AN ENIGMATIC INDO-EUROPEAN RITE:

PAEDERASTY *
JAN BREMMER

$1. Problem: One of the intriguing features of the Greeks is their

active interest in homosexuality.' On the whole scholars have been rather
reserved in tackling this problem, but in the course of time different so-
lutions have been proposed of which two may be singled out as having
received the most support in recent decades. First, the presence of homo-
sexuality is seen as a consequence of the militaristic way of Greek life and
parallels have been drawn with cases of homosexuality among soldiers
during the second World Second, it is seen as a rite of initiation and
parallels are adduced from initiatory rites of various "primitive" peoples.'
The second solution evidently is the more convincing one, since it
at least accounts for the fact that socially approved homosexuality in
Greece was virtually restricted to paederasty - an affair between adults and
boys -- and was not an affair between two adult males. Yet the adherents
of this solution have not analysed the structure of Greek paederasty in
any depth nor attempted an explanation of this puzzling phenomenon and
they have ignored the existence of Indo-European (henceforth: I-E)
parallels. For these reasons, while adopting this solution as a working
hypothesis, it will be the aim of this article to take a fresh look at the
problem of Greek paederasty, paying especially attention t o the I-E
evidence, as is appropriate in this special issue. As the Ionians had no
proper initiatory ritual, at least not since the Archaic Age, we consequently
cannot demonstrate that in their case paederasty belonged to the rites of
initiation. Therefore we shall mainly restrict our analysis to the Dorian
material, but elsewhere we hope to demonstrate that particularly the ex-
tensive Athenian evidence can only be understood as a development and
transformation of an older form of paederasty which was still to be found
among the ~ o r i a n s . ~

92. Approach: Since progress in the analysis of the I-E rites of initi-
ation has primarily been made by comparing them to "primitive" ones,
we shall first look at the practice of paederasty during "primitive" initi-
ations. Unfortunately, these rites are always guarded in secrecy and the
acts of copulation seemingly (understandably?) even more so. Yet, we

279
ARETHUSA Vol. 13 (1980) 2.
 Jan Bremmer

nappen to have a fairly detailed description of the practice among the

Papuans of the Trans-Fly by the late English social anthropologist F. E.
~ i l l i a m s , 'who visited the area a number of times between 1926 and 1932.
Williams tells us:

It was frequently maintained that setiriva, or bachelors,

remained truly celibate until they entered upon sexual relations
with their own wives. Without giving too much credence to
this statement, we may note that the hospitable exchange
above noted was nominally restricted to married adults.
Some informants maintained that seririva could secure the
favours of married women at feast times, but it seems evident
that this was not definitely sanctioned.
The bachelors had recourse to sodomy,6 a practice
which was not reprobated but was actually a custom of the
country - and a custom in the true sense, i.e., fully sanc-
tioned by male society and universally practised. For a long
time the existence of sodomy was successfully concealed from
me, but latterly, once I had won the confidence of a few in-
formants in the matter, it was admitted on every hand. It
is actually regarded as essential to the growing boy to be
sodomized. More than one informant being asked if he had
ever been subjected to unnatural practice, answered, 'Why,
yes! Otherwise how should I have grown?'
The ceremonial initiation to sodomy and the mytho-
logical antecedents to it will be spoken of elsewhere (pp.
194, 308). In the meantime it is enough to note that every
male adult in the Morehead district has in his time constantly
played both parts in this perversion. The boy is initiated to it
at the bull-roarer ceremony and not earlier, for he could
not then be trusted to keep the secret from his mother. When
he becomes adolescent his part is reversed and he may then
sodomize his juniors, the new initiates to the bull-roarer. I
am told that some boys are more attractive and consequently
receive more attention of this kind than do others; but all
must pass through it, since it is regarded as essential to
their bodily growth. There is indeed no question as to the
universality of the practice.
It is commonly asserted that the early practice of
sodomy does nothing to inhibit a man's natural desires when
An Enigmatic Indo-European Rite: Paederasty 28 1

later on he marries; and it is a fact that while the older men

are not debarred from indulging, and actually do so at the
bull-roarer ceremony, sodomy is virtually restricted as a
habit to the setiriva.

This description is confirmed (or at least not contradicted) by other

ones and we can thus note the following four points as being important
features of the practice:
1) Paederasty is indeed a part of at least some "primi-
tive" initiations and should not be confused with homo-
sexuality, since both initiators and novices will afterwards
normally enter the married state.
2) Copulation, in which the novice is always the
passive partner, takes place anally.'
3) The active paederasts are last-time novices. Brelich
(93) already observed that the novices of the previous turn
usually play a prominent r61e in giving instruction, as in
Sparta (Calame I, 392), and in keeping discipline. We shall
see below whether paederasty is connected with either of
these two activities.
4) There is some uneasiness about the whole affair,
since it is kept secret.
These four points we shall take as a guiding-line in our analysis of the I-E
evidence. At first sight such an investigation hardly looks promising. Our
knowledge of the I-E rites of initiation is still (and perhaps always will be)
rather restricted,' and the conversion to Christianity, which considered
homosexuality a most serious vice,9 would early have suppressed the
practice, wherever it may have existed among the peoples of Western and
Eastern Europe. And yet, there is some evidence which, perhaps not un-
surprisingly, has been analysed insufficiently. Our contribution can
hardly be more than a first exploration of this material, since no study of
the I-E evidence has been made so far, but it will at least present more
material than can be found anywhere else.
In the actual analysis we shall proceed as follows. First, we shall
present the material, then we shall give an evaluation and finally attempt
an explanation of the phenomenon of paederasty in the rites of initiation.
282 Jan Bremmer

53. Survey: Since no information seems to be available about the

early 1ndians,l0 we pass straight on to the Persians. Our sources are di-
vided as to whether they practiced paederastyI1 or not.I2 The latter view
will be the more probable one, since the Zoroastrian writingsI3 time and
again strongly forbid paederasty. It is perhaps indicative for this attitude
that Agesilaos, although strongly in love with the son of a high-ranking
Persian, refrains from any physical contact.14 On the other hand, the son
of Pharnabazus is enamoured of a Greek boy,15and the recurrence of the
prohibitions of paederasty suggests that the Persians did not succeed in
stopping the practice.
Such discrepancy between theory and practice could elucidate the
remark of ~ e r o d o t u s 'that
~ the Persians learned paederasty from the
Greeks. Apart from the problem as to how Herodotus or his source could
have possibly known this, we can reject this as utterly improbable since
paederasty is almost universal (Karsch-Haack, passim). Nevertheless, this
notice can still be valuable in a different way, for it seems characteristic
that peoples who themselves practice paederasty impute this to others.
Thus the Athenians called paederasty "doing it the Spartan way"" or the
"Chalcidian way";l8 ~ l a u t u s 'calls
~ a paederast an "Ionian" and the
Albanians (below) called the gypsies paederasts. The information of
Herodotus would fit into this pattern: his source may well have been
Persians who felt uneasy about the practice and wanted to disclaim re-
sponsibility for their fellow countrymen's behavior. It seems reasonable
then to accept the occurrence of paederasty among the Persians - although
it was forbidden - but our sources do not connect the practice with
initiation or men's societies.20
As regards Greece we will start with the Spartans, looking specifi-
cally for the different points enumerated in 52. The existence of a close
connection between initiation and paederasty is demonstrated by the words
of xenophonz1in his discussion of the Spartan agogi? "I think I ought to
say something also about intimacy with boys, since this matter also has a
bearing on education @aideian)." The fact is confirmed by plutarchZ2
who adds that at the age of twelve the boys received lovers who were
chosen from the reputable young men (neoi). This institutionalized rBle
of the paederasty also clearly appears from the fact that the ephors penalized
those who, although qualifying, did not have a beloved.23
A rather complicated problem is the Spartan mode of copulation.
~ e n o ~ h elaborately
o n ~ ~ tells us:

If someone, being himself an honest man, admired a boy's

An Enigmatic Indo-European Rite: Paederasty

soul and tried 'to make of him an ideal friend without re-
proach and to associate with him, he approved, and be-
lieved in the excellence of this kind of training. But if it was
clear that the attraction lay in the boy's outward beauty, he
banned the connexion as an abomination; and thus he
purged the relationship of all impurity, so that in iucedaemon
it resembled parental and brotherly love. I am not surprised,
however, that people refuse to believe this. For in many states
the laws are not opposed to the indulgence of these ap-
petites.

The apologetic tone of Xenophan suggests that he was making a conces-

sion to the changing taste of his Athenian since our Athenian sources
on the whole thought ~ t h e r w i s e A
. ~ ~comedian (Dover 187) even coined
the word kuso1akonanus- artan an,"^' which leaves little to the imagination,
but from a methodological point of view it is dubious, as Dover (194)
rightly stresses, to accept without reflection the Athenian allegations
against Sparta. For the comedians, our principal source, were more con-
cerned with good jokes than with faithfully reporting other peoples'
customs. ~ e t h e , ~in' a celebrated article, suggested another piece of
evidence. According to him the Spartan word for the male lover, e i ~ ~ n e l a s , ~ ~
should be explained as "in-blower" of seed. Yet, there is absolutely no
proof whatsoever that the Spartans understood it this way and therefore
his explanation must remain pure conjecture. Strictly speaking we can-
not but conclude that there does not exist any certainty about the Spartan
way of copulation.
Yet, this is unduly sceptical, for we know with certainty that on
the island of Thera, a Spartan colony, the relations were not at all Platonic.
A graffito of the early sixth century reads: "By (Apollo) Delphinios, Krimon
here copulated with a boy, brother of ~ a t h ~ k l e s This
. " ~ ~graffito had al-
ready been adduced as evidence by Bethe3' and ~ e a n r n a i r ebut, ~ ~it is only
recently that we are properly able to understand its significance. Three
important points should be made. First, the existence of anal copulation
can hardly be doubted. Second, the invocation of Apollo Delphinios points,
as Fritz Graf (13) has shown, to a connection with initiation. Third, Dover
(123) has rightly pointed out that the person who wrote this graffito in-
tended slander. This must mean that, as in Athens (Dover 146), so also
in this community some people felt uneasy about paederasty.
We complete our Dorian picture with the description ~ ~ h o r o s ~ ~
gives of paederasty in Crete:
284 Jan Bremmer

They (i.e., the Cretans) have a peculiar custom in regard to

love affairs, for they win the objects of their love, not by
persuasion, but by capture (harpagE); the lover tells the
friends of the boy three or four days beforehand that he is
going to make the capture; but for the friends to conceal the
boy, or not to let him go forth by the appointed road, is indeed
a most disgraceful thing, a confession, as it were, that the
boy is unworthy to obtain such a lover; and when they meet, if
the abductor is the boy's equal or superior in rank or other
respects, the frietrds pursue him and lay hold of him, though
only in a very gentle way, thus satisfying the custom (to
nornimon); 2nd after that they cheerfully turn the boy over
t o him to lead away; if, however, the abductor is unworthy,
they take the boy away from him.34 And the pursuit does
hot end until the boy is taken to the men's house (andreion)
of his abductor. They regard as a worthy object of love, not
the boy who is exceptionally handsome, but the boy who
is dceptionally manly and decorous. After giving the boy
presents, the abductor takes him away to any place in the
country he wishes; and those who are present at the capture
follow after them and after feasting and hunting with them
for two months (for it is not permitted to detain the boy for
a longer time), they returd to the city. The boy is released
after receiving as presents a military habit, an ox, and a
drinking cup (these are the gifts required by law, nomon),
and other things so numerous and costly that the friends, on
account of the number of the expenses, make contributions
thereto. Now the boy sacrifices the ox to Zeus and feasts those
who returned with him; and then he makes known the facts
about his intimacy with his lover, whether perchance, it has
pleased hin'i or nbt, the law (tzomou) allowing him this privi-
lege in order that, if any force was applied to him at the time
of his captute, he might be able at this feast to avenge himself
and be rid of the lover. It is dikgraceful for those who are
handsome in appeArance and also are descendants of il-
lustrious ancestors to fail to obtain lovers. . . . So much for their
customs (nomima) in regard to love affairs.

Before we look at the paederasty in particular we will first analyse this

ritual in genetal. The whole affair starts with an obvious agreement between
An Enigmatic Indo-European Rite: Paederasty 285

the lover, whose age remains unspecified, and the friends of the boy: they
guide the boy to an agreed place where the lover will be waiting. Such a set-up
is typical for the start of the initiation and finds its exact parallel in "primi-
tive" initiation^.^' The term Ephoros uses for the capture, hnrpagF, was
evidently a terminus technicus, for it is also used for the capture of
Chrysippus by ~ a i u and s ~ of
~ Ganymedes by ~ e u s . "
The boy offers a token resistance and the pursuit ends in his lover's
andreion, which shows that the ritual was sanctioned by the community,
since the andreion was the public mess." Here the boy received presents the
size of which may have depended on the status difference between the
lover and himself. It is typical of the archaic character of this ritual that
presents play such an important r81e.j9 First, the boy received presents in
the andreion, then he received presents from his own friends and his lover
at the end of his "bushtime" and finally he in turn feasted "those who
return with him." This last gesture finds its close parallel in the academic
custom that the promovendus gives a dinner to his supervisor and others
who have helped him after having received his doctorate, a custom still
existing in Germany and Holland at the present day and going back to the
earliest Middle ~ ~ e s . ~ '
After the presents were given the whole group spent two months in
the country, eating and hunting. Hunting is the activity par excellence to
prove the valor of the initiand4' and as such an important part of the
"primitive" initiations (Brelich 77) and initiatory scenario's in fairy
tales.42On their return to the city the lover, with the financial help of the
boy's friends, presented the boy with a military suit, an ox and a wine-cup.
What, we may ask, is the relevance of these presents? The present of the
military suit evidently meant that the boy had now become a man, for in
Thebes the lover made his beloved a present of such a suit when he regis-
tered as a man.43The ox reminds us of the lifting of the bull by Theseus
and the Athenian adolescents, the ephehes: a connection with the final
stage of the initiation (Graf 14f.). But why the cup? The only thing known
about the cup is that in Gortyn it resembled a r h e r i k l e i o ~a, ~cup
~ used in
symposia.4s ~ e r n e considers
t~~ it to be an "instrument de libation et
'objet prkcieux'," but this is hardly enough. It was a present prescribed by
law which indicates that it must have had a more central meaning. Evidently
the military suit and the ox were closely connected with the final stage of the
initiation and it seems therefore reasonable to look for such asignificance for
the cup, too. ~ e r n e t ~himself
' had already pointed to the Oenisteria, a
ceremony for the moment the ephebes have their long hair cut off, i.e., when
they enter the final stage of the transition from adolescence into adulthood.
286 Jan Bremmer

In this ceremony they offer a cup to Heracles and give a drink to their
companions, presumably at their own cost as Gernet persuasively suggests,
which reminds us of the meal offered by the Cretan initiand.
Why this connection between drinking and the final stage of the
initiation? Drinking wine played an important part in the existence of Greek
men as appears from the central place of the This is even
reflected in the way in which Greeks looked at neighboring peoples, for
whereas Greeks themselves drank mixed wine, they ascribed the drinking
of unmixed wine, milk, or water to others. In many Greek cities women
were forbidden to drink wine.49 In Rome women,50slaves5' and, for our
problem very important, young men until the age of thirtySZ were prohibited
from drinking wine. It seems therefore reasonable to conclude that the
present of the drinking-cup meant admission as a qualified member to
the world of adult rneaS3
The assumption that young men were not yet allowed to drink
wine probably also explains the fact that among the Romans wine-pourers
were youths of noble birth.S4We find a similar function for youths of Greece
such as the young noblemen at Greek symposia,ss the son of ~ e n e l a u s , ' ~
the young ~uripides:~~ a r i c h o s ~ (the
' brother of Sappho), the boys at the
Ephesian festival for ~ o s e i d o nand, ~ ~the wine-pourers of ~ l e x a n d e r ~
and
'
P y r r h ~ s : ~the
' fact that they had to pour out the wine but were not al-
lowed to drink it stressed the difference of status between them and the
adult men.
The mythical counterpart of these boys is Ganymedes, the wine-
pourer of Zeus. The place in the Troad where Zeus supposedly captured him
was significantly called ~ a r ~ a(above), ~ i a but
~ ~in the Cretan version the
abductor was Minos, although the name of the place remained the same:
~ a r ~ a ~ iThe a sChalcidians,
. ~ ~ on the other hand, claimed that the capture
happened in their territory at a place called Harpagion, and there has
indeed recently been found a statue of Ganymedes in their area.64It was
precisely this Ganymedes who was the beloved of Zeus, as numerous testi-
monia tell
Finally it is important to note that being captured by a lover was a
must, since it was considered a disgrace not to have one.66It is therefore
completely understandable that Plutarch calls the practice the "so-called
capture" (harpagrnd~).~~
As we turn from ritual back to paederasty as such, two points may
be observed. First, paederasty in Crete is clearly part of the initiatory ritual.
Second, the whole ritual is subjected to the supervision of society as a
whole, as can be inferred from the frequent occurrence of the words
An Enigmatic Indo-European Rite: Paederasty 287

nomos and nomimon in the report of Ephoros. Unfortunately, the lengthy

report does not inform us of the other features of the practice in which we
are interested. And yet, we are not altogether without additional data.
Regarding the age of the erastFs, "lover," we are informed by an
anecdote related by ~ e l i a n u s . ~A' Cretan wamor, who had a boy of noble
birth as his paidika - one of the Greek terms for the beloved (Dover 16f.) -
stumbled during a fight over a dead body and fell. When an enemy wanted
to strike him in the back the man exclaimed: "Do not deal me a shameful
and cowardly blow, but strike me in in the breast, in order that my
loved one may not judge me guilty of cowardice and refrain from laying out
my dead body" (tr. Scholfield [Loeb]). The wamor is called a neanias,
"young man," which nicely agrees with what we were led to expect on ac-
count of the "primitive" and Spartan evidence.
What about the nature of copulation? Again, we have no direct
information but it seems to fit in with the other evidence that a poem
glorifying the derri6re of a boy is written by the Cretan ~ h i a n o s . ~As '
regards the existence of ambiguous feelings about paederasty we have no
information.

The Cretan relationships were felt to be rather shocking by the

7
Romans ' and an embarrassed Nepos7' notes: "In Crete it is considered
praiseworthy for the young men to have as many lovers as possible." The
Romans even thought that paederasty was one of the main causes for the
Greek en~lavement.~'Yet, Valerius ~ a x i m u spresents ~~ a number of
stories, the earliest going back to the fourth century, demonstrating that
the practice was known to the Romans too, albeit disapproved of till the
end of the Republic. By that time, paederastic friendships were frequently
adopted in higher circles and even the moralistic Augustus had had his
friend in his younger years.75About the Empire we need not go into detail.
Any reader of Juvenal, Martial and Petronius can find examples galore.
However, during the Republic one case of homosexuality occurred
which deserves special attention. From Livy's account of the suppression
of the Bacchanalia scandal in 186 B.C., we learn that adolescents, when
being initiated in the Bacchic mysteries, had to submit to a homosexual
act,76 a submission untestified for the Greek Dionysiac mysteries."
e ~ ' rejected the notice as slander. Even if this is the case, sorne-
~ e s t u ~ i k r has
thing which has to remain undecided in the absence of other testimonies,
the report would still be valuable in showing the existence, on the level of
collective representations, of the connection between initiation and sub-
mission to a homosexual act.79
288 Jan Bremmer

It is important to observe that the Romans explicitly forbid paederasty

s
with free boys but not with slaves 0 in the so-called lex Scantinia, a law
dating probably from before Cicero's time." The practice was evidently
considered to be a humiliating one and thus fit only for slaves. The active
r61e in the relationship, however, was beyond reproach, as follows from
the fact that orators, such as Gaius ~ r a c c h u s 'and ~ ~ i c e r o , ~only
' slan-
dered their opponents by suggesting a passive r61e in a paederastic rela-
tionship.
Regarding the there is general agreement in our sources that
they practiced paederasty. ~thenaeus" even tells us that they often slept
with two boys at the same time, but this looks as if it is a typical Greek
dream-wish. This is the only detailed report we have that goes beyond the
pure mention of the practice and the possibility cannot be excluded that
it is just one of those features ascribed by the Greeks to the Randvolker to
contrast them unfavourably with themse~ves.'~Early Irish and Welsh
literature has no mention of the practice at all."
To the ancient Germans also paederasty was ascribed. We may
suspect that for those sources that do not give any precise information8'
the same attitude as regards the Celts exists, but there are others which
deserve a closer inspection. ~ a c i t u s 'tells
~ us that those who are corpore
infames were thrown into a marsh. This points to a contempt of homosexuals.
g0
Tacitus gives no other precise information, but from the Icelandic sagas
we learn that this contempt is directed exclusively at the passive partner
in a homosexual r e l a t i o n ~ h i ~How
. ~ ' the Germans imagined this relation-
ship clearly appears from the words of Skeggi in the Gisla saga (c.2) when
directing a carpenter to make wooden figures of Gisli and Kolbjorn: "and
have one stand close behind the other; and the nastiness of that will always be
there to shame them" (tr. G. Johnston).
For our purpose two other texts are of great importance. ~ r o c o ~ i u s ~ ~
relates of the Hemli that they practiced homosexuality. It is evident that he
pictures the Heruli as a kind of exceptionally bad rogues? and the possi-
bility therefore cannot be excluded that this is just pure slander. On the other
hand we must note that the Heruli practiced a kind of initiation, for we
also learn from ~ r o c o ~ i uthat s ~ a~ distinction existed between the lords
and the youths whom he calls douloi, literally "slaves." The young men
had to fight without a shield and only received one after having demonstrated
their courage. Otto ~ 6 f l e already
r ~ ~ noted that the word "slave" must have
a special meaning, and recently ~ i d e n g r e nhas ~ ~succeeded in giving a
proper explanation. He showed that terms such as "slave, servant, etc.,"
when used for young men and warriors, are typical of the Gefolgschafls-
An Enigmatic Indo-European Rite: Paederasty 289

wesen, itself often a development of the men's so~ieties.~' The Hemli

evidently were in the process of such a development, since the obligation
to show courage is typical for novices. Since the Hemli knew a kind of
initiation, it is quite possible to assume that paederasty constituted a part
of it, but in the light of Procopius' aversion of them this must remain un-
certain; not so, however, our next case.
Ammianus a arc ell in us^^ tells us that among the Taifali, a tribe con-
nected with the ~ o t h s , the ' ~ boys lived in a state of paederasty until they
had killed a boar or a bear. The killing of a boar was a typical heroic
ordeal,Iw and had also initiatory value in Macedonia, where a man could
only recline at dinner, i.e., have the status of an adult, when he had speared
a boar without a hunting-net. The rule was still retained in Alexander's
time, since Cassander had to sit at the table at the age of thirty-five, because
he had not yet speared his boar.lOlAs the paederastic relationship continued
only till the boy reached adulthood, it seems reasonable to consider this
case similar to those we have observed with the Greeks, although Germanic
scholars have consistently tried to explain it away or have considered it
slander. Io2
We have now arrived at our final example. In 1894 Von ~ a h n " '
noted a strong resemblance between the Dorian customs and those in
Albania. This is a highly important observation - although, except for
~ e t h e , ' " no attention has been paid to it - since, if anywhere in Europe
archaic customs remained alive till nearly the present day, it was precisely
in this highly remote and mountainous10s area.lo6 The paederastic rela-
tionships were between boys from the age of twelve and adolescents from
the age of sixteen: a striking resemblance with the "primitive" and Dorian
relationships. Unfortunately, we are not told whether the practice was sup-
posed to have educational goals, but the relationship was sanctioned by
society: the pair of lovers together took the eu~harist.'~'
As regards the other features in which we are interested, there is one
other, if curious, source. In 1904 the folklorist F. R. Krauss started a journal
for scientific study of scatology which was only sold to libraries and re-
sponsible scholar^.'^" In this journal he also published, besides countless
erotic stories, lists of erotic vocabulary of most of the European countries.
From a list of Albanian wordslogI take the following: "biithar = paederast
(literally: 'Arschman')." The word may speak for itself. Another extract
from the list makes apparent the Albanian attitude towards paederasty:
"madziip, eig. = Zigeuner; davon die Albeitungen madzupi = Paderastie;
madzupoj = Paderastie iiben." Whereas the Albanians were themselves
convinced paederasts they denounced the gypsies for paederasty. This
290 Jan Bremmer

ambiguous attitude is also apparent in Von Hahn's report, since his source,
a young Albanian, assured him that the relationships were fully Platonic,
whereas the great Balkanologist weigandl10 could assure Bethe that nothing
was further from the truth! It seems reasonable then to recognize in Albanian
paederasty the same pattern as we have found among "primitive" and
Dorian initiations.

4. Evaluation: Comparing the Greek, Germanic and Albanian

evidence we can note the following points. Among the Greeks and ancient
Germans paederasty belonged to the transitional period into adulthood,
as was the case among the Albanians. Among the Greeks and Albanians
the active paederasts were young men, if not adolescents. Anal copulation
seems certain for Greeks and Albanians, and, considering the attitude of
the ancient Germans regarding passive homosexuals, it seems reasonable
-
to postulate that adult men would not have acted thus which suggests
that the young boys had to submit to the passive r61e. Ambiguous feelings
we have noted for Greeks and Albanians, and among the ancient Germans,
a strong condemnation of passive homosexuality.
Admittedly, our material is scarce, but all the evidence we have
coincides to a striking degree with the features we noted for "primitive"
paederasty during initiation. For that reason it seems not unreasonable to
arrive at the conclusion that paederasty, like other features of "primitive"
initiation, once constituted a part of the I-E initiation. Having accepted this
conclusion, we shall now proceed to attempt an explanation of the practice.

95. Explanation : It is sometimes forgotten that our I-E evidence in

fact constitutes the oldest historical evidence for initiatory practices, on
the whole about 2500 years earlier than much ethnographic material. Our
"primitive" material concerning paederasty is exclusively restricted to
Melanesia, New Guinea and neighbouring regions,"' a marginal area
compared with the rest of the world, where we can expect to find the more
archaic features of social institutions. Consequently, paederasty will belong
to the oldest historical strata of the initiatory ritual.
From the evidence presented it seems clear that often mixed feelings
exist about the practice. In addition we should note that, if a distinction is
made between the passive and the active rde, it is the passive r6le which is
considered to be despicable, a feeling which indeed seems to be very wide-
spread."*
An Enigmatic Indo-European Rite: Paederasty 291

Why, however, is it the passive r61e which is despised and not the
active one? Here, I suggest, we can be helped by a socio-biological a p
proach. This is, admittedly, a new branch of the social sciences, and its
results are still a source of profound dis~ension,"~ but some insights can
hardly be refuted. One of these insights is of special importance for our
theme. The German ethologist I. ~ i b l - ~ i b e s f e l d thas
" ~ noted: "Bei sehr
vielen Saugern reiten Mannchen zur Rangdemonstration agressiven
Characters auf Artgenossen des gleichen Geschlechts auf." Fehling
(18-27), in an excellent discussion of the subject, has collected many his-
torical examples of this kind of Rangdemonstration, which continued to
exist up to the recent past, especially as a penalty for intruders or adulterers.
I shall therefore confine myself to one example, albeit a ritualized one,
which is not mentioned by Fehling. In a reviewl15of a study of the notorious
Attica revolt in 1972 we are told that

long before the showdown, while observers swore to the

hostages' safety, wild stories multiplied baroquely in the
peaceful New York countryside of rape and sexual humili-
ations (!) and castration inflicted on the hostages. The stories
were not true; but they prepared the guards for 'retaliatory'
sexual fiendishness when the prisoners were retaken - one
was prodded back to his cell with a screwdriver up his rectum.
No doubt the guards who did this, or watched it being done,
thought it a mild and fitting return for all the outrages that
had filled their dreams during those four days when few people
slept easy around Attica.

Now Rangdemonstration is exactly the feature which we would expect in

the initiatory ritual, since the novices have to be shown their modest place
in the hierarchy, and to that end they are continually humiliated. As Ray-
mond ~ i r t h "notes
~ concerning Tikopia initiation: "The suppression of
the individual, the disregard of his normal freedom of choice is important.. .;
at initiation, he must submit." This accent on obedience can be found in
Greece too. Both ret tan"' and spartan"' initiation stress obedience and
the young boys are likened to unruly foals which have to be dome~ticated."~
This, in turn, explains why we found that the active paederasts were the
novices of the previous initiation, for they, as we have seen above, were
charged with the keeping of discipline.
On the other hand, the fact that the passive r61e was considered to
be humiliating will explain the early disappearance of the practice among
292 Jan Bremmer

the Indo-Iranians and the Romans. As soon as the initiation proper dis-
appeared or became transformed, the practice of paederasty must have
come under heavy censure, which normally will have led to its disappear-
ance.
Our explanation then has accounted for all the features of paederasty
during the initiation. However, it would be less than fair if we did not point
out that other scholars have approximated this explanation. Already in
1909 (!) Arnold van ~ e n n e p " ' compared what he termed the homosexual
practices of Melanesian novices with those of Greek ephebes. More re-
cently Lionel ~ i ~ e rhesitantly
'~' suggested a connection between the oc-
currence of homo-erotic practices during initiation and the mounting by
dominant male primates of subdominant ones. This aspect was elaborated
in a detailed way by Fehling (21), but the Greek parallel escaped him.
We would like to close this article with an observation on method in
I-E studies. Georges ~ u m ~ z once i l ' ~scornfully
~ rejected the use of Melane-
sian parallels, as adduced by my compatriot Wagenvoort, to acquire a
better understanding of the Roman terms gravitas and maiestas. Yet, our
analysis has, I believe, demonstrated that such a comparison can (though
it need not) be useful. Both cultures represent more archaic stages of human
civilization at a time when cultures were less differentiated in themselves
and from one another as compared with more modem times. Similarly,
Karl ~ e u l i ' had
~ ) succeeded in explaining many features of Greek sacri-
ficial ritual by a comparison with another marginal culture: the Siberian
hunting peoples. A corollary therefore suggests itself: that I-E scholars
ought not to restrict themselves to studying only the I-E material, but must
ever be prepared to look for explanations to "primitive" materials as well,
in particular the practices of more marginal societies.

APPENDIX
INITIATION AND LESBIAN LOVE

~ l u t a r c h relates
' ~ ~ that in Sparta the noble women loved the girls.
Also the Academic philosopher ~ a ~ n o nstates: ' ~ ' "Among the Spartans
it was customary (viz. for adult women) to have intercourse with girls before
their marriage, as one did with boys." And Calame (11) has shown that
some poems of ~ l c m a nclearly' ~ ~ show a connection between initiation of
the girls and Lesbian love. It may therefore be considered proven that
male paederasty in Sparta had a Lesbian relationship as its counterpart
An Enigmatic Indo-European Rite: Paederasty 293

in female initiation. In the case of ~ a p p h othe

' ~ same
~ ritual background is
still visible.
However, when looking at the quite extensive "primitive" evidence
of Lesbian love, as collected by Karsch-Haach (449-511). or at general
discussions of female initiation12*we do not find any parallel for Spartan
behavior. This may be due to the secretive nature of the female ritual,
which in any case has yet to be properly analyzed. But it may well be the
case that in Greece Lesbian love in initiation developed after the analogy
with male paederasty. Indicative of such a development seems to be the
fact that the term for the female beloved, is taken from the male
sphere. Unfortunately, our data are too scarce for any further detailed in-
vestigation.

The Center for Hellenic Studies

Washington, D.C.

NOTES
* I would like to thank all those scholars who kindly answered my requests for information,
Fritz Graf for his comments, and Rolf Bremmer for the revision of my English. I also thank
Professor H. T. Wallinga and his seminar for their critical attention to my first exposition of
these views.
The following studies will be quoted by their author's name only: F. Karsch-Haack,
Das gleichgeschlechtliche Leben der Natur9olker (Miinchen 1911); A. Brelich, Paides e
parrhenoi (Rome 1969); D. Fehling, Ethologische b5erlepngen auf dem Gebiet der Alter-
tumskunde (Miinchen 1974); C. Calame, Les choeurs de jeunesfilles en grkce archaique (Rome
1977); K . J. Dover, Creek Homosexuality (London 1978); "Apollon Delphinios," Mutefun
Helveticum 36 (1979) 2-22.

I The best survey of the evidence, with an excellent bibliography. is Dover. Although his
study is full of excellent Einzelbeobachtungen, it does not succeed in presenting a coherent
picture. Moreover, it is rather unhistorical, entitling the chapter on the Dorians, by all ac-
counts the more archaic tribe, "Changes."
Cp. Dover 185; see, e.g., H. -I. Marrou, Histoire de Pkducation dons Pantiquit?, 1948' (Paris
1965~)63.
' See especially Brelich 35, 84f., 120f.; Calame 1, 421 / 7.
In this yet unpublished study I shall discuss relationships such as those between Socrates
Alcibiades, which are, as I hope to demonstrate, a development of the paederastic ones.
' F. E. Williams, Papuans of the Trans-Fly (Oxford 1969') 158f.
Surely by anal copulation; cp. Williams (309) on the mythological first occasion: "Gambadi
informants describe the initial occasion more vividly. The father bids his son stoop to drink
and as he does so catches him at a disadvantage."
294 Jan Bremmer

This is also observed by Brelich 85. There seems to be one exception; cp. H. P. Duerr,Traum-
zeit (Frankfort 1978) 89: ". . . bei der Initiation auf einer kleinen melanesischen Insel legen
sich die envachsenen Manner auf den Bauch und bieten den Initianten ihren After dar." Un-
fortunately, the author does not give any specific reference which would enable us to de-
termine the meaning and place of this behavior.
a See the survey by M. Eliade, Rites and Symbols of Initiation. 1958' (New York 1965) 81-136,
The Quest (Chicago 1969) 118-123. Important studies which have appeared since are
especially Widengren (see below, note 96). Brelich and Calame. For "primitive" initiations,
cp. Eliade, op. cit.; Brelich 13-1 12, with an excellent survey of the individual motifs of the
initiation; V. Popp (ed.), Initiation. Zeremonien der Staturiinderung und des Rollenwechsels
(Frankfurt / M 1969); M. Vizedom, Rites and Relationshipr Rites of Passage and Con-
temporary Anthropology. Sage Research Papers in the Social Sciences 4 (1976).
Cp. H. J. Kuster, Over homosexualiteit in middeleeuws West-Europa (Diss. Utrecht 1977);
M. Goodich, The Unmentionable Vice: Homosexuality in the Loter MedievalPeriod (London
1979).
lo Cp. R. Schmidt, Liebe und Ehe imalten und modernen Indien (Berlin 1904). I owe this ref-

erence to Professor J. Gonda.

" Her. 1.135, Sext. Emp. P. 1.152.
" Plato Symp. 182b; Curt. 10.1.26; Amm. Marc. 23.6.76.
l 3 Vendidld 8.32; Didistan 70.7; Denkart 8.35.13; E. Westermarck, The Origin andDevelop

ment of the Moral Ideas (London 1908) 11, 486f.

l 4 Xen. Hell. 4.1.39f.; Hell. Oxy. 21.4 Bart; Plut. Ages. 11; Max. Tyr. 19.5.

Is Plut. Ages. 13.

l 6 Her. 1.135.

" Hesch. A 224 and 226; Suda A 62.

Hesch. X 85 Schmidt; Suda X 42.
Plaut. Stich. 769.
20
Professor Geo Widengren, letter 10 / 22 / 79.
" Xen. Loc. 2.12, tr. Marchant (Loeb).
22
Plut. Lyc. 17.1.
23
Ael. VH. 3.10.
24
Xen. Loc. 2.13, tr. Marchant (Loeb). This Platonic view of Spartan paederasty is shared by
Cic. Rep. 4.4; Max. Tyr. 20.8.
21
Cp. E. N. Tigerstedt, The Legend of Sparta in Classical Antiquity I (Stockholm 1965) 164,
460.
26
Cp. J. Henderson, The Maculate Muse (New Haven / London 1975) 218 n. 37 (all references).
21
Cp. Henderson (above, note 26) 131 n. 123: "kusos = anus (Hsch.) is used by comic poets
only of the male anus and only in the abuse of paederasts."
" E. Bethe, "Die dorische Knabenliebe," RhM 62 (1907, 438475) 460 / 4.
29
For eispnelas (or -0s) and eispnein, cp. Theocr. 12.13 and schol. ad lor.; Call. fr. 68Pf.; Plut.
Ag. 24 and Cle. 3; Ael. VH. 3.12; Choerob. in Theod. 166.33; Et. Gen. sv. eispneles; EM 43.3 1
and 306.22.
IG XII.537.
"
32
Bethe (above, note 28) 449f.. 453.
H. Jeanmaire, Couroi et couri.tes (Lille 1939) 456-460.
33
Ephoros FGH 70 F149 (= Strabo 10.4.21), tr. Jones (Loeb, slightly amended).
34
This must mean that the friends can hardly have been the ones of the lover, as is supposed
An Enigmatic Indo-European Rite: Paederasty 295

by L. Gernet, Anthropologie de la grhce antique (Paris 1068) 193 and Jones in his translation.
" See my observations in M. J. Vermaseren (ed.). Studies in Hellenistic Religions. EPRO 78
(Leiden 1979) 15f.
l6 Athenaeus 13.603A; Apollod. 3.3.5. According to Praxilla (fr. 751P). who uses the same

term, Zeus carried him off.

l7 Ibycus fr. 289P; Thgn. 1347.

" Graf 11. with all references; add A. J. Beattie, Kodmos 14 (1975) 43-47.
Iq For the dynamics of gift-giving, cp. M. Mauss, The Gifr. 1925' (London 1954); E. Benveniste,

Le vocabulaire des institutions indo-europtennes (Paris 1969) I , 65-79; J. v. Baal, Reci-

procity and the Position of Women (Amsterdam 1975) 11-69.
Cp. J. Le Goff, Pour un outre Moyen Age (Paris 1977) 147 n. I: "coutume, t r k ancienne."
" Cp. A. Schnapp, "Pratiche e immagini di caccia nella Grecia antica," DArch NS 1 (1979)
3659. For the hunt as a preparation for war, cp. K. Meuli, Gesammelte Schrflen (Basel
1975) 11, 699-729 ("Ein altpersischer Kriegsbrauch").
42 V. Propp. Le radici storiche dei racconti di fate. 1946' (Torino 1972) 189f.

4 9 ~ u tM.. 761B.
Athen. 11.502B.
4s Athen. 11.470 / 2.
46
Gemet (above, note 34) 190.
47
Gemet, loc. cit.; F. T. van Straten, "The Lebes of Heracles," Bulletin Antieke Beschaving
54 (1979) 189-91.
48
Cp. J. Tmmpf, "ijber das Trinken in der Poesie des Alkaios," ZPE 12 (1973), 139-160;
P. v. d. Miihll, Ausgewahlte kleine Schrften (Basel 1975) 483-505.
49
On the whole subject of wine, see the fundamental study by F. Graf, Milch. Honig und Wein.
Zum Verstandnis der Libation im griechischen Rituol. in Perennitos, Studi in memoria di
Angelo Brelich (Rome 1980). For waterdrinking neighbours, see also the ancient Germans
(Athen. 4.153E). Thracians (Plato Leg. 637E) and the, regards the mainland of Greece,
marginal Euboeans (Apollodoms fr. 281K). The theme of the waterdrinking Scythians
(Antiphanes fr. 35K) is again taken up by Asterius hom. XIV.ll Datema, but the topos
has not been recognized by 0. J. Maenchen-Helfen, Die Welt der Hunnen (Wien 1978) 144,
who sees in the notice a reference to the behavior of the contemporary Huns.
50
Cp. M. Durry, "Les femmes et le vin," REL 33 (1955). 108-113. In Montaillou also the
women are excluded from the drinking of wine, which looks like a survival of this custom;
cp. E. Le Roy Ladurie, Montaillou, villoge occitan de 1294 b 1324 (Paris 1975) 282.
Athen. 10.429B.
12
Athen. 10.429B. Ael. VH. 2.38 states as age thirty-five.
" A connection between drinking and initiation also existed in ancient Scandinavia; cp. M.
Cahen, htudes sur le vocabulaire religieux du vieux-scandinave: la libation (Paris 1921) 38.
The theme deserves a wider investigation.
" Athen. 10.425A.
" Schol. 11. 20.234.
56
Od. 15.141; note also 11. 1.470.
57 Theophr. fr. 119; Hieronymus fr. 28 Wehrli.
58
Sappho fr. 203LP = 203 Voigt.
" Amerias apud Athen. 10.424F.
60
D.S. 12.14.5.
Plut. Pyrr. 5.
 Jan Bremmer

62 Strabo 13.1.11.
63 Echemenes FGH 459 FI; Dosiadas FGH 458 F5.
" Athen. 13.601F, op. P. G. Themelis, M A 2 (1969) 163-165.
65 Cp. H. Sichtermann, Ganymed: Myrhus und Gestalt in der Antiken Kunst (Berlin 1952); see

more recently M. Bonghi Jovino, "Una tabella Capuana con ratto di Ganimede." in Hom-
mages b M. Renard 3 (Brussel 1969) 66-78; G. Schwarz, "Iris und Ganymed auf attischen
Vasenbildern," JoAI 51 (1976 / 7) 1-10; S. Kaempf-Dimitriadou, "Zeus und Ganymed auf
einer Pelike des Hemonax," AK 22 (1979) 49-54.
66 Cp. Athen. 11.782B; Cicero apud Sew. Aen. 10.325.

67 Plut. M. I IF.

" Ael. HA. 4.1.

69
For wounds in the front as honorable ones, cp. D.S. 15.33.6; Plut. Ant. 43, Cat. Ma. 1,
Crass. 1I. Pel. 4.
lo AP. 12.38.

" Nep. Pro. 4.

l2 Plut. M.274D.

" Val. Max. 6.1.7ff.

74
For Romans and paederasty, cp. M. H. E. Meier / L. R. de Pogey-Castries, Hisroire de
ramour grec dnns Ponriquift (Paris 1952) 177-200, and F. Goufroy, Un fait de civilisorion
mtconnw I'homosexualitt masculine h Rome (unprinted 'Thtse IIIe cycle,' Poitiers 1972).
75 Cp. J. Griffin, "Augustan Poetry and the Life of Luxury," JRS 66 (1976) 86-105, esp. 100 /

2. I owe this reference and the one to Nepos to Nicholas Horsfall.

l6 Liv. 39.10.8 and 39.13.10.

77 Cp. W. Burkert, Griechische Religion der archaischen und klassischen Epoche (Stuttgart

1977) 435f.
78
A. J. Festugitre, krudes de religion grecque et hellinistique (Paris 1972) 98.
l9 We may compare the stereotyped connection between cannibalism and secret societies, cp.

W. Burkert, Homo necans (Berlin /New York 1972) 47, and N. Cohn,Europe's InnerDemons
(London 1975) passim.
'O Plut. M. 288A.

" Cp. F. Miinzer, RE IIA (1923) 352. The fullest collection of sources is J. Oehler on Tert.
Monog. 12.
Plut. CG. 4.4.
83
Cp. F. Goufroy, "HomosexualitC et I'idCologie esclavagiste chez Cidron," DHA 4 (1978)
219-262.
84 Arist. Pol. 2.6.6; Posidon. FGH 87 F116 (=D.S. 5.32.7); Strabo 4.4.6; Pto. Tetr. 2.3; Bar-

desanes liber Iegum regionum, p.592f. Nau = (in Greek translation) Eus. PE. 6.10.
85
Athen. 33.6038.
86 For this practice, cp. S. Pembroke, "Women in Charge: the function of Alternatives in Early

Greek Tradition and the Ancient Idea of Matriarchy," JCWI 30 (1967) 1-36; I. Chirassi-
Colombo, "The role of Thrace in Greek Religion," Thracia I1 (Sofia 1974) 71-80; M.
Detienne, Dionysos mis b morr (Paris 1977) 133-160.
Brinley Rees, letter 12 / 5 / 79.
88
Sext. Emp. P. 3.199; Bardesanes (above, note 84).
89
Tac. G e m 12.
90
Cp. Anonymous, "Spuren von kontrtirsexualittit bei den alten Skandinaviern," Jahrb. f:
sex. Zwischensrufen 4 (1907) 244-263.
An Enigmatic Indo-European Rite: Paederasty 297

91 Cp. N. Beckman, Ett stiille hos Tocitus (Germ. c. 12). Nord. Tidss. f. filologi IV 9 (1920)
103-108; J. Weisweiler, IF41 (1923) 16-27; 0. Hbfler, Kultische Geheimbiindeder Germonen
(Frankfurt / M 1934) 268.
92
Prowp. Goth. 2.14.
93 Cp. L. Schmidt, Die Ostgermonen (Miinchen 19412)548-564.

" Prowp. Pers. 2.25.

9s Hofler, Kultische Geheimbiinde, 267-269.
96
G. Widengren, Der Feudolismus im olten Iron (Koln 1969) 9-44, 50f.
97
Cp. S. Deger-Jalkotzy, Eqe-to. Zur Rolle des Gefolgschoftswesensin der Soziolstruktur
mykenischer Reiche (Wien 1978), with an excellent survey of the I-E evidence (118-212).
98
Amm. Marc. 31.9.5: Honc Toifolorumgentem turpem oc obscenoe vitoeflogitiis it4 accepimus
mersom, ut opud eos nefondi concubitus foedere copulentur moribus puberes, aetotis viri-
ditotem in eorum pollutis usibus consumpturi. Porro siqui iom odultus aprum exceperit solus.
vel interemerit ursum immonem. collrrvione liberotur incesti.
99 Schmidt, Ostgermanen, 546 / 8.

I" H. Beck, Das Ebersignum im Germonischen (Berlin 1965) 154-176.

lo' Hegesandros opud Athen. 1.18A.

Io2 Cp. K. Zeuss, Die Deutschen und die Nochborstamme (Miinchen 1837) 435; R. Pallmann.
Knoppen bei den Germanen in der Zeit der Volkenvonderung,Forschungen m r Deutschen
Geschichte 3 (1863) 229-236; Hbfler, Kultische Geheimbiide. 268; Schmidt, Ostgennanen,
548.
101
J. G. v. Hahn, Albanesische Studien (Jena 1854) 166-168.
IM Bethe. Dorische Knobenliebe, 475.

lo' For mountainous areas as retaining archaic c-atoms, cp. F. Braudel, Lo Mkditerronke et le

monde mkditerronken b l'kpoque de Philippe II(Paris 1966) I, 30-34; P. Burke, PopulorCulture

in Early Modem Europe (London 1978) 31f.
'06 This is stressed by virtually every study of Albania. Fora useful bibliography, cp.1. Whitaker

opud I. M. Lewis (ed.), History ond Sociol Anthropology (London 1968) 288-293.
101
P. Nacke, "iiber Homosexualitat in Albanien," Johrb. f: sex. Zwischenstufen 9 (1908,
327-337) 328. Unfortunately, this article is less informative than the title suggests. Dr. Peter
Bartl kindly supplied me with an English version: "On Homosexuality in Albania," Intern.
Journ. of Greek Love 1 (1965) 39-47.
108
Cp. H. L i e l d , "Anthropophyteia," in K. Ranke (ed.), Enzyklopadie des Mijrchens I
(Berlin / New York 1977) 596-601.
109
Cp. "Erotisch-skatologisches Glossar der Albanesen," Anthropophyteio 8 (1911) 35-39.
110
Weigand opud Bethe, Dorische Knobenliebe, 475.
111
As can be inferred from Karsch-Haach 91-115; Brelich 85; A. Dundes, Mon 11 (1976). 233f.
112
Cp. Westermarck (above, note 13) 475-477; A. Dundes et a/., "The strategy of Turkish
Boys' Verbal Dueling Rhymes," Am. J. Folklore 83 (1970) 325-349; V. L. Bullough, "Homo-
sexuality as Submissive Behavior," J. Sex Research 9 (1973) 283-288 (with interesting
examples from ancient Egypt); Dover 105.
' I 3 See, e.g., M. Sahlins, The Use and Abuse of Biology (Ann Arbor 1976);M. Ruse, Sociobiology:

Sense or Nonsense (Dordrecht 1979).

"'Eibl-Eibesfeldt, quoted by Fehling 18.
"' G. Wills, New York Review of Books, 3.4. (1975) p.4.
! I 6 R. Firth, We the Tikopio (London 1959) 466.

I" Ephoros loc. cit. = Strabo 10.4.20.

 Jan Bremmer

Plut. Lyc. 16 and Cle. 9.

119
Calame I, 374f; add Plut. Ages. I.
A. v: Gennep, The Rites of Passage, 1909' (1960) 171.
"I L. Tiger, Men in Groups, 1969' (London 1971) 147.
122'
G. DumCzil, "Maiestas et gravitas: de quelques dimrences entre les Romains et les Aus-
tronCsiensV(!), RPh 26 (1952) 7-28 = (slightly abbreviated but with a new preface) Idles
romaines (Paris 1969) 125-152. Wagenvoort's reply (Mnem. IV 5 [I9531 287-306) is re-
printed in H. Wagenvoort, Pietas. Selected Studies in Roman Religion = "Studies in Greek
and Roman Religion" 1 (Leiden 1980) 39-58.
123
K. Meuli, Gesammelte Schrifren (Basel 1975) 11, 907-1021.
'14 Plut. Lyc. 18.

12' Hagnon apud Athen. 13.602D. 1 follow Calame (I.434), as against G. Devereux, SO 42

(1968) 83f. (who is followed by Dover 188), in not seeing in this text anal intercourse of
boys with girls.
126
Alcman fr. 1 and 3P.
Calame 11, 94-97; see also R. Merkelbach, "Sappho und ihr Kreis," Philologus 101 (1957)
1-29 = C. Calame (ed.), Rito e poesia orale in Grecia (Rome 1977) 123-136,214f.; B. Gentili,
La veneranda Saffo, QUCC 2 (1966) 37-62 = Calame, Rito, 139-155, 216-220.
''' Cp. A. Winterstein, "Die Pubertltsriten der Madchen mit deren Spuren in Marchen,"
Imago 14 (1928) 199-274; J. K. Brown, "A cross-cultural study of female initiation rites,"
Am. Anthrop. 65 (1963) 837-853; D. Visca, Le iniziazioni femminili: un problem4 de recon-
siderare, Religioni e civilita 2 (1976) 241-274; N. J. Girardot, "Initiation and Meaning in
the Tale of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs," Am. J. Folklore 90 (1977) 274-300.
129
References: Calame I, 435 n.173.