Human Resource Management in The Hospitality Industry: Ninth Edition
Human Resource Management in The Hospitality Industry: Ninth Edition
Human Resource Management in The Hospitality Industry: Ninth Edition
HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT IN THE
HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY
A guide to best practice
Now in its ninth edition, Human Resource Management in the Hospitality Industry is fully
updated with new legal information, data, statistics and examples. Taking a process approach,
it provides the reader with an essential understanding of the purpose, policies and processes
concerned with managing an enterprises workforce within the current business and social
environment.
Since the eighth edition of this book there have been many important developments in this
eld and this ninth edition has been completely revised and updated in the following ways:
Extensively updated content to reect recent issues and trends including: labour markets and
industry structure, impacts of IT and social media, growth of international multi-unit brands,
role of employer branding, talent management, equal opportunities and managing diversity.
All explored specically within the hospitality industry.
The text explores key issues and shows real-life applications of HRM in the hospitality industry
and is informed through the authors research projects within Mitchells & Butlers plc, Pizza
Express, Marriott Hotels and Caf Rouge.
An extended case study drawing from the authors experience working with Forte and Co.,
Centre Hotels, Choice Hotels and Bass, Price Waterhouse and Grant Thornton.
Supported with new lecturer and student online resources at http://www.routledge.com/
books/details/9780415632546/.
Written in a user-friendly style and with strong support from the Institute of Hospitality, each
chapter includes international examples, bulleted lists, guides to further reading and exercises
to test knowledge.
Michael J. Boella is Faculty Fellow at the University of Brighton and specializes in teaching human
resource management and law.
Steven Goss-Turner is Head of Operations of the School of Sport and Service Management at
the University of Brighton.
Human Resource
Management in the
Hospitality Industry
A guide to best practice
Ninth edition
Michael J. Boella and Steven Goss-Turner
Contents
List of gures
About the authors
Foreword by Philippe Rossiter
Foreword by Michael Hirst
Preface
Part 1
1
2
Part 2
3
4
5
6
Reward systems
Job evaluation
Incentives
Employee benets
Part 5
14
15
Performance management
Training
Management development
Part 4
10
11
12
13
Job design
Recruitment
Selection
Appointment and induction
Part 3
7
8
9
vii
x
xi
xii
xiv
1
3
14
33
35
49
63
79
89
91
104
117
129
131
139
147
153
161
163
175
v
Contents
16
17
18
Employment law
Human resource planning and information systems
Productivity and labour costs
Part 6
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Appendix 5
Index
vi
184
196
206
215
217
229
244
256
265
273
279
287
291
295
297
314
321
Figures
1.1
1.2
1.3
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
6.1
6.2
6.3
7
9
11
15
16
17
18
20
28
36
40
41
42
45
46
52
53
54
56
57
58
58
59
64
65
67
69
71
74
75
80
81
83
vii
List of gures
6.4
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
9.1
9.2
9.3
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.5
12.1
12.2
12.3
13.1
14.1
14.2
14.3
14.4
14.5
14.6
15.1
15.2
16.1
17.1
17.2
18.1
18.2
18.3
18.4
18.5
viii
86
92
94
97
100
110
111
112
113
114
120
120
123
132
135
135
136
141
142
143
143
144
150
150
151
154
164
164
169
169
170
172
177
181
185
198
201
207
208
210
211
211
List of gures
18.6
19.1
19.2
19.3
19.4
19.5
19.6
20.1
20.2
20.3
20.4
20.5
20.6
20.7
20.8
20.9
20.10
20.11
21.1
21.2
21.3
21.4
21.5
21.6
21.7
22.1
24.1
24.2
213
220
223
224
224
225
226
230
230
231
232
235
236
236
239
240
241
241
245
245
246
250
251
252
253
260
275
276
Appendices
A4.1
A4.2
A4.3
A4.4
301
304
306
311
ix
Dr Steven Goss-Turner is Head of Operations for the School of Sport and Service Management at
the University of Brighton. He has degrees from both Strathclyde and Portsmouth Universities
and was awarded a PhD from the University of Brighton in 2010 for a programme of study
entitled, The Relationship between Organisational Culture and Labour Turnover, which
included substantial eld research within the hospitality industry.
Before joining the University of Brighton in 1992, he spent 16 years with the then Trusthouse
Forte Hotels, including Regional Human Resources Director for the London and International
Division. He is the author of a number of books and articles, focussing particularly on aspects of
the service industries connected to workplace cultures, labour turnover and human resource
strategy in multi-site businesses.
Michael J. Boella has a Masters degree in employment studies from Sussex University. He is a
Faculty Fellow at the University of Brighton and specialises in teaching human resource management and law. He was a visiting professor at the University of Perpignan in France and teaches
regularly at the University of Applied Sciences in Bonn and at the Angell Business School in
Freiburg. He also taught regularly at the Ecole Hotelire de Lausanne. Mike worked for Forte
and Co Ltd and Bass as a Human Resource Manager and for Price Waterhouse as a management
consultant. Mike has been editor of a number of Croner publications for over twenty years and is
joint author of Principles of Hospitality Law.
Mike has received several awards for his work: the Special Acheivement Award of the Hotel
and Catering Personnel and Training Association, Honorary Faculty Fellowship of Brighton
University, the Award for Excellence from the University of Applied Sciences in Bonn and
admission to the Confrie du Sabre dOr.
Foreword
Philippe Rossiter, MBA, FIH, FCMI, FTS, FRGS, FRSA, AIL
Chief Executive
Institute of Hospitality
January 2013
It says much for the quality and value of this publication that it has now reached its ninth
edition. To have maintained its place as an essential text for so many years Human Resource
Management in the Hospitality Industry has had to remain relevant to its broad audience. That it
has done so through successive reviews is a tribute to the scholarly work of its authors, Michael
Boella and Steven Goss-Turner, and this latest edition, once again, bears witness to their
assiduous attention to detail and careful evaluation of the topic in the context of todays
environment.
Full of informative examples and pertinent guidance, this ninth edition has updated
the subject in a timely and appropriate fashion. Whilst the fundamental principles governing
the sound management of people remain constant, the circumstances in which they operate
continue to evolve at an ever-accelerating rate. For example, the rapid advances in technology
since the previous edition have witnessed the advent of social media as a powerful force in our
lives. This phenomenon alone is now requiring managers and businesses to re-assess their
relationships with employees, many of whom have grown up with these technological
advances. Furthermore, these new entrants to our industry often approach the world of work
with a very different set of cultural norms to those held by their managers, presenting a new set
of challenges for both parties.
For these reasons, Human Resources Management in the Hospitality Industry remains a vital text
for all who aspire to a leadership role within the sector. As the industrys professional body, the
Institute of Hospitalitys prime objects are: the promotion of best practice and the advancement of
education in hospitality management. This is why I am delighted to see these twin missions so
amply supported in this latest edition, and the authors are to be congratulated on maintaining the
freshness, relevance and breadth of coverage in a book that should be a key component in the skills
armoury of all managers and aspiring managers across the hospitality industry.
xi
Foreword
Michael Hirst, OBE
Former Chairman and Chief Executive
Hilton International
January 2013
This book, now in its ninth edition, offers an in-depth description of sound human resource
management practices, in the hospitality industry. Managing the workforce effectively is
perhaps the single most important issue in delivering rst-class service which underpins a
hotels performance, reputation and protability.
For more than 40 years, I have persisted in the international hotel industry. First as a hotel
school graduate, then as a trainee in almost every department, before rising through the
management ranks of UK domestic hotel companies to assume the most senior job with
one of the leading international hotel brands, Hilton Hotels. Throughout this journey the
importance of good, well-skilled and enthused people was paramount in helping me achieve
corporate objectives.
In retrospect I dont think the principles of sound people management or the challenges of
developing a committed labour force in the hotel industry have really changed since I rst
started in the industry. Of course labour laws and regulations have increased as policymakers
and employee representatives have sought to offer greater employment safeguards and
benets.
At the international level, the countries of origin of hotel staff, particularly management and
supervisors, have changed dramatically. In the past, companies, in order to preserve their brand
integrity in new countries, tended to post skilled staff from their own already successful properties. In many countries, however, immigration rules have changed in order to protect local
employment, ensuring that home-grown employees have employment priority. In addition,
more international companies can now rely on a more abundant source of local trained
labour in domestic markets, as a result of local education and training initiatives. Even so,
restrictions on importing senior management and skilled supervisors present companies with
challenges as they work to protect the integrity of their brand.
Outsourcing too has changed the management of many properties. Initially services such as
laundries were outsourced. This was extended to housekeeping and some food and beverage
operations. Now restaurants are being run by celebrity chefs, all adding to the variety of
operational and employment arrangements and challenges both within a single property and
within a whole company.
I have always felt that good hotel management requires a hands-on approach and strong
communications and leadership skills. However, we now see an almost never-ending supply of
new branded hotels, operating on an almost formulaic basis, setting out in countless manuals
and checklists the dos and donts of human resource management, removing much of a hotel
managers accountability, responsibility and discretion.
Theres no denying that hotel brands, operated under management contracts or by franchise
have become the way in which hotel companies are growing across all continents of the world,
and consistency of operation is critical. Getting the balance right, however, is vital. Local culture
xii
Foreword
and employment regulations play a big part in how employees are deployed, just as local culture
impacts upon guests in the experience they expect and receive.
The real risk for general managers is that some remote Head Ofce function removes
the discretion of local management to organize and inspire their workforce according to the
particular circumstances and market position of each hotel. This removes the one most critical
attribute of the General Manager and his or her Department Heads, i.e. his or her ability to
exercise judgement, to make decisions. Granted that employment law is a mineeld and prescribed arrangements need to be in place and understood, it is my view the human resource
function should be at the service of General Management and not the other way round.
It is a much-used statement to say Hotels are a People Business, but it is a truism. Having a
clear understanding of the overarching principles of HR planning, recruitment, selection, induction, training, performance management and people development (now talent management),
reward and remuneration and regulation is a necessary part of running a people business.
In Michael Boella and Steven Goss-Turners book, both authors with years of experience in
some of the worlds largest hotel and hospitality companies, youll nd all of this and a lot more.
xiii
Preface
This book has always presented a particular challenge, knowing that its long-term success has
been largely because it has been written to be very readable and accessible to a wide range of
readers. This book has never been addressed solely to the academic community instead it is
addressed to practising managers and to students intending to be managers, and to their
teachers. More than anything else we aim to indicate best practice. What constitutes best
practice is a question of opinion but we are basing what we consider best practice on a wide
range of sources including publications and research and discussions with many managers from
many companies and countries.
We have avoided straying into the related sector of tourism, because the various different
hospitality sectors represent over 60 per cent of the hospitality, leisure, travel and tourism
businesses (People 1st, State of the Nation Report, 2011) and, whilst there are considerable
overlaps between the various sectors, we believe that the hospitality sectors have distinctive
characteristics.
As we wrote in the eighth edition of this book, the original edition was written when
personnel management in the hospitality industry was practised by a handful of employers
and even in these cases it was conned to a few functions of personnel management such as
recruitment and training. Today, forty years later, we can say that human resource management
(HRM) in the hospitality industry has grown in its impact and status, with an increasing number
of HR Directors being appointed at executive board member level. However, it is clear that in
such a fragmented industry, with the vast majority of businesses employing ve or fewer staff,
there is still much to do, in order to develop a positive image of the sector as a rst choice for
long-term career employment.
Each new edition has been prompted by a variety of changes that have affected the
hospitality industry, including political, legal, economic, social and technological changes, and
this edition is no different. Many of these changes have had considerable inuence on the
management of the industrys human resources.
One key issue, developed even since the last edition, is the impact of the Internet in the case
of staff recruitment most major companies have largely abandoned the print media for the
Internet. Furthermore, various web-based media, such as TripAdvisor, have very signicant
impacts on marketing, which in turn impacts on staff recruitment and training. There is now
also an increasing concern for the environment and sustainability, in many cases a genuine
concern, in other cases mere green-washing.
A key economic element has been the growth in the reach and the scale of hospitality companies,
many now global actors. Such growth has an almost insatiable appetite for human resources at all
levels and one consequence is the multicultural nature of the workforce today it is reported that
nearly 40 per cent of staff in UK restaurants were not born in the UK and over 30 per cent of
managers were born overseas. Similar patterns can be observed in many other countries.
xiv
Preface
The issues of HRM across multi-site companies and in an international context have been
developed to a greater extent in this edition, largely due to Steven Goss-Turners PhD research
into the eld.
Together with the globalization trend, the need to meet shareholder expectations creates
other pressures which often result in changes to the management of an enterprises human
resources. Such changes may include more exible but often polarized and distanced workforces, outsourcing of large sections of a business activity, reliance on agency staff and shortterm contracts. In the UK it is reported that 70 per cent of businesses rely upon part-time
workers. All of which creates a purely economic relationship with little room for loyalty.
Another consequence of such economic pressures is atter organization structures with more
empowered or enabled workers, but often with fewer internal promotion and personal
development prospects.
At the same time, many employers, some conscious of these trends, are improving their
human resource management practices through participating in a range of schemes such as
Investors in People, the British Hospitality Associations Excellence through People, and the
Institute of Hospitalitys Hospitality Assured schemes.
Such trends and developments create tremendous paradoxes for contemporary hospitality
managers. Whilst many companies wish to recognize the needs of all their stakeholders, they
also have to remain competitive in a global market.
We are grateful to all those who have made this latest edition and earlier editions possible,
including the many companies and associations that have allowed us to use their material.
These include: the British Hospitality Association, the Chartered Institute of Personnel and
Development, Janine Mills of the Institute of Hospitality and Matthew Ruck of Marriott Hotels.
Finally, we are very grateful to Philippe Rossiter of the Institute of Hospitality, and Michael
Hirst, previously CEO of Hilton International.
Thanks also to Juliet Boella for all her work on this ninth edition, having worked also on every
edition since the rst edition.
Michael J. Boella, MA, FIH, Charter member CIPD
Steven Goss-Turner, Ph.D., MSc, FIH, Charter member CIPD
January 2013
xv
Part 1
The hospitality industry
HRM context
Chapter 1
Background to the
industrys workforce
A proliferation of competing brands, shorter business and product life cycles together with many
different business models all make the worlds business environment more complex and challenging.
The hospitality industry is no exception. Even in periods of recession such as those experienced since
2008 the hospitality industry has seen signicant changes with some sectors growing such as restaurants,
coffee houses and the budget hotels sectors, whilst others have seen an equally dramatic decline such as
the public house (licensed bar) sector.
Within hotels we have seen the continuing growth of the budget hotels sector and we have seen the
steady growth of boutique hotels, once the preserve of enthusiastic private hotel operators, into
signicant chains within larger multinational chains. At the international level we also see
rapid expansion of international hotel brands, such as Hilton, as the middle classes grow in many
countries including the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China) to which are added some African
economies.
Hotels and hotel companies are constantly changing hands so that we see what some may describe as
churning of many hotel properties. Some iconic brands have been bought and sold several times in a
few years. Many have disappeared.
Various different forms of business models are now common. Apart from simple owner-operated
properties other forms of operation include management contracts (or agreements), franchising,
voluntary chains (or consortia), joint ventures, branded reservation services and combinations of two
or more of these. In addition, subcontracting, outsourcing and offshoring alter signicantly the
traditional business models.
At the social level we are witnessing important developments. On the negative side we are witnessing
signicant increases in obesity- and alcohol-related problems. On the positive side there are increased
concerns for the environment, sustainability, animal welfare, health and healthy eating and drinking.
These all impact directly or indirectly on the industry. At the technological level there has been a
dramatic transformation in how customers access these services.
In the past, customers may have relied upon classication systems and brands for promises of
quality. Today, social media has entered the business environment, with sites such as TripAdvisor
playing a signicant part in customer behaviour. A report published in Ehotelier.com (December
2011) stated that 60% of guests use one or more social networking platforms during their search,
shop and buy process. And whilst brands play a vital role they are seriously challenged to deliver on
their promises by the social media.
In addition, whilst hospitality operators have operated basic forms of yield management for many
years, the adoption and development of computerized hospitality-specic yield management systems
have led to the need for new skills and, in many cases, modied organization structures.
All these developments have signicant impact on the human resourcing of businesses. Shorter
business and product life cycles, atter organization structures and the churning of properties means
that lifelong careers, or even moderately long careers with one employer are harder to encounter, being
replaced by portfolio careers and even portfolio jobs (i.e. two or more part-time jobs at the same time).
From the hospitality industrys perspective, there are many accompanying societal changes with great
signicance for the industrys operators. These include easier and cheaper travel and, as a consequence of
improved lifestyles and medical services, increased longevity, resulting in increasing populations and
demographic restructuring. Alongside this, the media in their many different forms are informing and
shaping peoples behaviour as never before.
The contributions made by the hospitality industry to this general rise in standard of living are
considerable and varied, providing essential products and services, leisure services, large-scale employment and wealth creation. Tourism, of which the hospitality industry is a principal element, is now
claimed to be the worlds fastest growing industry and also one of the leading earners of foreign currency.
The total value of tourism to the UK in 2009 was estimated to be 86 billion, with overseas visitors
spending close to 12 billion of that gure in foreign currency (People 1st, 2011). The value to the
nations 2009 gross domestic product (GDP) of specic hospitality sector and related services was
estimated at 4.9 per cent.
The UK hospitality industry, with its ever-developing range of products and services, has seen
considerable growth in recent years. In 2010 and 2011 alone, according to the British Hospitality
Association, 276 new hotels were built adding 35,000 rooms to the hotel stock. The high streets of towns
are now as much a forum of branded restaurants and coffee houses as they are for general retailers.
Whilst there have been substantial technical improvements, and conditions in the industry may have
improved over what they were in the past, the relative status of the industry as an employer, compared
with other employers, has not improved signicantly. Admittedly at the top of the scale, some highly
skilled workers such as chefs, who are in short supply, can command very high incomes, but at the other
end of the scale, kitchen porters and cleaners, for example, would earn considerably higher wages for
broadly similar work in other employment sectors. This is in spite of efforts being made by some of the
larger companies in the industry to improve conditions.
Among the reasons must be the fact that most employees only generate between 42 and 81 per hour
for their employer compared with many other industries in which employees may generate many times
that for their employer. Of this between 10 and 40 per cent will be taken up by labour costs, the
remainder going towards material costs, property costs, xed costs and prot. In contrast, the gambling
sector generates around 120 per hour per employee (People 1st, 2011). With few exceptions, catering
services do not lend themselves easily to signicant mechanization. As a result, the industry is heavily
labour-intensive and labour costs dominate many prot-and-loss accounts.
The reasons for the relatively slow rate of improvement in the industrys conditions of employment
are considerable, including an understandable reluctance on the part of many proprietors and managers
to be among the rst to charge higher prices for their services, particularly when the UK is reported to be
among the most expensive of tourist destinations. Second, the industry also consists of many small
employers (46 per cent with fewer than ten employees). A third reason, linked to the former reason, is
that there are few barriers to entry and limited capital requirement. One consequence is that many
entering the industry lack knowledge and experience and so the failure rate is relatively high. A fourth
reason is that the trade union movement exerts no inuence in most sectors of the industry, which
contrasts with some other countries. A fth reason is that the industrys workforce consists largely of
people drawn from the secondary labour market, i.e. those not committed to the industry on a long-term
basis (such as students, school leavers, housewives). For these reasons, the industry has its own less
obvious but costly labour problems including such phenomena as a high labour turnover rate,
institutionalized pilfering and low service standards in many establishments.
Because of the nature of the hospitality industry (i.e. many small businesses taking cash) the industry
is host to a signicant black or shadow economy. This is discussed in more detail in Chapter 16,
Employment Law. However, the black or shadow economy was estimated, at the European level in
2005, to be in the region of 15 per cent of the industrys total revenue (Schneider, 2005). In the UK the
tax authorities (HMRC) suggests that the UKs black economy is of the order of 6 to 8 per cent of GDP
and probably higher in the hospitality industry.
It is, of course, to be expected that some aspects of working in the hospitality industry may be
unattractive when considered alongside other sectors. There are intrinsic and largely unavoidable
challenges such as having to work evenings, weekends and bank holidays. Other problems, however,
can certainly be reduced or eliminated by determined management action. These problems include
split-shift working, unpredictable working hours, staff reliance on tips, ignorance of methods of
calculating pay and distributing service charges, and managements reluctance to involve staff in matters
that affect their working lives. A number of reports have highlighted these difculties which, together
with some management attitudes and practices, undoubtedly cause much of the industrys human
resourcing problems. Even today, for example, many employers and managers expect all employees,
whatever their position and wage rate, to be dedicated to their jobs, to have a vocational fervour towards
their work and to sacrice leisure time for pay that is not high by general economic standards. These
same employers and managers fail to recognize that their own motivation to work is usually completely
different from that of their staff, and that many work people throughout the community are becoming
less work-oriented for various reasons. Employers in industry must reconcile themselves rapidly to the
fact that the majority of potential staff are less likely to be singularly and vocationally committed unless
ways and means are found to harness what some researchers claim is a natural motivation to work.
At the International Hotel and Restaurants Association Human Resource Think Tank in
the Netherlands (1999) this issue was discussed and it was concluded that a distinction has to be
made between loyalty and commitment, loyalty being a two-way long-term attitude of trust and reliance
between employer and employee, whereas commitment is perceived as a shorter-term professional/
economic relationship which endures so long as each is dependent upon the other (see Chapter 2). A
similar issue has been addressed in the UK governments MacLeod report which was concerned with
employee engagement, with examples from the hospitality industry (MacLeod and Clarke, 2010).
the British hospitality industrys employers is that many potential employees now look overseas for
employment. At the same time many foreigners come to the UK, in many cases to learn English.
Business continuity
One of the crucial features of modern life is that businesses and organizations are subject to events
outside of their control, including natural disasters such as storms and ooding, and man-made events
such as terrorism. One thing that modern organizations need to do therefore, because of the potential
impact of such events on the organization itself and upon its employees, is to have business continuity
plans in place. (See Appendix 2, the Institute of Hospitalitys Business Continuity guidance notes.)
Other hospitality sector brands, however, were developing. In the UK one of the earliest fast food
brands to develop was the Wimpy bar, to be followed years later by the entry and domination of US
brands including McDonalds, KFC and Burger King. These brands really heralded the emergence of
what we now refer to as hard brands, offering consistency and reliability which many other brands
failed to deliver. For many years these hard brands imposed their perception of customer demand on
customers. Such fast food operations constitute a relatively easy and inexpensive eld to enter but
success demands expertise and promotional effort, which are increasingly beyond the resources of the
independent. The franchise side of the hospitality industry, as a result, is growing along with franchising
generally.
In the hotel sector, similar developments are evident in the growth of the consortium movement, such
as Best Western, by which individual hotel businesses can collaborate with other similar establishments
in order to compete effectively against the large national and multinational companies, especially in the
areas of marketing and global distribution and reservation systems.
While the industry has established its importance from an economic point of view, it could be hoped
that those employed in the industry would be reaping rewards that echo this increased importance. In
many cases this may well be so, with key people such as chefs and waiters at leading restaurants and
good managers earning high rewards.
However, as reported above, the industry does still have a reputation for low pay, which is also
discussed later in the book, because it is not as simple a matter as outside observers appear to think. The
value of tips, food, accommodation, laundry and savings on fuel and fares all have to be taken into
account: anyone living in avoids some of the heavy daily transport and accommodation costs. Also it
must be borne in mind that a very large proportion of the industrys workforce is drawn from a
secondary labour market. Because of this, many work people may not have high-value skills to offer,
or alternatively their motives to work may put a premium on the convenience of their work (location,
hours, family), for which they will sacrice higher incomes.
In fact, earlier research from Bath University, published in 1999, found that catering workers are in
the half of the population most happy with their jobs despite poor pay and image:
Job
Restaurant and catering managers
Bar staff
Chefs and cooks
Catering assistants and
counterhands
Waiters and waitresses
Kitchen porters and hands
Publicans, innkeepers, licensees
The most satised workers were child-carers, with a satisfaction rating of 60 per cent. The lowest were
metal workers, with a rating of 20 per cent. Professor Michael Rose of Bath University concluded that
part-time women were more satised than full-timers and men in similar positions and staff satisfaction tended to drop with improved skills and greater access to alternative jobs (Caterer and
Hotelkeeper, 16 September 1999). Lucas (2004) supports the general tone of the Bath ndings, utilizing
evidence from the 1998 Workplace Employment Relations Survey, declaring that many hospitality
employees are more positive about their jobs than many in better-paid sectors.
Undoubtedly, low pay in the industry exists, but it is not something that can be put right
overnight. Britains hotels and restaurants are already reported to be among the most expensive in the
world, so increases to tariffs are not the answer. Instead, a thorough reappraisal of the services offered
and the consequent manning levels and staff training may lead to greater productivity. In this eld,
strides have been made; capital investment is made to replace the most menial or repetitive tasks,
and efforts are made to improve the standard of training. However, increased productivity in service
industries is not as easy to achieve as in many other industries without making radical changes to
the nature of the service itself. To some extent this is happening, particularly through increasing the
amount of customer participation, whether this is by buffet-style breakfasts or by automated check-in
and check-out procedures such as those developed by Formule 1, the budget division of the French
Accor group.
Most improvements and efforts seem to be made at the tip of the iceberg, mainly among the larger
companies. Much the greater numerical proportion of the industry is made up of smaller employers
who each employ a few staff only and who for a variety of reasons are not able or prepared to evaluate
their own business methods as rigorously as is required in todays aggressive business climate.
One consequence is the growth of the larger companies at the expense of smaller companies, which is
a phenomenon not conned to the hospitality industries, but is a general phenomenon of consolidating
industrialized societies.
In essence, therefore, major structural changes are taking place in the workforce, and in methods and
organization of work. These can be summarized as follows:
1 Employment in manufacturing is declining as productivity is improved through automation and
outsourced to other (lower wage) countries.
2 Employment in personal services is increasing.
3 There will be growth in the secondary labour market and a decline in the primary labour market.
4 There will be an increase in white-collar employment.
5 There will be a decline in manual employment.
6 There will be a decline in long-term, full-time work, with more people doing more than one job,
including professionals pursuing a so-called portfolio career and a growth in interim management.
7 There will be a reduction in job security.
8 Technological change and economic pressures cause redistribution and reorganization of work as
evidenced by the outsourcing to other countries such as India of much routine information processing
and call-centre work.
These trends were anticipated some years ago by Charles Handy (see Chapter 2) who wrote that the fullemployment society was becoming the part-employment society, that the one-organization career was
becoming rarer and that sexual stereotyping at work was no longer so rigid.
It is worth adding that such changes in working patterns are not all imposed by employers. In many
cases it is the supply side of the labour market, the employees, who demand conditions such as more
exible working practices and family-friendly policies of the employer, caused largely by societal
changes such as the increase in the number of single-parent families. This is evidenced today by
employers asking when potential employees would be available for work, rather than insisting on
traditional shift patterns. The trend towards fewer full-time jobs was supported by the Labour
Market Review 2003 (Hospitality Training Foundation, 2004), which reported that only 48.1 per
cent of the hospitality workforce is full-time. In 2011 63 per cent of employers offered exible working
which included job-share, condensed hours working and exi-time (People 1st, 2011).
supervisors 94 per cent; craftspeople 55 per cent; and operatives 65 per cent. Cafs and public houses
had the highest rates of losses, caused largely by young people using the industry as an interlude between
school or college and a full-time career. Figures for 2011 are shown in Figure 1.2.
