1) Several mining corporations were awarded small-scale mining permits by the provincial mining board to extract nickel and cobalt from a mining site.
2) They were found to have exceeded the annual production limit of 150,000 metric tons by the DENR and were issued a cease and desist order.
3) The issue is whether Section 1(1) of PD 1899, which sets the annual production limit of 50,000 metric tons for small-scale mining, was repealed by RA 7076.
4) The Supreme Court held that the production limit was not repealed, as the DENR has the authority to issue regulations on natural resources and had recently reaffirmed the 50,000 metric
1) Several mining corporations were awarded small-scale mining permits by the provincial mining board to extract nickel and cobalt from a mining site.
2) They were found to have exceeded the annual production limit of 150,000 metric tons by the DENR and were issued a cease and desist order.
3) The issue is whether Section 1(1) of PD 1899, which sets the annual production limit of 50,000 metric tons for small-scale mining, was repealed by RA 7076.
4) The Supreme Court held that the production limit was not repealed, as the DENR has the authority to issue regulations on natural resources and had recently reaffirmed the 50,000 metric
1) Several mining corporations were awarded small-scale mining permits by the provincial mining board to extract nickel and cobalt from a mining site.
2) They were found to have exceeded the annual production limit of 150,000 metric tons by the DENR and were issued a cease and desist order.
3) The issue is whether Section 1(1) of PD 1899, which sets the annual production limit of 50,000 metric tons for small-scale mining, was repealed by RA 7076.
4) The Supreme Court held that the production limit was not repealed, as the DENR has the authority to issue regulations on natural resources and had recently reaffirmed the 50,000 metric
1) Several mining corporations were awarded small-scale mining permits by the provincial mining board to extract nickel and cobalt from a mining site.
2) They were found to have exceeded the annual production limit of 150,000 metric tons by the DENR and were issued a cease and desist order.
3) The issue is whether Section 1(1) of PD 1899, which sets the annual production limit of 50,000 metric tons for small-scale mining, was repealed by RA 7076.
4) The Supreme Court held that the production limit was not repealed, as the DENR has the authority to issue regulations on natural resources and had recently reaffirmed the 50,000 metric
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
SR METALS INC V ANGELO REYES
G.R. No. 179669
June 04, 2014 Del Castillo, J. Facts: On March 9, 2006, each of the petitioners was awarded a 2-year Small-Scale Mining Permit (SSMP) by the Provincial Mining Regulatory Board of Agusan del Norte; they were allowed to extract Nickel and Cobalt (Ni-Co) in a 20-hectare mining site in Sitio Bugnang, Brgy. La Fraternidad, Tubay, Agusan del Norte. The EMB sent the mining corporations a Notice of Violation informing them that they had exceeded the allowed annual volume of 150,000 MTs combined production as their stockpile inventory of Nickeliferous ore had already total 177,297 dry metric tons (DMT). This was based on the August 10, 2006 Inspection Report of the MGB Monitoring Team which conducted an inspection after the DENR received complaints of violations of small-scale mining laws and policies by the mining corporations. A technical conference was thereafter held to hear the side of the mining corporations anent their alleged over-extraction. On November 26, 2004, DENR Secretary Angelo T. Reyes issued a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) against the mining corporations suspending their operations for their operations.ChaA few days later or on November 30, 2006, DOJ Secretary Raul M. Gonzalez replied to Governor Amante citing DOJ Opinion No. 74, Series of 2006. By comparing PD 1899 to Republic Act (RA) No. 7076, a subsequent law that likewise defines small-scale mining, the DOJ opined that Section 1 of PD 1899 is deemed to have been impliedly repealed by RA 7076 as nothing from the provisions of the latter law mentions anything pertaining to an annual production quota for smallscale mining. Issue: Whether or not Section 1(1) of PD 1899 that sets the annual production limit of 50,000-MT on small-scale is already repealed by RA 7076? Held: No. Under Section 3(b) of RA 7076, small-scale mining refers to 'mining activities which rely heavily on manual labor using simple implements and methods and do not use explosives or heavy mining equipment. Significantly, this definition does not provide for annual extraction limit unlike in PD 1899. We do not, however, subscribe to the mining corporations averment that the 50,000-MTs production limit does not apply to small-scale miners under RA 7076. Recognizing the DENRs mandate to regulate the countrys natural resources under EO 192, both PD 1899 and RA 7076 delegated to the DENR, thru its Secretary, the power to promulgate the necessary IRRs to give effect to the said laws. Significantly, the DENR in the exercise of such power had just recently resolved the question on the production limit in small-scale mining. On July 5, 2007, it issued DMC 2007-07 or Clarificatory Guidelines in the Implementation of the Small-Scale Mining Laws. By imposing the annual production limit of 50,000 DMT to both SSMPs issued under PD 1899 and Small-Scale Mining Contracts (SSMCs) under RA 7076.