493 Gawker Objection To Daulerio Claims

16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 1 of 212
Main Document
Hearing Date and Time: December 29, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time)
Response Deadline: December 12, 2016 at 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time)
ROPES & GRAY LLP

Gregg M. Galardi
D. Ross Martin
Joshua Y. Sturm
Jonathan M. Agudelo
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-8704
Telephone: (212) 596-9000
Facsimile: (212) 596-9090
Counsel to the Debtors
and Debtors in Possession
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------x
:
In re
:
:
:
Gawker Media LLC, et al., 1
:
Debtors.
:
:
------------------------------------------------------x
Chapter 11
Case No. 16-11700 (SMB)
(Jointly Administered)
NOTICE OF DEBTORS OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO PROOFS OF

CLAIM NOS. 293, 294 AND 295 FILED BY ALBERT JAMES DAULERIO
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned have filed the attached Debtors
Omnibus Objection to Proofs of Claim Nos. 293, 294, and 295 Filed by Albert James Daulerio
(the Objection), which seeks to alter your rights by disallowing certain of your claims against
the above-captioned Debtors.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that a hearing on the Objection will take place
on December 29, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) before the Honorable Judge Stuart M.
Bernstein, at the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York,
1
The last four digits of the taxpayer identification number of the debtors are: Gawker Media LLC (0492); Gawker
Media Group, Inc. (3231); and Gawker Hungary Kft. (f/k/a Kinja Kft) (5056). Gawker Media LLC and Gawker
Media Group, Inc.s mailing addresses are c/o Opportune LLP, Attn: William D. Holden, Chief Restructuring
Officer, 10 East 53rd Street, 33rd Floor, New York, NY 10022. Gawker Hungary Kft.s mailing address is c/o
Opportune LLP, Attn: William D. Holden, 10 East 53rd Street, 33rd Floor, New York, NY 10022.
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 2 of 212
Main Document
Alexander Hamilton Custom House, One Bowling Green, New York, New York 10004-1408,
Courtroom No. 723.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that responses to the Objection and the relief
requested therein, if any, shall be in writing, shall conform to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure and the Local Bankruptcy Rules for the Southern District of New York, shall set forth
the basis for the response or objection and the specific grounds therefore, and shall be filed with
the Court electronically in accordance with General Order M-399 by registered users of the
Courts case filing system (the Users Manual for the Electronic Case Filing System can be
found at http://www.nysb.uscourts.gov, the official website for the Court), with a hard copy
delivered directly to chambers pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 9028-1 and served so as to be
actually received no later than December 12, 2016, at 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) (the Response
Deadline), upon: (i) the Debtors, Gawker Media LLC, c/o Opportune LLP, Attn: William D.
Holden, Chief Restructuring Officer, 10 East 53rd Street, 33rd Floor, New York, NY 10022
(wholden@opportune.com); (ii) counsel for the Debtors, Ropes & Gray LLP, 1211 Avenue of
the
Americas,
New
York,
New
York
10036,
Attn:
Gregg
M.
Galardi
(gregg.galardi@ropesgray.com); (iii) the Office of the United States Trustee for the Southern
District of New York, 201 Varick Street, Suite 1006, New York, NY 10014, Attn: Greg Zipes &
Susan Arbeit; (iv) the Internal Revenue Service, Attn: Centralized Insolvency Operation, 2970
Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (mimi.m.wong@irscounsel.treas.gov); (v) the United
States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York, Attn: Bankruptcy Division, 86
Chambers
Street,
3rd
Floor,
New
York,
NY
10007
(david.jones6@usdoj.gov;
Jeffrey.Oestericher@usdoj.gov; Joseph.Cordaro@usdoj.gov; Carina.Schoenberger@usdoj.gov);

(vi) counsel to Cerberus Business Finance, LLC, as DIP Lender, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, 919
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 3 of 212
Main Document
Third Avenue, New York, New York 10022, Attn: Adam C. Harris (adam.harris@srz.com);
(vii) counsel to US VC Partners LP, as Prepetition Second Lien Lender, Latham & Watkins LLP,
at both 330 North Wabash Avenue, Suite 2800, Chicago, IL 60611, Attn: David Heller
(david.heller@lw.com) and 885 Third Avenue, New York, New York 10022, Attn: Keith A.
Simon (keith.simon@lw.com); (viii) counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors,
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, 425 Lexington Ave., New York, NY 10017, Attn: Sandy Qusba
(squsba@stblaw.com) and William T. Russell (wrussell@stblaw.com); and (ix) parties that have
requested notice pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002.
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that if you do not timely file and serve a written
response to the relief requested in the Objection by the Response Deadline, the Bankruptcy Court
may deem any opposition waived, treat the Objection as conceded, and enter an order granting
the relief requested in the Objection without further notice or hearing.
[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank]
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 4 of 212
Main Document
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that a copy of the Objection may be obtained
free of charge by visiting the website of Prime Clerk LLC at http://cases.primeclerk.com/gawker.
You may also obtain copies of any pleadings by visiting the Courts website at
http://www.nysb.uscourts.gov in accordance with the procedures and fees set forth therein.
Dated: November 28, 2016

New York, New York
/s/ Gregg M. Galardi

ROPES & GRAY LLP
Gregg M. Galardi
D. Ross Martin
Joshua Y. Sturm
Jonathan M. Agudelo
New York, NY 10036-8704
Telephone: (212) 596-9000
Facsimile: (212) 596-9090
gregg.galardi@ropesgray.com
ross.martin@ropesgray.com
joshua.sturm@ropesgray.com
jonathan.agudelo@ropesgray.com
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 5 of 212
Main Document
Hearing Date and Time: December 29, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time)
Response Deadline: December 12, 2016 at 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time)
ROPES & GRAY LLP

Gregg M. Galardi
D. Ross Martin
Joshua Y. Sturm
Jonathan M. Agudelo
New York, NY 10036-8704
Telephone: (212) 596-9000
Facsimile: (212) 596-9090
------------------------------------------------------x
:
In re
:
:
:
Gawker Media LLC, et al., 1
:
Debtors.
:
:
------------------------------------------------------x
Chapter 11
Case No. 16-11700 (SMB)
DEBTORS OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO PROOFS OF

CLAIM NOS. 293, 294 AND 295 FILED BY ALBERT JAMES DAULERIO
Pursuant to sections 502(b), 502(c), and 502(e)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code and
Bankruptcy Rules 3001(e)(1) and 3007(d), Gawker Media LLC (Gawker Media), Gawker
Media Group, Inc. (GMGI), and Gawker Hungary Kft. (Gawker Hungary), as debtors and
debtors in possession (collectively, the Debtors) in the above-captioned cases (the Bankruptcy
Cases), hereby submit this objection (the Objection) to three proofs of claim (Nos. 293, 294,
Media Group, Inc. (3231); and Gawker Hungary Kft (f/k/a Kinja Kft.) (5056). Gawker Media LLC and Gawker
1
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 6 of 212
Main Document
and 295) (collectively, the Daulerio Claims) 2 filed by Albert James Daulerio (Daulerio).
The Daulerio Claims all assert liability resulting form the Debtors alleged duty to defend and
indemnify Daulerio in connection with his liability resulting from the Bollea Judgments (as
defined herein) and additional pending and potential lawsuits by Bollea (as defined herein)
against Daulerio. In support of this Objection, the Debtors respectfully represent and set forth as
follows.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1.
1334.
This Court has jurisdiction over the Motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157 and
Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1408 and 1409. The Motion is a core
proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157(b). The statutory predicates for the relief requested
herein are section 502 of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. 101, et seq. (the
Bankruptcy Code) and Rule 3001(e)(1) and 3007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure (the Bankruptcy Rules).
RELIEF REQUESTED
2.
By this Motion, the Debtors request entry of an order, substantially in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit A (the Proposed Order), (i) disallowing and expunging the Daulerio
Claims with respect to amounts asserted based on the Debtors duties to indemnify and defend
Daulerioother than costs of defending Daulerio in the Bollea I Lawsuit (as defined herein) that
have not already been paid by the Debtorsbecause the Debtors have no current liability to
Daulerio on account of such claims and any contingent future obligations should be disallowed
pursuant to section 502(e)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code and (ii) estimating for purposes of
allowance the potential future costs of defending Daulerio with respect to the Bollea I Lawsuit in
2
True and correct copies of the Daulerio Claims will be provided separately to the Court. Copies of the Daulerio
Claims will be provided to all other parties upon request.
2
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 7 of 212
Main Document
an amount up to the $100,000 amount of the Daulerio Punitive Damage Judgment (as defined
herein), which Gawker Media would be prepared to pay if and to the extent Bollea seeks such
payment.
BACKGROUND
I.
Daulerios Employment Agreement

3.
Daulerio was party to an employment agreement dated November 23, 2011 (the
Employment Agreement) with Gawker Entertainment, LLC (Gawker Entertainment). In

December 2012, Gawker Entertainment was liquidated in a corporate restructuring, and as a
result, Daulerio contends the Employment Agreement was assumed by Gawker Media and/or its
affiliated Debtors. Supplement to Daulerio Claims (Supp.) 33.i. 3
4.
That Employment Agreement included the following representations and
warranties by Daulerio (collectively, the Employment Representations):

a. The Work 4 will not violate . . . any rights of any person or entity, such as rights of
privacy or publicity.
b. The Work created by [Daulerio] for the Site does not and will not contain, publish or
display any libelous, defamatory, obscene or illegal content or material to the best of
[Daulerio]s knowledge.
c. Failure to comply with the undertakings in this Appendix will be a breach of this
Appendix and [Daulerios] Employment Agreement and will be deemed to adversely
affect Companys reputation.
Employment Agreement, Appendix A: Editorial Terms and Conditions (the Employment
Appendix) 16.
A copy of the Employment Agreement is attached as Exhibit 8 to the Daulerio Claims.
Work is defined to mean any and all content provided by Company, developed or conceived by [Daulerio] or
other employees, contributors, assistants and/or interns pursuant to and during employment. The Company is
defined to mean Gawker Entertainment, LLC
3
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
5.
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 8 of 212
Main Document
That Employment Appendix also contained two separate indemnification
provisions, the first one running from Daulerio to Gawker Entertainment and the second running
from Gawker Entertainment to Daulerio:
a. [Daulerio] agrees to indemnify and hold [Gawker Entertainment] harmless from and
against any judgments resulting from a breach or claimed breach by [Daulerio] of any of
[Daulerios] representations, warranties or covenants contained in the Employment
Agreement (including its Appendices). Strict Adherence to [Gawker Entertainment]
policies shall constitute a complete defense for [Daulerio] against any suggested breach
of his representations, covenants or warranties. Id., 19 (emphasis added) (the Daulerio
Indemnification Provision).
b. [Gawker Entertainment] agrees to indemnify and hold [Daulerio] harmless from and
against any judgments resulting from any claims arising from any content or images used
by [Daulerio] in accordance with [Gawker Entertainment]s content policies in force at
the time of such use. Furthermore, [Gawker Entertainment] undertakes to pay all legal
fees incurred by [Daulerio] in the event of a legal action resulting from any such content
that follows [Gawker Entertainment]s policies in force and at the time the content is
published. Id., 20 (the Company Indemnification Provision).
6.
The Employment Appendix provided that it would be governed by the laws of the
State of New York. Id. 23.

7.
As of January 2013, Daulerio was no longer employed by any of the Debtors or
their affiliates. Supp. 11.

II.
Summary of Relevant Litigation Proceedings

A.
The Bollea I Lawsuit
8.
The Daulerio Claims initially arise out of an article (the Bollea Article) written
by Daulerio and published by Gawker Media on October 4, 2012, commenting on a video (the
Bollea Video) depicting plaintiff Terry Gene Bollea (Bollea). As a result of the Bollea
Article, Bollea asserted causes of action for invasion of privacy by intrusion upon seclusion,
publication of private facts, violation of Florida common law right of publicity, intentional
infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress and violation of section
4
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 9 of 212
Main Document
934.10, Florida Statutes against each of Gawker Media, Mr. Nicholas Denton and Daulerio
(collectively, the Defendants) for damages (the Bollea I Lawsuit).
9.
On March 18, 2016, a jury entered its verdict finding the Defendants liable in
connection with the Bollea I Lawsuit (the Jury Verdict). 5 Specifically, the Jury Verdict found,
among other things, that (i) the Defendants, including Daulerio, had a specific intent to harm
Bollea when posting the Bollea Video online, id. 17, (ii) the Defendants, including Daulerio
intended to cause Bollea severe emotional distress or acted with reckless disregard of the high
probability of causing Bollea severe emotional distress, id. 9, (iii) the Bollea Video was posted
in such a manner as to outrage or cause mental suffering, shame or humiliation to a person of
ordinary sensibilities, id. 5, and (iv) the posting of the Bollea Video was extreme and
outrageous to a person of ordinary sensibilities, id. at 8.
10.
On June 7, 2016, the Florida state court entered final judgment holding the
Defendants jointly and severally liable for $115 million in compensatory damages (the
Compensatory Damage Judgment). In addition, the jury found that each of the Defendants
was liable for punitive damages to Bollea (the Punitive Damage Judgments, and together with
the Compensatory Damage Judgment, the Bollea Judgments) in the following amounts:
(i) Gawker Media in the amount of $15 million; (ii) Mr. Denton in the amount of $10 million;
and Daulerio in the amount of $100,000 (the Daulerio Punitive Damage Judgment). On June
10, 2016, the Defendants filed a notice of appeal from the Bollea Judgments.
11.
Gawker Media provided Daulerio with a defense in the Bollea I Lawsuit by
paying for the services of the law firm Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz LLP (LSKS) and the
law firm of Thomas & LoCicero to represent Daulerio. Gawker Media provided this defense
A copy of the jury verdict in the Bollea I Lawsuit is attached as Exhibit B hereto.
5
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 10 of 212
Main Document
from the suits inception through entry of the Bollea Judgments and the filing of the notice of
appeal. Supp. 22.
12.
On June 10, 2016, Gawker Media filed a voluntary petition for relief under
chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Since that date, the proceedings to enforce the Bollea
Judgments against Gawker Media have been stayed as a result of Gawker Medias chapter 11
case. On June 12, 2016, GMGI and Gawker Hungary each filed a voluntary petition for relief
under the Bankruptcy Code. The proceedings to enforce the Bollea Judgments against Mr.
Denton are also currently stayed as a result as of his commencing a separate chapter 11
bankruptcy case.
B.
The Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction Order
13.
Subsequent to the commencement of the Debtors chapter 11 cases, Bollea
continued to pursue the enforcement of the Bollea Judgments against Daulerio, and on August
17, 2016, the Florida state court entered an Order transferring certain of Daulerios assets to
Bollea (the Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction Order). 6 The Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction
Order found that:
Daulerio has rights, not exempt from execution, which may be applied towards
the satisfaction of the [Bollea Judgments, including the Daulerio Punitive Damage
Judgment], arising out of a GMGI and Gawker [Media] policy and practice,
pursuant to which they agreed to defend him against and to pay part or all of the
[final judgment] awarded to Mr. Bollea.
Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction Order, at Findings 11 (emphasis added) (the Daulerio
Indemnification Rights). Importantly, the Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction Order simply ruled
that Daulerios rights to have Gawker Media and GMGI pay part or all of the Bollea Judgments
were thereby transferred and assigned to Mr. Bollea and that Bollea was deemed to be the
A copy of the Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction Order is attached as Exhibit 4 to the Daulerio Claims.
6
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 11 of 212
Main Document
owner of the rights, with full power and authority to enforce said rights against Gawker [Media]
and GMGI. Id. at Order 1.
14.
The Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction Order specifically did not find that such
rights or the Claims asserted by Daulerio based on those rights were valid or actually enforceable
against GMGI or Gawker Media. Rather, the Florida court made clear in its findings that it did
not adjudicate the validity or enforceability of Daulerios rights against Gawker [Media] or
GMGI, so Mr. Bollea is only entitled to take ownership of Daulerios rights against Gawker
[Media] and GMGI, and to then seek enforcement of those rights . . . in their pending bankruptcy
proceedings. Id. Findings 13.
15.
On August 23, 2016, Daulerio filed a notice of appeal from the Daulerio
Judgment Satisfaction Order in the Floridas Second District Court of Appeal [Case No. 2D163721] seeking reversal of that Order. The Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction Order has not been
stayed.
C.
The Supplemental Daulerio Litigation
16.
Separate from the claims in the Bollea I Lawsuit complaint, on August 5, 2016,
Bollea filed a motion for sanctions in the Bollea I Lawsuit, solely against Daulerio, which was
later amended on October 13, 2016, to include a request for sanctions against LSKS in
connection with its representation of the Debtors and Daulerio (as amended, the Sanctions
Motion). 7 The Sanctions Motion seeks entry of an order imposing sanctions as a result of
Daulerios and/or his counsels material misrepresentations and entry of an order to show cause
why Daulerio and/or his counsel should not be held in contempt for hindering and obstructing
the administration of justice.
A copy of the Sanctions Motion is attached as Exhibit C hereto.
7
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
17.
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 12 of 212
Main Document
Further, on October 6, 2016, Bollea filed an emergency motion to enforce the
permanent injunction provided in the Bollea Judgments to prevent Daulerio from violating
Floridas Revenge Porn laws and engaging in video voyeurism and extortion, by requiring
Daulerio to immediately turn over any and all copies, excerpts and/or still images of all
surreptitiously recorded, sexually explicit recordings and images of Bollea (the Video Turnover
Motion and, together with the Sanctions Motion, the Supplemental Daulerio Litigation). 8 An
evidentiary hearing to consider these Supplemental Daulerio Litigation motions has been
deferred pending settlement negotiations [Docket No 49069512; Case No. 12012447 CI-011].
18.
Daulerio was not employed by the Debtors when the alleged actions giving rise to
the Supplemental Daulerio Litigation occurred and those actions do not directly relate to content
published by Gawker Media.
III.
The Debtors Plan And The Bollea Settlement

19.
On November 2, 2016, the Debtors filed their Disclosure Statement for Debtors
Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation for Gawker Media Group, Inc., Gawker Media
LLC, and Gawker Hungary Kft. [Docket No. 403] (as amended and including all exhibits and
supplements thereto, the Disclosure Statement) in support of the Amended Joint Chapter 11
Plan of Liquidation for Gawker Media Group, Inc., Gawker Media LLC, and Gawker Hungary
Kft. (as amended and including all exhibits thereto, the Plan). On November 4, 2016, this
Court entered an order, among other things, approving that Disclosure Statement [Docket No.
413] (the Disclosure Statement Order). In accordance with the Disclosure Statement Order,
the Debtors have commenced solicitation of acceptances and rejections on the Plan. A hearing to
consider confirmation of the Plan is currently scheduled for December 13, 2016.
A copy of the Video Turnover Motion is attached as Exhibit D hereto.
8
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
20.
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 13 of 212
Main Document
As described in the Disclosure Statement, the Debtors and Bollea agreed on terms
of a settlement (the Bollea Settlement). 9 If approved by the Court, the Bollea Settlement
would settle (i) the Bollea Judgments against Gawker Media, (ii) any and all other claims
asserted by Bollea against the Debtors, including Bolleas claim as the owner of any Daulerio
Indemnification Rights against GMGI and Gawker Media, (iii) Bolleas claim based on the
Compensatory Damage Judgment against Daulerio; and (iv) Bolleas claim based on the
Compensatory Damage Judgment against Mr. Denton. The Bollea Settlement also contemplates
that Bollea would release either or both of the remaining $100,000 Daulerio Punitive Damage
Judgment against Daulerio and the $10 million Punitive Damage Judgment against Mr. Denton,
and terminate proceedings on executing on the Daulerio Punitive Damage Judgment, if either or
both of Daulerio and Mr. Denton, respectively, enter into an agreement that provides that
Daulerio and/or Mr. Denton, respectively: (i) dismiss his appeals relating to the Bollea I Lawsuit,
(ii) return and assign any rights associated with certain content relating to the Bollea Video,
(iii) execute a proposed declaration attached to the Bollea Settlement, and (iv) execute mutual
releases with Bollea (the Proposed Supplemental Settlement). The Proposed Supplemental
Settlement would not require any payments by Daulerio or Mr. Denton. To date, Daulerio has
not accepted the Proposed Supplemental Settlement.
IV.
The Daulerio Claims

21.
On September 29, 2016, after entry of the Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction order,
Daulerio filed an identical, contingent claim against each of the three Debtors. Each Daulerio
Claim lists the amount of the claim at $6 million, but the supplement attached to each Daulerio
Claim explains that amount is an estimate only, based on legal fees incurred as of September
9
A copy of the Bollea Settlement agreement will be filed with the Court as part of the plan supplement
contemplated by the Plan.
9
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 14 of 212
Main Document
2016, potential future legal fees, amounts and value of Daulerios property seized by (and
transferred to) Bollea as of September 29, 2016, and potential future seizures by or on behalf of
Bollea. Supp. 32.
22.
The Daulerio Claims allege that these obligations arise from the Debtors duties
and obligations to:

a. defend Daulerio and pay legal fees and related expenses beginning on June 10, 2016, and
continuing into the future with respect to:
(i) defending the Bollea I Lawsuit (the Bollea Lawsuit Defense Costs);
(ii) defending Bolleas efforts to satisfy the Bollea Judgments (the Bollea Judgment
Defense Costs);
(iii) asserting and defending the Daulerio Claims (the Daulerio Claims Costs);
(iv) settling, or attempting to settle, the Bollea I Lawsuit (the Bollea Settlement
Costs); and
(v) protecting Daulerios interests in connection with the Bollea I Lawsuit (the
Daulerio Personal Interest Costs);
b. indemnify Daulerio with regard to the Bollea Judgments;
c. indemnify Daulerio with regard to future orders and/or judgments; and
d. indemnify Daulerio with regard to future settlements (the indemnification claims in
subsections b., c., and d., collectively, the Indemnification Claims). Id., 28-31.
The Daulerio Claims identify three potential sources of these claims against the Debtors: (i) the
Employment Agreement, (ii) general practice and policy of the Debtors set forth in the
declaration of William Holden 10 and Gawker Medias established course of providing a defense
10
A copy of such declaration is attached as Exhibit 7 to the Daulerio Claims (the Holden Declaration)
10
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 15 of 212
Main Document
to Daulerio since the inception of the Bollea I Lawsuit, and (iii) New York state law. Supp.
33.i.-iii. 11
OBJECTION
23.
Pursuant to section 502(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, a filed proof of claim is
deemed allowed unless a party in interest objects thereto. See 11 U.S.C. 502(a). Section
502(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code provides, in relevant part, that a claim may not be allowed to
the extent that it is unenforceable against the debtor and property of the debtor, under any
agreement or applicable law. See 11 U.S.C. 502(b)(1). As explained below and except as
noted, the Daulerio Claims should be expunged and disallowed for the following reasons:
a. Daulerio has not been the owner of any Indemnification Claims since the Daulerio
Judgment Satisfaction Order transferring those claims to Bollea was entered on August
17, 2006, so any proof of claim Daulerio filed thereafter with respect to such claims is
invalid under Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e)(2);
b. Even if any Indemnification Claims had not been transferred to Bolleaand they were
(i) upon approval by the Court of the Bollea Settlement, the Bollea Compensatory
Damage Judgment claims against Daulerio will be resolved so there can be no remaining
indemnification obligation with respect thereto and (ii) any contingent Indemnification
Claims for potential future judgments or settlements must be disallowed pursuant to
section 502(e) of the Bankruptcy Code;
c. The Jury Verdict makes clear that Daulerios publication of the Bollea Video violated his
Employment Representations and company policies, so (i) under the Daulerio
Indemnification Provision of the Employment Appendix, Daulerio is liable to indemnify
Gawker Media for resulting damages and (ii) the Company Indemnification Provision
does not provide indemnity or defense costs to Daulerio with respect to actions arising
from publication of the Bollea Video;
d. Daulerio never had any conceivable claims against GMGI or Gawker Hungary for
indemnification or a duty to defend because neither of those Debtors was a party to the
Employment Agreement (or even an employer of Daulerio), and neither had a policy or
practice of defending or indemnifying Gawker Media employees from claims such as
those in the Bollea I Lawsuit;
11
The Daulerio Claims cite the law of the state of New York as a basis for the asserted claims, Supp 33.iii., but
do not specify any particular statute or principle of New York lawand the Debtors are not aware of anythat
would independently create indemnification and/or defense obligations on any of the Debtors.
11
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 16 of 212
Main Document
e. Even if the Company Indemnification Provision created an obligation for Gawker Media
to indemnify and defend Daulerio with respect to the Bollea I Lawsuitand it did not
Daulerio still never had any basis for claims for indemnification or a duty to defend
arising out of the Supplementary Daulerio Litigation, filing of proofs of claim against the
Debtors, or any other claims that likewise (i) relate to activities that occurred after
Daulerio was no longer employed by Gawker Media and (ii) are outside the scope of the
Company Indemnification Provision;
f. Upon approval by the Court of the Bollea Settlement, the only judgment remaining
against Daulerio potentially subject to indemnification will be the $100,000 Daulerio
Punitive Damage Judgment (even though those Indemnification Claims are presently
owned by Bollea), and as a matter of New York public policy, the Daulerio Punitive
Damage Judgment is not subject to indemnification so Gawker Media has no remaining
duty to defend that sole remaining claim; and
g. Nevertheless, in the interest of avoiding dissipation of estate assets, Gawker Media is
prepared to pay the $100,000 amount of the Daulerio Punitive Damage Judgment, so the
Daulerio Claims should be allowed solely against Gawker Media, up to that amount, and
Daulerio should not be reimbursed additional amounts beyond his potential exposure to
defend the Bollea Judgments.
Accordingly, the Debtors request that the Court disallow all three of the Daulerio Claims, except
to the extent of allowing the Daulerio Claims solely against Gawker Media up to an amount of
$100,000 that Daulerio can demonstrate were actually incurred in connection with litigating the
Bollea I Lawsuit.
I.
Daulerio Is Not The Owner Of The Indemnification Claims

24.
As discussed in paragraphs 13 and 14 above, the Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction
Order stipulated that, to the extent Daulerio had any rights to indemnification from, or a duty to
defend by, the Debtors, those rights were transferred and assigned to Mr. Bollea and Mr.
Bollea [was] deemed to be the owner of the rights, with full power and authority to enforce said
rights against Gawker [Media] and GMGI. Id., at Order 1. That transfer occurred in August
17, 2016 upon entry of the Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction Order, which has not been stayed or
vacated.
12
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
25.
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 17 of 212
Main Document
Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e)(1) is therefore squarely on point. It provides that, [i]f
a claim has been transferred other than for security before proof of the claim has been filed, the
proof of claim may be filed only by the transferee or an indenture trustee. The entire premise of
Daulerio filing proofs of claim for the Indemnification Claims is therefore fatally flawed;
Daulerio was not the owner of those claims when he filed the Daulerio Claims. To the extent
that those Indemnification Claims exist at all, they were transferred to Bollea, who had sole
authority to file proofs of claim.
II.
Any Contingent Indemnification Claims Shall Be Disallowed Under Bankruptcy

Code Section 502(e)(1)
26.
The only current judgments against Daulerio for which Indemnification Claims
exist (had they not been transferred to Bollea, which they were) are the Bollea Compensatory
Damage Judgment against Daulerio and the Daulerio Punitive Damage Judgment. The first will
be resolved upon approval of the Bollea Settlement, and as discussed in Section VI below, the
Daulerio Punitive Damage Judgment is not indemnifiable as a matter of New York public policy.
The remaining Indemnification Claims with respect to future orders, judgments and/or
settlements are contingent claims that must be disallowed pursuant to section 502(e) of the
Bankruptcy Code. Similarly, section 502(e) also disallows any claim Daulerio may be trying to
assert to preserve additional claims in case of the contingency that the Daulerio Judgment
Satisfaction Order or one of the other judgments of the Florida state court are reversed or
modified on appeal.
27.
Specifically, section 502(e)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code provides, in relevant part,
that:
[T]he court shall disallow any claim for reimbursement or contribution of any
entity that is liable with the debtor ... to the extent that
(B) such claim for reimbursement or contribution is contingent as of the time of
allowance or disallowance of such claim.
13
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 18 of 212
Main Document
Thus, three elements must be met for a claim to be disallowed under section 502(e)(1)(B):
a. the claim must be for reimbursement or contribution;
b. the party asserting the claim must be liable with the debtor on the claim of a third party;
and
c. the claim must be contingent at the time of its allowance or disallowance.
In re Chemtura Corp., 436 B.R. 286, 292-293 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2010).
28.
Courts have consistently held that claims for indemnification, such as those at
issue in the Daulerio Claims, are encompassed by the first requirement of section 502(e)(1). See,
e.g., In re Wedtech Corp., 85 B.R. 285, 290 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1988); In re Caribbean Petroleum
Corp., Case No. 10-12553 (KG), 2012 WL 1899322, at *3 (Bankr. D. Del. May 24, 2012).
Courts also interpret co-liability under Section 502(e)(1)(B) broadly. The inquiry involves
whether a debtor could be co-liable with a third party on an underlying claim, not whether a
debtor is automatically liable. In re Chemtura Corp., 436 B.R. at 295 (citing In re Amatex
Corp., 110 B.R. 168, 171 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1990) (Congress clearly meant to include all
situations wherein indemnitors or contributors could be liable with the debtor within the scope of
502(e)(1)(B).)). The Daulerio Indemnification Claims assert that the Debtors would be coliable with Daulerio for any such indemnifiable judgments, so they would be included in the
second requirement of section 502(e)(1)(B). More importantly, the Bollea Judgments state that
the Defendants, including both Gawker Media and Daulerio, are jointly and severally liable.
Finally, no present indemnification obligations of any Debtor to Daulerio will remain after
approval of the Bollea Settlement, so any other Indemnification Claims are necessarily
contingent on filing of a future claim, settlement or judicial decision. Accordingly, the Daulerio
Claims for indemnification for any judgment or settlement (including in the Supplemental
14
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 19 of 212
Main Document
Daulerio Litigation) or any potential future claims, must be disallowed under section 502(e)(1) of
the Bankruptcy Code.
III.
Daulerios Violation Of His Employment Representations Makes Him Liable To

Gawker Media; Daulerio Is Not Entitled to Indemnification Or Defense For Claims
Arising From That Violation
29.
Any consideration of indemnification claims between Gawker Media and
Daulerio has to begin with consideration of the specific indemnification provisions in the written
agreement between the parties. As set forth in paragraph 5 above, the first indemnification
provision in the Employment Appendix provides that Daulerio indemnifies and holds Gawker
Media harmless from and against any judgments resulting from a breach or claimed breach
by Daulerio of any of Daulerios representations, warranties or covenants in the Employment
Agreement and Appendix.
Employment Appendix 19 (emphasis added).
Those
representations, warranties and covenants include representations that (i) content and materials
developed by Daulerio pursuant to and during employment (the Work) would not violate any
rights of any person or entity, such as rights of privacy or publicity, id. 16.a., and (ii) Work
created by Daulerio for the gawker.com website will not contain, publish or display any
defamatory, obscene, or illegal content or materials to the best of [Daulerio]s knowledge, id.
16.b.
30.
The claims in the Bollea I Lawsuit fit well within that indemnification
requirement merely by claiming that Daulerio published private and confidential information,
invaded Bolleas privacy by intrusion, violated Bolleas common law right of publicity, and
intentionally and negligently inflicted emotional distress. The specific findings set forth in the
Jury Verdict and noted in paragraph 9 above make clear that Daulerio had, in fact, breached his
15
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 20 of 212
Main Document
Employment Representations in a number of ways by publishing the Bollea Video. 12 As a result

of the willful and intentional conduct of Daulerio, Gawker Media is subject to compensatory
damages in the amount of $115 million and punitive damages in the amount of $15 million.
Accordingly, absent the Bollea Settlement, Daulerio would be required to indemnify Gawker
Media for some or all of the $130 million in damages awarded to Bollea from Gawker Media
arising from Daulerios breach of his Employment Representations.
31.
Further, the Employment Agreement expressly provides that Daulerio is only
entitled to indemnification or a duty to defend with respect to claims arising from any content or
images used by Daulerio in accordance with Gawker Entertainments content policies in force at
the time of such use. With respect to the judgments in the Bollea I Lawsuit, Daulerio seems to
contend that the fact that the Florida state court held Gawker Media liable for the acts of
Daulerio that gave rise to the Bollea Judgment and the Daulerio Punitive Damage Judgment
means that the trial court in the Bollea case adjudged Daulerios acts to have been within the
scope of his employment. Supp 14. While the Debtors do not dispute the fact that the
conduct occurred during Daulerios employment, the conduct that gave rise to the Daulerio
Claims simply cannot fall within the scope of employment if that is intended to mean Daulerio
is entitled to indemnification for the Daulerio Punitive Damages Judgment. Specifically, in
finding that Daulerio was liable for punitive damages, the jury found that Daulerio, among other
things, (i) had a specific intent to harm Bollea when posting the Bollea Video online, id. 17,
(ii) intended to cause Bollea severe emotional distress or acted with reckless disregard of the
high probability of cause Bollea severe emotional distress, id. 9, (iii) the Bollea Video was
12
The Daulerio Indemnification Provision allows that strict adherence to Gawker Entertainment policies constitutes
a complete defense against any suggested breach of Daulerios representations, covenants or warranties, Id., 19,
but Daulerio makes no assertion to support an inference that his actions were in strict adherence to Gawker
Entertainments policies.
16
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 21 of 212
Main Document
posted in such a manner as to outrage or cause mental suffering, shame or humiliation to a

person of ordinary sensibilities, id. 5, and (iv) posting of the Bollea Video was extreme and
outrageous to a person of ordinary sensibilities, id. at 8. Plainly, such conduct could not be
within the content policies in force at Gawker Media at the time of the Bollea Article.
32.
In the presence of the written Employment Agreement, the Daulerio Claims do
not allege any facts supporting an unwritten historical policy and practice of Gawker Media that
would modify the clear written terms of that Employment Agreement to pay to defend or
indemnify employees from defamation claims.
Moreover, even assuming Daulerio could
establish that an unwritten policy and practice modified his written Employment Agreement, that
unwritten policy and practice was simply to defend employees with respect to the articles they
wrote and pay judgments if and to the extent that Gawker Media was also jointly and severally
liable for the judgment. In no prior situation, however, had Gawker Media paid a judgment
levied solely against an employee and certainly none in which an employee was liable for
punitive damages.
IV.
Daulerio Does Not Have Any Claims Against GMGI And Gawker Hungary
33.
As set forth above, Daulerio has filed claims against GMGI and Gawker Hungary,
as well as Gawker Media. His Claims against GMGI and Gawker Hungary are simply without
basis.
34.
First, the Daulerio Claims assert that Gawker Medianot Gawker Hungary or
GMGIassumed the obligations under his Employment Agreement with Gawker Entertainment.
Supp.
10.
GMGI and Gawker Hungary are therefore not parties to the Employment
Agreement nor employers of Daulerio. Daulerio therefore has not, and cannot, allege that either
of those Debtors assumed Gawker Entertainments obligations under the Employment
17
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 22 of 212
Main Document
Agreement, so he has no contractual basis upon which his claims against GMGI or Gawker
Hungary can properly rest.
35.
Second, Daulerio has offered nothingnor could heto establish a prima facie
case that GMGI or Gawker Hungary had a practice or policy of indemnifying Gawker Media
writers, editors or the like. GMGI was a holding company with no employees, and Gawker
Hungarys employees were not writers, editors or the like, but instead were primarily responsible
for the intellectual property and website design. Moreover, although Daulerio attempts to rest
these claims on the Holden Declaration, any such reliance is misplaced. Specifically, the Holden
Declaration states that there was a practice and policy of indemnification pursuant to which the
Debtor defends and indemnify their (sic) writers and editorial staff in connection with lawsuits
related to the Companys web content. Holden Decl. 24. The Holden Declaration defines
Debtor to refer solely to Gawker Media and Company to refer to GMGI and Gawker Media
collectively. Id. 1. Thus, the policy and practice was that of Gawker Media, not GMGI and
Gawker Hungary. Consequently, Daulerios Claims against GMGI and Gawker Hungary cannot
rest on a policy and practice that GMGI and Gawker Hungary simply did not have.
36.
Finally, although not cited by Daulerio, it is the case that in June 2016, the GMGI
board of directors approved a resolution authorizing, but not directing, any authorized officer to
take any actions necessary, appropriate, proper, or desirable in the interest of [GMGI] in
connection with the chapter 11 case, with such determination to be conclusively evidenced by
such execution or taking of such action, to indemnify any Employee Defendant up to the full
amount of their costs and expenses in connection with any future GMGI-related lawsuit. 13 For
purposes of the resolution, Employee Defendants were defined to include writers and editors
13
A copy of the relevant GMGI resolution is attached as Exhibit E hereto.
18
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 23 of 212
Main Document
who are named as defendants in civil actions, in connection with their work for [GMGI]. This
resolution, however, was not meant to retrospectively address the Bollea I Lawsuit and the
Bollea Judgments. As the evidence at the hearing on the Objection will establish, GMGI was not
assuming responsibility for the then-pending Bollea I Lawsuit or the Bollea Judgments. Instead,
GMGI was addressing the reality that it believed that Mr. Thiel was funding additional litigation
against Gawker Media and its current writers and editors. See, Motion of the Debtors for Leave
Pursuant to Rule 2004 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure to Conduct Discovery
Concerning Potential Plan Issues and Potential Causes of Action, and to Establish Discovery
Response and Dispute Procedures [Docket No. 341].
In an effort to maximize value by
maintaining Gawker Medias current workforce of editors and writers during the sale process,
GMGI intended to exercise discretion to indemnify and defend the writers in certain thenexisting (e.g., Ayyadurai, Terrill, and Huon) and threatened future litigation. 14
V.
Daulerio Has No Claims Relating To The Supplemental Daulerio Litigation, Filing

Of Proofs Of Claim Against the Debtors, Or Any Future Suits Based On Actions
Following The Conclusion Of His Employment By Gawker Media
37.
To begin with the obviousthe Employment Agreement covered only actions
and conduct taken by Daulerio in the course of his employment by Gawker Media. Daulerios
employment by Gawker Media concluded in January 2013. Consequently, to the extent that the
Daulerio Claims request indemnification or defense for conduct or actions Daulerio took after
January 2013, the Daulerio Claims must be disallowed.
38.
Moreover, the Company Indemnification Provision, upon which Daulerio
apparently relies, provides only an undertaking to pay legal fees in an action relating to website
content; it does not provide that Gawker Media will pay for Daulerio to hire separate counsel to
14
In that regard, Mr. Dentons indemnification rights are very different. He had contracts with GMGI and Gawker
Media that provided him with express rights to indemnification and defense.
19
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 24 of 212
Main Document
file proofs of claim against the Debtors estates in bankruptcy proceedings. And Daulerio does
notand cannotallege that Gawker Media had a policy and practice to indemnify or defend
former employees for actions taken after their employment. It therefore follows that Daulerio is
simply not entitled to indemnification or defense costs for the Supplemental Daulerio Litigation,
Bollea Judgment Defense Costs, the Daulerio Claims Costs, and the Daulerio Personal Interest
Costs, or any other claims for actions Daulerio took subsequent to his employment by Gawker
Media.
VI.
Gawker Media Has Discharged Any Obligation It Has To Daulerio Because The
Daulerio Punitive Damage Judgment Is Not Indemnifiable As A Matter of Public
Policy
39.
Notwithstanding the fact that the Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction Order divested
Daulerio of any indemnification rights with respect to the Bollea Judgments, Gawker Media did
not abandon its responsibilities to Daulerio. Gawker Media has in fact discharged all of its
existing obligations under the Employment Agreement. Specifically, as Daulerio readily admits,
Gawker Media paid all of the legal costs related to the Bollea I Lawsuit through the appeal of the
Bollea Judgments on June 10, 2016. Supp 22. Moreover, pursuant to the Bollea Settlement,
Gawker Media is satisfying not only the Bollea Judgments as they apply to Gawker Media, but
also the $115 million Compensatory Damage Judgment against Daulerio.
40.
With respect to the Daulerio Punitive Damages Judgment, Daulerio is not entitled
to indemnification or the associated duty to defend as a matter of public policy. The Daulerio
Claims assert that they arise under New York law, which expressly governed the Employment
Appendix. Id. 23. Public policy of New York precludes indemnification for punitive damages
whether the punitive damages are based on intentional actions or actions which, while not
intentional, amount to gross negligence, recklessness, or wantonness or conscious disregard of
the rights of others or for conduct so reckless as to amount to such disregard. Home Ins. Co. v
20
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 25 of 212
Main Document
American Home Prods. Corp., 75 NY2d 196, 200 (1990) (internal citations omitted). The New
York Court of Appeals has stated that to allow indemnification of such damages would defeat
the purpose of punitive damages which is solely to punish the offender and to deter similar
conduct on the part of others. Zurich Ins. Co. v Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 84 NY2d 309,
316 (1994).
41.
Nor should New York public policy be disregarded because a punitive damages
award has been rendered in another state. Home Ins. Co., 75 NY2d at 201. The New York Court
of Appeals formulated a two-part test to decide whether an out-of-state punitive damages
judgment is indemnifiable under New York law. First a court examines the nature of the claim,
including the degree of wrongfulness for which damages were awarded in the foreign State to
determine whether the award may be considered punitive in nature. The court must then
examine the other States law and policy relating to punitive damages in order to properly
ascertain whether reimbursement would offend New York public policy. Id.
42.
Under Florida law, the purpose of punitive damages is not to further compensate
the plaintiff, but to punish the defendant for its wrongful conduct and to deter similar misconduct
by it and other actors in the future. WR. Grace & Co. v Waters, 638 So. 2d 502, 504 (Fla.
1994). In Florida, the law is well settled that [p]unitive damages are appropriate when a
defendant engages in conduct which is fraudulent, malicious, deliberately violent or oppressive,
or committed with such gross negligence as to indicate a wanton disregard for rights of others.
Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. v Ballard, 749 So. 2d 483, 486 (Fla. 1999); see also BDO
Seidman, LLP v Banco Espirito Danto Inti., 38 So. 3d 874 (Fla. 2010); Hardiman v. Stevens,
2011 WL 1480401 (M.D. Fla. 2011).
21
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
43.
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 26 of 212
Main Document
There is no significant difference between the law of New York governing
punitive damages and comparable law in Florida. Under both States laws, the purpose of
punitive damages is the same, namely, to punish conduct having a high degree of moral
culpability and to serve as a warning to others in the future. Thus, conduct such as that for which
the jury found Daulerio guilty and awarded punitive damages, would also support a jury verdict
in New York awarding punitive damages. It therefore follows that indemnification coverage for
the punitive damages awarded in the Bollea I Lawsuit would be contrary to New York public
policy. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, et al. v. BDO Seidman LLP, 2012 WL 3115581 (N.Y.
Sup. July 27, 2012).
44.
The fact that there is an appeal of the Daulerio Punitive Judgment pending before
the Florida state court of appeals does not preclude a determination on whether Daulerios claims
are indemnifiable. Daulerio has presented no reason for this court to question the regularity of
the Florida judgment awarding punitive damages or the legitimacy of the Florida judgment
awarding punitive damages. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, et al. v. BDO Seidman LLP at 9.
More importantly, under the particular facts present here, Daulerio is not entitled to costs for
pursuing the appeal of the Daulerio Punitive Damages Judgment because that will be the sole
claim remaining in the Bollea I Lawsuit after the Bollea Settlement resolves the Compensatory
Damage Judgment, and Gawker Media cannot be required to continue providing a defense for
claims it is not required to indemnify. See, e.g., Allstate Ins. Co. v. Mende, 176 A.D.2d 907, 908,
575 N.Y.S.2d 520, 522 (1991) (affirming declaratory judgment that, following settlement of
covered claims, insurance company no longer had any duty to defend and indemnify defendants
for claims not covered by the insurance policy); Schnipper v. Home Indem. Co., 99 A.D.2d 959,
22
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 27 of 212
Main Document
960, 472 N.Y.S.2d 653, 655 (1984) (insurer obligated to provide defense to insured against
complaint up until time complaint was amended to drop the only claim within policy coverage).
45.
Even without remaining legal obligations, Gawker Media negotiated with Bollea
to provide for the option of the Proposed Supplemental Settlement that would resolve Bolleas
claim against Daulerio for punitive damages without any cost to Daulerio. While Daulerio is
certainly free to pursue his rights, Gawker Media cannot be required to fund litigation pursuing
only the reversal of a punitive damage judgment not subject to indemnification. 15
VII.
Claims For Litigation Fees And Expenses In Connection With Appealing The Bollea
Judgments Should Be Estimated For Allowance In The Amount of $100,000, Solely
Against Gawker Media
46.
Gawker Media acknowledges that it is obligated to pay reasonable expenses in
connection with defending Daulerio in the Bollea I Lawsuit, and has done so by paying counsel
for Daulerio through the notice of appeal of the Bollea Judgments on the date of Gawker Medias
bankruptcy filing. As set forth above, neither the Employment Agreement nor any policy and
practice obligates Gawker Media to pay for defense of claims against Daulerio arising from
actions and/or omissions by Daulerio when he was no longer a Gawker Media employee.
47.
To the extent that the Company Indemnification Provision requires Gawker
Media to protect Daulerio from claims relating to publication of content on its websites, Gawker
Media has done that. Gawker Media has also obtained for Daulerio the option to dispose of all
of Bolleas claims against him for no cost, in exchange for return of the Bollea Video and mutual
releases, which Daulerio has thus far declined.
Daulerios Employment Agreement never
contemplated that Gawker Media would be required to pay counsel fees to allow Daulerio to
15
To the extent Daulerio is successful, he could seek to be reimbursed for the costs of his appeal; however, as set
forth in section II, any such indemnification claim should be disallowed under section 502(e) of the Bankruptcy
Code.
23
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 28 of 212
Main Document
retain possession of a sex tape subject to a Florida court injunction or fund Daulerios efforts to
establish First Amendment precedent.
48.
Thus, to avoid permitting Daulerio to dissipate estate assets for personal reasons
through uneconomic litigation that prejudices holders of Allowed general unsecured claims
against Gawker Media, the Debtors request that the Court limit the allowed amount, if any, the
Daulerio Claims to $100,000, the amount of the Daulerio Punitive Damage Judgment, solely
against Gawker Media. The Debtors maintain that such amount is fair and reasonable under the
circumstances and consistent with section 502(c) of the Bankruptcy Code. Specifically, section
502(c) clearly permits this Court the authority to estimate unliquidated claims and provides it
with wide latitude in doing so. In re Chemtura Corp., 448 B.R. 635, 648 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
2011) (noting bankruptcy courts wide discretion in estimating claims). As a result of the Bollea
Settlement, the most that Daulerio may be financially liable is the amount of the Daulerio
Punitive Damage Judgment. Therefore, any reasonable claim Daulerio might have for payment
of legal fees and expenses going forward must reflect the indisputable fact that Daulerio is
ultimately only financially liable for $100,000. Therefore, while Daulerio may stand on his
contractual rights, under New York law a covenant of good faith exist in every contract. ABN
AMRO Bank, N.V. v. MBIA Inc., 17 N.Y.3d 208, 228-29 (2011) (The implied covenant of good
faith and fair dealing embraces a pledge that neither party shall do anything which will have the
effect of destroying or injuring the right of the other party to receive the fruits of the contract.).
In the present circumstances, the covenant of good faith cannot countenance a reading of the
Employment Agreement to permit Daulerio to incur fees and expenses in an amount in excess of
the Daulerio Punitive Damage Judgment, and impose those excess fees and expenses on Gawker
Media and its unsecured creditors, when Gawker Media is willing to pay the Daulerio Punitive
24
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 29 of 212
Main Document
Damage Judgment to avoid such fees and costs. Accordingly, the Daulerio Claim should be
allowed at no more than $100,000.
RESPONSES TO THIS OBJECTION
49.
Any responses to this Objection must be filed on or before 4:00 p.m. (New York
Time) on December 12, 2016, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the notice of this
Objection.
RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
50.
Neither the filing of this Objection nor entry of the Proposed Order shall affect
any rights of the Debtors, their estates, the Plan Administrator, or any other party in interest in
these chapter 11 cases to object to the Daulerio Claims for any purposes, including, without
limitation, allowance and distribution under the Plan.
51.
The Debtors and their estates reserve any and all rights to amend, supplement or
otherwise modify this Objection or the Proposed Order. The Debtors and their estates also
reserve any and all rights, claims and defenses with respect to any and all of the Daulerio Claims,
and nothing included in or omitted from this Objection or the Proposed Order is intended or shall
be deemed to impair, prejudice, waive or otherwise affect any rights, claims, or defenses of the
Debtors and their estates with respect to the Daulerio Claims.
NOTICE
52.
Notice of this Objection has been provided to: (i) the Office of the United States
Trustee for the Southern District of New York; (ii) Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, counsel to
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Gawker Media LLC, et al.; (iii) Latham &
Watkins LLP, counsel to US VC Partners LP, as Second Lien Lender; (iv) the address of the
Claimant, provided on the Daulerio Claims; and (v) all parties requesting notice in these chapter
25
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 30 of 212
Main Document
11 cases pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002. The Debtors respectfully submit that further notice
of this Objection is neither required nor necessary.
WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth herein, the Debtors respectfully request
that the Court (a) enter the Proposed Order, and (b) grant such other and further relief as may be
just and proper.
Dated: November 28, 2016
New York, New York
/s/ Gregg M. Galardi

ROPES & GRAY LLP
Gregg M. Galardi
D. Ross Martin
Joshua Y. Sturm
Jonathan M. Agudelo
New York, NY 10036-8704
Telephone: (212) 596-9000
Facsimile: (212) 596-9090
gregg.galardi@ropesgray.com
ross.martin@ropesgray.com
joshua.sturm@ropesgray.com
jonathan.agudelo@ropesgray.com
26
59757611_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 31 of 212
EXHIBIT A
Proposed Order
59757611_9
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 32 of 212

------------------------------------------------------x
:
In re
:
:
1
Gawker Media LLC, et al.,
:
:
Debtors.
:
:
------------------------------------------------------x
Main Document
Chapter 11
Case No. 16-11700 (SMB)
ORDER GRANTING DEBTORS FIRST OMNIBUS OBJECTION

TO PROOFS OF CLAIM FILED BY ALBERT JAMES DAULERIO
Upon the objection (the Objection) of Gawker Media LLC (Gawker Media), Gawker
Media Group, Inc. (GMGI), and Gawker Hungary Kft. (Gawker Hungary) as debtors and
debtors in possession (collectively, the Debtors) in the above-captioned cases (the Bankruptcy
Cases), for entry of an order (the Order) disallowing Proof of Claim Nos. 293, 294, and 295
filed by Albert James Daulerio (the Daulerio Claims); and the Court having found that the
Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157 and 1334; and the Court
having found that this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157(b)(2); and the Court
having found that venue of this proceeding and the Objection in this district is proper pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 1408 and 1409; and the Court having found that the relief requested in the
Objection is in the best interests of the Debtors estate, their creditors, and other parties in
interest; and the Court having found that the Debtors provided appropriate notice of the
Objection and the opportunity for a hearing on the Objection under the circumstances; and the
Court having reviewed the Objection and having heard the statements in support of the relief
Media Group, Inc. (3231); and Gawker Hungary Kft. (f/k/a Kinja Kft) (5056). Gawker Media LLC and Gawker
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 33 of 212
Main Document
requested therein at a hearing before the Court (the Hearing); and the Court having determined
that the legal and factual bases set forth in the Objection and at the Hearing establish just cause
for the relief granted herein; and upon all of the proceedings had before the Court; and after due
deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
The Objection is sustained as set forth herein. All capitalized terms used but not
defined herein shall have the meanings attributed to such terms in the Objection.
2.
The Daulerio Claims are Allowed, solely against Gawker Media, up to an amount
of $100,000 that Daulerio can demonstrate was actually incurred in connection with litigating the
Bollea I Lawsuit.
3.
All of the remaining Daulerio Claims are disallowed in their entirety.
4.
Prime Clerk LLC, the Court-appointed claims agent in these Chapter 11 Cases, is
hereby authorized and directed to make such revisions to the official claims register as are
necessary to reflect the disallowance of the Daulerio Claims.
5.
The Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to implement this Order.
6.
The Court retains exclusive jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or
related to the implementation of this Order.

New York, New York
Dated: ____________, 2016
THE HONORABLE STUART M BERNSTEIN
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 34 of 212
EXHIBIT B
Jury Verdict
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 35 of 212
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 36 of 212
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 37 of 212
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 38 of 212
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 39 of 212
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 40 of 212
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 41 of 212
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 42 of 212
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 43 of 212
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 44 of 212
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 45 of 212
EXHIBIT C
Sanctions Motion
Main Document
Doc10/13/2016
493 Filed05:09:46
11/28/16 PM
Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12 Main Document
Filing # 16-11700-smb
47600095 E-Filed
Pg 46 of 212
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
TERRY GENE BOLLEA professionally
known as HULK HOGAN,
Case No. 12012447 CI-011
Plaintiff,
vs.
GAWKER MEDIA, LLC aka GAWKER
MEDIA; NICK DENTON; A.J. DAULERIO,
Defendants.
______________________________________/
BOLLEAS AMENDED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND FOR
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AGAINST DAULERIO AND HIS COUNSEL
Plaintiff, Terry Bollea known professionally as Hulk Hogan (Mr. Bollea), by counsel,
moves this Court for an order imposing sanctions against Defendant A.J. Daulerio
(Mr. Daulerio)1 and his counsel, Levine, Sullivan, Koch & Schultz, LLP (LSKS), because
they knowingly and routinely misled the jury, this Court and Mr. Bollea about central issues in
this case, concealed and misrepresented material facts, and engaged in a scheme to improperly
influence the trier of fact and interfere with the proper administration of justice. The grounds
upon which this motion is based are as follows:
Introduction
It is axiomatic that the integrity of the civil litigation process depends on truthful
disclosure of facts. Morgan v. Campbell, 816 So.2d 251, 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (citing Cox
v. Burke, 706 So.2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Indeed, few wrongs strike more viciously
against the integrity of our system of justice than subverting the truth. Empire World Towers,
1
Because of their bankruptcy proceedings and the associated automatic stays, Mr. Bollea does not seek any relief
against Defendants, Gawker Media, LLC and Nick Denton. Mr. Bollea fully reserves his right to do so upon the
lifting of the stay(s).
{BC00103624:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 47 of 212
Main Document
LLC v. CDR Creances, S.A.S., 89 So.3d 1034, 1038 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). That is why, on the
spectrum of sanctionable conduct, perjury is perhaps the most egregious.
Id.
Perjury,
regardless of the setting, is a serious offense that results in incalculable harm to the functioning
and integrity of the legal system as well as to private individuals. Ramey v. Haverty Furniture
Companies, Inc., 993 So.2d 10114, 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (citing U.S. v. Holland, 22 F.3d
1040, 1047 (11th Cir. 1994)).
The Defendants in this case, including Mr. Daulerio, at least outwardly acknowledged the
importance of being honest.
They purported to be the proverbial watchdog of modern
journalism, committed to exposing the unvarnished truth and practicing complete

transparency under the rubric that hypocrisy is the only modern sin. (See Trial Trans. p.
1310:10-15; Trial Ex. 30.) For their part, Mr. Daulerios attorneys from LSKS are officers of the
Court who took oaths to perform their duties with honesty and integrity and, at the outset of this
case, swore under penalty of perjury to abide by the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct.
Having filed three of their own motions for sanctions against Mr. Bollea (all of which were
correctly denied), Mr. Daulerio and LSKS are aware of the standards governing sanctionable
conduct in Florida.2
The recent revelation of numerous instances in which Mr. Daulerio and LSKS concealed
and misrepresented material facts about issues central to this case, in sworn filings and
proceedings before this Court and before the jury, are deeply troubling. Their misconduct goes
well beyond mere oversight or failed memory concerning collateral issues. Rather, we are
dealing with a calculated effort to impede fair decision-making on core issues presented to the
On May 8, 2014, December 22, 2015 and May 18, 2016, the Defendants moved for sanctions against Mr. Bollea
based on alleged frauds upon the Court. All of these motions failed because, among other reasons, they were based
on incidents that, even if true, were at worst examples of oversight or failed memory about collateral and immaterial
issues.
{BC00103624:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 48 of 212
Main Document
trier of fact, as part of a calculated scheme to allow intentional tortfeasors found guilty of
maliciously posting illegally recorded, sexually explicit footage of Mr. Bollea on the Internet to
avoid accountability for their actions. Stated simply, we are dealing with an unconscionable
scheme to subvert the truth and the integrity of the Court.
We now know that Mr. Daulerio, LSKS and others forged a path of deception that can be
traced back to the trial of this case. Their goals were to try to spare Nick Denton from personal
liability, protect his Gawker empire from exposure for indemnity, reduce Mr. Daulerios and Mr.
Dentons responsibility for punitive damages, and prevent Mr. Bollea from collecting the $140.1
million Final Judgment he is owed.
Mr. Daulerio, the man who was convinced to fall on the sword to protect Nick Dentons
blog empire, finally seems to be realizing that he was used and abandoned by those he trusted.
As a result, the truth has slowly come to light. For example, in a recent interview, Mr. Daulerio
revealed that the lawyers that were representing Gawker in this case need[ed] me to
remember things in a certain way. Recent court filings have also confirmed that Mr. Daulerio
and LSKS knew, from the outset of this case, that Mr. Daulerio and Mr. Denton had valuable
indemnity rights that they were concealing, which had a direct impact on the core issue of
punitive damages awarded at trial. Recently, Mr. Daulerio filed bankruptcy Proofs of Claim
against each of the Gawker entities3 seeking to enforce the indemnity rights that he and LSKS
hid from the jury and this Court.
Even after this Court determined, on July 29, 2016, that it had been misled about
Mr. Daulerios and Mr. Dentons Gawker Media Group, Inc. (GMGI) stock (in connection
with their request to stay execution), Mr. Daulerio and his lawyers continued concealing assets
from Mr. Bollea. Mr. Daulerio signed and his lawyers filed financial affidavits that they knew
3
Copies of the Proofs of Claim are attached as Exhibits A (Gawker), B (GMGI) and C (Kinja).
{BC00103624:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 49 of 212
Main Document
were inaccurate. They continued to omit his indemnity rights, several laptop computers (some of
which LSKS physically possesses) and a copy of the illegally recorded, sexually explicit 30Minute Video of Mr. Bollea.
Incredibly, after Mr. Daulerio and LSKS openly mocked
Mr. Bollea with a flippant letter and press statements offering to return Mr. Daulerios rice
cooker and a golf club,4 Mr. Daulerio publicly threatened Mr. Bollea with the release of this
entire 30-minute sex tapethe very same tape which Mr. Daulerio repeatedly failed to disclose
in his affidavits and at his deposition.
The evidence is clear. It convincingly establishes that Mr. Daulerio and LSKS thumbed
their noses at the integrity of this proceeding by routinely misrepresenting and omitting material
facts that went to the heart of liability, punitive damages and execution upon the Final Judgment.
Accordingly, harsh sanctions should be imposed.
Overview of the Web of Deceit
In what is best described as a concerted effort to protect Nick Denton and his Gawker
empire, Mr. Daulerio was admittedly urged to remember things in a certain way, and he and
LSKS knowingly concealed and misrepresented facts and evidence that were material to this
case on numerous occasions:
LSKS advised Mr. Daulerio to remember things a certain way, which

seems to explain why Mr. Daulerio tried to take the fall at trial for Nick
Denton, by remembering their fire escape conversation about posting the
Bollea video5 inconsistently with Mr. Dentons sworn testimony.
Mr. Daulerios and Mr. Dentons indemnity rights against Gawker Media,
LLC (Gawker), Kinja, Kft. (Kinja) and Gawker Media Group, Inc.
(GMGI), were concealed in order to shield Kinja and GMGI from
liability and reduce Mr. Daulerios and Mr. Dentons exposure to punitive
damages.
See Daulerios 8/23/16 Claim of Exemption, Ex. A.

This was the conversation during which Mr. Denton testified at his deposition that he was informed of and
approved the publication of the sexually explicit footage of Mr. Bollea, which helped to establish Mr. Dentons
personal liability.
5
{BC00103624:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 50 of 212
Main Document
Mr. Daulerio and his LSKS counsel misled the Court about Mr. Daulerios
and Mr. Dentons assets and their value in order to obtain a temporary stay
of execution, which they then rejected and misled a bankruptcy court
about receiving.
On several different occasions, Mr. Daulerio and his LSKS counsel

knowingly executed and filed Court ordered financial disclosures which
they knew did not identify all of Mr. Daulerios assets.
The Already Adjudicated Misconduct
On July 29, 2016, this Court entered its Order Granting in Part Plaintiffs Motion to
Vacate; Denying Stay of Execution Pending Appeal; and Denying Defendants Motion for Stay
to Seek Appellate Review (the July 29 Order). In the July 29 Order, this Court found that Mr.
Daulerio misled the Court in connection with his pledge of GMGI stock as adequate security
to stay execution of the $115,100,000 judgment against him. (July 29 Order 8) This Court
further found that Mr. Daulerio and his counsel failed to advise the Court about material facts of
which they were aware that significantly impacted the value of the GMGI stock that was
pledged. (Id. 11)
The Court reserved jurisdiction to award attorneys fees and costs as a sanction, impose
additional sanctions and remedies, and to issue an order to show cause as to why Mr. Daulerio
and/or [his] counsel should not be held in contempt of court, all of which this Court takes under
advisement at this time. The Court specially set a sanctions hearing for October 31, 2016.
The Coaxing of Daulerios Memory
On or about September 28, 2016, an interview of Mr. Daulerio was posted on the
Longform Podcast,6 during which Mr. Daulerio threatened to release the full 30-Minute Video of
Mr. Bollea in violation of this Courts Permanent Injunction. As set forth below, Mr. Daulerio
See Ex. A. to Bolleas 10/6/16 Emergency Motion to Enforce Permanent Injunction.
{BC00103624:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 51 of 212
Main Document
repeatedly failed to disclose that he had this video, including at a deposition attended by LSKS
counsel.
During this interview, Mr. Daulerio expressed his frustration over his lawyers, whom he
identified as representing Gawker, and revealed that as some paranoia set in during this case
they [the lawyers] need[ed] me to remember things in a certain way.7
Looking back,
Mr. Daulerio thinks that Gawker at that time was also trying to basically protect their company
as best as they possibly can.8
Within the context of these statements, Mr. Daulerios testimony at trial regarding the
conversation that he had with Nick Denton on the fire escape outside Gawkers offices about
whether to publish the Bollea video stands out. On direct examination at trial, Mr. Daulerio
testified that he did not speak with Nick Denton before posting the Bollea video. (Trial Trans.
2738:25-2739:5) This testimony was elicited to support Mr. Dentons argument that he did not
participate in the posting of the video, and therefore was not personally liable for its publication.
(Verdict Form Question 3)
However, Mr. Denton previously testified at his deposition that he had spoken to
Mr. Daulerio on Gawkers fire escape outside the fourth floor of the Gawker office, and that
Mr. Daulerio was excited about posting the video.
(Trial Trans. 2769:7-2770:14)
When
confronted with this on cross-examination, Mr. Daulerio claimed that the conversation never
occurred [and that].. I think he [Denton] was confusing two different conversations. (Id. at
2770:15-2771:4) In closing argument, Mr. Bolleas counsel pointed out this transparent attempt
to circle the wagons around Denton. (Id. at 3700:16-21)
7
8
See 9/28/16 Trans. pp. 54:3-22; 9:4-10:5; 17:14-18:6.

Id. at p. 64:4-17.
{BC00103624:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 52 of 212
Main Document
In his September 28, 2016, interview, Mr. Daulerio confirmed this strategy. When asked
about whether he would do it all over again, Mr. Daulerio acknowledged that Nick Denton was
involved in the decision to post the Bollea video:
MR. DAULERIO: Well, and thats the thing is just like I had gone over that
scenario actually and prepared for that question specifically in terms of just like
going back in time and, you know, this is -- I hope this doesn't incriminate -- I
mean, what the f*ck is there to lose at this point, obviously, but, you know, Im
saying this -- like if I had that conversation with Nick, and Nick and I are sitting
there basically just saying this story will result in this culture war.
INTERVIEWER: Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO: If it smokes out those enemies, yes, you absolutely do it. I
think Nick fights this one hundred percent of the way. If it can potentially like
just end Gawker.com, no, nobody would absolutely do that. And, you know, that
wasnt -- that wasnt -- that wasn't at risk here, you know.
(See 9/28/16 Trans. pp. 72:7-73:2.) (Emphasis added) The clear implication of Mr. Daulerios
recent self-incrimination is that he, at the urging of his counsel, heeded their call to
remember the fire escape conversation differently to try to protect Nick Denton from
individual liability.
The seriousness of lying under oath, particularly by those professing to be purveyors of
the unvarnished truth, cannot be ignored. Perjury regarding a material matter is a third degree
felony in Florida. See 837.02, Fla. Stat. Witness tampering is also a crime. See 914.22, Fla.
Stat.9 Floridas Rules of Professional Conduct prohibit lawyers from offering false testimony,
and require the disclosure and correction of false evidence once it is presented to the Court
even after the conclusion of the proceeding. See Rule 4-3.3 (Candor Toward the Tribunal).
It bears mentioning that during the pendency of this case, Nick Denton approved a $500,000 Gawker investment
in Mr. Daulerios new gossip website, Ratter.com. (Trial Ex. 366)
{BC00103624:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 53 of 212
Main Document
Additional Misrepresentations About & Concealment of Assets

Mr. Daulerio and LSKS also made several material misrepresentations about his (and, as
to LSKS, Mr. Dentons) assets and net worth that materially impacted the punitive damages
phase of the trial, as well as this Courts initial decision to grant a temporary stay of execution.
Specifically, they knowingly concealed indemnity rights that Mr. Daulerio and Mr. Denton hold
against Gawker, Kinja and GMGI, and entered into a financial worth stipulation that they knew
to be false because it excluded these indemnity rights and other assets. These indemnity rights
and assets should have been disclosed and included within the Defendants net worth for
purposes of punitive damages, as well as for purposes of their request for a stay of execution
based on alternative security and in connection with discovery and execution upon the Final
Judgment. They were not.
Prior to trial, Mr. Bollea propounded financial worth discovery to Mr. Denton and
Mr. Daulerio, including interrogatories which asked them to identify all of their assets and,
specifically, their choses in action. In their verified responses, Mr. Denton and Mr. Daulerio did
not disclose their indemnity rights as an asset. (See 6/4/2015 Responses # 3) In fact, Mr. Denton
and Mr. Daulerio affirmatively represented that they did not have any such rights. (Id. #4).
LSKS served these responses.
The parties entered into a Stipulation at trial for purposes of punitive damages regarding
Mr. Dentons and Mr. Daulerios net worth. This Stipulation did not identify any indemnity
rights. Moreover, as to Mr. Daulerio, the Stipulation stated: A.J. Daulerio has no material
assets and has student loan debt in the amount of $27,000.
stipulation was read to the jury. (3891:10-3892:21)
{BC00103624:1}
(See Stipulation 6)
This
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 54 of 212
Main Document
Mr. Bolleas counsel (and the Court) took Mr. Daulerio and LSKS at their word, relied
upon the net worth Stipulation, and structured Mr. Bolleas argument to the jury accordingly. At
one point, LSKS even objected to a portion of the punitive damages closing that addressed
GMGIs $276 million stipulated value, because Gawker Media Group is not a party to this
case. (3899:16-3901:15) Mr. Daulerios counsel followed by arguing that the $115,000,000
verdict means financial ruin for Mr. Daulerio he has no material assets he will
never be able to pay $115,000,000. (3910:25-3911:5) Mr. Daulerios counsel also addressed
the financial condition and exposure of Mr. Denton, Gawker and GMGI:
As you just heard from Mr. Turkel, [Mr. Dentons] main asset is his ownership
interest in Gawker Medias Parent Company, GMGI. That company is not a party
to this case. It is not before you to be held liable.
Mr. Denton owns a percentage of that company. Besides that, besides that
ownership interest, he has total assetsbesides that, he has total assets, as the
judge told you of $3.6 million. That includes his home, his checking account, his
savings account, his retirement funds. Everything. $3.6 million. The verdict
already rendered will be financially devastating to Mr. Denton.
(3910:5-24) (emphasis added)
On rebuttal, Mr. Bolleas counsel acknowledged Mr. Daulerios position that GMGI was
not a party to the case. (3915: 14-24) Mr. Bolleas counsel also acknowledged, based on
Mr. Daulerios factual representations and the Stipulation, (all of which counsel believed to be
true), that Mr. Bollea, in fairness, could not tell the jury that a gentleman who has no assets and
$27,000 worth of student loans as his present worth would not be bankrupted or be financially
destroyed by this. (3917: 5-10)
At Defendants request and over Mr. Bolleas objection, the jury was instructed that it
could not award an amount that would financially destroy or bankrupt any of the defendants.
(3890:20-22) The jury followed that instruction, particularly as to Mr. Daulerio, by assessing
only $100,000 in punitive damages against him.
{BC00103624:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 55 of 212
Main Document
After trial, in support of the Defendants motion to stay execution, LSKS filed
Mr. Dentons and Mr. Daulerios sworn affidavits. Mr. Dentons Affidavit was signed June 9,
2016, and states as follows:
2.
As has been previously documented in this litigation, my principal asset is

my ownership interest in Gawker Media Group, Inc.
3.
I have a retirement account whose current value is $91,707.14 (See Ex. 1),
a brokerage account whose current value is $13.50 (See Ex. 2), a personal
banking account whose value is $5,078.64 (See Ex. 3), and a joint bank
account with my spouse whose value is $3,661.71 (See Ex. 4). I also
recently opened a second personal banking account which contains
$45,000 that I withdrew from my retirement account to pay for living
expenses. See Ex. 5
7.
As security for the appeal in the above-captioned matter, I am willing to

pledge the entirety of my interest in GMGI.
8.
I respectfully request that the Court deem that full ownership interest to be
adequate security to stay the judgment pending appeal. (emphasis added)
At the June 10, 2016 hearing on the motion for stay, LSKS reaffirmed Dentons
representations regarding his assets:
We understand that plaintiff has an interest in seeking security for his judgment.
We have taken time. We have employed other people to come up with a solution
to balance that interest, that interest in security and judgment with the interest in a
right to appeal that means something.
Weve undertaken a serious analysis, and what we are offering is a serious
condition. We have pledged what, between the three defendants, is the most
meaningful asset they have. And, again, its effectively what the plaintiff
could get if he were to execute.
(6/10/16 Trans. pp. 16:16-17:4)(emphasis added).
Mr. Dentons Affidavit is materially false in two respects. First, Mr. Denton did not
disclose that, on June 8, 2016, his now-bankrupt company loaned him $200,000 for personal
expenses; this $200,000 appears nowhere in any of his disclosed bank accounts.
{BC00103624:1}
10
Second,
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 56 of 212
Main Document
Mr. Denton did not disclose that GMGI owed him contractual indemnity rights under an
Indemnity Agreement, dated December 31, 2009.
With respect to these indemnity rights,
Heather Dietrick had already assured Mr. Denton, both before trial and after, that GMGI would
honor its indemnity obligations. (Denton 7/6/16 Depo. pp. 76-80; Dietrick 7/6/16 Depo. pp. 5659)10
Mr. Daulerios Affidavit in support of the motion for stay also was signed June 9, 2016,
and filed by LSKS, and states as follows:
2.
3.
My assets are:
a.
A 44.7% ownership interest in RGFree, Inc. (RGFree), a

privately-held start-up media company. RGFree is not currently
operational, and it has not earned any revenue. As a result, my
ownership interest in RGFree is not of material value.
b.
5,900 shares in Gawker Media Group, Inc.
c.
Checking and savings accounts holding approximately $13,000.

The money comes exclusively from gifts and some freelance
writing work. I do not currently have full-time employment.
I do not own a home, a car, or any other material assets.
Like Mr. Denton, Mr. Daulerio concealed his indemnification rights from Mr. Bollea,
from the jury and from the Court. In reality, Mr. Daulerio is also subject to a company practice
and policy of indemnification, by which the Debtor[s] defend and indemnify their writers and
editorial staff in connection with lawsuits related to the companys web content. (See Holden
Dec. 24)
We now know, based on Gawkers June 10, 2016 bankruptcy filings, subsequent
deposition testimony, and the verified bankruptcy Proofs of Claim recently filed by
Mr. Daulerio, that Nick Denton and Mr. Daulerio do indeed have indemnity rights which were
10
The deposition transcripts of Denton and Dietrick have already been filed confidentially under seal.
{BC00103624:1}
11
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 57 of 212
concealed from the Court, the jury and Mr. Bollea.
Main Document
In fact, Mr. Daulerio testified at his
August 17, 2016 deposition in aid of execution that he fully expects GMGI to pay the amount of
the judgment he owes. (8/17/16 Trans. p. 71:17-21) Consequently, when Mr. Daulerio and
LSKS represented to the jury that there was no way Mr. Daulerio could pay the $115 million
compensatory damage award, they were not being truthful.11
When LSKS argued that
Mr. Dentons only material assets were his GMGI stock, financial accounts, and his condo, they
were not being truthful.
And, when Mr. Daulerio and LSKS represented to the jury that
Mr. Daulerio has no material assets, they were likewise not being truthful. Under Florida law,
indemnity rights and choses in action are indisputably assets. See Puzzo v. Ray, 386 So.2d 49, 51
(Fla. 4th DCA 1980); General Guaranty Ins. Co. of Fla. v. DaCosta, 190 So.2d 211, 213-14
(Fla. 3d DCA 1966). Moreover, as set forth below, Mr. Daulerio had several other undisclosed,
material assets.
When the jury, this Court and Mr. Bollea took Mr. Daulerio and LSKS at their word
about Mr. Daulerios true financial condition, we were all deceived. In no uncertain terms,
LSKS represented to the jury that the compensatory damage award would financially destroy
Mr. Daulerio because he was worth so little, when in fact Mr. Daulerio and LSKS knew that he
held valuable indemnity rights which would ensure that the Gawker entities (worth at least $276
million) would pay any judgment entered against Mr. Daulerio and Mr. Denton. The Court
should have been told about these facts before the jury was given punitive damages instructions.
And the jury was entitled to know the whole truth about Mr. Daulerios and Mr. Dentons
financial condition when it was deciding the amount of punitive damages to assess.
11
Regardless of whether Mr. Daulerios indemnity rights flow from GMGI and/or Gawker,
GMGIs President and General Counsel had already assured Mr. Denton that GMGI would pay
all of the $115 million compensatory damages awarded by the jury.
{BC00103624:1}
12
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 58 of 212
Main Document
As for materiality, the fact that Mr. Daulerio and Mr. Denton had indemnity rights that
were concealed during financial worth discovery would have justified striking Mr. Dentons and
Mr. Daulerios pauper defense at trial. Improperly withholding net worth information justifies
disallowing a low net worth defense.
Belle Glade Chevrolet-Cadillac Buick Pontiac
Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Figgie, 54 So.3d 991, 996-97 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). More importantly, once
LSKS made the argument to the jury that a large punitive award would financially destroy
Mr. Daulerio and Mr. Denton, their indemnity rights became relevant. Humana Health Ins. Co.
of Florida, Inc. v. Chipps, 802 So.2d 492, 497-98 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), is directly on point:
Once [defendant] claimed that a large award would hurt or bankrupt the company financially,
the [indemnity] agreement became relevant for purposes of proving otherwise. If there is
evidence to rebut a defendants assertion that a large award would force it into financial straits,
then it should be admitted. Id.; see also Wheeler v. Murphy, 452 S.E.2d 416, 424 (W.Va. 1994)
(A defendants net worth is relevant to the issue of punitive damages, and in this case, where
defense counsel offered evidence of Mr. Murphys meager finances, the plaintiffs rebuttal
evidence disclosing the existence and policy limits of Mr. Murphys liability insurance is not
barred); Wallace v. Poulos, 861 F.Supp.2d 587, 602 (D. Md. 2012) ([I]nforming the jury of
the indemnification agreement makes jurors aware that Defendants ability to pay is essentially a
moot point [and] ensures that jurors have an accurate understanding of the likely deterrence
effect of their judgment.)
Here, Mr. Bollea was denied his right to discover and present this highly relevant
evidence to the jury because Mr. Daulerio and LSKS concealed valuable indemnity rights.
While the validity and enforceability of these indemnity rights may be subject to debate, that fact
is of no consequence at this point because the preemptive deception of the jury and this Court at
{BC00103624:1}
13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 59 of 212
Main Document
trial cannot be undone any debate about that should have been raised after full disclosure and
before the jury rendered its punitive damages award, not after the trial and a final judgment has
been entered.
Moreover, as set forth above, Gawker and GMGIs General Counsel and
President, Heather Dietrick, already assured Mr. Denton, before and after the trial, that his
indemnity rights for the entire amount of the Bollea judgment would be honored. (See Dietrick
7/6/15 Depo. at pp. 55-70.) Unless GMGI and Gawker intend to take an inconsistent position
against Mr. Daulerio, and leave him exposed (notwithstanding Gawkers bankruptcy case
argument and public assertion that doing so would have a chilling effect on Gawkers other
writers), Mr. Daulerio must have been extended the same assurances that Mr. Denton received.
Regardless, the entire $276 million stipulated value of GMGI should have been available to the
jury to support a punitive damage award against Mr. Denton and Mr. Daulerio. It was not.
Making matters worse, Mr. Daulerio only recently revealed that he also has indemnity
rights against Kinja. For some reason, Mr. Daulerio and LSKS did not disclose these indemnity
rights against Kinja in connection with the Proceedings Supplementary initiated by Mr. Bollea
including before, at and after the August 11, 2016 hearing held to address Mr. Daulerios
indemnity rights. Nevertheless, on September 29, 2016, Mr. Daulerio filed a Proof of Claim
against Kinja in its pending bankruptcy proceeding based on his indemnity rights against that
entity. (See Exhibit C)
Mr. Daulerios and LSKSs concealment of this relevant and material evidence directly
impacted the trial. The fact that Mr. Daulerio and Mr. Denton, who were represented by the
same counsel, both concealed their indemnity rights demonstrates a calculated scheme to reduce
their exposure to punitive damages, while simultaneously shielding Gawker, GMGI and Kinja
from liability.
{BC00103624:1}
14
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 60 of 212
Main Document
Mr. Daulerios and LSKSs concealment of Mr. Daulerios and Mr. Dentons true net
worth also impacted the post-trial proceedings. At the hearing held in this Court at 9:00 a.m. on
June 10, 2016, Mr. Daulerios counsel acknowledged that they and their clients understood that
the plaintiff wants security for the judgment. (6/10/16 Trans. p. 6:19-21)12 They also urged this
Court to accept the pledge of Mr. Daulerios GMGI stock and options as adequate security in
exchange for a stay of execution pending appeal. They represented to the Court that, were not
seeking some sort of free ride. Were not seeking an unsecured stay. (6/10/16 Trans. p. 7:1417) Mr. Denton, as we [LSKS] said in [the Motion for Stay] and now I can say the same for
Mr. Daulerio, are literally willing to put their money where their mouth is. Both of them will
pledge their shares of Gawker Media Group, Inc., as security for the judgment that has been
entered
(6/10/16 Trans. pp. 7:20-8:4).
Then, LSKS reaffirmed Mr. Daulerios and
Mr. Dentons false representations regarding their assets:

Weve done a serious analysis, and what we are offering is a serious condition.
We have pledged what, between the three defendants, is the most meaningful
asset they have. And, again, its effectively what the plaintiff could get if he
were to execute.
(6/10/16 Trans. pp. 16:16-17:4) (emphasis added). This assertion was also untrue.
Within hours of LSKS making this statement to this Court, Gawker obtained a temporary
restraining order from the bankruptcy court that protected Mr. Denton and Mr. Daulerio; that
TRO was based, in part, on the sworn assertion that Mr. Daulerio and Mr. Denton have
indemnity rights a fact that directly contradicts what LSKS had just represented to this Court.
Moreover, those indemnity rights are indeed assets which are reachable through proceedings
supplementary to help satisfy the judgment. Puzzo, 386 So.2d 49, 51; DaCosta, 190 So.2d 211,
12
The June 10, 2016 Hearing Transcript has previously been filed.
{BC00103624:1}
15
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 61 of 212
Main Document
213-14; see also In re. Celotex Corp., 204 B.R. 586, 613-14 (M.D. Fla. 1996) (indemnification
rights are property of a debtors estate, which can be assigned or transferred).
Having undertaken a serious analysis, Mr. Daulerio and LSKS certainly knew that
indemnity rights against Gawker, GMGI and Kinja were available to help satisfy Mr. Bolleas
judgment. In fact, according to Mr. Daulerios August 9, 2016 Objection to Notice of Hearing
(see Footnote 2 herein), LSKS even told Daulerio, at the outset of this case, that, because of a
conflict, they could not advise Mr. Daulerio about his indemnity rights. Importantly, these
indemnity rights flowed from a non-party, GMGI, whose stipulated value was $276 million; as
well as non-party, Kinja, to which Defendants have attributed 2/3 of the value of GMGI.
Mr. Daulerios recent filings and Longform Podcast interview further crystalized why the
indemnity rights against Gawker, GMGI and Kinja were concealed. In Mr. Daulerios August 9,
2016, Objection to Notice of Hearing, he objected to proceeding with an August 11, 2016
hearing on Mr. Bolleas already pending request for sanctions (referred to as one of many
matters the Levine Sullivan firm has been handling). Tellingly, Mr. Daulerios objection states:
Undersigned counsel explained to Mr. Daulerio at the outset of the case that,
under the Rules of Professional Responsibility, they could not advise him about
indemnification rights against Gawker since they are also representing the
company. Because Plaintiff13 has objected in the bankruptcy proceeding to
Gawkers continuing to pay for his defense in this action, making that matter a
live issue for the first time, Mr. Daulerio is attempting to engage separate counsel
to address indemnification issues.
Mr. Daulerios indemnification rights did not become a live issue for the first time in
August 2016. His indemnity rights were a core issue before, during and after trial. The
concealment of those rights, given the above admissions about when Mr. Daulerio and LSKS
knew those rights existed and the associated conflict of interest involved with them, raises grave
13
Mr. Bollea did not object. The Creditors Committee did.
{BC00103624:1}
16
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 62 of 212
Main Document
concern over why the indemnity rights were not disclosed long before Gawkers June 10, 2016
bankruptcy filing.
According to Mr. Daulerios Longform Podcast interview, he operated under the
assumption that, because he was indemnified, Mr. Bollea couldnt pursue him personally.
(9/28/16 Trans. p. 17:14-24) However, Mr. Daulerio wasnt offered advice because there were
so many conflicts at that point. (Id. at 18:3-6) After apparently being blindsided by the reality
of his personal liability at the last minute, Mr. Daulerio concluded that everything that was told
to me from the beginning about that this would actually impact me personally was bullsh*t.
(Id. at 20:10-18)
Mr. Daulerio has now retained independent counsel to advise him about his indemnity
rights. (See Marburger 10/7/16 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission.) However, according to
Mr. Daulerio, he still has no intention of conceding his wrongdoing:
MR. DAULERIO: Because that's the part about this that's really hard is definitely
being trapped, and also that feeling of being trapped and kind of just not only
being trapped but still I have a hearing on October 31st where I'm basically going
to be sitting in front of that judge who is going to kind of decide whether or not I
was lying on my financial affidavit about these indemnity rights which apparently
are worth money, that I was lying about them to cover up this fact, and then she
can fine me some more. Like that's preposterous, but that's the way the legal
system works right now, and that's the position that I'm in. And, you know, the
choices ultimately just like they're giving me are kind of just like take back
everything you loved about Nick, Gawker, and your job, and we'll give you your
thousand dollars back, or your ability to make money, or you can walk away from
this, but you just can't talk about it ever again. I don't see there's any question for
me. I mean, I definitely thought long and hard about it, and I've definitely talked
to a lot of people about it. It's just not in me.
(9/28/16 Trans. p. 78:7-79:10)
Incredibly, the pattern of deception continued even after Mr. Bollea had already moved
for relief and sanctions (based on some of Mr. Daulerios and LSKSs misconduct), and after this
Court had already issued its July 29 Order and set the October 31st sanctions hearing.
{BC00103624:1}
17
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 63 of 212
Main Document
Mr. Daulerio and LSKS persisted in concealing Mr. Daulerios assets. For example, after the
Court issued its August 1, 2016 Notice to Appear and Show Cause on Proceedings
Supplementary, Mr. Daulerio signed, and his LSKS counsel filed, an affidavit and an
accompanying Response, in which they still failed to identify Mr. Daulerios indemnity rights
against Kinja, and also failed to disclose Mr. Daulerios ownership of three (3) laptop computers
and his possession of the 30-Minute Video of Mr. Bollea.14
After the Court issued its August 16, 2016 Order on Proceedings Supplementary,
Mr. Daulerio appeared on August 17, 2016 for the taking of his deposition in aid of execution, at
which he was represented by LSKS counsel. At that deposition, Mr. Daulerio revealed that he
owned two (2) laptop computers, one of which LSKS stated on the record was being preserved in
LSKSs physical possession. (Daulerio 8/17/16 Depo. pp. 7:5-8; 7:21-24) After Mr. Daulerio
was asked about all of the other items of personal property he possessed, the undersigned sought
to confirm that Mr. Daulerio had finally disclosed all of his assets:
Q.
Do you have any other property, or property interest, that we havent

discussed so far?
A.
No.
Q.
And other than what weve talked about today, are you aware of any other
personal property, intellectual property, rights under contracts, anything
like that, that we havent talked about?
A.
No.
(Daulerio 8/17/16 Depo. pp. 59:12-14; 73:16-20)

In fact, Mr. Daulerio had another (third) laptop computer that was also in LSKSs
physical possession,15 as well as a copy of the full 30-minute illegally recorded, sexually explicit
14
Mr. Daulerio also failed to disclose numerous other assets, including property he sold and gave to another person
before moving to Florida.
15
See Daulerio 8/31/16 Response to Plaintiffs Objection to Claim of Exemption, p. 2, FN1.
{BC00103624:1}
18
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 64 of 212
Main Document
video of Mr. Bollea.16 Mr. Daulerios and his LSKS counsels concealment of these assets is not
immaterial. The significant value of the 30-Minute Video is evidenced by the damages awarded
at trial. And Mr. Daulerios laptops (which he values at $2,000 each) were in and of themselves
sufficient to exceed the amount of the personal property exemptions to execution that
Mr. Daulerio claimed under Florida and New York law. (See Daulerios 8/23/16 Claim of
Exemption.)
While Mr. Daulerio and LSKS were concealing Mr. Daulerios assets, Mr. Daulerio was
also squandering substantial amounts of money traveling and pampering himself on a lavish fulltime vacation in Florida. (See Bolleas 8/26/16 Objection to Daulerios Claim of Exemption.)
He dissipated tens of thousands of dollars, which included several trips from Florida to New
York and Los Angeles, regular golf outings and massages. (Id. at p. 4) He also sold personal
property worth at least $1,000 for $300 to a bar in New York, and gave furniture, artwork and
sports memorabilia worth at least a few thousand dollars to a friend. (Id.)
In all, Mr. Daulerio blew through $50,000 given to him by his family and a friend, and
failed to disclose at least $10,000 of personal property. These assets could have satisfied a
substantial portion of the $100,000 punitive damage award against him.
Incredibly,
Mr. Daulerio and LSKS responded by claiming that his undisclosed assets are not material.
(See Daulerios 8/31/16 Response p. 2.)
The fact that Mr. Daulerio and LSKS have publicly taunted Mr. Bollea with personal
property they knowingly and repeatedly failed to disclose, while also knowing that they had
concealed indemnity rights throughout this case from the jury, this Court and Mr. Bollea, and
that Mr. Daulerios attempt to remember things in a certain way to protect Nick Denton had
failed at trial, clearly establishes that the misconduct at issue is intentional, inexcusable and
16
See Bollea 10/6/16 Emergency Motion to Enforce Permanent Injunction.
{BC00103624:1}
19
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 65 of 212
Main Document
intolerable. This misconduct struck a severe blow to the integrity of this Honorable Court, and
must be dealt with accordingly.
Argument
As set forth above, the civil litigation process depends on truthful disclosure of facts.
Morgan, 816 So.2d at 254. Revealing only some of the facts does not constitute [the] truthful
disclosure that is required to maintain the integrity of the civil litigation process. Ramey,
993 So.2d at 1019 (citing Morgan, 816 So.2d at 254; and quoting Cox, 706 So.2d at 47)
(emphasis added). Preserving the integrity of the judicial process and protecting the proper
administration of justice are of paramount importance. That is why attorneys are primarily
officers of the Court, bound to serve the ends of justice with openness, candor and fairness to
alleven when it appears in conflict with a clients interests. Ramey v. Thomas, 382 So.2d 78,
81 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). In fact, the duty of candor toward the tribunal is viewed as one of the
most sacrosanct ethical and legal obligations in the Rules of Professional Conduct and under
Florida law. See, Rules 4-3.3 and 4-8.4, Fla. R. Prof. Cond.; Phillip Morris USA, Inc. v. Green,
175 So.2d 312, 315 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).
Every court has the prerogative and duty to see that its processes are not abused.
Marine Transport Lines, Inc. v. Green, 114 So.2d 710, 711 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959). In furtherance
of this duty, all courts have the inherent authority to impose sanctions for bad faith litigation.
Patsy v. Patsy, 666 So.2d 1045, 1046-47 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Sheldon Greene & Assoc., Inc. v.
Williams Island Assoc., Ltd., 592 So.2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Emerson Realty Group, Inc. v.
Schanze, 572 So.2d 942, 945 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).
Section 45.045, Florida Statutes, also gives this Court substantial discretion to impose
sanctions. Under Section 45.045(4), [i]f the trial or appellate court determines that an appellant
{BC00103624:1}
20
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 66 of 212
Main Document
has dissipated or diverted assets outside the course of its ordinary business or is in the process of
doing so, the court may enter orders necessary to protect the appellee and impose other
remedies and sanctions as the Court deems appropriate. See also, Fla. R. App. P. 9.310(b)(3).
Mr. Daulerio and LSKS knowingly and intentionally misled this Court, the jury and
Mr. Bollea about the core issues in this case by remembering things in a certain way and
concealing Mr. Daulerios and Mr. Dentons indemnity rights so they could cry poverty in order
to reduce their punitive damages exposure and protect the Gawker entities. Then, they continued
to intentionally mislead this Court and Mr. Bollea by purposely concealing material facts
associated with Mr. Daulerios and Mr. Dentons assets and the value and legitimacy of the
alternative security they pledged in exchange for a request, which this Court orally granted, to
stay execution of the Final Judgment. The pledge of GMGI stock was illusory, and at the time
this Court was asked to grant the extraordinary remedy of staying execution without having to
post a good and sufficient bond required under Florida law, Mr. Daulerio and LSKS were also
concealing other material assets. Then, after Mr. Bollea and this Court unwittingly accepted
their false representations and illusory stock pledge, Mr. Daulerio and LSKS were implicitly, if
not directly, participants in the scheme to misrepresent this Courts June 10, 2016 ruling in order
to obtain a stay on more preferable conditions in Gawkers bankruptcy proceedings. When that
tactic failed, Mr. Daulerio and LSKS continued to misrepresent Mr. Daulerios financial
condition and assets to try to prevent Mr. Bollea from collecting what he is owed. All of these
misrepresentations involve matters at the core of this case, not collateral issues. Ramey, 993
So.2d at 1020. Such misrepresentations by their very nature unfairly hampered the presentation
of Mr. Bolleas claims. Id. (citing Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir.
1989).
{BC00103624:1}
21
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 67 of 212
Main Document
Mr. Daulerios and his counsels misconduct interfered with this Courts and the jurys
ability to impartially adjudicate this case, and improperly influenced the trier of fact regarding
the central issues of liability, punitive damages, a stay of execution and collection. Mr. Daulerio
and LSKS are guilty of making material misrepresentations that directly impacted core issues at
trial and during post-trial proceedings, and should be sanctioned accordingly.
Tampering with the administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown here
involves far more than an injury to a single litigant. It is a wrong against the institutions set up to
safeguard the public, institutions in which fraud cannot complacently be tolerated consistently
with the good order of society. Ramey, 933 So.2d at 1020-21 (citing, Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v.
Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 246 (1944), receded from on other grounds by Standard Oil
Co. of Cal. v. U.S., 429 U.S. 17 (1976)).
In light of the severity and repetition of the misconduct at issue, Mr. Daulerio and LSKS
also should be required to show cause why they should not be held in contempt. Contempt is an
act that hinders or obstructs a court in the administration of justice. Ex parte Crews, 173 So. 275
(1937). Florida cases have recognized the use of direct and indirect criminal contempt to punish
the making of false statements. Haeussler v. State, 100 So.3d 732, 734 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).
Direct criminal contempt is an act committed in the presence of the court so as to hinder judicial
proceedings, and may result in serious consequences, including immediate imprisonment.
Emanuel v. State, 601 So.2d 1273, 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Intentionally underrepresenting
ones financial condition in sworn documents filed with a trial court is punishable by at least
indirect criminal contempt. Haeussler, 100 So.3d at 734.
In situations such as this one, courts have the discretion to cite a guilty person for
contempt, direct that the record be sent to the State Attorneys office for investigation or, in
{BC00103624:1}
22
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 68 of 212
Main Document
proper cases, strike pleadings or testimony shown to be a sham. Parham v. Kohler, 134 So.2d
274, 276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961). Remedies for perjury, slander and the like committed during
judicial proceedings are left to the discipline of the courts, the bar association, and the state.
Wright v. Yurko, 446 So.2d 1162, 1164 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Sheldon Greene & Assoc., Inc.,
592 So.2d 307; Emerson Realty, 572 So.2d at 945; Rule 2.515, Fla. R. Jud. Admin.; Emanuel,
601 So.2d at 1275; Parham, 134 So.2d at 276; Wright, 446 So.2d at 1164.
[B]asic, fundamental dishonesty is a serious flaw, which cannot be tolerated because
dishonesty and a lack of candor cannot be tolerated by a profession that relies on the
truthfulness of its members. The Florida Bar v. Head, 27 So.3d 1, 8 (Fla. 2010). Dishonest
conduct demonstrates the utmost disrespect for the court and is destructive to the legal system as
a whole. Id. at 8-9. When such conduct occurs, courts have the authority to assess sanctions
against parties as well as their counsel. Patsy, 666 So.2d at 1047; Levine v. Keaster, 862 So.2d
876, 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
The case of The Florida Bar v. Dupee, 160 So.3d 838 (Fla. 2015), illustrates the sorts of
repercussions that can flow from conduct like the conduct at issue here. In Dupee, a lawyer
knowingly filed an inaccurate financial affidavit, failed to disclose the existence of an asset (a
cashiers check) belonging to her client, and allowed her client to provide false evasive
testimony at a deposition. The attorney was suspended one year for violating Rule 3-4.3
(unlawful and dishonest acts), Rule 4-3.3 (making or failing to correct a false statement of
material fact made to a tribunal), Rule 4-3.4 (a lawyer must not fabricate evidence), Rule 4-4.1
(making a false statement or failing to disclose a material fact) and Rule 4-8.4 (a lawyer shall not
violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or do so through the acts of another and shall not
engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.). Id. at 847. When
{BC00103624:1}
23
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 69 of 212
Main Document
the lawyers from LSKS sought permission to appear pro hac vice in this case, they agreed to be
bound by these very same rules, and to subject themselves to the jurisdiction of this state for
enforcement. The violation of that agreement has consequences.
CONCLUSION
The misconduct engaged in by Mr. Daulerio and LSKS cannot be ignored nor justified.
The integrity of this Court and our justice system must be protected. To achieve that, this Court
is empowered to consider the full array of available sanctions.
WHEREFORE, Mr. Bollea respectfully requests that this Court adjudicate Mr. Daulerio
and LSKS guilty of engaging in a pattern of deception involving core issues and material facts
that misled the jury and this Court,17 sanction Mr. Daulerio and LSKS, consider entering an order
to show cause why Mr. Daulerio and/or his counsel should not be held in contempt, consider
referral for other remedial measures; and grant any other relief this Court deems just and
appropriate.
DATED: October 13, 2016.
/s/ Kenneth G. Turkel

Kenneth G. Turkel, Esq.
Florida Bar No. 867233
Email: kturkel@bajocuva.com
Shane B. Vogt
Email: svogt@bajocuva.com
BAJO CUVA COHEN & TURKEL, P.A.
100 North Tampa Street, Suite 1900
Tampa, Florida 33602
Tel: (813) 443-2199
Fax: (813) 443-2193
- and -
17
Mr. Bollea seeks specific findings regarding Mr. Daulerios misconduct because such misconduct may impact his
rights in his appeals of the Final Judgment and this Courts Order on Proceedings Supplementary. See Andrews v.
Palmas De Majorca Condo., 898 So.2d 1066, 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (Fraud committed against trial court may
warrant dismissal of an appeal, given that fraud on court, any court, infects the entire proceeding.)
{BC00103624:1}
24
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 70 of 212
Main Document
Charles J. Harder, Esq.

PHV No. 102333
HARDER MIRELL & ABRAMS LLP
132 S. Rodeo Drive, Fourth Floor
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Tel: (424) 203-1600
Fax: (424) 203-1601
Email: charder@hmafirm.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
{BC00103624:1}
25
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 71 of 212
Main Document
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by
E-Mail via the e-portal system this 13th day of October, 2016 to the following:
Gregg D. Thomas, Esquire
Rachel E. Fugate, Esquire
Thomas & LoCicero PL
601 S. Boulevard
gthomas@tlolawfirm.com
rfugate@tlolawfirm.com
kbrown@tlolawfirm.com
abeene@tlolawfirm.com
Counsel for Gawker Defendants
Seth D. Berlin, Esquire

Paul J. Safier, Esquire
Alia L. Smith, Esquire
Michael D. Sullivan, Esquire
Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP
1899 L. Street, NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20036
sberlin@lskslaw.com
psafier@lskslaw.com
asmith@lskslaw.com
msullivan@lskslaw.com
Pro Hac Vice Counsel for
Gawker Defendants
Steven L. Brannock, Esquire

Celene H. Humphries, Esquire
Brannock & Humphries
1111 West Cass Street, Suite 200
Tampa, FL 33606
sbrannock@bhappeals.com
chumphries@bhappeals.com
eservice@bhappeals.com
Co-Counsel for Gawker Defendants
Michael Berry, Esquire

Levine Sullivan Koch & Schultz, LLP
1760 Market Street, Suite 1001
Philadelphia, PA 19103
mberry@lskslaw.com
Pro Hac Vice Counsel for
Gawker Defendants
David R. Houston, Esquire

Law Office of David R. Houston
432 Court Street
Reno, NV 89501
dhouston@houstonatlaw.com
krosser@houstonatlaw.com
Stuart C. Markman, Esquire

Kristin A. Norse, Esquire
Kynes, Markman & Felman, P.A.
Post Office Box 3396
smarkman@kmf-law.com
knorse@kmf-law.com
plawhead@kmf-law.com
Appellate Co-Counsel for Plaintiff
Andrew B. Greenlee, Esquire

Greenlee, P.A.
401 E. 1st Street, Unit 261
Sanford, FL 32772
Tel: (407) 808-6411
andrew@andrewgreenleelaw.com
{BC00103624:1}
26
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 72 of 212
David Marburger, Esquire

Marburger Law LLC
14650 Detroit Avenue, Suite 450
Cleveland, OH 44107
Tel: (216) 930-0500
david@marburger-law.com
Counsel for A. J. Daulerio
/s/ Kenneth G. Turkel
Attorney
{BC00103624:1}
27
Main Document
Doc10/13/2016
493 Filed05:09:46
11/28/16 PM
47600095 E-Filed
Pg 73 of 212
EXHIBIT A
PrimeClerk, E-POC Filed on 09/29/2016
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 74 of 212
United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York
Main Document
Please select applicable Debtor (select only one Debtor per claim form):
Gawker Media, LLC (Case No. 16-11700)
Kinja, Kft. (Case No. 16-11718)
Gawker Media Group, Inc. (Case No. 16-11719)
Official Form 410
Proof of Claim
4/16
Read the instructions before filling out this form. This form is for making a claim for payment in a bankruptcy case. Do not use this form to
make a request for payment of an administrative expense. Make such a request according to 11 U.S.C. 503.
Filers must leave out or redact information that is entitled to privacy on this form or on any attached documents. Attach redacted copies of any
documents that support the claim, such as promissory notes, purchase orders, invoices, itemized statements of running accounts, contracts, judgments,
mortgages, and security agreements. Do not send original documents; they may be destroyed after scanning. If the documents are not available,
explain in an attachment.
A person who files a fraudulent claim could be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. 152, 157, and 3571.
Fill in all the information about the claim as of the date the case was filed. That date is on the notice of bankruptcy (Form 309) that you received.
Part 1:
Identify the Claim
1. Who is the current

creditor?
Albert James Daulerio (born 1974)

Name of the current creditor (the person or entity to be paid for this claim)
Other names the creditor used with the debtor
A.J. Daulerio
2. Has this claim been

acquired from
someone else?
3. Where should notices

and payments to the
creditor be sent?
Where should notices to the creditor be sent?
Federal Rule of
Bankruptcy Procedure
(FRBP) 2002(g)
4. Does this claim amend

one already filed?
No
Yes. From whom?
Where should payments to the creditor be sent? (if
different)
Marburger Law LLC attn: David Marburger

Cleveland, OH 44107
Contact phone
216 930 0500
Contact phone
Contact email
Contact email
No
Yes. Claim number on court claims registry (if known)
Filed on
MM
5. Do you know if anyone

else has filed a proof
of claim for this claim?
Form 295
410
Claim Official
Number:
/ DD
/ YYYY
No
Yes. Who made the earlier filing?
Proof of Claim
page 1
16-11700-smb
Part 2:
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 75 of 212
Main Document
Give Information About the Claim as of the Date the Case Was Filed
6. Do you have any number

you use to identify the
debtor?
7. How much is the claim?
No
Yes. Last 4 digits of the debtors account or any number you use to identify the debtor:
$ 6,000,000.00
. Does this amount include interest or other charges?
8. What is the basis of the

claim?
No
Yes. Attach statement itemizing interest, fees, expenses, or other
charges required by Bankruptcy Rule 3001(c)(2)(A).
Examples: Goods sold, money loaned, lease, services performed, personal injury or wrongful death, or credit card.
Attach redacted copies of any documents supporting the claim required by Bankruptcy Rule 3001(c).
Limit disclosing information that is entitled to privacy, such as health care information.
Duty to defend and indemnify - see Supplement & Exhibits

9. Is all or part of the claim
secured?
No
Yes. The claim is secured by a lien on property.

Nature of property:
Real estate. If the claim is secured by the debtors principal residence, file a Mortgage Proof of Claim
Attachment (Official Form 410-A) with this Proof of Claim.
Motor vehicle
Other. Describe:
Basis for perfection:

Attach redacted copies of documents, if any, that show evidence of perfection of a security interest (for
example, a mortgage, lien, certificate of title, financing statement, or other document that shows the lien has
been filed or recorded.)
Value of property:
Amount of the claim that is secured:
Amount of the claim that is unsecured: $
(The sum of the secured and unsecured

amounts should match the amount in line 7.)
Amount necessary to cure any default as of the date of the petition:
Annual Interest Rate (when case was filed)
10. Is this claim based on a

lease?
11. Is this claim subject to a

right of setoff?
Official Form 410
Fixed
Variable
No
Yes. Amount necessary to cure any default as of the date of the petition.
No
Yes. Identify the property:
Proof of Claim
page 2
16-11700-smb

entitled to priority under
11 U.S.C. 507(a)?
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 76 of 212
Main Document
No
Yes. Check one:
A claim may be partly

priority and partly
nonpriority. For example,
in some categories, the
law limits the amount
entitled to priority.
Amount entitled to priority:
Domestic support obligations (including alimony and child support) under

11 U.S.C. 507(a)(1)(A) or (a)(1)(B).
Up to $2,850* of deposits toward purchase, lease, or rental of property or services for

personal, family, or household use. 11 U.S.C. 507(a)(7).
Wages, salaries, or commissions (up to $12,850*) earned within 180 days before the
bankruptcy petition is filed or the debtors business ends, whichever is earlier.
11 U.S.C. 507(a)(4).
Taxes or penalties owed to governmental units. 11 U.S.C. 507(a)(8).
Contributions to an employee benefit plan. 11 U.S.C. 507(a)(5).
Other. Specify subsection of 11 U.S.C. 507(a)(
) that applies.
* Amounts are subject to adjustment on 4/01/19 and every 3 years after that for cases begun on or after the date of adjustment.
13. Is all or part of the
claim entitled to
administrative priority
pursuant to
11 U.S.C. 503(b)(9)?
Part 3:
No
Yes. Indicate the amount of your claim arising from the value of any goods received
$ ____________________
by the Debtor within 20 days before the date of commencement of the above case, in
which the goods have been sold to the Debtor in the ordinary course of such
Debtors business. Attach documentation supporting such claim.
Sign Below
The person completing

this proof of claim must
sign and date it.
FRBP 9011(b).
If you file this claim
electronically, FRBP
5005(a)(2) authorizes courts
to establish local rules
specifying what a signature
is.
A person who files a
fraudulent claim could be
fined up to $500,000,
imprisoned for up to 5
years, or both.
18 U.S.C. 152, 157, and
3571.
Check the appropriate box:
I am the creditor.
I am the creditors attorney or authorized agent.
I am the trustee, or the debtor, or their authorized agent. Bankruptcy Rule 3004.
I am a guarantor, surety, endorser, or other codebtor. Bankruptcy Rule 3005.
I understand that an authorized signature on this Proof of Claim serves as an acknowledgment that when calculating the
amount of the claim, the creditor gave the debtor credit for any payments received toward the debt.
I have examined the information in this Proof of Claim and have a reasonable belief that the information is true
and correct.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature:
Albert James Daulerio

Albert James Daulerio (Sep 29, 2016)
Email: david@marburger-law.com
Signature
Print the name of the person who is completing and signing this claim:
Name

First name
Title
n/a
Company
n/a
Middle name
Last name
Identify the corporate servicer as the company if the authorized agent is a servicer.
Address
c/o Marburger Law LLC, 14650 Detroit Avenue, Suite 450

Number
Contact phone
Official Form 410
Street
Cleveland
OH
City
State
216 930 0500
Email david@marburger-law.com
Proof of Claim
44107
ZIP Code
page 3
Doc10/13/2016
493 Filed05:09:46
11/28/16 PM
47600095 E-Filed
Pg 77 of 212
EXHIBIT B
Prime Clerk
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 78 of 212
Main Document
Creditor Data Details for Claim # 294

Creditor
Daulerio, Albert James
Date Filed
09/29/2016
Claim Number
294
Debtor Name
Gawker Media Group, Inc.
Proof of Claim
Suppressed
Schedule Number
Schedule
Amount
C*
U*
General Unsecured
D*
Asserted
ClaimAmount
C*
U*
F*
Current
ClaimValue
$6,000,000.00
$6,000,000.00
Total
$0.00
$6,000,000.00
*C=Contingent, U=Unliquidated, D=Disputed, F=Foreign
$6,000,000.00
Claim Status
Asserted
Priority
Secured
503(b)(9) Admin
Priority
Admin Priority
Prime Clerk maintains this website for the public's convenience and for general informational purposes only. Anyone using this website is cautioned NOT to
rely on any information contained on this Website, and any user of this website should not take or refrain from taking any action based upon anything
included or not included on this website. We are not a law firm or a substitute for an attorney or law firm. Users of this website may want to seek legal
counsel on the particular facts and circumstances at issue. All search results provided through this website are qualified in their entirety by the official
register of claims and the Schedules of Assets and Liabilities ("Schedules") and Statements of Financial Affairs (Statements) filed in the bankruptcy case/s
of the Debtor/s.
Nothing contained on this Site or in the Debtors Schedules and Statements shall constitute an admission or a waiver of any of the Debtors rights to assert
claims or defenses. Any failure by a Debtor to designate a claim listed on the Schedules as "disputed", "contingent", or "unliquidated" does not constitute an
admission that such amounts are not "disputed", "contingent", or "unliquidated." For the avoidance of doubt, listing a claim on Schedule D as secured, on
Schedule E as priority, on Schedule F as non-priority, or listing a contract or lease on Schedule G as executory or unexpired, does not constitute an
admission by the Debtors of the legal rights of the claimant, or a waiver of the Debtors right to recharacterize or reclassify such claim or contract. Each
Debtor reserves the right to amend their Schedules and Statements as necessary or appropriate. Debtors further reserve the right to dispute, on any
grounds, or to assert offsets or defenses to, any claim reflected on their Schedules or filed against a Debtor, including objecting to the amount, liability,
classification or priority of such claim, or to otherwise subsequently designate any claim as "disputed, contingent or unliquidated.
Print page
https://cases.primeclerk.com/gawker/Home-ClaimDetails?id=425120[10/13/2016 3:23:28 PM]
Doc10/13/2016
493 Filed05:09:46
11/28/16 PM
47600095 E-Filed
Pg 79 of 212
EXHIBIT C
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 80 of 212
United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York
Main Document
Official Form 410
Proof of Claim
4/16
Read the instructions before filling out this form. This form is for making a claim for payment in a bankruptcy case. Do not use this form to
Filers must leave out or redact information that is entitled to privacy on this form or on any attached documents. Attach redacted copies of any
mortgages, and security agreements. Do not send original documents; they may be destroyed after scanning. If the documents are not available,
A person who files a fraudulent claim could be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. 152, 157, and 3571.
Fill in all the information about the claim as of the date the case was filed. That date is on the notice of bankruptcy (Form 309) that you received.
Part 1:
Identify the Claim

creditor?

Name of the current creditor (the person or entity to be paid for this claim)
Other names the creditor used with the debtor
A.J. Daulerio

acquired from
someone else?
3. Where should notices

and payments to the
creditor be sent?
Where should notices to the creditor be sent?
Federal Rule of
(FRBP) 2002(g)

one already filed?
No
Yes. From whom?
Where should payments to the creditor be sent? (if
different)
Marburger Law LLC, attn: David Marburger

Cleveland, OH 44107
Contact phone
216 930 0500
Contact phone
Contact email
Contact email
No
Yes. Claim number on court claims registry (if known)
Filed on
MM
5. Do you know if anyone

Form 293
410
Claim Official
Number:
/ DD
/ YYYY
No
Yes. Who made the earlier filing?
Proof of Claim
page 1
16-11700-smb
Part 2:
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 81 of 212
Main Document
Give Information About the Claim as of the Date the Case Was Filed

debtor?
No
Yes. Last 4 digits of the debtors account or any number you use to identify the debtor:
$ 6,000,000.00
. Does this amount include interest or other charges?

claim?
No
Yes. Attach statement itemizing interest, fees, expenses, or other

secured?
No
Yes. The claim is secured by a lien on property.

Nature of property:
Motor vehicle
Other. Describe:

Value of property:
Amount of the claim that is unsecured: $
(The sum of the secured and unsecured

Amount necessary to cure any default as of the date of the petition:
Annual Interest Rate (when case was filed)
10. Is this claim based on a

lease?

right of setoff?
Official Form 410
Fixed
Variable
No
Yes. Amount necessary to cure any default as of the date of the petition.
No
Yes. Identify the property:
Proof of Claim
page 2
16-11700-smb

11 U.S.C. 507(a)?
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 82 of 212
Main Document
No
Yes. Check one:

priority and partly

11 U.S.C. 507(a)(1)(A) or (a)(1)(B).

Wages, salaries, or commissions (up to $12,850*) earned within 180 days before the
11 U.S.C. 507(a)(4).
) that applies.
* Amounts are subject to adjustment on 4/01/19 and every 3 years after that for cases begun on or after the date of adjustment.
claim entitled to
pursuant to
11 U.S.C. 503(b)(9)?
Part 3:
No
Yes. Indicate the amount of your claim arising from the value of any goods received
$ ____________________
Debtors business. Attach documentation supporting such claim.
Sign Below

sign and date it.
FRBP 9011(b).
is.
years, or both.
18 U.S.C. 152, 157, and
3571.
I am the creditor.
I am the creditors attorney or authorized agent.
and correct.
Signature:
Albert James Daulerio
Albert James Daulerio (Sep 29, 2016)
Signature
Name

First name
Title
n/a
Company
n/a
Middle name
Last name
Identify the corporate servicer as the company if the authorized agent is a servicer.
Address
c/o Marburger Law LLC, 14650 Detroit Avenue, Suite 450

Number
Contact phone
Official Form 410
Street
Cleveland
OH
City
State
216 930 0500
Email david@marburger-law.com
Proof of Claim
44107
ZIP Code
page 3
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 83 of 212
EXHIBIT D
Video Turnover Motion
Main Document
Doc10/06/2016
493 Filed03:36:17
11/28/16 PM
Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12
47350835 E-Filed
Main Document
Pg 84 of 212
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA
TERRY GENE BOLLEA professionally
known as HULK HOGAN,
Plaintiff,
Case No.:
12012447-CI-011
vs.
HEATHER CLEM; GAWKER MEDIA,
LLC aka GAWKER MEDIA, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________________________ /
PLAINTIFFS EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENFORCE PERMANENT

INJUNCTION AND PREVENT A.J. DAULERIO FROM ENGAGING IN
REVENGE PORN, EXTORTION AND VIDEO VOYEURISM
Plaintiff Terry Bollea known professionally as Hulk Hogan (Mr. Bollea) by counsel
and pursuant to the Courts June 7, 2016, Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction (Permanent
Injunction) moves for the entry of an order on an emergency basis enforcing the Permanent
Injunction and, pursuant to and 784.049, 836.05 and 810.145, Fla. Stat., the entry of an order
preventing Defendant A.J. Daulerio (Mr. Daulerio) from violating Floridas Revenge Pom,
Video Voyeurism and Extortion Laws, by requiring Mr. Daulerio to immediately turn over to
Mr. Bolleas counsel any and all copies, excerpts and/or still images of all surreptitiously
recorded, sexually explicit recordings and images of Mr. Bollea, and to verify under oath that he
no longer has any access to or ability to access such recordings and images, and in support states
as follows:
Introduction
Since its inception, this case has always been and will continue to be about a persons
right to stop other people from posting illegally recorded, sexually explicit images of him or her
{BC00102867:1!
* * *ELECTRONICALLY FILED 10/06/2016 03:36:16 PM: KEN BURKE, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, PINELLAS COUNTY***
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 85 of 212
Main Document
on the Internet without their consent. This case is not an attack upon the freedom of press nor
the First Amendment. Its goal has never been to silence the voice of the people nor journalists
who are telling the public about matters of legitimate public concern. Rather, in an age in which
everyone has a camera phone and computer hacks of peoples private nude photos have become
commonplace, the goal of this case has always been to draw a clear line that publishers cannot
cross demarking the point at which journalism ceases to be the giving of information to which
the public is entitled, and becomes a morbid and sensational prying into the private life of
another, with which a reasonable member of the public with decent standards would say that he
or she has no legitimate concern. Seven months ago, a Pinellas County jury drew that line, held
the defendants accountable for crossing it, and sent a message to anyone who might consider
doing the same: dont post illegally obtained, private, sexually explicit images of people on the
Internet without their consent because they are not news. This Court did the same in its
Permanent Injunction.
Incredibly, Mr. Daulerio has not learned anything over the past four years. He still
believes that secretly recorded footage of people having sex can be passed off as news, and
that there are no limits to what he can post on the Internet. In fact, Mr. Daulerio proudly stated
in a recent interview that he believes he can post the entire 30-minute video of Mr. Bollea on his
website, Ratter.com, because he thinks it is completely newsworthy. He even planned to do
so.
Mr. Daulerio even bragged about still having a copy of the entire 30-minute, illegally
recorded encounter.
Mr. Daulerio should not be given the opportunity to follow-through on his threats.
Mr. Bollea should not have to live in fear of being sexually exploited at the whim of an angry
and desperate, self-proclaimed voyeur and deviant, who has threatened to violate this Courts
{BCOOl 02867:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 86 of 212
Main Document
Permanent Injunction and Florida law to try to coerce Mr. Bolela to stop collecting the $115.1
million judgment that Mr. Daulerio owes.
Once again, and almost four years to the day of Mr. Daulerios original Hulk Hogan sex
tape post, Mr. Bollea finds himself being victimized and trying to stop Mr. Daulerio from
publishing an illegally recorded sex tape against Mr. Bolleas will. Only this time, Mr. Bollea is
already armed with a jury verdict, Permanent Injunction and Floridas Revenge Pom, Video
Voyeurism and extortion statutes at his sides. Mr. Daulerio must be stopped before he inflicts
more harm than he has already caused.
Factual Background
Six months ago, Mr. Daulerio and his attorneys stood in a Pinellas County courtroom and
promised the jury, this Court and Mr. Bollea that Mr. Daulerio understood that he could no
longer post explicit, illegally recorded sex tapes masquerading as news, that he would be
deterred by the jurys verdict, and that he had learned his lesson. He has not.
Ex-Gawker Editor Almost Went Into Hiding After Hulk
Hogan Verdict
But AJ Dauterio also had a plan to go out with a bang

" in M c i.c , | S eptem ber 2 8 ,2Q*6 8T1 PM
(BC00102867:1
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 87 of 212
Main Document
As set forth in the above-referenced article,12 on or about September 28, 2016, an

interview of Mr. Daulerio was posted on the Longform Podcast (a copy of the transcript of which
is attached as Exhibit A ), during which he stated, among other things:
MR. DAULERIO: I don't think anybody was going to give me,
the child pomographer, like any sort of money at that point, but
what I did think initially was that, well, all is lost, but I do still
have a copy of the sex tape, and it is completely newsworthy at
this point. I was just like, okay, well, how about I do a post on
Ratter34that says here's what $140 million sex tape looks like, and
then just "peace out," and then just so to Miami, and just like be
on the lam and just do that. And this is what I was planning on
doing. I was getting I was getting phones, like, you know, I was
basically going to get burner phones, I was going to do this all kind
of covert and have, you know, signals and all these people I was
working for, and thankfully some people talked me off the ledge
INTEREVIEWER: Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO: and just said, you know, you're not out of
this yet, obviously, and Gawker is not out of this, and I didn't want
to do anything to jeopardize Gawker more so than I already had in
trial, but that was my first instinct was basically just like, you
know, that that much frustration and that much kind o f anser
and that much sadness over just like what had transpired. It was
just like I had that brief sliver of a revense fantasy so to speak, and
also at that time I said to myself, well, what is a thing that we can
do that makes this a positive experience in some ways for
someone. [Emphasis added.]
Mr. Daulerios thinly-veiled threat to release the entire full length 30-minute Video
confirms the fears Mr. Bollea expressed throughout this case and, most recently, in his request
for the Permanent Injunction. (See Bolleas 5/11/2016 Motion, p. 9-10.) Mr. Daulerio opposed
entry of the Permanent Injunction by representing that: All Denton and Daulerio were saying is
that they still believe that the video excerpts were part of a legitimately newsworthy publication,
1 See Ex. 1 to Affidavit of Gayla Arnold.

2 See Ex. 2 to Affidavit of Gayla Arnold.
3 With funding approved by Gawker Media, LLCs CEO, Nick Denton, Ratter.com is a now-defunct
website still controlled by Mr. Daulerio.
{BCOO102867:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 88 of 212
Main Document
not that they plan to repost the video excerpts, or post any additional sex-tape footage. (See
5/23/16 Opposition, p. 6.) The September 28, 2016 interview makes clear that, once again, this
Court and Mr. Bollea have been misled.
Fortunately, the Court knew better than to take Mr. Daulerios representation at face
value. It entered the Permanent Injunction based in part on findings that Gawker Defendants
continue to possess additional footage of Mr. Bollea, including the full 30-Minute Video that
they received, the contents of which have never been made public... [and that]... while Gawker
Defendants are not currently making the Gawker Video or 30-Minute Video available, there is
no court order currently in place that prohibits them from doing so. (See Permanent Injunction
152.)
For most people, a court order such as the Permanent Injunction (and its attendant threat
of contempt) would be a sufficient deterrent. However, this remains a special case involving
defendants such as Mr. Daulerio who have exhibited complete disrespect for the law and this
Courts authority. For example:
The day after this Court entered its temporary injunction (but before it was
reversed on appeal) the defendants defiantly posted s story headlined: A
Judge Told Us to Take Down Our Hulk Hogan Sex Tape Post. We
Wont. (See Depo. Ex. 227.)
Mr. Daulerio was willing to go to jail in order to post pictures of Brett

Favres penis. (See Depo. Ex. 4; Daulerio 9/30/2013 Depo. pp. 75-77.)
Sealed discovery was leaked to and published by The National Enquirer.

Mr. Daulerio tweeted xoxoxo to Mr. Bollea at 6:52 a.m., within minutes
of the leak being posted. This prompted the Court to enter an electronic
discovery order. (See 10/21/2015 Order; Ex. A to Mr. Bolleas Reply in
Support of Emergency Motion.)
Mr. Daulerio misled this Court about the value of GMGI stock to obtain a
temporary stay of execution. (See 7/29/2016 Order.)
Mr. Daulerio made material misrepresentations about his net worth (most
notably, his indemnity rights), before, during and after trial. (See 8/5/16
{BC00102867:!
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 89 of 212
Main Document
Renewed Motion for Sanctions.) Several of these misrepresentations were

made in filings required by Court Order.
Mr. Daulerios lack of respect and appreciation for this Courts authority is particularly
disconcerting now that Mr. Daulerio claims to have reached the end of his rope and believes he
has nothing to lose.
For example, Nick Denton and Gawker Media, LLC (Gawker)
abandoned Mr. Daulerio after they each filed for bankruptcy protection, leaving Mr. Daulerio
standing alone to face collection. (Somehow, getting $115 million is basically falling squarely
on my head, because, you know, Gawker and Nick have both declared bankruptcy...4)
Mr. Denton secured a $200,000 loan5 for himself from Gawker to retain personal bankruptcy
counsel immediately before Gawker filed for bankruptcy protection, but left Mr. Daulerio
without the same protectioneven though they both held some of the same indemnity rights.
According to Mr. Daulerio, his desperation is exacerbated by his belief that he was
wronged by Gawkers lawyers. (.. .any conversations I would have with the lawyers that were
representing Gawker in this case, it was always bad news, and it was always theres another
worst case scenario, another bad day in court.)6 Throughout this case, Mr. Daulerio apparently
operated under the assumption that because he was indemnified, Mr. Bollea couldnt pursue him
personally. (9/28/16 Trans, p. 17:14-24) However, Mr. Daulerio recently revealed that he was
blindsided by the reality of his personal liability at the last minute. (9/28/16 Trans, p. 17:14-24)
In fact, in the September 28, 2016 interview, Mr. Daulerio states: everything that was told to
me from the beginning about that this would actually impact me personallywas
bullsh*t. (9/28/16 Trans, p. 20:10-18) Mr. Daulerio also contends his lawyers did not advise
him about his indemnity rights due to conflicts. (9/28/16 Trans, p. 18:3-6)
4 See 9/28/16 Trans, p. 10:14-24.
5 According to Mr. Daulerio, he would have needed $30,000 to retain his own bankruptcy counsel. (See
9/28/16 Trans, pp. 16:16-17:13.)
6 See 9/28/16 Trans, p. 9:4-9. [Emphasis added]
{BC00102867:!}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 90 of 212
Main Document
Mr. Daulerio further attributes his desolation to the upcoming October 31, 2016,
sanctions hearing involving, among other things, the concealment of these same indemnity
rights. (9/28/16 Trans, pp. 78:7-79:5) Mr. Daulerio now admits that his indemnity rights have
significant monetary value.
(9/28/16 Trans, pp. 12:24-13:13; 78:7-79:14)
In fact, on
September 29, 2016, Mr. Daulerio filed bankruptcy Proofs of Claim against Gawker, Gawker
Media Group, Inc. (GMGI) and Kinja, Kft. (Kinja), in the amount of $6 million each, based
on the companies duties to defend and indemnify Mr. Daulerio in this case. (A copy of the
Proof of Claim against Gawker, and the Supplement (without exhibits) is attached as Exhibit B).
According to these filings, Mr. Daulerio (who claims he is broke) already owes LSKS $ 190,000
for services rendered from June 10, 2016 through August 31, 2016 (See S. Berlin 9/28/16 letter
attached as Exhibit C), and another $20,000 to his recently retained independent counsel. (See
Marburger Law 9/29/16 letter attached as Exhibit D.)
Unfortunately, Mr. Daulerios anger and frustration over his litany of problems is being
directed solely toward Mr. Bollea, simply because Mr. Bollea is engaging in routine collection
efforts to secure the money Mr. Daulerio owes. Mr. Daulerios last ditch effort to avoid paying
Mr. Bollea entails threatening to engage in revenge pom and video voyeurism by releasing more
or all of the 30-minute, illegally recorded, sexually explicit footage of Mr. Bollea. The timing of
Mr. Daulerios decision to publicly brag about still having a copy of that video footage and his
plan to release it is not a coincidence.
Moreover, Mr. Daulerio persists in his belief that he has every right to publicly disclose
the entirety of the illegally recorded sex tape without Mr. Bolleas consent, and in violation of
Florida law and the Permanent Injunction. In fact, Mr. Daulerio inexplicably claims that it is
7 For example, Mr. Daulerios September 28, 2016 interview was contemporaneous with his filing of the
Proofs of Claim against the Gawker entities.
{BC00102867:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 91 of 212
Main Document
somehow completely newsworthy at this point, even though the jury and this Court have
already concluded otherwise.
Mr. Daulerio cannot be trusted with any sexually explicit footage of Mr. Bollea. He
certainly should not be allowed to keep the means through which he could follow through on his
recent threats against Mr. Bollea.
Argument
Recently, Floridas Legislature recognized what Mr. Bollea has been saying throughout
this case: publishing sexually explicit images of another on the Internet without that victims
consent creates a permanent record of that victims private nudity and private sexual conduct
worldwide, which can be easily reproduced and shared, and causes significant psychological
harm. See 784.09(1 )(b)-(f), Fla. Stat. In order to protect against this harm, an aggrieved
person is entitled to obtain all appropriate relief in order to prevent or remedy a violation of this
section. See 784.09(5)(a), Fla. Stat.
In the Permanent Injunction previously entered in this case, this Court reached the same
conclusions: Publication of the explicit content of the Gawker Video and/or the 30-Minute
Video would violate a clear legal right and cause irreparable injury for which Mr. Bollea has no
adequate remedy at law... Mr. Bollea will suffer irreparable harm unless a permanent injunction
is entered to prohibit further public dissemination of the explicit content of the Gawker Video
and the 30-Minute Video... The publication of the explicit contents of Gawker Video or the 30Minute Video would constitute an invasion of Mr. Bolleas privacy and violation of Florida law
accompanied by extensive harm which an award of monetary damages is insufficient to address.
{See Permanent Injunction ^[f 42, 50, 51.) This Court also specifically found that:
While the jurys award of compensatory damages represents an
attempt to redress the harm and injuries Mr. Bollea suffered in the
{BC00102867:!
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 92 of 212
Main Document
past as a result of the posting of the Gawker Video, several factors

require that an injunction issue to prohibit any further distribution
of explicit audio or visual footage of Mr. Bollea engaged in sexual
activity in a private bedroom....... Second, Gawker defendants
continue to possess additional footage of Mr. Bollea, including the
full 30-Minute Video that they received, the contents of which
have never been made public. (Permanent Injunction f 52)
Accordingly, this Court permanently enjoined Mr. Daulerio from publicly posting,
publishing, broadcasting, or disclosing any nudity or sexual activity, whether video or audio,
contained in the Gawker Video or 30-Minute Video.
However, the Court also reserved
jurisdiction to enforce the Permanent Injunction, and to issue additional relief, including, but not
limited to, an order requiring that Mr. Daulerio and the other Gawker Defendants deliver all
copies of the Gawker Video or the 30-Minute Video, or any excerpts thereof, to Mr. Bollea
and/or his counsel. (Permanent Injunction p. 9, ]j 2) The Permanent Injunction has not been
stayed pending appeal.
Mr. Daulerios desperate situation and his above-quoted threats clearly establish that he
still does not respect the verdict or this Courts authority, and does not fear the consequences of
violating Florida law or this Courts Permanent Injunction. Mr. Daulerio has possession of the
subject recording, and is more than prepared to release it and then go into hiding.
Mr. Daulerio also knows that doing so would be wrong, but believes he has nothing to lose.
Given the overall content and context of Mr. Daulerios September 28, 2016, interview,
in which he states that he will never settle with Mr. Bollea and that Mr. Bollea needs to stop
collection efforts against him, while at the same time threatening the release of the entire 30minute video, Mr. Daulerios conduct also amounts to extortion under Florida law. Florida
Statute section 836.05 provides:
Threats; extortion.Whoever, either verbally or by a written or
printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse another of
any crime or offense, or by such communication maliciously
(BC00102867:1}
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 93 of 212
Main Document
threatens an injury to the person, property or reputation of

another, or maliciously threatens to expose another to disgrace,
or to expose any secret affecting another, or to impute any
deformity or lack of chastity to another, with intent thereby to
extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatsoever, or with
intent to compel the person so threatened, or any other person, to
do any act or refrain from doing any act against his or her will,
shall be guilty of a felony of the second degree, punishable as
provided in s. 775.082. s. 775.083. or s. 775.084.
If Mr. Daulerio were allowed to follow through on his threats, he also would violate
Floridas Video Voyeurism Law, section 810.45, Florida Statutes. Under 810.145(3), a person
commits the offense of video voyeurism dissemination if that person, knowing or having reason
to believe that an image was created [with a secret camera], intentionally disseminates,
distributes, or transfers the image to another person for the purpose of amusement... or for the
purpose of degrading or abusing another person. The jury and this Court already concluded that
Mr. Bollea was secretly recorded naked and having sex in a private bedroom. (Permanent
Injunction ^[11) The jury and this Court also concluded that Mr. Daulerio knew or had reason to
know that Mr. Bollea was recorded without his knowledge or consent. (Permanent Injunction J
12)
Florida law allows its courts to prevent violations of criminal laws. Mid-American Waste
Systems v. City o f Jacksonville, 596 So.2d 1187, 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). That authority
should be exercised to prevent Mr. Daulerio from engaging in revenge porn, extortion and video
voyeurism.
Through this motion, Mr. Bollea seeks to enforce the Permanent Injunction, while
simultaneously seeking protection under Floridas Revenge Pom, Video Voyeurism and
Extortion Laws. A bond is not required for a permanent injunction entered upon a final decree.
International Longshoremans Assoc., Local 146, AFL-CIO v. Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc.,
{BC00102867:!}
10
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 94 of 212
Main Document
206 So.2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). Accordingly, a bond should not be required in connection
with the relief sought herein.
However, to the extent the relief sought herein could be characterized as temporary
injunctive relief, Mr. Bollea is prepared to post a bond. The purpose of an injunction bond is to
provide sufficient funds to cover the adverse partys costs and damages if the injunction is
wrongly issued. Longshore Lakes Joint Venture v. Mundy, 616 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
When setting the bond, the trial court may also consider other factors, including the adverse
partys chances of overturning the temporary injunction. Id.
Here, Mr. Daulerio has already been permanently enjoined from publishing the materials
that Mr. Bollea seeks to have returned and deleted. Mr. Daulerios potential damages, if any, are
de minimus.
His prospects of overturning the relief requested herein are equally miniscule,
particularly given the Permanent Injunction and recent enactment of Floridas Revenge Pom
Law. Consequently, if a bond is required, it should be no greater than $10,000.
CONCLUSION
Time and time again, Mr. Daulerio has proven that he is an angry buccaneering fellow
who thumbs his nose at the law and cannot be trusted. He should not be given the opportunity to
violate Floridas Revenge Pom, Video Voyeurism and Extortion Laws, as well as the Permanent
Injunction. To prevent such misconduct, Mr. Daulerio should not be permitted to retain any
copies or excerpts of any sexually explicit footage, images or recordings of Mr. Bollea,
including, but not limited to, the Gawker Video and 30-Minute Video. Moreover, Mr. Daulerio
should be required to appear before this Court and verify under oath that he: (1) has turned over
to Mr. Bolleas counsel any and all hard copies (i.e., CDs, DVDs, thumb drives) of sexually
8 Mr. Daulerios counsel of record still has a copy of the subject footage, so requiring Mr. Daulerio to
return and delete his copy/copies will not cause any harm, including for purposes of any pending appeals.
{BC00102867:!
11
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 95 of 212
Main Document
explicit video and audio recordings (including all excerpts thereof and still images) of Mr. Bollea
which he possesses; (2) has permanently deleted or otherwise destroyed any and all
electronically stored (i . e computer files, files stored on the cloud) copies of such recordings,
excerpts and images within his possession or control; (3) has no access, or ability to access, any
such recordings, excerpts and images; and (4) verify before this Court the identity of every
person to whom he has ever personally transmitted or afforded access to such recordings,
excerpts and images.
Basis for Emergency Relief
The undersigned hereby certifies that Mr. Bollea seeks the relief set forth herein on an
emergency basis because, as recognized in Florida Statute Section 784.049 and this Courts
Permanent Injunction, the publication of explicit images of Mr. Bollea on the Internet will cause
irreparable and significant psychological harm and create a permanent record of such images
worldwide that can be easily reproduced and shared. Moreover, given Mr. Daulerios past
conduct, current legal and financial situations, mental state, obvious animosity toward
Mr. Bollea, plan to release the footage, and expressed belief that the entire 30-Minute Video is
completely newsworthy at this point, there is a significant and substantial likelihood that
Mr. Daulerio will release the footage at any time.
/s/Shane B. Voet____________________________
Kenneth G. Turkel, Esq.
Shane B. Vogt
BAJO | CUVA | COHEN | TURKEL
100 North Tampa Street, Suite 1900
Tel: (813)443-2199
Fax: (813)443-2193
Email: kturkclfebaiocuva.com
Email: svogt@bajocuva.corn
{BC00102867:1}
12
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 96 of 212
Main Document
-andCharles J. Harder, Esq.

PHVNo. 102333
HARDER MIRELL & ABRAMS LLP
132 South Rodeo Drive, Suite 301
Beverly Hills, CA 90212-2406
Tel: (424) 203-1600
Fax: (424) 203-1601
Email: charder@hmafirm.com
Counsel for Plaintiff
{BC00102867:!
13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 97 of 212
Main Document
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by
E-mail via the e-portal system, this 6th day of October, 2016, to the following:
Gregg D. Thomas, Esquire
Rachel E. Fugate, Esquire
Thomas & LoCicero PL
601 S. Boulevard
pthomasfeftlolawfirm.com
rfuuatcfetlolawfinn.com
kbto wn( a , 11o 1aw ii rm .com
aboencfetlolawfinn.com
Counsel for Gawker Defendants
Seth D. Berlin, Esquire

Paul J. Safier, Esquire
Alia L. Smith, Esquire
Michael D. Sullivan, Esquire
Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP
1899 L. Street, NW, Suite 200
sbcrlin@lskslaw.com
psafierfe lsksla w. com
asmithfelskslaw.com
msullivanfeflskslaw.com
Pro Hac Vice Counselfor
Gawker Defendants
Steven L. Brannock, Esquire

Celene H. Humphries, Esquire
Brannock & Humphries
1111 West Cass Street, Suite 200
Tampa, FL 33606
Michael Berry, Esquire

Levine Sullivan Koch & Schultz, LLP
1760 Market Street, Suite 1001
Philadelphia, PA 19103
mbciTv@lskslaiv.coin
Pro Hac Vice Counselfor
Gawker Defendants
sbrannockffebhatiDcals.com
clnnnphricsffelihappcals.com
cscrvicc@bltappcals.com
Co-Counselfor Gawker Defendants
David R. Houston, Esquire
Law Office of David R. Houston
432 Court Street
Reno, NV 89501
dhoustonffehoustonatlaw.com
krosscrffehouslonatlaw.com
Stuart C. Markman, Esquire

Kristin A. Norse, Esquire
Kynes, Markman & Felman, P.A.
Post Office Box 3396
smarkman@kmf-law.com
knorscfefkmf-law.com
plawhcadfefkinf-law.com
Appellate Co-Counsel for Plaintiff
/s/ Shane B. Vost____________
Attorney
{BC00102867:1
14
Doc 493 Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

47350835 E-Filed
10/06/2016 03:36:17
PgPM
98 of 212
Main Document
EXHIBIT A
to Plaintiffs Emergency Motion to Enforce Permanent
Injunction and Prevent A.J. Daulerio from Engaging in
Revenge Porn, Extortion and Video Voyeurism
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
IN RE:
CASE NO.:
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 99 of AJ
212 Daulerio
TERRY BOLLEA VS. GAWKER MEDIA, LLC

12012447C1011
3
4
5
6
7
8
LONGFORM PODCAST OF
AARON LAMMER AND A.J. DAULERIO
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
Main Document
16-11700-smb
1
2
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 100 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
2
(Thereupon:)
MAX:
It's Max.
Before we get
started, I want to tell you quickly about a
new sponsor we've got on the show.
the School of the Art Institute of Chicago,
specifically their masters in new arts
journalism program.
It's
If you want to learn how to write
about the arts, if you want to learn how to
10
be a cultural critical, this is the program
11
for you.
12
land of fantastic art, and you're not just
13
going to learn how to write, they're going
14
to teach you how to use the full Adobe
15
Suite, you're going to get the basics on
16
HTML and CSS, you can build your own
17
websites, you can learn to write for the
18
internet, not a thing that everyone is
19
teaching you.
20
You're going to do it in Chicago,
The application for this program is
21
February 1st.
If you want some more
22
information, go to SAIC.EDU/longform.
23
That's SAIC.EDU/longform.
24
couple of years in Chicago, learn how to
25
write about art, but for now, listen to the
Go spend a
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 101 ofAJ
212Daulerio
podcast.
MR. LAMMER:
MAX:
MR. LAMMER:
Hi.
Hi Max.
from Detroit.
MAX:
MR. LAMMER:
MAX:
Welcome to your own podcast.

Good to be back.
You were in Detroit, Michigan.
Evan is also on the road.
10
in the studio.
11
sad here.
12
Hey.
Hello, Aaron Lamer.
Main Document
I am all alone
That's lonely, man.
MR. LAMMER:
I'm
I'll tell you this,
13
when I pick up the call, and I hear you on
14
this line, Evan could have been sitting
15
there the whole time, I wouldn't know.
16
MAX:
It's basically a normal intro.
17
MR. LAMMER:
But actually I've been
18
trying to pick up an interview here and
19
there along my path, and this is the first
20
one I've done.
21
and it was with A.J. Daulerio, a guest that
22
I know you've wanted to get on for some
23
time, Max.
24
MAX:
25
the show.
I did it in Los Angeles,
I'm excited that A.J. is on

Anyone who is listening to this
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 102 ofAJ
212Daulerio
show probably knows about A.J.'s time as
the editor of Gawker, and he's been in the
news.
the Hulk Hogan sex tape.
Hulk Hogan's suit.
massive lien against his bank account, and
it's really exciting to have him on the
show.
He was the editor who decided to run

He's named in
He currently has a
It sounds like, Aaron, he sort of
10
wanted to talk about what this has been
11
like for him.
12
Main Document
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah, I mean, I think
13
people who are interested in the purely
14
legal story, it's been pretty well
15
reported, but I think we're the first
16
people that he's talked to about the
17
personal side of what this has meant for
18
him and what it means for journalism and
19
other people who could end up involved in a
20
similar experience.
21
So it's a bit of a cautionary
22
episode, but I really appreciate him doing
23
it, I appreciate him choosing to do it with
24
us, and I'm really excited for who will
25
hear this.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 103 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MAX:
I don't want to take too much
of their time, but quickly, Aaron, we have
a pair of sponsors.
MR.
MAX:
my friend.
LAMME R :
T e ll
me
m ore.
It's that time of year again,

It's FIFA time.
MR. LAMMER:
favorite holiday.
wondering, because you'll notice that our
Oh, my God, it's my

I was actually
10
FIFA playing has trailed off a little bit.
11
We've been in the offseason here.
12
waiting for somebody to motivate us, get
13
back on the court, now -- now we're there.
14
MAX:
We are there.
Been
The latest
15
version of FIFA from EA Sports, our
16
favorite video game for now, what, like --
17
how long were you playing this game, 15
18
years you and I have been playing FIFA.
19
MR.
20
MAX:
LAMME R :
At
le a s t .
It's something absurd.
21
latest version came out yesterday.
22
really describe it to you.
23
it's FIFA, Aaron.
24
It's great.
25
MR.
Main Document
LAMME R :
The
I can't
It's like --
The new FIFA is here.
They
ju s t
keep
m a k in g
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
i t
p la y e r s,
to
g r e a te s t
tim e .
b e tte r
and
a ll
ex p ect
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

P o d ca st AJ D a u le r io
Pg 104 of 212
t h is ,
sam e
not
and
- -
e q u a lly
11
l i f e .
12
v id eo
gam e
sp o rts
been
b ein g
have
14
c o n tr o lle r ?
be
fo r
M A X:
h im
17
m ashes
18
good
th e
19
us
I'v e
th e
as
we
20
su p p orters
21
We
22
FIFA
r e a lly
by
FIFA
How
to
been
b u tto n s,
com e
o p in io n
t e l l
I t ' s
room
th e
o f
not
th e
w ith
you
is
in
back
does
I'v e
and
he
and
h e 's
my
your
on
i t ,
son
on
been
ju s t
a ll
you
i t ' s
h im
- -
y o u 'v e
can
th e
h a n d in g
k in d
lik e
u p d ated
m y self,
o ld
g e t
th e
fr a n c h ise
sam e
even
c o n tr o lle r ,
MR.
23
th e
LAMME R:
13
16
in
but
my
p la y in g .
a d d ic tiv e .
to
in
A b so lu te ly .
have
got
s t u f f
is
MR.
15
th e
what
p la y in g ,
10
a ll
I t ' s
from
M A X:
b e tte r .
Main Document
of
a lm o st
as
are.
LAMME R :
from
W ell,
th e
very
a p p r e c ia te
i t .
thank
you
FIFA ,
b eg in n in g .
Go
check
th a t
out
17.
MAX:
I ' l l
24
an oth er
group
25
w ith
from
us
t e l l
you
an oth er
o f
good
p eo p le
th e
v ery
b eg in n in g ,
who
- have
been
Aaron,
U . S . LEGAL SUPPORT
866-339-2608
16-11700-smb
1
2
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 105 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
it's MailChimp.
MR. LAMMER:
Actually, I just sent
off a MailChimp email or a little project
I'm doing.
download, it's very, very slow, and
I really have to think about every single
web page that I load, because I have to pay
by the megabyte for it.
happier to be with MailChimp, they make
I'm on a Canadian little Wi-Fi
I was never
10
everything so simple, there was no hiccups,
11
there was no going back and fixing stuff.
12
Straight out the door best email provider
13
in the game.
14
MAX:
15
Daulerio.
Thank you MailChimp.

Okay.
Here's Aaron with A.J.
16
MR. LAMMER:
Feel good?
17
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah, yeah, I mean,
18
I have to like go through this process
19
where I'm like don't be glib, don't be
20
glib, don't be glib.
21
MR. LAMMER:
Is that out of a
22
self-preservation -- is that -- is that
23
like a
24
or you don't want to come across as glib?
25
is that you don't want to be glib
MR. DAULERIO:
I don't want to come
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 106 ofAJ
212Daulerio
across as glib.
lot of the way I've answered things in the
past, I mean, it's a lot of
self-deprecation and sarcasm, so I'll try
to answer things as directly as possible.
I mean, I
MR. LAMMER:
I know that a
Well, I mean, I feel
like very few people end up in a position
where the glibness of their commentary can
have repercussions deep into their life
10
11
like this.
MR. DAULERIO:
That's true.
Yeah,
12
I definitely didn't anticipate this, this
13
is -- you never get presented with
14
something along those lines where how you
15
are, where you've worked, things that
16
you've said can, you know, bankrupt a
17
company and also just like leave you with
18
$115 million in debt to a professional
19
wrestler at this point.
20
MR. LAMMER:
Okay.
So how many
21
years of your life has this been the
22
dominant theme of now?
23
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Well, it's
I left
24
Gawker in January 2013, but I think
25
it really started about September of 2013
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 107 ofAJ
212Daulerio
where the invisible handcuffs started to
come on --
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Yeah.
and that any
conversations I would have with the lawyers
that were representing Gawker in this case,
it was always bad news, and it was always
there's another worse case scenario,
another bad day in court.
And, you know,
10
the original defendant list which I believe
11
was eight or nine had gone down to just
12
myself and Nick and Gawker Media.

And, you know, then there was some
13
14
paranoia that had set in, I believe, at
15
that point, and this was always something
16
that was looming, and it wasn't something
17
that was constant, it was something that
18
every three weeks or so I would have a
19
conversation with the lawyers who would
20
tell me that they need more emails, they
21
need my computers, they need my phone, they
22
need me to remember things in a certain
23
way.
24
25
I mean, all the stuff that goes into

kind of at least constructing what would be
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 108 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
a -- a case, but also being a little bit on
the outside of it, because I was no longer
working at Gawker Media, and I think the
interpretation by some of the lawyers was
that I was a minor player in this.
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
Especially if it's
something that's a civil suit, I don't have
a $100 million.
10
11
I was employed by this
company.
MR. LAMMER:
At what point did you
12
realize that a person might be liable for
13
the journalistic actions of a company?
14
MR. DAULERIO:
I still don't
15
know the answer to that, because I'm --
16
because I'm still -- we're at the beginning
17
stages of another part for me, and it still
18
has this -- this creep factor to it,
19
somehow getting $115 million is basically
20
falling squarely on my head, because, you
21
know, Gawker and Nick have both declared
22
bankruptcy, and I think the feeling was,
23
was that, well, they're not going to go
24
after me personally at this point.
25
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah, because your
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
10
16-11700-smb
1
2
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 109 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
assets are not in the $115 million range.

MR. DAULERIO:
No, nor are Gawker's
or Nick's for that matter, but obviously,
I mean, there's more at play here.
trial is kind of irrelevant into what's
happening now, because what's happening now
is obviously Peter Thiel is bank rolling
this revenge plot, and the lawyers on the
other side have to
The
this is what
10
unlimited billable hours do, keep these
11
things tied up.
12
MR. LAMMER:
13
MR. DAULERIO:
Right.
They can do all these
14
things.
15
happening to me in terms of just what
16
someone sees as harassment or bullying, I
17
mean, are perfectly legal.
18
are they ethical?
19
answer that, but --
20
All these things that are
I mean, are --
I don't know, I can't
MR. LAMMER:
It's a technique that
21
actually could be applied outside
22
journalism also.
23
part of the American justice system, is
24
there's no real penalty for jamming it.
25
It's sort of a dangerous
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah, and, you
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
11
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 110 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
know --
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
A filibuster.
And you know, that's
the part of it that's extremely tough to
process, is that, you know, after going
through the theatricality of that trial and
the traumatic experience that was that
trial for, I think, everyone involved, and
then to try to move on, and I -- as soon as
10
I began to start to think about what would
11
be the next phase of my life, this whole
12
$115 million judgment comes crashing down
13
on my head, and I don't know why.
14
I think the only reason why that
15
happens, and I'm sure the other side has
16
their theories as well, that is what's
17
this money that is being bankrolled by
18
Peter Thiel is affording these guys to do,
19
which is to try to drive a wedge between
20
myself and Gawker, to try to just, you
21
know, pin what's happening to me on like
22
how Gawker betrayed me or how these guys
23
left you out to dry.
24
And -- and the one thing that's been
25
important to me and which was actually the
U .S.
LEGAL SUPPORT
866-339-2608
12
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16
Entered
22:37:12
Podcast
AJ 11/28/16
Daulerio
Pg 111 of 212
Main Document
good part of this phase, if there is a good
part, is that I've also had to kind of take
on my own lawyers at this point, obviously
without any money, so there's been a lot of
pro bono work done on my behalf at this
point, but the first couple of lawyers that
I talked to, I told them, just like, look,
your job is to say no to these people.

Like I'm
as much as they want to
10
kind of hold my life hostage right now and
11
any kind of settlement talks begin and end
12
for them with an NDA and confidentiality
13
agreement, and I won't do that.
14
15
16
17
MR. LAMMER:
Confidentiality around
what?
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
19
MR. DAULERIO:
21
22
talking about
the case, talking about the trial.
18
20
What
that
Okay.
Anything -- anything
anything that --
MR. LAMMER:
Like the very
conversation we're having right now --
23
MR. DAULERIO:
24
MR. LAMMER:
25
restricted by it.
Absolutely.
-- would be -- would be
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 112 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Yeah, the way -- the
way this is set up is basically just like
maybe this will come back to bite me in the
ass.
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
I mean, absolutely
will.
My thought process at this point is
just like, okay, well, I have $115 million
hanging over my head.
They're treating
10
it like it's 10 grand and they're trying to
11
collect --
12
MR. LAMMER:
13
MR. DAULERIO:
I
Yeah.
-- and acting like,
14
yes, I
and of course, legal, I do
15
owe this money, and up until the appeals
16
process, they can do very, you know,
17
aggressive and invasive things in order to
18
try to collect on that.
19
MR. LAMMER:
Have they done invasive
20
things to try to collect?
21
MR. DAULERIO:
22
MR. LAMMER:
23
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah, of course.
Yeah.
I went through a
24
whole, you know, what they call a financial
25
colonoscopy which, you know, required me to
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
14
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 113 ofAJ
212Daulerio
go through my last four months of spending
habits, and anything over $100 they then
grilled me about, trying to kind of what
I call like "dad me up" over like my
spending habits over the last six months.
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
Like acting like,
well, you should have been saving for this
$115 million judgment.
10
MR. LAMMER:
Saving -- saving so you
11
can get another couple of thousand dollars
12
out toward them on the -- yeah.
13
MR. DAULERIO:
Exactly, and he was
14
like, you know, well, jeez, you shouldn't
15
have spent $100 on golf, and you should
16
have bought yourself a lawyer at this
17
point.
18
MR. LAMMER:
19
MR. DAULERIO:
20
Yeah.
And I'm like, you
know, that's the part that's frustrating.
21
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
22
MR. DAULERIO:
Because look, he's
23
doing his job, but his job right now is to
24
be an asshole to
25
MR. LAMMER:
m e.
Yeah.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
Main Document
15
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 114 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
And that's the part
that obviously I got in trouble in my first
deposition in terms of not reacting well,
so I have to kind of go into that to kind
of be bullied in some capacity by attorneys
who have -- are trying to get information
that they're legally allowed to do, but I'm
waiting for logic to prevail.
to just like have him say, just like, oh,
I'm waiting
10
well, this doesn't make any sense, you
11
clearly don't have $115 million.
12
MR. LAMMER:
13
MR. DAULERIO:
Right.
And the appeals
14
process is coming, and we will wait until
15
that point.
16
MR. LAMMER:
And declaring
17
bankruptcy would mean you don't get the
18
opportunity to make this appeal?
19
MR. DAULERIO:
In order for me to
20
declare bankruptcy to protect my thousand
21
dollars that was in my checking account at
22
that time --
23
MR. LAMMER:
24
MR. DAULERIO:
25
Yeah.
-- would cost me
about 30 grand to hire a bankruptcy
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
16
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 115 ofAJ
212Daulerio
attorney, and every bankruptcy attorney,
I mean, was excellent in terms of being
very transparent about the fact that just
like, you know, you are against a very
aggressive plaintiff right now.
$115 million judgment which could be
disputed in bankruptcy court, so you're
essentially going in to file for
bankruptcy, and then potentially have it
10
unblocked.
11
protect your $1,000 or this $115 million
12
you still may owe, and you'll also lose
13
your representation in Florida.
14
Main Document
You'll spend 100 grand to
That was what was -- I was told
15
really at last minute type of situation,
16
because I mean, ultimately I'm operating
17
under the assumption that because I am
18
indemnified by Gawker that -- and they're
19
not going to come after me personally for
20
this at this point, at this juncture, that
21
this was not something I necessarily had to
22
concern myself with, and, you know,
23
I was -- I may have been naive about that,
24
I don't know, I don't know --
25
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
17
16-11700-smb
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 116 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
it all happened so
quickly.
MR. LAMMER:
I mean, they didn't
even offer you advice about this.

MR. DAULERIO:
Exactly, there were
so many conflicts at that point.

MR. LAMMER:
Oh, when I was sued for
$115 million here was my game plan.

MR. DAULERIO:
Well, that
and
10
that -- and that was the part where it's
11
just like you're still having these
12
discussions with these attorneys, the
13
attorneys that have been representing
14
myself and Gawker throughout this whole
15
entire time whom I've gotten to know fairly
16
well, obviously, for the past three years,
17
and who are trying to explain to me, you
18
know, well, if you file for Chapter 7
19
bankruptcy -- filing for Chapter 7
20
bankruptcy, it's not easy.
21
something --
22
23
24
25
MR. LAMMER:
It's not
Yeah, it's not supposed
to be easy.
MR. DAULERIO:
It's not something
where, you know, a Turbo Tax situation.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
18
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 117 ofAJ
212Daulerio
It's some pretty dense paperwork --
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
-- that, I mean,
if I screw up will then possibly come back
to haunt me, and I'm -- and I'm weighing
all these options, and I'm still like, you
know, why is this happening.
Main Document
And then 24 hours, less than that,

I get an alert from Chase Bank, who is very
10
good about their alerts, that there is a
11
hold on my bank account for $230 million,
12
which was put thereby Pinellas County
13
Courthouse courtesy of one Terry Bollea,
14
and I'm like, okay, now what do you do.
15
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
16
MR. DAULERIO:
And it was
it was
17
funny, because Chase had like said
18
something in the lines, well, we're waiving
19
the processing fee, I'm like all right.
20
These guys are excellent, but at that point
21
when you're looking at this number, which
22
looks like a pinball score
23
MR. LAMMER:
24
MR. DAULERIO:
25
Yeah.
and there's --
well, do I get overdraft fees for -- how do
866-339-2608
19
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 118 ofAJ
212Daulerio
I -- do I stop banking there?
just freezes.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Everything
Yeah.
And so then I have no
access to kind of get any money to any
perspective lawyers, I have like
everything
9
10
Main Document
MR. LAMMER:
And you were living in
Florida at the time.

MR. DAULERIO:
I was living in
11
Florida at an Airbnb which I had rented and
12
paid in advance for, which was
13
was running out soon, but it was not really
14
that was the problem, in was more that that
15
number, it was just like, okay, everything
16
that was told to me from the beginning
17
about that this would not actually impact
18
me personally --
19
MR. LAMMER:
20
MR. DAULERIO:
21
M R . LAMMER:
22
MR. DAULERIO:
my lease
Yeah.
was bullshit.
Yeah.
And that at this
23
point this is what we see is what could
24
potentially happen to someone else.
25
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
20
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16
Entered
22:37:12
Podcast
AJ 11/28/16
Daulerio
Pg 119 of 212
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
The one part that
I think that most -- I would be very happy
to be a journalist right now in this time
period, because you can see exactly where
the monsters are.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
Regardless of just
thinking of what you think of me or what
you think of Gawker, you can see that
10
Charles Harder who is basically the firm
11
that, you know, is representing Hulk Hogan,
12
his business is booming right now.
13
14
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah, he's representing
all kinds of -- he's got
15
MR. DAULERIO:
16
MR. LAMMER:
17
18
19
Exactly.
Yeah, he's got the
Trump's got -- got -- I mean -MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah, and this isn't
going to stop any time soon.
20
MR. LAMMER:
21
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
And I think that most
22
people who are just going -- critical of
23
Gawker or any of (Inaudible), I hope it's
24
out of their system.
25
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
21
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 120 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Because, you know,
right now, I mean, especially just with the
hints that, you know, Roger Ailes is going
after Gabriel Sherman and New York Magazine
and stuff like that.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
a Gawker problem anymore.
9
10
Yeah.
MR. LAMMER:
It's clearly not just
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
And that's the part
11
that
12
that somebody has to stop it.
it's worthwhile for people to know
13
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
14
MR. DAULERIO:
And the only way to
15
actually stop it is for journalists to do
16
their job at this point, but I also
17
understand how tough it is for publishers
18
in this environment who are going to kind
19
of just like actually have to make a
20
decision where it's just like, okay,
21
if we are going to say something negative
22
about someone who is powerful or actually
23
has access to Charles Harder's law firm at
24
this point, is that worth the risk, is that
25
worth the story, and that's something that
866-339-2608
22
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 121 ofAJ
212Daulerio
is, I think, has not been as black and
white as it is right now.
MR. LAMMER:
Well, I think it would
be -- it's interesting, I didn't even draw
the connection.
show two weeks ago, three weeks ago.
Gabriel Sherman was on the
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
Main Document
Uh-huh, right.
So we potentially have
two guests in a one-month span who are both
10
going to be the subjects of lawsuits from
11
the same law firm.
12
with enough money, these lawsuits can be an
13
exponential force.
14
scale operation --
It -- it shows you that
It's not a hard to
15
MR. DAULERIO:
16
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
-- suing people in
17
these sorts of situations.
18
discriminate journalistically across a wide
19
spectrum of different forms of journalism.
20
I mean, the things that Gabriel Sherman is
21
reporting is that Ails probably had him
22
tailed, had him investigated.
23
MR. DAULERIO:
24
MR. LAMMER:
25
It doesn't
Yeah.
And may have discussed
killing him.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
23
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 122 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Right.
Yeah.
There's people -- all
the people who said there's a conversation
in the room where Ails talked about killing
him, that should be more on people's mind
as a sort of a check on who has more power
in this balance.
MAX:
Hey, I'm going to pause things
10
here to give you a quick word from our
11
sponsor, Casper.
12
that created one perfect mattress and
13
sells it directly to consumers eliminating
14
the commission-driven inflated prices that
15
you probably have experienced in some kind
16
of a warehouse.
17
Casper is a sleep brand
It's an award winning sleep surface
18
developed in house, has a sleek design, and
19
it's delivered in a small
20
how-did-they-do-that-sized box.
21
addition to the mattress, Casper also
22
offers an adaptive pillow and soft
23
breathable sheets.
24
will have you sleeping better immediately.
25
It's a pack with latex and supportive
In
This is a pack that
866-339-2608
24
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 123 ofAJ
212Daulerio
memory foam.
less than you pay almost anywhere.
It's a pack that costs a lot
You're usually going to pay over
1,500 bucks for a mattress.
from 500 for a twin up to 850 for a queen,
950 for a king.
mattress.
can keep it for one hundred nights with
absolutely no obligation.
10
Main Document
Casper's range
Anyway, buy a Casper
It's completely risk free.
You
If you don't it, they'll pick it up
11
for you, but I think you're really going to
12
like it, and I think it's going to change
13
the way you sleep.
14
go to Casper.com/longform.
15
bucks off any mattress, and you'll be
16
supporting the show.
17
So I encourage you to
You get 50
Again, Casper.com/longform.
Use the
18
offer code "longform," support Longform and
19
sleep so much better today without the
20
hassle.
Thank you, Casper.
21
Our next sponsor is Texture.
22
Texture has put all of the magazines you
23
love in one superconvenient place.
24
is that place?
25
you tap into the world's most popular
The Texture app.
Where
They let
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
25
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16
Entered
22:37:12
Podcast
AJ 11/28/16
Daulerio
Pg 124 of 212
magazines anytime, anywhere using your
smart phone or tablet.
Main Document
You can breeze through hundreds of
3
4
your favorite magazines including back
issues and pick the articles that interest
you most.
list here, Bloomberg Business Week, ESPN
the Magazine, Hollywood Reporter.
I'm just browsing through this
If you read Longform, you're going
10
to recognize a lot of these magazines, and
11
you're going to enjoy them.
12
made it easy to find the articles you care
13
about.
14
I also get recommendations from the Texture
15
editorial team, plus deeper dive personal
16
collections.
17
Texture has
I don't get just the magazines,
Anyway, I really like it.
Sign up
18
for Texture right now and gain insider
19
access to all the content from the world's
20
best publications, Texture.com/Longform.
21
That's right, you go there, you get a free
22
trial.
23
Texture.com/Longform, gain immediate entry
24
to all the top magazines and start binge
25
reading today.
It doesn't cost anything.
Again,
Thank you, Texture.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
26
16-11700-smb
1
2
3
4
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16
Entered
22:37:12
Podcast
AJ 11/28/16
Daulerio
Pg 125 of 212
MR. LAMMER:
How did you come to
Gawker in the first place?

MR. DAULERIO:
I originally came to
Gawker back in 2005.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Yeah.
And that was to -Simpler times.
Yeah, definitely,
and, you know, I was there to run a now
10
dead gambling blog called Odd Jack.
11
the job not based off of anything that
12
I knew about gambling or poker.
13
mimic what I thought was a Gawker voice at
14
the time, and Lockhart had offered me that
15
job, then he fired me six months later when
16
there was no traffic on that cite.
17
Got
I tried to
I mean, it was the total blogger in
18
Odd Jack.
19
they used to do initially back in the 2005
20
era where mostly you were paid per post
21
(Inaudible) at the end of the month.
22
If you were under a certain threshold, you
23
got maybe half your pay.
24
25
I mean, there was this thing
So at the end of the month there

would always be this routine where there
866-339-2608
27
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 126 ofAJ
212Daulerio
would be three days left, and I would be
like 85 posts short.
frantically basically do lines on every
single college football game there was
between Division I and III and just throw
them up in this mad dash to basically get
paid that month.
Main Document
So then I would
And, yeah, I used to always get
those kind of just very bemused emails from
10
Lockhart at the end of the month, basically
11
just like, wow, you hit the quota right on
12
the nose again, which, you know, they let
13
me slide with.
14
But when I was at Deadspin the
15
second time around, I just had a vision for
16
Deadspin that just like we were going to
17
have a blog site, we were going to have a
18
longer form side.
19
started to put those things together.
20
I mean, we had already
I knew I could get traffic, I knew
21
I could do the scummy stuff that Will
22
wouldn't touch --
23
MR. LAMMER:
24
MR. DAULERIO:
25
Yeah.
-- and we would have
no qualms about it, because that was the
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
28
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 127 ofAJ
212Daulerio
business part of it for me.
part, we wanted to have a site where
basically those things could live in the
same world.
MR. LAMMER:
Main Document
The writing
Yeah, I was a Gawker
reader, I've always read this stuff.
I always kind of felt like the dirtier,
scummier stuff was going to like stain the
good work that was done.
10
MR. DAULERIO:
11
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
Not bring down the
12
whole ship in a -- in a -- you know, in a
13
flaming disaster.
14
something you were building --
So as that duality was
15
MR. DAULERIO:
16
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
-- did you ever sort of
17
say -- like look at whether it's the tips
18
box and the stuff is going in, kind of, you
19
know, hunting for scandal really.
20
MR. DAULERIO:
21
MR. LAMMER:
Right, yeah.
Like, oh, God, we could
22
go too far, this could be a problem.
23
that even like in the room as that stuff
24
was building up?
25
MR. DAULERIO:
Was
Well, it's kind of
866-339-2608
29
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16
Entered
22:37:12
Podcast
AJ 11/28/16
Daulerio
Pg 128 of 212
interesting you say that, because I think
that every Gawker editor at some point has
a moment where they're staring over a
Main Document
4
5
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
-- in terms of just,
you know, very hesitant about pushing the
"publish" button knowing that there's going
to be some blow back.
10
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
11
MR. DAULERIO:
And either -- and
12
then there could be a story, especially,
13
and this was kind of at the -- at the time
14
I remember the moment when Gizmodo broke
15
the iPhone 4 story.
16
MR. LAMMER:
Totally.
17
MR. DAULERIO:
And I was in awe of
18
them.
I was just like this is the greatest
19
thing I've ever seen in my entire life.
20
The news cycle has stopped and is
21
absolutely focusing on this story, and, you
22
know, obviously, they got a lot of flack
23
for it, too --
24
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
25
MR. DAULERIO:
-- and were
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
30
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 129 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
criticized for it, but everyone was talking
about it.
3
4
5
6
MR. LAMMER:
Apple sent the police,
right, to -MR. DAULERIO:

broke down his door.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
9
10
Yeah, DC10, they
Yeah.
And, you know, as bad
as that was, I mean, I'm like sitting there

just like absolutely just like so envious.
11
MR. LAMMER:
12
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
And I'm just like,
13
God, I wish I could do something that would
14
absolutely have that type of impact.
15
MR. LAMMER:
It felt like sort of
16
breaking the journalistic fourth wall where
17
I was like --
18
MR. DAULERIO:
19
MR. LAMMER:
20
Yeah.
I thought this is
all supposed to be like --
21
MR. DAULERIO:
22
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
page view fun and
23
games here, no one was supposed to like
24
SWAT someone.
25
MR. DAULERIO:
Exactly, and that
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
31
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 130 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
was -- and that was a part, but I mean,
it was just like, you know, all -- like all
of the publications that I had admired
going into it like always had that whiskey
feel to it.
I mean, just like I said, Jeff
Koyen's New York Press was so influential
just because of him, and I remember having
this moment where he took me up to Lit,
10
that bar on the Lower East Side at one
11
point, and he was about to publish, but
12
it was this full issue dedicated to the
13
assassination of George W. Bush, and the
14
whole issue was dedicated to if that had
15
happened.
16
And it was
like my eyes lit up.
17
I was just like, man, this is like the
18
coolest thing I've ever seen in my entire
19
life, and like, I mean, it was just I love
20
that rush --
21
M R . LAMMER:
Yeah.
22
MR. DAULERIO:
-- kind of just like
23
I was getting from him talking about it,
24
and I was just like that's -- that's kind
25
of just the way I'm wired.
I knew that
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
32
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16
Entered
22:37:12
Podcast
AJ 11/28/16
Daulerio
Pg 131 of 212
I was wired that way as an editor, and
I always
know, I used to call it the professional
wrestling of blogging.
I always loved that part, you
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
(Inaudible.)
Yeah.
Yeah.
But I mean -- and
I always felt that just a good editor for
10
Gawker or any of the Gawker sites was
11
someone who kind of took on that role.
12
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
13
MR. DAULERIO:
But that I would take
14
on that role, and the rest of the staff
15
could actually be smart and great and do
16
the things that were actually just, you
17
know, the things that I love to read.
18
19
You know, my byline I always

considered was just ten percent of my job.
20
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
21
MR. DAULERIO:
And that ten percent
22
was always done for just kind of business
23
purposes.
24
I considered it.
25
That's just like how
MR. LAMMER:
The pro wrestling, I'm
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
Main Document
33
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Main Document
sorry, it's a good analogy.
2
3
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 132 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. DAULERIO:
I know, but it sucks
now.
MR. LAMMER:
The
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
That interplay among
the editors and the writers and the
readers, and that's sort of -- I think it's
some of the stuff that's made the tone of
10
this whole Gawker affair hard to read,
11
because, you know, the people who were
12
writing for Gawker and editing for Gawker
13
in that period were really talking to a
14
very specific audience that almost knew you
15
as characters.
16
MR. DAULERIO:
17
MR. LAMMER:
18
Yeah.
Like I never met you
before.
19
MR. DAULERIO:
20
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
Until you walked into
21
this room, I kind of had known you as like
22
a character.
23
MR. DAULERIO:
24
MR. LAMMER:
25
Right.
You played -- and you
play up a certain kind of like
U.S.
LEGAL SUPPORT
866 339-2608
-
34
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 133 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
scumbagginess and character, but then I'm
also sitting across the room from someone
who is basically sacrificing years of their
life toward a higher (Inaudible.)
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
And I don't actually
find that incongruous, but I can see how to
a person sitting reading U.S.A. Today --
MR. DAULERIO:
10
MR. LAMMER:
11
are easy to lose.
12
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
the nuances of that
They are, and I think
13
that that's -- you know, a lot of the part
14
that also gets lost in this -- these
15
stories don't age well.
16
also just like, you know, a lot of where
17
Gawker's nuance comes in is the speed of
18
it, too.
19
MR. LAMMER:
20
MR. DAULERIO:
21
Remember just like
Yeah.
We're also in a very
different environment online --
22
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
23
MR. DAULERIO:
to where a lot of
24
these things that -- I mean, I think
25
would -- would clearly be jokes are done
866-339-2608
35
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 134 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
for shock value are just kind of just put
to a different type of audience and kind of
just like scrutinized a lot differently as
well.
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
The one part that
was -- like I mentioned a thing about, you
know, staring over a cliff --
9
10
MR. LAMMER:
When I had Leah
Finnegan on this show, and she also -- the

way she described it was a finger hovering
12
over a button and falling off a cliff.
13
I think if we go back, she used both of
14
those exact phrase --
15
MR. DAULERIO:
16
MR. LAMMER:
17
18
19
20
Oh, really.
-- phrases to describe
that moment, so it must be

MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah, I didn't work
with her.
MR. LAMMER:
It must be something
21
that haunts the dreams of editors who have
22
been in that position.
23
in how you saw that line and whether you
24
had regrets prior to this, which I don't
25
know that you do regret this particular
Like I'm interested
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
36
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 135 ofAJ
212Daulerio
thing.
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
But, you know, among
the many times that your finger hovered
over the button and you hit or did not hit
"send."
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
9
10
Huh.
Like what was that
experience like?
MR. DAULERIO:
I mean, it's --
11
it's -- there -- there are certain stories
12
that you want back for different reasons
13
than -- none of them are because they were
14
published, let's put it that way.
15
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
16
MR. DAULERIO:
It's usually because
17
they're executed in a way that may have
18
fallen flat or may have kind of been
19
misinterpreted.
20
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
21
MR. DAULERIO:
Some things that
22
I had written that I wish I had the budget
23
to farm out to another writer.
24
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
25
MR. DAULERIO:
Those sort of things,
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
Main Document
37
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 136 ofAJ
212Daulerio
and one major story that I wish I had the
budget to farm out to another writer was
the Brett Farve story, actually.
MR. LAMMER:
Main Document
Which in some ways is
probably the most well-known story that you
are a part of prior to the Hulk Hogan
story.
8
9
MR. DAULERIO:
yeah, exactly.
that was
I mean, just it's one of
10
those things where I mean, I consider the
11
thing that I love the most is kind of being
12
the producer of websites in that kind of
13
role --
14
MR. LAMMER:
15
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
16
writers that I love --
17
MR. LAMMER:
18
MR. DAULERIO:
and working with
Yeah.
and trying to
19
figure out a way for them to kind of enjoy
20
the job as much as I do in some ways, and
21
my byline is just filled with dicks.
22
that's -- that's also the -- the role that
23
I took on.
24
kind of delegitimize those stories.
25
It's not
MR. LAMMER:
But
I don't want to
Yeah.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
38
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 137 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
The Brett Farve story
is not about his dick.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
What his dick did was
basically prove that the woman who told me
about this story about him sexually
harassing him was true.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Right.
10
MR. LAMMER:
11
MR. DAULERIO:
That's what that did.

Yeah.
But, you know, this
12
notion that because we paid for it, that
13
information, or that it was done for page
14
view purposes on clicks or however people
15
want to say it, all that did was kind of
16
just put nine months of work to bed and say
17
just like, yeah, she was not lying, she's
18
not an opportunist, and if we're not going
19
to hold Brett Farve accountable for his
20
personal life, why are we always kind of
21
talking about his wife's illness or his
22
father's death or his struggle with
23
Vicodin.
24
And every single person that
25
I talked to in main stream media who was
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
39
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 138 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
covering Brett Farve knew about this story.
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
Like, I mean, that's
the fight.
couldn't do it in that way, because they
had just heard about it, they hadn't seen
any evidence of it.
And, you know, they obviously
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
MR. DAULERIO:
And Brett Farve was
10
the most famous quarterback on the planet
11
at that point.
12
year, and a lot of television companies and
13
the NFL had built a lot of the season
14
around his last year.
15
He was going into his last
MR. LAMMER:
It's interesting, a lot
16
of the way this stuff ends up getting
17
talked about is through pages and clicks as
18
if like doing a -- like in-depth, like
19
months-long investigation is like the
20
easiest cheapest way to get how many clicks
21
you got on that story.
22
MR. DAULERIO:
23
MR. LAMMER:
24
25
Whatever, yeah.
It's not -- it's not a
one-to-one relationship like that.

MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
40
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 139 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. LAMMER:
But as you're going
after stories like this, was there ever
oversight from above about what you should
and shouldn't do?
MR. DAULERIO:
God or Nick Denton?
MR. LAMMER:
Are we talking about
Nick Denton or any --
or anyone else, but yeah, Nick Denton
(Inaudible.)
10
11
Main Document
MR. DAULERIO:
Like Nick and I,
we have the editorial DNA --
12
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
13
MR. DAULERIO:
-- ultimately, and
14
I think that's a lot of the reason why
15
we did get along mostly.
16
MR. LAMMER:
17
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
And I think that
18
he felt like that I was probably the person
19
who was catering to his kind of instincts
20
more than anyone else.
21
M R . LAMMER:
22
MR. DAULERIO:
23
Yeah.
So I had a lot of
(Inaudible.)
24
MR. LAMMER:
25
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
And, you know, that
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
41
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 140 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
was -- you know, that's a level of autonomy
that you can't -- it's irreplaceable in a
lot of ways.
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
I mean, I knew that
I was in kind of a situation where just
like, wow, you know, here's a guy that is
supporting me on a lot of this stuff.
9
10
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
Even though
even
11
though there was a huge backlash from, you
12
know, readers or other publications --
13
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
14
MR. DAULERIO:
-- or I have people
15
calling me an asshole or monster or
16
whatever and all this stuff, and this guy
17
was, you know, always the first in line to
18
basically say just, you know, how are you,
19
and then I'd be just like, man, I'm like
20
kind of just beaten up over this.
21
He's just like, all right, take a
22
day, but then get right back to it, because
23
you're
24
about what we were doing was true.
25
there was never any question
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
42
16-11700-smb
1
2
3
4
5
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 141 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
It was just -- it was
always a point where just, oh, is this

MR. LAMMER:
Is that like a loud
form of (Inaudible.)
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah and I think --
I think there's some of that, and I'm
like -- believe me, I mean, I'm the first
to admit that I -- I reveled in the heel
factor of some of the stuff I was doing.
10
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
11
MR. DAULERIO:
I didn't have any
12
question about just like, you know,
13
whether -- if it was right, it was true,
14
I wasn't throwing shit against the wall
15
just to kind of start a reaction.
16
I made sure that all that stuff was pretty
17
airtight.
18
MR. LAMMER:
19
MR. DAULERIO:
I --
Yeah.
And then I was going
20
to take the backlash anyway, because at
21
some point it's just like, you know, my --
22
my vantage point is just like the people
23
that matter the least for a publication are
24
the readers and other people in the media.
25
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
43
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
MR
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 142 ofAJ
212Daulerio
DAULERIO:
The person -- the
people that I end up putting forward first
are the writers and that's it.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Yeah.
And especially at an
operation like Gawker where you're on a
shoestring budget, per se, and you don't
have the same sort of, you know, cushion to
kind of, you know, have fact checkers and
10
all that other stuff like online.
11
you really kind of have to put yourself out
12
there as the last line of defense --
13
MR
LAMMER:
14
MR
DAULERIO:
You --
Yeah.
-- in terms of just
15
like, okay, if there's going to be an
16
asshole in this situation, it will be me.
17
MR. LAMMER:
18
MR. DAULERIO:
19
Yeah.
And everybody else
can look smart.
20
MR. LAMMER:
21
MR
Yeah.
DAULERIO:
And but when I edited
22
Deadspin and when I edited Gawker, I think
23
most people confused my byline with the
24
rest of the site.
25
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
44
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 143 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. DAULERIO:
And, you know, that,
you know, Gawker 2012, which is always
probably going to be remembered for the
Hulk Hogan story, unfortunately.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Yeah.
And, you know,
interesting enough in terms of just like,
like I said, stories that I stared over the
cliff about --
10
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
11
MR. DAULERIO:
-- Hulk Hogan was not
12
one of them.
13
people ended up with in court which was
14
also like -- you know, most people I think
15
that was just like, oh, that's going to
16
trial, wow, that's weird --
What about the version that
17
MR. LAMMER:
18
MR. DAULERIO:
19
this toilet fire happen.
20
Yeah.
MR. LAMMER:
and let's watch
If I was suing Gawker
21
and I wanted a story to sue Gawker over,
22
it wouldn't have been my pick, right?
23
MR. DAULERIO:
24
MR. LAMMER:
25
Urn, yeah.
It's not the
it's
not the most out-there thing Gawker did,
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
45
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 144 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
it's not -- it didn't get the most traffic.
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
random story in a way.
It's
MR. DAULERIO:
No.
it's kind of a
And it was kind --
it was -- what it was was a more -- it was
just an outgrowth of the way that I had
done Deadspin.
MR. LAMMER:
10
Right.
MR. DAULERIO:
I mean, I had become
11
known for doing those very splashy tabloid
12
sleazy, scumbaggy stories.
13
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
14
MR. DAULERIO:
And that was
15
something that I embraced in some way, so
16
obviously people who like the gentleman who
17
sent me the Hulk Hogan tape are going to
18
come to m e .
19
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
20
MR. DAULERIO:
21
MR. LAMMER:
22
MR. DAULERIO:
I understand that.
Right.
What I never wanted
23
to do with that was present it as a sex
24
tape.
25
tape.
It was more a story about a sex
866-339-2608
46
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16
Entered
22:37:12
Podcast
AJ 11/28/16
Daulerio
Pg 145 of 212
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
MR. DAULERIO:
And more than
anything it was a meditative piece, and
I don't want to put too much of a halo
around it.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
8
9
10
Yeah.
But if you read the
way it's constructed, it's 1,400 words.

MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
It's a 33-minute tape
11
that's spliced down to a minute which is
12
basically just to show that, you know,
13
okay, the guy that was out there recently
14
just talking about this story in TMZ, and
15
this is already in the public sphere --
16
MR. LAMMER:
17
MR. DAULERIO:
18
19
Yeah.
I got ahold of it,
this is what this is all about.

MR. LAMMER:
So has this experience
20
made you rethink anything about your
21
experience at Gawker, like what kind of a
22
lens do you see those years on now with
23
this removed?
24
25
MR. DAULERIO:
Well, obviously
there's a part -- like when the first
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
Main Document
47
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 146 ofAJ
212Daulerio
judgment was handed down, especially the
punitive damages --
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
-- that were handed
down.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
How long was that?

I guess March at this
point.
MR. LAMMER:
9
10
March.
MR. DAULERIO:
Okay.
So the end of --
11
well, the verdict came on my birthday,
12
actually.
MR. LAMMER:
13
14
15
Main Document
Oh, happy birthday to
you.
MR. DAULERIO:
That was wonderful,
16
but once the punitive damages came down,
17
and they wanted to give me $100,000 in,
18
I believe, yard work for the State of
19
Florida for all eternity, it was obviously
20
something that seemed steep in its own way,
21
but at the same time I began to think of
22
that as, okay, that's a tax that I would be
23
willing to pay, because I loved that
24
experience at Gawker so much.
25
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 147 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
You have to
understand that, you know, that site during
that year, there were four site leads on
that staff.
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
Between Leah
Beckmann, Max Read, John Cook, and Emma
Carmichael.
9
10
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
MR. DAULERIO:
The rest of the staff
11
was Adrian Chen and Neetzan Zimmerman and
12
Rich Juzwiak and Camille Dodero and Cord
13
Jefferson.
14
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
15
MR. DAULERIO:
It's a site that will
16
never exist again with that caliber of
17
people.
18
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
19
MR. DAULERIO:
They were all people
20
who were really hitting their stride for
21
what they were going to do after Gawker --
22
MR. LAMMER:
23
MR. DAULERIO:
24
25
Yeah, I mean
or at least after
that year.
MR. LAMMER:
Adrian was, what, 23
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
49
16-11700-smb
1
2
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16
Entered
22:37:12
Podcast
AJ 11/28/16
Daulerio
Pg 148 of 212
or 24 years old at that point.

MR. DAULERIO:
No, I don't I think
he was -- I mean, he was -- he was there
for three years at that point.

Yeah.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
8
9
But he was -He's a young man
now he's writing for the New Yorker

MR. DAULERIO:
Well, I mean,
10
the -- and the system that I had put into
11
place was ultimately one that I wanted the
12
writers to kind of have the time to do the
13
things they really wanted to do.
14
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
15
MR. DAULERIO:
I didn't want them to
16
hate Gawker, I didn't want them to feel
17
like they were fulfilling some sort of
18
quota --
19
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
20
MR. DAULERIO:
but this was all
21
about traffic for me.
22
business problem I needed to solve, so
23
I hired Neetzan.
24
MR. LAMMER:
25
MR. DAULERIO:
I -- traffic was a
Right.
And it's like there's
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
Main Document
50
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 149 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
your traffic.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
And then the rest of
the staff, I said to them, just like go do
whatever the fuck you want
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
and let's make the
site work for you as opposed to you working
for the site, because I mean, it's
10
traffic is something that you inherit with
11
any Gawker property.
12
you know, how you basically get other
13
people to take advantage of that audience,
14
that's -- that's what I think the job of
15
the editor is, is to basically just like
16
have the writers on that staff enjoy that
17
privilege of basically just having a huge
18
audience all the time, because it's very
19
interesting that once you either leave
20
Gawker, how that goes away real quickly.
21
It's there.
Like,
That year was so special to me just
22
because of like the people that worked
23
there and the people that worked there, you
24
know, how close they were to one another
25
and how everyone really believed in this
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
51
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 150 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
style of doing Gawker, that, you know,
having -- having it kind of just completely
obliterated --
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
-- by, you know, both
critics on the outside and then obviously
legally, it was -- it was something that
I was just like, oh, well, that's a
bittersweet ending in some ways.
10
MR. LAMMER:
It's pretty rare that
11
anyone would say, oh, I would still feel
12
like that was worth it, that I worked that
13
job that year, even if my salary was --
14
MR. DAULERIO:
15
MR. LAMMER:
16
17
Right.
negative $100,000
for it.
MR. DAULERIO:
Well, you know,
18
that's -- that's the thing, it's just like
19
I did, and I actually written a story for
20
Max Read at Select All spelling that out
21
when I thought it was just a $100,000 that
22
I owed.
23
MR. LAMMER:
24
MR. DAULERIO:
25
Yeah.
Because at that point
once the Peter Theal came -- was revealed.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
52
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16
Entered
22:37:12
Podcast
AJ 11/28/16
Daulerio
Pg 151 of 212
this was after --
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
I was just like, oh,
well, this is just like Nick and Peter
Theal.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
8
9
10
Main Document
Yeah.
They're not going to
go after me.
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah, this is going to
be like ended with like a charity -charity boxing match or something.
12
MR. DAULERIO:
Well, it was also one
13
of those things where before the trial
14
I was running a site called Ratter.
15
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
16
MR. DAULERIO:
I was doing it for
17
two years, and it was a startup and was
18
just at the precipice of basically were
19
we going to raise more money and continue
20
or were we going to shut it down.
21
to put it on hold until after the trial to
22
see where the trial left me.
23
I wanted
Probably not the best time to raise
24
money for a website at that point that's
25
basically in the image of Gawker being run
866-339-2608
53
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 152 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
by m e .
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
I don't think anybody
was going to give me, the child
pornographer, like any sort of money at
that point, but what I did think initially
was that, well, all is lost, but I do still
have a copy of the sex tape, and it is
completely newsworthy at this point.
I was
10
just like, okay, well, how about I do a
11
post on Ratter that says here's what $140
12
million sex tape looks like, and then just
13
"peace out," and then just go to Miami, and
14
just like be on the lam and just do that.
15
And this is what I was planning on doing.
16
I was getting -- I was getting
17
phones, like, you know, I was basically
18
going to get burner phones, I was going to
19
do this all kind of covert and have, you
20
know, signals and all these people I was
21
working for, and thankfully some people
22
talked me off the ledge --
23
MR. LAMMER:
24
MR. DAULERIO:
25
Yeah.
and just said, you
know, you're not out of this yet,
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
54
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 153 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
obviously, and Gawker is not out of this,
and I didn't want to do anything to
jeopardize Gawker more so than I already
had in trial, but that was my first
instinct was basically just like, you know,
that -- that much frustration and that much
kind of anger and that much sadness over
just like what had transpired.
It was just like I had that brief
10
sliver of a revenge fantasy so to speak,
11
and also at that time I said to myself,
12
well, what is a thing that we can do that
13
makes this a positive experience in some
14
ways for someone.
15
MR. LAMMER:
16
MR. DAULERIO:
Yes.
So I began making
17
monthly donations to the NAACP in the name
18
of Hulk Hogan, and then I told the lawyers
19
that, and they freaked out.
20
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
21
MR. DAULERIO:
Rightfully so, and,
22
you know, it's obviously something, too,
23
that I -- but my thought was just like,
24
okay, well, you know, obviously everybody's
25
an asshole out of this thing, but, you
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
55
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 154 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
know, let's not forget the racist guy.
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah, yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
If I have to pay for
this, why don't I start paying it now, but
I'm going to start paying it in his name to
the NAACP.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
And I did do that,
and then my checking account got shut down,
10
so but also now that all my spending is
11
basically being kind of raked over the
12
coals and I'm being poked and prodded --
13
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
14
MR. DAULERIO:
-- for every single
15
amount of spending that I do, because it's
16
all supposed to go toward him in some
17
capacity, it's not the best idea right now,
18
even though I think it's a great one and
19
I think it's obviously one that's necessary
20
in order for anyone to kind of come out of
21
this with somewhat clean hands.
22
23
MR. LAMMER:
What's -- I mean,
what's you're existence like right now?
24
MR. DAULERIO:
25
MR. LAMMER:
I
Are you able to work.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
56
16-11700-smb
1
2
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 155 ofAJ
212Daulerio
are you able -MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah, I started --
I started a new job, I'm not able to
disclose at this point, but I did move out
here to L.A. to work.
6
7
8
9
10
Main Document
MR. LAMMER:
Here in lovely Downtown
Los Angeles.
MR. DAULERIO:
I have a limited
amount of money that I can make at this

point.
11
MR. LAMMER:
Got it.
12
MR. DAULERIO:
And a limited amount
13
of money that I can take in and, you know,
14
a lot of friends and family have been
15
helping me out just until I get everything
16
straightened out legally, which is not
17
really kind of straightened out that this
18
is going to go away but what they are going
19
to take from me at this point, what
20
possessions of mine they can take.
21
You know, they have -- Hulk Hogan
22
I think owns 44.8 percent of Ratter and all
23
my Gawker stock and everything that he can
24
take at this point legally he's allowed to
25
take it.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
57
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 156 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
And I still have to find a
collections attorney in California who will
let me know exactly what the exemptions are
here, but in the meantime, I will be
hassled for the $115 million that I have to
pay back up until hopefully the appeals
process reverses it.
8
9
MR. LAMMER:
I mean, what has this
been like for you personally?
I mean, your
10
comments in the deposition are certainly
11
like the main thing that got recorded about
12
you in the trial --
13
MR. DAULERIO:
14
MR. LAMMER:
I know, right.
-- not so much that you
15
have spent years of your life fighting
16
against a unjust verdict.
17
and I don't really even feel like it's a
18
particularly arguable position, but, you
19
know, what is it like for people you know,
20
people who are not in the like New York
21
media journal -- journalism circle to have
22
this --
23
MR. DAULERIO:
In my opinion,
Well, I had two funny
24
experiences with that where it just like
25
was -- and I've had these experiences
866-339-2608
58
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 157 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
before where stories blowup.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
And, you know, people
have from my past have reached out to me,
et cetera.
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
And just like, you
know, what the hell are you doing with your
life, this is a strange existence.
10
At the
time after the video deposition had

dropped, I was back in, you know, the hotel
12
in Florida just not paying attention to
13
anything, because you do this long enough,
14
you don't have to see what people are
15
saying on Twitter to just feel it, you
16
know.
17
18
19
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah, it's a low hum,
yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
And the text messages
20
I was getting from people, I mean were
21
from people that, you know, I was very
22
close to basically just like were showing
23
their support and obviously like that.
24
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
25
MR. DAULERIO:
And then I had a
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
59
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 158 ofAJ
212Daulerio
friend of mine from high school who I
hadn't spoken to in four or five months,
and he was in London at the time, and
he Face Times me, and he's basically like
A.J., it seems like you're involved in a
child pornography ring.
what I can do, no questions asked.
Just let me know
Just like -- I'm like, no, obviously
that's not it, but he was clearly reading
10
the scroll and my comments --
11
M R . LAMMER: Yeah.
12
MR. DAULERIO:
13
MR. LAMMER:
14
MR. DAULERIO:
about what was
Yeah.
-- I said in, you
15
know, that deposition, but yeah, that
16
was -- that was a -- a tough moment.
17
It was a tough moment to process on every
18
single level that you would think it would
19
be.
20
years.
21
Main Document
I knew it was coming clearly for two
Looking back on that day in that
22
deposition, I mean, ultimately what I was
23
thinking was that there was a person across
24
from me who was asking me the same question
25
time and time again who was trying to take
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
60
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 159 ofAJ
212Daulerio
away a thing that I loved.
to basically not give them anything and
also just did my best to try to keep
control --
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
I did my best
Yeah.
at that point, but
then there was that moment --
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
- where it was hour
10
eight or so, and I -- there was also
11
remember, there was no trial at this point,
12
this was just for the purposes of kind of
13
information gathering.
14
MR. LAMMER:
It was a bunch of like
15
lawyers sitting in a conference room kind
16
of situation.
17
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah, I was a year
18
away from Gawker at that point, and, you
19
know, I came into that with a lot of
20
attitude and was there to basically mumble
21
and grunt and give them a hard time.
22
was my thinking in my head, and never in a
23
minute thinking that this would come back
24
to haunt me in the way that it did, nor the
25
company in that way.
866-339-2608
That
61
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 160 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
But -- and after --
after I got out of that deposition,
I remember chatting with Tommy, and he was
just like
great, I didn't give them shit, I didn't
give them anything.
one part.
9
10
Main Document
I was just like, man, I did
MR. LAMMER:
Well, there was this
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
And, you know, but --
11
but never thinking that. A, people would
12
take it literally, and I understand just so
13
you know how it was edited and presented in
14
court and presented to a jury of six who
15
were not happy to be there
16
MR. LAMMER:
17
MR. DAULERIO:
18
19
20
21
Yeah.
-- and obviously
think of the media some way as not me.

MR. LAMMER:
And we're in Florida
just in general.
MR. DAULERIO:
Well, but
but
22
I think
23
consider that something like that can and
24
will be used against you in a court of law
I think that, hey, you never do
25
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
62
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 161 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
-- even though that
that is something that is basically
engrained in everyone's head, and that was
definitely something that I didn't -- this
was never going to go to trial in my mind.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Right.
I mean, this was
something that was going to be settled.
10
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
11
MR. DAULERIO:
And, you know, that
12
was the part of this where I knew something
13
was amiss was the fact that it was not,
14
because I didn't think that Hulk Hogan, who
15
had seemingly suffered all of this
16
embarrassment from this publication and who
17
has, you know, had his world turned upside
18
down over this would actually want to
19
suffer the indignity of revisiting it in a
20
trial format where like a lot more people
21
would potentially hear about it who may
22
have not.
23
MR. LAMMER:
24
MR. DAULERIO:
25
Yeah.
So that was the part
where I was just like this is something
U.S.
LEGAL SUPPORT
866 339-2608
-
63
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 162 ofAJ
212Daulerio
that's kind of bigger than anything that's
happening -- going to happen in this
courtroom.
MR. LAMMER:
Did you feel like
Gawker supported you in the ways they
should have?
Main Document
MR. DAULERIO:
It's a question I go
over in a lot of ways, and the short answer
is basically just I think everyone was in
10
over their head.
11
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
12
MR. DAULERIO:
I don't think anyone
13
knew exactly just like what the full scope
14
of this was going to be.
15
Gawker at the time was also trying to
16
basically protect their company as best as
17
they possibly can.
18
MR. LAMMER:
19
MR. DAULERIO:
I think that
Yeah.
I think that I was in
20
a situation which, I mean, especially after
21
the Geithner story had run, that, you know,
22
Gawker was in this mode of being 20 percent
23
nicer, which I think was just ultimately a
24
protective way for Nick to kind of just
25
like distance, try to basically, you know.
866-339-2608
64
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 163 ofAJ
212Daulerio
have the
above some of this stuff, even though that
this was the thing that was actually going
to trial.
the good Gawker kind of rise
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
I realized I did not
fit in that 20 percent nicer category in
any way, shape, or form.
9
10
Main Document
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
And I knew I was
11
going there, and they had told me this.
12
I mean, I entered into Florida never having
13
met some of the lawyers that were
14
representing me, them having not met me,
15
and I get presented with a manilla folder
16
with basically every single thing I've ever
17
done on the internet that could now be
18
presented in this Court to basically make
19
me look like an asshole.
20
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
21
MR. DAULERIO:
And I was just like,
22
well, how do I
because you can't
23
apologize.
24
an asshole, you are expressionless, which
25
is mostly what they told me to be the whole
Like, I mean, you smile, you're
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
65
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 164 ofAJ
212Daulerio
time.
you're going to be perceived.
Main Document
You're a sociopath, that's how
And I knew that, and it was -- it
was something that everyday was basically
just, okay, you're going to get punched in
the face today, they're going to go hard on
you today.
We're going to take this, and they
shouldn't be coming after you.
10
Just sit there and take it.
They're
after the money, which is Gawker.
11
I -- I think that it was clear that
12
I was a major part of what the plaintiff
13
was trying to present as the story of who
14
Gawker was.
15
Yeah, but I don't think anybody can really
16
kind of prepare you for exactly what was
17
going on there, because it didn't seem
18
real.
Did I feel under prepared?
19
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
20
MR. DAULERIO:
It seemed at some
21
point someone would just kind of just like
22
either move on, or just like, okay, what's
23
the issue at hand here, but it wasn't,
24
it was -- it was troubling on all fronts.
25
I -- I -- I hated the way we were
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
66
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 165 ofAJ
212Daulerio
going after Hulk Hogan and his family and
just like showing pictures of him and his
family at that time.
is all dirty pool.
an ugly situation.
I was just like this

This is basically like
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Right.
And then everyone
like after it was basically, well, that's
kind of what happens in trial.
10
MR. LAMMER:
11
MR. DAULERIO:
12
13
right.
Main Document
Yeah.
And just like, all
So there's no truth at all.

MR. LAMMER:
Well, it's an ugly
14
situation that the stakes had no real
15
reason to exist.
16
you know, I don't know, the Pentagon papers
17
or something.
I mean, it's one thing,
18
MR. DAULERIO:
19
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah, yeah.
You know, a legal
20
battle about an American atrocity or
21
something like that.
22
MR. DAULERIO:
23
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
This is about -- this
24
is an argument that only has stakes in --
25
through -- in the justice system, otherwise
866-339-2608
67
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 166 ofAJ
212Daulerio
it really is a totally meaningless,
frivolous chapter in human history --
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Exactly.
-- in almost every way.
Yeah, so I mean, like
I mean, my -- I was -- I was shell shocked
and just completely just defenseless in a
lot of ways, and that's how I felt.
the worst feeling in the world, and that
It was
10
year was kind of -- I knew -- I knew it was
11
going to be bad, I didn't know it was going
12
to be apocalyptic in any sort of way,
13
because I didn't think that was possible of
14
happening.
15
I don't think most people did.
MR. LAMMER:
I mean, is it right to
16
say that this sets a precedent that a
17
writer on the internet or an editor on the
18
internet is equally liable
19
MR. DAULERIO:
20
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
for what they
21
publish to the publisher even if the
22
publisher instructed them to publish that
23
sort of thing --
24
MR. DAULERIO:
25
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
and it was perhaps
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
68
16-11700-smb
1
2
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 167 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
even part of the terms of their employment?

MR. DAULERIO:
Here's the thing,
they obviously did not instruct me to
publish that.
have -- I, like a lot of other Gawker
editors, had a lot of editorial freedom,
especially at that time.
I mean, I had a lot
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
you
Sure.
I mean, Gawker was a
10
different company in 2012 than it is now or
11
was in 2015, 2014.
12
MR. LAMMER:
And it was a company
13
set up by design to give editors that
14
editorial freedom.
15
MR. DAULERIO:
Yes, and you make
16
those decisions basically just like never
17
about the -- the risking kind of just like
18
having the company fall into the ocean is
19
never -- like that's never a moment where
20
you're basically this is going to happen
21
with this story.
22
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
23
MR. DAULERIO:
I never felt that
24
with that story, especially since it was
25
vetted internally.
866-339-2608
69
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 168 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Yeah.
I mean, there's a
reason it s a minute and 4 seconds.
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
MR. DAULERIO:
I mean, there's a
reason the snippets of sex that are shown
are there.
to all of the stories that had already been
talking about this tape.
There's a reason we linked back
10
MR. LAMMER:
11
MR. DAULERIO:
12
MR. LAMMER:
13
Right.
So -And Gawker was fighting
off __ i mean, Gawker was used to lawsuits.
14
MR. DAULERIO:
15
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
Like part of the Gawker
16
business involved knowing that they would
17
be sued.
18
MR. DAULERIO:
19
MR. LAMMER:
20
MR. DAULERIO:
Of course.
Yeah.
And that's -- I think
21
any tabloid publication is basically just
22
like subjected to that.
23
knows that end of it.
24
but -- and you definitely don't feel safe
25
one hundred percent of the time, but this
Everyone kind of
It's not pleasant,
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
70
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 169 ofAJ
212Daulerio
was one where it's like this was not an
option where I was presented with this,
it's just like, look, you're really
risking -- really putting the company as
risk by publishing this story.
Main Document
That conversation never happened,
and I don't think many, many people have
had that conversation at Gawker, and that's
not to say that just like anything was
10
just -- it's not as reckless as that
11
sounds, but at the same time, the editors
12
had -- it was the editors' judgment in
13
terms of just like what was something that
14
people would read.
15
MR. LAMMER:
Well, it's
16
impossible
I mean -- okay.
17
scenario to throw at 2012 A.J. Daulerio.
18
MR. DAULERIO:
19
MR. LAMMER:
20
Here's a
Yeah.
In four years you'll be
owing $115 million to Hulk Hogan
21
MR. DAULERIO:
22
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
-- as a result of a
23
lawsuit by Peter Thiel
24
MR. DAULERIO:
25
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
who is being talked
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
71
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 170 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
72
1
about as a potential supreme court justice
under the presidency of Donald Trump.
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
Yes.
That -- like how on
Earth do you plan for these kind of
eventualities.
MR. DAULERIO:
Well, and thats the
thing is just like I had gone over that
scenario actually and prepared for that
10
question specifically in terms of just like
11
going back in time and, you know, this
12
is -- I hope this doesn't incriminate --
13
I mean, what the fuck is there to lose at
14
this point, obviously, but, you know, I'm
15
saying this -- like if I had that
16
conversation with Nick, and Nick and I are
17
sitting there basically just saying this
18
story will result in this culture war.
19
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
20
MR. DAULERIO:
If it smokes out
21
those enemies, yes, you absolutely do it.
22
I think Nick fights this one hundred
23
percent of the way.
24
like just end Gawker.com, no, nobody would
25
absolutely do that.
If it can potentially
And, you know, that
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 171 ofAJ
212Daulerio
wasn't
risk here, you know.
that wasn't -- that wasn't at
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
But, you know,
ultimately, I mean, this is -- this is
something -- as -- as sleazy as the story
is, all this is, is basically just like me
catching a powerful person lying.
9
10
Main Document
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
MR. DAULERIO:
That's it, and
11
that's -- you know, the -- the sex tape
12
factor of it, basically if people just want
13
to kind of just look at it and say, oh,
14
this is what you get for publishing a sex
15
tape, I also question basically just like
16
their interest in this story.
17
nobody is kind of interested in that case
18
if it's about a lien against Hulk Hogan's
19
house.
20
MR. LAMMER:
21
MR. DAULERIO:
Like I mean,
Right.
So like, I mean,
22
I think a lot of people are getting kind of
23
self-righteous over something that, I mean,
24
they're basically participating in at the
25
same time.
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
73
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 172 ofAJ
212Daulerio
MR. LAMMER:
Right.
MR. DAULERIO:
So the fact that
it is a story and it's still one hundred
percent a story --
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
story forever, unfortunately --
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
10
11
12
-- and will now be a
Yeah.
That is something
that was never in doubt for me.

MR. LAMMER:
You bring up this idea
of smoking out the enemies.
13
MR. DAULERIO:
14
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
And now that it is
15
pretty clear that Gawker is not the end
16
target but --
17
MR. DAULERIO:
18
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
-- that there is a
19
larger target of suing journalists and
20
publishers out of business and using the
21
infinite resources of at least one person,
22
Peter Thiel, but it's a tactic that could
23
be replicated --
24
MR. DAULERIO:
25
MR. LAMMER:
Absolutely.
-- mostly by the rich
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
Main Document
74
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 173 ofAJ
212Daulerio
people, what do we do?
here?
MR. DAULERIO:
What can be done
Well, I mean, here's
the thing.
not going to settle at all.
this thing gets to the appeals court, I'm
not settling.
this is obviously something that's hanging
over my head, this is not something I wish
Like I said, I am not -- I am

Like until
This is an inconvenience,
10
upon anyone else.
11
MR. LAMMER:
12
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah.
I'm getting through
13
it by persevering, and that's it.
14
cannot for the life of me sign a piece of
15
paper that in any way puts me on that side
16
of the table.
17
I -- I think that more than ever, like
18
I said, this would be a really great time
19
to be a journalist.
20
I still
I just can't do it, and I
Everybody talks about this chilling
21
effect, it's already happened.
22
you that there are publishers that are
23
basically just absolutely backing off
24
things or --
25
Main Document
MR. LAMMER:
I guarantee
And there's
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
75
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 174 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
22-year-olds listening to this show who are
going do I want like a career in internet
writing where I'm liable, you know.
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah, and it's just
like -- remember also like this is not --
this is not about just whether or not
I publish a sex tape for why I got in
trouble.
to basically set a company through this
This was a thing that was picked
10
kind of grinder, and if it wasn't this
11
case, there were five other ones coming
12
right after it.
13
I mean, this was
this was a
14
tactical approach that will probably be
15
used against other people who piss off
16
powerful people on the side of the media.
17
I'm in a good position right now where it's
18
basically like I have no wife, I have no
19
kids, I have no house, I have none of the
20
assets and the trappings that can
21
ultimately kind of be -- I mean, I'm never
22
going to get a great mortgage rate on a
23
house, I don't think.
24
25
You know, ultimately, I mean,

that -- that's the thing that I had to kind
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
76
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 175 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
of just make that decision when I was
offered a settlement that was just
atrocious in my mind, which was essentially
just say basically, all right, you know,
it's sign away and say that you basically
just like this is all your fault, or it's
not all your fault, it's all Nick's fault,
or sign a piece of paper that basically
just like incriminates everyone, or
10
basically just like has to capitulate to
11
like the demands of people who are
12
absolutely just -- this has nothing to do
13
with Hulk Hogan at this point.
14
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
15
MR. DAULERIO:
He's just one guy
16
sitting at the other end of the table with
17
an uncashed lottery ticket --
18
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
19
MR. DAULERIO:
and I'm at the
20
other end, and the part -- the thing is, is
21
just like, you know, I'll be able to kind
22
of get through this hopefully for a year or
23
two.
24
people about it, because it's just like one
25
of these things that is going to be
I'm not going to talk to a lot of
U.S.
LEGAL SUPPORT
866 339-2608
-
77
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 176 ofAJ
212Daulerio
ongoing, and I have to kind of just --
I have good days and bad days about it.
I hope I wasn't yelling too much or
sounding too bitter about it this whole
time.
MR. LAMMER:
MR. DAULERIO:
Main Document
Not at all.
Because that's the
part about this that's really hard is
definitely being trapped, and also that
10
feeling of being trapped and kind of just
11
not only being trapped but still I have a
12
hearing on October 31st where I'm basically
13
going to be sitting in front of that judge
14
who is going to kind of decide whether or
15
not I was lying on my financial affidavit
16
about these indemnity rights which
17
apparently are worth money, that I was
18
lying about them to cover up this fact, and
19
then she can fine me some more.
20
Like that's preposterous, but that's
21
the way the legal system works right now,
22
and that's the position that I'm in.
23
you know, the choices ultimately just like
24
they're giving me are kind of just like
25
take back everything you loved about Nick,
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
And,
78
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 177 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
Gawker, and your job, and we'll give you
your thousand dollars back, or your ability
to make money, or you can walk away from
this, but you just can't talk about it ever
again.
I don't see there's any question for
me.
hard about it, and I've definitely talked
to a lot of people about it.
10
11
I mean, I definitely thought long and
It's just not
in m e .
Some days I absolutely just like
12
wish I can say like is there a phone call
13
I can make to make this all go away,
14
because I want my life back.
15
MR. LAMMER:
Yeah.
16
MR. DAULERIO:
That's happened, but
17
for the most part I -- I just think I would
18
regret doing that.
19
That's it.
MR. LAMMER:
Well, thank you for
20
being so open about this.
21
back on if you ever want to talk about
22
it again.
23
in a couple of years.
24
25
You're invited
I'd love to know where you are
MR. DAULERIO:
Yeah, I mean, I think
that -- hopefully, that's -- I mean, that's
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
79
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 178 ofAJ
212Daulerio
the part about this, I would like to talk
about this in another capacity after Phase
17 of this happens.
MR. LAMMER:
All right.
Main Document
Well,
I hope that people listening -- man, this
episode made me a little emotional, I'll be
honest.
MR. DAULERIO:
MR. LAMMER:
Uh-huh.
I got a little like
10
weird teary voice there.
11
listening, guys, that if this is what can
12
be done to someone over a --
13
MR. DAULERIO:
14
MR. LAMMER:
I hope you were
Blog post.
-- meaningless blog
15
post, what are the stakes of the actually
16
important truths that many people who are
17
on this show are working on, and see you in
18
a couple of years.
19
MR. DAULERIO:
20
MAX:
Yeah.
And that was the Longform
21
Podcast.
Thank you very much to A.J.
22
Daulerio for doing this.
23
cohost Max Linsky and Evan Ratliff for
24
holding down the fort in my absence.
25
you to our editor, Mickey Capper.
Thanks to my
Thank
Thank
866-339-2608
80
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 179 ofAJ
212Daulerio
you to our intern, Courtney Perell.
you to our sponsors, EA Sports FIFA 17,
MailChimp, School of the Art Institute of
the Chicago, yeah, Casper, Texture.
you all.
Thank
Thank
We'll be back here next week.
(End of recording.)
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Podcast
Pg 180 ofAJ
212Daulerio
Main Document
CERTIFICATE
3
4
I, Matthew J. Haas, Court Reporter and
5
6
Transcriptionist, do hereby certify that I was
authorized to and did listen to and
stenographically transcribe the foregoing
recorded proceedings and that the transcript is a
10
true record to the best of my professional
11
ability.
12
13
14
15
16
Dated this 29th day of September

2016 .
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
MATTHEW J. HAAS
Court reporter
24
25
U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT

866-339-2608
82
Doc10/06/2016
493 Filed03:36:17
11/28/16 PM
Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12
47350835 E-Filed
Pg 181 of 212
Main Document
EXHIBIT B
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 10/06/2016 03:36:16 PM: KEN BURKE, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, PINELLAS COUNTY***
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 182 of 212
Main Document
U nited S ta te s B an k ru p tcy C ourt, S o u th e rn D istrict o f New York

Official Form 410
Proof o f Claim ___________________________________________ 4m

Read the instructions before filling out this form. This form is for making a claim for paym ent in a bankruptcy case. Do not u se this form to
Filers m ust leave out or redact information that is entitled to privacy on this form or on any attached documents. Attach redacted copies of any
mortgages, and security agreements. Do not sen d original docum ents; they may be destroyed after scanning. If the documents are not available,
A person who files a fraudulent claim could be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. 152,157, and 3571.
Fill in all th e information about the claim as of th e date the case w as filed. That date is on the notice of bankruptcy (Form 309) th at you received.
Id e n tify th e C laim
creditor?

Name of the current creditor (the person o r entity to be paid for this claim)
Other nam es the creditor used with the debtor

acquired from
som eone else?
3.
Where should notices

and payments to the
creditor be sent?
Federal Rule of
(FRBP) 2002(g)

one already filed?
A.J. Daulerio
^ No
Yes. From whom?
Where should notices to the creditor be sen t?
Where should payments to the creditor be s e n t? (if

different)
Marburger Law LLC attn: David Marburger

Cleveland, OH 44107
Contact phone
216 930 0500 ______________
Contact
Contact email
david@marburger-laW.COm
Contact email
1^ No
Yes. Claim number on court claims reaistrv (if known)
phone
Filed on
MM
5.
Claim
Do you know if anyone

95
/ DD
I YYYY
No
Yes. Who made the earlierfilina?
Proof of Claim
page 1
16-11700-smb
P art 2:j
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 183 of 212
Main Document
Give Inform ation A bout th e Claim a s of th e D ate th e C a se W as Filed

debtor?
(3 No
Q yes. Last 4 digits of the debtor's account or any number you use to identify the debtor:
S 6 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 -0 0 ________________ Does this amount include interest or other charges?

Of No
Q Yes. Attach statement itemizing interest, fees, expenses, or other

Claim'

secured?
0 No
y es ypg c|a m s secured by a lien on property.
Nature of property:
Q Motor vehicle
Other. Describe:
______________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________
Value of property:
$__________________
$.
Amount of the claim that is unsecured: $__________________ (The sum of the secured and unsecured
Amount necessary to cure any default as of the date of thepetition:
$.
Annual Interest Rate (when case was filed)_______ %

Fixed
Variable
10. Is this c l a i m based on a
lease?
No
Yes. Amount necessarv t o cure anv default as of the date of the D e titio n .

right of setoff?
0 No
Q Yes. Identify the prooertv:
Official Form 410
Proof of Claim
page 2
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 184 of 212
Main Document
Si No

11 U.S.C. 507(a)?
Yes. Check one:

priority and partly

11 U.S.C. 507(a)(1)(A) or (a)(1)(B).
$____________________ _

$________________
Q Wages, salaries, or commissions (up to $12,850*) earned within 180 days before the
11 U.S.C. 507(a)(4).
$ ________________
$ ________________
$ ________________
$ ________________
) that applies.
* Amounts a re subject to adjustment on 4/01/19 and every 3 years after that for c a s e s begun on or after the d ate of adjustment.

claim entitled to
pursuant to
11 U.S.C. 503(b)(9)?
No
Q Yes. Indicate the amount of your claim arising from the value of any goods received
Debtor's business. Attach documentation supporting such claim.
$.
Sign Below
sign and date it.
FRBP 9011(b).

is.
years, or both.
18 U.S.C. 152,157, and
3571.

Si
I am the creditor.
I am the creditor's attorney or authorized agent.
and correct.
Signature: ^ ' l a ^ e s
33
Albert JamoB-Sahleiio (Sep ?9. 2016)
Signature
Name
Albert James Daulerio (bom 1974)______________________

First nam e
Middle nam e
Last name
Title
n/a__________________________________________________
Company
nla__________________________________________________
Identify the corporate servicer a s the company If the authorized agent is a servicer.
A ddress
c/o Marburger Law LLC, 14650 Detroit Avenue, Suite 450______________

Number
Street
Cleveland____________________________OH
City
Contact phone
Official Form 410
State
216 930 0500_________________
Proof of Claim
44107____________
ZIP Code
Emaildavid@marburaer-law.com
page 3
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 185 of 212
Attach Supporting Documentation

have supporting documentation.
(attach below)
Main Document
(limited to a single PDF attachment that is less than 5 megabytes in size and under 100 pages):
I do not have supporting documentation.
PLEASE REVIEW YOUR PROOF OF CLAIM AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS AND REDACT
ACCORDINGLY PRIOR TO UPLOADING THEM. PROOFS OF CLAIM AND ATTACHMENTS ARE
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS THAT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR ANYONE TO VIEW ONLINE.
IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING REDACTING YOUR PROOF OF CLAIM AND SUPPORTING

DOCUMENTATION When you submit a proof of claim and any supporting documentation you must show
only the last four digits of any social-security, individuals tax-identification, or financial-account number, only
the initials of a minors name, and only the year of any persons date of birth. If the claim is based on the delivery
of health care goods or services, limit the disclosure of the goods or services so as to avoid embarrassment or the
disclosure of confidential health care information.
A document has been redacted when the person filing it has masked, edited out, or otherwise deleted, certain
information. The responsibility for redacting personal data identifiers (as defined in Federal Rule of Bankruptcy
Procedure 9037) rests solely with the party submitting the documentation and their counsel. Prime Clerk and the
Clerk of the Court will not review any document for redaction or compliance with this Rule and you hereby
release and agree to hold harmless Prime Clerk and the Clerk of the Court from the disclosure of any personal
data identifiers included in your submission. In the event Prime Clerk or the Clerk of the Court discover that
personal identifier data or information concerning a minor individual has been included in a pleading. Prime
Clerk and the Clerk of the Court are authorized, in their sole discretion, to redact all such information from the
text of the filing and make an entry indicating the correction.
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 186 of 212
Main Document
Official Form 410
Instructions fo r Proof o f Claim ______________________________

United States Bankruptcy Court
12/15
These instructions and definitions generally explain the law. In certain circumstances, such as bankruptcy cases that debtors
do not file voluntarily, exceptions to these general rules may apply. You should consider obtaining the advice of an attorney,
especially if you are unfamiliar with the bankruptcy process and privacy regulations.
A person who files a fraudulent claim could be fined up
to $500,000, imprisoned for up to 5 years, or both.
18 U.S.C. $ 152, 157 and 3571.
How to fill o u t th is form

Fill In all of the information about the claim as of the
date the case was filed.
b A Proof o f Claim form and any attached documents

must show only the last 4 digits of any social security
number, individuals tax identification number, or
financial account number, and only the year of any
persons date of birth. See Bankruptcy Rule 9037.
Fill in the caption at the top of the form.

8 If the claim has been acquired from someone else,
then state the identity of the last party who owned the
claim or was the holder of the claim and who transferred
it to you before the initial claim was filed.
Attach any supporting documents to this form.
Attach redacted copies o f any documents that show thatthe
debt exists, a lien secures the debt, or both. (See the
definition of redaction on the next page.)
Also attach redacted copies of any documents that show
perfection o f any security interest or any assignments or
transfers of the debt. In addition to the documents, a
summary may be added. Federal Rule of Bankruptcy
Procedure (called Bankruptcy Rule) 3001(c) and(d).
x For a minor child, fill in only the childs initials and the
full name and address of the childs parent or
guardian. For example, write A.B., a minor child (John
Doe, parent, 123 Main St., City, State). See Bankruptcy
Rule 9037.
C onfirm ation th a t th e claim h a s b e e n filed

To receive confirmation that the claim has been filed, enclose a
stamped self-addressed envelope and a copy of this form. You
may view a list o f filed claims in this case by visiting the
Claims and Noticing Agent's website at
http://cases.primeclerk.com/gawker.
U n d e rsta n d th e te rm s u s e d in th is form
s Do not attach original documents because
attachments may be destroyed after scanning.
s
If the claim is based on delivering health care goods

or services, do not disclose confidential health care
information. Leave out or redact confidential
information both in the claim and in the attached
documents.
Administrative expense: Generally, an expense that arises

after a bankruptcy case is filed in connection with operating,
liquidating, or distributing the bankruptcy estate.
11 U.S.C. 503.
Claim: A creditors right to receive payment for a debt that
the debtor owed on the date the debtor filed for bankruptcy.
11 U.S.C. 101 (5). A claim may be secured or unsecured.
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 187 of 212
Claim Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 503(b)(9): A claim arising

from the value of any goods received by the Debtor within
20 days before the date of commencement of the above case,
in which the goods have been sold to the Debtor in the
ordinary course of the Debtor's business. Attach
documentation supporting such claim.
Creditor: A person, corporation, or other entity to whom a
debtor owes a debt that was incurred on or before the datethe
debtor filed for bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C. 101 (10).
Debtor: A person, corporation, or other entity who is in
bankruptcy. Use the debtors name and case number asshown
in the bankruptcy notice you received. 11 U.S.C. 101 (13).
Evidence of perfection: Evidence of perfection of asecurity
interest may include documents showing that a security
interest has been filed or recorded, such as a mortgage, lien,
certificate of title, or financing statement.
Information that is entitled to privacy: A P roof o f Claim
form and any attached documents must show only the last 4
digits of any social security number, an individuals tax
identification number, or a financial account number, only the
initials of a minors name, and only the year of any persons
date of birth. If a claim is based on delivering healthcare
goods or services, limit the disclosure of the goods or services
to avoid embarrassment or disclosure of confidential health
care information. You may later be required to give more
information if the trustee or someone else in interest objectsto
the claim.
Priority claim: A claim within a category of unsecured
claims that is entitled to priority under 11 U.S.C. 507(a).
These claims are paid from the available money or
property in a bankruptcy case before other unsecured
claims are paid. Common priority unsecured claims
include alimony, child support, taxes, and certain unpaid
wages.
Proof of claim: A form that shows the amount of debt the
debtor owed to a creditor on the date of the bankruptcy filing.
The form must be filed in the district where the case is
pending.
Redaction of information: Masking, editing out, or deleting
certain information to protect privacy. Filers must redactor
leave out information entitled to privacy on the P roof o f
Claim form and any attached documents.
Main Document
Secured claim under 11 U.S.C. 506(a): A claim backed by

a lien on particular property of the debtor. A claim is secured
to the extent that a creditor has the right to be paid from the
property before other creditors are paid. The amount o f a
secured claim usually cannot be more than the value o f the
particular property on which the creditor has a lien. Any
amount owed to a creditor that is more than the value o f the
property normally may be an unsecured claim. But exceptions
exist; for example, see 11 U.S.C. 1322(b) and the final
sentence of 1325(a).
Examples of liens on property include a mortgage on real
estate or a security interest in a car. A lien may be voluntarily
granted by a debtor or may be obtained through a court
proceeding. In some states, a court judgment may be a lien.
Setoff: Occurs when a creditor pays itself with money
belonging to the debtor that it is holding, or by canceling a
debt it owes to the debtor.
Unsecured claim: A claim that does not meet the
requirements of a secured claim. A claim may be unsecured in
part to the extent that the amount o f the claim is more than the
value o f the property on which a creditor has a lien.
O ffers to p u rc h a s e a claim
Certain entities purchase claims for an amount that is less than
the face value of the claims. These entities may contact
creditors offering to purchase their claims. Some written
communications from these entities may easily be confused
with official court documentation or communications from the
debtor. These entities do not represent the bankruptcy court,
the bankruptcy trustee, or the debtor. A creditor has no
obligation to sell its claim. However, if a creditor decides to
sell its claim, any transfer of that claim is subjectto
Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e), any provisions of the Bankruptcy
Code (11 U.S.C. 101 et seq.) that apply, and any orders of
the bankruptcy court that apply.
P le a se s e n d co m p le te d P roof(s) o f Claim to :
Gawker Media, LLC Claims Processing Center
c/o Prime Clerk LLC
830 3rd Avenue, 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10022
Do not file these instructions with your form j
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 188 of 212
Main Document
United States Bankruptcy Court

Southern District of New York
(
(
(
(
(
In re
G aw k er M edia, LLC, e t
ah,
C h a p te r ti
Case No. 16-11700 (SMB)
(Jo in tly A d m in iste re d )
(
D e b to rs .
(
(
S u p p le m e n t to A.J. D a u le rio 's p ro o fs o f

claim
(
(
(
B ack g ro u n d
1
This Supplement accompanies and is incorporated within each of the
three separate proofs of claim that A.J. Daulerio is filing: one against debtor Gawker
Media, LLC and one against each of two affiliated debtors, Gawker Media Group, Inc.
and Kinja Kft in their Chapter 11 bankruptcy matters. The information in this
Supplement and in the proof of claim form itself comes from various records and
information assembled on Mr. Daulerio's behalf by his counsel, David Marburger, who
prepared this Supplement for Mr. Daulerio.
A.
The last four digits of the taxpayer identification number of
Gawker Media LLC are
0492
. Its mailing address is: c/o Opportune LLP, Attn:
William D. Holden, Chief Restructuring Officer,

NY 1 0 0 2 0 .
10
East
53
rd St., 3 3 rd Floor, New York,
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
B.
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 189 of 212
Main Document
The last four digits of the taxpayer identification number of
Gawker Media Group, Inc. are 3 2 3 1 . Its mailing address is the same as Gawker Media
LLC's mailing address.
C.
Kft are
5056
The last four digits of the taxpayer identification number of Kinja
. Its mailing address is the same as Gawker Media LLC's mailing address.
On June
10 201 6
, debtor Gawker Media LLC filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of Title
11
of the United States Code in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Gawker Media LLC's
bankruptcy is pending under Bankruptcy Case No. 16-11700.
On June
12 2 0 1 6
, affiliated debtor Gawker Media Group, Inc. filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code in
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Affiliated
debtor Gawker Media Group, Inc.'s bankruptcy is pending under Bankruptcy C ase No.
16-11719.
Also on June
12 2 0 1 6
, affiliated debtor Kinja Kft filed a voluntary petition
for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Affiliated debtor Kinja Kft's
bankruptcy is pending under Bankruptcy Case No. 16-11718.
SDNY bankruptcy of Gawker Media LLC\Supplement to A.J. Daulerio proofs of claim.docx
Page 2 of 13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 190 of 212
Main Document
This proof of claim asserts an ongoing duty to provide a legal defense to
claimant A.J. Daulerio in recent, continuing, and expected legal proceedings and
litigation.
This proof of claim also asserts certain rights of Daulerio of indemnity
against Gawlcer Media, LLC and/or the affiliated debtors.

J u d g m e n t a g a in s t c la im a n t D aulerio a n d G a w k e r M edia, LLC
in
7
Bollea v. Gawker Media, LLC, et al.
Claimant A.J. Daulerio is one of three defendants named in a final
judgment entered on June 8 , 2 0 1 6 , in the civil suit of Terry Bollea v. Gawker Media,
LLC, et al, Circuit Ct of the Sixth Judicial Circuit for Pinellas County, Fla., Case No. 1 2 012447
CI-0 1 1 .
In his suit, Bollea accused Daulerio of posting a video of Bollea on the
website Gawker.com with the knowledge and authority of Gawker Media, LLC. Bollea
claimed that posting the video invaded Bollea's privacy and committed other civil
wrongs. At the timeOctober,
2012
2012
Daulerio was Editor-in-Chief of Gawker.com.
Gawker Media, LLC, published Gawker.com and its content. In October,
, Gawker Media, LLC owned a subsidiary Gawker Entertainment, LLCwhich
employed Daulerio and others to create the content shown on Gawker.com. A copy of
Daulerio's employment contract with Gawker Entertainment, LLC accompanies this
Supplement as E xhibit 8.
Page 3 of 13
16-11700-smb
io.
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 191 of 212
In December,
2012
Main Document
, Gawlcer Media, LLC restructured how it operated. It
assumed the rights and liabilities of Gawker Entertainment, LLC and other
subsidiaries. Gawker Media, LLC assumed Gawker Entertainment, LLC's employment
relationships. One of those employment relationships was the employment of
Daulerio. Gawker Media, LLC assumed the rights and duties expressed in Daulerio's
employment contract with Gawker Entertainment, LLC. See Gawker Media LLC's
verified responses to interrogatories, a copy of which accompanies this Supplement as
Exhibit 6 .
11
Daulerio left the employ of Gawker Media, LLC in January,
Entertainment, LLC dissolved in February,
12
2013
2013
. Gawker
The final judgment of June 8 , 2 0 1 6 , in the Bollea suit adjudges that Bollea
shall recover jointly and severally the sum of $115 million in compensatory damages at
an annual interest rate of 4 .7 8 % from Daulerio, Gawker Media, LLC, and Nicholas
Denton (founder and CEO of Gawker Media, LLC). It also adjudges that Bollea shall
recover $1 0 0 , 0 0 in punitive damages from Daulerio at the same interest rate. A copy of
the judgment accompanies this Supplement as Exhibit 2.
13
Daulerio and the other two defendants have appealed that final
judgment to the Florida Second District Court of Appeal, where that appeal is
pending. Proceedings there are stayed because of Gawker Media, LLC's bankruptcy
Page 4 of 13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 192 of 212
Main Document
proceedings in this Court. A copy of the notice of appeal accompanies this

14
Holding Gawker Media, LLC liable for the acts of Daulerio means that
the trial court in the Bollea case adjudged Daulerio's acts to have been within the
scope of his employment.
B o llea's e x e c u tio n o f th e ju d g m e n t a g a in s t c la im a n t D aulerio
15
Gawker Media, LLC's bankruptcy proceedings in this Court have effected
an automatic stay of further proceedings in the Florida trial court in the Bollea case as
to Gawker Media, LLC. One of the other three defendants, Nick Denton, also has
petitioned for bankruptcy, resulting in the same kind of stay of proceedings against
Denton.
16
Daulerio has not petitioned for relief in any bankruptcy court. The
Florida trial court has not stayed proceedings in aid of Bollea executing the $u 5 .i
million judgment against Daulerio. Such proceedings have been and continue to be
underway.
17
On August 1 7 , 2 0 1 6 , the Florida trial court issued an order finding that
Daulerio possessed certain property or assets which may be used to satisfy all or part
of the final judgment. The court decided that Daulerio owned legal rights "arising
from a policy and practice" of Gawker Media, LLC and its parent, affiliated debtor
Page 5 of 13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 193 of 212
Main Document
Gawker Media Group, Inc., under which "the companies agreed to defend against and
pay all of the Final Judgment entered against Mr. Daulerio." A copy of that order
accompanies this Supplement as Exhibit 4 . See paragraph 7 d of the order.
18
The same order of August 1 7 , 2 0 1 6 , "hereby transferred and assigned to
Mr. Bollea" the rights of Daulerio to have Gawker Media, LLC and Gawker Media
Group, Inc. "pay part or all of the Final Judgment." It added: "Mr. Bollea is hereby
deemed to be the owner of the rights, with full power and authority to seek to enforce
said rights" against Gawker Media, LLC and Gawker Media Group, Inc., subject to the
bankruptcy stay. The order also added that "any payments" received by enforcing the
transferred rights "shall be applied toward satisfaction of the Final Judgment."
19
Daulerio has appealed the order of August 1 7 , 2 0 1 6 , to the Florida Second
District Court of Appeal. His appeal remains pending. A copy of his notice of appeal
accompanies this Supplement as Exhibit 5 .
20
Toward satisfying the judgment, Bollea has served a writ of garnishment
approved by the Florida trial court upon Chase Bank covering all of the money in
Daulerio's personal bank account (about $1,5 0 0 ).
21
As Daulerio acquires assets in the future, he expects Bollea to undertake
further proceedings to seize those assets toward satisfaction of the $115.1 million
Page 6 of 13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 194 of 212
Main Document
judgment. That may require Daulerio to engage counsel licensed to practice law in
California who has experience with creditors' and debtors' rights under California law.
22
Since the Bollea suit's inception through the filing of Gawker Media
LLC's bankruptcy petition, Gawker Media, LLC and/or one of the affiliated debtors
supplied Daulerio with a defense by paying for the services of the law firm Levine
Sullivan Koch & Schulz LLP and the law firm of Thomas & LoCicero to represent
Daulerio.
23
Since the filing of Gawker Media, LLC's bankruptcy petition, the Levine
Sullivan firm and the Thomas firm have provided legal services for Daulerio. The fees
for the services performed by the Levine Sullivan firm between the time of filing the
bankruptcy petition through late September,
Levine Sullivan firm dated September
28
2016
, are about $1 9 0 ,0 0 0 . See letter from
, 2 0 1 6 , a copy of which accompanies this
24
Daulerio expects the Levine Sullivan and Thomas law firms to continue
to render services to defend him in the Bollea litigation after September,
2016
, such as
by continuing him and the other two defendants in their appeals of the final
judgment. Daulerio does not know yet the amount of the fees that would be incurred
for those future services by those firms.
Page 7 of 13
16-11700-smb
25
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 195 of 212
Main Document
Because a conflict of interest prevents the Levine Sullivan and Thomas
firms from counseling Daulerio about whatever rights he has against Gawlcer Media,
LLC and the affiliated debtors for indemnity and a continued defenseand in
asserting any such rights on Daulerio's behalfthose firms have not provided those
kinds legal services to Daulerio.
26
So in September,
2016
, Daulerio retained the law firm of Marburger Law
LLC to provide legal services to him arising from the Bollea litigation that the other
firms cannot provide, and to provide legal services to him arising from the Bollea
litigation where it seems prudent for Daulerio to have Marburger Law LLC providing
services only for him instead of the same counsel simultaneously representing him,
Gawker Media, LLC and the affiliated debtors. The fees for the services of Marburger
Law LLC will be about $2 0 , 0 0 0 for the month of September,
2016
. See letter from
Marburger Law LLC, dated September 2 9 , 2 0 1 6 , a copy of which accompanies this

27
Services from Marburger Law LLC will continue after September,
2016
, in
defending Daulerio in matters arising from the Bollea suit. Daulerio does not know yet
the amount of the fees that he will incur from Marburger Law LLC for those future
services. Those services will include at least prosecuting Daulerio's appeal of the trial
court's order of August 1 7 , 2 0 1 6 , transferring his indemnity rights and other property
Page 8 of 13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 196 of 212
Main Document
to Bollea (Exhibit 8 ) and representing Daulerio at a hearing before the trial court in
the Bollea suit set for late October,
2016
W h a t D aulerio s e e k s in th is p r o o f o f claim
28
D uty to d e fe n d .
Daulerio asserts that the debtor Gawker Media, LLC
and/or the affiliated debtors owe to him a continuing duty to provide all of the
following, beginning on June
10 201 6
, and continuing into the future:
legal services and related expenses in defending Daulerio in

the Bollea suit through all stages of the litigation in all
courts, arbitrations, mediations, agencies, and other
tribunals;
legal services and related expenses in defending

proceedings before any court, tribunal, arbiter, mediator,
official, or agency that arise from Bollea's attempts to
satisfy the trial court's judgment of June 8 , 2 0 1 6 ; or to
satisfy a judgment rendered on any new trial or remittitur;
or to satisfy any other judgment or order entered in the
Bollea suit against Daulerio;
legal services and related expenses in asserting and

defending Daulerio's proofs of claim before this Court
against debtor Gawker Media, LLC and the affiliated
debtors Gawker Media Group, Inc. and Kinja Kft;
legal services and related expenses in settling, or in

attempts to settle, Daulerio's duty to satisfy any judgment,
order, claim, demand, decision, or award against Daulerio
arising out of the Bollea litigation;
SDNY bankruptcy of Gawker Media LLCVSupplement to A.J. Daulerio proofs of claim.docx
Page 9 of 13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 197 of 212
Main Document
all other legal services and related expenses necessary or

beneficial to protect Daulerio's legal interests as affected or
potentially affected by the Bollea litigation and by any and
every claim, demand, and proceeding arising from that
litigation;
payment to the Levine Sullivan and Thomas law firms for

services rendered in representing Daulerio in the Bollea suit
since June 1 0 , 2 0 1 6 , and related expenses;
29
payment to Marburger Law LLC for services rendered in

preparing this proof of claim and for all other services
rendered in representing Daulerio in matters arising from
the Bollea litigation, and related expenses.
D uty to in d e m n ify re Bollea Ju d g m e n t.
This proof of claim seeks from
debtor Gawker Media, LLC and/or the affiliated debtors the full amount of all money
seized by Bollea toward satisfying the Florida trial court's June 8 , 2 0 1 6 , judgment
(E xhibit 2)
and the full value of all other property of Daulerio seized by or on behalf of
Bollea as of September 2 9 , 2 0 1 6 , and in the future toward satisfying the judgment plus
all associated costs and expenses paid by or demanded from Daulerio, the total
amount of which is not known yet. Among such property is the value of Daulerio's
shares in affiliated debtor Gawker Media Group, Inc., which Daulerio transferred to
Bollea under the trial court's order of August 1 7 , 2 0 x6 (E xhibit 4) and all amounts
seized by Bollea from Daulerio's bank account or seized by Bollea by writ of
garnishment or attachment (or some functionally equivalent instrument of the law) of
Page 10 of 13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 198 of 212
Main Document
compensation earned by Daulerio as an employee or independent contractor. The

total value and amount of such money and property is not known yet.
30
D uty to in d e m n ify re f u tu r e o r d e r s , ju d g m e n ts .
This proof of claim also
seeks from debtor Gawker Media, LLC and/or the affiliated debtors the full amount
that Daulerio pays, or that a court orders him to pay, or that any person demands
from him to pay to satisfy any and every future order or judgment, if any, entered
against him by any court in the Bollea litigation, or to satisfy any and every future
order, judgment, decision, or award against Daulerio imposed by any other court,
tribunal, arbiter, official, or agency in any proceeding arising from the Bollea
litigation. This includes associated costs and expenses incurred by Daulerio. The total
amount is not known yet.
31.
D uty t o in d e m n ify
re f u tu r e s e ttle m e n ts . This proof of claim also seeks
from debtor Gawker Media, LLC and/or the affiliated debtors the full value and
amount of all money or other property that Daulerio pays or transfers to settle his
duty to satisfy any and every judgment, order, claim, demand, decision, litigation, or
award against him arising in and arising from the Bollea litigation. This includes the
full value and amount of all money or other property that Daulerio has not paid or
transferred, but is obligated to pay or transfer, to settle such a dutyto the extent
that the person to which he is obligated (or that person's assignee) makes a demand
Page 11 of 13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 199 of 212
Main Document
for the payment or transfer. The total amount or value of such payment or transfer is
not known yet.
32
A m o u n t o f claim liste d o n F orm 410.
listed on Form 4 1 0 , line
The amount of Daulerio's claim
is $ 6 million. The $ 6 million amount is an estimate only,
based on legal fees incurred as of September,
2016
, potential future legal fees, amounts
and valu of Daulerio's property seized by (and transferred to) Bollea as of September
29
, 2 0 1 6 , and potential future seizures by or on behalf of Bollea.
T he s o u rc e s o f th e o b lig a tio n to d e fe n d a n d in d e m n ify D aulerio

33
The sources of Gawker Media LLC's and/or the affiliated debtors' duty to
defend Daulerio and to indemnify him arise from at least each of three independent
sources:
i.
his employment contract with Gawker Entertainment, LLC

(E xhibit 8), which Gawker Media, LLC and/or the affiliated
debtors Gawker Media Group, Inc. and Kinja Kft assumed;
ii.
the general company practice and policy of Gawker Media,

LLC and/or the affiliated debtors Gawker Media Group,
Inc. and Kinja Kft (see declaration of William Holden, chief
restructuring officer *]s 1 9 , 2 4 , a copy of which accompanies
this Supplement as E xhibit 7), and Gawker Media, LLC's
established course of providing a defense to Daulerio since
the inception of the Bollea suit;
iii.
the law of the State of New York.
Page 12 of 13
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 200 of 212
Main Document
D au lerio 's re s e rv a tio n s o f rig h ts

34
Daulerio reserves the right to amend and further supplement his proof
of claim against debtor Gawker Media, LLC and/or the affiliated debtors Gawker
Media Group. Inc. and Kinja Kit.
35
Daulerio reserves the right to file additional proofs of claim for
additional claims or for higher priorities and to use any setoff rights that he may have
against additional claims.
36
Daulerio further reserves all rights accruing to him.
37
The filing of this Proof of Claim is not intended to be, and shall not be,
construed as any of the following: (x) an election of remedy; (2 ) a waiver of any past,
present, or future defaults or events of default; (3 ) a waiver or limitation of any of his
rights; (4 ) a waiver of any theories of recovery; (5 ) a waiver as to any other claims; (6 )
an admission that any or all of the claims in his proofs of claim are not entitled to be
treated as expenses of administration; (7 ) a consent to the determination of the
debtor's or affiliated debtors' liabilities to Daulerio by this Bankruptcy Court or by any
other court; (8 ) a consent to the jurisdiction or venue of this Bankruptcy Court or any
other court.
- o -
Page 13 of 13
Doc10/06/2016
493 Filed03:36:17
11/28/16 PM
Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12
47350835 E-Filed
Pg 201 of 212
Main Document
EXHIBIT C
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 202 of 212
Main Document
LEVINE SULLIVAN
KOCH & SCHULZ, LLP
1899 L Street, NW
Suite 200
(202) 508-1100 | Phone
(202) 861-9888 | Fax
Seth D. Berlin
(202) 508-1122
sberlin@lskslaw.com
September 28, 2016

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
David Marburger, Esq.
Marburger Law, LLC
14650 Detroit Ave
Suite 450
Lakewood, OH 44107
Re:
A.J. Daulerios Legal Fees
Dear Mr. Marburger:

As you know, along with local counsel, this firm represents A.J. Daulerio in connection
with the proceeding captioned Terry Gene Bollea v. Gawker Media, LLC, et al., No.
12012447CI-011, currently pending in the Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit in and for
Pinellas County, Florida, as well as in various appellate proceedings arising out of that
proceeding (collectively, the Bollea Proceedings).
As you requested, I am writing to advise you that LSKSs outstanding fees and costs for
representing Mr. Daulerio in the Bollea Proceedings are approximately $190,000. This figure
covers the period between June 10, 2016 (when Mr. Daulerios co-defendant Gawker Media,
LLC filed for bankruptcy) and August 31, 2016, and includes fees incurred representing Mr.
Daulerio individually and his share of fees incurred in connection with our joint representation of
all three defendants in the Bollea Proceedings. It does not include any fees or costs for work
performed this month or any fees or costs that might be incurred going forward.
Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
LEVINE SULLIVAN KOCH & SCHULZ, LLP
Washington
N e w York
Philadelphia
D enver
Doc10/06/2016
493 Filed03:36:17
11/28/16 PM
Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12
47350835 E-Filed
Main Document
Pg 203 of 212
EXHIBIT D
* * *ELECTRONICALLY FILED 10/06/2016 03:36:16 PM: ICEN BURKE, CLERIC OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, PINELLAS COUNTY***
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 204 of 212
Main Document
MARBURGERLAW
September
29
, 2016
A,J. Daulerio
via email: adaulerio@gmail.com
Re: Services arising from Bolleo, litigation
Dear Mr. Daulerio:
This confirms that Marburger Law LLC has provided services and incurred expenses
on your behalf during September, 2 0 1 6 , arising from the Bolleo litigation.
Among those services: preparing proofs of claim to be filed in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York; assessing and planning to
protect your legal interests in the Bolleo litigation where such services have not been,
or cannot be, provided by the law firms of Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP and
Thomas and LoCicero.
I estim ate th a t M a rb u rg e r Law LLCs legal Fees an d related ex p en ses for th e m o n th of
September, 2 0 1 6 will be about $2 0 ,0 0 0 .
Very truly yours,
<C-S
David Marburger
14650 D etroit Ave., Suite 450
Cleveland, O H 44107
office
316.9 3 0 .0 5 0 0
mobile 216,577.8754
david@marburger--iaw.com
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 205 of 212
EXHIBIT E
GMGI Board Resolution
Main Document
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 206 of 212
Main Document
Annex A
RESOLUTIONS OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF GAWKER MEDIA GROUP, INC.
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the Board of Directors) of Gawker Media Group,
Inc. (the Company), a Cayman Islands exempted company, does hereby consent to the taking
of the following actions and does hereby adopt the following resolutions;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has considered presentations by the management of,
and the financial and legal advisors to, the Company regarding the potential liabilities and
liquidity situation of the Company, the strategic alternatives available to it, and the effect of the
foregoing on the Companys business, creditors, and other parties in interest;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has had the opportunity to consult with the
Companys management, and financial and legal advisors and other professionals, and fully
consider each of the strategic alternatives available to the Company; and
WHEREAS, based on its review of all available alternatives and advice provided by such
advisors and professionals, the Board of Directors has determined that it is in the best interest of
the Company, its subsidiaries and their respective stakeholders, for the Company and its
subsidiaries to take the actions specified in the following resolutions:
Chapter 11 Filing
RESOLVED: That in the judgment of the Board of Directors of the Company, it is desirable and
in the best interests of the Company, its creditors, and other parties in interest, that
the Company and its affiliates file or cause to be filed a voluntary petition for
relief (the Chapter 11 Case) under the provisions of chapter 11 of title 11 of the
United States Code (the Bankruptcy Code) in the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York (the Bankruptcy Court).
RESOLVED: That the Company file or cause to be filed the Chapter 11 Case under the
provisions of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court.
RESOLVED: That any officer of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer, the
President or the Chief Restructuring Officer (collectively, the Authorized
Officers) be, and hereby are, authorized to execute and file, or cause to be
executed and filed, on behalf of the Company or any of its affiliates or
subsidiaries, a chapter 11 petition for relief in the Bankruptcy Court.
RESOLVED: That any Authorized Officer of the Company, acting alone or with one or more
other Authorized Officers be, and hereby are, authorized to execute and file on
behalf of the Company all schedules, lists and other papers or documents, and to
take any and all action which they deem reasonable, advisable, expedient,
56906081_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 207 of 212
Main Document
convenient, necessary or proper to obtain chapter 11 relief, including, without

limitation, any action necessary to maintain the ordinary course operation of the
Companys business.
RESOLVED: That in order to minimize disruption during the pendency of the Chapter 11 cases,
it is in the best interests of the Company to amend the Operating Agreement of
Gawker Media LLC in accordance with that certain Amendment No. 3 to the
Operating Agreement of Gawker Media LLC, dated on or about the date hereof,
to allow a person not to be disqualified as Member (as defined therein) of Gawker
Media LLC due to the bankruptcy- or insolvency-related circumstances
enumerated therein.
RESOLVED: That in order to minimize disruption during the pendency of the Chapter 11 cases,
the Operating Agreement of Gawker Media LLC be amended in accordance with
that certain Amendment No. 3 to the Operating Agreement of Gawker Media
LLC, dated on or about the date hereof, to allow a person not to be disqualified as
Member of Gawker Media LLC due to the bankruptcy- or insolvency-related
circumstances enumerated therein.
Retention of Professionals
RESOLVED: That the Authorized Officers be, and they hereby are, and each of them acting
singly is, authorized to employ the law firm of Ropes & Gray LLP as bankruptcy
counsel to represent and assist the Company in carrying out its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code, and to take any and all actions to advance the Companys
rights and obligations, including filing any pleadings; and in connection
therewith, the Authorized Officers be, and they are, and each of them acting
singly is, authorized to execute appropriate retention agreements, pay appropriate
retainers prior to and immediately upon filing of the Chapter 11 Case, and cause
to be filed an appropriate application for authority to retain the services of Ropes
& Gray LLP.
singly is, authorized to employ and retain the firm of Opportune LLP (including
for William Holden of Opportune to serve as the Companys CRO), to provide
management services, in accordance with the terms of an engagement agreement
between the Company and Opportune, LLP (the Opportune Services
Agreement), to represent and assist the Company in carrying out its duties under
the Bankruptcy Code and to take any and all actions to advance the Companys
rights and obligations; and in connection therewith, the Authorized Officers be,
and they are, and each of them acting singly is, authorized to negotiate the final
terms of the Opportune Services Agreement, execute the Services Agreement, and
cause to be filed an appropriate application for authority to retain the services of
Opportune LLP.
56906081_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 208 of 212
Main Document
singly is, authorized to employ and retain the firm of Houlihan Lokey Capital,
Inc. (Houlihan Lokey), as investment banker in accordance with the terms of an
engagement agreement between the Company and Houlihan Lokey (the HL
Services Agreement) to represent and assist the Company in carrying out its
duties under the Bankruptcy Code, and to take any and all actions to advance the
Companys rights and obligations; and in connection therewith, the Authorized
Officers be, and they are, and each of them acting singly is, authorized to
negotiate the final terms of the HL Services Agreement, execute the HL Services
Agreement, and cause to be filed an appropriate application for authority to retain
the services of Houlihan Lokey.
singly is, authorized to employ and retain the firm of Prime Clerk LLC as notice,
claims, and balloting agent and as administrative advisor to represent and assist
the Company in carrying out its duties under the Bankruptcy Code, and to take
any and all actions to advance the Companys rights and obligations; and in
connection therewith, the Authorized Officers be, and they are, and each of them
acting singly is, authorized to negotiate the final terms of Prime Clerk LLCs
retention, execute appropriate retention agreements, and cause to be filed an
appropriate application for authority to retain the services of Prime Clerk LLC.
singly is, authorized to employ any other professionals to assist the Company in
carrying out its duties under the Bankruptcy Code; and in connection therewith,
each of the Authorized Officers, with power of delegation, is hereby authorized
and directed to execute appropriate retention agreements, pay appropriate
retainers, and to cause to be filed an appropriate application for authority to retain
the services of any other professionals as necessary.
Cash Collateral & Adequate Protection
RESOLVED: That the Company will obtain benefits from the use of collateral, including cash
collateral, as that term is defined in section 363(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (the
Cash Collateral), which is security for certain prepetition secured lenders
(collectively, the Secured Lenders) party to:
a. The loan and security agreement (as subsequently amended, the First Lien
Credit Agreement) with Silicon Valley Bank (Silicon Valley Bank),
pursuant to which Silicon Valley Bank agreed to provide to Gawker Media
LLC a term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $7,666,666.67
(the First Lien Term Loan) and a letter of credit with an undrawn face
amount of $5,302,066.00 (the First Lien Letter of Credit). The obligations
under the First Lien Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Company and
Kinja Kft. and are secured on a first priority basis by liens on substantially all
of the assets of Gawker Media LLC, Kinja Kft., and the Company.
56906081_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 209 of 212
Main Document
b. The loan and security agreement (the Second Lien Credit Agreement) with
US VC Partners LP (US VC Partners), a Delaware limited partnership,
pursuant to which US VC Partners agreed to extend a term loan facility to the
Company in the initial amount of $15,000,000 (the Second Lien Term
Loan). The obligations under the Second Lien Credit Agreement are
guaranteed by Gawker Media LLC and Kinja Kft. and the Second Lien Debt
is secured by a second priority lien on substantially all of the assets of the
Company, Gawker Media LLC, and Kinja Kft.
RESOLVED: That in order to use and obtain the benefits of the Cash Collateral, and in
accordance with section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Company will provide
certain adequate protection to the Secured Lenders (the Adequate Protection
Obligations), to be documented in a proposed order with terms substantially
similar to those considered by the Board of Directors (the Cash Collateral
Order).
RESOLVED: That the general terms proposed to be included in the Cash Collateral Order to
which the Company will be subject, and the actions and transactions contemplated
thereby be, and hereby are authorized and approved, and each of the Authorized
Officers of the Company be, and hereby is, authorized and empowered, in the
name of and on behalf of the Company, to take such actions and negotiate or
cause to be prepared and negotiated and to execute, deliver, perform and cause the
performance of, the terms proposed to be included in the Cash Collateral Order,
and such other agreements, certificates, instruments, receipts, petitions, motions
or other papers or documents to which the Company is or will be a party, incur
and pay or cause to be paid all fees and expenses and engage such persons, with
such changes, additions and modifications thereto as the officers of the Company
executing the same shall approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by
such officers execution and delivery thereof.
RESOLVED: That the Company, as debtor and debtor in possession under the Bankruptcy Code
be, and hereby is, authorized to incur the Adequate Protection Obligations and to
undertake any and all related transactions, and that that the Authorized Officers
be, and they hereby are, authorized and directed, and each of them acting alone
hereby is, authorized, directed, and empowered in the name of, and on behalf of,
the Company, as debtor and debtor in possession, to take such actions as in their
discretion is determined to be necessary, desirable, or appropriate to secure and
maintain use of the Cash Collateral.
RESOLVED: That each of the Authorized Officers of the Company be, and hereby is,
authorized, directed and empowered in the name of, and on behalf of, the
Company to file or to authorize the filing of any Uniform Commercial Code (the
UCC) financing statements, any other equivalent filings, any intellectual
property filings and recordation and any necessary assignments for security or
other documents in the name of the Company that are deemed necessary or
appropriate to perfect any lien or security interest granted under the Cash
Collateral Order, including any such UCC financing statement containing a
56906081_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 210 of 212
Main Document
generic description of collateral, such as all assets, all property now or

hereafter acquired and other similar descriptions of like import, and to execute
and deliver, and to record or authorize the recording of, such mortgages and deeds
of trust in respect of real property of the Company and such other filings in
respect of intellectual and other property of the Company, in each case as the
Agents may reasonably request to perfect the security interests of the Agents
under the Cash Collateral Order.
RESOLVED: That each of the Authorized Officers of the Company be, and they hereby are,
authorized, directed and empowered in the name of, and on behalf of, the
Company to take all such further actions, including, without limitation, to pay or
approve the payment of all fees and expenses payable in connection with the
Adequate Protection Obligations and all fees and expenses incurred by or on
behalf of the Company in connection with the foregoing resolutions, which shall
in their sole judgment be necessary, proper or advisable to perform the
Companys obligations under or in connection with the Cash Collateral Order or
any of the other adequate protection documents and the transactions contemplated
therein and to carry out fully the intent of the foregoing resolutions.
Debtor-In-Possession Financing
RESOLVED: That the Company would obtain benefits from debtor-in-possession financing
(DIP Financing) in connection with the chapter 11 case, part of which would be
used to satisfy the Companys and subsidiaries obligations under the First Lien
Credit Agreement, depending on the size of the DIP Financing. Accordingly, (a)
the Board of Directors authorizes and approves (i) the execution, delivery, and
performance of a debtor in possession credit agreement (the Credit Agreement),
in the initial amount of up to $22 million, generally on the terms described to the
Board of Directors (but with any such changes thereto as the Authorized
Officer(s) executing the same shall approve), and any security agreements,
guarantee agreements, other agreements, notes, consents, certificates,
amendments, assignments, and instruments in connection therewith (the Credit
Documents, together with the Credit Agreement, the Financing Documents),
(ii) the granting of a security interest in any assets of the Company as collateral or
the guaranty of the obligations of the debtors under the Credit Agreement, and
(iii) any transactions effected or to be effected pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the Financing Documents; and (b) any Authorized Officer(s) be, and
hereby is, authorized and empowered, in the name and on behalf of the Company,
to negotiate, execute, deliver, and perform or cause the performance of the
Financing Documents, as such Authorized Officer executing the same considers
necessary, appropriate, proper, or desirable to effectuate the transactions
contemplated by the Financing Documents and other financing arrangements
necessary, appropriate, proper, or desirable in the interest of the Company in
connection with the chapter 11 case, such determination to be conclusively
evidenced by such execution or taking of such action.
Sale of Assets and Indemnification
56906081_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 211 of 212
Main Document
RESOLVED: That each of the Authorized Officers shall be, and hereby are, authorized to
commence the process of marketing and selling the assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries outside of a chapter 11 filing and/or in a process approved by the
Bankruptcy Court after a chapter 11 filing. Furthermore, each of the Authorized
Officers shall be, and hereby are, authorized to enter into an asset purchase
agreement to sell the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries (the Sale),
which Sale may be subject to potential higher or better offers in a chapter 11
proceeding. Each of the Authorized Officers are authorized to adjust the terms of
the Sale as necessary, including with respect to price and the particular assets to
be sold.
RESOLVED: That the Company would obtain benefits in connection with the chapter 11 case
from indemnifying writers and editors who are named as defendants in civil
actions, in connection with their work for the Company (each a CompanyRelated Action), in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries are also named
(Employee Defendants). Accordingly, the Board of Directors authorizes any
Authorized Officer to take any actions necessary, appropriate, proper, or desirable
in the interest of the Company in connection with the chapter 11 case, such
determination to be conclusively evidenced by such execution or taking of such
action, to indemnify any Employee Defendant up to the full amount of their costs
and expenses in connection with any Company-Related Action.
General
RESOLVED: That each of the Authorized Officers be, and hereby is, with power of delegation,
authorized, empowered and directed to execute and file all petitions, schedules,
motions, lists, applications, pleadings, and other papers and, in connection
therewith, to employ and retain all assistance by legal counsel, accountants,
financial advisors, and other professionals and to take and perform any and all
further acts and deeds that each of the Authorized Officers deem necessary,
proper, or desirable in connection with the Companys chapter 11 case, with a
view to the successful prosecution of such case.
RESOLVED: That the omission from these resolutions of any agreement, document or other
arrangement contemplated by any of the agreements, documents or instruments
described in the foregoing resolutions or any action to be taken in accordance
with any requirement of any of the agreements, documents or instruments
described in the foregoing resolutions shall in no manner derogate from the
authority of the Authorized Officers to take all actions necessary, desirable,
advisable or appropriate to consummate, effectuate, carry out or further the
transactions contemplated by, and the intent and purposes of, the foregoing
resolutions.
RESOLVED: That all acts, actions, and transactions relating to the matters contemplated by the
foregoing Resolutions previously done, on or prior to the date hereof, in the name
56906081_9
16-11700-smb
Doc 493
Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pg 212 of 212
Main Document
and on behalf of the Company, in connection with the transactions contemplated

by the foregoing resolutions, are in all respects ratified, approved, confirmed and
adopted as acts and deeds by and on behalf of the Company.
RESOLVED: That the Authorized Officers be, and hereby are, and each of them acting singly
is, authorized and directed, on behalf of and in the name of the Company, to enter
into, execute, deliver, certify, file, and/or record and perform such agreements,
instruments, motions, affidavits, applications for approvals or ruling of
governmental or regulatory authorities, certificates, and other documents and to
take such other actions as in the judgment of the Authorized Officer shall be or
become necessary, appropriate, and desirable to prosecute to a successful
completion the Chapter 11 Case and otherwise exercise the rights and powers of
the Company as a member or manager (however denominated, or any officer of
the Company so empowered) of the Companys subsidiary, Gawker Media, LLC,
including any amendments as may be necessary or advisable to the Operating
Agreement of Gawker Media, LLC.
RESOLVED: That each of the Authorized Officers (and their designees and delegates) be and
hereby is authorized and empowered to take all actions or to not take any action in
the name of the Company with respect to the transactions contemplated by these
resolutions hereunder as the sole shareholder, partner, member, or managing
member of each direct subsidiary of the Company, in each case, as such
Authorized Officer shall deem necessary or desirable in such Authorized Officers
reasonable business judgment as may be necessary or convenient to effectuate the
purposes of the transactions contemplated herein.
RESOLVED: That all members of the Board of Directors of the Company have received
sufficient notice of the actions and transactions relating to the matters
contemplated by the foregoing resolutions, as may be required by the
organizational documents of the Company, or hereby waive any right to have
received such notice.
56906081_9

493 Gawker Objection To Daulerio Claims

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

493 Gawker Objection To Daulerio Claims

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

493 Gawker Objection To Daulerio Claims

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose of the document?

What is the purpose of the document?

What is being objected to and why?

What is being objected to and why?

16-11700-smb

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

ROPES & GRAY LLP

NOTICE OF DEBTORS OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO PROOFS OF

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Jeffrey.Oestericher@usdoj.gov; Joseph.Cordaro@usdoj.gov; Carina.Schoenberger@usdoj.gov);

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Dated: November 28, 2016

/s/ Gregg M. Galardi

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

ROPES & GRAY LLP

DEBTORS OMNIBUS OBJECTION TO PROOFS OF

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Daulerios Employment Agreement

Employment Agreement) with Gawker Entertainment, LLC (Gawker Entertainment). In

That Employment Agreement included the following representations and

warranties by Daulerio (collectively, the Employment Representations):

A copy of the Employment Agreement is attached as Exhibit 8 to the Daulerio Claims.

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

That Employment Appendix also contained two separate indemnification

State of New York. Id. 23.

As of January 2013, Daulerio was no longer employed by any of the Debtors or

their affiliates. Supp. 11.

Summary of Relevant Litigation Proceedings

The Bollea I Lawsuit

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Gawker Media provided Daulerio with a defense in the Bollea I Lawsuit by

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

The Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction Order

Subsequent to the commencement of the Debtors chapter 11 cases, Bollea

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

The Supplemental Daulerio Litigation

A copy of the Sanctions Motion is attached as Exhibit C hereto.

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Further, on October 6, 2016, Bollea filed an emergency motion to enforce the

The Debtors Plan And The Bollea Settlement

A copy of the Video Turnover Motion is attached as Exhibit D hereto.

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

The Daulerio Claims

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

and obligations to:

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Pursuant to section 502(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, a filed proof of claim is

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Daulerio Is Not The Owner Of The Indemnification Claims

As discussed in paragraphs 13 and 14 above, the Daulerio Judgment Satisfaction

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e)(1) is therefore squarely on point. It provides that, [i]f

Any Contingent Indemnification Claims Shall Be Disallowed Under Bankruptcy

Specifically, section 502(e)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code provides, in relevant part,

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12

Filed 11/28/16 Entered 11/28/16 22:37:12