Simplify BOG Recondenser Design and Operation
Simplify BOG Recondenser Design and Operation
operationPart 1
S. P. B. Lemmers, Vopak LNG Holding BV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
LNG receiving and regasification terminals connect the intermittent process of LNG carrier unloading
and/or loading with the mostly continuous process of LNG vaporization and gas transmission into a
sendout pipeline system.
In addition to these LNG carrier operations, truck/train loading operations can take place simultaneously.
During all operational modes of the LNG terminal, boiloff gas (BOG) is produced, which requires
processing to avoid flaring or venting (under normal operating conditions) and to minimize the
environmental impact of the facility.
There are several options to choose from for the design of BOG recondensers used in LNG terminals.
Design options and equipment installations are reviewed, with a focus on the most optimal methods.
BOG recondensation approach
Of the various options for BOG handling, the most common approach is recondensing the BOG in a
BOG recondenser. Discussed are the design, process control and operational elements of the most
common types of BOG recondensers used in LNG terminals worldwide.
BOG generation and handling. Generation of BOG takes place in any operational mode of the LNG
terminal. BOG is produced mainly because the LNG is stored at cryogenic conditions in a much warmer
ambient environment. The generation of BOG is the result of several factors:
Steady-state heat leak into the LNG carrier, LNG storage tanks, process equipment and LNG
process piping
Mechanical energy input by process equipment [e.g., low-pressure (LP) in-tank and highpressure (HP) sendout pumps]
Displaced vapors from the LNG carrier and LNG storage tanks due to unloading, loading and
sendout flowrates
BOG generation and/or reduction due to creation of BOG/LNG equilibrium in LNG storage
tanks
Elevation difference between LNG from the LNG carrier and LNG from the storage tanks
Atmospheric pressure changes.
The amount of BOG generated is a function of the absolute rates of the above phenomena, and it
changes significantly between the various operational modes. The main operational modes of LNG
terminals are the holding mode (with gas sendout, but no LNG carrier unloading or loading) and the
LNG carrier unloading and/or loading mode(s), also with gas sendout.
Several common options exist for handling BOG generation in an LNG terminal:
LP compression into a fuel gas systeme.g., for LNG vaporization inside the LNG terminal, for
use by nearby industrial consumers or for power generation
HP compression to natural gas pipeline pressures
BOG reliquefaction inside the LNG terminal and return as LNG to the storage tanks
LP compression into a BOG recondenser, in which the BOG is recondensed to LNG.
The last BOG handling option, which focuses on the BOG recondenser, is considered here.
BOG recondensers are commonly applied in LNG terminals where there is continuous sendout of
natural gas via vaporization of LNG. Both HP compression and BOG reliquefaction have high capital
and operating costs, whereas LP compression requires a substantial nearby consumer of LP fuel gas.
However, such a consumer is generally not available.
Vapor handling system. The vapor handling system option including the BOG recondenser consists of
the BOG desuperheater (required for reducing BOG compressor suction temperature), the LP BOG
compressor(s) and the BOG recondenser (Fig. 1).
Annular space type. This first type contacts the LNG and BOG in a packed bed in the center,
surrounded by an annular space. The LNG and BOG are fed to the central packed-bed section. The
liquid level in the BOG recondenser annular space is controlled by manipulating the inlet LNG flowrate
to the packed-bed section, since all of the LNG is directed to the packed-bed section. The packed-bed
liquid level, which is distinct from the level in the annular space (as is the pressure), is not directly
controlled and will vary with the BOG/LNG flow ratio in the center section. The LNG levels and vapor
pressures in the center section and annular space differ during operation.
Top packed-bed section type. The second type of design has a packed section spanning the complete
vessel diameter of the top section, and it has a bottom LNG inlet for the holdup sections of the HP
pumps. The single level is controlled via the bottom LNG inlet flow.
LNG for recondensation, which is part of the LNG flow to the BOG recondenser, is introduced into the
top packed-bed section and brought into contact with the BOG for recondensation. The pressure in the
packed-bed section is identical to the pressure in the holdup section (except for some pressure drop
over the packed bed), and it can be controlled by the LNG supply to the top packed-bed section of the
BOG recondenser. Fig. 2 shows examples of the two basic types of BOG recondensers.
Fig. 2. BOG recondensers: Annular space type (left) and top packed-bed section
type (right).
Mechanical design complexity comparison. From a mechanical design point of view, it is obvious
that design and construction of an annular space type BOG recondenser are more complex. The
annular packed-bed section needs to be supported from the top and should not vibrate at the bottom.
The top packed-bed section type supports the bed all the way around and, therefore, is more robust.
