WWW Pa3fwm NL Technotes Tn10b HTML
WWW Pa3fwm NL Technotes Tn10b HTML
WWW Pa3fwm NL Technotes Tn10b HTML
Technical Notes
Single-sideband FM
Soundcards for SDR
Capacitance measurement
Coaxial traps
Input filter for an active antenna
Chirp reception and interpretation
Fundamentals of the MiniWhip antenna
Exponentially switchable coil
Capacitance of antenna elements
Alternative use of a sugar cube
Signal/noise ratio of digital amateur modes
Cone-shaped roller inductor
Grounding of MiniWhip and other active whip antennas.
The Gyrator
Integrating signals, and some moonbounce history
Measuring small inductances and capacitance with the "AVR transistortester"
The "Flevo" medium wave transmitting station
Mediumwave musings
Spiral-shaped variable inductor
The Gyrator
Pieter-Tjerk de Boer, PA3FWM pa3fwm@amsat.org
(This is an adapted version of part of an article that I wrote for the Dutch amateur radio magazine Electron, July
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
2015.)
We all know the transformer, which converts an (AC) voltage into a larger or smaller AC voltage. The ratio between
the primary and secundary voltages equals the ratio of the number of turns of the transformer's coils. At the same
time, also the current is transformed, in the opposite ratio. This is summarised in the left half of the figure.
The Dutch engineer/scientist Bernard Tellegen in 1947 originated the idea (see B.D.H. Tellegen: The gyrator, a new
electric network element, Philips Research Reports, 1948) that in theory one could design a kind of transformer in
which the primary voltage is converted to a secundary current, and vice versa; see at right in the figure. Current and
voltage thus exchange roles. He called this thing a gyrater, because of a theoretical analogy with a flywheel
(gyroscope).
What does such a gyrator do? If on the secundary side we connect a simple resistor R, on the primary side we'll also
measure a resistor, of value s2/R, where s is the gyrator's voltage current conversion ratio. So, the larger the resistor
connected on the secondary side, the smaller the resistance measured on the primary side.
If we connect a capacitor C on the secondary side, things get more interesting. Recall that in a capacitor, the current
leads (i.e., is ahead of) the voltage (you first feed a current into it, before charge accumulates and a voltage
develops across it). Our gyrator exchanges voltage and current, so at the primary side, the current will lag the
voltage, which is the characteristic of an inductor. In other words, a gyrator converts a capacitor into a coil! To be
precise, if we connect a capacitance C on the secundary side, at the primary side one measures an inductance of
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
L=s2C. The reverse is also true: if an inductor is connected to the secundary side, one measures a capacitance on
the primary side.
And this is the use of a gyrator, if we would have one. Large capacitors with good properties can be made relatively
easily, while large inductors tend to be physically large and have large losses and/or parasitic capacitance. With a
gyrator, one could use such a good capacitor as a replacement for a large coil.
While a long piece of copper wire and a chunk of iron give a transformer that's quite close to what an ideal
transformer does, realizing a gyrator is not so easy. In his article, Tellegen considers a couple of practical
realizations, among others based on electromechanical systems and on metal plates, coils and a suspension of
metal particles, but none of those seem to have been very succesful. So his work is essentially limited to a
theoretical construct.
A practical gyrator that radio amateurs have heard about in their license test (although the literatur rarely describes it
as a gyrator), is the quarter-wave transformer. A transmission line (e.g., coaxial cable) of a quarter wave long and
with an impedance Z0 transforms an impedance Z1 connected at one end into Z02/Z1 at the other end. That's
precisely the same formula which also describes the gyrator. The obvious limitation is that such a transmission line
only does this on the frequency at which it is a quarter wave long (or an odd multiple of it), so it is not a general
gyrator.
An electronic gyrator
Nowadays, the gyrator is mostly known as an electronic circuit which in a limited range of voltage, current and
frequency works as a gyrator, and needs a power supply for that. Many gyrator circuits have been designed, and a
simple one is illustrated below (based on P. Strict: Gyrator acts as electronic choke, Electronics World + Wireless
World, Sept. 1993).
pdfcrowd.com
First consider the situation for DC; then we can ignore the capacitor. The transistor ensures that there is about 0.6 V
over R2, and if its currect gain is large enough, its base current can be neglected, so the current through R1 will be
approximately the same as through R2; if R1=R2, there will be another 0.6 V across R1. For DC, the whole circuit
thus behaves as a resistor with value R3, with a constant extra voltage drop of 1.2 V.
For AC, the situation is different. For high frequencies, the capacitor is almost a short circuit. So if we apply a highfrequency AC voltage superposed on a DC voltage, the voltage on the capacitor will be practically constant. The
transistor, acting as an emitter follower, will then ensure that the voltage across R3 is constant too, and thus that the
current through the circuit is constant as well (apart from a small AC current through R1 and C). That looks like an
inductor: one can't have much of an AC current in it.
For intermediate frequencies, some calculations are needed, but the outcome is that the whole thing behaves as an
inductor with value C R1 R3, in series with a resistor R3, and a fixed 1.2 V voltage drop.
We previously defined the gyrator as a thing that effectively interchanges voltage and current, and that's indeed the
case here. The voltage across the capacitor determines, via the emitter follower and the emitter resistor, the current
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
through the circuit as a whole. And the current through the capacitor is determined by the voltage across the circuit
as a whole, since this voltages charges and discharges the capacitor through R1.
The lion's share of the current through the circuit flows through the transistor, but since it has a finite current gain, it
needs to get sufficient base current. That is only possible if R1 is small enough. O.t.o.h., the smaller R1 is, the larger
the current which at high frequencies can flow through R1 and C, "around" the simulated inductor. As a
consequence, the circuit will only behave as an inductor in a limited range of frquencies, but that may be enough.
The impedance graph in the figure also shows taht for very high frequencies, the impedance decreases again. This
is caused by parasitic capacitances in the circuit, in particular the capacitance parallel to R1.
Phantom power
Does all of this have any practical use? I ended up with this circuit when searching alternatives for the phantom
power supply of an active antenna, i.e., supplying DC power to the antenna via the coaxial cable which also
transports the signal. Normally one would use an inductor for this, blocking the high frequency radio signals from the
power supply connections. But finding an inductor which has an impedance of at least 500 ohms over the entire
frequency range of say 10 kHz to 30 MHz, is not so easy. With a gyrator, this is possible. Choose e.g. R3=10 ohm,
R1=R2=1kOhm, C=1F. Then the circuit behaves as an inductor of 10 mH with 10 ohms in series. At 10 kHz, its
impedance is already 600 ohms; at higher frequencies, the leakage via R1 and C dominates, so the impedance will
not exceed 1 kOhm. But that is fine for this purpose, because it is high compared to the coax's 50 ohm impedance.
The disadvantage compared to a realy inductor is the voltage drop across the circuit; e.g., at 100 mA there's already
1 volt across R3, plus the fixed 1.2 V over the transistor (which can be reduced by omitting R2). Furthermore, it can
be desirable to connect a small inductor in series with the circuit, to assure a sufficiently high impedance at high
frequencies where the gyrator does not work well anymore.
Text and pictures on this page are copyright 2015, P.T. de Boer, pa3fwm@amsat.org .
Republication is only allowed with my explicit permission.
pdfcrowd.com