Although labour turnover can appear to be relatively high among some sectors and some employers,
it is vital that proper comparisons are made and also to recognize that not all labour turnover is the
consequence of poor employment practices. Many smaller employers cannot offer careers or
career progression, so employees will naturally move from one employer to the other, but they remain
in the industry. These can be described as transient workers. Transient workers are most common
within customer service staff (1314 per cent of workers) and front-line staff (1619 per cent of workers)
(People 1st, 2011). Some refer to this as circulation as opposed to turnover, because the employees
concerned are not lost to the industry.
In other cases many employers recruit directly from the secondary labour market, i.e. workers
who are not committed to a particular industry. Many workers such as school leavers, students and
long-term tourists are seeking short-term employment, sometimes just to earn holiday money or to
learn the language, before starting their studies or returning home. Among some employers, particularly
in the fast food sector, there is a very high level of labour turnover, often attracting candidates
experiencing their rst entry into the job market, but labour turnover is anticipated and can be properly
managed.
Some key features of the hospitality industry workforce include (People 1st, 2011):
High proportion of part-time working; 67 per cent of hospitality businesses rely on part-time
working to manage demand uctuations.
High proportion of women; ranging from 65 per cent in sales and customer services to 44 per cent in
management.
High proportion of younger people; 44 per cent of the workforce is under 30 (UK overall gure is
24 per cent).
High proportion of transient workers; up to 19 per cent for some front-line staff.
Pay
While there are many instances of high rates of pay in the industry top executives are in the six-gure
bracket the image overall is not good in this respect. Reliance, in some sectors, on tipping still exists to a
greater extent than some consider desirable. The practice of paying employees the basic or near basic
wage and also putting notices on menus and price lists that service charges are included has had the effect
of diverting customers tips into company revenue. In many cases this practice has an adverse effect on
net earnings. First, all of the service charge may not be distributed to the staff, and second, income from
such a source is taxed (VAT and income tax), which was not done previously.
In these circumstances, where low pay and distrust of the employers wage practices exist, it is to
be expected that pilfering on a signicant scale takes place. A report based upon an Open University case
study, Room for Reform, claimed that pilfering appeared to be an institutionalized part of wage
bargaining in hotels. Management often recognized it as a way to boost inadequate pay (see Mars and
Mitchell, 1979).
Today, ddles (theft) range from straightforward short-measuring and short-changing of customers
to supplying ones own household with cleaning materials, toilet paper, light bulbs, crockery, cutlery
and even towels and other linen. Some ddles are quite sophisticated and operate at quite high levels.
It has been known for managers to redecorate their own homes at their employers expense, or for a
manager to deduct the cost of grass cutting from the hotels petty cash and to arrange for a farmer to
pay the manager for hay taken from the same land. In regular spot surveys, not one industrial release
student questioned had not witnessed pilfering.
Such practices, however, must be seen in proper perspective, bearing in mind that some other
industries, trades and professions provide vastly more lucrative opportunities than those provided in
the hospitality industry.
Within larger hospitality companies HRM appears to be taken more seriously. Even so, the determining
factor appears to be one more of attitude to human resource issues rather than the size of business in
itself. Where human resource or personnel professionals are employed, HR management has become
more sophisticated.
Evidence of the increasing sophistication of the human resource may be found in some academic
research (see Chapter 2). Furthermore other evidence was to be found in the Hotel and Catering Personnel
and Training Associations (HCPTA) annual awards for excellence in human resource management. Each
year hospitality companies submit human resource activities for consideration for these awards. Many of
the ideas submitted show considerable concern for the employers human resources. These range from the
distinctive branding of the HR function as a separate activity (or product) within the company through a
range of training initiatives to schemes concerned with the care of company pensioners. Further encouraging evidence about the increasing professionalism of HRM in the hospitality sector was evidenced in the
research and writings of Kelliher and Johnson (1997), Hoque (2000) and Lucas (2004).
Two of the industrys most inuential bodies set in motion a number of signicant initiatives that
should have long-term effects on the industrys labour force.
10
Excellence through People is based on a ten-point code of good employment practice. It commits employers to:
Recruit and select with care
(so that you can promote a positive image and attract quality staff)
1 Equal opportunities
2 Recruitment
A good employer attracts, selects and employs quality staff, whether full-time or part-time or casual, who are legally
entitled to work in the UK.
Offer a competitive employment package
(so that the staff you take on know what to expect and are well cared for)
3 Contract of employment
4 Health and safety
A good employer ensures that staff are fully aware, in writing, of their terms and conditions of employment and
provides a healthy and safe work environment for them.
Develop skills and performance
(so that standards of customer service and productivity can be enhanced)
5 Job design
6 Training and development
A good employer constantly seeks to increase productivity, business efciency and customer service by improving
staff competence, motivation, effectiveness and job satisfaction.
Communicate effectively
(so that you and your staff are working towards the same goals)
7 Communications
8 Grievances and discipline
A good employer ensures that staff know what is expected of them, keeps them informed of performance and has
arrangements for dealing with discipline and grievances.
Recognise and reward
(so that you can retain highly motivated staff)
9 Performance review
10 Rewards and recognition
A good employer takes steps to keep and motivate quality staff by rewarding them equitably by means of a
well-understood remuneration package.
11
such as the customer promise, business planning, standards of performance, service delivery, training
and development. See Appendix 1.
Investors in People
Investors in People (IiP) was launched to improve business performance and secure competitive
advantage. The scheme has four main principles:
12
For those interested in earlier reports on the industry, previous editions of this book contain some details.
Members of the UKs Institute of Hospitality can access publications including Management Guides which
summarize key information of relevance to hospitality operations (www.instituteofhospitality.org).
Members of the UKs Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) can access a range of
materials including Fact Sheets and articles from over 300 online journal titles relevant to HR. CIPD
members and People Management subscribers can see articles on the People Management website
(www.peoplemanagement.co.uk).
Questions
These questions have been designed so that the rst question in every case can be
answered from material in the accompanying chapter. Subsequent questions
may need reference to material contained in the reading list and maybe to other
sources as well. The last question, in most cases, requires knowledge and experience
of the industry, acquired, for example, through normal employment, holiday work or
industrial placement.
1 The hospitality industry consists of several different and distinct sectors. Discuss
these sectors, identifying the key features of selected sectors (such as casual
dining, ne-dining, fast food, hotels) and how these features inuence the
nature of the workforce of the selected sectors.
2 What factors are likely to inuence the hospitality industrys workforce in the
future?
3 Discuss the key features of the workforce of an employer with whom you are
familiar and the factors which inuence the make-up of the workforce.
13
Chapter 2
Human resource management
(HRM)
Introduction
The great importance of the workforce, the human resources (HR), in ensuring the commercial success
of the hospitality industry and its many thousands of outlets may be succinctly summarized. At a
nancial level, the hospitality workforce payroll is frequently the single largest cost item, measured as
a percentage of wage costs to sales. From a perspective of a service sector, the human resources are
usually the rst point of interpersonal contact between a hospitality enterprise and its customers. Herein
lies the source of the most critical dilemmas and challenges that face the industry: to contain and control
the costs of labour whilst maximizing the quality of service to the customer, the principal focus of the
business. The effective management of these human resources is therefore vital to the prosperity of the
enterprise, whether undertaken by the line managers and owner-managers of smaller businesses or as
part of the responsibility of specialist HR managers in the larger chains.
This hospitality industry, of such national and international economic signicance as outlined in
Chapter 1, is highly competitive and labour-intensive. It is not surprising that in recent years both
practitioners and academics have increasingly sought to tackle the key challenges facing the sector
with a range of HRM initiatives and research-based proposals. Many hospitality companies have
launched extensive recruitment campaigns utilizing all current means of gaining attention from
potential employees, including the Internet and social media. There have been examples of major
training programmes across international boundaries and the setting up of central training academies
as focal points for management development. From mainstream HRM literature, for example, Storey
(2007: 4) notes that as with other service organizations, hospitality has been the subject of an
increasing number of industry-specic human resource studies and publications. There has certainly
been a steady output of publications dealing with the hospitality industry and its frequently documented workforce issues (e.g. Brotherton, 2000; Hoque, 2000; Lucas, 2004; Nickson, 2007).
Although greatly dependent on the performance, commitment and interpersonal behaviour of its
employees, the hospitality industry has been regularly criticized for inadequate people management
practices (Price, 1994; Ogbonna and Harris, 2002; Ritzer, 2007). In particular, the industry and its
image is characterized by its detrimentally high labour turnover rates (Deery and Shaw, 1999; Lashley
and Rowson, 2000), the causes often put down to poor management and training of the all-important
workforce, and the negative implications being increased employee costs and variable customer
service (Davidson et al., 2010).
14
Finance
policy
Market
policy
Product
policy
Human resource
policy
In the modern era of competition and of service industry dominance, human resource policies feature
prominently as part of a contemporary organizations overall business policy and planning, as virtually
every management decision affects, to a lesser or greater extent, the people working within the
enterprise. Most strategic decisions are made within an organizations policy framework (see
Figure 2.1), representing the aims (mission), purposes, principles and intentions of the organization.
These stated policies provide management with the strategic framework within which they make their
decisions, and HR strategy and practice have increasingly become crucial components of this framework
for labour-intensive service businesses in the globally competitive environment of the past few decades.
The hospitality industry, with its high dependence on a workforce that is capable of delivering the
promise of a quality product and service, must embrace the principles that underpin the concept of
human resource management.
15
Storey points to the strategic qualities of HRM, that HR policies are increasingly integrated with business
strategies. This concept of a t between business and HR policy will be explored in this chapter: the
notion that if HRM is in line with or contingent upon the external environment and the service-oriented
internal environment within hospitality situations, then higher performance will result and the competitive
edge is more likely to be established. Another strand of thinking on HRM stresses the value of an
appropriate organizational culture, of individual commitment and a mutuality of objectives and beliefs
of both the employee and the organization. The emphasis on the elements that form an organizations
culture is also a signicant boost for the signicance of HRM policies and practice, as most of these
elements, from worker behaviour and workplace rituals to communications and reward systems, may
be inuenced by the people management of the business especially in service sectors such as hospitality. It
should also be recognized that the interpretation of HRM as outlined above, an all-encompassing
approach to managing people, is not just a role for HRM specialists, but is a role for all line managers
and supervisors, as an integral part of their everyday operational management of employees.
