This case involves a petition by Nilda B. Tampus to declare her husband Dante L. Del Mundo presumptively dead after he disappeared 33 years ago. The court denied the petition because Nilda failed to meet all the requirements for a declaration of presumptive death under Article 4119 of the Family Code. Specifically, Nilda did not exert active and diligent efforts beyond making inquiries with Dante's family and neighbors to locate him after he was assigned to a combat mission in Jolo, Sulu by the AFP. Her efforts did not satisfy the strict standard of diligence needed to prove a well-founded belief in his death.
This case involves a petition by Nilda B. Tampus to declare her husband Dante L. Del Mundo presumptively dead after he disappeared 33 years ago. The court denied the petition because Nilda failed to meet all the requirements for a declaration of presumptive death under Article 4119 of the Family Code. Specifically, Nilda did not exert active and diligent efforts beyond making inquiries with Dante's family and neighbors to locate him after he was assigned to a combat mission in Jolo, Sulu by the AFP. Her efforts did not satisfy the strict standard of diligence needed to prove a well-founded belief in his death.
This case involves a petition by Nilda B. Tampus to declare her husband Dante L. Del Mundo presumptively dead after he disappeared 33 years ago. The court denied the petition because Nilda failed to meet all the requirements for a declaration of presumptive death under Article 4119 of the Family Code. Specifically, Nilda did not exert active and diligent efforts beyond making inquiries with Dante's family and neighbors to locate him after he was assigned to a combat mission in Jolo, Sulu by the AFP. Her efforts did not satisfy the strict standard of diligence needed to prove a well-founded belief in his death.
This case involves a petition by Nilda B. Tampus to declare her husband Dante L. Del Mundo presumptively dead after he disappeared 33 years ago. The court denied the petition because Nilda failed to meet all the requirements for a declaration of presumptive death under Article 4119 of the Family Code. Specifically, Nilda did not exert active and diligent efforts beyond making inquiries with Dante's family and neighbors to locate him after he was assigned to a combat mission in Jolo, Sulu by the AFP. Her efforts did not satisfy the strict standard of diligence needed to prove a well-founded belief in his death.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
RepublicvsTampusGR214243
FACTS: Respondent Nilda B. Tampus was married to Dante L. Del
Mundo on November 29, 1975. Three days thereafter, or on December 2, 1975, Dante, a member of the AFP, left respondent, and went to Jolo, Sulu where he was assigned. The couple had no children. Since then, Nilda heard no news from Dante. She tried everything to locate him, but her efforts proved futile. On April 14, 2009, she filed before the RTC a petition to declare Dante as presumptively dead for the purpose of remarriage, alleging that after the lapse of thirty-three (33) years without any kind of communication from him, she firmly believes that he is already dead. ISSUE: W/N Dante should be declared presumptively dead RULING: NO. Before a judicial declaration of presumptive death can be obtained, it must be shown that the prior spouse had been absent for four consecutive years and the present spouse had a well-founded belief that the prior spouse was already dead. Under Article 4119 of the Family Code of the Philippines (Family Code), there are four (4) essential requisites for the declaration of presumptive death: (1) that the absent spouse has been missing for four (4) consecutive years, or two (2) consecutive years if the disappearance occurred where there is danger of death under the circumstances laid down in Article 391 of the Civil Code; (2) that the present spouse wishes to remarry; (3) that the present spouse has a well-founded belief that the absentee is dead; and (4) that the present spouse files a summary proceeding for the declaration of presumptive death of the absentee. The "well-founded belief in the absentee's death requires the present spouse to prove that his/her belief was the result of diligent and reasonable efforts to locate the absent spouse and that based on
these efforts and inquiries, he/she believes that under the
circumstances, the absent spouse is already dead. It necessitates exertion of active effort, not a passive one. As such, the mere absence of the spouse for such periods prescribed under the law, lack of any news that such absentee spouse is still alive, failure to communicate, or general presumption of absence under the Civil Code would not suffice. In this case, Nilda testified that after Dante's disappearance, she tried to locate him by making inquiries with his parents, relatives, and neighbors as to his whereabouts, but unfortunately, they also did not know where to find him. Other than making said inquiries, however, Nilda made no further efforts to find her husband. She could have called or proceeded to the AFP headquarters to request information about her husband, but failed to do so. She did not even seek the help of the authorities or the AFP itself in finding him. Considering her own pronouncement that Dante was sent by the AFP on a combat mission to Jolo, Sulu at the time of his disappearance, she could have inquired from the AFP on the status of the said mission, or from the members of the AFP who were assigned thereto. To the Court's mind, therefore, Nilda failed to actively look for her missing husband, and her purported earnest efforts to find him by asking Dante's parents, relatives, and friends did not satisfy the strict standard and degree of diligence required to create a "well-founded belief of his death.
Antonio A. S. Valdez, Petitioner, vs. Regional Trial Court, Branch 102, Quezon City, and Consuelo M. Gomez-Valdez, Respondents. G.R. No. 122749 July 31, 1996