0% found this document useful (0 votes)
142 views2 pages

Science Fair Report Rubric

This rubric evaluates science fair projects across several categories including the title page, abstract, table of contents, literature review, hypothesis, experiment details, graphs/charts, analysis, conclusion, recommendations, acknowledgements, and works cited. Projects are scored on a scale from emerging to mastery in each category based on criteria such as including all required elements, using proper formatting, demonstrating logical thinking, and applying information to answer the original question. The highest scoring projects meet all criteria with clear and thorough explanations.

Uploaded by

api-350211422
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
142 views2 pages

Science Fair Report Rubric

This rubric evaluates science fair projects across several categories including the title page, abstract, table of contents, literature review, hypothesis, experiment details, graphs/charts, analysis, conclusion, recommendations, acknowledgements, and works cited. Projects are scored on a scale from emerging to mastery in each category based on criteria such as including all required elements, using proper formatting, demonstrating logical thinking, and applying information to answer the original question. The highest scoring projects meet all criteria with clear and thorough explanations.

Uploaded by

api-350211422
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Science Fair Report Rubric

Emerging Proficient Mastery Score


Title Page (5) Present, No Name, No Capitalization in Capitalization in
/5
No Capitalization. Title OR Missing title, 28pt font,
(1) full name (3) Name, Punct. (4-5)
Abstract (10) Missing parts, Far Less than page or page to 1 page,
less than page, not more than 1 page, Includes full
a summary of full Includes most summary. (8-10)
experiment. (1-5) summary but /10
missing key parts
(hypothesis, data,
conclusion) (5-7)
Table of Contents (5) No #s, out of order, Present, Missing Present, good
Missing >3 parts (1- some numbers or 1- format, pages, /5
2) 2 parts (3-4) include all parts (5)
Literature Review (15) 1 page or less, no Clear format (intro, Clear Format,
flow between body, conclusion), background
No I paragraphs, no not applicable info, knowledge is
citations (1-5) citations but in applicable to /15
wrong format, 1-1 experiment, proper
pages. (6-10) in text citations, @
least 2 pages (11-15)
Hypothesis (10) Present, lack of logic Not If___ and I___ If___ and I ___
just guess, or not then___, but logical then___,
answering question and answers Falsifiable, answers /10
(1-4) question. (5-8) question with logic
(9-10)
Experiment Details Missing steps Lists materials, List materials,
(15) unclear to follow, rough procedure procedure specific
not exact difficult but can be with measurements,
No I measurements/ followed, needs repeat of /15
amounts, No more specifics, or experiment. (11-15)
repetition of repeat only once (6-
procedure. (1-5) 10)
Graphs/Charts (10) Not sufficient data, Missing some titles, Titles (main and
no titles, AND not but has others, needs axis), color if
No I formatted to show color to read (not in needed, formatted to
/10
trends. (1-5) color), OR not show trends. (9-10)
formatted to show
trends (6-8)
Analysis (10) Not applicable to Applies to data, Applies to presented
presented data, just some logic but data, logical, shows
/10
No I restating data no mostly just restates thought not just
meaning (1-5) data (6-8) repeating data (9-10)
Conclusion (10) Same as analysis, no Answer but not to Answers specific
final answer. (1-5) tested question. question. States
No I Adjusts answer to whether experiment /10
hypothesis. (6-8) supports hypothesis
or not. (9-10)
Recommendations (5) Missing (0) Slightly applicable Applicable to real
No I to real life or future. life or future, goes
/5
Could go more in into depth (4-5)
depth (1-3)
Acknowledgements (5) Missing (0) Present, not in Present in complete /5
complete sentences sentences (5)
(4)
Works Cited Not APA format or APA, 3 or more APA, 3 or more
<3 sources (1-2) sources, but sources valid sources. /5
questionable (3-4)
Total /105

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy