Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 50 views

    Logistic Regression: Case Processing Summary

    Uploaded by

    Nabila Saribanun
    This document summarizes the results of a logistic regression analysis examining factors that predict hypertension. It provides information on case processing, variable coding, classification tables, odds ratios, and tests of model fit. Key results include that high consumption of saturated fat and normal salt intake significantly predict hypertension, while physical activity was not a significant predictor when added to the model. The analysis identified a model with two significant predictors that correctly classified 95% of hypertension cases and 45.5% of non-hypertension cases.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Logistic Regression: Case Processing Summary

    Uploaded by

    Nabila Saribanun
    50 views4 pages
    This document summarizes the results of a logistic regression analysis examining factors that predict hypertension. It provides information on case processing, variable coding, classification tables, odds ratios, and tests of model fit. Key results include that high consumption of saturated fat and normal salt intake significantly predict hypertension, while physical activity was not a significant predictor when added to the model. The analysis identified a model with two significant predictors that correctly classified 95% of hypertension cases and 45.5% of non-hypertension cases.

    Original Description:

    hj

    Original Title

    datamm

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes the results of a logistic regression analysis examining factors that predict hypertension. It provides information on case processing, variable coding, classification tables, odds ratios, and tests of model fit. Key results include that high consumption of saturated fat and normal salt intake significantly predict hypertension, while physical activity was not a significant predictor when added to the model. The analysis identified a model with two significant predictors that correctly classified 95% of hypertension cases and 45.5% of non-hypertension cases.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    50 views4 pages

    Logistic Regression: Case Processing Summary

    Uploaded by

    Nabila Saribanun
    This document summarizes the results of a logistic regression analysis examining factors that predict hypertension. It provides information on case processing, variable coding, classification tables, odds ratios, and tests of model fit. Key results include that high consumption of saturated fat and normal salt intake significantly predict hypertension, while physical activity was not a significant predictor when added to the model. The analysis identified a model with two significant predictors that correctly classified 95% of hypertension cases and 45.5% of non-hypertension cases.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as rtf, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 4

    Logistic Regression

    Case Processing Summary


    Unweighted Casesa N Percent
    Selected Cases Included in Analysis 31 100.0
    Missing Cases 0 .0
    Total 31 100.0
    Unselected Cases 0 .0
    Total 31 100.0

    a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of


    cases.

    Dependent Variable Encoding


    Original Value Internal Value
    Ya 0
    Tidak 1

    Categorical Variables Codings


    Parameter
    coding
    Frequency (1)
    Aktivitas_Fisik Ya 16 1.000
    Tidak 15 .000
    Konsumsi_Garam Tinggi 18 1.000
    Normal 13 .000

    Classification Tablea,b
    Predicted
    Hipertensi Percentage
    Observed Ya Tidak Correct
    Step 0 Hipertensi Ya 20 0 100.0
    Tidak 11 0 .0
    Overall Percentage 64.5

    a. Constant is included in the model.


    b. The cut value is .500

    Variables in the Equation


    B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)
    Step 0 Constant -.598 .375 2.536 1 .111 .550

    Variables not in the Equation


    Score df Sig.
    Step 0 Variables Konsumsi_Garam(1) 6.639 1 .010
    Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh 7.682 1 .006
    Aktivitas_Fisik(1) 4.045 1 .044
    Overall Statistics 12.041 3 .007
    Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)
    Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
    Chi-square df Sig.
    Step 1 Step 13.372 3 .004
    Block 13.372 3 .004
    Model 13.372 3 .004
    Step 2a Step -.881 1 .348
    Block 12.492 2 .002
    Model 12.492 2 .002

    a. A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares


    value has decreased from the previous step.

    Model Summary
    Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R
    Step -2 Log likelihood Square Square
    1 26.952a .350 .481
    2 27.833a .332 .456

    a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because


    parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

    Hosmer and Lemeshow Test


    Step Chi-square df Sig.
    1 3.762 5 .584
    2 .116 2 .944

    Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test


    Hipertensi = Ya Hipertensi = Tidak Total
    Observed Expected Observed Expected
    Step 1 1 10 9.389 0 .611 10
    2 3 3.399 1 .601 4
    3 2 1.521 0 .479 2
    4 1 1.843 2 1.157 3
    5 2 2.692 3 2.308 5
    6 1 .617 1 1.383 2
    7 1 .540 4 4.460 5
    Step 2 1 13 12.828 1 1.172 14
    2 4 4.172 3 2.828 7
    3 2 2.172 2 1.828 4
    4 1 .828 5 5.172 6

    Classification Tablea
    Predicted
    Hipertensi Percentage
    Observed Ya Tidak Correct
    Step 1 Hipertensi Ya 18 2 90.0
    Tidak 6 5 45.5
    Overall Percentage 74.2
    Step 2 Hipertensi Ya 19 1 95.0
    Tidak 6 5 45.5
    Overall Percentage 77.4
    a. The cut value is .500

    Variables in the Equation

    B S.E. Wald df Sig.


    Step 1a Konsumsi_Garam(1) -1.578 1.057 2.227 1 .136
    Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh 2.266 1.023 4.904 1 .027
    Aktivitas_Fisik(1) -1.000 1.073 .869 1 .351
    Constant -2.420 1.469 2.715 1 .099
    Step 2a Konsumsi_Garam(1) -2.004 .966 4.303 1 .038
    Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh 2.221 .991 5.016 1 .025
    Constant -2.609 1.439 3.287 1 .070

    Variables in the Equation


    95% C.I.for EXP(B)
    Exp(B) Lower Upper
    Step 1a Konsumsi_Garam(1) .206 .026 1.639
    Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh 9.640 1.297 71.625
    Aktivitas_Fisik(1) .368 .045 3.011
    Constant .089
    Step 2a Konsumsi_Garam(1) .135 .020 .895
    Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh 9.213 1.320 64.324
    Constant .074

    a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Konsumsi_Garam, Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh, Aktivitas_Fisik.

    Model if Term Removed


    Model Log Change in -2 Sig. of the
    Variable Likelihood Log Likelihood df Change
    Step 1 Konsumsi_Garam -14.648 2.344 1 .126
    Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh -16.304 5.656 1 .017
    Aktivitas_Fisik -13.916 .881 1 .348
    Step 2 Konsumsi_Garam -16.334 4.835 1 .028
    Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh -16.772 5.711 1 .017

    Variables not in the Equation


    Score df Sig.
    Step 2a Variables Aktivitas_Fisik(1) .902 1 .342
    Overall Statistics .902 1 .342

    a. Variable(s) removed on step 2: Aktivitas_Fisik.

    FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh
    /ORDER=ANALYSIS.

    Case Processing Summary


    Cases
    Valid Missing Total
    N Percent N Percent N Percent
    Hipertensi *
    31 100.0% 0 0.0% 31 100.0%
    Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh

    Hipertensi * Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh Crosstabulation


    Konsumsi_Lemak_Jenuh
    Ya Tidak Total
    Hipertensi Ya Count 17 3 20
    Expected Count 13.5 6.5 20.0
    Tidak Count 4 7 11
    Expected Count 7.5 3.5 11.0
    Total Count 21 10 31
    Expected Count 21.0 10.0 31.0

    Chi-Square Tests
    Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
    Value df sided) sided) sided)
    Pearson Chi-Square 7.682a 1 .006
    b
    Continuity Correction 5.618 1 .018
    Likelihood Ratio 7.657 1 .006
    Fisher's Exact Test .013 .009
    N of Valid Cases 31

    a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.55.
    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy