Sepep Written Report
Sepep Written Report
Sepep Written Report
SEPEP
WRITTEN
REPORT
By Tayla Moolman
Teaching Philosophy
As a health and physical education teacher I aim to educate and
influence students understanding and skills of health and physical
education. I aim to teach students about their body and movement
and also focusing on providing students with the opportunity to
learn and experience ways of movement, strategies and tactics, to
work as a team. With this I believe it will allow students to work on
their problem solving skills as a cohort.
I also aim to make physical education a safe environment where
children feel comfortable with being physically and emotionally
active. I will aim to encourage students to do their best, push them
to their limits to challenge themselves and most importantly try my
very best to make being physically active fun and enjoyable as well
as a learning experience.
Description of SEPEP
The Sport Education in Physical Education Program, otherwise
known as SEPEP is a model within the curriculum that is used in
physical education programs within schools.
SEPEP has been implemented in New Zealand, USA and Australia for
about a decade. The SEPEP programme has been put to the test,
Teachers Role
The Teachers in this particular class have an implementation level 2
and are aiming for level 3 implementation. The teachers take the
role before each practical lesson starts. Organized waterproof plastic
folders with a copy of the SEPEP roles defined, the rules, fixtures
and pens are given out to each team at the beginning of the lesson.
After the role has been taken, the students are now in charge and
responsible of running the lesson. Teachers will intervene when
needed. The teachers conclude the class with a reflection of the
lesson and improvements are talked about for the development into
the next lesson and comments are made from the sports board.
Competition Format
The competition format was of a round robin format so each team
could play one another. The competition format for this SEPEP
programme was chosen in regards to the sport, class size and
situation.
Outline any changes that may have occurred from your first
visit
1st Visit
Students were gathered outside the gym after they had gotten
changed to take the role and for an explanation of what needs to be
done throughout the lesson. The waterproof plastic files were then
sorted out between each team and all this took about 10 minutes.
The students were then told to move to the oval and take their own
warm ups as a team. My group noticed that the warm ups werent of
a high standard and the teachers were getting a bit agitated
because of this.
The set up of the fields was quite slow as the duty team was a little
confused as what they had to do and how to set up the fields as
they didnt have full sized fields, it was four modified sized fields.
20 minutes into the lesson the teachers werent happy with what
the students were doing so they stopped the class and brought
them all into a central area and had a chat with them about
correctly warming up and getting some game time.
10
Once the teachers were happy with the warm ups they brought
them in for a student from the duty team to announce the first
round fixtures.
We noticed the quality of skill was not at a high level, maybe only
two or three students from each team really knew how to play well.
As this was only the first lesson of the SEPEP programme it was kind
of expected by the teachers not to run at a high standard and they
were Year 10s so not much experience of peer teaching has been
had.
A positive to the lesson was that the pack up was quite fast and
efficient and the duty team did this.
As it was only the first lesson it was expected to go slow but as the
weeks go on improvements will hopefully be made with the time it
takes to set up and the quality of warm ups will increase.
Teachers could possibly put time limits on warm up and set up time
so students can get as much game time as possible instead of
wasting time setting up and trying to run a warm up session.
Rewards can be given for doing the correct things and
consequences if students arent doing what they are expected. A
point system could also be put in place for the duty team, as they
will not be playing in the games. Improvements will hopefully be
made as the students learn and become more efficient with each
lesson of the SEPEP programme.
11
2nd Visit
As it was ACC, some of the students in this class were away as well
as all three PE teachers. Three relief teachers were put with the
remaining students of this class.
The set up this time around was quicker but still not very efficient.
Some of the students got straight into the warm up where as others
were just fluffing around. After about 17 minutes of allowing the
duty team to set up the fields, collecting the necessary equipment
and warming up the students gathered together for a student from
the duty team to announce the fixtures for the first round.
As some of the students were away at ACC and teams were low on
numbers, Andrew and myself had the privilege of playing in a team
to fill up the numbers. From being able to play, I noticed that the
skill and rule knowledge and ability to play had improved from the
first visit.
The pack up again was quite fast and efficient. The teachers did not
seem to intervene much as they were only relief teachers but the
lesson did seem to flow well.
12