This design features a dedicated removal nozzle for when the packing requires replacement of the top
packed-bed section, while the annular space type requires more decommissioning and reinstatement
work.
Process piping connections. Although both types of BOG recondenser designs fulfill the same
functionsi.e., to recondense BOG and provide NPSH for the HP pumpsthe process piping
connections to HP pumps, vent/flare, padding gas, PSVs, operational and maintenance bypasses, and
control valves can differ from design to design. Designers may even vary the lineup and controls for the
same type of BOG recondenser.
Minimum flow recycle and vent connections. The HP pump, being a high-head, multiple-stage
canned pump, requires minimum flow protection. The HP canned pump motors are cooled by the LNG.
To ensure that the HP pump remains filled with liquid and under cryogenic conditions at all times, the
BOG generated from the surrounding heat leak and HP pump mechanical energy is vented. Both the
minimum flow recycle and vent lines can be directed either to the BOG recondenser or to the LNG
storage tank(s).
Minimum flow recycle to LNG tanks. Directing the recycle back to the LNG storage tanks provides the
advantage of no disturbance to the BOG recondenser operation, such as an impact on pressure and
level control. It also allows for continued sendout of natural gas when the BOG recondenser is out of
operation for statutory inspection or maintenance. When the BOG recondenser is out of operation for
inspection or maintenance for a prolonged period of time, the BOG must be vented and/or flared.
However, a 900-pound-pressure-rating, stainless steel head, sized for recycle operation from all HP
pumps, needs to be routed from the HP pump area to the top of the storage tanks for this design. This
requirement impacts the capital expenditure (CAPEX) of the project, as well as the operational
expenditure (OPEX), since the generated BOG from the HP recycle operation requires another cycle of
compression by the LP BOG compressors.
Venting of HP pumps to LNG tanks. When the HP pumps are not located near the BOG recondenser
(for example, when an LNG terminal has been revamped and there is no space available next to the
BOG recondenser), dedicated vent pots are required for the HP pumps to provide the required NPSH
and maintain cryogenic conditions in the HP pump.
The vent pots are provided with reverse-acting level control (wherein vent gas flow from the pot is
manipulated), and the outlet of the vent pot is directed to more than one LNG storage tank via a
dedicated common vent header. This arrangement not only increases CAPEX, but it also has
operational downsides.
If the level control of the vent pots fails, then LNG is spilled into the vent head to the LNG storage tanks,
or it can reach the vent and/or flare knockout drum installed at a low point. This is problematic because
the vent header generally runs from the vent pots on low elevation over sleepers or a pipe rack to the
top of the LNG storage tanks. This setup inherently forms a low point in which LNG can be trapped,
blocking the free flow of vent gas from the HP pumps. This issue can cascade to vent pot control of
other HP pumps, potentially resulting in the warming of the HP pumps. This scenario is depicted in Fig.
3.
section of the BOG recondenser, and into the annular section for an annular type BOG recondenser. A
baffle impingement plate should be considered to avoid excess turbulence.
Fig. 4. HP pump vent and minimum flow recycle connections to the BOG
recondenser or tank(s).
However, the alternative of bringing the HP pump minimum flow recycle to the packed section is not
recommended, since this process lineup will disturb the pressure controls in the top of the BOG
recondenser during HP pump recycle operation.
Please note that routing the recycle and vent connections to the BOG recondenser is only feasible if
there is no need for continued LNG terminal sendout operations when prolonged shutdowns (i.e.,
statutory periodic inspections) cannot be avoided.
Padding gas connection. Padding gas, taken from downstream of the LNG vaporizers, is required to
maintain a minimum pressure in the BOG recondenser for maintaining required NPSH and stable HP
pump operation. BOG is supplied to the top of the packed section. Therefore, the most logical location to
introduce padding gas is the BOG inlet connection, and all mechanical support and internals for
receiving gas from the top are already designed and installed for this purpose. The introduction of
padding gas at any other location (e.g., underneath the packed bed or directly into the annular space)
requires an additional nozzle on the BOG recondenser, as well as additional mechanical internal design
and reinforcements of the packed bed.
Introducing padding gas underneath the packed bed makes sense if the bed can be blocked by fouling.
However, the BOG recondenser service is one of the cleanest in the oil and gas industry, and blocking
of the packed section by fouling is not feasible. Padding gas can always be safely introduced from the
top.
Pressure safety valve connection. The connection to the PSV should be on the top of the BOG
recondenser, preferably from the BOG inlet connection, for similar reasons as the padding gas supply
connection (i.e., the additional nozzle, and no possibility of blocking the packed bed due to fouling).
Connecting the PSV underneath the packed bed is often proposed; this stems from refinery services
where mist mats and packed sections can be blocked due to fouling.