Storeys denition also recognizes that within HRM there is still a requirement for a set of specialist
and essentially administrative personnel practices and techniques; these may include the technical
aspects of job design, job and person specications, recruitment and selection processes, training
plans, job evaluation exercises and payroll management, employee records, grievance and disciplinary
procedures and so on. The HR department is also responsible in many rms for advice and guidance to
line managers in order to ensure compliance with employment legislation, and for staff welfare matters,
and HRM specialists may be required to assist managers in nding solutions to a range of issues related
to people at work (see Figure 2.2). In connection with the recognition that part of the concept of HRM
absenteeism
alcohol abuse
harassment
health and safety
information technology
internationalism
benchmarking
bullying
law of employment
change management
organization structures business process
communications
re-engineering
competencies
outplacement
continuous professional development outsourcing
culture and cultural changes
delayering
discipline
distancing
drug abuse
part-time working
performance-related pay
psychological tests
quality and human resource management
employer branding
empowerment
equal opportunities discrimination
on grounds of gender, race,
age, disability
ethics
family-friendly policies
exible pay systems
racial discrimination
re-engineering
sexual discrimination
smoking at work
succession planning
talent management
trade unions
grievances
violence at work
Recruitment
Selection
Remuneration and
benefit
Appointment
Records and
statistics
Induction/Orientation
Performance
appraisal
Transfers
Dismissal
Review
circumstances,
procedures
Employment
tribunal
Promotions
Terminations
Resignation
Retirement
Exit
interviews
Pensioner
support,
care,
social
schemes
Redundancy
Outplacement
counselling
and
assistance
Ex-employees services,
clubs, alumni associations
retains the application of more operational personnel practices and techniques, Figure 2.3 outlines the
main functions and responsibilities normally covered under the specialist personnel management
function.
Human resource policies and practice do not develop in a vacuum. They are an expression also of the
style and culture of the organization, an expression of its values. Human resource approaches need to be
dynamic, both changing and shaping the behaviour of the workforce within the organizational culture
and framework. The standing and inuence of the HR department is therefore a critical factor. Its
importance can be estimated and demonstrated by considering the levels of risk with which the function
is involved. The different levels of risk range from leadership and strategy to work group morale and
atmosphere (or climate), to the individuals motivation at work, as illustrated in Figure 2.4.
17
|
|
|
| Leadership
|
| strategy
|
| culture
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ |_ _ _ _ _ _ _ | _ _ _ _ _ _ _
|
|
| Work group |
| climate |
Medium
|
|
risk
|Management|
| practice |
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ |_ _ _ _ _ _ _ |__ _ _ _ _ _ _
|
|
Low-risk
Individual |
|
|
tactical
needs and |
|
casework
motivation |
|
|
High-risk
strategy
Level
of
activity
|
|
Individual | Work group | Organization
|
|
Focus on activity
18
especially from the integration of corporate strategy and of organizational culture (notably its corporate
culture interpretation), and the goals of high commitment and performance (Guest, 1987; Appelbaum
et al., 2000; Paauwe, 2008).
A critical factor in the achievement of the frequently stated HRM goals of attaining high commitment
and high performance from employees is a stable workforce of well-trained and motivated people.
Workforce stability, as in effective work groups unfragmented by constantly high labour turnover,
provides the conditions for the building of a cohesive and capable team, and for the employees within
those teams to optimize their performance levels. The hospitality industry has invariably topped the
CIPD national league tables for labour turnover (CIPD, 2009; People 1st, 2011) and this has been the
statistical outcome of a range of HRM issues and challenges faced by the hospitality industry which
require analysis and addressing for its future success.
An exploration of the origins and development of models of human resource management
necessitates an initial review of writers and industrialists based in the United States (see Schuler
and Jackson, 2005). Managers and scholars in the USA were signicantly inuenced by the work of
leading theorists such as McGregor (1960) and Maslow (1943/1970). These important studies of
motivation and people at work fall within the province of the social sciences which are concerned
with studying the relationships between individuals, groups of individuals and their environment.
The knowledge obtained can be used in two principal ways, namely to understand and predict
changes (i.e. to focus on content), and to bring about change (i.e. to focus on process). These
classical and fundamental approaches, a number of which are summarized in Figure 2.5, help our
understanding of the basic and higher needs of humans, from biological satisfaction to social
fullment. This latter state manifests itself in the human pursuit of status, security, power and
other outward signs of success. Many people may not be conscious of these higher needs that drive
or motivate them. If, however, management can recognize them, they can take appropriate steps to
ensure that these driving forces can be used to the advantage of both the individual and the
organization. There is clearly a major role here for HR management and its underlying concepts of
assisting employees in reaching high performance through high commitment, and this vital link was
rst developed within the United States.
The rapid development of the US economy after the Second World War was accompanied by this
rapid development in the study of organizations and management with much attention given to
organizational behaviour and workforce motivation, summarized and critiqued effectively by
Beaumont (1992). Legge (2005: 101) concurs that the term HRM, may be charted rst in the writings
of US academics and managers. As an early example of this inuence, Sampson (1995) refers to
statements by the Chief Executive of the oil company Esso in the 1950s and 1960s, who insisted that
the organization made long-term staff development plans because the staff were as important a physical
asset as the oil reserves drilled from the earth. Sampson (1995: 99) comments that this was part of the
trend towards calling people human resources.
One of the pre-eminent theorists of the post-war period whose inuence can be detected in the modern
models of HRM was Douglas McGregor, whose publication The Human Side of Enterprise (1960) can
be seen to have had a major impact on later approaches to the academic study of HRM as an emerging
discipline. The concepts of Theory X and Theory Y bridged the divide between the concepts of the earlier
scientic management (see Frederick Taylor in Figure 2.5) and human relations schools (see Elton Mayo
in Figure 2.5). Theory X, with its prescription for tightly controlled workers, their effort motivated by
extrinsic, monetary rewards pre-empted the so-called hard approach of HRM. Theory Y, with its
emphasis on intrinsic, social motivational aspects such as group work, self-development and fullment,
provided the foundation for HRM approaches referred to as soft. Indeed, as HRM became a focus for
research and scholarship in US business schools, the hard, Theory X-based approach became more
associated with the University of Michigan (Fombrun et al., 1984), whilst the soft, Theory Y-based
model became known also as the Harvard approach (Beer et al., 1985).
19