Terrorism: Terrorism, in Its Broadest Sense, Is Defined As The Use or Threatened Use of
Terrorism: Terrorism, in Its Broadest Sense, Is Defined As The Use or Threatened Use of
Terrorism: Terrorism, in Its Broadest Sense, Is Defined As The Use or Threatened Use of
Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is defined as the use or threatened use of violence (terror) in
order to achieve a political, religious, or ideological aim. It is classified as fourth-generation
warfare and as a violent crime. In modern times, terrorism is considered a major threat to
society and therefore illegal under anti-terrorism laws in most jurisdictions. It is also
considered a war crime under the laws of war when used to target non-combatants, such as
civilians, neutral military personnel, or enemy prisoners of war.[1]
A broad array of political organizations have practiced terrorism to further their objectives. It
has been practiced by both right-wing and left-wing political organizations, nationalist
groups, religious groups, revolutionaries, and ruling governments.[2] The symbolism of
terrorism can exploit human fear to help achieve these goals.[3]
The definition of terrorism has proven controversial. Various legal systems and government
agencies use different definitions of terrorism in their national legislation. Moreover, the
international community has been slow to formulate a universally agreed, legally binding
definition of this crime. These difficulties arise from the fact that the term "terrorism" is
politically and emotionally charged.[13] In this regard, Angus Martyn, briefing the Australian
Parliament, stated,
The international community has never succeeded in developing an accepted comprehensive
definition of terrorism. During the 1970s and 1980s, the United Nations attempts to define the
term floundered mainly due to differences of opinion between various members about the use
of violence in the context of conflicts over national liberation and self-determination.[14]
These divergences have made it impossible for the United Nations to conclude a
Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism that incorporates a single, allencompassing, legally binding, criminal law definition of terrorism.[15] The international
community has adopted a series of sectoral conventions that define and criminalize various
types of terrorist activities.
Since 1994, the United Nations General Assembly has repeatedly condemned terrorist acts
using the following political description of terrorism:
Criminal acts intended or calculated to provoke a state of terror in the public, a group of
persons or particular persons for political purposes are in any circumstance unjustifiable,
whatever the considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious
or any other nature that may be invoked to justify them.[16]
U.S. Code Title 22 Chapter 38, Section 2656f(d) defines terrorism as: "Premeditated,
politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational
groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience."[17]
Bruce Hoffman, a scholar, has noted:
It is not only individual agencies within the same governmental apparatus that cannot agree
on a single definition of terrorism. Experts and other long-established scholars in the field are
equally incapable of reaching a consensus. In the first edition of his magisterial survey,
'Political Terrorism: A Research Guide,' Alex Schmid devoted more than a hundred pages to
examining more than a hundred different definitions of terrorism in an effort to discover a
broadly acceptable, reasonably comprehensive explication of the word. Four years and a
second edition later, Schmid was no closer to the goal of his quest, conceding in the first
sentence of the revised volume that the "search for an adequate definition is still on". Walter
Laqueur despaired of defining terrorism in both editions of his monumental work on the
subject, maintaining that it is neither possible to do so nor worthwhile to make the attempt.[18]