Journal of Textile Science and Technology, 2015, 1, 93-100

Published Online November 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jtst

http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jtst.2015.13010

A Review of Nano Particle Usage on Textile

Material against Ultra Violet Radiation
Mohammed Asif Hossain1*, Moshiur Rahman2
1

Department of Textile Engineering, BGMEA University of Fashion & Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Department of Textile Engineering, Northern University Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Received 3 September 2015; accepted 6 November 2015; published 9 November 2015

Copyright 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract
Ultra violet radiation is detrimental to human skin and responsible for various skin diseases that
is now worldwide growing concern for the people. Sun screen lotions, however, considered best
possible solution but its temporary attachment didnt bring the real impact. The advancement of
nano technology provides a number of techniques to introduce UV protected fabric by applying
certain semi conductor metal oxide. So many researches have been carried out to coat the fabric
using certain nano particles namely ZnO and TiO2 to improve the UV absorption capacity of material as well as increasing UPF value to protect the human skin which have been playing a significant role to provide UV protected clothing. This paper deals with the harmful impact of ultra violet
radiation on human skin, UPF measurement method and UV protective finishing on textile material using nano ZnO and nano TiO2 particle.

Keywords
Ultra Violet Radiation, UPF, Nano ZnO, Nano TiO2

1. Introduction
Sunlight is one of the renewable energy sources and indespensible parts of living species. Sunlight consists of
three rays depending on their variation of wave length: ultraviolet (UV) rays, visible light and infrared rays.
Among these, ultraviolet rays have shortest wavelength and infrared rays have largest wavelength along with no
visibility to eyes. The remaining one is the visible light in which wavelength ranges from 400 nm to 700 nm
which includes all basic primary color, secondary color and tertiary color. Ultra violet rays can be divided into
three categories: UVA, UVB and UVC in which each of the rays contains the wavelength 315 - 400 nm, 280 *

Corresponding author.

How to cite this paper: Hossain, M.A. and Rahman, M. (2015) A Review of Nano Particle Usage on Textile Material against
Ultra Violet Radiation. Journal of Textile Science and Technology, 1, 93-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jtst.2015.13010

M. A. Hossain, M. Rahman

315 nm and 100 - 280 nm, respectively [1]. Among the total percentage amount of the incident sunlight on earth
surface, the major percentage goes to visible light of having 50%, infra red radiation at 45% and the remaining
part is ultra violet radiation which is only 5% [2]. The intensity of ultra violet radiation depends on geographical
location of the place, suns altitude, season, time of the day as well as closely connected to the incident angle [2]
[3]. Though only small amount of ultra violet radiation falls on the earth, it has adverse effect on human skin.
UVR can cause cellular damage and photoaging of the skin and skin cancer by occurring DNA damage (formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers), gene mutations, immunosuppression, oxidative stress and inflammatory
responses [1] [4]. The radiation of UVA easily passes through the atmosphere and falls on the earth as the stratospheric ozone layer cannot filter those rays which in long-term exposure causes aging of the skin and induces
immediate and persistent pigmentation (tanning) [1] [2]. Around 1% - 10% ultraviolet B radiation (UVB) comes
on earth surface as the stratospheric ozone layer filter the major proportion of this rays. It is responsible causing
sunburns, tanning, photoaging and skin cancer and has been found that UVB radiation is thousand times more
effective in causing sunburn than UVA [1] [5]. It is a matter of luck that no UVC radiation comes on the earth as
the whole proportion is filtered out by ozone layer which is more dangerous for skin damaging than that of UVA
and UVC. The effectiveness of ozone layer is now under threat as the use of a particular gas called CFCs (Chloro-fluoro-Carbons) is increasing day by day which is likely to damage the ozone layer. Realizing the facts it is
necessary to protect skin from over exposure of ultra violet radiation. To keep oneself save from ultra violet
radiation it is required to avoid the UVR source but it is not the wise decision as our everydays work related to
combine integration of various outdoor activities. It is recommended that to wear a sunscreen, avoid going out in
sunbath or cover up with clothing coated in ultraviolet protective agent [6] [7]. Sun screen has some disadvantages as it only absorbs UVB rays (280 - 315 nm) but not UVA rays (315 - 400 nm) and it needs to be attached
to skin frequently. In recent years scientists on textile materials have paid a great attention on developing nano
metal particle for coating on the fabric that can not only absorb the ultra violet radiation but also impart considerable improvement in physico chemical properties of fabric.

