Prosthesis
Prosthesis
Prosthesis
The socket serves as the interface between the residual limb and the prosthesis. It must
not only protect the residual limb, but it must also appropriately transmit the forces
associated with standing and ambulation. The preparatory (temporary) socket will likely
need to be adjusted several times as the volume of the residual limb stabilizes. The
preparatory socket can be created by using a plaster mold of the residual limb as a
.
The concept of total contact is important, because before the advent of the total-contact
PTB socket, transtibial sockets often had an open-ended, plug-fit design, which lead to
numerous skin problems, chronic choke syndrome, ulceration, and other complications.
Total-surfacebearing (TSB) transtibial socket designs are moving away for the concept
of emphasizing patellar tendon weight bearing, but even these require selective loading
and selective relief over certain areas of the residual limb with the PTB design, weight is
distributed over many different areas, such as the anterior and posterior compartments
and the medial tibial flair.
"Total contact socket," which denotes the PTB design. The PTB socket has variations,
including the PTB-supracondylar (PTB-SC) socket and PTB-suprapatellarsupracondylar (PTB-SCSP) socket.
A PTB-SC has high medial and lateral sidewalls that extend above and over the
femoral condyles, providing enhanced mediolateral stability and self-suspension for the
prosthesis.
The PTB-SCSP socket furthers the PTB-SC concept by also extending the anterior
aspect so that the patella is enclosed within the socket. The PTB-SCSP socket gives
additional stiffness to the mediolateral walls and applies force proximal to the patella
during stance, in this way providing sensory feedback to limit genu recurvatum. The
PTB-SC and PTB-SCSP sockets are used primarily for amputees with short residual
limbs in order to improve varus/valgus control and to provide greater surface area for
weight distribution.
An alternative option is a joint-and-corset system, which is especially good for heavyduty use .This system may be used to increase the weight-bearing surface area onto
the thigh or to off-load the transtibial residual limb, transferring the weight to the thigh.
The joint-and-corset system is also used when there is a need to provide great
mediolateral stability for the knee of a transtibial amputee. Another option is a rigid
frame with a flexible liner; the outer rigid frame has windows that provide additional
pressure relief.
An alternative socket design for transtibial amputees is the TSB socket that is used with
an elastomeric liner system. The TSB socket is made from a cast of the residual limb
that has minimal modifications. When used with gel liners (see the images below), the
TSB socket is believed to distribute pressures more uniformly within the socket. It
should be kept in mind, however, that the gel liners themselves have their own set of
problems, including increased motion and, particularly, rotatory instability that leads to
skin irritation and breakdown.
The relative advantages and disadvantages of the TSB socket versus PTB socket are
unique to each individual. When a comfortable fit with one socket style cannot be
achieved, empirically switching to the other may be successful.
The most commonly fabricated socket for transfemoral amputations is the ischial
containment socket. There are a number of subtle variations in this socket design. The
socket has a wide anteroposterior dimension and a narrow mediolateral dimension. This
design replaced the quadrilateral socket design, which had a wide mediolateral
dimension and a narrower anteroposterior dimension
The ischial containment socket was initially designed to provide compression of soft
tissues and limited abduction of the femur within the socket during the stance phase. It
has been subsequently been demonstrated that resecuring the transected adductor
muscles distally is more important and effective in controlling the lateral movement of
the femur in the socket, resulting in improved prosthetic ambulation.
Self-suspension of the socket: This makes use of the anatomic shape of the
residual limb (Syme or knee disarticulation).
The 4-bar linkage design and shifting center of rotation provide knee stability;
cosmesis is excellent, especially during sittingtherefore, this design is used for knee
disarticulations and short residual limbs
The hydraulic knee (pneumatic or oil) allows for cadence variance; the design
uses a piston in a fluid-filled cylinder that accommodates the swing phase of the
patient's gait; the knee is heavy, costly, and requires high maintenance
The manual-locking knee provides the most stability, but the gait is awkward and
energy consuming; however, it is ideal for a hemiparetic residual limb
Add a note on hydraulic based C leg and Magnetorheologic fluis based Rheo knee?
The hydraulic-based Otto Bock C-Leg (Otto Bock Health Care) provides several
benefits over purely mechanical knee systems. These microprocessor-controlled knees
improve upon the timing of the hydraulic and pneumatic knees. The patient can
ambulate at greater speeds with optimal, biomechanically correct symmetry while
expending less energy. Most importantly, the user can safely walk step-over-step up and
down stairs. The built-in battery lasts anywhere from 25-40 hours, which means that it
can support a full day of activity. The recharge can be performed overnight or while
traveling in a car (via a cigarette lighter adapter).
The magnetorheologic-fluidbased Rheo Knee (Ossur; Ossur North America) is capable
of "learning" how the patient walks. Electronic sensors on the artificial joint measure the
joint's angle and the loads it is bearing 1000 times per second while a computer chip
controls the viscosity of magnetic fluid inside the knee. Tiny metal particles suspended
in the fluid form small chains when the magnetic field is turned on, causing the fluid to
become thicker. That, in turn, affects the stiffness of the joint, which is modified
constantly while the knee is in use, allowing for a smooth swing of the leg. However, the
cost of technologically advanced knees is prohibitory for most amputees.
Advantages
Single-axis,
Simple
constant
Durable
friction
Disadvantages
Only constant
swing phase control
Excellent for
pediatric patients
No stance
Lowmaintenance
Possible Uses
control
Useful for
patients who have
Polycentric
without fluid
(less adjustable to
variation in cadence
speed)
phase
Has varying
Increased
control (also
Shortens shank
disarticulations
Complex
known as
pneumatic)
toe clearance
Natural and
Knee
Long
transfemoral (for
(less adjustable to
better cosmetic
variation in cadence
appearance while
speed)
stability)
sitting
Weak hip
extensors
Weight-
Benefits
Requires
activated
stance control
Not very
to manage a bending
walker
regular maintenance
Geriatric
patients
Short residual
limb
General debility
Gait modified
to unload knee
Uneven
surfaces
mechanism if weight
Single
cadence(less
flexed 0-20
adjustable to variation
Helpful to
in cadence speed)
slower candidates
Manual lock
Total stability in
stance phase
No swing
Patient
phase flexion,
requires mechanical
stability in stance
gait
Last resort
Awkward in
sitting
Fluid Control Units
Single-axis,
pneumatic
Responds to
Higher cost
control
May need
more maintenance
From pediatric
patients to adults with
good control
Heavy, but
lighter than hydraulic
units
Gases are
compressible and
may not provide
adequate resistance
during vigorous
activities
Allow less
precision in cadence
control than do
hydraulic units
Single-axis,
hydraulic
Swing responds
to changing gait
May need
more maintenance
From pediatric
patients to adults with
control
speeds
In addition to
cadence variation,
Heavier
Hydraulic
good control
Excellent
Varying stability
through stance
fluid control
Higher cost
May need
Heavier
toe clearance
Knee
disarticulations
Long
transfemoral (for
appearance)
Smoothest gait
Short
transfemoral (for knee
stability)
For patients
Natural and
better cosmetic
appearance while
frequency
sitting
Variable
cadence
Microprocessor Control
Single axis or
multiaxis
Onboard
Highest cost
microprocessor,
Heavy
hydraulics,
Unproven track
For active
patients
For patients
pneumatics, and
record for
servomotors to adjust
dependability
frequency
Allows more
natural movement
Energy saving
Describe the Pylon and the ankle components of lower limb prostheses?
The pylon is a simple tube or shell that attaches the socket to the terminal device.
Pylons have progressed from simple, static shells to dynamic devices that allow axial
rotation and that absorb, store, and release energy. The pylon can be an exoskeleton
(soft foam contoured to match the other limb and covered with a hard, laminated shell)
or an endoskeleton (an internal, metal frame with cosmetic soft covering).
The ankle function is usually incorporated into the terminal device. A separate ankle
joint can be beneficial in heavy-duty industrial work or in sports such as mountain
climbing, swimming, and rowing. However, the additional weight of a separate joint
requires more energy expenditure and greater limb strength to control the additional
motion.
Prosthetic feet
The 5 basic functions of the prosthetic foot are as follows:
Absorb shock
Advantages
Disadvantages
Possible Uses
Rigid Keel
SACH
Inexpensive
Energy
General use
Light (lightest
consuming
foot available)
Durable
(solid ankle,
Reliable
Children (the
Rigid
prosthetics are
Best used
durable)
on a flat surface
cushioned heel)
If ambulation
needs are limited
(composed of a
wooden keel and a
compressible heel)
Single-Axis Foot
Movement in 1 plane
(dorsiflexion and
Adds stability to
prosthetic knees
plantarflexion)
Greater
To enhance
weight (70%
knee stability
heaver than
(For a
SACH)
Greater
cost
Greater
maintenance
Multiaxis Foot
Allows dorsiflexion,
plantarflexion,
inversion, eversion,
and rotation
Multidirectional
motion
Relatively
bulky
Permits some
rotation
Accommodates
uneven surfaces
Ambulation
on uneven surfaces
Heavy
Absorbs
torsional forces
produced during
Relieves stress
Products:
College Park
prostheses
Blatchford/En
dolite Multiflex foot
Otto Bock
Greissinger foot
Available with
Greater
latitude of
movement may
ambulation
The foots
deflection and
required to deflect
decreased
response to users
coordination
unstable
energy expenditure
with ambulation.
College Park
Trustep
Flexible Keel
SAFE (stationary
Flexible keel
Heavy
ankle, flexible
Multidirectional
Greater
endoskeleton)
motion
cost
Moisture and grit
resistant
Not
cosmetic
Accommodates
uneven surfaces
Absorbs rotary
torques
Does not
offer
inversion/eversion
Greater
Ambulation
on uneven surfaces
Elastic keel
foot
Conforms to
uneven ground
STEN (stored
Elastic keel
energy)
Moderate cost
Similar to
Similar to
SAFE's
SAFE's possible
disadvantages
use
Moderate
to heavy weight
When
smooth rollover is
needed
Accommodates
many shoe styles
Mediolateral
stability similar to that
of SACH
Advantages
Disadvantages
Possible Uses
High cost
Jogging,
Energy
storing
No SACH
Smooth
rollover
heel, making it
sports
difficult to change
Conservin
compressibility of
(composed of a plastic, Cor U-shaped, cantilevered
keel that functions like a
compressed spring
general
heel
g the patient's
energy
Light
High cost
storing
reinforced nylon/Kevlar;
Jogging,
Conservin
spring as the
Foot has
energy
rollover
deflection plates)
Very
stable
mediolaterally
Highest
solid-ankle foot
Lightweig
High cost
ht
Similar to
those of the
Carbon Copy 2
Energy
Foot
storing
(lightweight, nonarticulated,
energy-storing foot; includes
2 deflection plates, situated
anteriorly and posteriorly)
Ossur Flex-Foot
Very light
Greatest
energy storing
capability
Most
Very high
cost
Running,
jumping, vigorous
Alignment
can be cumbersome
sports
Conservin
g the patient's
stable
mediolaterally
Lowest
energy
inertia
Flex-Walk
Jaipur foot came into existence depending on socio economic and cultural needs of
squatting, cross leg sitting and bare foot walking. It consists of three structural blocks
almost simulating normal foot and ankle. Fore foot and heel are made up of sponge
rubber and middle ankle portion is made up of light wood. Three components are bound
together and enclosed in a rubber shell and vulcanized in a dye to provide cosmetic
appearance of real foot. Its very cost effective, does not require any shoe .Patient can
walk bare foot on prostheses. Patient can walk on uneven surface since it provides
enough dorsiflexion. It is made up off water proof materials making patients walking on
muddy and watery fields.
For the floor tread rubber compound is used rest of the foot is filled with cushion rubber
which is lighter and more resilient. Rubber is reinforced with rayon cord dripped in
rubber gum. Metatarsal block is filled with single piece of sponge rubber placed in the
metatarsal region. It provides stability and shape to the fore foot. The length of the
metatarsal block corresponds to the lenghth of the metatarsal from the base to just
before the head of metatarsal. It is higher medially and posterior and tapers down
gradually lateral and anterior. The anterior end of block has a curve simulating the
normal metatarsal arch. The sponge rubber block extends from heel to posterior part of
the metatarsal block. Pieces of sponge rubber sole are stacked one above the other
with glue to required height. The stump mold is placed over the top layer and outline is
carved so that lowest portion of mold layer snuggly fits the sponge rubber.
SACH FOOT-Solid Ankle Cushion Heel was designed by Eberhart and Radcliff in 1958.
It is made up of wooden keel which acts as a solid ankle as well as portion of heel.It has
a flat arch portion,a rounded lower front end portion, a flat top and curved instep portion.
A re enforcing member comprising of highly resilient synthetic resin strip is placed in
the rear end to the above mentioned flat arch portion.Its front end extends to said toe
portion to give predetermined flexibility.The keel is made to contribute to some portion of
the heel.Its density and toe flexibility are controlled by compostion gauge ,length and
number of synthetic resin strips. The resin bonds the keel with reinforcing member
used. SACH foot is made up of
1 Inelastic keel made up of wood without any ankle joint.
2 A molded polymer of rubber completely covering the core except the portion
where it completely comes in contact with the artificial limb.
3 Either a flexible steel spring as a band of belting material bonds with the core and
extends to the front end towards toe section.
4 Cushion heel of micro cellular rubber.
Adhesive bonds are used to strengthen core, rubber and belting. Reinforcing material is
a plurality of strips or single strip of nylon with thickness of 3mm to 6mm. Nylon gives
good bonding and resilience with foams such as PU.
SACH foot requires various degrees of flexibility in the toes and the density in the heel
in order to provide different height weight characteristics.
Madras Foot
It is mainly used in southern parts of India mainly in Tamil nadu and kerala. It is
handicraft foot made in the work shop of government institute of rehabilitative
medicine(GIRM). It is the first customized artificial foot made in India suiting the
functional need. It is composed of Wooden keel,canvas rubber,hard rubber,soft rubber
and swade leather. The wooden keel extends from rare to front end up till the middle
part of the foot. Anteriorly it is composed of alternate layers of hard and soft rubbers
which is incorporated to keel with adhesive glue. The alternative hard and soft layers
of rubber are given to the heel to provide diminished ankle. Anterior and posterior
portion of madras foot are made up of hard and soft rubber which are separated by
5mm thick canvas rubber sheet. The wood used is Red cedar wood. It has the
advantage of bare foot walking,durability and cultural modifications like Toe
ring( separated first and second toe.)
1.
Appearance
SACH Foot doesnt look like a
It looks like a Normal Foot.
2.
Normal Foot.
SACH Foot requires a closed
shoe to protect as well as hide it. Foot. But in case someone wants to wear a
shoe, he can do it comfortably with a flat
3.
heel shoe.
Movements & Activities of Daily Living
Wooden Keel is long enough to Metallic keel (carriage bolt) is confined to
restrict/limit movements in all
4.
at unnatural sites.
Squatting is not possible with
comfortable.
available.
It is very economical.
cost.
Financial Advantage
12. 8000 U.S. Dollar
35 U.S. Dollar
Fitment Time
13. 3 Months
1 Hours
SACH FOOT
BKA actually requires less energy consumption than does ambulation with crutches.
However, ambulating with an AKA requires more energy than ambulating with crutches
does, which makes the cardiopulmonary status of the patient more significant.
As noted earlier, lower limb prosthetics are devices designed to replace the function or
appearance of the missing lower limb as much as possible. The reasons for,
terminology, and types of lower-extremity amputations; myoplasty and myodesis; and
determinants of a successful outcome with prosthetic use are reviewed in this section.
What is the difference between myodesis and myoplasty?
Myoplasty and myodesis
There are 2 approaches to managing the muscle in the limb during amputation:
myodesis and myoplasty.
With a myodesis, the muscles and fasciae are sutured directly to the distal residual
bone through drill holes. The objective of this technique is to provide a structurally
stable residual limb, with the insertions of the residual muscles securely attached to
maintain their function; this ultimately results in better prosthetic control and function.
Myodesis is not always performed, because when attempted by even the most
experienced surgical hands, it often fails. Myodesis is contraindicated in patients with
severe peripheral vascular disease, because the blood supply to the muscle may be
compromised.
Myoplasty requires the surgeon to suture the opposing muscles in the residual limb to
each other and to the periosteum or to the distal end of the cut bone. Sufficient muscle
stretch must be provided to maintain active muscle control of the residual limb following
amputation, but without producing so much muscle tension that the blood supply is
compromised. A well-performed myoplasty can provide some distal soft-tissue padding
over the residual bone and result in a stable, functional residual limb. On occasion,
some myoplasties will not securely anchor to the distal residual limb, resulting in a
movable soft-tissue sling, with a bursa developing between the soft tissues and the
underlying bone. Some of these bursa can become symptomatic and painful.
Partial foot amputations: These are more weight bearing than end bearing
(transmetatarsal amputation, Lisfranc amputation, Chopart amputation)
Syme amputation
Observed Gait
Phase
Abnormality
Initial contact to
Possible Cause
Modifications
Abrupt heel
loading
response
flexion
Suggested
Excessive heel
lever*
Realign
prosthetic foot,
Increase heel
flexion
Learned gait
prosthesis
Gait training,
pattern
Quadriceps
gait strengthening
weakness
Loose socket,
poor alignment
Inadequate
suspension
Midstance
Medial or
lateral socket thrust
Lateral trunk
shift over prosthesis
Realign
prosthesis
Loose socket
Prosthesis too
Replace
socket
Adjust socks
elevates
Adjust length
of prosthesis
Midstance to
Early knee
Inadequate toe
lever
Realign
prosthesis, replace
foot
Terminal stance
Heel-off too
Excessive toe
lever
early
Heel-off
excessively delayed
Realign
prosthesis
Too much
socket extension
Inadequate toe
lever
Too much
socket flexion
Swing phase
Prosthetic foot
drags
Prosthesis too
Shorten limb
long
Modify
Inadequate
suspension
suspension
Successive
double support
Uneven step
length
Hip flexion
contracture, gait
Physical
therapy
insecurity
Uncomfortable
socket
Adjust socket
fit
Observed Gait
Possible Cause
Abnormality
Initial contact to
loading
Modifications
Foot rotation at
heel strike
Suggested
Poor socket
fit/rotation
response
Adjust socket
fit, add belt for
rotation control
Knee buckling
Reduce heel
stiffness
Realign limb,
lever*
Incorrect
prosthetic knee
alignment, weak hip
trochanter-knee-
extensors
ankle alignment
Employ gait
training and
strengthening
Mid stance
Lateral trunk
bend or shift over
prosthesis
Prosthetic limb
abducted
Realign
prosthesis
Too much
socket abduction, foot
Adjust length
of prosthesis
Adjust socket
fit
Gait training
and strengthening
limb
Accept,
Medial groin
pain
Poor mediallateral prosthetic
control
Poor socket fit
Weak hip
abductors
Initial swing
Uneven heel
rise
Adjust knee
friction or damping
extension
Swing phase
Circumduction
or prosthetic limb
Inadequate
knee flexion, knee too
stiff
Adjust knee
friction or damping
Adjust length
Prosthesis too
long, inadequate
suspension
of prosthesis
Physical
therapy
Poor gait
pattern
Whips
Improper knee
rotational alignment
Excessive
Realign
prosthesis Adjust
socket fit
socket rotation
Successive
double support length
Uneven step
Hip flexion
contracture
Insufficient
socket flexion
Physical
therapy
Realign
prosthesis
Pros
Cons
Cosmetic
Most lightweight
Best cosmesis
Least function
Less harnessing
Low-cost glove stains
easily
Body powered
Moderate cost
Moderately lightweight
Most harnessing
Most durable
Least satisfactory
appearance
Highest sensory feedback
Increased energy
expenditure
Variety of prehensors
available for various
activities
Moderate or no harnessing
Heaviest
Most expensive
needed to operate
Most maintenance
Moderate cosmesis
Limited sensory
More function-proximal areas feedback
cases
for training
Battery-powered TD
or TD
weights forearm
battery-powered TD
Increased TD pinch
If excursion to TD and batterypowered elbow
All-cable excursion to TD
Low-maintenance TD
least cosmetic
TD-Terminal devise
When limited control sites (muscles) in a residual limb are available to control all
of the desired features of the prosthesis, a 1-site/2-function (single-site) device may be
used; this system uses 1 electrode to control both functions of a paired activity (eg,
flexion and extension); the patient uses muscle contractions of different strengths to
differentiate between flexion and extension (eg, a strong contraction opens the device,
and a weak contraction closes it)
Socket
Suspension
Control-cable system
Terminal device
Harnessed-based systems
Self-suspending sockets
Suction sockets
Suspension Options
Suspension
Harness
Figure-8
Indications
Advantages
Transradial
Transhumeral
Disadvantages
produces discomfort
Light to normal
activities
Shoulder
Transradial
Greater lifting
Reduced control
saddle and
ability, more
compared with
chest strap
comfortable
figure-8 harness;
than figure-8
difficult to adjust in
harness
women, because
Transhumeral
Heavy lifting
Self-
Munster
Wrist
suspending
Northwestern
disarticulation
Supracondylar
Ease of use
Limited lifting
capacity compared
with harness
systems,
compromised
Elbow
cosmesis, reduced
disarticulation
elbow flexion
Short transradial
Myoelectric
transradial
Suction
Secure
Requires stable
suspension,
residual volume,
tissue cover
elimination of
harder to put on
suspension
than other
straps
suspension systems
Accommodate
Greater cleaning
locking pin
limb volume
and hygiene
change with
requirements,
socks,
Transhumeral
Compromised
limbs with
can be
scarring or
reduced skin
uncomfortable in
impaired skin
shear
hot climates
integrity
Harnessed-based systems and their variants are the most commonly used systems. For
the figure-8 strap, a harness loops around the axilla on the sound side. This anchors the
harness and provides the counterforce for suspension and control-cable forces. On the
prosthetic side, the anterior (superior) strap carries the major suspending forces to the
prosthesis by attaching directly to the socket in a transhumeral prosthesis or indirectly to
a transradial socket through an intermediate Y-strap and triceps cuff. The posterior
(inferior) strap on the prosthetic side attaches to the control cable.
For heavier lifting or as an alternative to the figure-8 harness, a shoulder saddle with a
chest-strap suspension can be used with a transradial prosthesis. A chest strap alone is
sometimes used to suspend a transhumeral prosthesis. The figure-9 harness is an
alternative for a patient with a long transradial amputation or a wrist disarticulation, in
order to provide the control cable's necessary attachment point and counterforce.
Although the figure-9 harness provides minimal suspension and requires a selfsuspending socket, it is more comfortable than a figure-8 harness
Self-suspending and suction sockets are capable of providing adequate prosthetic
suspension without the use of a harness. However, either design can also be used with
a harness suspension to provide for a more secure suspension of the prosthesis.
Self-suspending sockets are largely limited to wrist or elbow disarticulations and to
transradial amputations. This socket design is most commonly utilized with an externally
powered, myoelectrically controlled transradial prosthesis. An example of this type is the
Munster socket. Proper fit of this socket precludes full elbow extension.
Suction suspension is similar to lower extremity options. These sockets use an external,
elastic suspension sleeve; a one-way air valve; or roll-on gel suspension liner with a pinlocking mechanism. Upper limb suction sockets (unlike nonsuction sockets) require a
total contact socket design and ideally a residual limb with no skin invagination,
scarring, and stable volume to avoid skin problems, such as a choke syndrome. Suction
socket designs are most commonly used for the patient with a transhumeral amputation.
Explain about Control-cable mechanisms?
Body-powered prosthetic limbs use cables to link movements of one part of the body to
the prosthesis in order to control a prosthetic function. This is usually a movement of the
humerus, shoulder, or chest, which is transferred via a Bowden cable (a single cable
passing through a single housing) to activate the terminal device of the prosthesis. A
control cable used to activate a single prosthetic component or function is called a
single-control cable, or Bowden cable system. A dual-control cable system uses the
same cable to control 2 prosthetic functions (such as flexion of the elbow and, when the
elbow is locked, activation of the terminal device). This latter control cable setup is
accomplished with a single cable passing through 2 separate cable housings known as
a fair lead cable system.
Body movements that are captured for prosthetic control include the following:
Precision grip (ie, pincher grip): The pad of the thumb and index finger are in
opposition to pick up or pinch a small object (eg, a small bead, pencil, grain of rice)
Tripod grip (ie, palmar grip, 3-jaw chuck pinch): The pad of the thumb is against
the pads of the index and middle finger
Lateral grip (ie, key pinch): The pad of the thumb is in opposition to the lateral
aspect of the index finger to manipulate a small object (such as turning a key in a lock)
Hook power grip: The distal interphalangeal joint and proximal interphalangeal
joint are flexed with the thumb extended (as when carrying a briefcase by the handle)
Spherical grip: Tips of the fingers and thumb are flexed (when, for example,
screwing in a light bulb or opening a doorknob)
terminal devices are usually less functional and more expensive than active terminal
devices.
With a voluntary closing mechanism, the terminal device is open at rest. The patient
uses the control-cable motion to close the terminal device, grasping the desired object.
This type of mechanism is usually heavier and less durable than a voluntary opening
mechanism. It offers better control of closing pressure (up to 20-25 lb) and is more
physiologic, but active effort may be needed to maintain closure for some terminal
devices to prevent dropping items. Because of the need to maintain an active muscle
contraction for terminal device closure, the amputee can get some sensory feedback
with this type of terminal device.
. With a myoelectrically controlled device, it is possible for the patient to initiate palmar
tip grasp by contracting residual forearm flexors and to release by contracting residual
extensors.
Most hook-style terminal devices provide the equivalent of active lateral pinch grip,
whereas active hands provide a 3-point chuck action. Many different options are
available for terminal devices that address occupations, hobbies, and sports.
Multiarticulating prosthetic hands terminal devices are electrically powered and have
significantly more potential functionality than other terminal device types. Grip,
prehension, and positioning patterns are programmed into the hand, limited only by the
number of control sites available. Grip force is varied by increasing the electric signal to
the hand. Multiarticulating hands are more fragile and should not be used for heavy-duty
activities. Many individuals with limb loss use a multiarticulating hand for everyday tasks
and a myoelectric hook or body-powered prosthesis with a hook for heavy-duty tasks.
There are terminal devices available for specific activities, such as golfing, bowling,
swimming, tennis, weight lifting, fishing, skiing, shooting pool, rock climbing, baseball,
hunting (bow and rifle), photography, and the playing of musical instruments (guitars
and drums).
A wrist flexion unit can provide an amputee (especially a bilateral upper extremity
amputee) with improved function for midline activities, such as shaving, manipulating
buttons, or performing perineal care. A wrist flexion unit is usually employed on only 1
side, most often the longer of the 2 residual limbs but, ultimately, it should be placed on
the side that the amputee prefers. Multifunction wrist units have become available.
Elbow units
Elbow units are chosen based on the level of the amputation and the amount of residual
function. It is helpful to remember that supination and pronation of the forearm decrease
as the site of amputation becomes more proximal. Flexible and rigid elbow hinges are
available, as are internal locking elbow joints.
Flexible elbow hinges are utilized for medium and long transradial amputations and
wrist disarticulations. When the patient has sufficient voluntary pronation and
supination, as well as elbow flexion and extension, flexible elbow hinges help translate
any residual active pronation and supination to the terminal device. A triceps pad or cuff
helps distribute suspension forces and is needed to anchor the control cable.
Rigid elbow hinges provide additional stability in cases with short transradial
amputations, in which a patient has no residual, active forearm pronation and supination
but does have adequate native elbow flexion. Rigid elbow hinges are available in singleaxis or polycentric versions. These hinges are important in amputees with short
transradial limbs. In patients with very short transradial, residual limbs or limited active
elbow flexion, the use of step-up elbow hinges can improve prosthetic function by
increasing functional, active elbow motion. This system uses special elbow joints
together with a split-socket design permitting the prosthetic forearm and attached
terminal device to move 2 of motion for every 1 of actual residual limb and elbow
motion. Because movement of the limb and the prosthesis are not directly connected,
the proprioceptive feedback is compromised.
The standard elbow component for a transhumeral prosthesis is an internal locking
elbow joint. This allows for 135 of flexion and can be locked into a number of preset
flexed positions. The standard internal elbow joint incorporates a turntable that allows
passive internal or external humeral rotation. Elbow spring-lift assists are available and
are used to counterbalance the weight of the forearm, making elbow flexion easier.
The standard elbow unit requires a length of 8-10 cm to be adequately installed in a
transhumeral prosthesis. If the level of amputation is less than 8-10 cm proximal to the
distal end of the humerus, then an internal locking elbow unit cannot provide symmetric
elbow centers (prosthesis and sound upper extremity). Even if an asymmetric elbow
position (compared with the sound side) is acceptable, functional problems will result
with the prosthesis from this alignment.
Unless the forearm section of the prosthesis is lengthened to accommodate the
lengthened arm section, the amputee will not be able to reach the midline or mouth, with
the prosthesis compromising function. However, lengthening the forearm to
accommodate the added arm length will result in difficulties when the patient tries to
perform bimanual activities, and it usually will not be cosmetically acceptable to the
patient. For long transhumeral amputations or elbow disarticulations, locking external
elbow joints may be used, but they are not cosmetic or as durable as internal elbow
joints.
Shoulder and forequarter units
When an amputation is required at the shoulder or forequarter level, function is very
difficult to restore. This is due to a combination of the weight of the prosthetic
components and the diminished overall function when combining multiple prosthetic
joints, as well as the increased energy expenditure necessary to operate the prosthesis.
For this reason, some individuals with a unilateral amputation at this level choose a
purely cosmetic prosthesis to improve body image and the fit of their clothes or decide
to go without a prosthesis.