle of the 19th Century, and
the rate of development though, moderate, was steady.
1.2 Irrigation is defined as the natural
or artificial application
of water to soil for the purpose of
supplying the moisture essential or beneficial to plant
growth.
Water is tlOrmally supplied to the plants by nature
through the agency of rain. A second agency is through
the flood waters of rivers which spread and inundate
large areas during the flood season and recede back
leaving the land well irrigated for cultivation of a crop
during the dry season.
These natural
processes are
usefully
supplemented
by canals
to maximise the
benefits to cultivators.
1.3 This manual is an attempt to cover broad
guidelines, keeping in view the practices recommended
by ISl in their various published Cod.es and the practices adopted by reputed Agencies and Organisations
like U.S.B.R.,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
etc.,
which may be of some help to the designers.
The
Irrigation distribution
system consists of various components
like regulation
structures,
cross drainage
structures, bridges, lined or unlined channel sections,
etc. In this manual, only the channcI part has been
dealt in detail.
1.4 The source of all water used for irrigation
is
'precipitation',
i.e., the water received on the earth
from the atmosphere
in the form of rain, snow and
hail etc. The prOC~3Sof utill3ation of this water involves th~ construction
of engineering works of appre-
(2)
(3)
for the growing population of the country has automatically brought it to the forefront. Even so, some of
tae salient advantages of development of irrigation are
recapitulated below:
Often the requirements of the neighbouring industry or the Thermal Power Stations for cooling etc.
could also bl; met with from these channels.
(iv) Topography
The seepage from the canal system, if constructed, may raise the water-table
still further
by making the area prone to waterlogging.
(b)
Uncertainty of Demand:
In areas where the
water-table
is high, irrigation demand may be
slack.
At the same time, such areas may be
well adopted
to development
of cash crops
which cannot be grown without irrigation.
(c)
SOH,'/J
in the Area
of Existing
in the
(a)
(b)
Since it may not be possible to meet the demand of irrigation during low supplies/closures
from the sources, i.e., river/reservoir,
the pcssibility of conjunctive
use of ground water to
meet the demand of sowing, transplant ation/
maturing of crops during Jaw supplies/closure
should be examined.
This will, on ncrasirn
reduce the capacity of channels and s~ve in
construction
cost and encourage the optimum
utilisation
of available water resources.
This
will incidently
keep the rise of sub-soil water
level within permissible
limit and give more
~ime for maintenance
of distribution system,
(ii) Rainfall
of the Area
Intelligent, hardworking
cultivators
would adapt
themselves to irrigated cultivation, avail of its advantages and make economical, efficient use of water.
The
reverse would be the case if they are otherwise.
This
can make all the difference to the success or failure of
an irrigation project.
After reconnaissance,
all the information
gathered
should be carefully analysed.
If the result indicates
feasibility
of the project, more detailed surveys and
collection of data would then be carried out.
The distribution
system should be economical from
considerations
of capital investment
and cost of annual maintenance.
It should provide adequate irrigation facilities to the areas under the command of channel. The following broad principles may be considered
for the layout of distribution
system.
(i)
In an undulating country a straight alignment of canal for any length may not be possible as it would involve heavy filling and cutting
resulting in both heavy capital and maintenance
investments.
The economically shortest route
is to be kept in view which can be attained by
an alignment
(which could be arrived at by
trial and error) between:
(a)
Water should be taken directly as far as possible to the area of the command, subject to pratical considerations
of lnaximum
permissible
height of the bank filling and cutting.
The
alignment
of the canals will have to be that
which would result in the greatest saving of
both captial and maintenance
l'Osts and also
in the loss of head and transmission
losses.
(b) A straight
line from head to tail in a
rolling country involves heavy filling and
deep cutting.
In a flat country saving in
loss of head throughthe
straight alignment
is an important
factor.
The transmission
losses assume more significance in case of
unlined canals than in case of lined canals.
(ii)
off-take
canals
channels,
and
A contour
channel is carried
on an alignment
which conforms generally
to that of the contours of
the country traversed by giving, such slope along its
length as is necessary to produce the required velocity
of flow. As the line of flow of surface drainage
is at
right angles to the ground contours such a channel
cuts across th~ natural drainage
lines of the country
traversed.
Such an alignment
does not imply an
exact conformation
with the contours of the natural
ground, as it is usual, when traversing
undulating
country
which displays any marked natural features
to shorten the line by crossing ridges in deeper cutting
and valleys in higher bank than the general average.
Thus in such country a contour channel would be of
short~r length than the corresponding
falling contour
laid out along the ground surface without taking any
short cuts.
Discharge
m3{sec
Radii Min.
m
Curves in unlined
canals
shall be as gentle as
possible as they lead to disturbance
of flow and a
tendency to silt on the inside and to scour on the outside of the curve. The curves are usually, simple circular curves. At the velocities, permissible
in unlined
channels, the super-elevation
of water surface is very
small. The situation will be different in lined channels
where higher vel0cities are permissible.
In any reach
of a lined channel, with hyper-critical
velocity, curves
are best avoided; in case they have got to be provided,
the water surface profile must be very carefully worked
out.
As per I.S.I. recommendations,
radii
of curves
should be usually 10 to 15 times the bed width subject
to minimum given in Table 1.
Discharge
m3{sec
Radii
Min.
& above
1500
900
Below 80 to 30
1000
760
Below 30 to 15
600
600
Below 15 to 3
300
Below 140 to 70
450
Below
150
Below
300
80
3 to 0.3
70 to 40
90
channels
further modification
super-elevation
shall
be
Impervious
clay loam
(iv)
2.70 to
3.60
Sandy loam
3.60 to
5.20
5.20 to
6.10
7.00 to
8.80
Gravelly
Porous
sandy soils
gravelly soil
roads
are:
or main-
pf share-
(iii) 'Warabandi'
shareholders
number
troubles
arise particularly
of small holdings.
of small sized outlets
for
are:
silt soil or
not
to cross
The disadvantages
The disadvantages
Seepage Loss
Cumecs/million
m20fwetted
Perimeter
should not
or less than
8.80 to 10.70
silting
up
(il') G:eater number of outlets cause trouble in distnbutJOn of water and regime of the channel.
10.70 to 21.30
seepage losses may be
m2 of wetted perimeter.
0.0751'0
course
the
to a minor
1 in 5000
0.30m
Plotting of L-Section
(ii) Regulating
of structures
will
be
structures
(iii) Communication
structures/bridges.
Su per passage
(2)
Drainage
(3)
Canal Syphon
syphon
0.15m
O.SOm
(4)
Level crossing
Min. workirg
0.60m
(5)
Aqueduct.
types
PLANNING
AND INVESTIGATIONS
ways of crossing
of the
regulator
of distributaries/minors
Escapes
Silt ejectors.
This structure
dissipates
filling reach is minimised.
the
excess
for regulating
the
COMMAND
STATEMENT
OF
-----sL.
R.D. OF AN OFF
CRITICAL
DISTANCE
NO.
TAKE OR
POINT IN N.S.
CRITICAL
FPOlI
LOSS OF NEAD
FIELD
__
---_ ..
5
--1------_._-_.
tQOLUMN $-71
(COLUMN3~5.j
61
HEAD OF
OUTLET
HEAD
OUTl.ET
POINT TO
OUTLET
WORKING
WATEflLEVEL
AT HEAD OF
DEPTH
------
._-----------------_.\
PLATE
~.u. I
-----------------l
-------_._-------------
.Q.APACITY
DESIGN STATEMENT
..QE
."._-~
SL.
BELOW
NO.
KM. R.O.OF
AN
GROSS
AREAlaA.1
OR OUTLET IHECT.1
OFF TAKE
GROSS
C""''''''''''EO
CULTURAL
COMMANDED
AREA
AREA
IG.C.A.I
tHECT.1
ICC.A.1
IHECT.1
AREA
RABI
IHEcn
TO
Bf. IRRIGATED
SUGAR
OUTLET
OISCHARGE
FACTOR
OULEr
DISCHARGE
IN CUMECS
LOSSES
IN REACH
TOTAL
l.OSSES
TOTAL
DISCHARGE
RICE
10
II
------
_.
...HANNEL
VELOGI;~--r-"
DIMENSIONS
IN MlSEC.
BED SlON:
BED WIDTH
12
13
FULL
FULL
SUPf'LY
DEPTH
SUPPLY
LEVEL
14
15
--
DESIGN
BED LEVEL
D"CHAflGt:
LACEy'S',
OR n
,
HT. OF
18
19
"
-_._-,
.PLATE NO.2:
CAPACITY
-"-
REMAlll(S
-20-t-------
BANK
--_ ...17
16
-- ._-
(')
G>
~
Z
l;
"'Z
~
...
'"
'0
"
!"'
!"
r
..,
!n
(')
c
-;
-;
Z
G>
<
"'
'"
~3.z.92.15
92.65
150
9259
300
9248
3:
"'Ql
..,
''"" G>is"
~
'"" ''"" '"
'"
Cl
(')
(:)
r
r
(')
~
'"
...z'"
1135
450
OL
600
CS 750
00
10:50
1200
7
91.59
1350
..-
l/
iEs
I
RS
1500
II
Acl
I
I
S-
91.72
1650
1800
91.4El 91.16
1950
91.41
9/.10
91.50
2100
91.15
91.04
91.54
2250
92.85
ES
RX
C'l
;U
VRS
l>
0
iTi
z
-i
CS
<
(
"
rI)
UI
0
0
OL
CS
S
VRS
VRS CS
6
VRB OL
VRS
ES
1)
;u:c::
l>
I'T1
UI()()():I:;U
i-x~0in~in:'n~~~
al:TJ
~
I'T1
Z
()
r
I
(j)
()~
l>
-l
Zo
~Z
wOUI
00
o
'TI
:s:
l>
Z
-;
"
1.255
!
c:
0
CS
SW
1\
1.435
'"
m
(J)
of Open Channels
channel
ex-
Q=AxV
= Discharge in cumecs
A = Cross-sectional
area in sq m
V = Mea~ velocity of flow in m/sec
Q
(a) Kutter's
CV
R.S
in m
Formula
0.00155
1
23 ,t. --S-+N
C=-------.
1+ (23+ _0.0~155 ) :
by I.S.I.
are
Kutter's
Formula
= --1
fi.2/3
81/2
II
'n' are
related
by
R1/6
mean radius
This is a practical
and fundamental
formula for
the un!form flow of water in open channels and it is
the ?asls of all modern velocity formulae.
Since co~fficler:rt 'c' represents the retarding influences various
InvestIgators have determined its value on the basis of
expernnents
and observed
data.
The most widely
used values of 'c' are given by :
.
V
IS
Hydraulic
87
1+~
V~
and hydraulic
mean
'n' and Kutter's "N"
very close for practi-
Value of 'N'
Normal
Earth, straight
1.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
0.016
0.018
0.022
0.022
0.018
0.022
0.025
0.027
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.033
0.023
0.025
0.030
0.030
0.025
0.030
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.035
0.030
0.033
0.035
0.040
0.035
0.040
0040
0.050
0.025
0.035
0.028
0.050
0.033
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.045
0.080
0.080
0.050
0.070
0.100
0.120
0.080
0.110
0.140
2.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(I)
3.
and uniform
No vegetation
Grass, some weeds
Dense weeds or aquatic plants in deep channels
Earth bottom and rubble sides
Stony bottom and weedy ban ks
Cobble bottom and clear sides
Dragline
(a)
(b)
excavated
or dredged
No Vegetation
Light brush on banks
4.
0.06
neat brickwork
0.16
Smooth
plaster,
planed
Timber,
ashlar,
Rubble
inasonry
0'46
Plaster,
0.85
design of stable channel depends largely upon the experience and judgement of t~e de~igner.
An attempt
has, therefore, been made by InvestIgators to obtain
a
critical velocity offlow at which there will be neither
scouring nor silting.
.F.ormulae that have been proposed for stable condItIOns of the channel express
either a relationship
between the C.V. and depth of
flow or the relationships
between the width of channel
and depth of flow. The various formulae available for
design of stable channels are given below:
Earth channels
in usual conditions
1.30
(a) Kennedy
Earth channels
in bad conditions
1.75
The values of
in Plate 6.
"e"
Formula
based on the
obser-
Yo "'"
Critical
velocity
in mjsec
anG NOI1,sco~dl1~)
(Non.siltin~
Critical
V = 0.84111 DO'64
Sands c()arser than the standard were assigned values
of m from 1.1 to 1.2 and those finer from 0.9 to 0.8.
Kennedy made no correlation
between wate~ surface
slope of regime chanmls and the mean. velOCity. or the
vertical depth.
He relied on Kutter s equatIOn to
give slopes to the channels.
The values of Va for different
Plate No.7
The following equations
vations at other places:
=
V =
V =
V
depths
were
are shown
(v) Determine
( ::
the
critical
velocity
) taking V as calculated
ratio
'm'
and Va as read.
obtained
0.391
DO'55
Godavari
0.53
DO'6E
Krishna
0.567
DO'57
Lower Chenab
0.283
DO'73
Egyptian
(vi)
in
by obser-
Delta
Western Delta
Canal
Canals
with
(i)
(ifi)
0.55 D00f4
velocity ratio
(ii)
. (i)
.. (it)
A=Area
of the channel section
V=Velocity
('fflow in m/sec.
f=Lacey's
silt factor.
Lacey's regime flow equation is
V=10.8 R 2j3 S 1/3
in m
... (iii)
P is wetted perimeter
in m
in cumecs
Q is discharge
f5/3
S=3316Q
1.35
J/~
1j6
V=0.4382(Qj2)
R=0.47
of other impor~ant
which are gtven
( ].
yf2
q2 )1 1
( 7- / .
ql/l
A=2.28jTJ2
Silt Factor 'f'
According to Lacey, the silt factor' f' will b~ d~pendent on the average size of boundary ~atenalll1
the channel and its density.
Its value vanes as the
square root of the mean diameter of the particles.
f=-1.76Y
n1r
m,.=average
size of particles
in mm.
Selection
of Method
(i) For channels taking off from reservoirs carrying silt free water and flowing through
hard
soils or disintegrated
or fresh rock, it appears
quite desirable from the point of view of economy to design the channel for as high a
velocity as the soil can withstand
without
erosion, consistent
with the slope av~ilable
from the command
point of view and economies of the channel section.
Too steep a slope
should normally
be avoided.
Lacey's design
is generally not applicable
to design of such
channels.
The permissible
velocity should
first be fixed and the channel section should
be determined
from Chezy's
formula with
Kutter's
value of C & N. The Kennedy
or
Garrets' diagrams
may be used to facilitate
designs and avoid calculations
by trial and
error method.
of Design
Bed Width-Depth
Ratio
CVR
(Cumecs)
28317
28.317
28.317
28.317
0.0225
0.0225
0.0225
0.0225
Lo
1.0
1.0
1.0
Slope
per
1000
Bed
width
m
F.S.
Depth
m
0.22
0.20
0.18
0.16
9.75
12.04
16.15
28.96
2.53
2.30
1.98
1.42
The same difficulty has been experienced in channels taking off from reservoirs and carryil~g relatively
silt free water.
The CVR is not the dommant
factor
in such cases and the channel may be design~d for
permissible velocity which the soil can stand without
scouring.
According to Ellis the best channel section for the
same cross-section
area and slope, posses. water at
maximum
velocity
with greatest
hydrau!Jc
!!1ean
radius.
For any trapezoidal channel of fixed se.ctlOnal
area (A), if',' is the ratio of horizontal to vertical. of
the side slopes and '8' is the length of th~ two SIde
slopes. per unit depth which equals 2
+ 1 and
'M' is the ratio of bed width to depth.
3.6
Considering
purely from the stand point of hydraulics of a channel, the most efficient cross sections
is the one which with a given slope and area has the
maximum carrying capacity.
Chezy's formula indicates that for a given water surface slope, the velocity
and consequently,
the discharging
capacity
of the
section is maximum
when the hydraulic mean radius
(R) is maximum.
The lraximum R is given by the
circular section.
Since channel in earth have usually
trapezoidal
section,
maximum
R is given by half
hexagonal
described about the semi circle with its
centre at the water surface.
Such a section however,
requires great depths
for larger
discharges.
1he
velocity induced
in such section may also become so
great as to cause erosion of the sides and scour in the
bed of the channel.
The non-scouring mean velocities
as recommended
by various
authorities
including
CWPRS, Pune are given below:
(1)
V,-
Hydraulic
Mean Radius
(R)
. jM",
= 'V
M'!-
.;-
v A
soils.
3.7
to 0.9 m/sec.
0.9
1.0
to 1.1 m/sec.
1.5
to 1.8 m/sec.
to 1.5 m/sec.
to 7.6 m/sec.
Side Slopes
adopted
depend upon the
the channel is to be eXCaand fheight of embankment
the following conditions, in
(a)
Sudden
draw down
conditio!ls
for inner
slopes.
(b) The canal running full with plenty of rainfaIl
for outer slopes.
The minimum slopes usually all owed arc given in
Table V
].
to 2:1 (cutting)
to 3:1 (embankment)
to 15:1 (cutting)
(embankment)
to 2:1
to 1.5:1
to 0.5: 1
by consider-
Soil Characteristics.
Size of canal and its locations.
Hydraulic gradient.
Water surface fluctuations.
Percolation.
Service road requirements.
F=
where,
F=
C=
1)=
1
X
J C.1J
1.812
\j
Free board in metres.
Coefficient.
Depth of water in canal in metres.
0.15 to 75
7.5 to 10.0
10.0 to 15.0
15.0 to 30.0
30 and above.
Width differel?t than those recommended above may
be D.sed when Justified by speCIfic conditions
For
distrIbutary can~ls .carrying less than 1.5 cume~s and
minor cana~s, It IS generally 110t economical to Construct a serVIce road on top of bank as thi~ u
11
. q
. I
sua y
Ie ulres more matefla s than theexcavatiol1
provd
.
dIes.
I n Suc h cases, serv~ce
roa may be provided on natural
ground surface adjacent to the bank.
Howeve
th
'd'
r,
e
Impor t ance 0 f prO'll Ing adequate service roads where
they are needed should always be kept in view.
~he banks sh.ould invariably
cover the hydraulic
gradIent. The WIdth of the non-inspection
bank should
be checked to see that Cover for hydraulic grad'
t'
provided.
'Ien
IS
Berm is a horizontal
space initially left at ground
le~el . beltweb~n ~he ftoe of bank and excavation.
The
pnnclpa
0 jectlves
or providing berms are:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d) To provide
canal.
a SCOpe for
future
direct
widening
of
(e)
(f)
practice
is recommended:
s of unlined
canal
are
shown
of design of unlined
canal
Example
Example
Design of Channel
Ku tter formulae.
section
by
Kennedy,
Chczy &
DATA
II
Design of channel
section
using Lacey's formulae.
DATA
= 30 cumecs
S = 1/8000
Side Slope t
DES'GN
DESIGN
Against
=
=
30 cumecs
1.0
Side slopes = t: 1
0.02
from
plate
No.
from
12 works out
=7.5
Let the depth of chaJ1]~el = 2.15 ill
b = 2.15x7.5
= 16.125 m = say 16.0 m
Area
(l6+1.08)x2.15=36.72
m2
Pw
= 20.81 m
16+4.81
A
---=-----=176
Pw
23 +()0155
1+ ( --S1
=23+-0:-020
1+(2H-.00155
9.vR.
;;:
0.55 D 0.64
0.58 x 2.15'64
0.90 m/sec
~:~~
Q.9~ O,K.
Pw2-6.944
RPw
--------3-:-472"--------
30.84 cumecs
-5836
(
Example
= 26.43 m
30'
2.236 D
26.43 -- 2.236 X 1.64 = 22.76 say 22.8
f 5/3
=
1_.
_
-33T6- Ql;6
3316x(30)1/6
1
=---' -3316XT:""i6
PlV
RS
Critical velocity
126
55.8
V = 36.72 0.840
== V
X 8000
V-Q
4.825
= Pw
".1-1\-
85.40
1:f3-
(+ )1/3
23+50+ 12.40
1 + (23+ 1240) x 0.02
= 4.825
x 80(iO)~-
-i~5-3-2-
047
-------
) X ~
y'
(}9:- yf3
PlV or P
(~~_l?..?-)
+000155
= 1.46 m
36.72
20.81
---~--- +
23 +
0.47
i.e. 17 cm/km
-9:{02-
r/
=0.77m/sec.
III
for
30 cumecs discharge
DATA
Q=
30 cumecs
Side slope = t : 1
Longitudinal
slope = 1/8000 or 12.5
N =
From
B =
D =
0.02
Garrett's
16 m
2.15 m
Vo = 0.9
diagram
111jScC.
cm/l<:rn.
6
z
I1J
..J
II..
MEAN
MEAN
COEFFICIENTS
n OF ROUGHNESS
RAD-R
RAD.R
METRES .009 .010 .011 .012 .013 .015 .017 .020 .025 .030 .035 .040 METRES
.025
.050
I-
:>
a:: .
O
w
Il.
0
1
.2
NO
oln
0%
0:
w
0..
0
..J
l/l
52
63
75
87
99
104
III
2
4
10
30
118
124
130
135
57
69
25
32
40
48
57
71
100 90
83 77
107 98 90 84
113 104 97 90
119 110 102 96
124 114 107 100
61
67
74
79
85
90
45
55
66
17
88
93
40
48
59
69
80
84
35
43
53
62
72
77
31
39
48
21
27
34
41
49
53
59
65
71
77
82
17
21
27
34
41
12
16
21
26
32
9
12
16
21
26
45
50
56
62
67
73
36
40
46
51
29
33
39
44
8
10
13
17
22
25
28
34
39
57
62
50
55
45
50
6
8
II
15
19
2225
30
35
40
46
.025
050
.1
.2
4
6
I
2
4
10
30
MEAN
RADR
:i
lt!)
.,
LLJ
..J
II..
0
I-
:>
Q:O
wo
0..0
0-
-z
00-
II
0..
2
4
0
..J
Vl
10
30
'---
t
t!)
z
w
..J
II..
0
I-
z:>
a::
~g
.,.In
ON
o!:
..
0-
w
0..
0
..J
l/l
.025
.050
-I
2
3
4
6
I
2
4
6
10
30
55
66
78
90
47
58
68
80
41
51
61
70
37
45
55
64
33
40
50
59
27
33
42
49
95
99
105
III
117
123
125
85
89
94
100
106
76
80
85
90
97
III
102
114 105
70
73
78
83
89
95
97
63
67
72
77
83
88
91
28
35
13
17
21
27
54
57
62
67
73
78
81
22
28
35
42
47
50
54
59
65
70
72
39
42
45
50
56
61
63
93
83
75
98
87
79
17
23
14
18
7
9
12
15
30
32
36
40
45
50
53
10
13
17
22
24
27
30
33
38
43
46
21
22
25
28
34
38
40
17
20
22
25
30
34
36
66
55
48
43
39 10
70
60
52
48
43 30
8
II
025
050
1
2
'3
4
6
2
4
6
34
42
50
60
64
67
72
77
83
87
90
28
34
42
50
54
58
62
67
72
77
80
23
29
36
43
47
50
54
59
64
69
71
18
23
30
35
39
42
46
50
55
60
.62
13
17
22
27
30
33
36
40
45
50
52
92
96
82
86
73
77
64
68
54
58
50
43
59
52
70
63
72
80
77
86
89 81
94 85
III
100 90
116 106 97
121 III
102
124 113 104
MEAN
RADR
OF ROUGHNESS
38
47
56
65
70
74
78
83
90
94
97
.025 57
050 69
80
2
90
96
'3
4
100
.6
104
I;
COEFFICIENTS
II
13
17
22
25
27
30
33
38
42
45
47
51
.035 .040
9
II
14
18
21
23
25
28
33
37
40
42
46
METRES
7
025
9
050
12
16
'2
18
'3
19
4
'6
22
25
I
29
2
33 4
36 6
38 10
42 30
.,
------,-,MEAN
,---
- -
Mt::AN
COEFFICIENTS rI OF ROUmiNESS
RAO.R
r.U::TRE 5009
:r.
....
.02 5
.05
(!)
Z
IJJ
..J
IJ..
.1
.2
.3
.4
...
::>
ffio
0.0
.6
Q
11')0
NO
I-50
OV
Oz
0-
0-
,.
II
3
4
~
o
10
i~
_I
lfl
20
?P -
29
38
50
25
33
44
'1'2
82
63 56
72 64
89 79 71
88 80
99
\00
III
90
121 109 100
12'/ 115 106
136 124 114
142 1:10 120
149 137 12'7
158 145 135
!64 151 141
16'7 15.'5145
\72 160 150
.025 40
52
65
1
.2
79
87
3
93
4
.6 102
"
I.
III
'5
2;
6
118
123
129
133
136
IQ
143
15
141
150
20
3Q
--~_.
.011 .012
34
44
58
.05
JO
0
0
0
t\I
.010
(j
152
.Ol~
30
40
20
27
36
17
22
14
19
26
51
46
58
64
72
83
92
96
106
53
C
22
III
119
127
133
137
142
59
67
77
85
91
99
104
III
120
26'
30
39
45
50
57
67
74
80
87
93
100
108
114
34
39
44
50
59
66
71
78
83
90
62
67
74
83
51
51
62
69
77
90
83
73
56
C
II
16
21
28
33
C
9
12
16
21
25
37
42
50
29
33
40
57 46
61 50
68 56
73
61
.0~101.f1~li
:(j~()
C
6
8
II
C
5
13
\5
23
28
33
38
15
11
2D
23
28
33
42
37'
48
52
58
66
42
46
C
7
9
13
18
21
80 61
88 75
94 81 7'l.
98 85 75
103 90 81
7
9
25
29
32
37
24
31
40
94 87 77
100 93 83
104 97 86
109 102 91
1\4 107 96
118 III . 10{)
120 113 103
123 116 105
65
13
18
24
3'0
35
38
43
50
55
59
68
74 64
77 68
8? 72
87 78
91 82
94 84
97 87
10
13
46
59
53
7
9
5
7
12
16
27
30
34
40
45
48
18
10
13
16
21
18
24
28
35
40
43
47
52
21
25
28
31
35
38
42
47
56
51
58
G2
53
57
56
61
66
70
72
76
53
58
62
64
68
.6
I
(50
51
18
23 "'::1'9
53
.3
4
41
1\
14
22
25
28
33
38
41
45
49
.2
2
:3
4
64 59
108
62
'74 68
53
G()EFr-!C~ENTS
.011
.(Wl
35
44
31
.eml
i1
OF OOUGHf\lESS
.015 .Oi'f
.020 .025
MEAN
RA[).R
.030 .055
.040
METRE~
:l!:
.025
.05
.1
17
20
20 '"I
26 22
:>4 29
43 37
"8 42
53 46
59 52
67 59
34
44
.020_ ,..025
98
1()4
126
130 118 108
135 123 113
._.
35
30
44
39
57 50
69 62
77 . 69
83 74
90
82
100 90
10'1 97
III 102
117 108
\
121 11'2
126 117
131 122
135 126
137 128
140 131
.015 .017
RADn
MEnlES
fJll';tlN
RAD.r~
10
15
20
:30
--._-
mm
.05
1
2
'3
4
6
I.
15
2
3
4
6
10
15
20
30
ll!l
.025
w
..J
.05
.1
lL
0
I-
zo
'='0
0::0
wO
':::~
0 __
d
0
II
IJJ
d.
9If)
---
47
59
72
'2
~4
-3
91
97
104
4
.6
40
50
62
74
81
86
92
100
105
109
116
1\9
55
66
73
77
83
40
50
60
66
70
76
83
8e:
28
35
45
22 19
29 25
?J;7 32
54
46
51
60
64
70
55
60
77 67
90
i'
B2 72H, 117
96
120
100 92 35 15
2
107 99 92 32
4
128
131
110 102 96 85
G
135 123 1/4 106 100 89
10
137 126 ilG 109 102 92
15
00
141 12:9 120 112
106 ~5
____
._"_-'==-_.__
-=--~~_'_"'_=_.
III
39
44
48
53
59
64
67
n
31
83
37
___
15
II
20
15
19
25
28
26
'32
37
40
45
50
54
57
64
67
71
"/4
9
12
16
20
23
25
29
7
10
13
17
19
21
25
35
40 33 28
44 34 32
47 40 34
53 46 40
43
56 49
60 53 4'7
63 55 50
31
78
67
....-c- _"_,-
59
54
_____
6
8
.O2~
II
-(
14
17
18
.05
-3
21
4
'6
25
28
30
I
1'5
2
36
39
43
6
10
46
15
50
30
HYDRAULIC
MEAN DEPTH(R)
\IN METERS.)
ASHLAR
MASONRY.
AND CA-
TION
NALS
PITCHED
WITH
STONE.
-----
M=0.1085
0.10
f----------
73
-------
0.15
23 -
36
.------..
_'.- ..-.--. --
75
62
OONDITION.
l"'
~017
--~t-~;------I----~~R
"::54 ~"::35
M=O,29
60
EARTH OANALS
EXCEPTIONALLY
ROUGH.
40
----1-
27
-,
- -
----
'
I ---
20
16
BAZIN'S FORMULA:-
--------------
30
C~ 1:57.6
1.81+. M
22
V'lr
18
~:-:.....
~~f~
~-~~~~
~~
~:-'~~:
.
-~-:~!.....-:-:----21
-------
---------.---l-I
55
43
34
45
36
1.00
-- ----"------
60
82
..
---
--
'
I
27
28
58
e2
33
------1------! I
56
----J---------
41
47
--
"_.
1.50
83
63
51
2.00
84
66
55
2.50
84
68
57
3.00
85
69
59
3.50
85
70
60
"---. -
..
30
----------
----------, i ----------i
PLATE NO6:
VALUES OF C FROM
BAZIN'S
FORMULA
DEPTH
0.00
000
0.00
010
.122
~~~ZO
.163
0.~225
0.25
030
.254
0.3;;-'
.2DO
FROM
0'40
0.306
TO 3.95METRES
0.45
10'50
0 330
! 0.55
'353
.375!
_.
060
397
0'65
.417
0'70
.437
0'75
0'80
.457
476
1'0
---
o.~?
.~~~-~18
2'0
I (}857
3'0
11'110
882
1154
..~--
'896
.911
1158
.667
,662
949
963
1'192
1205
698
~;;;;-I
~750
,989)',0021"014
"
1215
L'748
1,226
.761
'Tl3
~801
0'85
495
~0514 I
O~
'816
0830
0844
'027
1039
1051
1063
1075
1260
1'271
1.282
1'292
1303
~~'~
I'
1237
1,248
1,314
1'325
I
I
[,
I
'1
SLOPE
...,
...,
Ul
IN eM./ KM.
UI
0
(JI
(1\
CD
0
21
<DCJ)
0
z
"
0
0.05
0.02
N
N
(Jl
0.03
0;04
0.05
"1J
0.20
0.07'5
r
~
rn
0
CD
0.10
0
CJ)
0.125
:z:
fo,e
J>
::0 0.150
0.20
G)
z
;0
;0
-i..
rrl
rn
(j)
-0
Q
::0
:t:&
0.75
3:
0.025
0.0275
0.030
I
0-35
0'.0
045
0'50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0;>0
0.75
300
1.00
1.250
1.500
I
I
5.00
L:750
I
"-
:-
ii
I
I
P
~
01
9
N
N
--.j
--_.
r'
9
Q-J
lj)
{;'l
OJ
.t>
P
.Il>
0
(J)
__
r.1l
"0
0<
9
QI
r,.'!
vi
:""1
.-
9
();I
(JI
-"j
U1
-----------
~}\
9
'-l"
UI
Ul
t..'1
en
l:l
-...!
0
.:,,:
N
'",
Oi:l
lJ!
-----~
9
c:a
N
N
0>
Cl)
l)l
a:;
>0
CO
10
l\l
0)
C1'
10
(11
C7l
CD
ci
10
It'
CO
l\l
l\l
It'
(;
It'
~
0
I(:
0,
""
It'
C\i
r:::
0
It"
"
~
0,
CO
It'
""CO
0
10
l\l
..
(11
"7
0
,
It'
CD
10
I{\
It'
It'
"t
0
I
q
2~.OO
2.e.00
"
"-
240(;
22.00
20.00
19.00
18.00
17.00
16.00
15.00
/4.00
0::
/3-00
(9
12.00
/1.00
OEO'Ol
10.(;0
9.50
9.00
8.50
!:L;'O"l\ .
ozo:~
8.00
<{
![>
~
u
lLJ
W
~
I~
~
lLJ
7.50
2C'OJ
<{
7.00
0
C\i
G.50
~IO'O
~
lr
:r:
U
(f)
6.00
"1."10
5.00
415
450
4.2'5
400
3.7'5
'3,,"10
3.2"1
:'l.00
Ie
l\l
C\;
~
':>
II
Z
0
C7l
0
ct'
0
,....
CO
0
It'
0
c<'
"t
'W>!
/'W:>
0
l\l
NI 3d01S
::>
0::
0::
<{
(9
(J)
cS
z
W
~
....J
U-
-l
I
en
CD
Ol
GO
r-.
0
::~~
I"
JZ
1'3
1'4
Jo
o
o
t--
_-
0.8
06
r----
I I III
-r--
-y
----I-
~I
UJ
a.
J..!.:9
--
-U:.S.
--
(/)
~--r-r--r~5
I-
0::
a.
Z
_
---r----r-- '---Ft -_ -~-t--_-- - ---r-=:---...
-~1-",,--- - --
0::
__
-_
I___ --_
1--_-
008
r--..u4
UJ
a.
(/)
o'OZ
O'OJ
i\)
p op-:w
UI
':"'<00
=+:
r---ti
--
1"-_
f--
r---
---------W!!i
.
.
DISCHARGE
-II
: r ~
6 0 00
---
--<..
--...L
-t--_-- ~."--'
--'8
-1----_
"'..
11\
'--r-- ~-.J_lQ,4
I
I"~
-.:....~6
I-';-+-i
'
"'-r--. _
f..---- __
r----;--
---'
I
Ul
I---- -_
r---r--
w
0
-1__
f==~:::;~~~A'5
I'\)
..i
--- --r--._
' I
..::- I"-r--::::::-
___
I
!
I
:::::-I"-.
as
006
---=:::::r---~:::-~
=+=
=-
0-1
I I
~ 0
0
0
0
IN CUM EC
0
0
I
CD
0
0
0
0
0
/'4
/'0
og
z \c
U5
(/)
o~
z:E
-0
'
"
,
~........
"
~,\\
,\
I'. \\~~
~f\\",
~"
!~',
'I'
~I
\/'\
":
I
I
~\
.0
\"
1\\",'
\I
0
il
\\'
"
,\
"~\
\\ \\ '\.x
,-/\.\
\X \
1\)'/\
V /\/ ,(
'~\\~O~
X '. \ X
V"I,
y
I V \,
~\
\, ~
X I
r /~
! ;!
'!
~~O
l&J w_1-a: ~6~
Il&J d
6
~
\ \\ \,
:xf->,'O.A
o ~,
ci,~
Iv'\ \ \ \\
jI
,l)( \ \
\,X
I'l
CD
~o
II
I
\'
\\\\\1\\
'\
WI
0)
\
\
\ \
I\ \
\ \ \ \I \\
;
I
I
~10
I
ID
6,
I'
':"0
~.,
v..:.
O::~1--
(/)o::u
">-I~Lt
w WUI--
f!/P
I'l~
(Xl
U(/)-l
:SO(/)
\1\1\
\ \ \\\
j/ ~
0.
0"'
:z:
I- WwO
I
I
~o::~lL.0:
A \ x\ '.\\'.\
~
X
\"\
~\\~
J \
00..:..
I')
I \
Z~<O
f/
0::::>
~\'.\~(.f!)
