ART1
ART1
ART1
Department of Biostatistics, Gent University, Gent, Belgium, Department of Preclinical Prosthetics, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany and
SUMMARY One hundred and seventy-two fixed reconstructions (317 prosthetic units), made on 283 ITI
implants in 105 patients (age range 2586 years) with
a minimum follow-up period of 40 months, were
taken into the study to analyse technical complication rate, complication type and costs for repair. The
mean evaluation time was 625 253 months.
Eighty were single crowns and 92 different types of
fixed partial dentures (FPDs). In 45 cases the construction was screw retained and in 127 cases
cemented with zinc phosphate cement or an acrylic-based cement. Complications occurred after a
minimum period of 2 months and a maximum
period of 100 months (mean: 359 214 months).
Fifty-five prosthetic interventions were needed on
44 constructions (25%) of which 88% in the molar/
premolar region. The lowest percentage of complications occurred in single crowns (25%), the highest
in 34 unit FPDs (35%) and in FPDs with an exten-
Introduction
Long-term follow-up studies have shown that onestage non-submerged osseointegrated implants used to
replace lost teeth in partially edentulous patients are
very successful (1, 2). Studies show that implants
placed in the maxilla for single-tooth restorations have
a 7-year survival rate of 100% (3). Based on the
analysis of 10 prospective and five retrospective cohort
studies Lang et al. (4) concluded that the cumulative
survival rate of oral implants supporting fixed partial
dentures (FPDs) was 954% after 5 years of function
2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
834
A . L . D E B O E V E R et al.
complications can also lead to additional costs and time
investment during the follow-up years.
Pjetursson et al. (10) stressed in their comprehensive
review that little is known about the type and number
of events of technical complications per time interval as
well as the costs required.
Recently, Attard et al. (11) reported on long-term
costs in 90 edentulous patients treated with mandibular
implant-supported prostheses. They found that maintenance costs for implant-borne fixed reconstructions
were higher than for overdenture prostheses.
The present study describes the prosthetic technical
complications, the possible risk factors involved and the
type and costs of the interventions to repair the
complications of fixed restorations on non-submerged
ITI implants* after an observation period of at least
40 months.
We hypothesized that technical complications were
more frequent in longer FPDs than in single crowns, in
cemented than in screw-retained reconstructions and
that complications were more frequent in patients with
bruxing habits.
350
300
250
Single crown
IMPL/IMPL connected
IMPL/PONTIC/IMPL
IMPL/IMPL/extension
200
IMPL/natural tooth
150
Reconstructions
Units
100
50
Complications
1 Presence or absence of any mechanical complication
with exclusion of loss of composite stop above fixation
screw.
2 type of complications:
(a) incidence of minor intervention (no treatment
needed or less than 10 min chair time, e.g. polishing
chipped-off porcelain)
(b) incidence of moderate intervention (1060 min
of chair time without laboratory costs, e.g. tightening of
loose screw, recementation)
(c) incidence of major intervention (>60 min chair
time and additional laboratory costs, e.g. new crowns,
new abutments)
3 time lapse between fixation and occurrence of
complication
4 intervention type (e.g. recementing, tightening or
replacing screws or abutment, etc.)
5 duration of the necessary intervention
6 laboratory costs in euros (), if any.
Statistical evaluation
Statistical analysis to test the hypothesis of associations
between categorical variables was performed using the
Chi-squared test for contingency tables (Exact test). For
some data the Fischers Exact Test was used. The
MannWhitney U-test was used to compare continuous
variables between two groups. The significance level
was set at a 005.
Results
Twenty-three patients were classified as bruxers
(22%) and 80 non-bruxers (77%). In two patients
bruxing habits were not determined. Forty-three
reconstructions were at risk in the bruxing group
and 126 in the non-bruxing group. The evaluation
time ranged from 40 to 144 months (mean:
0
Type
Fig. 1. Type of reconstructions.
835
836
A . L . D E B O E V E R et al.
Table 1. Distribution of crowns and FPDs: number and percentages (%)
Crowns
FPDs
Upper front
Lower front
Upper premolar
Lower premolar
Upper molar
Lower molar
Total
20 (250)
16 (174)
2 (25)
10 (109)
22 (275)
16 (174)
13 (62)
34 (377)
2 (25)
5 (54)
21 (262)
11 (120)
80
92
80
No complication
60
Complications
Type of reconstruction
No
Single crown
Two-connected crowns
Three-to-four-unit FPD
FPD with extension
Tooth/implants FPD
Total
60
25
21
4
7
117
(513)
(214)
(179)
(34)
(60)
(100)
Yes
20
14
17
4
0
55
(364)
(255)
(309)
(73)
(00)
(100)
40
Total
80
39
38
8
7
172
(465)
(227)
(221)
(47)
(41)
(100)
Table 3. Number and percentages (%) of complications in screwretained and cemented reconstructions
Complications
Type of fixation
Screwed
Harvard
Improv
Total
No
19
56
42
117
(422)
(778)
(764)
(680)
Yes
26
16
13
55
(568)
(222)
(236)
(320)
Total
45
72
55
172
(100)
(100)
(100)
(100)
20
0
Bruxing
No bruxing
Recementing
Screw tightening
New abutment, new crown
Loose + new screws
Loose + new octa abutment
Polishing porcelain
New porcelain
Total restorations
Frequency
20
21
2
1
1
8
2
55
364
382
36
18
18
145
36
1000
Discussion
The incidence of all technical complications on the
prosthetic unit level (17%) and on the construction
level (25%) in the present study is higher than what
has been found in the literature (1416). McDermott
et al. (5) reported over a median duration of follow-up
of 131 months, a complication rate of 14% of which
3% were classified as prosthetic complications. The
incidence of suprastructures-related complications has
been reported at 14% after 5 years (10). In the present
study, screw or abutment loosening amounted to 12%.
The incidence of connection related complications as
screw loosening has been reported at 29% after 5 years
(10). Eckert & Wollan (17) found the probability of
5-year no occurrence of screw loosening at 838%. Loss
of retention was reported at 7% after 5 years and 16%
after 10 years (18, 19). The higher percentage of loss of
retention (20%) in the present study cannot be attributed to the use of a semi-temporary cement
(Improv) which was chosen because of the easy
retrievability if complications occurred. The choice of
an adequate cement providing enough tensile strength
still allowing some retrievability is not easy. In vitro
studies provided controversial results (2022). Mansour
et al. (21) stressed the fact that because of the difference
in material and surface characteristics of metal abutments and natural teeth, results of studies using teeth as
abutments cannot be applied to implant dentistry. They
concluded that at present conclusive data were not
available and that it is at the clinicians discretion to
choose a certain type of cement based on the clinical
situation.
In contrast to other studies implant fracture was not
observed.
Difference was made between minor, major and
moderate complications based on the necessary chair
time and extra laboratory costs to resolve the problem.
Only 145% of the complications could be classified as
major. The larger the construction, the more frequent
complications occurred.
It has been reported that the incidence of technical
complications is higher in combined tooth/implantsupported FPDs (10). This was not found in the present
study but the number of such type of construction is too
limited to draw any conclusion. In the present study,
intrusion of the natural abutment teeth has not been
observed.
In the present study, all reconstructions were single
crowns and FPDs. McDermott et al. (5) reported a
statistically significant difference in prosthetic complication rate between removable reconstructions and
fixed restorations and between anterior versus posterior
location of the FPDs. Payne & Solomons (7) reported a
high rate of prosthetic complications over a 3-year
period in implant-borne removable dentures: fracture
of retention clips (30%), relining of the denture (40%)
and remake of the denture (21%). FPDs have a smaller
complication rate than removable dentures on implants.
