A Smarter Way of Preventative Maintenance 02
A Smarter Way of Preventative Maintenance 02
A Smarter Way of Preventative Maintenance 02
Any information or advice found within this eBook is my opinion based on years of experience.
You should always seek the advice of a professional and review any regulatory requirements
before acting on the advice or recommendations within.
There are links contained within this eBook that may direct the reader to High Performance
Reliabilitys services, products or resources and to third party providers or resources.
No part of this publication shall be reproduced, transmitted, or sold in whole or in part in any
form, without the prior written consent of the author. All trademarks, and registered trademarks
appearing in the guide are the property of their respective owners.
Readers of this guide are advised to do their own due diligence when it comes to making
changes to a Preventative Maintenance routine or Equipment Strategy as the changes can
greatly affect the reliability of the manufacturing process and hence the profitability of the
business. By reading this eBook, you agree that myself, and High Performance Reliability is not
responsible for the success or failure of the improvements in the business relating to any
information presented in this guide.
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 2
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
James Kovacevic
Founder High Performance Reliability
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 3
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 5
Write a Repeatable PM Procedure .......................................................................................................... 14
Evaluate PM Effectiveness ...................................................................................................................... 16
Continuous Improvement ........................................................................................................................ 17
Tool Box Talk PM Feedback................................................................................................................. 19
Final Words ................................................................................................................................................ 20
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 4
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 5
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 7
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 8
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 9
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
accurately predicted and there are no overlooked, but can create a great
warning signs? There is little that can starting point.
be done to prevent or detect the failure.
In most circumstances, where there is Regardless of which approach is used,
no way to prevent or detect the failure, the frequency must be shorter than the
and the consequences dictate that the P-F interval. The P-F interval is the time
equipment cannot be left to fail than it takes from the start of a failure
basic care should be used. (Potential Failure) occurring to the time
it actually fails (Failure).
Basic care is the ensuring that the
equipment is clean, lubricated and
settings are correct. This basic care
should be developed as a Time Based
Cleaning & lubrication PM Routine.
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 10
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
proceed any further. To many times, I This single step will dramatically assist
have seen PM workloads extremely in reducing the total reoccurring PM
high, as the P-F interval is not workload.
understood, and despite all of the hard
work, results do not arise from the CBM DID YOU KNOW?
activities.
Run to Failure (RTF) is often not viewed as a
viable option. It is felt that all failures must
Does It Make Financial Sense? be prevented. This is a costly
The last criteria to determine if a PM misunderstanding. What must be
routine should be implemented is to prevented are the consequences of the
ensure that it makes financial sense. failure, not the failure itself. So if the failure
For example, does it make sense to results in minimal risk to the site, the most
cost effective option is RTF.
spend 4 hours each week performing
inspections and cleaning activities to The RTF option must be decided only after
prevent a failure that results in 30 the analysis has been completed and risk
seconds of downtime? The answer evaluated.
depends on the industry, but I am
betting the answer is no.
Who Will Do The Work?
Remember, that the best maintenance The final step to designing the Smart
programs are aligned with the business PM Routine is to determine who will do
needs. So unless the business requires the work. The most common answer is
99.9% uptime, chances are a little the maintenance technicians, but often
downtime will be accepted to offset the the operator is the ideal candidate to
tremendous amount of overtime and perform many of the inspections and
wasted time of the technicians. cleaning activities.
Do not be afraid to say that the PM The operators are at the machine, and
routine does not make sense based on will be able to take advantage of any
the cost of downtime vs the cost of the time to clean the equipment. They can
PM routines. By doing so the business also take process readings as the
consciously adopted a run to failure equipment is running.
approach and is completely acceptable,
provided there are no significant risks or The more activities that can be
consequences from that failure. transitioned to the operators, the more
time the maintenance technicians will
have for more skilled work, providing
greater value to the business.
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 11
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 12
Ref Failure Mode Root Cause of Failure Conseque Pr Se Risk Warning Signs or Frequency Financially Who Will
No. nce type Estimated Life of Task Acceptable Do the
Work?
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
13
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 15
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
Evaluate PM Effectiveness
With the PM routine in place and moving safety related? If unsure, review
along, the outcomes of the PM routine against the consequences and
needs to be evaluated to ensure the risk levels defined above.
business needs are met. Is the inspection method being
applied appropriate for the
How do we ensure that the smart PM specific failure mode we are trying
routines we are completing are in fact to address? Are there specific
adding value to the site and improving measures or criteria that the
performance? Here are a few quick equipment is evaluated against,
steps that can help you evaluate the and will provide warning of a
effectiveness of the smart PM. Potential Failure?
Is the inspection being conduct
Do the Math properly? Ensure the PM
Evaluating the effectiveness of the PM procedure is written with detail
routines is as simple as basic and requires specific as-found
arithmetic. Anyone of the principles measurements to prevent pencil
below can be used to evaluate the PM whipping.
routines, depending on which data is Is the frequency of the inspection
available. correct? The inspection interval
Is the cost of doing the PM more should be half of the time required
than the consequences we are for the problem to enter the
trying to avoid? system and fail. This allows two
Is the PM routine developing opportunities to mitigate the
follow up work at least once out consequences prior to failure
of every five inspections? If the answer to these questions are No,
Is the PM routine discovering at then the PM routine needs to go through
least 30 minutes of follow up a detailed revision or it is removed.
work for every 1 hour of PM work? Remember that only 11% of failures are
If the PM routine does not meet any of age related, so it is vitally important that
the above, then it may not be providing most of the PM routines are condition
the right value to the business. But
based.
before removing the PM routines
The Fine Line
Stop and Think There is a fine line between doing too
Before stopping any PM routines that much, too little, and just the right
did not pass the criteria above, certain amount of PM. As seen, there is a point
questions must be asked to ensure that at which equipment reliability adds too
the business is not put at risk.
much unnecessary costs, therefore the
Does this PM routine preserve the
optimum level of PM must be defined
manufacturing output or is it
within the needs of the business.
regulatory, environmental, or
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 16
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
Continuous Improvement
The final step in the Smarter PM proactive work to address
process, involves taking the learnings breakdowns
from the technicians and the previous
To assist in educating the technicians in
steps and further improving the routine.
the value of providing feedback, and
what is required a toolbox talk has been
Evaluating the PM routines with the
developed and provided on page 19.
criteria defined in the previous steps will
Use the toolbox talk to launch the
generate significant results to the
program to start receiving feedback and
business. However one of the greatest
to periodically refresh the memories of
sources of improvements to the PM
why the feedback is provided.
routine is the feedback and input from
the maintenance technicians. WHATS IN IT FOR ME (WIFFM)
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 18
TOOL BOX TALK PM FEEDBACK
COPYRIGHT 2015
High Performance Reliability Belle River, ON
For Questions and assistance, Canada
please email www.HPReliability.com
info@HPReliability.com
A SMARTER WAY OF PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
Final Words
Congratulations Once the PM routines are improved, it
on taking a step to will take time to see the results in the
improving the equipment performance.
profitability of
your business and Continue the Learning
contributing to a Dont be afraid to ask for help. Many
prosperous people, including myself are happy to
community. I help you out.
know I have provided a lot of Continue to stay up to date with the
information in this eBook, but you now latest by following High Performance
have the knowledge to make a Reliability on Twitter, Facebook and
difference with smarter preventative myself on LinkedIn.
maintenance. Here are a few final
thoughts Id like to share with you Please!
Please do not share this eBook. I put a
The Results You Achieve Are Up lot of time into the creation of it and
To You would appreciate it if you would refer
What you apply from this eBook and the anyone interested in it to this link to get
rigour in which it is applied will greatly a copy for themselves
affect the results you achieve.
Start small by applying the Thank You!
techniques in this eBook for an
hour a week. I hope you enjoyed this eBook as much as I enjoyed
writing it for you.
Dont worry about perfection,
I appreciate each and every one of you for taking the
thats why the 4th step is
time out to read this, and if you have an extra
continuous improvement. The second, I would love to hear what you think about it.
PM routine is continuously
evolving, based on experience Please leave a comment on twitter (@HPReliability)
and learnings. or on my Facebook Page. If you prefer to provide
feedback in private, you can send me an email. I will
Lastly, Results take time and this read each and every comment and work to improve
is no exception. this eBook.
Thanks again, and I wish you nothing but success in
your journey to improved maintenance and
reliability.
James Kovacevic
Founder of High Performance Reliability
james.kovacevic@HPReliability.com
WWW.HPRELIABILITY.COM 20
High Performance Reliability 2015
All Rights Reserved