Rui Zhan and Xieeryazidan Adayi
Rui Zhan and Xieeryazidan Adayi
Rui Zhan and Xieeryazidan Adayi
1, 2016
Han Ding
State Key Laboratory of High-performance Complex Manufacturing,
Central South University,
Changsha 410083, China
Email: dinghan0204@163.com
Abstract: Distinguished with some basic theory and approaches of traditional tooth surface
design, the spiral bevel gear with new tooth surface, namely spherical involute tooth surface, is
investigated. Firstly, it improved its formational principle based on the spherical involute theory.
As a key part, the parametric equation of the generating line was made a detailed derivation.
To this end, fast and accurate solutions of the boundary curves and the tooth profile curve
family are accomplished, respectively. Then, taking advantages of modelling techniques of cubic
non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) curve and surface in CAD/CAM, a reconstruction
method for the spherical involute tooth surface was proposed to enhance the precision. At last,
related optimisation schemes associated with constructed NURBS tooth surface are utilised to
obtain the parameterisation of tooth surface data and higher-accuracy fitting. Given numerical
examples indicate that the accuracy of the tooth surface is obviously enhanced and is enough to
provide gear finite element (FEM) analysis the data and the basic model in its digitised design
and manufacturing.
Keywords: spiral bevel gear; spherical involute tooth surface; generating line; cubic NURBS;
reconstruction method; higher-accuracy fitting.
Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Zhan, R., Adayi, X. and Ding, H. (2016)
Formational principle and accurate fitting methodology for a new tooth surface of the spiral
bevel gear, Int. J. Simulation and Process Modelling, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.7684.
Biographical notes: Rui Zhan is a Master degree candidate from the School of Mechanical
Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
His areas of research include the special electrochemical processing, digitised design and
manufacturing of the spiral bevel and hypoid gear.
Han Ding is currently a PhD student at State Key Laboratory of High-Performance Complex
Manufacturing, Central South University, China. He has contributed about ten research papers in
journals and conferences at home and abroad level. His area of research includes manufacture
method for the spiral bevel and hypoid gear.
referred to as the work tooth surface. Now, for brevity, surface. The equation of spherical involute K0Kt can be
working tooth surface as a main subject is made a detailed expressed by the spherical deflection angle k at any point K
description, because each part of the whole tooth surface as follows:
has a good agreement. It is worth noting that the tooth
surface means the work tooth surface in rest of this present
paper.
=
arc cos ( cos b )
sin b (
arc cos tan b
tan ) (1)
Figure 1 Composition of spherical involute tooth surface Figure 2 Formation of the spherical involute tooth surface
(see online version for colours) (see online version for colours)
(a)
x = Rn sin b cos n And then, the spiral rotation angle n is solved by the
following formula:
y = Rn sin b sin n (n = 0,1, 2...t ) (3)
z = R cos tan n
n b
n = (5)
sin
Moreover
where represents pressure angle of the spiral bevel gear
R0 Rn Rt (4)
and n represents spiral angle at any points on the toe and
where R0 and Rt are distance from the heel and toe from the heel that can be obtained by the following approach (Zeng,
vertex on base cone surface, respectively. 1989). As tooth trace of the spiral bevel and hyoid gear
denoted in Figure 4, Figure 4(a) is its formation process in
Figure 3 Solution of the generating line the machining state, and Figure 4(b) is a schematic view of
its geometry.
1
( Rn ) + 2rc R p sin R p2
2
n = arc sin (6)
2 Rn
where rc means the radius of the cutter head, Sd indicates
cutter location, Rp signifies cone distance in correspondence
with the nominal spiral angle .
Figure 4 Tooth trace of the spiral bevel gear (see online version
for colours)
N
i =0 j =0
i ,3 (u ) N j ,3 (v )Wi , jVi , j
S (u , v) = n m
(7)
N
i =0 j =0
i ,3 (u ) N j ,3 (v )Wi , j
(a) 1, ui u ui +1
Ni ,0 (u ) =
0, the others
u ui u u
Ni ,3 (u ) = N i ,2 (u ) + i + 3+1 N i +1,2 (u ) (9)
ui + 3 ui ui + 3 +1 ui +1
0 = 0
0
(b)
80 R. Zhan et al.
Step 1 Construction of an internal cross-section curve Wi(i = 0, 1, , n) is weighting factors, and Bi,3(u)
family. is the cubic B-spline base function. NURBS curve
interpolation can be performed with anti-calculated
Firstly, combined with proposed equation of the
control vertices Vi(i = 0, 1, ..., n) and weighting
generating line, the graphics were drawn through
factor Wi(i = 0, 1, ..., n) that must meet the
the relevant CAD software (Luis et al., 2014).
conditions, so as to complete fitting the boundaries.
Then, it needs to gain some points with equal
Their specific anti-calculation procedure has been
divided segments onto generating line. Here, the
given a detailed answer in the reference (Piegl and
number of points with equal length n can be solved
Tiller, 1997).
according to the following formula:
Step 3 Solution of the node vector.
R0 Rt
n= (m = 0,1,..., t 1) (10) In this paper, a modified radial accumulated chord
Rm Rm +1
length parameter method (Piegl and Tiller, 1997)
After getting equal division points kn, they were was applied to solve them through the formula:
submitted into related graphics software. In
Si 4 Si 5 i 4
addition to, after accomplishing the positional
relationship of circle plane and the base cone, 3 Si 4 Si 5 Si 3 Si 4
based on ration function selected in software, a ki 3 = 1 + 2 Si 4 Si 5 i 3
serial of tooth profile curves can be obtained in +
light of spherical involute tooth formational S i 3 S i 4 S i 2 Si 3
principle. These tooth profile curves are depicted ki 3 S i 3 S i 4
as an internal cross-section curve family of the ui 3 = (12)
n +1
tooth surface. To facilitate the NURBS fitting
procedure, cross-sectional family of curves is
i =4
ki 3 S i 3 S i 4
denoted as
v-direction curve family S(v). i 3 = min Si 4 Si 3 S2 ,
2
Step 2 Identification of the main boundary curves.
S1 S0 = Sn 1 Sn 2
As shown in Figure 5, main boundaries of a
spherical involute tooth surface should be where S presents u-direction node, i = 1,2, , n.
constituted by the working tooth profile S(v = 0) of Step 4 Unified each node vector.
the heel and S(v = 1) of the toe, the tooth top arc
S(u = 1) and the generating line namely fillet curve Each section curve vector (set as the u-direction)
S(u = 0). Among them, the starting one of needs to do some numerical operations. Nodes can
u-direction curve family is the generating line be inserted new ones in order to ensure the shape,
S(u = 0) which is solved out. And S(u = 1) has been then each section curve to calculate their control
explicated to make cubic NURBS fitting. After vertices again to get a new unified one.
getting a tooth profile with a computer program, it Step 5 Solution of the u-direction control vertices.
needs to simulate space motion trajectory of
aliquots points at the generating line. Data at the According to solution of u-direction control points
other end points are extracted to make fitting and of the transition fillet curve, the average data of
written as a set of data points Pn. As a result of data uniform node vectors is regarded as their new node
points aliquots, their weighting factors hn(n = 0, 1, vector. Then, the required control points as data
..., t) may be selected sequentially and points, one by one anti-calculations of the
equivalently. u-direction control vertices are made. Resulting
vertices after their process are shown in Figure 6.
Therefore, a cubic NURBS curve can be expressed
as: Step 6 Skinning operation
Figure 5 Internal cross-section curve family and boundary existent minimum distance from the surface. In this
mapping process, the data points need to satisfy the
following equation:
{ }
( P ( ui , vi ) + J ( ui , vi )( ui , vi ) ) Pi Pu ( ui , vi ) = 0
{ }
( P ( ui , vi ) + J ( ui , vi )( ui , vi ) ) Pi Pv ( ui , vi ) = 0 (13)
s.t. ( ui , vi ) <
corresponding weights. As represented in Figure 8, data based on the universal machine tools are 40.9 m on
points after accurate fitting are in good smoothness. concave and 33.8 m on convex respectively. In the
reference (Kawasaki and Tsuji, 2010), the tooth flank with
Figure 8 Data points on tooth surface after accurate fitting error 24 m is used to TCA. With the comparison above
(see online version for colours) results, it clearly indicates a higher-accuracy after
application of the proposed methodologies.
As shown in Figure 11, in establishment of provided
FEM model, it utilises hexahedral mesh to make operation
to reflect the quality of the real model and reduce the size of
the analysis model, in the premise of meeting the accuracy
of the analysis. Then, in the guarantee of the accuracy and
efficiency of the FEM analysis, it provides 128,316 meshes
which is less than the quarter of completely consistent
model with a total of 524,433 meshes, and the size of the
tooth surface element in the mesh area is about 1mm. At
last, gear drive model after reconstruction and optimisation
are submitted into the FEM software, which can indicates it
is enough applicable to make some FEM analyses such as
TCA, LTCA and so on in follow-up studies.
To this end, with comparison of after and before
optimisation, the model with this error accuracy can meet
5 Numerical examples the requirement of gear applications, and the proposed
With application of the formational principle of the methodologies about gear reconstruction and optimisation
spherical involute surface with basic parameters in Table 1, has a good validity.
the model of spiral bevel gear can be obtained. The
Table 1 Main parameters of the modelling of the spiral bevel
modelling error is conventionally evaluated by the root
gear
mean-squared error (RSME) of each tooth surface. As
shown on the right in Figure 9, tooth error with 5 9 data Normal Pitch Outer
Tooth
points after cubic NURBS reconstruction is represented, Module pressure cone cone
number
where the left is the error flank, and the right is the error (m /mm) angle angle distance
(z)
distribution. The maximum error is 4.875 m, the minimum (/) (/) (Ra/ mm)
error is 34.473 m and RSME of tooth error is 18.274 m. 46 8.220 20 71.9395 152.40
Some larger error values are mainly distributed in the two Nominal
ends. As shown in Figure 10, it is the tooth error after Tooth Base cone Root cone Top cone
spiral
width angle angle angle
optimisation and has been significantly reduced. The angle
(B/mm) (b/) (f/) (a/)
maximum error is 12.418 m, the minimum error is (/)
3.6324 m and RSME is 8.4363 m. In the reference 28.573 16.5908 35 68.6585 73.4881
(Shih and Chen, 2012), RMSEs before tooth modification
Figure 9 Tooth error after NURBS reconstruction, (a) error surface (b) error distribution (see online version for colours)
(a) (b)
Formational principle and accurate fitting methodology for a new tooth surface of the spiral bevel gear 83
Piegl, L.A. and Tiller, W. (2001) Parameterization for surface Sun, Y., Liu, H. and Liu, J. (2004) Research on the method of
fitting in reverse engineering, Computer Aided Design, accurate NURBS surface fitting to scattered points, Chinese
Vol. 33, No. 8, pp.593603. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp.1014
Roman, . and Marek, S. (2015) Production function (in Chinese).
implementation in an agent-based simulation, Intrtnational Vogel, O., Griewank, A. and Br, G. (2002) Direct gear tooth
Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, Vol. 10, No. 2, contact analysis for hypoid bevel gears, Computer
pp.156162. Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 191,
Shih, Y.P. and Chen, S.D. (2012) Free-form flank correction in No. 36, pp.39653982.
helical gear grinding using a five-axis computer numerical Wang, P.Y. and Fong, Y.H. (2006) Fourth-order kinematic
control gear profile grinding machine, ASME Journal synthesis for face-milling spiral bevel gears with modified
of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 134, No. 4, radial motion (MRM) correction, ASME Journal of
p.041006. Mechanical Design, Vol. 128, No. 2, pp.457467.
Shunmugam, M.S., Rao, B.S. and Jayapakash, V. (1998) Weiss, V. and Andor, L. (2002) Advanced surface
Establishing gear tooth surface geometry and normal fitting techniques, Computer Aided Design, Vol. 19, No. 1,
deviation, Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp.1942.
pp.525534. Yang, Z.J., Li, L.N. and Wang, Y.K. (2011) Basic principle and
Simon, V.V. (2014) Optimal machine-tool settings for the mathematical model of cutting hypoid gears by generating
manufacture of face-hobbed spiral bevel gears, ASME J. line method, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 154155,
Mech. Des., Vol. 136, No. 8, p.081004. pp.113118.
Suh, S.H. Jih, W.S. and Hong, H.D. (2001) Sculptured surface Zeng, T. (1989) Design and Manufacture of Spiral Bevel Gears,
machining of spiral bevel gears with CNC milling, Harbin Institute of Technology Press, Harbin (in Chinese).
International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture,
Vol. 41, No. 6, pp.833850.
Suh, S.H., Jung, D.H. and Lee, E.S. (2003) Modeling,
Implementation and manufacturing of spiral bevel gears
with crown, The International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 21, pp.775786.