V/
~~
(J)U
y~'.>"'(,..,
\);-
~w
,\'9~o
'\..K\; , 0'&
/~~/\\~"'\
,,
~
~
0:0
'\ I"",..
"/' /v
~\
/1 \,/ \. ):-A"\ \~\\'
\ \ \ , ,\,\\ \'~
\
\,,\,
l&J
Q
lO
\
'Y-'\'.
" "'I\\'J.~
,:...~\
~\
\ X
/\
\
1-:
?t
\ \ \ ~\ \ \'\
y~'\
\
\
>0:: ,.I
,~. \ ~
,
.-AP-:\', ' , l\ ,
z...J
a:<t
"\ \\ ,
,\,,,
z~
~~
0
Gl
~~l~
\.-~:-,,\\\\
\\*~\
'( ~\ \ \~ \r--\
\ \ ~\\\
\
l&.l)
00::
l&J
~
~
0
z
w
I--l
6
lO
~
0
a..
1'6
6>
,z
U)
"
/'0
~ 8:1
0.5
Ot<:
.~ ~ ~ g g 8
~ 0
- 03
U
o
...J
/'0
0.9
0.70.8
0.6
z 8.
-
('3
oOQ
-..
0
.~ e
z'!4
V=(QfJ6
i40
I
REGI ME .DISCHARG~
DIAGRAM
AND VELOCITY
_,
-- --
- ...
1------ .- ~
~-
_.'--
._ ..
._.
.-
..-
_.~._-_.
----_."
.-
-- _.
.
. _.
--
_._-
--
.._-
.-
_._.-
----_ .
~-
_.
.
.... __ .
--
f- .._.
.... -.
---
---
.-- --
--
..
_ ......
-~
_._-
-.- ..-
---
'-r- v
---
-:
_.
./'"
_._--
--' ..
"
....
_-
."._---
----
0.2
20
30 .0 : D
70
KIO
DEPTH
200
00
.RATIO
>a:
--l
BANK
BElt.. 5001+" _,
3
z D ~ +--r;
i::>
/MIN.300
I-
MAX.60
SPOIL1
BANK
o
ID
!1
_a.ROAD
--i 5001'') ~
150 Z
300 WIDE GAPS TO BE l.EFT AT~
EVERY75 MIN. SPOIL BANKS'ON
BOTH SIDES.
IF D>3M LEDGES ARE PROVIDED
AT 3M INTERVALS.
M..r-I50
ZV~50
MIN.,300
+I { I-<-
I+~~
N.S. BETWEEN BED AND F.S.L.
DIGGING MORE THAN
BALANCING DEPTH
8~
IDO
BERM .
300
=-=-=~-:::-.,:t t
~.
l-50gp
a:
0,
,~
,g
INsPECTION
ROAD
~
.J
<t
Z
(5
ZOO) 300
DOWEL
t-t--I- f+
~ N.S.
~
o
N.S.
Reduction
of seepage losses resulting
in a
saving of water which can be utilised for additional irrigation.
(b)
Pr~vention
of
water-logging
seepage to watcr table.
(c)
Reduction
in area of cross-ser:tions
(and
thereby,
saving ia land) due to increase in
permissible velocity by reduction
ill the value
of rugosity and availing of steep:r slop(;, where
available.
(d)
Improven,ent
of
existing ,:hannel~.
by
discharging
reducing
capacity
of
In order to
establish
necessity of lining in a
certain area, it is necessary to quantify
the contribution of each of the
factors
mentioned
above for
assessing
the
overall
economy
achieved by
lining.
4.2
Types of Lining
Exposed linings
include all linings exposed to
abrasion
erosion
and
deterioration
effect of the
flowing water, operation and maintenance
equipment
and other hazards.
Such linings are constructed
of
cement concrete,
asphaltic
materials
bricks, and
boulders/stones.
Although,
the initial cost of these
linings
is generally
high,
the reinforced cement
concrete
linings being the costliest, they are usually
recommended
for use only where structural safety is
the prime consideration.
(a)
Cement Concrete
(i)
Elimination
of silting problems,
inherent
unlined canals, due to higher veloci ties.
(j)
Increase in available head for power generation as a flatter gradient can be provided in
power channels
due to reduced
value of
'N'.
(k)
A distinct
disadvantage
of concrete lining is its
lack of (ixtensipility.
which reS\llts in frequent crack
(e)
Improvement
of operational
(j)
Prevention
of weed growth.
(g)
Reduction
of maintenance
Reduction
in evaporation
tion
losses
due to
area.
efficiency.
cost.
and transportareduced
exposed
in
due to
contraction
taking place on account of
temperature
changes drying, shrinkage and settlement
of subgraue.
It is also likely to be damaged by
alkaline
water.
Cement
concrete
lining without
reinforcement
may be
damaged
due to excessive
external water pressure. However, reinforced concrete
lining can withstand
the external water pressur~ but
at a very
high cost.
Where
unexpected water
pressures
are encountered,
unreinforced
lining will
crack more easily than the reinforced lining and will
relieve
the pressure
thereby reducing the area of
damage.
(e)
Brick Lining
(f)
Earth Linings
Thick compacted
earth lining may prove to be
economical where suitable material for construction
is
available at site
The lining is durable and can withstand considerable external hydrostatic
pressure
and
can be provided over expansive clays also .. Bentonite
has shown considerable
promise for use as a good
lining material.
Bentonite containing large percentage
of montmorillonite,
is characterised
by hi gh water
absorption accompanied by swelling and imperviousness. It can be used as 5.0 em thick membrane
covered by protective blanket or as a mixed in place
layer of soil bentonite well compacted.
(h)
Boulder Lining
Pre-cast
Concrete Lining
Buried Membrane
Linings
and experience
are the major factors affecting the
economy
and selection of suitable lining material.
Adoption of a particular type of lining material will
require consideration
of all these factors and hence it
is not possible to recommend anyone type oflining
suitable for all conditions.
However, a broad indication can be given for the type of lining that may be
considered
for various sizes of canals.
Following
classifications
of channels may be made for deciding
the type of lining for a particular channel.
(a) Channels with Bed Width upto 3.0 m
U)
(b) Pre-fabricated
asphaltic
membrane
linings:
These ready made membranes
are used in smaller
channels or in relatively short reaches of large canals,
where the use o'f sprayed-in-place
linings is costlier on
account of the requirement of special equipment
and
skilled personnel.
Such linings are fabricated from
low cost material
of adequate
water tightness and
durability.
They are relatively thin and light and can
be transported
to long distances, stored in hot weather
and placed at low temperatures.
(c) Plastic film and synthetic
rubber membrane
lining:
These linings using polyvinyl and polythelene
plastic and butyl coated fabrics have been tried experimentally
on a limited scale. Out of the various
types tested so far, polyvinyl and polythdene
appear
to be the best. A protective cover of earth or earth and
gravel- is provided.
Plastic film can be manufactured
in any convenient size. More over being light it can
be transported
and handled easily. Synthetic
rubber
also h3s found use in canal lining although it is highly
durable,
it undergoes
mechanical
damage
when
expo~ed.
plastic or alkathene
lining
adequate earth/tile cover may be adoped
stable channels.
4.3
Considerations
for Selection
with
for
(b)
25 to 50 mm thick bentonite
membrane
lining
with earth cover may be considered
wherever
economical.
'
Channels
8.0 m
(i)
with
Bed
Lining of single
preferred.
Widths
burnt
clay
between
tile
3.0 and
should
be
coarse
within
lining
the
burnt
membrane
lining protected
by earth
l;D-.situ concrete
lining or precast
concrete
lImng may be preferred for reducing the seepage losses.
Flow Formula
and Velocities
i.e.,
n
canals. Experiments in various research institutes have
been conducted
by taking
actual observations
for
finding the value of rugosity coefficient on lined canals.
Some values of' n' for various surfaces as recommended by ISI are given in Table VI.
TABLE
VI
Small Channels
Side Slopes
Angle IjJ
(iii) Sectional
Formed, no finish/PCC
or slabs
Trovel/Float
finish
Gunited finish
(b)
(c)
below
tiles
0.018-0.020
0.015-0.017
0.018-0.022
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
III
Note:
0.019-0.021
0.018-0.020
0.020-0.025
0.015-0.017
0.020-0.030
0.018-0.020
1.785 dZ
V=_l
R2j3 S
n
(vii) Discharge Q=A X V
(vi)
Velocity
1.25:1
38 40'
1.925 d2
3.85 d
0.5 d
1/S
Channels
II
Area (A)
2. For Large
Concrete with surface as indicated
1:1
45
HydraUlic
mean depth
R~/3
R=:
SIj2
xV
II.
of assumption.
considerations:
(i)
(ii)
or due to subsequent
malfunctioning
will lead to
gradual accumulation
of water wi thin the contact
space and cause failure of lining.
Drainage
arrangements have, therefore, to be designed such that excess
hydrostatic
pressures
are eliminated.
The necessity
for provision of filter behind the lining is also stressed
from the considerations
of inhibiting the movement of
fine material from the subgrade following
drawdown
which, if not guarded against, may lead to progressive
formation of ca vities resulting in subsidence
of the
lining. The various considerations
governing the design
of drainage arrangements
and pressure release valves
for different water-table conditions are given below:
(a)
side for
and Pressure
4.10.1
(b)
Water-Table
between Canal Bed and F.S.L.:
Whether the bankfill is composed offreedraining or clayey material,
the soil behind the
lining will remain submerged to the elevation
of the water-table.
In case of lowering or
emptying of the canal, lining will be subjected
to hydrostatic
pressu're due to water-table and
also drawdown
pressures arising from drain-.
age of the backfill above the elevation
of
water-table.
Drainage
must,
therefore,
be
provided to help in reducing such pressures to
safe limits.
(c)
Release Arrangements
Wafer-Table
below Canal Bed: If the watertable is below canal bed and the bank-fill is
free-draining,
there will be no time lag in the
dissipation
of drawdown pore pressures in the
backfill as such no drainage arrangement
is
necessary in such a condition.
4.10.2
Selection
of Drainage
Arrangements
below the lining on th3 sides, The adequacy of v.uious drainage arrangem~nts can be determined on the
model.
In case of high ,vater-table, the lining will be subjected to uplift pressure corresponding
to head difference irrespective
of the type of subgrade.
In case of
the lining being subjected to drawdown, however, the
excess pressure will depend upon the rate of drawdown
and the drainage characteristics
of the sub grade.
In
most cases it should be possible to adjust the drawdown by suitably restricting
the rate of drawdown
to an extent that
there is little pressure lag.
In
such cases, drainage may be provided as a precautionary measure.
A broad categorisation
based on Cassagrande's classification
in?i~atiJlg the ran,ge ?f free
draining
and poorly dra1l11l1g subgrade
IS gIven as
below:
(i)
(ii)
Free draining
Poorly draining
Permeability
greater than 1O-4cm/sfc
Permeability
less than 10-4 cm/sec
and greater than 10-6 cm/sec
Permeability less than 10-6 cm/sec
Provision of Dwarf
Regulator
(c)
Clay
Silt
Gravel
1520%
15-20% or more
and sand 60-70%
300 eumecs
N = 0.018
S
1
10000'
- --Pw
206.19
46.35--
R
Equating
0.'715
4.45 m
0.715
y/
Q
S
20 cumccs
1
= 10 000
=
n
= 0.014
Side slope = 1.25 : 1
R2/3
Sl/2
R2f3
..
1
(10,000)
----
l~
(1)
_2 __0
_
1.925 x d'
(-f- }2/3
20
1925 x d2
X
As R
d/2
1.925 d2=20
From above
d = 3.25 m
Hence O.K.
Example II
Design of Distributary
_Q_ =
Also V =
1
1
X 4.452/3
X
10000
0.018
1
1
--~--X 2.71 X-ioo-0018
00271
= 1.51 m/see
.0180
206.19 X 1.51 X 311 cumecs
R2f3
1
0.014
0.715 R2/3
5.7m)
_1_
n
= d
data:-
Q = 300 cumecs
N = 0.018
Side slope = J .25 : 1
Longitudinal
slope = 1: 10000
From the curves
Assuming a bed with of 30 m
Depth required is 5.20 m
Velocity of flow would be around
1.44 m/sec.
data
with
NATURAL
(A)
i:TODETEiiMlNE
R
READ BD WIDTH AND DEPTH AGAINST DISCHARGE MULTIPLIED
N," 0.015
;i=0.833
0.016
'0.020
0.889
1.111
BYN/N
0.022
INeO'016'
'
1.222
"f'
2. TO DETER MINE
READ FOR THE DISCHARGE CALCULATED ABOVE
N1 0.~15
0.016
0.020
0.022
(N/N,)
'.44 1.266
0.810
0.669
3.
TO DETERMINE V.
0.016
tN/NI )=1.200.
(8)
1.125
CALCULATE
ABOVE &
0.020
0.022
0.900
0.818
MULTIPLY IT.
NINI
IN:OO.OIBI
READ
WHERE sl'STHE
2. TO DETERMINE
NEW
3.
TO DETERMINE
1/2
DlsOIARGE
DIVIDeD
BY 15(15)
SLOPE.
1/2
V.
2
& MULTIPLY IT. IN/NI'
BY (s,/SI
1/2
IS/51 1/2
112
1/2
~ It
OF PRESSURE
RELIEF VALVE
"
...
..
.. ..
..
..
..; :',A:-':
....
'.'.'~l';' :
, "
",
'.
!>
I>
"
"
5CM.'7"
,;
/A
"~to
I>
.. ..... .. ....
I>
/A
"
,J.\'
GRAVEL
015
COARSE
SAND
FINE
.. p
SAND
7.5",",
015
0.6m ..
mm.
GRAVEL
0/5'"
COARSE
SAND 015
FINE SAND
NOTE :---
THE GRADED
FILTER
SHALL
BE DESIGNED
THERE IS NO LOSS
OF SOIL
PARTICLES.
THE GRADATION
7.5mm.
.=
015
0.6
='0.09mm.
Mm.-
15,~M"
85cM.
~
t OF PRESSURE
I RELIEF VALVE
A
"
...
..
GRAVEL
015
COARSE
SAND
fiNE
SAND
7.5m",
DI5
DI5
0,8m . ,
THE GRADED
FILTER
SHALL
BE DESIGNED
IN SUCH
151. SIZE
OF VARIOUS
LAYERS
A WAY. THAT
THERE IS
NO LOSS
OF SOIL
PARTICLES,
TYPICAL,
"
"
IS,CM ..
..
"
A
DI50:
7.5mm.
SAND
D15!=
THE GRADATION
"
GRAVEL
t>
COARSE
NOTE :---
..
" .. ""
" " "
FINE SAND
""
"A
P
"b
'" 6
..
DI5
0,8 Mm.
=0,09mm.
85cM.
:0..
o.oe
~~:-~',
~.
VC~~<..,
8..
~.
NOTE:---THE
GRADED ILTER SHALL 8f DESIGNED IN SUCH A WAY THAT THERE IS NO LOSS OF SOIL PARTICLES. THE
GRADATION CUR\/! OF SED MATERIAL SHOULD 8E OBTAINED FROM THE SIEVE ANALYSIS. THE 151. SIZE lD15'
01' THE L.AY!R IAI SHOULD BE AT LEAST fOUR TIMES AS LARGE AS 15 J( SIZE OF THE SOIL AND LESS THAN
fOUR T1MES 85 PERCENT SIll!; DS5 OF' THE SOIL. DESIGN OF THE OTHER LAYER SHOULD BE DESIGNED IN A
SIMILAR WAY TILL THE REOUIR!MENT OF THE. FILTER OPENING IS MET.
.
THE 15:.1SIZE OF VARIOUS LAYER SHOWN ARE ONLY rYPICAL.
Power Channels
5.2
Planning
Design
Cross-Section
The cross-section
~tc., ar~ designed
Hydraulic
section,
slope of the channel and
velocity of flow in the channel;
(b)
Amount
(c)
(d)
Criteria
surges in
surges in
in a power
lated from
or load acceptance;
of load;
hma",
v'i<.'i+2Kh
(a)
For abrupt
(b)
~+V";h
2
where,
hm." = maximum
K
V
of load rejection
h
.
'?
5.6
5.7
should
preferably
be lined since:
(a)
It is hydraulically
more efficient thus ensuring
smaller cross-~ection, relatively flatter slope for
the same discharge
capacity
resulting
in
economy.
(b)
Loss of water
minimised.
(c)
(d)
Cost of operation
and
(e)
Weed growth
due to
seepage
or leakage is
and maintenance
is lower,
is mioimised.
Drawdown
Sediment Control
is fixed in consultation
with
of desilting arrangements,
the
TABLE VII
Safe Particle Size for generating
Head
(m)
Below
100
100 to 300
Above 300
5.9
units.
Largest
Particle
Size
(mm)
0.5
0.2
0.1
Trash Rack
Construction,
Roads
6.1.4
Boundary
Stones
Boundary
stones are fixed at the land boundary
every 250 m apart and at every change of land width.
These are considered
very necessary
to avoid any
encroachment
in Government
land.
On main canals
and branches,
distance marks are often provided on
both banks, fixed in dowels with top of concrete block
flush with its top.
On small channels these are ftxed
on one side only along the service or inspection
road.
6.2 Maintenance
of Channels
The importance
of proper maintenance
of canal
system is well understood
by the field engineers and
needs hardly any emphasis.
For proper maintenance
it is necessary
that
regular
hydraulic
surveys
comprising
longitudinal
sections
and cross-sections,
measurement
of discharge
and corresponding
water
levels attained
in different reaches etc., be carried
out.
Stress should also be laid on the importance of
eradication of weeds,
jungle clearance,
berm, cutling
etc. It should be obligatory
for the fteld engineers
that the longitudinal
sections
and cross-sections at
suitable intervals of each channel may be examined
once in five
years
and
revised,
if
necessary.
Inspection
roads along the canals shotlld be kept in
fit condition
and canal
banks to be maintained
properly
for the removal of rain water away from
the canals.
6.2.1 Maintenance
The unliped
silt entry.
The
of Unlined Channels
channels
position
Hydraulic
functioning
of channel.
(ii)
Equitable
di,tribution
of irrigation
(iii)
Judicious
trimming
supplies.
silt clearance,
weed clearance
and jungle clearance.
of the inspection
be
berm
road for
below:
6.2.1.1
Hydraulic Functioning of a Channel: The
perfectly developed "regime
theory" for the design
and proper
maintenance
of unlined. canals
has
won worldwide recognition.
Canals which have run
for long periods may have alrea~y attai~ed
final
regime and there J?ay ~e n? dl.fficulty In their
operation.
But th1s regll1:-e IS ~I~turbed when a
channel
is remodelled.
ThIS pOSitIOn IS further
aggravated
when
their full supply
discharge
is
increased.
In the case of channels where regime is yet to be
attained, regular watch need be kept by conducti~g
hydraulic surveys at regular llltervais.
~he hydrauhc
survey of each channel s~ould be carne~ out every
alternate year and should melude observatIOns of bed
levels, berm levels, full supply levels, natural surface
levels crest ievels, and working heads of flumes, falls
reguI~tors
and sizes of outlets.
If a channel shows
repeated
tendency to silt up or scour then .suitable
remedial
measures
be undertaken
to bnng
the
channel back to the regime conditions.
The rules adopted
for the rcgulation
of river
supplies at head works if not judicious, also affect the
hydraulic functioning of barrage ponds and t~e .can.als
off taking therefrom.
The keen demand of IrngatJOn
water compeils field engineers to overlook the maintenance aspect and the flushing of sediment de\?osits in
the undersluice
pockets/ponds
which IS vital for
efficient operation
of can~ls, i.s seldo.m resorted to as
the water required for flushing IS conSidered a waste.
Thus, review of regulation
rules is very essential for
proper maintenance of canals.
Another aspect in this regard is inadequate
pation of energy downstream of falls ~n unlined
which causes bed scour and bank erosIOn.
dissicanals
6.2.1.2 Equitable Distribution of Irrigation Supplies: The irrigation system i~ requi.red to be properly
operated and maintained
w1th a view to iecure opt!-
6.2.1.3
Judicious
Silt and
Weed
Clearance:
(a) Silt
Clearance:
As
regards silt clearance,
the
prevalent
instructions
provide
that silt
clearance
u pto theoretical
bed
level and
sides
as indicated
by bed bars is an important
aspect
of maintenance
of the canal
system.
It, however,
provides
only temporary
relief towards restoring
regime of an irrigation
channel.
Since irrigation
channels are required to be non-scouri ng and nonsilting, the cause of silting has to be investigated and
.remedial measures undertaken.
(b) Weed Growth and its Removal:
Weed growth
reduces the carrying capacity of irrigation
channel
and deteriorates
its regime and hydraulic
function.
The
decrease
in
the
carrying
capacity
is
mainly
due
to two accounts,
decrease
in the
cross-sectional
area,
and increase in the frictional
resistance to flow.
Some of the important factors which encourage the
growth of weeds in a canal system are: temperature
of water and its chemical compositions,
velocities of
flow, deposition of silt 011 the bed, depth of water a'lld
reduction of sunlight.
The types of control
(i)
Regulation
drying.
(ii) Chemical
may be divided
measures,
alternate
into:
wetting
and
measures.
(iii) Mechanical
(iv)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(l1)
(12)
(13)
(13)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(I 8)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
Lined Canals
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
I.S.
1.S.
1.S.
1.S.
1.S.
1,S.
(32)
C.B.J.P.
5968 1970
7112-1973
7916-1975
4558-1968
5331-1969
9451-1980
Publication
on Operation
and Maintenance
Soil.
of Canal Systems.