Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 493 views

    Edited - Camporedondo vs. NLRC

    Uploaded by

    Ken Aliudin
    The petitioner, an employee of the Philippine National Red Cross (PNRC) for over 15 years, filed a complaint against the PNRC for illegal dismissal after being accused of misappropriating funds. The Supreme Court ruled that the PNRC remains a government corporation, and thus the petitioner was not entitled to file a labor case, but was instead covered under civil service laws as a government employee. The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Edited - Camporedondo vs. NLRC

    Uploaded by

    Ken Aliudin
    493 views1 page
    The petitioner, an employee of the Philippine National Red Cross (PNRC) for over 15 years, filed a complaint against the PNRC for illegal dismissal after being accused of misappropriating funds. The Supreme Court ruled that the PNRC remains a government corporation, and thus the petitioner was not entitled to file a labor case, but was instead covered under civil service laws as a government employee. The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

    Original Description:

    Edited - Camporedondo vs. Nlrc

    Original Title

    Edited - Camporedondo vs. Nlrc

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The petitioner, an employee of the Philippine National Red Cross (PNRC) for over 15 years, filed a complaint against the PNRC for illegal dismissal after being accused of misappropriating funds. The Supreme Court ruled that the PNRC remains a government corporation, and thus the petitioner was not entitled to file a labor case, but was instead covered under civil service laws as a government employee. The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    493 views1 page

    Edited - Camporedondo vs. NLRC

    Uploaded by

    Ken Aliudin
    The petitioner, an employee of the Philippine National Red Cross (PNRC) for over 15 years, filed a complaint against the PNRC for illegal dismissal after being accused of misappropriating funds. The Supreme Court ruled that the PNRC remains a government corporation, and thus the petitioner was not entitled to file a labor case, but was instead covered under civil service laws as a government employee. The court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's complaint for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    BALTAZAR CAMPOREDONDO vs.

    NLRC Philippine National Red Cross is a government


    corporation with anoriginal charter, having been
    G.R. No. 129049 August 6, 1999 created by Republic Act No. 95.

    FACTS: Petitioner filed an appeal but the NLRC denied


    the petition and upheld Labor arbiters decision
    Petitioner was employed with the PNRC since that dismissed petitioners complaint for lack of
    1980, and until his early retirement on jurisdiction.
    December 15, 1995. He was administrator of the
    Surigao del Norte Chapter. ISSUE:
    On July, 1995, a field auditor of thePNRC
    conducted an audit of the books of account of Whether the Philippine National Red Cross (PNRC
    the Surigao del Norte Chapter headed by for short) is a government owned and controlled
    petitioner and found him short in the total sum corporation or it has been impliedly converted to
    of P109,000.00. a private organization?

    Dr. Celso Samson, Secretary General of the PNRC HELD:


    wrote petitioner requiring him to restitute within
    seventy two hours from notice, the totalsum of Philippine National Red Cross (PNRC) is a
    P135,927.78 representing cash shortage, government owned and controlled corporation,
    technical shortage and unremittedcollections. with an original charter under Republic Act No.
    95, as amended. The test to determine whether
    Upon filing his early retirement, he wrote a letter a corporation is government owned or
    to Dr. Samson requesting for a re-audit by an controlled, or private in nature is simple. Is it
    independent auditor of his accounts. However, created by its own charter for the exercise of a
    Dr.Samson denied the request. public function, or by incorporation under the
    general corporation law? Those with special
    Because of denying his request petitioner filed charters are government corporations subject to
    with the National Labor Relations Commission a its provisions, and its employees are under the
    complaint for illegal dismissal, damages and jurisdiction of the Civil Service Commission,
    underpayment of wages against the Philippine and are compulsory members of the
    National Red Cross and its keyofficials. Government Service Insurance System.

    Respondent Philippine National Red Cross filed The PNRC was not "impliedly converted to a
    with the Surigao del Norte provincial office, private corporation" simply because its charter
    Department of Labor and Employment, a motion was amended to vest in it the authority to
    todismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction secure loans, be exempted from payment of all
    over the subject matter of the case because the duties, taxes, fees and other charges.
    PNRC is a government corporation whose
    employees are members of the Government Having served in the Philippine National Red
    Service Insurance System, and embraced within Cross for a number of years since his initial
    the Civil ServiceLaw and regulations. employment, he must know that it is a
    government corporation with its own charter and
    Petitioner filed an opposition to the Motion to that he was covered by compulsory membership
    Dismiss arguing that there was between the in the Government Service Insurance System,
    PNRC and its duly appointed paid staff, an which is why he could apply, as he did, for
    employer-employee relationship governed by the "early" retirement from the service under
    Labor Code. Presidential Decree No. 1146 or Republic Act No.
    1616.
    The Labor Arbiter issued an order dismissing the
    complaint for lack of jurisdiction, finding that the

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy