Scribd
Upload
758 views4 pages

Arficulafion Test Form: Templin - Darley Tests of Articulation

This document appears to be an articulation test form from the Templin-Darley Tests of Articulation. It contains tables and sections to analyze a subject's production of consonants, consonant clusters, vowels, and diphthongs. The form also allows the examiner to compare the subject's performance to norms, analyze error patterns, and note other factors that could be related to misarticulations.

Uploaded by

Josh Paz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
758 views4 pages

Arficulafion Test Form: Templin - Darley Tests of Articulation

This document appears to be an articulation test form from the Templin-Darley Tests of Articulation. It contains tables and sections to analyze a subject's production of consonants, consonant clusters, vowels, and diphthongs. The form also allows the examiner to compare the subject's performance to norms, analyze error patterns, and note other factors that could be related to misarticulations.

Uploaded by

Josh Paz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

l'

a
I

m
r o w A

TEMPLIN.DARLEY TESTSOF ARTICULATION

ArficulafionTest Form
Copyrlght 1968 by The Universityof lowa. All rights reserved.
The Universityof lowa, lowa City, lowa52242

DateExaminer

Age-

sex

Consonant
Singles
Initial

Screening Test

4
g

Final

Non.Syllabic

Syllabic

Other Clusters

1 . 3

26. br-

51.m

52. m

84. -Inr

94. -a,m

120.-6k

2. Ju

27. tr_

53. n

54. n

85. -nq

95. -en

l2l. -mp

:. r(f )

28. dr -

s s .I

86. -po

96.-ep

122.-nL

+. r (m)

D. kr-

56.

s7.p

87. -50'

97. -Et

1 2 3 .- n d

s .l ( r )

30. gr _

58.

se.b

88. -ts

98.-ed

r24. -kt

e .v ( l )

3l.fr-

60.

6 1 .t

89. -de

99.-ek

l 2 s .- p t

z .e ( r )

32' or-

62. d

es. d

90. -ker

t00. -sf

e.0(m)

33. gr_

64. k

6s.k

el. -ga

lol.-st! _

e .e ( f )

34. pl _

66. g

67. g

gz. -6e

-edg 102.

r o .6 ( t )

3 s .k l -

68. I

93. - tr

rr.6(m)

3 6 .g l -

r z .6 ( r )

3 7 .f r -

r s .z ( t )

3 8 .s m -

1 4 t. ( t )

39.sn-

r s .t ( m )

og.sp_

1 6 .t ( f )

4 1 .s t -

17.3(m)

42. sk-

r8.J(r)

4 3 .s l -

le.J(m)

4 4 .s w -

20.tt(t)_

45.rw-

zt.t!(m)-

46.kw-

2 2 . t \ ( f) _

69. f

72. s

Additional
Vowels

r 2 7 .I
128.I

70. f

129.e

Additional
I clusters

7 1 .v

1 2 6 .- t t

--

130.e

?3. s

r 0 3 .b l -

74. z

l 0 a .- p t

7s.3

l o s .- b t

l12.-lk

76. h

1 0 6 -. t t

l 1 3 -. l f

77. w

1 0 7 .- k l

rr4.-lg

l l 0 .- l p
l3l.A

ll1.-1t
132.e
133a
.
134.c
1 3 5 u.

73. d3

Other Pressure
Consonants

1 0 8 .- q I

10e.-s I

136u
.

7e. k(m) _

Additional
s clusters
I 1 5 .- s m

137.ov

4 7 .s P t - _

80. g(m) _

16.-st

138.au

2 3 . d O ( i )_

48.spr

81.f (m) _

I17.-Sl'.

139.e I

24.d5(m) _

4e.s tr -

82. s (m) -

I 1 8 .- k s

1 4 0 o. r

25.p r -

5 0 .skr -

83. z(m) --

1 1 9 -. m p s - -

l 4 l .c t

Diphthongs

ANALYSISSHEET
l. Comparisonwith Norms
Score Norm
l-a. DiagnosticTest (Table l):
l-b. ScreeningTest (Table 2):
Cut-off Score(Table 3):
l{.

Initial and Final ConsonantSingles(Table 4):


Initial Consonants(Table 5):
Final Consonants(Table 6):
How many of the 24 consonantswere defectivein at leastone position?

ld.

Iowa PressureArticulation Test (Table 8):

l*.

lrl and./a/ Clusters(Table 9):

l-f.

lll and/l/ Clusters(Table l0):

l-g. /s/ Clusters(Table I l):


l-h. Miscellaneous
Clusters(Table l2):
l-i.

Vowels(Table l3):

l-j.

Diphthongs(Table l4):
2. Analysis of Misarticulations

Analyze the subject's production of the phonemeslisted as singles(OverlayA. Initial and Final ConsonantSingles;
OverlayG, Vowels; Overlay H, Diphthongs).
2-a. List all error sounds,indicating position of error (I or F)
Omissions
Substitulions

Distortions

2-b. Which of these phonemes, incorrectly articulated as singles in the initial or final positions as indicated above, were
correctly articulatedas singlesin at leastone position?

2'c. Which of thesephonemes,incorrectly articulated as singlesin any position, were correctly producedin any of the clusters
in which thev were further tested?

2d. Which phonemes,not correctly producedas singlesin any position or subsequentlyin clusters,were correctly produced
following stimulation as describedbelow?
As a Single

I4$sl4!ien

2+.

In a svllable

In a Cluster
In a word

In a word

The following phonemeswere neverarticulatedcorrectly anywherein the test or following any type of stimulation:

3. Facton PossiblyRelatedto Patternsof Misarticulation

ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS

Descriptionof distortionerrorsnotedon recordsheet:

Rating of intelligibility of contextual speech:

Readily intelligible
Intelligible if listener knows topic
Words intelligible now and then
Completely unintelligible

Errors noted in contextual speechnot noted on articulation test:

Description of testing situation:

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy