The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots To Economic Growth
The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots To Economic Growth
The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots To Economic Growth
into
the failure
ment policies
in South
econo-
a book entitled
his investiga-
of economic
develop-
and Southeast
Asia.
however,
countries
Malaysia,
Thailand,
scene of Myrdals
and Indonesia
drama),
(the very
a very
an economic takeoff.
World Bank data on the average an-
different
South
nual growth
Korea,
kind of Asian
Taiwan,
Hong
drama:
Kong,
Japan,
and Singapore
product
Western countries,
the automobile
business
has suffered severely, and President Reagan
has had to violate his free-trade principles to
save the U.S. microchip
industry. It is true
that most of the competition
is from East,
rather than from South or Southeast Asia;
Kong,
also involved,
predicted
the staggering
and
the qualities
Economic
depends
an economic
of management
another
on
and Alan M.
in the American
of September
eco-
by Hollis B. Chenery
published
Review
countries,
but this
explanation
produce
nation.
sec-
better management
can
than
we
of culture.
performances
of Taiwan
and Ko-
exported
a population
Dragons
with a population
of
of 700 million.
Confucius.
unpredicted,
economists
have no explanation
of why these
of this article,
Colombia,
define culture
starting
position?
capita
income
Koreas
($150).
seemed
to be in a better
In 1965,
Colombias
South
per
twice South
Koreas per
one-and-a-
of the mind
although
The authors
as the collective
that distinguishes
the members
of one category of people from those of another. This definition applies to national as
well as to corporate
at the national
hypothesis
cultures,
of East Asia
they
like to
programming
if
held the
of
in-
Exhibit
196585
Ave.
7 965
Annual
GNP/capita
Growth
1985
GNP/capita
Rate
GNP/capita
U.S. $ and
U.S. $ and
(Rank)
(Rank)
Singapore
7.6
550 (12)
7420 (10)
Taiwan
7.2
220 (16)
3600 (12)
South Korea
6.6
150 (17)
2150 (13)
Hong Kong
6.1
590 (11)
6230 (11)
Japan
4.7
780 (10)
11300 (5)
Brazil
4.3
240 (15)
1640 (15)
Austria
3.5
1180 (8)
9120 (8)
Colombia
2.9
280 (14)
1320 (16)
West Germany
2.7
1810 (5)
10940 (6)
Canada
2.4
2260 (3)
13680 (3)
Netherlands
2.0
1520 (7)
9290 (7)
Sweden
1.8
2160 (4)
11890 (4)
1.7
90 (18)
270 (18)
States
1.7
3420 (1)
16690 (1)
Great Britain
1.6
1580 (6)
8460 (9)
Poland
1.5
840 (9)
2050 (14)
1.4
2310 (2)
16370 (2)
330 (13)
770 (17)
India
United
Switzerland
Nicaragua
-2.1
heritance
vantage
has constituted
for successful
Cultural
cally transferred;
a competitive
business
inheritances
ad-
activity.
are not geneti-
be ac-
Kong Fu Ze, whom the Jesuit missionaries renamed Confucius, was a high civil servant in
China around the time of 500 B.C. Known
for his wisdom,
by
ones thoughts,
ever, remain
free. Harmony
maintenance
of an individuals
how-
is found
in the
face, n mean-
self-respect,
and prestige.
Losing
ones dignity,
in the Chinese tradition,
is
equivalent
to losing ones eyes, nose, and
mouth. Social relations should
in such a way that everybodys
tained. Paying respect
called giving face.
GEERT HOFSTEDE
anthropology
management
of Limburg at Maastricht,
He is also director
moved
3. Virtuous
of orgmizutiorzui
and international
the University
Netherlands.
is professor
ut
the
of the Institute
Cooperation,
consultant
which,
however,
to cow-
toward
else is
others
con-
injunction
Confucius
internationally
to someone
behavior
be conducted
face is main-
As
love ones ene-
is not a religion
from what
rules
Confucius
being
Conspicuous
patient,
consumption
and
persevering.
is taboo,
Moderation
as is los-
is enjoined
in
of Confucian
teaching:
I. The stability of society is based on unequal relationships between people. The wu
are ruler/
lun, or five basic relationships,
subject,
brother,
father/son,
older brother/younger
husband/wife,
and older friend/
If culture
is as important
in determining
the
Mere description
will not do; we need an
approach that allows comparisons
between
countriesthat is, an identification
of cultural variations.
Cultural
differences
can be measured indirectly; that is, they can be inferred
from data about collective behavior, such as
the way a countrys national
wealth is distributed
over its population;
the mobility
from one social class to another; or the frequency of political violence or labor con-
flicts,
traffic
accidents,
or suicides.
about
should
All of
a countrys
be interpreted.
We can avoid this problem
of culture
by tak-
through
asking
well-designed
questions about peoples values
or beliefs. For this type of measurement,
we
should
have
respondents
access
to matched
from a number
samples
of different
the better,
of
coun-
but preferably
at
as possible
schoolchildren,
or business
cific
training
matched
representative
populations
though
female medical
stu-
can
samples
such as public
opinion
spesuch
to have
of Hong
national
polls, al-
countries.
In comparing
other.
form
from whole
least 30 or 40 questions
liefs
attending
all
It is not necessary
We usually
various
ten-
managers
courses
samples.
For example,
distinguish
We
methods
use
that
one
countries
of
in
the answers,
from
several
each
statistical
for this
Corporation
made
tional employee
its databank
attitude
academic
research.
worldwide
comparative
employees
since
116,000
on interna-
surveys available
surveys of its
questionnaires
for
holding
in 20. different
than
lan-
purpose; this procedure supplies us with suggested dimensions of culture on which we can
has succeeded,
countries.
such
If our research
dimensions
should
be
one particular
choice.
A unique opportunity
for culture measurement arose in the early 1970s when the IBM
companies,
but most of
such as earn-
ings, job security, challenge, freedom, cooperation, and so forth. In addition, questions
were included
on the preferred
ideal manager
faire).
Finally,
judgments
general
issues at work,
among
employees
than
good.
their
strongly
usually
does more
were
from
than
agree
represented
subsets
same
the corporation
they would
to
be a conservative
found
estimate
analysis
40 of them, ignoring
each
job,
nationality.
If
among counso the national
ex-
should be larger
be inside,
differences
from
company,
and education,
but different
anything,
cultural differences
culture
harm
to rate
targeted
for comparison
cultures
differed
covered,
the na-
possible
to use data
mainly
that these
along
four
dimensions:
1. Power
Distance-
members
to
oforganiza-
accept
represents
inequality
that
is defined
it suggests
is endorsed
that
by
to 53.
population:
tries outside
cultures
53
disagree.
well-matched
countrys
asked
strongly
to laissez-
while those of 14
such as Competition
Employees
responses
10 countries,
from another
unequal
2. Individualism
opposite
describes
integrated
experience
are basically
is aware
unequal,
but
than others.
(Collectivism)
on the other. This
the degree to which individuals
are
into groups.
On the individualist
of
culfuml variations.
is, an identification
in which
are loose:
Everyone
is ex-
to these cultural
the family:
Power Distance
by the degree to
which children
immediate
find societies
often
uncles,
aunts,
protecting
into strong,
their extended
and
cohesive
families
grandparents)
them in exchange
ing loyalty.
side, we
The word
in-
(with
continue
the cohesion
of the family
and Masculinity/Femininity
meaning:
It refers to the
with
the Confucian
earlier,
it will
Confucian
be
no
countries
fundamental
involving
uersus
all societies
its opposite,
in
Femi-
respect
to
by
and older
child.
we described
surprise
generally
one,
by
teachings
group, not to the state. Again, the issue addressed by this dimension
is an extremely
the world.
3. Masculinity
with
children
If we compare
in this
to have a will
other people,
for unquestion-
collectivism
are encouraged
present
bred in
that
score
neofairly
low on Individual-
The distribution
of roles between the
sexes is another fundamental
issue for any
society
ninity.
that
may
tions. Analysis
womens
involve
differ
less among
Further,
to mens values
of solu-
values
a range
a dimension
if we restrict
(which
to another),
that
societies
vary more
we find that
competitive,
and maximally
different from
womens values on the one side, to modest
and nurturing
and similar to womens values
on the other. We have called the assertive
masculine
nine.
and
the nurturing
The women
in the feminine
assertive
countries
pole
pole
femi-
countries
and competitive,
but not as
tainty Avoidance;
it indicates
a culture
its members
programs
uncomfortable
situations.
or comfortable
Unstructured
fined as novel,
unknown,
to what extent
to feel either
in unstructured
situations
are de-
surprising,
or dif-
by adhering
nervous
energy.
and are
Uncer-
tainty-accepting
cultures are more tolerant of
behavior and opinions that differ from their
own; they try to have as few rules as possible,
and on the philosophical
and religious level
they are relativist, allowing many currents to
flow side by side. People within these cultures
are more phlegmatic and contemplative;
their
environment
does not expect them to express
emotions.
Exhibit 2 lists scores for the 53 cultures in the IBM research, thereby permitting
11
(F.R
63
67
35
Chile
Colombia
Costa
68
3.5
France
Germany
37
33
45
54
Jamaica
Japan
52
34
13
50
49
19-20
10-11
8-9
15-16
2-3
27-28
42-44
42-44
15-16
46
8-9
51
42-44
17
24-25
39
14
20
53
41
Italy
28
Ireland
Rank
35-36
Israel
77
78
Indonesia
58
68
Hong Kong
Iran
95
Guatemala
India
60
Greece
35
33
Finland
Britain
78
Equador
Great
18
Denmark
Rica
69
65
Belgium
39
11
Austria
Canada
36
Australia
Brazil
49
Index
Power Distance
Argentina
Country
46
39
76
54
70
41
48
14
25
35
89
67
71
63
74
15
13
23
80
38
75
55
90
46
Index
22-23
25
19
12
24
21
47-48
37
53
30
15
10-11
17
52
46
49
38
4-5
26-27
18
22-23
Rank
Individualism
95
68
70
47
68
43
56
46
57
37
57
66
66
43
26
63
16
21
64
28
52
49
54
79
61
56
Index
7-8
4-5
29
7-8
35-36
20-21
30-31
18-19
43
18-19
9-10
9-10
35-36
47
13-14
50
48-49
11-12
46
24
27
22
16
20-22
Rank
Masculinity
92
13
75
81
35
59
40
48
29
101
112
35
65
86
59
67
23
86
80
86
48
76
94
70
51
86
Index
Uncertainty
52
23
19
47-48
31-32
45
41-42
49-50
47-48
29
10-15
31-32
28
51
10-15
20
10-15
41-42
21-22
5-6
24-25
37
10-15
Rank
Avoidance
IN IBMs
SCORESON
Exhibit
80
61
96
25
31
23
65
31
Index
Confucian
15-16
11-12
17
11-12
Rank
Dynamism
1
5-6
40
47-48
50
32
2-3
21-23
4
24-25
36-37
18-19
13
31
47-48
45
29-30
21-23
18-19
26
38
5-6
12
104
81
38
31
22
55
95
64
94
63
49
66
74
57
31
34
58
64
66
61
40
81
76
Malaysia
Mexico
Netherlands
Norway
New Zealand
Pakistan
Panama
Peru
Philippines
Portugal
South Africa
Salvador
Singapore
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Turkey
Uruguay
United
Venezuela
Yugoslavia
10-11
7
77
80
Arab Ctrs.
38
20
27
27
12
91
36
37
20
17
68
71
51
20
19
65
27
32
16
11
14
79
69
80
30
26
18
26-27
39-41
33-35
33-35
50
29
28
39-41
44
14
10-11
20
39-41
42
16
33-3.5
31
45
51
47-48
13
4-5
32
36
43
53
46
41
21
73
62
38
45
34
45
70
42
48
40
63
31
64
42
44
50
58
70
23
30-31
39
48-49
15
42
31-33
44
32-33
4-5
68
54
52
88
76
46
100
85
64
69
58
29
86
37-38
52
94
49
104
44
87
86
28
40
13-14
45
11-12
37-38
34
25-26
50
49
17
53
52
51
14
36
82
25-26
6
85
41
69
50
39
RankNumbers:
1 = Highest;
53 = Lowest(ForConfucian
Dynamism:20 = Lowest)
21-23
64
East Africa
West Africa
Regions:
States
27-28
60
Korea (S)
27
34
36
21-22
43
16-17
30
26
33
49-50
10-E
53
5-6
39-40
44
10-15
24-25
39-40
38
35
18
46
16-17
16
25
29
56
87
33
48
19
15-16
14
10
18
20
19
13
30
44
75
each country
to be positioned
four dimensions
on each of the
level,
differences
consequences
have
for management
prac-
and
affect
the type
of leadership
in a country.