2. Ultra Violet Radiation and Human Skin

There is a certain relation between the wavelength and energy of the ultra violet radiation that can be derived by
Plancks equation, E = h where E symbolizes the energy level, h represents the Plancks Constant which value
is equal to 6.626 1034 Js1 and is the frequency of the electromagnetic wave. Here frequency is equal to c/
where c refers the speed of light that equals to 3 108 ms1 and is the wavelength of radiation. So the plank
relation can be written as E = h(c/); the smaller will be the wavelength of UV rays, the higher will be the energy
level that is more harmful to living species. From this equation the order of potency can written as UVC > UVB >
UVA. It is considered that Ultraviolet B radiation is more effective in causing sunburn than UVA [1] [8] [9].
Besides, skin is the longest part of human body comprised of three basic layers: Epidermis (outer), Dermis
(middle) and Subcutaneous layer. Infra red radiation and visible light can penetrate all the three layer on the
other hand UVA radiation can penetrate upto the layer of dermis while UVB radiation can penetrate upto the
layer of epidermis as shown in Figure 1. It is clear that longest wavelength ultra violet radiation penetrate deeply than the ultra violet radiation of shortest wave length [2] [10].
However, 6 basic types of skin can be derived according to the sensitivity of light and tendency to pigmentation as shown in Table 1, where the minimal erythemal dose vary along with skin type.

3. Ultra Violet Protective Factor (UPF)

Ultra violet protective factor represents the ultra violet radiation blocking capability of textile fabric to protect
the skin. It is defined by the ratio of time required to show redness on the skin with and without protection, under the exposure of sun light [11]. The UPF can be calculated by following Equation (1):

UPF =

MED protected skin

MED unprotected skin

(1)

Here, MED symbolizes minimal erythemal dose or amount of radiant energy required to first pigmentation of
skin after 22 2 hours of continuous exposure. Table 2 shows the various UPF rating along with the category.
There are two methods using for measuring ultra violet protective factor, namely Vivo Method and Vitro
Method.

94

M. A. Hossain, M. Rahman

Figure 1. UV radiation and the skin [8].

Table 1. Effect of UV rays on different types of skin [3].
Skin type
(appearance unexposed)

Critical dose
mJ/cm2

Self protection
time (min)

I. White

15 - 30

5 - 10

Burns easily, has the highest risk of premature skin ageing and
greatest risk of developing skin cancer

II. White

25 - 35

8 - 12

Burn and only rarely tan

III. Brownish

30 - 50

10 - 15

Tan and occasionally burn

IV. Brown

45 - 60

15 - 20

Tan and occasionally burn

V. Brown

60 - 100

20 - 35

Sufficient levels of melanin and rarely burns, easily tan

VI. Dark brown-black

100 - 200

35 - 70

Sufficient levels of melanin pigment provide protection.

Very rarely burns, easily tan.

Risk level

Table 2. Ultra violet protective factor ratings [12].

UPF range

Protection category

Effective UV-R transmission (%)

UPF rating

15 - 24

Good

6.7 - 4.2

15, 20

25 - 39

Very Good

4.1 - 2.6

25, 30, 35

40 - 50, 50+

Excellent

Less than 2.5

40, 45, 50, 50+

3.1. Vitro Method

Direct and diffuse transmittance is an important factor for determining UV protectiveness of a textile material.
Figure 2 represents how ultra violet light acts on textile material as there occur reflection, absorption, scattering
and also direct transmission.
Spectrophotometers and spectroradiometers are useful device for the measurement of spectral radiation. Both
these devices have the capability of taking scattered and transmittance radiation with the help of an integrated
sphere that located behind the sample. Spectrophotometers fitted with double monochromators have wide dynamic range and high accuracy as well as deuterium or xenon arc lamps, are required to provide reference data
[13]. To determine the in vitro UPF, the spectral irradiance (both source and transmitted spectrum) is weighted
against the erythemal action spectrum [14] and the UPF is calculated as below:

UPF =

E S T

E S T d

95

(2)

M. A. Hossain, M. Rahman

Figure 2. UV absorption, transmission and reflectance in textile

material [13].

where E is the erythemal effectiveness of ultra violet radiation; S, is the solar spectral irradiance in watts per
meter squared; T, is the spectral transmission of the sample, d is the bandwidth in nanometers, is the wavelength in nanometers, and the integrals are calculated over the wavelength range between 290 - 400 nm.

3.2. Vivo Method

In this method a certain layer of thickness of lotion is applied on the back side of the test sample. Then the
treated sample along with the unprotected skin is irradiated with standardized lamp that resemble the spectrum
as closely as possible with that of sunlight.UPF is then determined from the quotient of the time it takes for skin
reddening to occur with and without sunscreen [15]. Moreover, measurement of UPF by following this method
is very much time consuming and the spectrum of light chosen for measurement is not similar to the sunlight as
well as not very suitable for developing textile fabric against sun protection.

4. UV Blocking Particle
Over the past few years, nano technology has gained tremendous reputation as a key technology for making innovative products and increasing functional characteristic of material which was unforeseen earlier. There may
be two types of UV blocking nano particle, one is organic UV blocker and another inorganic UB blocker. Inorganic UV blockers are considered best as it has no toxicity and chemically stable under long exposure of high
temperature and UV [16]. Certain metal oxide particles such as ZnO TiO2, SiO2 and Al2O3 [17] which all are inorganic compound as well as good UV blocker because these particles absorb the UV rays of equal energy or
higher than their band gap. Among these ZnO [18]-[20] and TiO2 [16] [18] [19] [21] are commonly used. It has
been found that nano sized TiO2 and ZnO have better absorption and scattering capability of ultraviolet radiation
as the nano particle get larger surface area per unit volume and mass than the traditional particle [19]. According
to Rayleighs scattering theory the optimum nano particle size should be between 20 and 40 nm in case of scattering the Ultra Violet radiation between 200 and 400 nm [17].

5. UV Protective Finish by Nano Particle

In recent years UV protective finish by nano particle has been developed by applying various method and techniques. It is now the important potential areas of nano finishing application of nano sized semiconductor oxides
such as TiO2 and ZnO as UV blocker [19].

5.1. ZnO Nano Particle

A Sivakumar et al. [19] synthesized ZnO nano particle using zinc acetate as precursor, by following wet chemical and sol-gel technique for UV protection of textiles to compare with untreated woven fabric. These nano par-

96

M. A. Hossain, M. Rahman

ticles, which size of 9 nm were coated on to the cotton woven (plain weave, 40s count) fabric by adopting paddry-cure method and three different concentration level of nano ZnO solution: 1%, 1.5%, and 2% were taken.
The enhanced concentration of nano solution provided increasing UPF values as well as better UPF values for
repeated wash.
Yadav et al. [20] investigated the effectiveness of nano sized ZnO particle comparing with bulk ZnO as ultraviolet protective agent. ZnO nano particles were prepared by wet chemical method using zinc nitrate and sodium
hydroxide as precursor and soluble starch as solubilizing agent; the size of nano particle was 40 nm. The coating
was done by pad-dry-cure method where the padding solution containing 2% ZnO and 1% acrylic binder; coating fabric was air dried and cured at 140C. UV absorption of nano-ZnO coated fabric was 75% which was
higher than bulk ZnO coated fabric as well as improved tensile strength, air permeability and breaking strength.
S. Khatirvelu et al. [22] studied the improvements of UV blocking properties in cotton fabric and polyester/
cotton fabric using ZnO nano particles. In their research, synthesize of ZnO nano particle was done by using two
methods; in one method ZnCl2 (minimum 98%), NaOH (pellete minimum 99%), 2-propanol (minimum 99.5%)
were used and the other method parameters were same like previous one but 1, 2 ethanediol (minimum 99.5%)
was used instead of water. Paricle size got 20nm and 9 nm respectively for the two process. Two types of woven
and knitted fabric, one was 100% cotton and another was 45:55 polyester/cotton, were used. The coating of
nano-ZnO particle on the fabric was done on pad-dry method, both the fabrics were immersed in 2-propanol
dispersion of 5% nano ZnO and then passed through the squeezer of padding mangle which was further followed by drying in a oven at 130C. That finishing process provided better UV blocking properties in case of
woven fabric than that of knitted fabrics for both of the fabric construction. However, ZnO nano particle, reduced particle size was 9 nm, synthesized by using 1, 2 ethanediol (minimum 99.5%) showed comparatively
higher protection against UV radiation.
Asma farook et al. [23] developed a method where Sol-gel based inorganic-organic hybrid polymers were
modified with nano sized zinc oxide particles and applied on cotton (100%) and cotton/polyester (65%/35%) fabrics. ZnO nano particle were produced by the suspension of precursor and the hydrolyse of that precursor whereas Zinc acetate and isopropanol were used to make precursor and lithium hydroxide was used to hydrolysis the
precursor; average particle size of 30 - 60 nm. Inorganic-organic hybrid polymers were 3-glycidyloxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GPTMS). GPTMS sol were prepared by dissolving 10 ml GPTMS in 100 ml isopropanol before
hydrolysis using 1.22 ml hydrochloric acid. Nano sized ZnO and GPTMS sol both were mixed and followed by
further adding 1-methylimidazo as a catalyst for the cross-linking reaction of the GPTMS. Coating applied on
both fabric by pad-cure method and 100% wet pick up was maintained in the padding process which further followed by curing at 130C. It was found that increasing concentration of ZnO-sol uplifted the UPF value of cotton and cotton blend fabric. However, there was no effect on the UPF value of the fabric after the 5 washing
cycles.
Becheri et al. [24] produced peptised ZnO nano particles from zinc chloride and sodium hydroxide solutions
and applied them onto cotton and wool fabrics. The wool and cotton samples were immersed for 10 minutes in a
2-propanol dispersion of ZnO nanoparticles (5% w/w), under gentle magnetic stirring. The clothes were then
passed through the padder to remove the excess dispersion, and dried in an oven at 130C for 15 minutes at atmospheric pressure. The UV transmittance of the cotton and wool fabric was reduced significantly. After 5
launderings, more than 50% of their initial amount remained on the fabric as the large conglomerates were removed from the fabric surface though the nano particles were not covalently attached to the fabric materials.
Vigneshwaran et al. [25] synthesized Zinc oxide-soluble starch nanocomposites (nano-ZnO) using water as a
solvent and soluble starch as a stabilizer. We have successfully dispersed ZnO nanoparticles inside a soluble
starch matrix using a simple water-based technique. The average size of the ZnO nanoparticles was estimated at
38 3 nm. A fine-medium weight 100% cotton woven fabric (plain weave; 75.30 gm2; ends, 75/inch; picks,
60/inch) was used in this study. Nano-ZnO was applied on the cotton using the pad-dry-cure method. The
cotton fabric (size: 30 cm 30 cm) was immersed in the nano-ZnO (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 or 1.0%) solution and
acrylic binder (1%) for 5 minutes and then it was passed through a padding mangle. After padding, the fabric
was air-dried and then cured for 3 minutes at 140C to polymerize the acrylic binder. The fabric was then immersed for 5 minutes in 2 gram per litre of sodium lauryl sulfate to remove unbound nano-ZnO. It was found
that the nano-ZnO impregnated fabrics retained more than 80% efficiency of both antibacterial and UV-protection functions even after 25 wash cycles.

97

M. A. Hossain, M. Rahman

5.2. TiO2 Nano Particle

Gouda et al. [16] synthesized Nano-TiO2, average size 5 - 10 nm, via reduction of titanium tetrachloride using
sodium borohydride in the presence of poly vinyl pyrrolidone as stabilizing agent. Nano-TiO2 was applied to
cotton fabric sample using pad-dry-cure method. Padding solution was prepared as following; 1 g of nanoparticles was sonicated for 30 minutes with 98 gm water and 1 gm of acrylic binder. 100% wet pick-up was maintained for the fabric sample. Padded fabric sample was dried for 5 minutes at 80C and then cured for 3 minutes
at 140C. They found that Nano-TiO2 loaded cotton fabric sample was durable to wash and it was very good
UV-protection capacity as well as the maintained excellent antibacterial activity even after repeated 20 washing
cycles.
Shalaby et al. [26] investigated a simple and economic approach for enhancing binding efficiency of TiO2
nanoparticles to PET fabrics based on applying the chemical activation method before loading PET fabrics with
TiO2 nanoparticles by sol-gel method. TiO2 colloid solution was prepared by using titanium tetra isopropoxide,
2-propanol and concentrated HNO3. Alkali pre treated PET textiles samples were immersed in TiO2 colloidal
solution, squeezed to the required pickup percent, dried in air at 220C (room temperature) for 24 hours and then
cured in an oven at 130C for 15 minutes. The PET samples were then washed with distilled water to remove
TiO2 particles that did not attach to the fabric surface. Their result exhibited outstanding antimicrobial activity
and UV protection efficiency even after five washing cycles, indicating the excellent laundering durability.
Ugur et al. [27] applied anatase TiO2 nanoparticles (particle size < 25 nm) on cationically modified woven
cotton fabrics by the layer-by-layer molecular self-assembly technique. Positively charged cotton fabrics and
were immersed into the following solutions alternately for 5 min periods: (a) the anionic TiO2 colloid solution;
(b) the deionized water; (c) the cationic TiO2 colloid solution; (d) the deionized water and deposition cycle was
repeated until 10- and 16-layer TiO2/TiO2 films were deposited on cotton fibers. Multilayer film coated cotton
fabrics were dried at 60C and cured at 130C for 3 minutes. They found that, the UPF values were maintained
same for both layers after 10 washing cycles, but after 20 washing cycles the UPF values decreased to 40 and 45
for 10- and 16-layer nano-TiO2 deposited cotton fabrics, respectively.
Li et al. [28] prepared Nano-TiO2 sol to coat on polyester fabric by using by sol-gel method in which which
tetrabutyl titanate was used as precursor and ethanol was used as solvent. The average particle size of the nanometer particles is 23.3 nm ranging uniformly between 5 nm to 50 nm. The plasma pretreated polyester fabrics
dipped into the Nano-TiO2 sol, passed through the padder and then dry out under 80C. The process resulted in
exceptional anti-ultraviolet performance with a phenomenal UPF ascendance reaching up to 50+ without influencing the breaking strength.
Xin et al. [29] studied a permanent UV protection treatment using thin films of sol-gel processed titania. A
nanosol was prepared at room temperature by mixing titanium tetraisopropoxide (Aldrich, 97%) with absolute
ethanol (Riedel, 99.8%) at pH 1 - 2. A thin layer of coating around 100 nm formed on the fiber surface. The results showed that the excellent ultra violet protection rating of the treated fabrics maintained even after 55 home
launderings, indicating a high level of adhesion between the titania layer and the cotton.
Montazer et al. [30] used nano crystalline titanium dioxide to coat the wool fabric. They developed a method where KMnO4 treated scoured wool fabric at first immersed into ultrasonic bath containing three different
concentration level and then dipped into impregnated bath containing cross-linking agent and sodium hypophosphite. The average particle size was 21 nm. Treated samples were cured at 120C for 2 minutes. Their research concluded that with increasing the amount of TiO2 on wool surface, protection against UV rays increased.

5.3. Other Nano Particle Usage

There are also some experiments have been carried out by using silver nano particle, CeO2, SiO2 as ultra viplet
protective agent as well as maintaining multifunctional properties.
Shateri-Khalilabad et al. [31] developed a simple method by using silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) with a high
deposition density were formed on the surface of cotton fabric through an alkali pre-activation followed by in
situ reduction of silver nitrate. The Ag-coated fabric was then reacted with octyltriethoxysilane (OTES) to form
a low surface energy layer on the fiber surface. The fabrics were characterized by ultraviolet-visible reflectance
spectrophotometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and X-ray diffractometry. UV-blocking ability was measured using the AATCC method and the fabric also showed excellent

98

M. A. Hossain, M. Rahman

UV-blocking with the ultraviolet protection factor of 266.01. The AgNPs with the average size of about 500 nm
were formed, which uniformly covered the fiber surfaces. The obtained results from these experiments demonstrated the good durability of the finish against laundering.
Duan et al. [32] first treated the cotton fabrics with CeO2 sol and then modified with a layer of dodecafluoroheptyl-propyl-trimethoxylsilane (DFTMS). The as-prepared CeO2 sol was coated onto the cotton fabric sample
by dip-pad-cure process. The cotton sample was first dipped into the CeO2 sol for 3 minutes and then padded
with a two-roll laboratory padder giving a wet pick-up of 70% - 80%. Finally, the padded substrate was airdried
for 20 min and cured at 170C for 3 minutes. This process was repeated three times to form a dense film of CeO2
xerogel on cotton fabrics. The treated fabrics were then immersed in the ethanol solution of hydrolyzed DFTMS
for 24 hours. They observed a significant transmittance decrease in the UV region, and transmission was reduced to nearly zero in the wavelength below 350 nm, which indicates that the cotton fabric treated with CeO2
sol and hydrolyzed DFTMS may offer better protection from UV radiation than the pristine cotton fabric.
Wang et al. [33] investigated a method which involved the low-temperature preparation of ZnO seeds, hydrothermal growth of ZnO nanorods, bioinspired layer-by-layer deposition of a SiO2 shell on the surface of ZnO
nanorods, and hydrophobic modification SiO2-coated ZnO nanorod array on the cotton textile The treated cotton
textile was found to have a large UV protection factor (UPF = 101.51) together with UV-durable superhydrophobicity, as determined by contact-angle measurement under long-term UV irradiation.

6. Conclusion
There is no alternative option available to avoid ultra violet radiation that emits through sunlight. So, ultra violet
protective finish on textile material achieved significant value on buyers specially those who are from warmer
region of the world. Most of the investigations have been carried out in padding method to apply nano particles
as better UPF value was obtained in almost all of the experiments on textile material. But exhaustion method in
case of applying nano particle on textile substrate is still rare. Further research on this finishing process can
bring out a significant change on applying method.

References
[1]

Das, B.R. (2010) UV Radiation Protective Clothing. Open Textile Journal, 3, 14-21.

[2]

Narayanan, D.L., Saladi, R.N. and Fox, J.L. (2010) Review: Ultraviolet Radiation and Skin Cancer. International
Journal of Dermatology, 49, 978-986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04474.x

[3]

Saravanan, D. (2007) UV Protection Textile Materials. AUTEX Research Journal, 7, 53-62.

[4]

Meeran, S.M., Punathil, T. and Katiyar, S.K. (2008) IL-12 Deficiency Exacerbates Inflammatory Responses in UVIrradiated Skin and Skin Tumors. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 128, 2716-2727.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jid.2008.140

[5]

http://www.skincancer.org/prevention/uva-and-uvb/understanding-uva-and-uvb

[6]

Davis, S., Capjack, L., Kerr, N. and Fedosejcvs, R. (1997) Clothing as Protection from Ultraviolet Radiation: Which
Fabric Is Most Effective? International Journal of Dermatology, 36, 374-379.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00046.x

[7]

Mahler, H.I., Kulik, J.A., Gibbons, F.X., Gerrard, M. and Harrell, J. (2003) Effects of Appearance-Based Intervention
on Sun Protection Intentions and Self-Reported Behaviors. Health Psychology, 22, 199.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.199

[8]

http://www.who.int/uv/faq/uvhealtfac/en/

[9]

Soehnge, H., Ouhtit, A. and Ananthaswamy, O.N. (1997) Mechanisms of Induction of Skin Cancer by UV Radiation.
Frontiers in Bioscience, 2, D538-D551.

[10] Achwal, W.B. (1997) Sun Protection Properties of Textile Substrates. Colourage, 44, 31-32.
[11] Perenich, T.A. (1998) Textiles as Preventive Measures for Skin Cancer. Colourage, 45, 71-73.
[12] http://www.rei.com/learn/xpert-advice/sun-protection.html
[13] Gambichler, T., Altmeyer, P. and Hoffmann, K. (2002) Comparison of Methods: Determination of UV Protection of
Clothing. In: Dummer, R., Nestle, F.O. and Burg, G., Eds., Cancers of the Skin, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 55-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59410-6_8
[14] Matthes, R. (1998) Measurements of Optical Radiation Hazards. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation

99

M. A. Hossain, M. Rahman

Protection; International Commission on Illumination.

[15] Hilfiker, R., Kaufmann, W., Reinert, G. and Schmdt, E. (1996) Improving Sun Protection Factors of Fabrics by Applying UV-Absorbers. Textile Research Journal, 66, 61-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004051759606600201
[16] Gouda, M. and Aljaafari, A.I. (2012) Augmentation of Multifunctional Properties of Cellulosic Cotton Fabric Using
Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles. Advances in Nanoparticles, 1, 29-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/anp.2012.13005
[17] Wong, Y.W.H., Yuen, C.W.M., Leung, M.Y.S., Ku, S.K.A. and Lam, H.L.I. (2006) Selected Applications of Nanotechnology in Textiles. AUTEX Research Journal, 6, 1-8.
[18] Tsuzuki, T. and Wang, X. (2010) Nanoparticle Coatings for UV Protective Textiles. Research Journal of Textile and
Apparel, 14, 9-20.
[19] Sivakumar, A., Murugan, R., Sunderasan, K. and Periyasamy, S. (2013) UV Protection and Self Cleaning Finish for
Cotton Fabric Using Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research, 38, 285-292.
[20] Yadav, A., Prasad, V., Kathe, A.A., Raj, S., Yadav, D., Sundaramoorthy, C. and Vigneshwaran, N. (2006) Functional
Finishing in Cotton Fabrics Using Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Bulletin of Materials Science, 29, 641-645.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12034-006-0017-y
[21] Koziej, D., Fischer, F., Kranzlin, N., Caseri, W.R. and Niederberger, M. (2009) Nonaqueous TiO2 Nanoparticle Synthesis: A Versatile Basis for the Fabrication of Self-Supporting, Transparent, and UV-Absorbing Composite Films.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 1, 1097-1104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/am9000584
[22] Kathirvelu, S., Dsouza, L. and Dhurai, B. (2009) UV Protection Finishing of Textiles Using ZnO Nanoparticles. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research, 34, 267-273.
[23] Farouk, A., Textor, T., Schollmeyer, E., Tarbuk, A. and Grancacic, A.M. (2010) Sol-Gel-Derived Inorganic-Organic
Hybrid Polymers Filled with ZnO Nanoparticles as an Ultraviolet Protection Finish for Textiles. Autex Research Journal, 10, 58-63.
[24] Becheri, A., Drr, M., Nostro, P.L. and Baglioni, P. (2008) Synthesis and Characterization of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Application to Textiles as UV-Absorbers. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10, 679-689.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11051-007-9318-3
[25] Vigneshwaran, N., Kumar, S., Kathe, A.A., Varadarajan, P.V. and Prasad, V. (2006) Functional Finishing of Cotton
Fabrics Using Zinc Oxide-Soluble Starch Nanocomposites. Nanotechnology, 17, 5087-5095.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/17/20/008
[26] Shalaby, S.E., Abo El-Ola, S.M., AL-Blakocy, N.G., Beliakova, M.K. and Afify, H. (2013) Effect of Surface Activation Method of PET and PET/C Blended Fabrics on Its Functional Finishing with TiO2 Nanoparticles. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 9, 1731-1742.
[27] Ugur, .S., Sariiik, M. and Akta, A.H. (2010) The Fabrication of Nanocomposite Thin Films with TiO2 Nanoparticles by the Layer-by-Layer Deposition Method for Multifunctional Cotton Fabrics. Nanotechnology, 21, Article ID:
325603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/32/325603
[28] Li, H., Deng, H. and Zhao, J. (2009) Performance Research of Polyester Fabric Treated by Nano Titanium Dioxide (N
ano-TiO2) Anti-Ultraviolet Finishing. International Journal of Chemistry, 1, 57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijc.v1n1p57
[29] Xin, J.H., Daoud, W.A. and Kong, Y.Y. (2004) A New Approach to UV-Blocking Treatment for Cotton Fabrics. Textile Research Journal, 74, 97-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004051750407400202
[30] Montazer, M. and Pakdel, E. (2010) Reducing Photoyellowing of Wool Using Nano TiO2. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 86, 255-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2009.00680.x
[31] Shateri-Khalilabad, M. and Yazdanshenas, M.E. (2013) Fabrication of Superhydrophobic, Antibacterial, and Ultraviolet-Blocking Cotton Fabric. Journal of the Textile Institute, 104, 861-869.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2012.761330
[32] Duan, W., Xie, A., Shen, Y., Wang, X., Wang, F., Zhang, Y. and Li, J. (2011) Fabrication of Superhydrophobic Cotton
Fabrics with UV Protection Based on CeO2 Particles. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 50, 4441-4445.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie101924v
[33] Wang, L., Zhang, X., Li, B., Sun, P., Yang, J., Xu, H. and Liu, Y. (2011) Superhydrophobic and Ultraviolet-Blocking
Cotton Textiles. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 3, 1277-1281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/am200083z

100