Reply Affidavit
Reply Affidavit
Reply Affidavit
Department of Justice
NATIONAL PROSECUTION SERVICE
OFFICE OF THE PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR
Tagum City, Davao del Norte
ESTHER V. VALIENTE,
Complainant,
REPLY AFFIDAVIT
I, ESTHER V. VALIENTE, respectfully submit hereunder to
this Honorable Office, my reply to the Counter Affidavits of DR. RHEA
DOLOR C. BRILLANTES, DR. RICHARD T. MATA, and
BETHYL P. ISTURIS, RN of METROPOLITAN POLYMEDIC
COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. (MPCH):
2. It can be said through their medical expertise that Phlebitis does not
correspond with the cause of death of the patient. But, the mere fact
that they only managed to remove the dextrose when the inflammation
is obviously and seriously evident constitutes their utter neglect on
the condition of the patient;
3. Further, they removed the offending needle of the dextrose only in the
moment that I complained that the patients left arm is in terrible
pain and is noticeably and badly swollen. It should be noted that if
thorough observance to the patients left arm when they are
managing the patients dextrose has been done properly or if detected
such inflammation on its minimal stage, it could prevented the
later aggravated condition of the patients left arm that might
resulted into another infection since the patient had another fever;
4. The pictures that were firstly submitted were NOT grossly tampered
or distorted in some way in order to exaggerate the presentation of
the condition of the patients left arm (Paragraph 11 of Dr. Richard
T. Matas Counter Affidavit). Such claim is invalid since we dont
have any means or access to such photo-editing softwares or any
mode of tampering photo films or printed photos.
ESTHER V. VALIENTE
Complainant
Copy furnished:
EXPLANATION
Esther V. Valiente