The
greater
dem-
are large
Avoidance
is associated
At the national
dividualism
wealth
product
in dollars)
gross national
strongly
economic
and national
(peomore
individualist)
(indi-
vidualist
cultures
becoming
wealthier).
We
was surveyed
year interval,
changes
in both
wealth
and Individualism.
in a coun-
ties; incentives
employees group
should
around
tives should
affect
cultures,
as individuals,
people
can
and incen-
peoples
and Uncertainty
motivations:
AvoidCompeti-
in a masculine
culture,
countries
tend to be individualist)
ism associated
be given to individuals.
Masculinity
ance
loyal-
be given collectively,
should be left up to the
In Individualist
be moved
is more Individual-
the economy
it would
(all of which
if at least
growth
individuals
and personal risk is more acceptable if Uncertainty Avoidance is low. Power Distance and
Uncertainty
Avoidance
together affect the
image people form of what an organization
should be: larger Power Distances are associ-
economic
14
with
formalization.
At the company
er Uncertainty
Measurement:
students
material,
in addition
between
was
in both samples.
demonstrated
This overlap
in different
two projects
versality
on different
was strong
dif-
populations
The agreement
support
other concern:
by U.S.,
on the results.
Scandinavian
Western
British,
countries.
Our
data
evolved from
French,
and
of them from
The Rokeach
the local
from
pos-
language
the Chinese.
To
dience
as honoring
to, respect
of parents).
of ancestors
and obe-
Of course,
support
to the Chinese
mind,
unusual.
A statistical
analysis
of the 22-coun-
countries had
this conclu-
Dutch,
researchers-all
plained
directly
se-
Wherever
made
into
equally
the
of the research-
translations
overlapping
however,
the influence
culture
sible,
to 100
in a vari-
in each of 22 countries
between
ers own
the
is remarkable
used completely
sets of countries.
on
ferent questionnaires
ety of disciplines
were
overlap
data.
The
search
it appeared
in the IBM
Value Sur-
thus
were
been
relative importance
each value
attached
as opposed
in a country
to the other
to
values
the countries
the scores of
with
Our findings
different
ulations, different
mix of countries.
time periods,
different
pop-
and different
rately
reflect
the essence
of their
own
cul-
of the Chinese
Value
15
expected
seniors
social
behavior:
or juniors,
a function
behavior
toward
toward
more
and as
perseverance
and thrift), whereas those on
the right select Confucian
values oriented
the group,
tural choices
so fundamental
cul-
to any human
oriented
toward
toward
the future
the present.
by a Western
or an Eastern
truly universal
all societies
different
human
share
societies
mind.
They are
the same
problems,
but
different
solutions
ies, however,
is missing
Avoidance.
this dimension
a dynamic,
future-oriented
related
We earlier
to Un-
associated
We have
Dynamism
pole reflects
tradition-oriented
mentality.
Scores
for
pole reflects
mentality,
as its negative
One dimension
Confucian
to
these problems.
(especially
a more
Confucian
surveyed
wherestatic,
Dynamism
2. In dis-
we were stunned
to discover
another
all 22 countries,
or poor,
up of the values
indicated
For countries
dimension,
exhibit
countries
in Exhibit
scoring
made
3.
high on this
strongly
Confucian
that
associated
with
rich
Dynamism,
economic
is
growth
that
were
covered.
are relatively
scoring
more
important;
for
more important.
In fact, both the values on
the right and those on the left are in line with
the teachings of Confucius as we described
them earlier.
However,
The
that are
Kong,
Taiwan,
Japan,
Dynamism
scale.
on
The next
year.
ifi
only
p&y
ove&pping
sets
of counhies,
Exhibit
of:
Personal
(perseverance)
relationships
and observing
by status
Protecting
Sweden,
Reciprocation
of greetings,
favors, and gifts
a sense of shame
scores
position.
are found
for Brazil,
and Singapore.
On
the
English-speaking
the
lower
Dynamism
we find
Australia,
the African
countries
Nigeria;
New
Chinese
values
questionnaire
and perseverance
before the present boom
started; their belief in tradition
and face
composed
We learned
values
tries,
while
from
their
were preferred
other
values
in 22 counanswers
in some
were
that
coun-
preferred
in
clusters of
one of
Dyna-
were known
and
Japanese
and
and Pakistan.
peoples
developthey may
and
social scientists
some
(although
Britain,
Zimbabwe
States,
Canada;
the
of Confucian
ments caused
take a middle
side
countries
United
India,
The Netherlands,
Zealand,
your face
Having
Thailand,
of:
and stability
this order
Thrift
highest
steadiness
to value thrift
Dynamism
scale)
and economic
to be the effect.
The logical link between
the two is
We do not mean
rather,
the way
in which
we
culture.
It then appeared
that the country
scores on Confucian Dynamism derived from
this
exercise
are
strongly
associated
with
of the
17
a Westerner
important.
further.
would
not normally
find them
them
label
Confucian
could
be somewhat
countries
addition,
in the pursuit
of whatever
such
a number
economic
Low endorsement
mis-
of the values
in non-Confu-
dimension
as India
or Brazil.
In
values
including
goals.
of core Confucian
goals a per-
or herself,
nacity
leading.
tence or perseverance
facilitates
economic
growth.
shared
Pro-
as a con-
business.
mance.
for tradition
Having
should
issued
acknowledge
ordering
this disclaimer,
we
relationship
by status
and observ-
The
on
Dynamism
reciprocation
of greetings,
pedes
part
of the secret
which
they
technological
success
is the ease
accepted
Western
innovations.
Finally,
personal
steadiness
dualities
would discourage
the initiative,
and changeability
required
trying
trade.
the vicissitudes
and interrelatedness
conception
supports
shame
sensitivity
interrelatedness
to social
contacts.
of capital
ous asset
which
through
The value
means
for reinvestment,
to economic
growth;
human
of
avail-
an obvieconomists
and
stability,
to exploit
Culture
nomic growth;
sufficient
necessary
im-
of the
have
more con-
if overstressed,
risk seeking,
of entrepreneurs
of world
condition
culture
domifor eco-
alone is not
of a
velopment.
the growth
explains
why
started
only
18
China.
What
Value Sur-
the difference
Confucian
tioned
values
ples Republic,
remain
strong
in the Peo-
of our Confucian
Dynamism
currently
at the expense
boosted
dimension
are
of those on
The economic
Republic
The Cultural
was obviously
nevertheless,
growth
hampered
by politi-
Revolution
of 1966-
of economic
the average
the 20-year
and
Besides
East
(Power
Collectivism,
we found
annual
shrinkage;
rate of eco-
that included
West
Individualism/
Masculinity/Femininity)
Western
Avoidance.
dimension:
As we argued,
deals with
a societys
uncertainty-avoiding
this
search
cultures
for
believe
one uniquely
over
Confucian
Dynamism;
the Revolu-
dimension
deals with
period
Truth;
men-
to both
Distance,
one uniquely
dimension
and Eastern
previously
common
and
tell us about
Western
the three
dimensions
Uncertainty
cal factors.
minds?
Eastern
dimension,
we believe
a societys
for
Virtue.
relates
economic
purity.
expediency
It is obviously
prevail
over political
more difficult
to turn
It is no accident
that this
search
to the teachings
described
them earlier,
as we
he was a teacher
of
Truth
gions
most powerful-dragon
There
Eastern
Truth.
of them all.
open.
is a philosophical
thinking.
that
are very
Throughout
much
history,
currents
dividing
Western from
concerned
these
religions
fundamentalist,
that believe
with
in-
and lib-
It is remarkable
that the values dimension aswith the economic success of East
sociated
Asiatic cultures
This is a powerful
of how fundamental
illustration
a phenomenon
culture
19
eral, tolerant
humanity,
currents
also present
with
these technologies
into
cording
to their superior
synthetic
practice
ac-
abilities.
above doctrine.
These two trends
in thinking
corre-
than what works, and how the efforts of individuals with different thinking patterns can
Uncertainty-Avoidance
be coordinated
represented
dimension.
by Confucianism
Hinduism,
Buddhism,
The East,
but
Taoism,
also
Human
by
and Shinto-
be-
is seen
its opposite.
in the East
or philosophical
school
at the same
time;
and Buddhism,
for example,
coex-
Shintoism
toward a common
nese management,
employees,
especially
is famous
cultures
goal. Japa-
with Japanese
syn-
in this period
that practice
virtue
with-
out a concern for truth, is part of what our research has illustrated.
SYNERGY
can become
a cornerstone
West,
we tend to derive
where
ethics
from
religion.
During
that
the
has shaken
Industrial
mankind
concern
Revolution
company.
laws of nature,
of the
characters,
different
subsidiaries
within the same mulcorporation,
shows that national
first an asset.
lack of interest
different
tinational
for the sake of human progress. It is surprising that Chinese scholars, despite their high
level of civilization,
never discovered New-
syllable,
20
putting
business
Whether
of multicultural
Cultural
subsidiaries
like it or not,
are
differences
among
Such conflicts
headquarters
the subsidiaries,
the
in the
management.
porate policies.
between
they
of multinationals
national
over cor-
in
headquar-
with certain
rules by the
atively
culture-independent,
in marketing
diversity
and personnel,
is largest.
where
Multinational
cultural
corporate
be complementary.
Our experiences
with the
synergy,
because
an ex-
the survey
cultures handle cultural diversity among subsidiaries according to the level of Uncertainty
Avoidance
economic
treme
in their headquarters.
is the position
At one ex-
of cultural
synergy,
corporate truth, and we have it; at the opposite extreme the subsidiaries
are run at arms
exploitation
length,
ples. Although
without
much attempt
The president
differences
at integration.
we quoted
whom
was a wise
can easily
nized by overzealous
go unrecog-
headquarters
staff and
can be interpreted
as personality
defects of
the people in the subsidiaries,
whether they
are locals or expatriates.
National cultures
can undoubtedly
to recognize
portunity
Kahn
hypothesis
has formulated
in his book
the neo-Confucian
of economics
development
an article
Helm,
to predict
managers
local cultural
by George
we recommend
University
Press,
Hofstedes
of a relevant
description
of Organizational
(journal
1984).
article,
The
which
four
dimensions
Do American
(Organizational
Theories
Rokeach
Culture
the
Value
IBM
Dimensions:
in their
Harris Bond
the
modified
article
Hofstedes
An Independent
Validation
Value Survey
Cultural Psychology,
December
of The Chinese
con-
with
Abroad?
1980).
and Michael
studies
Study
Using Rokeachs
also a member
Summer
Dynamics,
Geert Hofstede
compared
and Organi-
Apply
entitled
for Culture-Free
(Journal of Cross1984).
Bond was
Culture
Connec-
Psychology,
of Culture
June 1987).
of the IBM
Cultures ConseHofstede
The Cultural
Practices
of International
zation:
Leadership,
to the psycho-
the idea
countries.
Such an attitude is a luxury that
the management
of a multinational
corporation can no longer afford.
(~oumal of Cross-Cultural
the author
1983).
1986),
This op-
Peo-
of Confucianism.
of the Chinese
of and references
Geert
studies
Issues 3 and 4,
Business Review),
The Psychology
aspects
RedMira-
tains discussions
logical
the
can be helped
patterns.
1979). On
or explain
devel-
to Eastern princi-
synergy,
originally
IBM studies
SEI.ECTEDBIBLIOGRAPHY
of technology
ing cultural
a case
is also
Rela-
and Theories
Busirzess Studies,
associated
with
Fall
the
If you wish