Overload because of a faulty occlusal design has often
been mentioned as an important factor in technical
complications and in peri-implant bone loss in implantsupported FPDs (2325). On small FPDs and single
crowns, the occlusion should be designed to minimize
occlusal forces and to maximize force distribution to
adjacent natural teeth (26, 27). In the present study,
great care was taken to the occlusal design and to follow
generally accepted guidelines (12, 13).
Bruxism has often been mentioned a major cause
for implant fracture and technical complications (23,
2830). This is confirmed in the present study with a
significantly higher complication rate in bruxers. This
is also in accordance with the study by Tosun et al.
(31) who, in six patients diagnosed as bruxers by
837
838
A . L . D E B O E V E R et al.
means of a polysomnographic analysis, found more
mechanical and implant fractures than in non-bruxers.
In the present study, the patients were classified as
bruxers based on the presence of occlusal wear facets
and on self-report. It has been shown in the literature
that this is an acceptable method to classify the
patients but can lead to underscoring of the prevalence
of bruxism (32). The difference in the incidence of
complications between the two groups occurs in spite
of the great attention given to the static and dynamic
occlusion of the reconstructions. Also, most reconstructions were single crowns and small FPDs in
partially edentulous patients, where, in most cases
lateral excursions were guided by the natural teeth
(canine function) and not by the implant-borne
crowns or FPDs.
Conclusions
From the present study the following conclusions can
be drawn:
1 during the observation period of, on average
652 months, the incidence of technical complications
was 26% at the construction level and 17% at the
prosthetic unit level
2 only 14% of the complications needed major interventions with additional laboratory cost or extra cost
for spare parts
3 84% of the needed interventions were minimal or
moderate requiring <60 min chair time without additional laboratory cost
4 except for one patient the additional laboratory costs
were limited
5 loss of retention even with the use of a semitemporary cement was less frequent than in screwretained restorations
6 the larger the construction, the higher the incidence
of complications
7 bruxing habits are a risk for more complications.
The patient should be advised to have regular
maintenance to avoid complications and should accept
the possibility that technical complications leading to
additional maintenance cost, can occur with implantborne crowns and FPDs.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank all colleagues of the former Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Gent
References
1. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP et al. Long-term
evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1. 8-year life
table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 2359
implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:161172.
2. Lambrecht JT, Filippi A, Kunzel AR, Schiel HJ. Long-term
evaluation of submerged and nonsubmerged ITI solid screw
Titanium implants: a 10 year life table analysis of 468
implants. Int J Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:826834.
3. Romeo E, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, Vogel G. Long-term
clinical effectiveness of oral implants in the treatment of
partial edentulism. Seven-year life table analysis of a prospective study with ITI dental implants system used for singletooth restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:133143.
4. Lang NP, Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen
MA. Systematic review of the survival and the complications
rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation
period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth-implant supported FPDs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:643653.
5. McDermott NE, Chuang SK, Woo VV, Dodson TB. Complications of dental implants, frequency and associated risk factors.
Int J Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:848855.
6. Lang NP, Berglundh T, Heitz-Mayfield L, Pjetursson BE, Salvi
GE, Sanz M. Consensus statement and recommended clinical
procedures regarding implant survival and complications. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:150154. Supplement.
7. Payne AG, Solomons YF. Mandibular implant supported
overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of
prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13:246253.
8. Levi A, Psoter WJ, Agar JR, Reisine ST, Taylor TD. Patient selfreported satisfaction with maxillary anterior dental implant
treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:113120.
9. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis J, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang NP.
Patients satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10 year
retrospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2005;16:185193.
10. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen
MA. Systematic review of the survival and the complications
rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation
period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2004;15:625
642.
11. Attard NJ, Zarb GA, Laporte A. Long-term treatment costs
associated with implant supported mandibular prostheses in
edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18:117123.
12. Misch CE, Bediz MW. Implant protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale. Compendium. 1994;15:13301344.
13. Lundgren D, Laurell L. Biomechanical aspects of fixed
bridgework by natural teeth and endosseous implants. Periodontology 2000. 1994;4:2340.
14. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the
incidence of biological and technical complications in implant
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
839