However, LNG and BOG services are very clean. The PSV comes in a twin configuration to enable
online maintenance, since the BOG recondenser forms a single point of exposure for LNG terminal
availability.
Operational bypass. Some BOG recondenser designs apply an operational bypass, in which a portion
of the LNG from the LP pumps bypasses the BOG recondenser and flows directly into the HP pump
suction cans. This is done to decrease the size of the holdup section (for any given holdup section
residence time) and to reduce vessel costs. Such a bypass is technically feasible since not all of the
LNG is required for BOG recondensation.
However, the introduction of an operational bypass does require additional flow controls that will open
the bypass when the flow through the BOG recondenser increases above the design flow through the
bottom section. Therefore, instrument functions, control valves and cold-keeping bypasses must be
added to the design. In Fig. 5, a flow controller (FC2), associated controls and hardware are added to
the design when an operational bypass is installed. Experience shows that the added cost offsets the
CAPEX savings from the BOG recondenser size reduction.
they eliminate the need for control valves to be in a split-range configuration. The reduction in the
amount of required control valves, brought about by this improved turndown, reduces the need to
introduce more platforms.
Platforms will be congested, complex and more complicated to operate and maintain when there are
many of them, and also when the control valves around the BOG recondenser form a single point of
exposure (requiring the BOG recondenser operation to stop upon failure) when they are supplied with
bypass.
In one industry example, control valves were passing and leaking at a top platform level. Workers
discovered the leaking valves only because they heard noises at grade level. Therefore, by installing
more platforms, significant operational issues may go undetected.
Fig. 6 shows a design with minimal platforms, where the only reason for workers to climb to the top
platform of the BOG recondenser is to conduct PSV inspection and maintenance.
Fig. 6. BOG recondenser design with minimized platforms and control valves
at grade (left) vs. a traditional platform design (right).
Design takeaway
A few conclusions can be drawn from the preceding discussion of BOG recondenser design:
From a mechanical design point of view, an annular space type of BOG recondenser is more
complex and, therefore, likely more costly
Minimum flow recycle and vents on HP pumps should be routed to the nearby BOG
recondenser, rather than to the LNG storage tanks, to minimize operational complexity and
CAPEX:
o HP pump vent pots (required for venting to LNG storage tanks) introduce flanges, fire
zones and operational difficulties when the level control fails
o Running the minimum flow recycle for the HP pumps back to the LNG storage tanks
introduces a costly, 900-pound-pressure-rating return line
No separate padding gas connections to the BOG recondenser are required; padding gas
should enter through the BOG inlet connection
The BOG recondenser service is clean, and the packed bed cannot foul up; the connection to
the PSV should, therefore, be installed on the BOG inlet line, which eliminates the requirement
of a dedicated nozzle
It is doubtful if the installation of an operational bypass actually saves costs, as the bypass
comes with control valves, cold-keeping bypasses, and additional process control complexity,
which largely offsets the savings
from a reduced BOG recondenser holdup volume
It is strongly recommended to ask for exemption of statutory BOG recondenser inspection and
entry from authorities; when such an exemption is granted, a costly maintenance bypass may
be eliminated from the project
To reduce costs and complexity, control valves should be installed as often as possible at
grade, minimizing the number of platforms
Piping to the BOG recondenser should be dressed/clipped as much as possible.
Less is more. An overview of the most commonly used design methods for BOG recondensers reveals
the advantages and disadvantages in BOG recondenser design. BOG recondensers of both types
annular space type and packed-bed typehave been installed and operated successfully.
As a general recommendation, BOG recondenser designers are advised to consider simple designs, as
discussed in Part 1 of this article. Part 2, to be published in the July/August 2014 issue, will examine the
operational aspects of BOG recondensers. GP
Acknowledgment
The author thanks Michiel Baerends from Fluor BV and his colleagues at Vopak LNG Holding BV (part
of Koninklijke Vopak NV), as well as Gate terminal BV for reviewing the article prior to publication.
Sander P. B. Lemmers has more than 17 years of experience in both the technical and business facets
of the global engineering, procurement and construction industry. His technical competencies include
the engineering and design of LNG production and regasification facilities, offshore oil and gas
production, gas compression platforms, ethylene cracking complexes, gas purification and NGL
recovery processes. His business competencies include knowledge of management information
systems, management accounting, sales coordination, strategic business planning and business risk
management. He holds a BSc degree and an MSc degree in industrial engineering and management
and an MSc degree in chemical engineering from Twente University for Technical and Social Sciences
in Enschede, The Netherlands.
At present, Mr. Lemmers is involved in the development of LNG and other liquefied gas terminals in
Southeast Asia, Scandinavia, France and The Netherlands.