Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 94 views

    168 Scra 405

    Uploaded by

    Ray Adrian P. Ditona
    Spouses Ricardo and Leonor Ladrido owned Lot No. 7511, while Spouses Rosendo and Ana Te owned Lot No. 7340, which they later sold to Angelica and Celso Viajar. However, during a survey it was found that Ricardo Ladrido was occupying Lot No. 7340. Viajar sued Ladrido to return the land. The courts ruled in favor of Ladrido, finding that the river bed between the lots had shifted, placing Lot No. 7340 in Ladrido's possession. The issue was whether the Torrens system protects riparian owners from changes in adjoining waterways. The Supreme Court ruled no, as accretion from natural changes in rivers

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    168 Scra 405

    Uploaded by

    Ray Adrian P. Ditona
    94 views1 page
    Spouses Ricardo and Leonor Ladrido owned Lot No. 7511, while Spouses Rosendo and Ana Te owned Lot No. 7340, which they later sold to Angelica and Celso Viajar. However, during a survey it was found that Ricardo Ladrido was occupying Lot No. 7340. Viajar sued Ladrido to return the land. The courts ruled in favor of Ladrido, finding that the river bed between the lots had shifted, placing Lot No. 7340 in Ladrido's possession. The issue was whether the Torrens system protects riparian owners from changes in adjoining waterways. The Supreme Court ruled no, as accretion from natural changes in rivers

    Original Description:

    168 SCRA 405

    Original Title

    168 SCRA 405

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Spouses Ricardo and Leonor Ladrido owned Lot No. 7511, while Spouses Rosendo and Ana Te owned Lot No. 7340, which they later sold to Angelica and Celso Viajar. However, during a survey it was found that Ricardo Ladrido was occupying Lot No. 7340. Viajar sued Ladrido to return the land. The courts ruled in favor of Ladrido, finding that the river bed between the lots had shifted, placing Lot No. 7340 in Ladrido's possession. The issue was whether the Torrens system protects riparian owners from changes in adjoining waterways. The Supreme Court ruled no, as accretion from natural changes in rivers

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    94 views1 page

    168 Scra 405

    Uploaded by

    Ray Adrian P. Ditona
    Spouses Ricardo and Leonor Ladrido owned Lot No. 7511, while Spouses Rosendo and Ana Te owned Lot No. 7340, which they later sold to Angelica and Celso Viajar. However, during a survey it was found that Ricardo Ladrido was occupying Lot No. 7340. Viajar sued Ladrido to return the land. The courts ruled in favor of Ladrido, finding that the river bed between the lots had shifted, placing Lot No. 7340 in Ladrido's possession. The issue was whether the Torrens system protects riparian owners from changes in adjoining waterways. The Supreme Court ruled no, as accretion from natural changes in rivers

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Locator: G.R. No.

    L-77294 (168 SCRA 405)


    Title: Angelica Viajar & Celso Viajar vs. Court of Appeals, Leonor P.
    Ladrido, et. Al.
    Date Promulgated: December 12, 1988
    Statement of Facts
    Spouses Ricardo and Leonor Ladrido were owners of Lot No.
    7511 which was registered in their names.
    Spouses Rosendo and Ana Te were also registered owners of a
    parcel of land described in their title as Lot No. 7340. Spouses Te
    sold said lot to Angelica and and Celso Viajar, and a title was issued
    under the names of the latter pair.
    During a relocation survey, it was found out that the land (Lot No.
    7340) was occupied by Ricardo Ladrido. Viajar demanded its return
    but Ladrido refused. Viajar then insituted a civil action with the CFI
    against Ladrido.
    During the pre-trial show, at the time of the cadastral survey, Lot
    No. 7511 and Lot No. 7340 were separated by the Suague River; that
    the former river bed of Suage River was in the possession of the
    defendants; and that the plaintiffs have never been in actual physical
    possession of Lot No. 7340.
    CFI ruled in favor of the defendants declaring them as owners. CA
    affirmed with the CFI ruling.
    Issue(s)
    Does the Torrens System protect the riparian owner against
    diminution of the area of his registered land through gradual changes
    in the course of an adjoining stream?
    Ruling
    No, registration under the Torrens System does not protect the
    riparian owner. Art. 366 of the Old Civil Code provides " accretions which
    the banks or rivers may gradually receive from the effects of the current of the waters
    becomes the property of the owners of the lands adjoining the banks." Accretions of that
    character are natural incidents to land bordering on running streams and are not affected
    by the registration laws.

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy