Dermatomycological Profile of Patients in A Tertiary Care Hospital of Western Maharashtra
Dermatomycological Profile of Patients in A Tertiary Care Hospital of Western Maharashtra
Dermatomycological Profile of Patients in A Tertiary Care Hospital of Western Maharashtra
Medical Science
Nidhi Sharma
Abhishek Sharma
ABSTRACT
Objective- To find the prevalence of dermatophytes and nondematophytes in cases of clinically diagnosed superficial mycoses
Material and mathods-The study was conducted on the patients attending OPD of Skin and Venereology department for various dermatological complaints. It is an observational study.
A total of 200 samples of skin, hair and nail were taken from patients clinically diagnosed as superficial mycoses.
Results- There were 200 clinically diagnosed cases of superficial mycoses of which male were 138 (69%) and female were 62(31%).Commonest
age group affected was 21-30 years (50%) followed by 31-40 years (28.5%). Among 200 cases, 20(10%) patients were diabetic.
Conclusion- Our study emphasizes the need of knowing the prevalence of various fungal species causing superficial mycoses in an area so
as to treat accordingly and to study the role of non dermatophytes along with dermatophytes in the pathogenesis of superficial mycoses and
not merely discarding them as contaminants.
Introduction.
Infections caused by fungi are called mycoses. Fungal infections
are very common in human beings. They are assuming greater significance both in developed and developing countries particularly
due to advent of immunosuppressive drugs and diseases[1].
Superficial mycoses refers to fungal infections of the outermost layer of skin and its appendages like hair and nails. They are among
the most prevalent of human infectious diseases.These infections
are divided into two groups: the Superficial mycoses, which includes Pityriasis versicolor, Piedra and Tinea nigra and the Cutaneous mycoses which includes Dermatophytoses and Candidiasis.[2]
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), these fungi affect about 25% of the world population. It is estimated that from 30
to 70% of adults are asymptomatic hosts of these pathogens and that
the incidence of the disease increases with age.High prevalence of
nondermatophytic mold onychomycoses has been reported from India (22%) [3,6]. Generally, these fungi exhibit a cosmopolitan profile,
that is, they are found in different regions of the world with variations in the frequency, as climatic factors, social practices, migration
and individual characteristics like nutrition ,hygienic habits and individual susceptibility may influence the epidemiology of dermatomyoses[4,7]. Although dermatophytoses does not produce mortality,
it does cause morbidity and poses a major public health problem,
especially in tropical countries like India due to the hot and humid
climate.[5,3] Over the last decades, an increasing number of non dermatophyte filamentous fungi have been recognized as agents of skin
and nail infections in humans, producing lesions clinically similar to
those caused by dermatophytes.[6,8]. Though commonly considered
as contaminants, they have been reported to colonize damaged tissues and cause secondary tissue destruction[7,9,].
Present study was undertaken with the view to find out prevalence of superficial mycoses in patients attending skin OPD with
complaints of superficial mycoses,in a tertiary care rural hospital.
Material and Methods-The study was conducted from January 2013 to June 2014 for a period of one and a half year on the
patients attending OPD of Skin and Venereology department for
various dermatological complaints.It is an observational study.
A total of 200 sample of skin, hair and nail were taken from patients
clinically diagnosed as superficial mycoses. Before collecting the
sample, some information concerning the patient like Name, sex,
age ,address ,occupation ,socio economic status were recorded .Site
of the lesion and duration of illness were asked .Relevant history
Clinical type
Tineacruris
Tineacorporis
Tineapedis
Tineacapitis
Tineabarbae
Tineamanuum
Tineaunguium
Pityriasisversicolor
Total no. of cases
No.of cases
40
57
25
24
06
12
16
20
200
Percentage (%)
20
28.5
12.5
12
03
06
08
10
100
This Table shows most common clinical presentation was Tineacorporis (28.5%).
IJSR - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
577
Research Paper
0-10 1120
21-30 31-40
4150
5160
6170
19
14
30
17
15
12
40
(20%)
57
(28.5%)
25
(22.5%)
24
(12%)
6(3%)
12(6%)
16(8%)
20(10%)
Total
12 12 100 57
8
7
4
200
(6%) (6%) (50%) (28.5%) (4%) (3.5%) (2%) (100%)
This table shows that most common clinical presentation indermatomycoses as an individual site was Tineacorporis(28.5%) in
all age groups .
Table-4 Dermatomycoses in relation to sex
Clinical presentation
Tineacruris
Tineacorporis
Tineapedis
Tineacapitis
Tineabarbae
Tineamanuum
Tineaunguium
Pityriasisversicolor
Total
Male
Female
Total
35(25.36%)
39(28.26%)
18(13.05%)
19(13.77%)
6 (4.35%)
5 (3.62%)
5 (3.62%)
5(8.06%)
18(29.03%)
7(11.29%)
5(8.07%)
0(0%)
7(11.29%)
11(17.74%)
40(20%)
57(28.5%)
25(12.5%)
24(12%)
6(3%)
12(6%)
16(8%)
11(7.97%)
9(14.52%)
20(10%)
138(69%)
62(31%)
200(100%)
This table shows that most common clinical presentation indermatomycoses as an individual site was Tineacorporis-(28.26%)
among males and( 29.03%) among females. Here male affected are
more than female except in TineaUnguium and TineaManuum.
Table 5 Distribution of dermatophytes and non dermatophytes according to culture positivity.
No.of positive
Total culture
positive patients
for derma- No.of
positive(No. and patients
for non-dermatophytes
tophytes
%)
(No. and %)
(No. and %)
100
75
25
REFERENCE
1. Kumar Arun Singh, Kumar SudhirSrivastava. Aclinico-cycological study on tineapedis at Ranchi.Ind. J Veneral Dermatol.1994 .V60 :(2 ) : 68-71 |
2. Dr.PradeepNawal, Dr.Sachin Patel, Dr.Mitesh Patel, Dr.SumitaSoni ,Dr. Neeta Khandelwal.A Study of Superficial Mycoses in Tertiary Care Hospital.NJIRM 2012; Vol. 3(1).January-March:90-93. | 3. Ranthilaka R Ranawaka ,Nelun de Silva , Ramya W Ragunathan. Non-dermatophyte mold onychomycosis in Sri Lanka. Dermatology Online Journal.2012; 18(1):7 | 4. .NaluTeixera de Aguiar Peres et al.Dermatophytes: host-pathogen interaction and antifungal resistance.An. Bras. Dermatol. 2010. v.85 (5) Rio de
Janeiro | 5. Rippon J. W:Dermatophytosis and dermatomycoses in medical mycology . The pathogenic fungi and the pathogenic actinomycetesPhiladelphia,W B Saunders 1982; 154. |
| 6. .Parul Patel, SummaiyaMulla, Disha Patel, GaurishankarShrimali. A study of superficial mycosis in south gujarat region.National Journal of Community Medicine 2010;Vol. 1, Issue
2:85-8 | 7. WgCdrSanjiv Grover, Lt Col P Roy. Clinico-mycological Profile of Superficial Mycosis in a Hospital in North-East India.MJAFI 2003; 59 : 114-116 | | 8. M Mishra, S Mishra, PC
Singh, BC Mishra. Clinico-mycological profile of superficial mycoses.1998.v64:6:283-85 | 9. TerborghJ.Diversity in the tropical rain forest,Scientific American books,New York.1992:3151. | 10. Dei Cas E. and A. Vernes. Parasitic adaptation of pathogenic fungi to the mammalian hosts.Crit Rev Microbiol 1986; 13(2):173218. | | 11. Ajello L.1977. Taxonomy of the dermatophytes: a review of their imperfect and perfect states ; 289297. InK.Iwata(ed.).Recent advances in medical and veterinary mycology.University of Tokyo Press,Tokyo | 12. Sweta
R. Prabhuetal.Clinico-mycological study of superficial fungal infections in coastal karnataka, india.. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2013; V.2, ( 44) ; 8638-8646. |
13. Vikesh Kumar Bhatia, Prakash Chand Sharma.Epidemiological studies on Dermatophytosis in human patients in Himachal Pradesh, India.Bhatia and Sharma SpringerPlus 2014,
3:134 | 14. Dr. Vyomachudasama.A Study of Superficial Mycosis in Tertiary Care Hospital.V 3 (3) 2014 :222-4. |
578