Nego

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Syllabus in Negotiable Instruments Law

Dean Lope E. Feble

I. Governing Law Act No. 2031 (enacted on Feb. 3, 1911 to take effect 90 days after its publication in the Official
Gazette.
II. Nature, Purpose and Function of Negotiable Instruments
Sec. 60, RA 7653
SECTION 60. Legal Character. Checks representing demand deposits do not have legal tender power and their
acceptance in the payment of debts, both public and private, is at the option of the creditor: Provided, however, That a
check which has been cleared and credited to the account of the creditor shall be equivalent to a delivery to the creditor of
cash in an amount equal to the amount credited to his account.

Traders Royal Bank vs. CA, 269 SCRA 15 (1997)

Eduque vs. Ocampo 86 Phil. 216


Dr. Eduque
III. Kinds of Negotiable Instruments
Secs. 184, 126 and 185, in relation to Sec. 1, NIL
Sec. 184 Check, defined. - A check is a bill of exchange drawn on a bank payable on demand. Except as
herein otherwise provided, the provisions of this Act applicable to a bill of exchange payable on demand
apply to a check.
Moran vs. CA, 230 SCRA, 799
Concept of Checks and Banking
Check is a bill of exchange drawn on a bank payable on demand. Thus, a check is a written order addressed to a
bank or persons carrying on the business of banking, by a party having money in their hands, requesting them to
pay on presentment, to a person named therein or to bearer or order, a named sum of money.
Fixed savings and current deposits of money in banks and similar institutions shall be governed by the provisions
concerning simple loan. In other words, the relationship between the bank and the depositor is that of a debtor and
creditor. By virtue of the contract of deposit between the banker and its depositor, the banker agrees to pay checks
drawn by the depositor provided that said depositor has money in the hands of the bank.
Hence, where the bank possesses funds of a depositor, it is bound to honor his checks to the extent of the amount
of his deposits. The failure of a bank to pay the check of a merchant or a trader, when the deposit is sufficient,
entitles the drawer to substantial damages without any proof of actual
damages.
A check, as distinguished from an ordinary bill of exchange, is supposed to be drawn against a previous deposit of
funds for it is ordinarily intended for immediately payment.
Citytrust Banking Corp. vs. CA, 196 SCRA 553
Phil. Educ. Co., Inc. vs. Soriano, 39 SCRA 587
Metrobank vs. CA, 194 SCRA, 169
IV. Requisites of Negotiability of Negotiable Instruments
Sec. 1 - 4, 8 - 10, NIL; Art. 1179, Civil Code
Inciong vs. CA, 257 SCRA 578
Rep. Planters Bank vs. CA, 216 SCRA 738
Jimenez vs. Bucoy, 103 Phil. 40
Ponce vs. CA, 90 SCRA 533; Kalalo vs. Luz, 34 SCRA 337

Rivera vs. Sps. Chua, G.R. No. 184458, Jan. 14, 2015
PNB vs. Rodriguez, G.R. No. 170325, Sept. 26, 2008
HSBC vs. CIR, G.R. No. 166018, June 4, 2014
V. Matters which does not affect negotiability/ Rules of Construction on Negotiable Instruments
Secs. 5 7, 11, 12, 17, 24, 73, NIL
VI. Parties to Negotiable Instruments; Capacities
a. Promissory Notes
1. Maker
2. Payee
3. Indorser/s
b. Bill of Exchange
1.
2.
3.
4.

Drawer
Drawee
Payee
Indorser

VII. Consideration in Negotiable Instruments


Secs. 24 29, NIL

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy