Latestcswip3 160825063830
Latestcswip3 160825063830
Latestcswip3 160825063830
Level 2
WIS5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Examination Records
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
7 Materials Inspection
7.1 General
7.2 Material types and weldability
7.3 Alloying elements and their effects
7.4 Material traceability
7.5 Material condition and dimensions
7.6 Summary
8 Codes and Standards
8.1 General
8.2 Definitions
8.3 Summary
9 Welding Symbols
9.1 Standards for symbolic representation of welded joints on drawings
9.2 Elementary welding symbols
9.3 Combination of elementary symbols
9.4 Supplementary symbols
9.5 Position of symbols on drawings
9.6 Relationship between the arrow and joint lines
9.7 Position of the reference line and weld symbol
9.8 Positions of the continuous and dashed lines
9.9 Dimensioning of welds
9.10 Complimentary indications
9.11 Indication of the welding process
9.12 Weld symbols in accordance with AWS 2.4
10 Introduction to Welding Processes
10.1 General
10.2 Productivity
10.3 Heat input
10.4 Welding parameters
10.5 Power source characteristics
11 Manual Metal Arc/Shielded Metal Arc Welding (MMA/SMAW)
11.1 Manual metal arc welding (MMA) basic equipment requirements
11.2 Power requirements
11.3 Welding variables
11.4 Summary of MMA/SMAW
12 TIG Welding
12.1 Process characteristics
12.2 Filler wires
12.3 Tungsten inclusions
12.4 Crater cracking
12.5 Common applications
12.6 Advantages
12.7 Disadvantages
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Examination Records
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
13 MIG/MAG Welding
13.1 Process
13.2 Process variables
13.3 MIG welding basic equipment requirements
13.4 Inspection when MIG/MAG welding
13.5 Flux-cored arc welding (FCAW)
13.6 Summary of solid wire MIG/MAG
14 Submerged Arc Welding
14.1 Process
14.2 Fluxes
14.3 Process variables
14.4 Storage and care of consumables
14.5 Power sources
15 Thermal Cutting Processes
15.1 Oxy-fuel cutting
15.2 Plasma arc cutting
15.3 Arc air gouging
15.4 Manual metal arc gouging
16 Welding Consumables
16.1 Consumables for MMA welding
16.2 AWS A 5.1 and AWS 5.5-
16.3 Inspection points for MMA consumables
16.4 Consumables for TIG/GTA welding (GTAW)
16.5 Consumables for MIG/MAG welding
16.6 Consumables for SAW welding
17 Weldability of Steels
17.1 Introduction
17.2 Factors that affect weldability
17.3 Hydrogen cracking
17.4 Avoiding solidification cracking
17.5 Lamellar tearing
17.6 Weld decay
17.7 Weld decay (sensitisation)
18 Weld Repairs
18.1 Weld repairs can be divided into two specific areas
19 Residual Stresses and Distortions
19.1 Development of residual stresses
19.2 What causes distortion?
19.3 What are the main types of distortion?
19.4 What are the factors affecting distortion?
19.5 Distortion prevention by pre-setting, pre-bending or use of restraint
19.6 Distortion prevention by design
19.7 Distortion prevention by fabrication techniques
19.8 Distortion corrective techniques
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Examination Records
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
20 Heat Treatment
20.1 Introduction
20.2 Heat treatment of steel
20.3 Postweld heat treatment (PWHT)
20.4 PWHT thermal cycle
20.5 Heat treatment furnaces
21 Arc Welding Safety
21.1 General
21.2 Electric shock
21.3 Heat and light
21.4 Fumes and gases
21.5 Summary
22 Calibration
22.1 Introduction
22.2 Terminology
22.3 Calibration frequency
22.4 Instruments for calibration
22.5 Calibration methods
23 Application and Control of Preheat
23.1 General
23.2 Definitions
23.3 Application of preheat
23.4 Control of preheat and interpass temperature
23.5 Summary
24 Practical Visual Inspection
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Appendix 5
www.twitraining.com
Section 1
Guidance and basic requirements for visual inspection are given by:
1-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Typical Duties of Welding Inspectors
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Access
Access of the surface, for direct inspection, should enable the eye to be:
600mm (max.)
30 (min.)
1-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Typical Duties of Welding Inspectors
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Welding gauges (for checking bevel angles and weld profile, fillet sizing,
measuring undercut depth).
Dedicated weld gap gauges and linear misalignment (hi-lo) gauges.
Straight edges and measuring tapes.
Magnifying lens (if a magnification lens is used it should be X2 to X5).
However, BS EN 970 says that the extent of examination and the stages
when inspection activity is required, should be specified by the Application
Standard or by agreement between client and fabricator.
For fabricated items that must have high integrity, such as pressure vessels
and piping or large structures inspection, activity will usually be required
throughout the fabrication process:
Before welding.
During welding.
After welding.
1-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Typical Duties of Welding Inspectors
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
In practice the application of the fabricated item will be the main factor that
influences what is judged to be good workmanship or the relevant client
specification will determine what the acceptable level of workmanship is.
A welding inspector should also ensure that any inspection aids that will be
needed are:
In good condition.
Calibrated as appropriate/as specified by QC procedures.
1-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Typical Duties of Welding Inspectors
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Check Action
Material In accordance with drawing/WPS.
Identified and can be traced to a test certificate.
In suitable condition (free from damage and contamination).
WPSs Have been approved and are available to welders (and
inspectors).
Welding equipment In suitable condition and calibrated as appropriate.
Weld preparations In accordance with WPS (and/or drawings).
Welder qualifications Identification of welders qualified for each WPS to be used.
All welder qualification certificates are valid (in date).
Welding consumables Those to be used are as specified by the WPSs, are
stored/controlled as specified by the QC procedure.
Joint fit-ups In accordance with WPS/drawings tack welds are to good
workmanship standard and to code/WPS.
Weld faces Free from defects, contamination and damage.
Preheat (if required) Minimum temperature is in accordance with WPS.
Check Action
Site/field welding Ensure weather conditions are suitable/comply with Code
(conditions will not affect welding).
Welding process In accordance with WPS.
Preheat (if required) Minimum temperature is being maintained in accordance with
WPS.
Interpass temperature Maximum temperature is in accordance with WPS.
Welding consumables In accordance with WPS and being controlled as procedure.
Welding parameters Current, volts, travel speed are in accordance with WPS.
Root run Visually acceptable to Code before filling the joint (for single
sided welds)
Gouging/grinding By an approved method and to good workmanship standard.
Inter-run cleaning To good workmanship standard.
Welder On the approval register/qualified for the WPS being used.
1-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Typical Duties of Welding Inspectors
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Check Action
Weld identification Each weld is marked with the welder's identification and is
identified in accordance with drawing/weld map.
Weld appearance Ensure welds are suitable for all NDT (profile, cleanness, etc).
Visually inspect welds and sentence in accordance with Code.
Dimensional survey Check dimensions are in accordance with drawing/Code.
Drawings Ensure any modifications are included on as-built drawings.
NDT Ensure all NDT is complete and reports are available for records.
Repairs Monitor in accordance with the procedure.
PWHT (if required) Monitor for compliance with procedure (check chart record).
Pressure/load test Ensure test equipment is calibrated.
(if required) Monitor test to ensure compliance with procedure/Code.
Ensure reports/records are available.
Documentation records Ensure all reports/records are completed and collated as
required.
The form of this record will vary, possibly a signature against an activity on
an inspection checklist or on a quality plan, or it may be an individual
inspection report for each item.
For individual inspection reports, BS EN 970 lists typical details for inclusion
such as:
Name of manufacturer/fabricator.
Identification of item examined.
Material type and thickness.
Type of joint.
Welding process.
Acceptance standard/criteria.
Locations and types of all imperfections not acceptable (when specified,
it may be necessary to include an accurate sketch or photograph).
Name of examiner/inspector and date of examination.
1-6
www.twitraining.com
Section 2
Brazing
A process of joining generally applied to metals in which, during or after
heating, molten filler metal is drawn into or retained in the space between
closely adjacent surfaces of the parts to be joined by capillary attraction. In
general, the melting point of the filler metal is above 450C but always below
the melting temperature of the parent material.
Braze welding
The joining of metals using a technique similar to fusion welding and a filler
metal with a lower melting point than the parent metal, but neither using
capillary action as in brazing nor intentionally melting the parent metal.
Joint
A connection where the individual components, suitably prepared and
assembled, are joined by welding or brazing.
Weld
A union of pieces of metal made by welding.
Welding
An operation in which two or more parts are united by means of heat or
pressure or both, in such a way that there is continuity in the nature of the
metal between these parts.
2-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Type of
joint Sketch Definition
Butt joint A connection between the ends or
edges of two parts making an angle to
one another of 135-180 inclusive in the
region of the joint.
2-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
In a butt joint
In a corner joint
Autogenous weld
A fusion weld made without filler metal by TIG, plasma, electron beam, laser
or oxy-fuel gas welding.
Slot weld
A joint between two overlapping components made by depositing a fillet
weld round the periphery of a hole in one component so as to join it to the
surface of the other component exposed through the hole.
2-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Plug weld
A weld made by filling a hole in one component of a workpiece with filler
metal so as to join it to the surface of an overlapping component exposed
through the hole (the hole can be circular or oval).
Heterogeneous
Welded joint in which the weld metal and parent material have significant
differences in mechanical properties and/or chemical composition. Example:
A repair weld of a cast iron item performed with a nickel-based electrode.
Dissimilar
Welded joint in which the parent materials have significant differences in
mechanical properties and/or chemical composition. Example: A carbon
steel lifting lug welded onto an austenitic stainless steel pressure vessel.
2-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Filler metal
Metal added during welding, braze welding, brazing or surfacing.
Weld metal
All metal melted during the making of a weld and retained in the weld.
Fusion line
Boundary between the weld metal and the HAZ in a fusion weld, a non-
standard term for weld junction.
Weld zone
Zone containing the weld metal and the HAZ.
Weld face
The surface of a fusion weld exposed on the side from which the weld
has been made.
Root
Zone on the side of the first run furthest from the welder.
Toe
Boundary between a weld face and the parent metal or between runs.
This is a very important feature of a weld since toes are points of high
stress concentration and often are initiation points for different types of
cracks (eg fatigue and cold cracks). To reduce the stress concentration,
toes must blend smoothly into the parent metal surface.
2-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Weld
Parent zone
Weld
face metal
Parent
metal
Toe
HAZ
Weld
metal Root Fusion
line Excess weld
metal
Excess
weld metal
Parent metal
Excess weld
metal
Weld
Toe zone
Fusion line
Weld face
Root
Parent metal
Weld
Metal
HAZ
2-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Included angle
The angle between the planes of the fusion faces of parts to be welded. For
single and double V or U this angle is twice the bevel angle. In the case of
single or double bevel, single or double J bevel, the included angle is equal
to the bevel angle.
Root face
The portion of a fusion face at the root that is not bevelled or grooved. Its
value depends on the welding process used, parent material to be welded
and application; for a full penetration weld on carbon steel plates, it has a
value of 1-2mm (for the common welding processes).
Gap
The minimum distance at any cross-section between edges, ends or
surfaces to be joined. Its value depends on the welding process used and
application; for a full penetration weld on carbon steel plates, it has a value
of 1-4mm.
Root radius
The radius of the curved portion of the fusion face in a component prepared
for a single or double J or U, weld. When MMA, MIG/MAG or oxy-fuel gas
welding on carbon steel plates, the root radius has a value of 6mm for single
and double U preparations and 8mm for single and double J preparations.
Land
Straight portion of a fusion face between the root face and the curved part of
a J or U preparation can be 0. Usually present in weld preparations for MIG
welding of aluminium alloys.
2-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Angle of
bevel
Root face
Gap
Single V preparation
The V preparation is one of the most common preparations used in welding
and can be produced using flame or plasma cutting (cheap and fast). For
thicker plates a double V preparation is preferred since it requires less filler
material to complete the joint and the residual stresses can be balanced on
both sides of the joint resulting in lower angular distortion.
Double V preparation
The depth of preparation can be the same on both sides (symmetric double
V preparation) or can be deeper on one side (asymmetric double V
preparation). Usually, in this situation the depth of preparation is distributed
as 2/3 of the thickness of the plate on the first side with the remaining 1/3 on
the backside. This asymmetric preparation allows for a balanced welding
sequence with root back gouging, giving lower angular distortions. Whilst a
single V preparation allows welding from one side, double V preparation
2-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
requires access to both sides (the same applies for all double side
preparations).
Included angle
Angle of
bevel
Root
radius
Land
Root gap Root face
Land
Single U preparation
U preparation can be produced only by machining (slow and expensive),
however, tighter tolerances obtained provide for a better fit-up than with V
preparations. Usually it is applied to thicker plates compared with single V
preparation as it requires less filler material to complete the joint, lower
residual stresses and distortions. Like for V preparations, with very thick
sections a double U preparation can be used.
Double U preparation
Usually this type of preparation does not require a land, except for
aluminium alloys.
2-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
2-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Single J preparation
Double J preparation
2-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Actual throat
Design throat
thickness
thickness
As a general rule:
Actual throat
thickness = design
throat thickness
Run (pass)
The metal melted or deposited during one pass of an electrode, torch or
blowpipe.
Layer
A stratum of weld metal consisting of one or more runs.
2-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Leg length
Distance from the actual or projected intersection of the fusion faces and the
toe of a fillet weld, measured across the fusion face. Symbolised on
drawings with z.
Design throat
thickness Leg
Actual throat length
thickness
Leg
length
2-13
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
a = 0.707 z or z = 1.41 a
2-14
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Vertical leg
size
Throat size
2-15
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Weld slope
The angle between root line and the positive X axis of the horizontal
reference plane, measured in mathematically positive direction (ie counter-
clockwise).
Weld rotation
The angle between the centreline of the weld and the positive Z axis or a
line parallel to the Y axis, measured in the mathematically positive direction
(ie counter-clockwise) in the plane of the transverse cross-section of the
weld in question.
2-16
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Vertical-down
PF A welding position in which the
welding is downwards. PG.
2-17
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Terms and Definitions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
2.8 Weaving
This is transverse oscillation of an electrode or blowpipe nozzle during the
deposition of weld metal, generally used in vertical-up welds.
Stringer bead
A run of weld metal made with little or no weaving motion.
2-18
www.twitraining.com
Section 3
Welding Imperfections
and Materials Inspection
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
1 Cracks.
2 Cavities.
3 Solid inclusions.
4 Lack of fusion and penetration.
5 Imperfect shape and dimensions.
6 Miscellaneous imperfections.
3.2 Cracks
Definition
An imperfection produced by a local rupture in the solid state, which may
arise from the effect of cooling or stresses. Cracks are more significant than
other types of imperfection as their geometry produces a very large stress
concentration at the crack tip, making them more likely to cause fracture.
Types of crack:
Longitudinal.
Transverse.
Radiating (cracks radiating from a common point).
Crater.
Branching (group of connected cracks originating from a common crack).
3-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The cracks can be wide and open to the surface like shrinkage voids or sub-
surface and possibly narrow.
3-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
thermal shrinkage of the cooling weld bead can cause these to rupture and
form a crack.
It is important that the welding fabricator does not weld on or near metal
surfaces covered with scale or contaminated with oil or grease. Scale can
have a high sulphur content and oil and grease can supply both carbon and
sulphur. Contamination with low melting point metals such as copper, tin,
lead and zinc should also be avoided.
3-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Apply preheat (slows down the cooling rate and thus avoids the
formation of susceptible microstructures).
Maintain a specific interpass temperature (same effect as preheat).
Postheat on completion of welding (to reduce the hydrogen content by
allowing hydrogen to diffuse from the weld area).
Apply PWHT (to reduce residual stress and eliminate susceptible
microstructures).
Reduce weld metal hydrogen by proper selection of welding
process/consumable (eg use TIG welding instead of MMA, basic
covered electrodes instead of cellulose ones).
Use A multi- instead of singlerun technique (eliminate susceptible
microstructures by the self-tempering effect, reduce hydrogen content by
allowing hydrogen to effuse from the weld area).
Use a temper bead or hot pass technique (same effect as above).
Use austenitic or nickel filler (avoid susceptible microstructure formation
and allow hydrogen diffusion out of critical areas).
Use dry shielding gases (reduce hydrogen content).
Clean rust from joint (avoid hydrogen contamination from moisture
present in the rust).
3-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
3-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Lamellar tearing occurs only in rolled steel products (primarily plates) and its
main distinguishing feature is that the cracking has a terraced appearance.
3-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Two main options are available to control the problem in welded joints liable
to lamellar tearing:
Cavity
Interdendritic
Gas pore shrinkage
Linear porosity
Interdendritic Transgranular
Elongated cavity
microshrinkage microshrinkage
Worm hole
Surface pore
3-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
3.3 Cavities
3.3.1 Gas pore
A gas cavity of essentially spherical shape trapped within the weld metal.
Isolated.
Uniformly distributed porosity.
Clustered (localised) porosity.
Linear porosity.
Elongated cavity.
Surface pore.
Causes Prevention
Damp fluxes/corroded electrode Use dry electrodes in good condition
(MMA)
Grease/hydrocarbon/water Clean prepared surface
contamination of prepared surface
Air entrapment in gas shield Check hose connections
(MIG/MAG, TIG)
Incorrect/insufficient deoxidant in Use electrode with sufficient deoxidation activity
electrode, filler or parent metal
Too great an arc voltage or length Reduce voltage and arc length
Gas evolution from priming Identify risk of reaction before surface treatment
paints/surface treatment is applied
Too high a shielding gas flow rate Optimise gas flow rate
results in turbulence (MIG/MAG, TIG)
Comments
Porosity can be localised or finely dispersed voids throughout the weld
metal.
3-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Causes Prevention
Gross contamination of preparation Introduce preweld cleaning procedures
surface
Laminated work surface Replace parent material with an unlaminated
piece
Crevices in work surface due to joint Eliminate joint shapes which produce crevices
geometry
Comments
Worm holes are caused by the progressive entrapment of gas between the
solidifying metal crystals (dendrites) producing characteristic elongated
pores of circular cross-section. These can appear as a herringbone array on
a radiograph. Some of them may break the surface of the weld.
3-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Causes Prevention
Damp or contaminated surface or Clean surface and dry electrodes
electrode
Low fluxing activity (MIG/MAG) Use a high activity flux
Excess sulphur (particularly free-cutting Use high manganese electrode to produce
steels) producing sulphur dioxide MnS. Note free-cutting steels (high sulphur)
should not normally be welded
Loss of shielding gas due to long arc or Improve screening against draughts and
high breezes (MIG/MAG) reduce arc length
Too high a shielding gas flow rate which Optimise gas flow rate
results in turbulence (MIG/MAG,TIG)
The origins of surface porosity are similar to those for uniform porosity.
Crater pipe
Causes Prevention
Lack of welder skill due to using processes Retrain welder
with too high a current
Inoperative crater filler (slope out) (TIG) Use correct crater filling techniques
Crater filling is a particular problem in TIG welding due to its low heat input.
To fill the crater for this process it is necessary to reduce the weld current
(slope out) in a series of descending steps until the arc is extinguished.
3-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Solid
inclusions
Tungsten
Copper
Causes Prevention
Incomplete slag removal from underlying Improve inter-run slag removal
surface of multi-pass weld
Slag flooding ahead of arc Position work to gain control of slag.
Welder needs to correct electrode angle
Entrapment of slag in work surface Dress/make work surface smooth
3-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Causes Prevention
Unfused flux due to damaged coating Use electrodes in good condition
Flux fails to melt and becomes trapped in Change the flux/wire. Adjust welding
the weld (SAW or FCAW) parameters ie current, voltage etc to produce
satisfactory welding conditions
Cause Prevention
Heavy millscale/rust on work surface Grind surface prior to welding
3-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Causes Prevention
Contact of electrode tip with weld pool Keep tungsten out of weld pool; use HF start
Contact of filler metal with hot tip of Avoid contact between electrode and filler
electrode metal
Contamination of the electrode tip by Reduce welding current; adjust shielding gas
spatter from the weld pool flow rate
Exceeding the current limit for a given Reduce welding current; replace electrode
electrode size or type with a larger diameter one
Extension of electrode beyond the normal Reduce electrode extension and/or welding
distance from the collet, resulting in current
overheating of the electrode
Inadequate tightening of the collet Tighten the collet
Inadequate shielding gas flow rate or Adjust the shielding gas flow rate; protect the
excessive draughts resulting in oxidation weld area; ensure that the post gas flow after
of the electrode tip stopping the arc continues for at least 5
seconds
Splits or cracks in the electrode Change the electrode, ensure the correct
size tungsten is selected for the given
welding current used
Inadequate shielding gas (eg use of Change to correct gas composition
argon-oxygen or argon-carbon dioxide
mixtures that are used for MAG welding)
Lack of
fusion
3-13
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Lack of union between the weld and parent metal at one or both sides of the
weld.
Causes Prevention
Low heat input to weld Increase arc voltage and/or welding current;
decrease travel speed
Molten metal flooding ahead of arc Improve electrode angle and work position;
increase travel speed
Oxide or scale on weld preparation Improve edge preparation procedure
Excessive inductance in MAG dip Reduce inductance, even if this increases
transfer welding spatter
During welding sufficient heat must be available at the edge of the weld pool
to produce fusion with the parent metal.
3-14
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Lack of union along the fusion line, between the weld beads.
Causes Prevention
Low arc current resulting in low fluidity of Increase current
weld pool
Too high a travel speed Reduce travel speed
Inaccurate bead placement Retrain welder
Lack of inter-run fusion produces crevices between the weld beads and
causes local entrapment of slag.
Lack of fusion between the weld and parent metal at the root of a weld.
Causes Prevention
Low heat input Increase welding current and/or arc voltage;
decrease travel speed
Excessive inductance in MAG dip Use correct induction setting for the parent
transfer welding, metal thickness
MMA electrode too large Reduce electrode size
(low current density)
Use of vertical down welding Switch to vertical-up procedure
Large root face Reduce root face
Small root gap Ensure correct root opening
Incorrect angle or electrode Use correct electrode angle.
manipulation Ensure welder is fully qualified and competent
Excessive misalignment at root Ensure correct alignment
3-15
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Lack of
penetration
Incomplete penetration
Causes Prevention
Excessively thick root face, insufficient Improve back gouging technique and ensure the
root gap or failure to cut back to sound edge preparation is as per approved WPS
metal when back gouging
Low heat input Increase welding current and/or arc voltage;
decrease travel speed
Excessive inductance in MAG dip Improve electrical settings and possibly switch to
transfer welding, pool flooding ahead spray arc transfer
of arc
MMA electrode too large Reduce electrode size
(low current density)
Use of vertical-down welding Switch to vertical-up procedure
3-16
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
If the weld joint is not of a critical nature, ie the required strength is low and
the area is not prone to fatigue cracking, it is possible to produce a partial
penetration weld. In this case incomplete root penetration is considered part
of this structure and not an imperfection (this would normally be determined
by the design or code requirement).
Both fusion faces of the root are not melted. When examined from the root
side, you can clearly see both of the root edges unmelted.
3-17
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Causes Prevention
Melting of top edge due to high welding Reduce power input, especially
current (especially at free edge) or high approaching a free edge where overheating
travel speed can occur
Attempting a fillet weld in horizontal vertical Weld in the flat position or use multi-run
(PB) position with leg length >9mm techniques
Excessive/incorrect weaving Reduce weaving width or switch to multi-
runs
Incorrect electrode angle Direct arc towards thicker member
Incorrect shielding gas selection (MAG) Ensure correct gas mixture for material type
and thickness (MAG)
Care must be taken during weld repairs of undercut to control the heat input.
If the bead of a repair weld is too small, the cooling rate following welding
will be excessive and the parent metal may have an increased hardness
and the weld susceptible to hydrogen cracking.
3-18
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Excess weld metal is the extra metal that produces excessive convexity in
fillet welds and a weld thickness greater than the parent metal plate in butt
welds. It is regarded as an imperfection only when the height of the excess
weld metal is greater than a specified limit.
Causes Prevention
Excess arc energy (MAG, SAW) Reduction of heat input
Shallow edge preparation Deepen edge preparation
Faulty electrode manipulation or build-up Improve welder skill
sequence
Incorrect electrode size Reduce electrode size
Too slow a travel speed Ensure correct travel speed is used
Incorrect electrode angle Ensure correct electrode angle is used
Wrong polarity used (electrode polarity DC- Ensure correct polarity ie DC+Ve
Ve (MMA, SAW ) Note DC-Ve must be used for TIG
3-19
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Causes Prevention
Weld heat input too high Reduce arc voltage and/or welding current;
increase welding speed
Incorrect weld preparation ie excessive Improve workpiece preparation
root gap, thin edge preparation, lack of
backing
Use of electrode unsuited to welding Use correct electrode for position
position
Lack of welder skill Retrain welder
3-20
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
3.6.4 Overlap
Causes Prevention
Poor electrode manipulation (MMA) Retrain welder
High heat input/low travel speed Reduce heat input or limit leg size to 9mm max
causing surface flow of fillet welds leg size for single pass fillets
Incorrect positioning of weld Change to flat position
Wrong electrode coating type resulting Change electrode coating type to a more
in too high a fluidity suitable fast freezing type which is less fluid
For a fillet weld overlap is often associated with undercut, as if the weld pool
is too fluid the top of the weld will flow away to produce undercut at the top
and overlap at the base. If the volume of the weld pool is too large in a fillet
weld in horizontal-vertical (PB) position, weld metal will collapse due to
gravity, producing both defects (undercut at the top and overlap at the
base), this defect is called sagging.
3-21
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Misalignment between two welded pieces such that while their surface
planes are parallel, they are not in the required same plane.
Causes Prevention
Inaccuracies in assembly procedures or Adequate checking of alignment prior to
distortion from other welds welding coupled with the use of clamps and
wedges
Excessive out of flatness in hot rolled Check accuracy of rolled section prior to
plates or sections welding
Misalignment between two welded pieces such that their surface planes are
not parallel or at the intended angle.
3-22
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Causes Prevention
Insufficient weld metal Increase the number of weld runs
Irregular weld bead surface Retrain welder
3-23
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Causes Prevention
Severe arc blow Switch from DC to AC, keep arc length as short as
possible
Irregular weld bead surface Retrain welder
Although this imperfection may not affect the integrity of the completed weld,
it can affect the width of HAZ and reduce the load-carrying capacity of the
joint (in fine-grained structural steels) or impair corrosion resistance (in
duplex stainless steels).
A shallow groove that occurs due to shrinkage at the root of a butt weld.
Causes Prevention
Insufficient arc power to produce positive bead Raise arc energy
Incorrect preparation/fit-up Work to WPS
Excessive backing gas pressure (TIG) Reduce gas pressure
Lack of welder skill Retrain welder
Slag flooding in backing bar groove Tilt work to prevent slag flooding
A backing strip can be used to control the extent of the root bead.
3-24
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
3.6.9 Burn-through
Causes Prevention
Insufficient travel speed Increase the travel speed
Excessive welding current Reduce welding current
Lack of welder skill Retrain welder
Excessive grinding of root face More care taken, retrain welder
Excessive root gap Ensure correct fit-up
This is a gross imperfection which occurs due to lack of welder skill. It can
be repaired by bridging the gap formed into the joint, but requires a great
deal of attention.
3-25
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Local damage to the surface of the parent metal adjacent to the weld,
resulting from arcing or striking the arc outside the weld groove. This results
in random areas of fused metal where the electrode, holder or current return
clamp have accidentally touched the work.
Causes Prevention
Poor access to the work Improve access (modify assembly sequence)
Missing insulation on electrode Institute a regular inspection scheme for
holder or torch electrode holders and torches
Failure to provide an insulated Provide an insulated resting place
resting place for the electrode holder
or torch when not in use
Loose current return clamp Regularly maintain current return clamps
Adjusting wire feed (MAG welding) Retrain welder
without isolating welding current
An arc strike can produce a hard HAZ, which may contain cracks, which can
lead to serious cracking in service. It is better to remove an arc strike by
grinding than weld repair.
3-26
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
3.7.2 Spatter
Globules of weld or filler metal expelled during welding and adhering to the
surface of parent metal or solidified weld metal.
Causes Prevention
High arc current Reduce arc current
Long arc length Reduce arc length
Magnetic arc blow Reduce arc length or switch to AC power
Incorrect settings for GMAW process Modify electrical settings (but be careful to
maintain full fusion!)
Damp electrodes Use dry electrodes
Wrong selection of shielding gas Increase argon content if possible, however if
(100%CO2) too high may lead to lack of penetration
Spatter in itself is a cosmetic imperfection and does not affect the integrity of
the weld. However as it is usually caused by an excessive welding current, it
is a sign that the welding conditions are not ideal and so there are usually
other associated problems within the structure ie high heat input. Some
spatter is always produced by open arc consumable electrode welding
processes. Anti-spatter compounds can be used on the parent metal to
reduce sticking and the spatter can then be scraped off.
3-27
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Chipping mark
Local damage due to the use of a chisel or other tools.
Underflushing
Lack of thickness of the workpiece due to excessive grinding.
3-28
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Imperfections and Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The acceptance of a certain size and type of defect for a given structure is
normally expressed as the defect acceptance standard, usually incorporated
in application standards or specifications.
If the defect is too deep it must be removed and new weld metal added to
ensure a minimum design throat thickness.
3-29
www.twitraining.com
Section 4
Destructive Testing
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
4 Destructive Testing
Introduction
European Welding Standards require test coupons made for welding
procedure qualification testing to be subjected to non-destructive and then
destructive testing.
The tests are called destructive tests because the welded joint is destroyed
when various types of test piece are taken from it.
Destructive tests can be divided into two groups, those used to:
Qualitative tests are used to verify that the joint is free from defects, of
sound quality and examples of these are bend tests, macroscopic
examination and fracture tests (fillet fracture and nick-break).
Design engineers use the minimum property values listed for particular
grades of material as the basis for design and the most cost-effective
designs are based on an assumption that welded joints have properties that
are no worse than those of the base metal.
4-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Test specimens
A transverse tensile test piece typical of the type specified by European
Welding Standards is shown below.
Test pieces may be machined to represent the full thickness of the joint but
for very thick joints it may be necessary to take several transverse tensile
test specimens to be able to test the full thickness.
Method
Test specimens are accurately measured before testing, then fitted into the
jaws of a tensile testing machine and subjected to a continually increasing
tensile force until the specimen fractures.
The tensile strength (Rm) is calculated by dividing the maximum load by the
cross-sectional area of the test specimen, measured before testing.
The test is intended to measure the tensile strength of the joint and thereby
show that the basis for design, the base metal properties, remain the valid
criterion.
Acceptance criteria
If the test piece breaks in the weld metal, it is acceptable provided the
calculated strength is not less than the minimum tensile strength specified,
which is usually the minimum specified for the base metal material grade.
In the ASME IX code, if the test specimen breaks outside the weld or fusion
zone at a stress above 95% of the minimum base metal strength the test
result is acceptable.
4-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The test is to measure tensile strength and also yield (or proof strength) and
tensile ductility.
Specimens
As the name indicates, test specimens are machined from welds parallel
with their longitudinal axis and the specimen gauge length must be 100%
weld metal.
Round cross-section
Method
Specimens are subjected to a continually increasing force in the same way
that transverse tensile specimens are tested.
4-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Typical load extension curves and their principal characteristics are shown
below.
Load extension curve for a steel that Load-extension curve for a steel (or other
shows a distinct yield point at the metal) that does not show a distinct yield
elastic limit. point; proof stress is a measure of the
elastic limit.
4-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Design engineers need to ensure that the toughness of the steel used for a
particular item will be enough to avoid brittle fracture in service and so
impact specimens are tested at a temperature related to the design
temperature for the fabricated component.
C-Mn and low alloy steels undergo a sharp change in their resistance to
brittle fracture as their temperature is lowered so that a steel that may have
very good toughness at ambient temperature may show extreme brittleness
at sub-zero temperatures, as illustrated in following figure.
47 Joules
28 Joules
Energy absorbed
Brittle fracture
- 50 - 40 - 30 - 20 - 10 0
Testing temperature - Degrees Centigrade
Three specimens are normally tested at each temperature
Specimens
Test specimen dimensions have been standardised internationally and are
shown below for full size specimens. There are also standard dimensions
for smaller sized specimens, for example 10 x 7.5mm and 10 x 5mm.
4-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Specimens are machined from welded test plates with the notch position
located in different positions according to the testing requirements but
typically in the centre of the weld metal and at positions across the HAZ, as
shown below.
Typical notch positions for Charpy V notch test specimens from double V butt
welds.
Method
Test specimens are cooled to the specified test temperature by immersion in
an insulated bath containing a liquid held at the test temperature.
Impact specimen on
the anvil showing the
hammer position at
point of impact.
Impact testing machine.
4-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The energy absorbed by the hammer when it strikes each test specimen is
shown by the position of the hammer pointer on the scale of the machine.
Energy values are given in Joules (or ft-lbs in US specifications).
Impact test specimens are taken in triplicate (three for each notch position)
as there is always some degree of scatter in the results, particularly for
weldments.
Acceptance criteria
Each test result is recorded and an average value calculated for each set of
three tests. These values are compared with those specified by the
application standard or client to establish whether specified requirements
have been met.
4-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A specimen that exhibits extreme brittleness will show a clean break, both
halves of the specimen having a completely flat fracture face with little or no
lateral expansion.
A specimen that exhibits very good toughness will show only a small degree
of crack extension, without fracture and a high value of lateral expansion.
Methods
There are three widely used methods for hardness testing:
The hardness value is given by the size of the indentation produced under a
standard load, the smaller the indentation, the harder the metal.
4-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
d1 d2
d
2
Both the Vickers and Brinell methods are suitable for carrying out hardness
surveys on specimens prepared for macroscopic examination of weldments.
4-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Calculating the size of a crack that would initiate a brittle fracture under
certain stress conditions at a particular temperature.
The stress that would cause a certain sized crack to give a brittle fracture
at a particular temperature.
Specimens
A CTOD specimen is prepared as a rectangular or square shaped bar cut
transverse to the axis of the butt weld. A V notch is machined at the centre
of the bar, which will be coincident with the test position, weld metal or HAZ.
A shallow saw cut is made at the bottom of the notch and the specimen is
then put into a machine that induces a cyclic bending load until a shallow
fatigue crack initiates from the saw cut.
4-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Method
CTOD specimens are usually tested at a temperature below ambient and
the specimen temperature is controlled by immersion in a bath of liquid
cooled to the required test temperature.
For each test condition (position of notch and test temperature) it is usual to
carry out three tests.
4-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The figures below illustrate the main features of the CTOD test.
Fracture toughness is expressed as the distance the crack tip opens without
initiation of a brittle crack.
Acceptance criteria
An application standard or client may specify a minimum CTOD value that
indicates ductile tearing. Alternatively, the test may be for information so that
a value can be used for an engineering critical assessment (ECA).
A very tough steel weldment will allow the mouth of the crack to open widely
by ductile tearing at the tip of the crack whereas a very brittle weldment will
tend to fracture when the applied load is quite low and without any extension
at the tip of the crack.
4-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Specimens
There are four types of bend specimen:
Face
Specimen taken with axis transverse to butt welds up to ~12mm
thickness and bent so that the face of the weld is on the outside of the
bend (face in tension).
Root
Test specimen taken with axis transverse to butt welds up to ~12mm
thickness and bent so that the root of the weld is on the outside of the
bend (root in tension).
Side
Test specimen taken as a transverse slice (~10mm) from the full
thickness of butt welds >~12mm and bent so that the full joint thickness
is tested (side in tension).
Longitudinal bend
Test specimen taken with axis parallel to the longitudinal axis of a butt
weld; specimen thickness is ~12mm and the face or root of weld may be
tested in tension.
4-13
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Method
Guided bend tests are usually used for welding procedure and welder
qualification.
The diameter of the former used for a particular test is specified in the code,
having been determined by the type of material being tested and the ductility
that can be expected from it after welding and any PWHT.
The standard that specifies the test method will specify the minimum bend
angle the specimen must experience and this is typically 120-1800.
4-14
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Acceptance criteria
Bend tests pieces should exhibit satisfactory soundness by not showing
cracks or any signs of significant fissures or cavities on the outside of the
bend.
Small indications less than about 3mm in length may be allowed by some
standards.
Objective
The quality/soundness of a fillet weld can be assessed by fracturing test
pieces and examining the fracture surfaces.
This method for assessing the quality of fillet welds may be specified by
application standards as an alternative to macroscopic examination.
It is a test method that can be used for welder qualification testing according
to European Standards but is not used for welding procedure qualification.
Specimens
A test weld is cut into short (typically 50mm) lengths and a longitudinal
notch machined into the specimen as shown below. The notch profile may
be square, V or U shape.
Method
Specimens are made to fracture through their throat by dynamic strokes
(hammering) or by pressing, as shown below. The welding standard or
application standard will specify the number of tests (typically four).
4-15
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Acceptance criteria
The standard for welder qualification, or application standard, will specify the
acceptance criteria for imperfections such as lack of penetration into the root
of the joint and solid inclusions and porosity that are visible on the fracture
surfaces.
Test reports should also give a description of the appearance of the fracture
and location of any imperfection.
Objective
The objective of these fracture tests is the same as for fillet fracture tests.
Specimens
Test specimens are taken from a butt weld and notched so that the fracture
path will be in the central region of the weld. Typical test piece types are
shown below.
Method
Test pieces are made to fracture by hammering or three-point bending.
4-16
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Acceptance criteria
The standard for welder qualification, or application standard, will specify the
acceptance criteria for imperfections such as lack of fusion, solid inclusions
and porosity that are visible on the fracture surfaces.
Test reports should also give a description of the appearance of the fracture
and location of any imperfection.
4-17
www.twitraining.com
Section 5
Non-Destructive Testing
Rev 1 November 2010
Non-destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5 Non-destructive Testing
5.1 Introduction
Radiographic, ultrasonic, dye penetrant and magnetic particle methods are
briefly described below. Their relative advantages and limitations are
discussed in terms of their applicability to the examination of welds.
5.2.2 X-rays
X-rays used in the industrial radiography of welds generally have photon
energies in the range 30keV up to 20MeV. Up to 400keV they are generated
by conventional X-ray tubes which, dependant upon output may be suitable
for portable or fixed installations. Portability falls off rapidly with increasing
kilovoltage and radiation output. Above 400keV X-rays are produced using
devices such as betatrons and linear accelerators, not generally suitable for
use outside of fixed installations.
5-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Non-destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Increased portability.
No need for a power source.
Lower initial equipment costs.
5-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Non-destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Non-destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Non-destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
detection of weld defects. Since velocity is a constant for any given material
and sound travels in a straight line (with the right equipment) ultrasound can
also be used to give accurate positional information about a given reflector.
Careful observation of the echo pattern of a given reflector and its behaviour
as the ultrasonic probe is moved together with the positional information
obtained above and knowledge of the component history, enables the
experienced ultrasonic operator to classify the reflector as slag, lack of
fusion or a crack.
A flaw detector:
- Pulse generator.
- Adjustable time base generator with an adjustable delay control.
- Cathode ray tube with fully rectified display.
- Calibrated amplifier with a graduated gain control or attenuator.
An ultrasonic probe:
- Piezo-electric crystal element capable of converting electrical vibrations
into mechanical vibrations and viceversa.
- Probe shoe, normally a Perspex block to which the crystal is firmly
attached using a suitable adhesive.
- Electrical and/or mechanical crystal damping facilities to prevent
excessive ringing.
5-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Non-destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Ultrasonic equipment.
5-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Non-destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Non-destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Advantages Limitations
Inexpensive equipment Only magnetic materials
Direct location of defect May need to demagnetise components
Surface conditions not critical Access may be a problem for the yoke
Could be applied without power Need power if using a yoke
Low skill level No permanent record
Sub- surface defects found 1-2mm Calibration of equipment
Quick, instant results Testing in two directions required
Hot testing (using dry powder) Need good lighting - 500 lux minimum
Can be used in the dark (UV light)
5-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Non-destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Non-destructive Testing
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5-10
www.twitraining.com
Section 6
WPS/Welder Qualification
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
6 WPS/Welder Qualifications
6.1 General
When structures and pressurised items are fabricated by welding, it is
essential that all the welded joints are sound and have suitable properties
for their application.
6-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
EN ISO 15614
Specification and qualification of welding procedures for metallic materials,
welding procedure test.
Part 1
Arc and gas welding of steels and arc welding of nickel and nickel alloys.
Part 2
Arc welding of aluminium and its alloys.
ASME Section IX
Pressurised systems (vessels and pipework).
AWS D1.1
Structural welding of steels.
AWS D1.2
Structural welding of aluminium.
Some alternative ways that can be used for writing qualified WPSs for some
applications are:
6-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Table 6.1 Typical sequence for welding procedure qualification by means of a test
weld.
6-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
6-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The welding conditions that are allowed to be written on a qualified WPS are
referred to as the qualification range and depends on the welding conditions
used for the test piece (as-run details) and form part of the WPQR.
Essential variable
Variable that has an effect on the mechanical properties of the weldment
and if changed beyond the limits specified by the standard will require
the WPS to be re-qualified.
Non-essential variable
Variable that must be specified on a WPS but does not have a significant
effect on the mechanical properties of the weldment and can be changed
without the need for re-qualification but will require a new WPS to be
written.
1 Make another test weld using similar welding conditions to those used
for the affected weld and subject this to the same tests used for the
relevant WPQR to demonstrate that the properties still satisfy specified
requirements.
2 Remove the affected weld and re-weld the joint strictly in accordance
with the designated WPS.
Most of the welding variables classed as essential are the same in both the
European and American Welding Standards but their qualification ranges
may differ.
6-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Welders also need to have the skill to consistently produce sound (defect-
free) welds.
EN 287-1
Qualification test of welders Fusion welding.
Part 1: Steels.
EN ISO 9606-2
6-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
EN 1418
Welding personnel Approval testing of welding operators for fusion
welding and resistance weld setters for fully mechanised and automatic
welding of metallic materials.
ASME Section IX
Pressurised systems (vessels & pipework).
AWS D1.1
Structural welding of steels.
AWS D1.2
Structural welding of aluminium.
Table 6.3 shows the steps required for qualifying welders in accordance with
EU Standards.
6-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The welding engineer writes a WPS for welder qualification test piece.
The welder makes the test weld in accordance with the WPS.
A welding inspector monitors the welding to ensure that the welder is
working in accordance with the WPS.
6-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Figure 6.3 Example of a WPQR document (test weld details) to EN 15614 format
6-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Some welding variables classed as essential for welder qualification are the
same types as those classified as essential for welding procedure
qualification, but the range of qualification may be significantly wider.
6-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Records/evidence are available that can be traced to the welder and the
WPSs used for production welding.
Supporting evidence must relate to volumetric examination of the
welders production welds (RT or UT) on two welds made during the six
months prior to the extension date.
Supporting evidence welds must satisfy the acceptance levels for
imperfections specified by the EU welding standard and have been
made under the same conditions as the original test weld.
6-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Figure 6.4 Example of WPQR document (details of weld test) to EN 15614 format.
6-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
WPS/Welder Qualifications
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
6-13
www.twitraining.com
Section 7
Materials Inspection
Rev 1 November 2010
Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
7 Materials Inspection
7.1 General
One of the duties of the visual/welding inspector is materials inspection and
there are a number of situations where this will be required:
A wide range of materials are available that can be used in fabrication and
welding and include, but are not limited to:
Steels.
Stainless steels.
Aluminium and its alloys.
Nickel and its alloys.
Copper and its alloys.
Titanium and its alloys.
Cast iron.
These materials are all widely used in fabrication, welding and construction
to meet the requirements of a diverse range of applications and industry
sectors.
There are three essential aspects to material inspection that the Inspector
should consider:
7-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
S Structural steel.
355 Minimum yield strength: N/mm at t 16mm.
J2 Longitudinal Charpy, 27Joules 6-20C.
G3 Normalised or normalised rolled.
Commonly used materials and most alloys of these materials can be fusion
welded using various welding processes, in a wide range of thickness and
where applicable, diameters.
7-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Non-specific inspection
Inspection carried out by the manufacturer in accordance with his own
procedures to assess whether products defined by the same product
specification and made by the same manufacturing process, comply with
the requirements of the order.
- Type 2.1 are documents in which the manufacturer declares that the
products supplied comply with the requirements of the order without
inclusion of test results.
-Type 2.2 are documents in which the manufacturer declares that the
products supplied comply with the requirements of the order and
includes test results based on non-specific inspection.
Specific inspection
Inspection carried out, before delivery according to the product
specification, on the products to be supplied or test units of which the
products supplied are part, to verify that these products comply with the
requirements of the order.
- Type 3.1 are certificates in which the manufacturer declares that the
products supplied comply with the requirements of the order and in
which test results are supplied.
7-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Non-specific inspection*
may be replaced by specific
inspection if specified in the material
standard or the order.
Specific inspection
Quality management system of the material
manufacturer certified by a competent body
established within the community and having
undergone a specific assessment for materials
7-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
General inspection.
Visible imperfections.
Dimensions.
Surface condition.
General inspection
This takes account of storage conditions, methods of handling, number of
plates or pipes and distortion tolerances.
Visible imperfections
Typical visible imperfections are usually attributable to the manufacturing
process and include cold laps, which break the surface or laminations if they
appear at the edge of the plate. Ultrasonic testing using a compression
probe may be required for laminations, which may be present in the body of
the material.
Dimensions
For plates this includes length, width and thickness.
For pipes, this includes length and wall thickness, and also inspection of
diameter and ovality. At this stage of inspection the material cast or heat
number may be recorded for validation against the material certificate.
Surface condition
The surface condition is important and must not show excessive millscale or
rust, be badly pitted, or have unacceptable mechanical damage.
7-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
There are four grades of rusting which the inspector may have to consider:
Rust Grade A: Steel surface largely covered with adherent millscale with
little or no rust.
Rust Grade B: Steel surface, which has begun to rust and from which
millscale has begun to flake.
Rust Grade C: Steel surface on which the mill scale has rusted away or
from which it can be scraped. Slight pitting visible under normal vision.
Rust Grade D: Steel surface on which millscale has rusted away. General
pitting visible under normal vision.
7-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Materials Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
7.6 Summary
Material inspection is an important part of the inspectors duties and an
understanding of the documentation involved is key to success.
These methods may include but are not limited to: Spark test, spectroscopic
analysis, chemical analysis, scleroscope hardness test, etc. These types of
test are normally conducted by an approved test house, but sometimes on-
site and the inspector may be required to witness them to verify compliance
with the purchase order or appropriate standard(s).
7-7
www.twitraining.com
Section 8
8.2 Definitions
Normative document
Document that provides rules, guidelines or characteristics for activities or
their results. The term normative document is generic, covering documents
such as standards, technical specifications, codes of practice and
regulations.*
Standard
Document established by consensus and approved by a recognised body. A
standard provides, for common and repeated use, guidelines, rules,
characteristics for activities or their results, aimed at achieving the optimum
degree of order in a given context.*
Harmonised standards
Standards on the same subject approved by different standardising bodies,
that establish interchangeability of products, processes and services, or
mutual understanding of test results or information provided according to
these standards.*
Code of practice
Document that recommends practices or procedures for the design,
manufacture, installation, maintenance and utilisation of equipment,
structures or products. A code of practice may be a standard, part of a
standard or independent of a standard.*
Regulation
Document providing binding legislative rules adopted by an authority.*
Authority
A body (responsible for standards and regulations legal or administrative
entity that has specific tasks and composition) that has legal powers and
rights.*
8-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Codes and Standards
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Regulatory authority
Authority responsible for preparing or adopting regulations.*
Enforcement authority
Authority responsible for enforcing regulations.*
Specification
Document stating requirements, meaningful data and its supporting medium
stating needs or expectations that are stated, generally implied or
obligatory.**
Procedure
Specified way to carry out an activity or process*. Usually a written
description of all essential parameters and precautions to be observed when
applying a technique to a specific application following an established
standard, code or specification.
Instruction
Written description of the precise steps to be followed based on an
established procedure, standard, code or specification.
Quality plan
Document specifying which procedures and associated resources shall be
applied by whom and when to a specific project, product, process or
contract.*
8.3 Summary
Application standards and codes of practice ensure that a structure or
component will have an acceptable level of quality and be fit for purpose.
8-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Codes and Standards
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
BS number Title
BS 499: Part 1 Glossary of welding terms.
Methods of destructive testing fusion welded joints and weld
BS 709
metal in steel.
Specification for design and manufacture of water-tube steam
BS 1113
generating plant.
BS 1453 Specification for filler materials for gas welding.
Specification for Class I oxyacetylene welding of ferritic steel
BS 1821
pipe work for carrying fluids.
BS 2493 Low alloy steel electrodes for MMA welding.
Specification for Class I arc welding of ferritic steel pipe work for
BS 2633
carrying fluids.
Specification for Class II oxyacetylene welding of carbon steel
BS 2640
pipe work for carrying fluids.
Specification for manufacture of vertical steel welded non-
BS 2654 refrigerated storage tanks with butt-welded shells for the
petroleum industry.
BS 2901: Part 3 Filler rods and wires for copper and copper alloys.
Specification for chromium and chromium-nickel steel electrodes
BS 2926
for MMA.
BS 3019 TIG welding.
Steel pipes and tubes for pressure purposes: Ferritic alloy steel
BS 3604 with specified elevated temperature properties for pressure
purposes.
BS 3605 Specification for seamless tubes.
BS 4515 Specification for welding of steel pipelines on land and offshore.
BS 4570 Specification for fusion welding of steel castings.
BS 4677 Specification for arc welding of austenitic stainless steel pipe
work for carrying fluids.
Approval testing of welders when procedure approval is not
BS 4872: Part 1
required. Fusion welding of steel.
BS 4872: Part 2 TIG or MIG welding of aluminium and its alloys.
Specification for seamless and welded steel tubes for
BS 6323
automobile, mechanical and general engineering purposes.
BS 6693 Method for determination of diffusible hydrogen in weld metal.
Code of practice for welding on steel pipes containing process
BS 6990
fluids or their residues.
Specification for weldable structural steels for fixed offshore
BS 7191
structures.
BS 7570 Code of practice for validation of arc welding equipment.
8-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Codes and Standards
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
BS EN number Title
BS EN 287: Part 1: Qualification test of welders - Fusion welding - Steels.
Wire electrodes and deposits for gas shielded metal arc of
BS EN 440
non-alloy and fine grain steels.
Covered electrodes for manual metal arc welding of non-alloy
BS EN 499
and fine grain steels.
BS EN 383: Parts Quality requirements for fusion welding of metallic materials.
1-5
Wire electrodes and flux wire combinations for submerged arc
BS EN 756
welding of non-alloy and fine grain steels.
BS EN 760 Fluxes for submerged arc welding.
BS EN 910 Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials-Bend tests.
Non-destructive examination of fusion welds - visual
BS EN 970
examination.
BS EN 12072 Filler rods and wires for stainless steels.
Aluminium and aluminium alloys and magnesium alloys. Nickel
BS EN ISO 18274
and nickel alloys.
BS EN number Title
BS EN 1011. Welding recommendations for welding of metallic materials.
Part 1 General guidance for arc welding.
Part 2 Arc welding of ferritic steels.
Part 3 Arc welding of stainless steels.
Part 4 Arc welding of aluminium and aluminium alloys.
BS EN 1320 Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials.
Non-destructive examination of welds Radiographic
BS EN 1435
examination of welded joints.
BS EN 10002 Tensile testing of metallic materials.
BS EN 10020 Definition and classification of grades of steel.
BS EN 10027 Designation systems for steels.
BS EN 10045 Charpy impact tests on metallic materials.
BS EN 10204 Metallic products Types of inspection documents.
Welded, brazed and soldered joints Symbolic representation
BS EN 22553
on drawings.
Welding, brazing, soldering and braze welding of metal.
BS EN 24063 Nomenclature of processes and reference numbers for
symbolic representation on drawings.
Arc welded joints in steel. Guidance on quality levels for
BS EN 25817
imperfections.
Classification of imperfections in metallic fusion welds, with
BS EN 26520
explanations.
Specification for tungsten electrodes for inert gas shielded arc
BS EN 26848
welding and for plasma cutting and welding.
Note: The inspector should have an awareness of the standards printed in bold.
8-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Codes and Standards
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
8-5
www.twitraining.com
Section 9
Welding Symbols
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
9 Welding Symbols
A weld joint can be represented on an engineering drawing by a detailed
sketch showing every detail and dimension of the joint preparation, as
shown below.
8-12
R6
1-3mm
1-4mm
Single U preparation.
9-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
European Standard
EN 22553 Welded, brazed & soldered joints, Symbolic representation on
drawings.
American Standard
AWS A2.4, standard symbols for welding, brazing and non-destructive
examination.
These standards are very similar in many respects, but there are also some
major differences that need to be understood to avoid misinterpretation.
9-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Fillet weld
Surfacing (cladding)
Backing run
(back or backing weld)
Backing bar
9-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
9-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Examples of supplementary symbols and how they are applied are given
below.
Convex double V
butt weld
Note: If the weld symbol does not have a supplementary symbol then the shape of
the weld surface does not need to be indicated precisely.
9-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
An arrow line.
A dual reference line consisting of a continuous and a dashed line.
1 = Arrow line
1 2a = Reference (continuous
line)
2b = Identification line
(dashed line)
2b 3 = Welding symbol
(single V joint)
Joint line
The arrow side is always the end of the joint line that the arrow line points to
(and touches).
It can be at either end of the joint line and it is the draughtsman who decides
which end to make the arrow side.
9-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
arrow line
arrow line
arrow
arrow sideside
other side
other side
other side
arrow side
arrow side arrow line
otherother
sideside arrow side
arrow side arrow side otherside
other side
arrow side
For a non-symmetrical weld it is essential that the arrow side and other side
of the weld are distinguished. The convention for doing this is:
Symbols for the weld details required on the arrow side must be placed
on the continuous line.
Symbols for the weld details on the other side must be placed on the
dashed line.
9-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
or
9-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Dimensions for the cross-section of the weld are written on the lefthand
side of the symbol.
Length dimensions for the weld are written on the righthand side of the
symbol.
In the absence of any indication to the contrary, all butt welds are full
penetration welds.
Some examples of how these symbols are used are shown below.
Partial
Partialpenetration
penetration s10
10mm single
single Vbutt
V buttweld
weld
8mm
a6
Filletweld
Fillet weldwith
with6mm
6mmthroat
6mm
9-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
l Length of weld.
The use of these letters is shown for the intermittent double-sided fillet weld
shown below.
100mm
9-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
z n L (e)
z n L (e)
9-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
111 = MMA
121 = SAW 111
131 = MIG
135 = MAG
A closed tail can also be used into which reference to a specific instruction
can be added.
WPS 014
9-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Symbols
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Arrow side
Other side
Welding positions
PA 1G/1F Flat/downhand
PB 2F Horizontal-vertical
PC 2G Horizontal
PD 4F Horizontal-vertical (overhead)
PE 4G Overhead
PF 3G/ 5G Vertical-up
PG 3G/ 5G Vertical-down
H-L045 6G Inclined pipe (upwards)
J-L045 6G Inclined pipe (downwards)
9-13
www.twitraining.com
Section 10
10.2 Productivity
With most welding processes, welding in the PA (flat or 1G) position results
in the highest weld metal deposition rate and therefore productivity.
For TIG welding, the higher the current, the more energy there is for fusion
so the higher the rate at which filler wire can be added to the weld pool.
Heat input is the energy supplied by the welding arc to the workpiece and is
expressed in terms of arc energy x thermal efficiency factor.
The thermal efficiency factor is the ratio of heat energy into the welding arc
to the electrical energy consumed by the arc.
10-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Introduction to Welding Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Heat input values into the weld for various processes can be calculated from
the arc energy by multiplying by the following thermal efficiency factors:
Example
A weld is made using the MAG welding process and the following welding
conditions were recorded:
Volts: 24
Amps: 240
Travel speed: 300mm per minute
V
o
l
t
s
x
A
m
p
s
A
r
c
e
n
e
r
g
y
k
j
/
m
m
T
r
a
v
e
l
s
p
e
e
d
m
m
/
s
e
c
x
1
0
0
0
24 240
= 300 / 60 1000
5760
= 5000
Welding position and the process have a major influence on the travel
speed that can be used.
For manual and semi-automatic welding the following are general principles:
10-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Introduction to Welding Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Overhead welding tends to give low heat input because of the need to
use low current and relatively fast travel speed.
Welding in the flat position (downhand) can be a low or high heat input
position because the welder has more flexibility about the travel speed
that can be used.
Of the arc welding processes, SAW has the potential to give the highest
heat input and deposition rates and TIG and MIG/MAG can produce very
low heat input.
Typical heat input values for controlled heat input welding will tend to be
in the range ~1.0-~3.5kJ/mm.
For MIG/MAG, arc voltage has a major influence on droplet transfer across
the arc.
Welding current
Welding current has a major influence on the depth of fusion/penetration
into the base metal and adjacent weld runs.
As a rule, the higher the current the greater the depth of penetration.
Penetration depth affects dilution of the weld deposit by the parent metal
and it is particularly important to control this when dissimilar metals are
joined.
Polarity
Polarity determines whether most of the arc energy (heat) is concentrated at
the electrode surface or at the surface of the parent material.
The location of the heat with respect to polarity is not the same for all
processes and the effects/options/benefits for each of the main arc welding
processes are summarised below.
10-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Introduction to Welding Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Polarity
Process
DC+ve DC-ve AC
Best penetration Less penetration but higher Not suitable for
deposition rate (used for some electrodes.
MMA
root passes and weld Minimises arc blow
overlaying)
Rarely used due Used for all metals, except Required for Al/Al
to tungsten Al/Al alloys and Mg/Mg alloys to break-up
TIG
overheating alloys the refractory
oxide film
GMAW solid Used for all metals Rarely used Not used
wires and virtually all
(MIG/MAG) situations
Once an arc has been struck and stabilised, there is a relationship between
the arc voltage and current flowing through the welding circuit that depends
on the electrical characteristics of the power source.
10-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Introduction to Welding Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
100
OCV
Voltage (V)
50
A
Arc voltage variation
B
C
For manual welding (MMA and manual TIG) the welder sets the required
current on the power source but arc voltage is controlled by the arc length
the welder uses.
A welder has to work within a fairly narrow range of arc length for a
particular current setting, if it is too long the arc will extinguish, too short and
the electrode may stub into the weld pool and the arc extinguished.
For the operating principle of this type of power source see Figure 10.1.
The welder tries to hold a fairly constant arc length (B in Figure 10.1) for the
current (Y) that has been set. However, he cannot keep the arc length
constant and it will vary over a small working range (A-C) due to normal
hand movement during welding.
10-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Introduction to Welding Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The power source is designed to ensure that these small changes in arc
voltage during normal welding will give only small changes in current (X to
Z). Thus, the current can be considered to be essentially constant and this
ensures that the welder is able to maintain control of fusion.
The drooping shape of the volt-amp curves has led to constant current
power sources sometimes being said to have a drooping characteristic.
Wire feed speed and current are directly related so that as the current is
increases, so does the feed speed and there is a corresponding increase in
the burn-off rate to maintain the arc length/voltage.
The operating principle of this type of power source is shown in Figure 10.2.
A welder sets voltage B and current Y on the power source. If the arc length
is decreased to C (due to a variation in weld profile or as the welders hand
moves up and down during semi-automatic welding) there will be a
momentary increase in welding current to Z. The higher current Z gives a
higher burn-off rate and this brings the arc length (and arc voltage) back to
the pre-set value.
Similarly, if the arc length increases the current quickly falls to X and the
burn-off rate is reduced so that the arc length is brought back to the pre-set
level B.
Thus, although the arc voltage does vary a little during welding the changes
in current that restore the voltage to the pre-set value happen extremely
quickly so that the voltage can be considered to remain constant.
The straight-line relationship between voltage and current and the relatively
small gradient is why this type of power source is often referred to as having
a flat characteristic.
10-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Introduction to Welding Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
100
OCV
Voltage V
50
Arc voltage variation
A
B
C
Current A X Y Z
Figure 10.2 Typical volt-amp curves for a constant voltage power source.
10-7
www.twitraining.com
Section 11
MMA Welding
Rev 1 November 2010
Manual Metal Arc/Shielded Metal Arc Welding (MMA/SMAW)
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The most versatile welding process, MMA welding is suitable for most
ferrous and non-ferrous metals, over a wide range of thicknesses. It can be
used in all positions, with reasonable ease of use and relatively
economically. The final weld quality is primarily dependent on the skill of the
welder.
When an arc is struck between the coated electrode and workpiece, both
the electrode and workpiece surface melt to form a weld pool. The average
temperature of the arc is approximately 6000C, sufficient to simultaneously
melt the parent metal, consumable core wire and flux coating. The flux
forms gas and slag which protect the weld pool from oxygen and nitrogen in
the surrounding atmosphere. The molten slag solidifies, cools and must be
chipped off the weld bead once the weld run is complete (or before the next
weld pass is deposited). The process allows only short lengths of weld to be
produced before a new electrode needs to be inserted in the holder.
Electrode angle
75-80o to the horizontal
Consumable electrode
Filler metal core
Flux coating
Direction of electrode travel
Parent
metal
Weld metal
MMA welding.
11-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Manual Metal Arc/Shielded Metal Arc Welding (MMA/SMAW)
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
1
10
9 2
8 3
4
7
6 5
Power sources for MMA welding are transformers (which transform mains
AC-AC suitable for welding), transformer-rectifiers (which rectify AC-DC),
diesel or petrol driven generators (preferred for site work) or inverters (a
11-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Manual Metal Arc/Shielded Metal Arc Welding (MMA/SMAW)
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Current (amperage)
Voltage
Travel speed Affects heat input
Polarity
Type of electrode
11-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Manual Metal Arc/Shielded Metal Arc Welding (MMA/SMAW)
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
11.3.2 Voltage
The welding potential or pressure required for current to flow through the
circuit is the voltage (U). For MMA welding the voltage required to initiate
the arc is OCV, the voltage measured between the output terminals of the
power source when no current is flowing through the welding circuit.
For safety reasons the OCV should not exceed 100V and is usually 50-90V.
Arc voltage is the voltage required to maintain the arc during welding and is
usually 20-40V and is a function of arc length. With MMA the welder controls
the arc length and therefore the arc voltage which in turn controls weld pool
fluidity.
11-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Manual Metal Arc/Shielded Metal Arc Welding (MMA/SMAW)
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
OCV 100V
Welding amperage
11-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Manual Metal Arc/Shielded Metal Arc Welding (MMA/SMAW)
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
When using DC the welding arc can be affected by arc blow, the deflection
of the arc from its normal path due to magnetic forces.
Rutile electrodes
Contain a high proportion of titanium oxide (rutile) in the coating, which
promotes easy arc ignition, smooth arc operation and low spatter. These
electrodes are general purpose with good welding properties and they can
be used with AC and DC power sources and in all positions. The electrodes
are especially suitable for welding fillet joints in the horizontal/vertical (HV)
position.
11-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Manual Metal Arc/Shielded Metal Arc Welding (MMA/SMAW)
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Features:
Moderate weld metal mechanical properties.
Good bead profile produced through the viscous slag.
Positional welding possible with a fluid slag (containing fluoride).
Easily removable slag.
Basic electrodes
Contain a high proportion of calcium carbonate (limestone) and calcium
fluoride (fluorspar) in the coating, making the slag coating more fluid than
rutile coatings, this is also fast freezing which assists welding in the vertical
and overhead positions. These electrodes are used for welding medium and
heavy section fabrications where higher weld quality, good mechanical
properties and resistance to cracking (due to high restraint) are required.
Features
Low hydrogen weld metal.
Requires high welding currents/speeds.
Poor bead profile (convex and coarse surface profile).
Slag removal difficult.
Cellulosic electrodes
Contain a high proportion of cellulose in the coating and are characterised
by a deeply penetrating arc and rapid burn-off rate giving high welding
speeds. Weld deposit can be coarse and with fluid slag, deslagging can be
difficult. These electrodes are easy to use in any position and are noted for
their use in the stovepipe welding technique.
Features
Deep penetration in all positions.
Suitability for vertical-down welding.
Reasonably good mechanical properties.
High level of hydrogen generated, risk of cracking in the HAZ.
11-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Manual Metal Arc/Shielded Metal Arc Welding (MMA/SMAW)
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Operating factor should not be confused with the term duty cycle, which is
a safety value given as the % of time a conductor can carry a current and is
given as a specific current at 60 and 100% of 10 minutes, ie 350A 60% and
300A 100%
11-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Manual Metal Arc/Shielded Metal Arc Welding (MMA/SMAW)
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Advantages:
Field or shop use.
Range of consumables.
All positional.
Very portable.
Simple equipment.
Disadvantages:
High skill factor required.
Arc strikes/slag inclusions.
Low operating factor.
High level of generated fumes.
Hydrogen control.
11-9
www.twitraining.com
Section 12
TIG Welding
Rev 1 November 2010
TIG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
12 TIG Welding
12.1 Process characteristics
In the US the TIG process is also called gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW).
TIG welding is a process where melting is produced by heating with an arc
struck between a non-consumable tungsten electrode and the workpiece.
An inert gas shields the electrode and weld zone to prevent oxidation of the
tungsten electrode and atmospheric contamination of the weld and hot filler
wire (as shown below).
Tungsten is used because it has a melting point of 3370C, well above any
other common metal.
Welding current.
Current type and polarity.
Travel speed.
Shape of tungsten electrode tip and vertex angle.
Shielding gas flow rate.
Electrode extension.
12-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
TIG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Current
DC-ve AC DC-ve
type/polarity
Heat 70% at work 50% at work 30% at work
balance 30% at electrode 50% at electrode 70% at electrode
Weld profile Deep, narrow Medium Shallow, wide
Cleaning No Yes every half cycle Yes
action
Electrode Excellent Good Poor
capacity (3.2mm/400A) (3.2mm/225A) (6.4mm/120A)
12-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
TIG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Pure tungsten electrodes are used when welding light metals with AC
because they maintain a clean balled end, but possess poor arc initiation
and stability in AC mode compared with other types.
Thoriated electrodes are alloyed with thorium oxide (thoria) to improve
arc initiation and have higher current carrying capacity than pure
tungsten electrodes and maintain a sharp tip for longer. Unfortunately,
thoria is slightly radioactive (emitting radiation) and the dust generated
during tip grinding should not be inhaled. Electrode grinding machines
used for thoriated tungsten grinding should be fitted with a dust
extraction system.
Ceriated and lanthaniated electrodes are alloyed with cerium and
lanthanum oxides, for the same reason as thoriated electrodes and
operate successfully with DC or AC and as cerium and lanthanum are
not radioactive, they have been used as replacements for thoriated
electrodes.
Zirconiated electrodes are alloyed with zirconium oxide with operating
characteristics between the thoriated types and pure tungsten. They are
able to retain a balled end during welding, so are recommended for AC
welding. They have a high resistance to contamination so are used for
high integrity welds where tungsten inclusions must be avoided.
12-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
TIG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Argon.
Helium.
Mixtures of argon and helium.
Note: For austenitic stainless steels and some cupro-nickel alloys, argon
with up to ~5% hydrogen improve penetration and reduce porosity.
12-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
TIG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Back purging
It is necessary to protect the back of the weld from excessive oxidation
during TIG welding, achieved by using a purge gas, usually pure argon.
For pipe welding, it is relatively easy to purge the pipe bore, but for
plate/sheet welding it is necessary to use a purge channel or sometimes
another operator positions and moves a back purge nozzle as the weld
progresses.
The initial stage of back purging is to exclude all the air at the back of the
weld and having allowed sufficient time for this the flow rate should be
reduced prior to starting to weld so there is positive flow (typically
~4 l/min).
Back purging should continue until two or more layers of weld have been
deposited.
12-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
TIG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Electrode
extension
Stickout
If the electrode extension is too short, the electrode tip will not be
adequately heated leading to an unstable arc.
If the electrode extension is too long, the electrode tip might overheat,
causing melting and lead to tungsten inclusions.
As a general rule, stickout length should be 2-3 times the electrode
diameter.
Thermal shock to the tungsten causing small fragments to enter the weld
pool is a common cause of tungsten inclusions and is why modern power
sources have a current slope-up device to minimise this risk.
This device allows the current to rise to the set value over a short period so
the tungsten is heated more slowly and gently.
12-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
TIG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Using filler wires, TIG is used for making high quality joints in heavier gauge
pipe and tubing for the chemical, petroleum and power generating
industries.
It is also used in the aerospace industry for items such as airframes and
rocket motor cases.
12.8 Disadvantages
Gives low deposition rates compared with other arc welding processes.
Need higher dexterity and welder co-ordination than with MIG/MAG or
MMA welding.
Less economical than MMA or MIG/MAG for sections thicker than
~10mm.
Difficult to fully shield the weld zone in draughty conditions so may not
be suitable for site/field welding.
Tungsten inclusions can occur if the electrode contacts the weld pool.
No cleaning action so low tolerance for contaminants on filler or base
metals.
12-7
www.twitraining.com
Section 13
13 MIG/MAG Welding
13.1 Process
Known in the US as gas metal arc welding (GMAW), the MIG/MAG welding
process shown in Figure 13.1 is a versatile technique suitable for both thin
sheet and thick section components in most metallic materials. An arc is
struck between the end of a wire electrode and the workpiece, melting both
to form a weld pool and the wire serves as the source of heat (via the arc at
the wire tip) and filler metal for the joint. The wire is fed through a copper
contact tube (also called a contact tip) which conducts welding current into
the wire. The weld pool is protected from the surrounding atmosphere by a
shielding gas fed through a nozzle surrounding the wire. Shielding gas
selection depends on the material being welded and the application. The
wire is fed from a reel by a motor drive and the welder or machine moves
the welding gun or torch along the joint line. The process offers high
productivity and is economical because the consumable wire is continuously
fed.
13-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Advantages:
Continuous wire feed.
Automatic self-regulation of the arc length.
High deposition rate and minimal number of stop/start locations.
High consumable efficiency.
Heat inputs in the range 0.1-2kJ/mm.
Low hydrogen potential process.
Welder has good visibility of weld pool and joint line.
Little or no post-weld cleaning.
Can be used in all positions (dip transfer).
Good process control possibilities.
Wide range of application.
Disadvantages:
No independent control of filler addition.
Difficult to set up optimum parameters to minimise spatter levels.
Risk of lack of fusion when using dip transfer on thicker weldments.
High level of equipment maintenance.
Lower heat input can lead to high hardness values.
Higher equipment cost than MMA welding.
Site welding requires special precautions to exclude draughts which may
disturb the gas shield.
Joint and part access is not as good as MMA or TIG welding.
Cleanliness of base metal, slag processes tolerate greater contamination.
13-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
13.2.2 Voltage
The most important setting in spray transfer as it controls the arc length. In
dip transfer it also affects the rise of current and the overall heat input into
the weld. An increase of both wire feed speed/
current and voltage will increase heat input. The welding connections need
to be checked for soundness as any loose connections will result in
resistance and cause the voltage to drop in the circuit and will affect the
characteristic of the welding arc. The voltage will affect the type of transfer
achievable but this is also highly dependent on the type of gas being used.
a) b) c)
13-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
13.2.3 Gases
Ar Ar-He He CO2
Figure 13.4 Gas composition effect on weld bead profile.
For non-ferrous metals and their alloys (such as Al, Ni and Cu) an inert
shielding gas must be used, usually either pure argon or an argon rich gas
with a helium addition. The use of a fully inert gas is why the process is also
called metal inert gas (MIG) welding and for precise use of terminology this
should only be used when referring to the welding of non-ferrous metals.
100%CO2
CO2 gas cannot sustain spray transfer as the ionisation potential of the gas
is too high,l it gives very good penetration but promotes globular droplet
transfer also a very unstable arc and lots of spatter.
Argon +15-20%CO2
The percentage of CO2 or oxygen depends on the type of steel being
welded and the mode of metal transfer used. Argon has a much lower
ionisation potential and can sustain spray transfer above 24 welding volts.
Argon gives a very stable arc, little spatter but lower penetration than CO2.
Argon and 5-20%CO2 gas mixtures give of the benefit of both gases ie good
penetration with a stable arc and very little spatter. CO2 gas is much
cheaper than argon or its mixtures and is widely used for carbon and some
low alloy steels.
13-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Argon +1-5%CO2
Widely used for stainless steels and some low alloy steels.
Figure 14.5 Active shielding gas mixtures for MAG welding of carbon, C-Mn and
low alloy steels. Blue is a cooler and red a hotter mixture gas.
Gas mixtures with helium instead of argon give a hotter arc, more fluid weld
pool and better weld profile. These quaternary mixtures permit higher
welding speeds but may not be suitable for thin sections.
Stainless steels
Austenitic stainless steels are typically welded with argon-CO2/O2 mixtures
for spray transfer or argon-helium-CO2 mixtures for all modes of transfer.
The oxidising potential of the mixtures are kept to a minimum (2-2.5%
maximum CO2 content) to stabilise the arc, but with minimum effect on
corrosion performance. Because austenitic steels have a low thermal
conductivity, the addition of helium helps to avoid lack of fusion defects and
overcome the high heat dissipation into the material. Helium additions are
up to 85%, compared with ~25% for mixtures used for carbon and low alloy
steels. CO2-containing mixtures are sometimes avoided to eliminate
potential carbon pick-up.
13-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Figure 13.6 Active shielding gas mixtures for MAG welding of stainless steels. Blue
is a cooler and; red a hotter gas mixture.
Argon
Can be used for aluminium because there is sufficient surface oxide
available to stabilise the arc. For materials sensitive to oxygen, such as
titanium and nickel alloys, arc stability may be difficult to achieve with inert
gases in some applications. The density of argon is approximately 1.4 times
that of air. So in the downhand position, the relatively heavy argon is very
effective at displacing air. A disadvantage is when working in confined
spaces there is a risk of argon building up to dangerous levels and
asphyxiating the welder.
Argon-helium mixtures
Argon is most commonly used for MIG welding of light alloys, but some
advantage can be gained by use of helium and argon/helium mixtures.
Helium possesses a higher thermal conductivity than argon and the hotter
weld pool produces improved penetration and/or an increase in welding
speed. High helium contents give a deep broad penetration profile but
produce high spatter levels. With less than 80% argon a true spray transfer
is not possible. With globular-type transfer, the welder should use a buried
arc to minimise spatter. Arc stability can be problematic in helium and
argon-helium mixtures, since helium raises the arc voltage and therefore
there is a larger change in arc voltage with respect to arc length. Helium
mixtures require higher flow rates than argon shielding to provide the same
gas protection.
13-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Figure 13.7 Inert shielding gas mixtures for MIG welding of aluminium,
magnesium, titanium, nickel and copper alloys. Blue is a cooler and; red a hotter
gas mixture.)
13-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Summary of shielding gases and mixtures used for different base materials
for MIG/MAG welding.
Shielding Reaction
Metal Characteristics
gas behaviour
Carbon Argon-CO2 Slightly Increasing CO2 content gives hotter arc,
steel oxidising improved arc stability, deeper penetration,
transition from finger-type to bowl-shaped
penetration profile, more fluid weld pool giving
flatter weld bead with good wetting, increased
spatter levels, better toughness than CO2.
Minimum 80% argon for axial spray transfer.
General purpose mixture: Argon-10-15%CO2.
Argon-O2 Slightly Stiffer arc than Ar-CO2 mixtures minimises
oxidising undercutting, suited to spray transfer mode,
lower penetration than Ar-CO2 mixtures, finger-
type weld bead penetration at high current
levels. General purpose mixture: Argon-3%
CO2.
Ar-He-CO2 Slightly Substitution of helium for argon gives hotter arc,
oxidising higher arc voltage, more fluid weld pool, flatter
bead profile, more bowl-shaped and deeper
penetration profile and higher welding speeds,
compared with Ar-CO2 mixtures. High cost.
CO2 Oxidising Arc voltages 2-3V higher than Ar-CO2 mixtures,
best penetration, higher welding speeds, dip
transfer or buried arc technique only, narrow
working range, high spatter levels, low cost.
Stainless He-Ar-CO2 Slightly Good arc stability with minimum effect on
steels oxidising corrosion resistance (carbon pick-up), higher
helium contents designed for dip transfer, lower
helium contents designed for pulse and spray
transfer. General purpose gas: He-Ar-2%CO2.
Argon-O2 Slightly Spray transfer only, minimises undercutting on
oxidising heavier sections, good bead profile.
Aluminium, Argon Inert Good arc stability, low spatter and general-
copper, purpose gas. Titanium alloys require inert gas
nickel, backing and trailing shields to prevent air
titanium contamination.
alloys AR-He Inert Higher heat input offsets high heat dissipation
on thick sections, lower risk of lack of fusion
defects, higher spatter and higher cost than
argon.
13-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Figure 13.8 The effect of travel speed. As travel speed increases, reducing
penetration and width, undercut.
13-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Contact tip
Gas nozzle
Contact tip
setback
Electrode Contact
Nozzle-to- extension tip to work
work (stand-
Arc length distance
off) distance
Workpiece
Figure 13.10 Contact tip to workpiece distance; electrode extension and nozzle to
workpiece distance.
13-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Increased extension
At short CTWDs, radiated heat from the weld pool can cause overheating of
the contact tube and welding torch which can lead to spatter adherence and
increased wear of the contact tube.
13-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Joint access and type should also be considered when selecting the
required gas nozzle and flow rate. Too small a nozzle may cause it to
become obstructed by spatter more quickly and, if the wire bends on leaving
the contact tube, the shielding envelope and arc location may not coincide.
13-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
In dip transfer the wire short-circuits the arc 50-200 times/second and this
type of transfer is normally achieved with CO2 or mixtures of CO2 and argon
gas + low amps and welding volts <24V.
Spray transfer occurs at high currents and voltages. Above the transition
current, metal transfer is of a fine spray of small droplets projected across
the arc with low spatter levels. The high welding current produces strong
electromagnetic forces (the pinch effect) that cause the molten filament
supporting the droplet to neck down. Droplets detach from the tip of the wire
and accelerate across the arc gap. The frequency at which the droplets
detach increases with increasing current. The droplet size equates to the
wire diameter at the threshold level but decreases significantly as the
welding current increases. At very high currents (wire feed speeds), the
molten droplets can start to rotate (rotating transfer). The arc current is
flowing for the entire period of the drop detachment, resulting in maximum
penetration and a high heat input. When the correct arc voltage to give
spray transfer is used, the arc is short with the wire tip 1-3mm from the
surface of the plate.
With steels it can be used only in downhand butts and H/V fillet welds but
gives higher deposition rate, penetration and fusion than dip transfer
because of the continuous arc heating. It is mainly used for steel plate
thicknesses >3mm but has limited use for positional welding due to the
potential large weld pool involved.
13-13
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Pulsing the welding current extends the range of spray transfer operation
well below the natural transition from dip to spray transfer. This allows
smooth, spatter-free spray transfer at mean currents below the transition
level, eg 50-150A and at lower heat inputs. Pulsing was introduced originally
control metal transfer by imposing artificial cyclic operation on the arc
system by applying alternately high and low currents.
A typical pulsed waveform and the main pulse welding variables are shown
in Figure 13.17. A low background current (typically 20-80A) is supplied to
maintain the arc, keep the wire tip molten, give stable anode and cathode
roots and maintain average current during the cycle. Droplet detachment
occurs during a high current pulse at current levels above the transition
current level. The pulse of current generates very high electromagnetic
forces which cause a strong pinch effect on the metal filament supporting
the droplet the droplet is detached and projected across the arc gap. Pulse
current and current density must be sufficiently high to ensure that spray
transfer (not globular) always occurs so that positional welding can be used.
13-14
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Pulse transfer uses pulses of current to fire a single globule of metal across
the arc gap at a frequency of 50-300 pulses/second. It is a development of
spray transfer that gives positional welding capability for steels, combined
with controlled heat input, good fusion and high productivity and may be
used for all sheet steel thickness >1mm, but is mainly used for positional
welding of steels >6mm.
The globular transfer range occupies the transitional range of arc voltage
between free-flight and fully short-circuiting transfer. Irregular droplet
transfer and arc instability are inherent, particularly when operating near the
transition threshold. In globular transfer, a molten droplet several times the
electrode diameter forms on the wire tip, gravity eventually detaches it when
its weight overcomes surface tension forces and transfer takes place often
with excessive spatter. Before transfer the arc wanders and its cone covers
a large area, dissipating energy.
There is a short duration short-circuit when the droplet contacts with the
molten pool but rather than causing droplet transfer, it occurs as a result of
it. Although the short-circuit is of very short duration, some inductance is
necessary to reduce spatter, although to the operator the short-circuits are
not discernible and the arc has the appearance of a free-flight type.
13-15
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
13.2.9 Inductance
When MIG/MAG welding in the dip transfer mode, the welding electrode
touches the weld pool, causing a short-circuit, during which the arc voltage
is nearly zero. If the constant voltage power supply responded instantly,
very high current would immediately begin to flow through the welding circuit
and the rapid rise in current to a high value would melt the short-circuited
electrode free with explosive force, dispelling the weld metal and causing
considerable spatter.
Inductance is the property in an electrical circuit that slows down the rate of
current rise (Figure 13.18). The current travelling through an inductance coil
creates a magnetic field which creates a current in the welding circuit in
opposition to the welding current. Increasing the inductance will also
increase the arc time and decrease the frequency of short-circuiting.
Current
There is an optimum value of inductance for each electrode feed rate,. Too
little results in excessive spatter too much, and current will not rise fast
enough and the molten tip of the electrode is not heated sufficiently causing
the electrode to stub into the base metal. Modern electronic power sources
automatically set inductance to give a smooth arc and metal transfer.
13-16
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
1
10
9 2
3
7
6
5
13-17
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
2 3
13-18
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
4
5
1 Torch body.
2 On/off or latching switch.
3 Spot welding spacer attachment.
4 Contact tips.
5 Gas diffuser.
6 Gas shrouds.
7 Torch head assembly (minus the shroud).
13-19
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The higher the level of de-oxidants in the wire, the lower the chance of
occurrence of porosity in the weld. The quality of the wire winding, copper
coating and temper are also important factors in minimising wire feed
problems.
Check that the liner is the correct type and size for the wire. One size of liner
will generally fit two sizes of wire, ie 0.6 and 0.8, 1 and 1.2, 1.4 and 1.6mm
diameter. Steel liners are used for steel wires and Teflon for aluminium
wires.
13.4.5 Connections
The electric arc length in MIG/MAG welding is controlled by the voltage
settings, achieved by using a constant voltage volt/amp characteristic inside
the equipment. Any poor connection in the welding circuit will affect the
nature and stability of the electric arc so is a major inspection point.
13-20
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The cored wire consists of a metal sheath containing a granular flux. which
flux can contain elements that would normally be used in MMA electrodes
so the process has a very wide range of applications.
Most wires are sealed mechanically and hermetically with various forms of
joint. The effectiveness of the were joint is an inspection point of cored wire
welding as moisture can easily be absorbed into a damaged or poor seam.
Baking of cored wires is ineffective and will not restore the condition of a
contaminated flux within a wire.
13-21
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
MIG/MAG Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Note: Unlike MMA electrodes the potential hydrogen levels and mechanical
properties of welds with rutile wires can equal those of the basic types.
Advantages Disadvantages
High productivity Lack of fusion (dip transfer)
Easily automated Small range of consumables
All positional (dip, pulse and FCAW) Protection for site working
Material thickness range Complex equipment
Continuous electrode High ozone levels
13-22
www.twitraining.com
Section 14
Submerged arc welding is noted for its ability to were high weld currents
(owing to the properties and functions of the flux), which give deep
penetration and high deposition rates. Generally a DC+ve used up to about
1000A because it produces deep penetration. On some applications (ie
cladding operations) DC-ve is needed to reduce penetration and dilution. At
higher currents or with multiple electrode systems, AC is often preferred to
avoid the problem of arc blow (when used with multiple electrode systems,
DC+ve is used for the lead arc and ACfor the trail arc).
14-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Submerged Arc Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Materials joined
Welding of carbon steels.
Welding low alloy steels (eg fine grained and creep resisting).
Welding stainless steels.
Welding nickel alloys.
Cladding to base metals to improve wear and corrosion resistance.
14.2 Fluxes
Flux may be defined as granular mineral compounds mixed to various
formulations.
Type of fluxes
Fused Agglomerated
14-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Submerged Arc Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Fused fluxes are produced by the constituents being dry mixed, melted in an
electric furnace then granulated by pouring the molten mixture into water or
on to an ice block. Subsequently, these particles are crushed and screened
to yield a uniform glass-like product.
Welding current.
Type of flux and particle distribution.
Arc voltage.
Travel speed.
Electrode size.
Electrode extension.
Type of electrode.
14-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Submerged Arc Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Arc voltage effect on weld profile 2.4mm electrode diameter, 500A welding
current and 61cm/min travel speed.
Increasing the arc voltage with constant current and travel speed will:
14-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Submerged Arc Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Reducing the arc voltage with constant current and travel speed will produce
a stiffer arc which improves penetration in a deep weld groove and resists
arc blow.
Deposition rate
At any given amperage setting, a small diameter electrode will have a
higher current density and deposition rate of molten metal than a larger
diameter electrode. However, a larger diameter electrode can carry more
current than a smaller one, so the larger electrode can ultimately
produce a higher deposition rate at higher amperage.
14-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Submerged Arc Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
14-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Submerged Arc Welding
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
14-7
www.twitraining.com
Section 15
Heating flame
Slag jet
Oxy-fuel cutting.
These two conditions are fulfilled by carbon steels and some low alloy
steels. However, the oxides of many of the alloying elements in steels, such
as aluminium and chromium have melting points higher than those of iron
oxides. These high melting point oxides (which are refractory in nature!)
may shield the material in the kerf so that fresh iron is not continuously
exposed to the cutting oxygen stream, leading to a decrease of the cutting
speed and ultimately an unstable process. In practice, the process is
15-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Thermal Cutting Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Advantages
Steels can generally be cut faster than by most machining methods.
Section shapes and thicknesses difficult to produce by mechanical
means can be cut economically.
Basic equipment costs are low compared machine tools.
Manual equipment is very portable and can be used on site.
Cutting direction can be changed rapidly on a small radius.
Large plates can be cut rapidly in place by moving the torch rather than
the plate.
Economical method of plate edge preparation.
Disadvantages
Dimensional tolerances significantly poorer than machine tool
capabilities.
Process essentially limited to cutting carbon and low alloy steels.
Preheat flame and expelled red hot slag present fire and burn hazards to
plant and personnel.
Fuel combustion and oxidation of the metal require proper fume control
and adequate ventilation.
Hardenable steels may require pre and/or post-heat adjacent to the cut
edges to control their metallurgical structures and mechanical properties.
Special process modifications are needed for cutting high alloy steels
and cast irons (ie iron powder or flux addition).
Being a thermal process, expansion and shrinkage of the components
during and after cutting must be taken into account.
The preheating flame has the following functions in the cutting operation:
15-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Thermal Cutting Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Some of the more common fuel gases used are acetylene, natural gas
(methane), propane, propylene and methylacetylene propadiene (MAPP)
gas.
15-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Thermal Cutting Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The face of a satisfactory cut has a sharp top edge, drag lines, which are
fine and even, little oxide and a sharp bottom edge. Underside is free of
slag.
A satisfactory cut is shown in the centre. If the cut is too slow (left) the top
edge is melted, there are deep grooves in the lower portion of the face,
scaling is heavy and the bottom edge may be rough, with adherent dross. If
the cut is too fast (right) the appearance is similar, with an irregular cut
edge. Plate thickness 12mm.
With a very fast travel speed the drag lines are coarse and at an angle to
the surface with an excessive amount of slag sticking to the bottom edge of
the plate, due to the oxygen jet trailing with insufficient oxygen reaching the
bottom of the cut.
15-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Thermal Cutting Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A satisfactory cut is shown in the centre. If the preheating flame is too low
(left) the most noticeable effect on the cut edge is deep gouges in the lower
part of the cut face. If the preheating flame is too high (right) the top edge is
melted, the cut irregular and there is an excess of adherent dross. Plate
thickness 12mm.
A satisfactory cut is shown in the centre. If the blowpipe nozzle is too high
above the work (left) excessive melting of the top edge occurs with much
oxide. If the torch travel speed is irregular (right) uneven spacing of the drag
lines can be observed together with an irregular bottom surface and
adherent oxide. Plate thickness 12mm.
15-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Thermal Cutting Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Advantages
Not limited to materials which are electrical conductors so is widely used
for cutting all types of stainless steels, non-ferrous materials and non-
electrical conductive materials.
Operates at a much higher energy level compared with oxy-fuel cutting
resulting in faster cutting speeds.
Instant start-up is particularly advantageous for interrupted cutting allows
cutting without preheat.
Disadvantages
Dimensional tolerances significantly poorer than machine tool
capabilities.
Introduces hazards such as fire, electric shock (due to the high OCV),
intense light, fumes, gases and noise levels that may not be present with
other processes. However, in underwater cutting the level of fumes, UV
radiation and noise are reduced to a low level.
Compared with oxy-fuel cutting, plasma arc cutting equipment tends to
be more expensive and requires a fairly large amount of electric power.
Being a thermal process, expansion and shrinkage of the components
during and after cutting must be taken into consideration.
Cut edges slightly tapered.
15-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Thermal Cutting Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
a) b)
15-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Thermal Cutting Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Advantages
Approximately five times faster than chipping.
Easily controllable, removes defects with precision. Defects are clearly
visible and may be followed with ease. The depth of cut is easily
regulated and slag does not deflect or hamper the cutting action.
Low equipment cost-no gas cylinders or regulators necessary except on
site.
Economical to operate, no oxygen or fuel gas required. The welder may
also do the gouging (no qualification requirements for this operation).
Easy to operate, the equipment is similar to MMA except the torch and
air supply hose.
Compact, the torch is not much larger than an MMA electrode holder,
allowing work in confined areas.
Versatile.
Can be automated.
Disadvantages
Other cutting processes usually produce a better and quicker cut.
Requires a large volume of compressed air.
Increases the carbon content leading to an increase in hardness in of
cast iron and hardenable metals. In stainless steels it can lead to carbide
precipitation and sensitisation, so grinding of the carbide layer usually
follows arc air gouging.
Introduces hazards such as fire (due to discharge of sparks and molten
metal), fumes, noise and intense light.
15-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Thermal Cutting Processes
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
When correctly applied, MMA gouging can produce relatively clean gouged
surfaces. For general applications, welding can be carried out without the
need to dress by grinding, however when gouging stainless steel, a thin
layer of higher carbon content material will be produced which should be
removed by grinding.
15-9
www.twitraining.com
Section 16
Welding Consumables
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
16 Welding Consumables
Welding consumables are defined as all that is used up during the
production of a weld.
This list could include all things used up in the production of a weld;
however, we normally refer to welding consumables as those items used up
by a particular welding process.
These are:
SAW
FUSED
Flux
Size.
Type or specification.
Condition.
Storage.
16-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Some basic electrodes may be tipped with a carbon compound which eases
arc ignition.
16-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
16-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Mandatory
designation:
Covered electrode
Minimum
yield strength
Charpy V notch
minimum test
temperature C
Chemical composition
Electrode covering
Optional designation:
Positional designation
Diffusible hydrogen
ml/100g weld metal
16-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Mandatory
designation:
Covered electrode
Minimum
tensile strength
Electrode covering
Chemical composition
Heat treatment
condition
Optional designation:
Optional supplemental
impact test at 47Jat
same test temperature
given for 27J test
Diffusible hydrogen
ml/100g weld metal
16-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Method A
Minimum yield Tensile strength, Minimum E% b,
Symbol N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2
35 355 440-570 22
38 380 470-600 20
42 420 500-640 20
46 460 530-680 20
50 500 560-720 18
Lower yield Rel shall be used. b Gauge length = 5 x
Method B
Symbol Minimum tensile strength, N/mm2
43 430
49 490
55 550
57 570
Method A
Symbol Temperature for the minimum
average impact energy of 47J
Z No requirement
A +20
0 0
2 -20
3 -30
4 -40
5 -50
6 -60
Method B
Impact or Charpy V notch testing temperature at 27J temperature in
method B is again determined through the classification of tensile strength,
electrode covering and alloying elements (Table 8B) ie a E 55 16-N7 which
must reach 27J at 75C.
16-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Method A
Method B
16-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Hydrogen scales
Diffusible hydrogen is indicated in the same way in both methods, where
after baking the amount of hydrogen is given as ml/100g weld metal ie H 5
= 5ml/100g weld metal.
16-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
C Electrode coating and electrical characteristic D AWS A5.5 low alloy steels
Code Coating Current type Symbol Approximate alloy deposit
A1 0.5%Mo
Exx10 Cellulosic/organic DC + only
B1 0.5%Cr + 0.5%Mo
Exx11 Cellulosic/organic AC or DC+ B2 1.25%Cr + 0.5%Mo
Exx12 Rutile AC or DC- B3 2.25%Cr + 1.0%Mo
Exx13 Rutile + 30% Fe powder AC or DC+/- B4 2.0%Cr+ 0.5%Mo
Exx14 Rutile AC or DC+/- B5 0.5%Cr + 1.0%Mo
Exx15 Basic DC + only C1 2.5%Ni
Exx16 Basic AC or DC+ C2 3.25%Ni
Exx18 Basic + 25% Fe powder AC or DC+ 1%Ni + 0.35%Mo +
Exx20 High Fe oxide content AC or DC+/- C3
0.15%Cr
Exx24 Rutile + 50% Fe powder AC or DC+/- D1/2 0.25-0.45%Mo + 0.15%Cr
Exx27 Mineral + 50% Fe powder AC or DC+/- 0.5%Ni or/and 0.3%Cr
Exx28 Basic + 50% Fe powder AC or DC+ G or/and 0.2%Mo or/and
0.1%V
For G only 1 element is required
16-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Type (specification)
Correct specification/code
16.1.1 E 46
3B
Checks should also be made to ensure that basic electrodes have been
through the correct pre-use procedure. Having been baked to the correct
temperature (typically 300-350C) for 1 hour then held in a holding oven
(150C max) basic electrodes are issued to welders in heated quivers.
Most electrode flux coatings deteriorate rapidly when damp so care must be
taken to inspect storage facilities to ensure they are adequately dry and that
all electrodes are stored in controlled humidity.
Vacuum packed electrodes may be used directly from the carton only if the
vacuum has been maintained. Directions for hydrogen control are always
given on the carton and should be strictly adhered to. The cost of each
electrode is insignificant compared with the cost of any repair, so basic
electrodes left in the heated quiver after the days shift may potentially be
rebaked but would normally be discarded to avoid the risk of H2 induced
problems.
16-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
In the US helium occurs naturallyso it is the gas more often used. Helium
produces a deeper penetrating arc than argon but is less dense (lighter)
than air and needs 2-3 times the flow rate of argon to produce sufficient
cover to the weld area when welding downhand. Argon is denser (heavier)
than air so is less gas needs to be used in the downhand position. Mixtures
of argon and helium are often used to balance the properties of the arc and
the shielding cover ability of the gas. Gases for TIG/GTA need to be of the
highest purity (99.99%). Careful attention and inspection must be given to
the purging and condition of gas hoses as contamination of the shielding
gas can occur due to a worn or withered hose.
16-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The main purpose of the copper coating of steel MIG/MAG welding wire is to
maximise current pick-up at the contact tip and reduce the level of
coefficient of friction in the liner with protection against the effects of
corrosion being a secondary function.
Wires are available that have not been copper coated as copper flaking in
the liner can cause many wire feed problems. These wires may be coated in
a graphite compound, which again increases current pick-up and reduces
friction in the liner. Some wires, including many cored wires, are nickel
coated.
Wires are available in sizes from 0.6-1.6mm diameter with finer wires
available on a 1kg reel, though most wires are supplied on a 15kg drum.
Argon + MAG Spray or pulse welding Active additive gives good fluidity
1-2% O2 or of austenitic or ferritic to the molten stainless and
CO2 stainless steels only improves toe blend.
Electrode wires for welding other alloy steels are generally graded by
chemical composition in a table in a similar way to MIG and TIG electrode
wires. Fluxes for SAW are graded by their manufacture and composition
and there are two normal methods of manufacture known, fused and
agglomerated.
16-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Fused fluxes
Are mixed together and baked at a very high temperature (>1,000C) so all
the components fuse. When cooled the resultant mass resembles a sheet of
coloured glass, which is then pulverised into small particles.
Agglomerated fluxes
A mixture of compounds baked at a much lower temperature and are
essentially bonded together by bonding agents into small particles.
Recognition of these fluxes is easier as they are dull, generally round
granules that are friable (easily crushed) and can also be coloured. Many
agents and compounds may be added during manufacture unlike the fused
fluxes. Agglomerated fluxes tend to be of the basic type and will produce
weld metal of an improved quality in terms of strength and toughness, at the
expense of usability as these fluxes are much less tolerant of poor surface
conditions and generally produce a slag much more difficult to detach and
remove.
16-13
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The weld metal properties result from using a particular wire, with a
particular flux, in a particular weld sequence so the grading of SAW
consumables is given as a function of a wire/flux combination and
welding sequence.
Tensile strength.
Elongation, %.
Toughness, joules.
Toughness testing temperature.
All consumables for SAW (wires and fluxes) should be stored in a dry,
humid-free atmosphere. The flux manufacturers handling/storage
instruction and conditions must be very strictly followed to minimise any
moisture pick-up. Any re-use of fluxes is totally dependent on applicable
clauses within the application standard.
16-14
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Welding Consumables
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Exercises
43 2
1 1Ni ________________________
RR 6
3 H15
Fused: Agglomerated:
16-15
www.twitraining.com
Section 17
Weldability of Steels
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
17 Weldability of Steels
17.1 Introduction
Weldability simply means the ability to be welded and many types of
weldable steel have been developed for a wide range of applications.
WPSs give welding conditions that do not cause cracking but achieve
the specified properties.
Welders work strictly in accordance with the specified welding
conditions.
Welding inspectors regularly monitor welders to ensure they are working
strictly in accordance with the WPSs.
17-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Cold cracking Cracks occur when the weld has cooled down.
HAZ cracking Cracks occur mainly in the HAZ.
Delayed cracking Cracks may occur some time after welding has
finished (possibly up to ~72h).
Underbead cracking Cracks occur in the HAZ beneath a weld bead.
Although most hydrogen cracks occur in the HAZ, there are circumstances
when they may form in weld metal.
Figure 17.2 Hydrogen induced cold crack that initiated at the HAZ at the toe of a
fillet weld.
17-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Susceptible
microstructure
CRACKING
Tensile (at room Temperature
stress Temperature)
High hydrogen
concentration
Because H atoms are very small they can move about (diffuse) in solid steel
and while weld metal is hot can diffuse to the weld surface and escape into
the atmosphere.
17-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Methods to minimise the influence of each of the four factors are considered
in the following sub-sections.
Hydrogen
The main source of hydrogen is moisture (H2O) and the principal source
being welding flux. Some fluxes contain cellulose and this can be a very
active source of hydrogen.
Welding processes that do not require flux can be regarded as low hydrogen
processes.
Other sources of hydrogen are moisture present in rust or scale and oils and
greases (hydrocarbons).
Tensile stress
There are always tensile stresses acting on a weld because there are
always residual stresses from welding.
17-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The only practical ways of reducing the influence of residual stresses may
be by:
These measures are particularly important when welding some low alloy
steels that are particularly sensitive to hydrogen cracking.
For C and C-Mn steels a formula has been developed to assess how the
chemical composition will influence the tendency for significant HAZ
hardening the carbon equivalent value (CEV) formula.
The CEV formula most widely used (and adopted by IIW) is:
%
M 6
n
%
C
r
% 5
M
o
%
V
%
N
i 1
% 5
C
u
C
E
VI
%
C
I
W
17-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The element with most influence on HAZ hardness is carbon. The faster the
rate of HAZ cooling after each weld run, the greater the tendency for
hardening.
Procuring steel with a CEV at the low end of the range for the steel
grade (limited scope of effectiveness).
Using moderate welding heat input so that the weld does not cool quickly
(and give HAZ hardening).
Applying preheat so that the HAZ cools more slowly (and does not show
significant HAZ hardening); in multi-run welds maintain a specific
interpass temperature.
The CEV formula is not applicable to low alloy steels, with additions of
elements such as Cr, Mo and V. The HAZ of these steels will always tend to
be relatively hard regardless of heat input and preheat and so this is a factor
that cannot be effectively controlled to reduce the risk of H cracking. This is
why some of the low alloy steels have a greater tendency to show hydrogen
cracking than in weldable C and C-Mn steels which enable HAZ hardness to
be controlled.
17-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Transverse
cracks
Y
a)
b)
Figure 17. 3
a) Plan view of a plate butt weld showing subsurface transverse cracks;
b) Longitudinal section X-Y of the above weld showing how the transverse cracks
lie at 45o to the surface. They tend to remain within an individual weld run and may
be in weld several layers.
17-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Their appearance in this orientation gives the name chevron cracks (arrow-
shaped cracks). There are not any well defined rules for avoiding weld metal
hydrogen cracks apart from:
17-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
a)
b)
Figure 17.4.
a) Solidification crack at the weld centre where columnar dendrites have trapped
some lower melting point liquid;
b) The weld bead does not have an ideal shape but has solidified without the
dendrites meeting end-on and trapping lower melting point liquid thereby resisting
solidification cracking.
17-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Sulphur and copper can make steel weld metal sensitive to solidification
cracking if they are present in the weld at relatively high levels. Sulphur
contamination may lead to the formation of iron sulphides that remain liquid
when the bead has cooled down as low as ~980C, whereas bead
solidification started at above 1400C.
17-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Figure 17.5 shows a weld bead that has solidified under unfavourable
welding conditions associated with centreline solidification cracking.
D W/D1:2
The weld bead has a cross-section that is quite deep and narrow a width-
to-depth ratio greater than 1:2 and the solidifying dendrites have pushed the
lower melting point liquid to the centre of the bead where it has become
trapped. Since the surrounding material is shrinking as a result of cooling,
this film would be subjected to tensile stress, which leads to cracking.
In contrast, Figure 17.6 shows a bead that has a width-to-depth ratio less
than 1:2. This bead shape shows lower melting point liquid pushed ahead of
the solidifying dendrites but it does not become trapped at the bead centre,
thus, even under tensile stresses resulting from cooling, this film is self-
healing and cracking avoided.
17-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Direction
of travel
Figure 17.6 Weld bead with favourable width-to-depth ratio. The dendrites push
the lowest melting point metal towards the surface at the centre of the bead centre
so it does not form a weak central zone.
SAW and spray-transfer GMA are the arc welding processes most likely to
give weld beads with an unfavourable width-to-depth ratio. Also, electron
beam and laser welding processes are extremely sensitive to this kind of
cracking as a result of the deep, narrow beads produced.
TIG welding, use a current slope-out device so that the current and weld
pool depth gradually reduce before the arc is extinguished (gives more
favourable weld bead width-to-depth ratio). It is also a common practice
to backtrack the bead slightly before breaking the arc or lengthen the arc
gradually to avoid the crater cracks.
Modify weld pool solidification mode by feeding the filler wire into the
pool until solidification is almost complete and avoiding a concave crater.
MMA welding; modify the weld pool solidification mode by reversing the
direction of travel at the end of the weld run so that crater is filled.
17-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Fusion
boundary
HAZ
Crack propagation by
tearing of ligaments between
Through-thickness De-cohesion of de-cohesion inclusion stringers
- inclusion stringers
residual stresses
from welding
Inclusion
stringer
Figure 17.7
a)Typical lamellar tear located just outside the visible HAZ;
b) Step-like crack that is characteristic of a lamellar tear.
17-13
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
17-14
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Plate surface
Through-
thickness
tensile test
piece
Reduction of
diameter at point
of fracture
Plate surface
Figure 17.8 Round tensile test piece taken with its axis in the short-transverse
direction (through-thickness of plate) to measure the %R of A and assess
resistance to lamellar tearing.
Using clean steel that has low sulphur content (<~0.015%) and
consequently relatively few inclusions.
Procuring steel plate that has been subjected to through-thickness
tensile testing to demonstrate good through-thickness ductility (as
EN 10164).
Through-thickness stress
Through-thickness stress in T, K and Y joints is principally the residual
stress from welding, although the additional service stress may have some
influence.
17-15
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Figure 17.9 Reducing the effective size of a weld will reduce the through-thickness
stress on the susceptible plate and may be sufficient to reduce the risk of lamellar
tearing.
susceptible plate
Susceptible plate extruded section
Extruded section
Figure 17.10 Lamellar tearing can be avoided by changing the joint design.
17-16
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Weld metal
buttering
Susceptible plate
Figure 17.11 Two layers of weld metal (usually by MMA) applied to susceptible
plate before the T butt is made.
Appearance
Called weld decay because a narrow zone in the HAZ can be severely
corroded but surrounding areas (weld and parent metal) may not be
affected.
Sensitive HAZ.
Corrosive liquid in contact with the sensitive HAZ, in service.
17-17
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weldability of Steels
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Service environment
Corrosion of HAZ determined by service conditions, type of chemicals
and temperature.
Problem not solved by trying to address service conditions but by
selection of material, taking account of effects of welding/welding
parameters.
Chromium migrates to
site of growing carbide
17-18
www.twitraining.com
Section 18
Weld Repairs
Rev 1 November 2010
Weld Repairs
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
18 Weld Repairs
18.1 Two specific areas of weld repairs
Production.
In-service.
The reasons for making a repair are many and varied, from the removal of
weld defects induced during manufacture to a quick and temporary running-
repair to an item of production plant. The subject of welding repairs is also
wide and varied and often confused with maintenance and refurbishment
where the work can be scheduled.
A number of key factors need to be considered before any repair. The most
important being it is financially worthwhile. Before this judgement can be
made, the fabricator needs to answer the following questions:
18-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weld Repairs
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Dtailed assessment to find out the extremity of the defect, may use a
surface or sub-surface NDT method.
Cleaning the repair area (removal of paint grease, etc).
Once established the excavation site must be clearly identified and
marked out.
An excavation procedure may be required (method used ie grinding,
arc/air gouging, preheat requirements etc).
NDT to locate the defect and confirm its removal.
A welding repair procedure/method statement with the appropriate
(suitable for the alloys being repaired and may not apply in specific
situations.) welding process, consumable, technique, controlled heat
input and interpass temperatures, etc will need to be approved.
Use of approved welders.
Dressing the weld and final visual.
NDT procedure/technique prepared and carried out to ensure that the
defect has been successfully removed and repaired.
Any post repair heat treatment requirements.
Final NDT procedure/technique prepared and carried out after heat
treatment requirements.
Applying protective treatments (painting, etc as required).
Production repairs
Repairs are usually identified during production inspection. Evaluation of the
reports is by the Welding Inspector or NDT operator. Discontinuities in the
welds are only classed as defects when they are outside the range
permitted by the applied code or standard.
Analysis
As this defect is surface-breaking and at the fusion face the problem could
be cracking or lack of sidewall fusion. The former cause may be to do with
the material or welding procedure, if it is done the latter can be apportioned
to the welders lack of skill.
18-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weld Repairs
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Assessment
In this particular case as the defect is open to the surface, magnetic particle
inspection (MPI) or dye penetrant inspection (DPI) may be used to gauge
the length of the defect and ultrasonic testing (UT) to gauge the depth.
Excavation
If a thermal method of excavation is to be used, ie arc/air gouging it may be
a requirement to qualify a procedure as the heat generated may affect the
metallurgical structure, resulting in the risk of cracking in the weld or parent
material.
Depth to width ratio shall not be less than 1 (depth) to 1 (width), ideally
depth 1 to width 1.5.
18-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weld Repairs
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
18-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weld Repairs
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Confirmation of excavation
NDT must confirm that the defect has been completely excavated from the
area.
18-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weld Repairs
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
In-service repairs
Most in-service repairs very complex as the component is likely to be in a
different welding position and condition than during production. It may have
been in contact with toxic or combustible fluids so a permit to work will be
needed prior to any work . The repair welding procedure may look very
different to the original production procedure due to be changes.
Other factors may be taken into consideration, such as the effect of heat on
surrounding areas of the component, ie electrical components, or materials
that may become damaged by the repair procedure. This may also include
difficulty in carrying out any required pre or post-welding heat treatments
and a possible restriction of access to the area to be repaired. For large
fabrications it is likely that the repair must also take place on site without a
shutdown of operations, which may bring other considerations.
Joining technologies often play a vital role in the repair and maintenance of
structures. Parts can be replaced, worn or corroded parts can be built up
and cracks repaired.
In many instances, the Standard or Code used to design the structure will
define the type of repair that can be carried out and give guidance on the
methods to be followed. Standards imply that when designing or
manufacturing a new product it is important to consider a maintenance
regime and repair procedures. Repairs may be required during manufacture
and this situation should also be considered.
Normally there is more than one way of making a repair. For example,
cracks in cast iron might be held together or repaired by pinning, bolting,
riveting, welding or brazing. The choice will depend on factors such as the
reason for failure, material composition and cleanliness, environment and
the size and shape of the component.
18-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weld Repairs
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
It is very important that repair and maintenance welding are not regarded
as activities which are simple or straightforward. A repair may seem
undemanding but getting it wrong can result catastrophic failure with
disastrous consequences.
The small cost of analysis could prevent a valuable component being ruined
by ill-prepared repairs or save money by reducing or avoiding the need for
preheat if the composition is leaner than expected. Once the composition is
known, a welding procedure can be devised.
18-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weld Repairs
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Is PWHT practicable?
Although desirable, PWHT may not be possible for the same reasons
preheating is not. For large structures local PWHT may be possible but care
should be taken to abide by the relevant codes because it is easy to
introduce new residual stresses by improperly executed PWHT.
Is PWHT necessary?
PWHT may be needed for several reasons and the reason must be known
before considering whether it can be avoided.
18-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Weld Repairs
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
For all repair welds it is vital to ensure that welders are properly motivated
and carefully supervised.
As-welded repairs
Repair without PWHT is, normal where the original weld was not heat
treated, but some alloy steels and many thick-sectioned components require
PWHT to maintain a reasonable level of toughness, corrosion resistance,
etc. However, PWHT of components in-service is not always easy or even
possible and local PWHT may give rise to more problems than it solves
except in simple structures.
18-9
www.twitraining.com
Section 19
As long as these stresses are above the yield point of the metal at the
prevailing temperature, they continue to produce permanent deformation,
but in so doing are relieved and fall to yield-stress level so cease to cause
further distortion. But, if at this point we could release the weld from the
plate by cutting along the joint line, it would shrink further because, even
when distortion has stopped, the weld contains an elastic strain equivalent
to the yield stress. Visualise the completed joint as weld metal being
stretched elastically between two plates.
a)
b) c)
The stresses left in the joint after welding are referred to as residual
stresses. From the above it can be seen there will be both longitudinal and
transverse stresses (in the case of a very thick plate, there is a through-
thickness component of residual stress as well).
19-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Tension
Compression
In longitudinal stresses, the weld itself and some of the plate which has
been heated are at or near yield-stress level. Moving out into the plate from
the HAZ, the stresses first fall to zero (the tensile stress region extends
beyond the weld and HAZ into the parent plate) and beyond this there is a
region of compressive stress. The width of the band where tensile residual
stresses are present depends upon the heat input during welding, the higher
the heat input the wider the band where these tensile residual stresses
occur.
19-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Tension Compression
All fusion welds which have not been subjected to postweld treatments, the
vast majority of welded joints, contain residual stresses. Procedures
developed to minimise distortion may alter the distribution of the residual
stresses but do not eliminate them or even reduce their peak level.
19-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
19-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
1 Material properties.
2 Amount of restraint.
3 Joint design.
4 Fit-up.
5 Welding sequence.
The magnitude of thermal stresses induced into the material can be seen by
the volume change in the weld area on solidification and subsequent cooling
to room temperature. For example, when welding C-Mn steel, the molten
weld metal volume will be reduced by approximately 3% on solidification
and the volume of the solidified weld metal/HAZ will be reduced by a further
7% as its temperature falls from the melting point of steel to room
temperature.
Longitudinal shrinkage.
Transverse shrinkage.
Angular distortion.
Bowing and dishing.
Buckling.
19-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
For example, in a single V butt weld, the first weld run produces longitudinal
and transverse shrinkage and rotation. The second run causes the plates to
rotate using the first weld deposit as a fulcrum so balanced welding in a
double-sided V butt joint can produce uniform contraction and prevent
angular distortion.
Longitudinal bowing in welded plates happens when the weld centre is not
coincident with the neutral axis of the section so that longitudinal shrinkage
in the welds bends the section into a curved shape. Clad plate tends to bow
in two directions due to longitudinal and transverse shrinkage of the
cladding, producing a dished shape.
19-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
19.4.2 Restraint
If a component is welded without any external restraint, it distorts to relieve
the welding stresses. Methods of restraint such as strongbacks in butt
welds, can prevent movement and reduce distortion. Restraint produces
higher levels of residual stress in the material, so there is a greater risk of
cracking in weld metal and HAZ especially in crack-sensitive materials.
19-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Pre-setting of parts.
Pre-bending of parts.
Use of restraint.
The technique chosen will be influenced by the size and complexity of the
component or assembly, the cost of any restraining equipment and the need
to limit residual stresses.
19.5.1 Pre-setting
The parts are pre-set and left free to move during welding, see Figure 19.2.
The parts are pre-set by a pre-determined amount so that distortion
occurring during welding is used to achieve overall alignment and
dimensional control.
19-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
19.5.2 Pre-bending
Pre-bending or pre-springing parts before welding pre-stresses the
assembly to counteract shrinkage during welding. As shown in Figure 19.3,
pre-bending using strongbacks and wedges can pre-set a seam before
welding to compensate for angular distortion. Releasing the wedges after
welding will allow the parts to move back into alignment.
The main photograph shows the diagonal bracings and centre jack used to
pre-bend the fixture, not the component. This counteracts the distortion
introduced through out-of-balance welding.
When welding assemblies, all the component parts should be held in the
correct position until completion of welding and a suitably balanced
fabrication sequence used to minimise distortion.
19-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Welding with restraint will generate additional residual stresses in the weld,
which may cause cracking. When welding susceptible materials, a suitable
welding sequence and the use of preheating will reduce this risk. Restraint
is relatively simple to apply using clamps, jigs and fixtures.
Flexible clamps
Can be effective not only in applying restraint but also in setting up and
maintaining the joint gap (can also be used to close a gap that is too wide),
Figure 19.4b.
a) b)
c) d)
19-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Fully welded (welded on both sides of the joint) strongbacks (Figure 19.4d)
will minimise both angular distortion and transverse shrinkage. As significant
stresses can be generated across the weld, which will increase any
tendency for cracking, care should be taken in their use.
Pre-set parts so that welding distortion will achieve overall alignment and
dimensional control with the minimum of residual stress.
Pre-bend joint edges to counteract distortion and achieve alignment and
dimensional control with minimum residual stress.
Apply restraint during welding using jigs and fixtures, flexible clamps,
strongbacks and tack welding but consider the cracking risk which can
be quite significant, especially for fully welded strongbacks.
Use an approved procedure for welding and removal of welds for
restraint techniques, which may need preheat to avoid inperfections
forming in the component surface.
Elimination of welding.
Weld placement.
Reducing the volume of weld metal.
Reducing the number of runs.
Use of balanced welding.
19-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
If possible the design should use intermittent welds rather than a continuous
run to reduce the amount of welding. For example, in attaching stiffening
plates, a substantial reduction in the amount of welding can often be
achieved whilst maintaining adequate strength.
Figure 19.6 Distortion may be reduced by placing the welds around the neutral
axis.
As most welds are deposited away from the neutral axis, distortion can be
minimised by designing the fabrication so the shrinkage forces of an
individual weld are balanced by placing another weld on the opposite side
of the neutral axis. Where possible welding should be carried out alternately
on opposite sides instead of completing one side first. In large structures if
distortion is occurring preferentially on one side, it may be possible to take
corrective action, for example, by increasing welding on the other side to
control the overall distortion.
19-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Figure 19.7 Reducing the amount of angular distortion and lateral shrinkage.
Joint preparation angle and root gap should be minimised providing the weld
can be made satisfactorily. To facilitate access it may be possible to specify
a larger root gap and smaller preparation angle. By reducing the difference
in the amount of weld metal at the root and face of the weld, the degree of
angular distortion will be correspondingly reduced. Butt joints made in a
single pass using deep penetration have little angular distortion, especially if
a closed butt joint can be welded (Figure 19.7). For example, thin section
material can be welded using plasma and laser welding processes and thick
section can be welded, in the vertical position, using electrogas and
electroslag processes. Although angular distortion can be eliminated, there
will still be longitudinal and transverse shrinkage.
19-13
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Completing the joint with a small number of large weld deposits results in
more longitudinal and transverse shrinkage than completed in a larger
number of small passes. In a multi-pass weld, previously deposited weld
metal provides restraint, so the angular distortion per pass decreases as the
weld is built up. Large deposits also increase the risk of elastic buckling
particularly in thin section plate.
If welding alternately on either side of the joint is not possible, or if one side
has to be completed first, an asymmetrical joint preparation may be used
with more weld metal being deposited on the second side. The greater
contraction resulting from depositing the weld metal on the second side will
help counteract the distortion on the first side.
19-14
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Adopting best practice principles can have cost benefits. For example, for a
design fillet leg length of 6mm, depositing an 8mm leg length will result in
the deposition of 57% additional weld metal. Besides the extra cost of
depositing weld metal and the increased risk of distortion, it is costly to
remove this extra weld metal later. Designing for distortion control may incur
additional fabrication costs. For example, the use of a double V joint
preparation is an excellent way to reduce weld volume and control distortion
but extra costs may be incurred in production through manipulation of the
workpiece for the welder to access the reverse side.
Tack welding.
Back-to-back assembly.
Stiffening.
Tack welding
Ideal for setting and maintaining the joint gap but can also be used to resist
transverse shrinkage. To be effective, thought should be given to the
number of tack welds, their length and the distance between them. Too few,
risks the joint progressively closing up as welding proceeds. In a long seam,
using MMA or MIG/MAG, the joint edges may even overlap. When using the
submerged arc process the joint might open up if not adequately tacked.
19-15
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Figure 19.9 Alternative procedures used for tack welding to prevent transverse
shrinkage.
Directional tacking is useful for controlling the joint gap, for example closing
a joint gap which is or has become too wide.
When tack welding it is important that tacks to be fused into the main weld
are produced to an approved procedure using appropriately qualified
welders. The procedure may require preheat and an approved consumable
as specified for the main weld. Removal of the tacks also needs careful
control to avoid causing defects in the component surface.
Back-to-back assembly
By tack welding or clamping two identical components back-to-back,
welding of both components can be balanced around the neutral axis of the
combined assembly (see Figure 19.10a). It is recommended that the
assembly is stress-relieved before separating the components or it may be
necessary to insert wedges between the components (Figure 19.10b) so
when the wedges are removed the parts will move back to the correct shape
or alignment.
19-16
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Stiffening
Figure 19.11 Longitudinal stiffeners prevent bowing in butt welded thin plate joints.
Welding process
General rules for selecting a welding process to prevent angular distortion:
19-17
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Welding technique
General rules for preventing distortion are:
Figure 19.12 Angular distortion of the joint as determined by the number of runs in
the fillet weld.
Without restraint angular distortion in both fillet and butt joints is due to joint
geometry, weld size and the number of runs for a given cross-section.
Angular distortion, measured in degrees as a function of the number of runs
for a 10mm leg length fillet weld is shown.
If possible, balanced welding around the neutral axis should be done, for
example on double-sided fillet joints, by two people welding simultaneously.
In butt joints, the run order may be crucial in that balanced welding can be
used to correct angular distortion as it develops.
19-18
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Welding sequence
The welding sequence or direction of welding is important and should be
towards the free end of the joint. For long welds, the whole of the weld is not
completed in one direction. Short runs, for example using the back-step or
skip welding technique, are very effective in distortion control (Figure 19.13).
19-19
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
19-20
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Use packing pieces which will over-correct the distortion so that the
spring-back will return the component to the correct shape.
Check that the component is adequately supported during pressing to
prevent buckling.
Use a former (or rolling) to achieve a straight component or produce a
curvature.
As unsecured packing pieces may fly out from the press, the following
safe practices must be adopted:
- Bolt the packing pieces to the platen.
- Place a metal plate of adequate thickness to intercept the missile.
- Clear personnel from the hazard area.
19-21
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Spot heating
Spot heating is used to remove buckling, for example when a relatively thin
sheet has been welded to a stiff frame. Distortion is corrected by spot
heating on the convex side. If the buckling is regular, the spots can be
arranged symmetrically, starting at the centre of the buckle and working
outwards.
Line heating
Wedge-shaped heating
To correct distortion in larger complex fabrications it may be necessary to
heat whole areas in addition to using line heating. The pattern aims at
shrinking one part of the fabrication to pull the material back into shape.
Apart from spot heating of thin panels, a wedge-shaped heating zone should
be used; Figure 19.18 from base to apex and the temperature profile should
be uniform through the plate thickness. For thicker section material it may
be necessary to use two torches, one on each side of the plate.
19-22
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
a. b.
c.
19-23
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Residual Stresses and Distortions
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
General precautions
The dangers of using thermal straightening techniques are over-shrinking
too large an area or causing metallurgical changes by heating to too high a
temperature. When correcting distortion in steels the temperature of the
area should be restricted to approximately 60O-650C, dull red heat. If the
heating is interrupted or the heat lost, the operator must allow the metal to
cool then begin again.
19-24
www.twitraining.com
Section 20
Heat Treatment
Rev 1 November 2010
Heat Treatment
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
20 Heat Treatment
20.1 Introduction
The heat treatment given to a particular grade of steel by the steelmaker/
supplier should be shown on the material test certificate and may be
referred to as the supply condition.
Applied to
Relatively thin, lower strength C-steel.
Applied to
Relatively thin, high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels and some steels with
good toughness at low temperatures, eg cryogenic steels.
Normalised
After working (rolling or forging) the steel to size, it is heated to ~900C then
allowed to cool in air to ambient temperature; this optimises strength and
toughness and gives uniform properties from item to item for a particular
grade of steel (Figure 20.1).
Applied to
C-Mn steels and some low alloy steels.
20-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Heat Treatment
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Normalising:
Rapid heating to soak temperature (100% austenite)
Short soak time at temperature
Temperature, C Cool in air to ambient temperature
~ 900C
Time
Figure 20.1 Typical normalising heat treatment applied to C-Mn and some low
alloy steels.
Applied to
Some low alloy steels to give higher strength, toughness or wear resistance.
~ 900C
Quenching Tempering
cycle cycle
Time
Figure 20.2 A typical quenching and tempering heat treatment applied to some low
alloy steels.
20-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Heat Treatment
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Solution annealed
Hot or cold working to size, steel heated to ~1100C after.
Austenite
()
~ 900C
Temperature, C.
Austenite + ferrite
(
As-rolled or Control-rolled
Ferrite + pearlite hot rolled Or TMCP
() iron carbide
Time
Figure 20.3 Comparison of the control-rolled (TMCP) and as-rolled (hot rolling)
conditions.
Quenching
Time
Figure 20.4 Typical solution heat treatment (solution annealing) applied to
austenitic stainless steels.
20-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Heat Treatment
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Applied to
Austenitic stainless steels such as 304 and 316 grades.
Annealed
After working the steel (pressing or forging, etc) to size, it is heated to
~900C then allowed to cool in the furnace to ambient temperature; this
reduces strength and toughness but improves ductility (Figure 20.5).
Annealing:
Rapid heating to soak temperature (100% austenite).
Short soak time at temperature.
Slow cool in furnace to ambient temperature.
Temperature, C
~ 900C
Time
Figure 20.5 Typical annealing heat treatment applied to C-Mn and some low alloy
steels.
Applied to
C-Mn steels and some low alloy steels.
Figures 20.1-20.5 show thermal cycles for the main supply conditions and
subsequent heat treatment that can be applied to steels.
The temperature at which PWHT is carried out is usually well below the
temperature where phase changes can occur (see Note), but high enough
to allow residual stresses to be relieved quickly and to soften (temper) any
hard regions in the HAZ.
20-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Heat Treatment
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
There are major benefits of reducing residual stress and ensuring that the
HAZ hardness is not too high for steels for particular service applications:
Because the main reason for (and benefit of) PWHT is to reduce residual
stresses, PWHT is often called stress-relief.
Maximum heating rates specified for C-Mn steel depend on the thickness of
the item but tend to be in the range ~60 to ~200C/h.
20-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Heat Treatment
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
20-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Heat Treatment
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
~ 600C
Controlled heating
and cooling rates
~300C
Soak
time Air cool
Time
Figure 20.6 Typical PWHT applied to C-Mn steels.
It is also important to ensure that the fuel (particularly for oil-fired furnaces)
does not contain high levels of potentially harmful impurities, such as
sulphur.
Width of the heated band (must be within the soak temperature range).
Width of the temperature decay band (soak temperature to ~300C).
20-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Heat Treatment
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Figure 20.7 shows typical control zones for localised PWHT of a pipe butt
weld.
Weld seam
temp. temp.
decay heated band decay
band band
20-8
www.twitraining.com
Section 21
There are four aspects of arc welding safety that the visual/welding
inspector must consider:
Electric shock.
Heat and light.
Fumes and gases.
Noise.
The electric shock hazard associated with arc welding may be divided into
two categories:
21-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Arc Welding Safety
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Welding lead from one terminal of the power source to the electrode
holder or welding torch.
Welding return lead to complete the circuit, from the work to the other
terminal of the power source.
Earth lead from the work to an earth point. The power source should also
be earthed.
All three leads should be capable of carrying the highest welding current
required.
Duty cycle
All current carrying conductors heat up when welding current is passed
through them. Duty cycle is a measure of the capability of the welding
equipment in terms of the ratio of welding time to total time, which can be
expressed as:
W
e
l
d
i
n a
g t
t
i m
m e
e
D
u
t
y
c
y
c
l
e
x
1
0
0
T
o
t
l
i
21-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Arc Welding Safety
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
By observing this ratio the current carrying conductors will not be heated
above their rated temperature. Duty cycles are based on a total time of 10
minutes. For example: a power source has a rated output of 350A at 60%
duty cycle. This particular power source will deliver 350A (its rated output)
for six minutes out of every ten minutes without overheating.
Failure to carefully observe the duty cycle of equipment can over-stress the
part and with welding equipment cause overheating leading to instability and
the potential for electric shock.
The welding arc creates sparks, with the potential to cause flammable
materials near the welding area to ignite and cause fires. The welding area
should be clear of all combustible materials and the inspector should know
where the nearest fire extinguishers are and the correct type to use if a fire
does break out.
21.3.2 Light
Light radiation is emitted by the welding arc in three principal ranges:
Wavelength,
Type
nanometres
Infrared (heat) >700
Visible light 400-700
Ultraviolet radiation <400
21-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Arc Welding Safety
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Arc eye develops some hours after exposure, which may not even have
been noticed. The sand in the eye symptom and pain usually lasts for 12-24
hours, but can be longer in more severe cases. Fortunately, it is almost
always a temporary condition. In the unlikely event of prolonged and
frequently repeated exposures, permanent damage can occur.
Visible light
Intense visible light particularly approaching UV or blue light wavelengths
passes through the cornea and lens and can dazzle and, in extreme cases,
damage the network of optically sensitive nerves on the retina. Wavelengths
of visible light approaching infrared have slightly different effects but can
produce similar symptoms. Effects depend on the duration and intensity of
exposure and to some extent the individual's natural reflex action to close
the eye and exclude the incident light. Normally this dazzling does not
produce a long-term effect.
Infrared radiation
Infrared radiation is of longer wavelength than the visible light frequencies
and is perceptible as heat. The main hazard to the eyes is that prolonged
exposure (over years) causes a gradual but irreversible opacity of the lens.
Fortunately, the infrared radiation emitted by normal welding arcs causes
damage only within a comparatively short distance from the arc. There is an
immediate burning sensation in the skin surrounding the eyes should they
be exposed to arc heat and the natural reaction is to move or cover up to
prevent the skin heating, which also reduces eye exposure.
21-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Arc Welding Safety
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The fume plume contains solid particles from the consumables, base metal
and base metal coating. Depending on the length of exposure to these
fumes, most acute effects are temporary and include symptoms of burning
eyes and skin, dizziness, nausea and fever. Zinc fumes can cause metal
fume fever, a temporary illness similar to flu. Chronic, long-term exposure to
welding fumes can lead to siderosis (iron deposits in the lungs) and may
affect pulmonary function. Cadmium, ia a toxic metal found on steel as a
coating or in silver solder. Cadmium fumes can be fatal even under brief
exposure, with symptoms much like those of metal fume fever. These two
should not be confused. Twenty minutes of welding in the presence of
cadmium can be enough to cause fatalities, with symptoms appearing within
an hour and death five days later.
21.4.2 Gases
The gases resulting from arc welding present a potential hazard. Most of the
shielding gases (argon, helium and carbon dioxide) are non-toxic, when
released, but displace oxygen in the breathing air, causing dizziness,
unconsciousness and death the longer the brain is denied oxygen.
To reduce the risk of hazardous fumes and gases, keep the head out of the
fume plume. As obvious as this sounds, it is a common cause of fume and
gas over-exposure because the concentration of fumes and gases is
greatest in the plume. In addition, use mechanical ventilation or local
exhaust at the arc to direct the fume plume away from the face. If this is not
sufficient, use fixed or moveable exhaust hoods to draw the fume from the
general area. Finally, it may be necessary to wear an approved respiratory
device if sufficient ventilation cannot be provided. As a rule of thumb, if the
air is visibly clear and the welder is comfortable, the ventilation is probably
adequate.
21-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Arc Welding Safety
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
To identify hazardous substances, first read the material safety data sheet
for the consumable to see what fumes can be reasonably expected from
use of the product. Refer to the Occupational Exposure Limit (OEL) as
defined in the COSHH regulations which gives maximum concentrations to
which a healthy adult can be exposed to any one substance. Second, know
the base metal and determine if a paint or coating would cause toxic fumes
or gases. Particular attention should also be made to the dangers of
asphyxiation when welding in confined spaces. Risk assessment, permits to
work and gas testing are some of the necessary actions required to ensure
the safety of all personnel.
Noise
Exposure to loud noise can permanently damage hearing, cause stress and
increase blood pressure. Working in a noisy environment for long periods
can contribute to tiredness, nervousness and irritability. If the noise
exposure is greater than 85 decibels averaged over an 8 hour period then
hearing protection must be worn and annual hearing tests carried out.
Normal welding operations are not associated with noise level problems with
two exceptions: Plasma arc welding and air carbon arc cutting. If either of
these is to be performed then hearing protectors must be worn. The noise
associated with welding is usually due to ancillary operations such as
chipping, grinding and hammering. Hearing protection must be worn when
carrying out or when working in the vicinity of these operations.
21.5 Summary
The best way to manage the risks associated with welding is by
implementing risk management programmes. Risk management requires
the identification of hazards, assessment of the risks and implementation of
suitable controls to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.
21-6
www.twitraining.com
Section 22
Calibration
Rev 1 November 2010
Calibration
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
22 Calibration
22.1 Introduction
BS 7570 - Code of practice for validation of arc welding equipment, is a
standard that gives guidance to:
22.2 Terminology
BS 7570 defines the terms it uses, such as:
When considering welding equipment, those with output meters for welding
parameters (current, voltage, travel speed, etc) can be calibrated by
checking the meter reading with a more accurate measuring device and
adjusting the readings appropriately.
Equipment that does not have output meters (some power sources for
MMA, MIG/MAG) cannot be calibrated but can be validated checked to see
the controls are functioning properly.
22-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Calibration
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
For the main welding parameters, recommendations from the Standard are
as follows.
Current
Details are given about the instrumentation requirements and how to
measure pulsed current but there are requirements given, specified, or
recommendations made, about where in the circuit current measurements
should be made.
The implication is that current can be measured at any position in the circuit
the value should be the same.
Voltage
The standard emphasises that for processes where voltage is pre-set (on
constant voltage the power sources) the connection points used for the
22-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Calibration
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
voltage meter incorporated into the power source may differ from the arc
voltage, which is the important parameter.
This is illustrated by the figure which shows the power source voltage meter
connected across points 1 and 7.
Power
source
2 3
77 1 Wire feeder
4
Arc voltage
{
55
6
6
However, because there will be some voltage drops in sections 1-2, 3-4 and
6-7 due to connection points introducing extra resistance into the circuit, the
voltage meter reading on the power source will tend to give a higher reading
than the true arc voltage.
Even if the power source voltage meter is connected across points 3 and 7
(which it may be) the meter reading would not take account of any
significant voltage drops in the return cable, section 6-7.
22-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Calibration
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
The magnitude of any voltage drops in the welding circuit will depend on
cable diameter, length and temperature and the Standard emphasises the
following:
It is desirable to measure the true arc voltage between points 4-5 but for
some welding processes it is not practical to measure arc voltage so
close to the arc.
For MMA, it is possible to take a voltage reading relatively close to the
arc by connecting one terminal of the voltmeter through the cable sheath
as close as ~2m from the arc and connect the other terminal to the
workpiece (or to earth).
For MIG/MAG the nearest practical connection points have to be 3-5 but
a change from an air to a water-cooled torch or vice versa may have a
significant effect on the measured voltage.
Voltage drops between points 5-6 will be insignificant if there is a good
connection of the return cable at point 6.
The Standard gives guidance about minimising any drop in line voltage by
ensuring that the:
The Standard gives data for line voltage drops (DC voltage) according to
current, cable cross-section and length (for both copper and aluminium
cables).
Travel speed
Welding manipulators, such as rotators and robotic manipulators, as well as
the more conventional linear travel carriages, influence heat input and other
properties of a weld and should be checked at intervals. Most of the
standard devices can be checked using a stopwatch and measuring rule,
but more sophisticated equipment, such as a tacho-generator, may be
appropriate.
22-4
www.twitraining.com
Section 23
Preheat is used when welding steels for a number of reasons and it helps to
understand why it is often specified one of the main reasons is to assist in
removing hydrogen from the weld. Preheat temperatures for steel structures
and pipework are calculated by taking into account the carbon equivalent
(CEV) and thickness of the material and the arc energy or heat input
(kJ/mm) of the welding process.
23.2 Definitions
Preheat temperature
Temperature of the work piece in the weld zone immediately before any
welding operation (including tack welding).
Normally expressed as a minimum, but can also be specified as a range.
Interpass temperature
Temperature of the weld during welding and between passes in a multi-
run weld and adjacent parent metal immediately prior to the application
of the next run.
Normally expressed as a maximum but should not drop below the
minimum preheat temperature.
23-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Application and Control of Preheat
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Local Global
Flame applied
preheat
23-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Application and Control of Preheat
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Gas/electric ovens
Generally used for PWHT but can be used for large sections of material to
give a controlled and uniform preheat.
With flame applied preheating sufficient time must be allowed for the
temperature to equalise throughout the thickness of the components to be
welded, otherwise only the surface temperature will be measured. The time
lapse depends on the specification requirements.
Where?
23-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Application and Control of Preheat
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Why?
Applying preheat has the following advantages:
Slows down the cooling rate of the weld and HAZ, reducing the risk of
hardened microstructures forming; allowing absorbed hydrogen more
opportunity of diffusing out, thus reducing the potential for cracking.
Removes moisture from the region of the weld preparation.
Improves overall fusion characteristics during welding.
Ensures more uniform expansion and contraction, lowering stresses
between weld and parent material.
23-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Application and Control of Preheat
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
23-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Application and Control of Preheat
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
23-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Application and Control of Preheat
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
23.4.3 Thermocouple
Based on measuring the thermoelectric potential difference between a
hot junction (placed on the weld) and a cold junction (reference junction).
Measures wide range of temperatures.
Accurate, gives the actual temperature.
Can be used for continuous monitoring.
Need calibration.
Examples of thermocouples.
23-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Application and Control of Preheat
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
23.5 Summary
The visual/welding inspector should refer to the WPS for both preheat and
interpass temperature requirements. If in any doubt as to where the
temperature measurements should be taken, the senior welding inspector or
welding engineer should be consulted for guidance.
Both preheat and interpass temperatures are applied to slow down the
cooling rate during welding, avoiding the formation of brittle microstructures
(ie martensite) and thus preventing cold cracking.
23-8
www.twitraining.com
Section 24
1 Good eyesight.
2 Specialist gauges.
3 Hand tools, ie magnifying glass, torch, mirror, graduated scale, etc.
4 Pencil/pen, report forms, acceptance criteria and a watch.
Good eyesight
To effectively carry out your work as a CSWIP qualified Welding Inspector it
is important you have a current eyesight certificate for close vision and a
colour blindness test. This must be provided before your CSWIP Welding
Inspection examination as per the CSWIP-WI-6-92 document.
24-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Practical Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Specialist gauges
Available to measure the various elements that need to be measured in a
welded fabrication including:
1
2
3
4
5
6
24-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Practical Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
24-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Practical Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Angle of preparation
Scale reads 0-60o in 5o steps.
The angle is read against the
chamfered edge of the plate or
pipe.
Linear misalignment
Can be used to measure
misalignment of members by
placing the edge of the gauge on
the lower member and rotating
the segment until the pointed
finger contacts the higher
member.
Pitting/mechanical damage,
etc
The gauge can measure defects
by placing the edge of the gauge
on the plate and rotating the
segment until the pointed finger
contacts the lowest depth.
24-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Practical Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Excess weld metal can be easily calculated by measuring the leg length,
and multiplying it by 0.7. This value is then subtracted from the measured
throat thickness = excess weld metal.
24-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Practical Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Acceptance
Defect type
Acceptance levels plate and pipe levels macro
Table No.
only
Remarks Maximum allowance Remarks
Lack of root Inadequate penetration on one Lack of root fusion, not to exceed 30mm total
12 Not permitted.
fusion root face. continuous or accumulative.
Excessive penetration, collapse
13 Burn-through Not permitted. Not permitted.
of the weld root.
Angular Distortion due to weld
14 3mm max. Plate only. Accept.
distortion contraction.
Root
Irregularities in the root profile
shrinkage or 35mm maximum length.
15 due to shrinkage and contraction Accept.
root 2mm maximum depth.
of the weld metal.
concavity
Training acceptance levels for plate, pipe and macro
D = depth L = length H = height t = thickness
24-6
www.twitraining.com
Appendix 1
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Appendix 1
Multiple Choice Questions Paper 1
1 Which mechanical test can be used to measure the toughness of weld metal,
HAX and parent material?
a Macro.
b Nick break.
c Hardness.
d Charpy impact.
2 Which is the best destructive test for showing lack of sidewall fusion in a 25mm
thickness butt weld?
a Nick break.
b Side bend.
c Charpy impact.
d Face bend test.
4 A fabrication procedure calls for the toes of all welds to be blended in by grinding.
The reason for doing this is to:
5 For full penetration single-sided butt joints, root bead penetration and profile are
mainly influenced by:
a Root face.
b Bevel angle.
c Root gap.
d Included angle.
A1-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
6 Which of the following would be cause for rejection by most fabrication standards
when inspecting fillet welds with undercut, a small amount of:
a Depth.
b Length.
c Width.
d Sharpness.
7 When visually inspecting the root bead of a single V-butt weld it should be
checked for:
a Leg length.
b Weld profile.
c Weld width.
d Throat thickness.
9 The European Standard for NDE of fusion welds by visual examination is:
a EN 288.
b EN 499.
c EN 287.
d EN 970.
10 Visual inspection of a fabricated item for a high integrity application should cover
inspection activities:
A1-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
a Linear misalignment.
b Root gap being too large.
c Root faces being too small.
d Welding current too high.
13 When visually inspecting the face of a finished weld which of the following flaws
would be considered to be the most serious:
15 A Code of Practice is a:
a Entrapped slag.
b Entrapped gas.
c Lack of inter-run fusion.
d None of the above.
a Throat thickness.
b Leg lengths.
c Penetration depths.
d Both a and c.
A1-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
19 In a bend test, when the face of the specimen is in tension and root is in
compression, the test is called a
:
a Root bend.
b Side bend.
c Face bend.
d Longitudinal bend.
20 Heavy porosity on the surface of some MMA welds made on a construction site is
most likely to be caused by:
a Excessive amps.
b Excessive OCV.
c Excessive travel speed.
d Current too low.
24 Which of the following fillet welds is the strongest assuming they are all made
using the same material and welded using the same WPS?
A1-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
25 A typical included angle for MMA welding a full penetration pipe butt joint is:
a 35
b 70
c 90
d Dependent on the pipe diameter.
26 A fillet weld has an actual throat thickness of 8mm and a leg length of 7mm, what
is the excess weld metal?
a 2.1mm
b 1.8mm
c 3.1mm
d 1.4mm
29 BS EN 970 allows the use of a magnifying glass for visual inspection but
recommends that the magnification is:
a x2.
b x2 to x5.
c x5 to x10.
d Not greater than x20.
30 The majority of welder qualification tests are carried out using unbacked joints,
because:
A1-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
1 Deflection of the arc by magnetic forces that can make welding difficult to control
is commonly known as:
a Arc initiation.
b Arc misalignment.
c Arc blow.
d Arc constriction.
a E 38 3 R.
b E 6013.
c E 7018 - G.
d E 51 33 B.
3 Which of type of electrode is used for stovepipe welding for overland pipelines
construction?
a Rutile.
b Cellulosic.
c High recovery rutile.
d Acid-rutile.
4 The three main types of MMA electrodes used for welding C and C-Mn steels
are:
5 A WPS may specify a maximum width for individual weld beads (the weave
width) when welding C-Mn steels. If the width is exceeded it may cause:
6 You notice that MMA electrodes with the flux covering removed are being used
as filler rods for TIG welding. This should not be allowed because:
a It is wasteful.
b The rod diameter may be too large.
c The weld metal composition may be wrong.
d The rod is too short.
A1-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
a Tungsten spatter.
b Risk of crater cracking.
c Risk of arc strikes.
d Interpass temperature.
8 Which type of power source characteristic is normally used for manual welding?
a Constant voltage.
b Flat characteristic.
c Constant current.
d A motor generator.
a Arc voltage.
b Welding speed.
c Ferro-silicon in the electrode coating.
d Current.
10 Pipe bores of some materials must be purged with argon before and during TIG
welding in order to:
11 The chemical composition of the weld metal deposited by a C-Mn steel MMA
electrode is usually controlled by:
12 Silicon is added to steel and the covering of MMA electrodes in order to:
a Provide deoxidation.
b Improve strength.
c Improve toughness.
d Provide more resistance to hydrogen cracking.
A1-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
a Reduce porosity.
b Give controlled root penetration.
c Avoid the need for a back purge.
d By acting as a backing for the root run.
e
14 According to AWS 2.4 a weld symbol for the other side is placed:
15 The term low hydrogen electrode is often used for certain electrodes. What type
of covering will they have?
a Cellulosic.
b Rutile.
c Acid.
d Basic.
A1-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
a Joules.
b N/mm2.
c J/mm2.
d kJ/mm.
a Nickel.
b Manganese.
c Molybdenum.
d Aluminium.
20 Nick break and fillet fracture tests are used for assessing:
a Weld quality.
b Weld metal ductility.
c Weld metal toughness.
d Resistance to fracture.
a 18%Cr, 8% Ni.
b 2.25Cr 1Mo.
c 9%Cr,1Mo.
d 9%Ni.
22 Weld spatter during MMA welding is most likely to be caused by:
a Excessive current.
b Incorrect baking and storage of electrodes.
c Bad batch of electrodes.
d Too low an OCV.
A1-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
a WPS number.
b Welding process. 14
c Filler material.
d Acceptance standard.
28 The current/polarity used for TIG welding of all materials except aluminium and
magnesium is:
a DC negative.
b DC positive.
c AC.
d Square wave AC.
a 150-200C.
b 200-250C.
c 300-350C.
d 400-450C.
30 If welding travel speed is doubled but the current and voltage remain the same
the heat input will be:
a Reduced by 50%.
b Increased by a factor of two.
c About the same.
d Reduced by approximately 25%.
A1-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
a Neutral.
b Agglomerated.
c Fused.
d Are all about the same.
2 A large grain size in the HAZ of a C-Mn steel weld joint may have:
a Low ductility.
b Low toughness.
c High toughness.
d High tensile strength.
a C-Mn steels.
b Austenitic stainless steel.
c Low alloy steels for elevated temperature service.
d Low carbon steels for cryogenical service.
5 The property of a material which has the greatest influence on welding distortion
is its:
a Yield strength.
b Coefficient of thermal expansion.
c Elastic modulus.
d Coefficient of thermal conductivity.
6 Which of the following is a suitable shielding gas for FCAW of stainless steels?
a 100% argon.
b 70% argon + 30%He.
c Argon + 5% hydrogen.
d Argon + 20% CO2.
A1-13
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
a Solidification cracking.
b Hydrogen cracking.
c Lamellar tearing.
d Weld decay.
a 100%CO2.
b 100% Argon.
c 80% argon + 20% CO2.
d 98% argon + 2% O2.
11 Which of the following is associated with SAW more often than it is with MMA
welds?
12 EN ISO 5817 (Level C) specifies that the limit for the diameter (D) of a single
pore in a weld is:
A1-14
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
14 Lamellar tearing has occurred in a steel fabrication. What technique could have
been used to find it before the weld was made?
a X-ray examination.
b Liquid penetrant examination.
c Ultrasonic examination.
d It could not have been found by any inspection method.
15 Preheating a low alloy steel prior to welding to minimise, the risk of:
a Porosity.
b Excessive distortion.
c HAZ cracking.
d Lack of fusion.
a 600-650C.
b 1000-1100C.
c 700-800C.
d 880-920C.
17 For GMAW the burn-off rate of the wire is directly related to:
a Stick-out length.
b Wire feed speed.
c Arc voltage.
d Travel speed.
18 For MMA welding of a 60mm wall nozzle to a 100mm wall vessel shell, preheat
temperature should be checked:
A1-15
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
19 A crack running along the centreline of a weld bead could be caused by:
21 The use of low carbon austenitic stainless steels and stabiliser stainless steels
will minimise the risk of:
a HAZ cracking.
b Weld decay.
c Weld metal cracking.
d Distortion.
22 Which type of SAW flux is susceptible to breaking down into fine particles during
circulation?
a Fused.
b Neutral.
c Alloyed.
d Agglomerated.
24 BS EN ISO 5817 (Level B) specifies the limit for excess weld metal (h) on a butt
weld as:
A1-16
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
25 A C-Mn steel is being welded by MMA and the electrode run-out lengths that
have been used are much shorter than specified by the WPS. This deviation may
give:
26 The first procedure prepared for a Weld Procedure Qualification test weld is a:
a pWPS.
b WPS.
c WPQR.
d WPAR.
a Is too slow.
b Can be a safety hazard.
c May damage the material.
d Causes problems with coating operations.
a 550J/mm.
b 55J/mm.
c 5.5J/mm.
d 5kJ/mm.
30 Initiation of a TIG arc using a high frequency spark may not be allowed because
it:
A1-17
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
10s
a
10
s
s10
b
10
c
s10
d
a Time.
b Type of isotope.
c Source-to-film distance.
d Source strength.
4 Which element has the greatest effect on the HAZ hardness of C-Mn steel?
a Molybdenum.
b Chromium.
c Titanium.
d Carbon.
5 Preheating a steel plate with a carbon equivalent value (CEV) of 0.48 may be
required to:
A1-19
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
7 In friction welding, the metal at the interface when the joining occurs is described
as being in the:
a Liquid state.
b Intercritical state.
c Plastic state.
d Elastic state.
9 Which of the following cutting methods is suitable for cutting stainless steel?
a Plasma.
b Oxy-acetylene.
c Oxy-propane.
d It depends upon the thickness.
10 Which of the following would be classed as the most serious type of defect?
11 Ultrasonic testing has an advantage over other NDT methods for the detection of:
A1-20
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
12 Exceeding the maximum interpass temperature specified for a C-Mn steel weld
joint may give:
a Excessive porosity.
b Burn through.
c Lower toughness.
d Higher strength.
14 The temperature range over which a steel goes from having high to low
toughness is called the:
15 For SAW, what is the effect of raising arc voltage but keeping all other
parameters the same?
16 Changing an essential variable beyond the allowed limits for a qualified wielding
procedure:
17 With reference to the various grades of stainless steels which of the following
statements is true?
A1-21
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
a E 6010.
b E 7016.
c E 7018.
d E 6013.
19 Welds made with very high heat input will show a reduction in:
a Tensile ductility.
b Notch toughness.
c Fatigue strength.
d Creep resistance.
a Using inductance.
b Using 100%CO2.
c Using Ar + 30%He.
d Increasing the stick-out length.
22 Repair welding of in-service plant and equipment may be more difficult than
making repairs during initial fabrication because:
a Thulium 170.
b Ytterbium 169.
c Iridium 192.
d Cobalt 60.
A1-22
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
a By using a densitometer.
b By using an image quality indicator (IQI).
c From the kVA used.
d From the source/tube to work standoff distance used.
25 A transverse tensile test from a Weld Procedure Approval Record (WPAR) test
plate is used to measure:
26 The highest and lowest heat input positions are considered to be:
a PB highest; PA lowest.
b PE highest; PC lowest.
c PD highest; PB lowest.
d PF highest; PG lowest.
27 What type of covering will an electrode have that is suitable for welding 60mm C-
Mn steel and can give good weld metal toughness at -50C?
a Rutile.
b Basic.
c Cellulosic.
d Choice will depend on the welding position.
28 The dip transfer or short-circuiting mode of metal transfer used for MIG/MAG
welding is characterised by:
29 Carbon equivalent values (CEV) are used to determine how to avoid the risk of:
a Hydrogen cracking.
b Lamellar tearing.
c Solidification cracking.
d Weld decay.
A1-23
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 1
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
30 When two different material types are welded together the joint is referred to as:
a A composite joint.
b A transition joint.
c An autogenous weld.
d Heterogeneous joint.
A1-24
www.twitraining.com
Appendix 2
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Appendix 2
CSWIP 3.0 & 3.1 Training Questions for Plate Butt Weld 1
Weld Face
1 Maximum excess weld metal height (The highest individual point measured):
Which answer best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject
your findings to the given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 30-60mm.
c 0-30mm.
d 100-120mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 20-50mm.
c None observed.
d 8-12mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
4 Undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a Smooth intermittent.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
5 Porosity in the weld: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance
levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A2-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
9 Mechanical damage (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which answer
best matches your assessment of the total number and would you accept or
reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
a 4 areas.
b 1-2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
Weld Root
a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 3-5mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity or root shrinkage: Which answer best matches your assessment
to the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
A2-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
16 Cracks in the root: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material (excluding hard
stamping): Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would your accept or reject you findings to the given acceptance levels?
18 Porosity in the weld root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
19 Burn-through in the root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
20 Angular distortion: Which answer best matches your assessment and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels (measure from the
weld centreline to the plate edge).
a 3-5mm.
b 6-8mm.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A2-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A2-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
PLATE NUMBER:
WELD FACE
a b c d e f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WELD ROOT
a b c d e f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A2-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A2-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
CSWIP 3.0 and 3.1 Training Questions for Plate Butt Weld 2
Weld Face
1 Maximum excess weld metal height (highest individual point measured): Which
answer best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 30-80mm.
c 0-35mm.
d 100-120mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 20-30mm.
c None observed.
d 5-18mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 Undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 60mm in length.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5 Porosity in the weld: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance
levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
9 Mechanical damage (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which answer
best matches your assessment of the total number and would you accept or
reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
a 4 areas.
b 1 area.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
Weld Root
a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 3-5mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A2-13
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity or root shrinkage: Which answer best matches your assessment
of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels.
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
16 Cracks in the root: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A2-14
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material (excluding hard
stamping): Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
18 Porosity in the weld root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
19 Burn-through in the root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
20 Angular distortion: Which answer best matches your assessment and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels. (Measure from the
weld centreline to the plate edge.)
a 3-5mm.
b 6-8mm.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-15
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A2-16
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A2-17
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
PLATE NUMBER:
WELD FACE
a b c d e f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WELD ROOT
a b c d e f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A2-18
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
CSWIP 3.0 and 3.1 Training Questions for Plate Butt Weld 3
Weld Face
1 Maximum excess weld metal height (highest individual point measured): Which
answer best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 30-80mm.
c 0-30mm.
d 100-120mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 20-30mm.
c None observed.
d 5-18mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 Undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 60mm in length.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-19
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5 Porosity in the weld: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance
levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-20
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
9 Mechanical damage (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which answer
best matches your assessment of the total number and would you accept or
reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
Weld Root
a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 3-5mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A2-21
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity or shrinkage: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels.
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
16 Cracks in the root: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A2-22
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material (excluding hard
stamping): Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
18 Porosity in the weld root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
19 Burn-through in the root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
20 Angular distortion: Which answer best matches your assessment and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels, (measure from the
weld centreline to the plate edge).
a 3-5mm.
b 6-8mm.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-23
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A2-24
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A2-25
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
PLATE NUMBER:
WELD FACE
a b c d e f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WELD ROOT
a b c d e f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A2-26
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
CSWIP 3.0 and 3.1 Training Questions for Plate Butt Weld 4
Weld Face
1 Maximum excess weld metal height (highest individual point measured): Which
answer best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 30-60mm.
c 0-35mm.
d 100-120mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 20-30mm.
c None observed.
d 8-12mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 Undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 20-30mm in length.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-27
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5 Porosity in the weld: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance
levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-28
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
9 Mechanical damage (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which answer
best matches your assessment of the total number and would you accept or
reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
a 4 areas.
b 1-2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
Weld Root
a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 3-5mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A2-29
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity or root shrinkage: Which answer best matches your assessment
to the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels.
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
16 Cracks in the root: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A2-30
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material (excluding hard
stamping): Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
18 Porosity in the weld root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
19 Burn-through in the root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
20 Angular distortion: Which answer best matches your assessment and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels, (measure from the
weld centreline to the plate edge).
a 3-5mm.
b 6-8mm.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-31
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A2-32
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A2-33
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
PLATE NUMBER:
WELD FACE
a b c d e f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WELD ROOT
a b c d e f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A2-34
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
CSWIP 3.0 and 3.1 Training Questions for Plate Butt Weld 5
Weld Face
1 Excess weld metal height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 20-30mm.
c 0-15mm.
d 30-60mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 20-30mm.
c None observed.
d 5-12mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 Undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm in length.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-35
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5 Porosity in the weld: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance
levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-36
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
9 Mechanical damage (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which answer
best matches your assessment of the total number and would you accept or
reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
a 4 areas.
b 1-2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
Weld Root
a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 3-6mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A2-37
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity or shrinkage: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels.
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
16 Cracks in the root: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A2-38
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material (excluding hard
stamping): Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
18 Porosity in the weld root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
19 Burn-through in the root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
20 Angular distortion: Which answer best matches your assessment and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels, (measure from the
weld centreline to the plate edge).
a 3-5mm2.
b 6-8mm2.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A2-39
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A2-40
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
A2-41
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
PLATE NUMBER:
WELD FACE
a b c d e f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WELD ROOT
a b c d e f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A2-42
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 2
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Acceptance
Table number
A2-43
www.twitraining.com
Appendix 3
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Appendix 3
CSWIP 3.0 and 3.1 Training Questions for Pipe Butt Weld 1
Weld face
1 Maximum excess weld metal height. (highest individual point measured) Which
answer best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which of the answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 30-60mm.
c 0-30mm.
d 100-120mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 20-50mm.
c None observed.
d 8-12mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
4 Undercut: which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a Smooth intermittent.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
5 Porosity in the weld: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance
levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment to the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A3-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
9 Mechanical damage (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which answer
best matches your assessment of the total number and would you accept or
reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
a 4 areas.
b 1 area.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
Weld Root
a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 3-5mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity or shrinkage: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
A3-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
16 With reference to cracks in the root which of the following answers best matches
your assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
17 With reference to mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material
(Excluding Hard Stamping) which of the answers best matches your assessment
of the accumulative total and would your accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
18 With references to porosity in the weld root area which of the following answers
best matches your assessment of the accumulative total area and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
19 With reference to burn through in the root area which of the following answers
best matches your assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or
reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
20 With reference to cluster porosity which of the following answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels (measure from the weld centreline to the plate edge).
a 3-5mm2.
b 26-88mm2.
c None observed.
d 12-20mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
PIPE NUMBER:
WELD FACE
a b c d e f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WELD ROOT
a b c d e f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A3-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
CSWIP 3.0 and 3.1 Training Questions for Pipe Butt Weld 2
Answers to be indicated on the Candidate Answer Sheet under the heading of Pipe
Butt Weld the Weld Face.
2 Incomplete fill: Which of the answers best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 30-60mm.
c 0-30mm.
d 100-120mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of
the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 20-30mm.
c None observed.
d 8-12mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 Undercut: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
imperfection and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance
levels?
a 25mm in length.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5 Porosity in the weld: Which of the answers best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of
the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
8 Arc strikes: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
total number and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
9 Mechanical damage: (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which of the
following answers best matches your assessment of the total number and would
you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
a 4 areas.
b 1 area.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject
a 3-5mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 Lack of root penetration: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
A3-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
13 Lack of root fusion: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity or root shrinkage: Which of the answers best matches your
assessment to the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels.
15 Root undercut: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
16 Cracks in the root: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
A3-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material: (excluding hard
stamping) Which of the answers best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
18 Porosity in the weld root area: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
19 Burn through in the root area: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
20 With reference to porosity: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance
levels. (Measure from the weld centerline to the plate edge.)
a 35-45mm2.
b 60-80mm2.
c None observed.
d 12-22mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
PIPE NUMBER:
WELD FACE
a b c d e f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WELD ROOT
a b c d e f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A3-13
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
CSWIP 3.0 and 3.1 Training Questions for Pipe Butt Weld 3
Answers to be indicated on the Candidate Answer Sheet under the heading of Pipe
Butt Weld.
1 Maximum excess weld metal height: (highest individual point measured) Which of
the answers best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which of the answers best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 50-80mm.
c 0-30mm.
d 100-120mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment
of the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 20-30mm.
c None observed.
d 5-12mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-14
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
4 Undercut: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
imperfection and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance
levels?
a 50mm in length.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
5 Porosity in the weld: Which of the answers best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of
the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
A3-15
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
8 Arc strikes: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
total number and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
9 Mechanical damage: (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which of the
following answers best matches your assessment of the total number and would
you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
11 Root penetration height (The highest individual point measured) Which of the
answers best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 3-5mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-16
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
12 Lack of root penetration: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
13 Lack of root fusion: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity or root shrinkage: Which of the answers best matches your
assessment to the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels.
15 Root undercut: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A3-17
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
16 Cracks in the root: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material: (excluding hard
stamping): Which of the answers best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
18 Porosity in the weld root area: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
19 Burn through in the root area: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-18
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
20 Porosity: which of the following answers best matches your assessment and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels (measure
from the weld centerline to the plate edge).
a 30-50mm2.
b 60-80mm2.
c None observed.
d 10-20mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-19
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
PIPE NUMBER:
WELD FACE
a b c d e f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WELD ROOT
a b c d e f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A3-20
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
CSWIP 3.0 and 3.1 Training Questions for Pipe Butt Weld 4
Answers to be indicated on the Candidate Answer Sheet under the heading of Pipe
Butt Weld.
1 Maximum excess weld metal height: (highest individual point measured) Which of
the answers best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which of the answers best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 30-60mm.
c 0-35mm.
d 100-120mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment
of the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 20-50mm.
c None observed.
d 2-6mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-21
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
4 Undercut: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
imperfection and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance
levels?
a 20-30mm in length.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
5 Porosity in the weld: Which of the answers best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of
the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
A3-22
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
8 Arc strikes: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
total number and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 2 total.
b 3 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
9 Mechanical damage: (excluding hard stamping and pop marks), Which of the
following answers best matches your assessment of the total number and would
you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
a 4 areas.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject
a 3-5mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-23
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
12 Lack of root penetration: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
13 Lack of root fusion: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity or root shrinkage: Which of the answers best matches your
assessment to the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels.
15 Root undercut: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A3-24
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
16 Cracks in the root: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material: (excluding hard
stamping), Which of the answers best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
18 Porosity in the weld root area: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
19 Burn through in the root area: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-25
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
20 Cluster porosity: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
(measure from the weld centerline to the plate edge)
a 3-5mm2.
b 6-8mm2.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-26
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
PIPE NUMBER:
WELD FACE
a b c d e f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WELD ROOT
a b c d e f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A3-27
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
CSWIP 3.0 and 3.1 Training Questions for Pipe Butt Weld 5
Answers to be indicated on the Candidate Answer Sheet under the heading of Pipe
Butt Weld.
1 Excess weld metal height: (highest individual point measured): Which of the
answers best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which of the answers best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 30-60mm.
c 0-15mm.
d 100-120mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment
of the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 20-50mm.
c None observed.
d 5-12mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-28
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
4 Undercut: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
imperfection and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance
levels?
a Smooth intermittent.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
5 Porosity in the weld: Which of the answers best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of
the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
A3-29
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
8 Arc strikes: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the
total number and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
9 Mechanical damage: (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which of the
following answers best matches your assessment of the total number and would
you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
a 4 areas.
b 1-2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
a 3-5mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None .
d Greater than 6mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-30
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
12 Lack of root penetration: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
13 Lack of root fusion: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity or root shrinkage: Which of the answers best matches your
assessment to the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels.
15 Root undercut: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
A3-31
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
16 Cracks in the root: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material: (excluding hard
stamping), which of the answers best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
18 Porosity in the weld root area: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
19 Burn through in the root area: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-32
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
20 Cluster porosity: Which of the following answers best matches your assessment
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
(Measure from the weld centerline to the plate edge.)
a 30-50mm2.
b 60-80mm2.
c None observed.
d 10-20mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A3-33
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
PIPE NUMBER:
WELD FACE
a b c d e f
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WELD ROOT
a b c d e f
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A3-34
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Acceptance
Table number
A3-35
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
Weld face
A B C
Notes: Excess weld metal height = Misalignment = Weld width = Toe blend =
C D
A
Notes: Excess weld metal height = Misalignment = Toe blend = Weld width =
A3-37
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
A B C
C D A
A3-38
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
Weld face
A B C
Notes: Excess weld metal height = Misalignment = Weld width = Toe blend =
C D
A
Notes: Excess weld metal height = Misalignment = Toe blend = Weld width =
A3-39
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 3
Copyright TWI Ltd 2010
A B C
C D A
A3-40
www.twitraining.com
Appendix 4
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 4
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Across
7 For stovers (10)
9 The forces of magnetism on the weld pool (3,4)
10 An electrode with good toughness (5)
13 For creep resistance (10)
14 L in 316l (3)
18 Without filler wire (10)
24 I am often clustered (8)
26 CEV (6,10,5)
28 A solid inclusion (4)
30 Carelessness in welding causes me (3,6)
32 Used to examine grain structure (5)
33 I add strength and hardness (6)
34 A very hard and brittle microstructure (10)
36 Slope out to prevent me (6,5)
38 I can cut anything (6)
42 UTS (8,7,8)
44 A mode of transfer used in all positions (3)
45 Constant in GTAW (8)
46 Common gas used for GTAW (5)
47 Used for radiography over 50mm (6)
48 I may be essential or not (8)
49 When welding I must never go below this (7,7)
Down
1 IQI (5,7,9)
2 Used for weld detail (6)
3 I have a half life of 74.4.days (7)
4 Technique used to minimise distortion (4,4)
5 Can be caused by excess purge pressure (9)
6 Polarity for carbon GTAW (1,1,9,8)
8 10 x 10 x 55 long (6)
11 I suffer from this when depleted of chromium (4,5)
12 I am caused by unbalanced expansion and contraction (10)
15 This word is generally associated with rejection by most codes (9)
16 Only applicable in dip transfer (10)
17 Keeps rods at 70 degrees on site (6)
19 Used in mechanical testing over 12mm (4,4)
20 A step-like crack (8,7)
21 Preheating can minimise my chances (6)
22 SAW flux (5)
23 You can get me by 0.7 of your leg (6,6)
25 Used to apply a magnetic field (4)
27 A SAW flux easily crushed (12)
29 If my root is in compression this is me (4,4)
31 My purging powers prevent this (9)
35 Can be caused by an increased vertex angle (7,11)
37 All equipment should have this (11)
39 Polarity for welding aluminium with GTAW (11,7)
40 An electronic hazard (4,9)
41 If you slow down I go up (4,5)
43 Below this I turn molecular (5,7)
A4-1
www.twitraining.com
Appendix 5
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Appendix 5
Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Macro-examination
Macro-etching a specimen is etched and evaluated macrostructurally at low
magnifications, is frequently used for evaluating carbon and low alloy steel
products such as billets, bars, blooms and forgings as well as welds. There
are several procedures for rating a steel specimen by a graded series of
photographs showing the incidence of certain conditions and is applicable to
carbon and low alloy steels. A number of different etching reagents may be
used depending upon the type of examination. Steels react differently to
etching reagents because of variations in chemical composition, method of
manufacture, heat treatment and many other variables.
Micro-examination
Performed on samples either cut to size or mounted in a resin mould. The
samples are polished to a fine finish, normally one micron diamond paste
and usually etched in an appropriate chemical solution prior to examination
on a metallurgical microscope. Micro-examination is performed for a number
of purposes, assess the structure of the material and examine for
metallurgical and anomalies such as third phase precipitates, excessive
grain growth, etc. Many routine tests such as phase counting or grain size
determinations are performed in conjunction with micro-examinations.
Metallographic weld evaluations can take many forms. In its most simplest,
a weld deposit can be visually examined for large scale defects such as
porosity or lack of fusion defects. On a microscale, it can be phase balance
assessments from weld cap to weld root or a check for non-metallic or third
phase precipitates. Examination of weld growth patterns is also used to
determine reasons for poor mechanical test results. For example, an
extensive central columnar grain pattern can cause a plane of weakness
giving poor Charpy results.
A5-1
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Photomacrographs
A5-2
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Training
Macroscopic
A5-3
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Training Macro 1
1
10 2
8 4
5
7
6
A5-4
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
1 What is the indication at position 1 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Slag inclusions.
b Porosity.
c Excessive grain size.
d Tungsten inclusions.
e Accept.
f Reject.
a Fusion zone.
b Fusion boundary.
c Toe of the weld.
d Under cut.
a Fusion boundary.
b Acid marks.
c Polished area.
d Heat affected zone.
4 What is the indication at position 4 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
5 What is the indication at position 5 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Gas cavity.
b Lack of sidewall fusion.
c Slag trapped at the toes of the weld.
d Lack of interrun fusion and slag.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A5-5
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
6 What is the indication at position 6 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Slag inclusion.
b Lack of root fusion.
c Lack of root penetration.
d Burn-through.
e Accept.
f Reject.
7 What is the indication at position 7 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
8 What is the indication at position 8 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Lamellar tearing.
b Hydrogen cracks.
c Laminations.
d Stress cracks.
e Accept.
f Reject.
9 What is the indication at position 9 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Overlap.
b Toe of the weld with good transition.
c Toe of the weld with poor transition.
d Undercut at the toe of the weld.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A5-6
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Training Macro 2
2
10
8 4
6
7
A5-7
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
1 What is the indication at position 1 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
2 What is the indication at position 2 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Undercut.
b Poor toe blend.
c Underfill.
d Lack of sidewall fusion.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 What is the indication at position 3 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Lamellar tearing.
b Corrosion crack.
c Hydrogen crack.
d Lamination.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 What is the indication at position 4 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
A5-8
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5 What is the indication at position 5 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Toe crack.
b Hydrogen crack.
c Overlap.
d Lamellar tear.
e Accept.
f Reject.
6 What is the indication at position 6 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Spatter.
b Lap.
c Overlap.
d Hydrogen crack.
e Accept.
f Reject.
7 What is the indication at position 7 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Gas cavity.
b Silicon inclusion.
c Slag inclusion.
d Copper inclusion.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A5-9
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
10 What is the indication at position 10 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Slag line.
b Overlap.
c Lamination.
d Lamellar tear.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A5-10
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Training Macro 3
10
9
2
8
3
5
7 4
A5-11
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
1 What is the indication at position 1 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Linear crack.
b Overspill.
c Overlap.
d Lamination.
e Accept.
f Reject .
2 What is the indication at position 2 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Saw marks.
b Lamellar tear.
c Segregation bands.
d Laminations.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 What is the indication at position 3 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Mechanical damage.
b Lap.
c Arc strike.
d Lamellar tear.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 What is the indication at position 4 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
A5-12
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5 What is the indication at position 5 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Slag.
b Silicon.
c Spatter.
d Copper.
e Accept.
f Reject.
6 What is the indication at position 6 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Overlap.
b Crack.
c Incomplete root penetration.
d Incomplete root fusion.
e Accept.
f Reject.
7 What is the indication at position 7 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Transverse crack.
b Transverse hydrogen crack.
c Lack of interrun fusion.
d Shrinkage crack.
e Accept.
f Reject.
8 What is the indication at position 8 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
9 What is the indication at position 9 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Slag inclusion.
b Silicon inclusion.
c Gas cavity.
d Shrinkage defect.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A5-13
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
10 What is the indication at position 10 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Porosity.
b Slag inclusion in weld metal.
c Silicon inclusions in weld metal.
d Tungsten inclusions in weld metal.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A5-14
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Training Macro 4
1
2
10
9 7 6
8
A5-15
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
2 What is the indication at position 2 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Overlap.
b Toe of the weld with good transition.
c Toe of the weld with poor transition.
d Undercut at the toe of the weld.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 What is the indication at position 3 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Undercut.
b Poor toe blend.
c Underfill.
d Lack of sidewall fusion.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 What is the indication at position 4 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Lack of interfusion.
b Lack of sidewall fusion and slag.
c Weld boundary.
d Lack of side wall fusion and silicon.
e Accept.
f Reject.
5 What is the indication at position 5 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Silicon inclusion.
b Slag inclusion, lack of sidewall fusion and lack of inter run fusion.
c Gas cavity.
d Gas cavity, lack of sidewall penetration.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A5-16
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
a Shrinkage.
b Linear distortion.
c Short transverse distortion.
d Angular distortion.
e Accept.
f Reject.
7 What is the indication at position 7 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Silicon inclusion.
b Slag inclusion.
c Slag inclusion, lack of inter-run fusion and lack of sidewall fusion.
d Elongated gas pore.
e Accept.
f Reject.
8 What is the indication at position 8 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Crack.
b Lack of inter-run fusion.
c Lack of sidewall fusion.
d Fusion boundary line.
e Accept.
f Reject.
10 What is the indication at position 10 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Lamellar tearing.
b Hydrogen cracks.
c Laminations.
d Stress cracks.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A5-17
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Training Macro 5
2
3
10
1 5
6
9
7
8
A5-18
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
1 What is the indication at position 1 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Mechanical damage.
b Lap.
c Arc strike.
d Lamellar tear.
e Accept.
f Reject.
2 What is the indication at position 2 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Lamellar tearing.
b Hydrogen cracks.
c Laminations.
d Stress cracks.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 What is the indication at position 3 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Undercut.
b Poor toe blend.
c Underfill.
d Lack of sidewall fusion.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 What is the indication at position 4 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Undercut.
b Poor toe blend.
c Underfill.
d Lack of sidewall fusion.
e Accept.
f Reject.
A5-19
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
5 What is the indication at position 5 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
6 What is the indication at position 6 and would you accept or reject the indication
to the given acceptance levels?
a Shrinkage.
b Linear misalignment.
c Short transverse distortion.
d Transition weld set-up.
e Accept.
f Reject.
a Fusion boundary.
b Acid marks.
c Polished area.
d Heat affected zone.
A5-20
www.twitraining.com
Rev 1 November 2010
Appendix 5 Macro and Micro Visual Inspection
Copyright TWI Ltd 2011
Macro 1 Macro 2
1 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 1 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f
2 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f 2 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
3 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f
4 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e 4f 4 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e 4f
5 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 5f 5 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 5f
6 6a 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 6 6a 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f
7 7a 7b 7c 7d 7e 7f 7 7a 7b 7c 7d 7e 7f
8 8a 8b 8c 8d 8e 8f 8 8a 8b 8c 8d 8e 8f
9 9a 9b 9c 9d 9e 9f 9 9a 9b 9c 9d 9e 9f
10 10a 10b 10c 10d 10e 10f 10 10a 10b 10c 10d 10e 10f
Macro 3 Macro 4
1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 1 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f
1
2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f 2 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
2
3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f
3
4a 4b 4c 4d 4e 4f 4 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e 4f
4
5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 5f 5 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 5f
5
6a 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f 6 6a 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f
6
7a 7b 7c 7d 7e 7f 7 7a 7b 7c 7d 7e 7f
7
8a 8b 8c 8d 8e 8f 8 8a 8b 8c 8d 8e 8f
8
9a 9b 9c 9d 9e 9f 9 9a 9b 9c 9d 9e 9f
9
10a 10b 10c 10d 10e 10f 10 10a 10b 10c 10d 10e 10f
10
Macro 5
1 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f
2 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f
3 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f
4 4a 4b 4c 4d 4e 4f
5 5a 5b 5c 5d 5e 5f
6 6a 6b 6c 6d 6e 6f
7 7a 7b 7c 7d 7e 7f
8 8a 8b 8c 8d 8e 8f
9 9a 9b 9c 9d 9e 9f
A5-21
www.twitraining.com