Applied Surface Science: Tien-Tsai Wu, Jyh-Ming Ting
Applied Surface Science: Tien-Tsai Wu, Jyh-Ming Ting
Applied Surface Science: Tien-Tsai Wu, Jyh-Ming Ting
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: True exible dye-sensitized solar cell were fabricated and characterized. Titanium foil and indium tin
Received 29 April 2015 oxide coated polyethylene naphthalate were used as the substrates for the photoanode and the counter
Received in revised form 24 July 2015 electrode, respectively. Two types of titanium dioxide (TiO2 ) powders were used for making the pho-
Accepted 12 August 2015
toanodes, namely, commercial TiO2 particles and homemade TiO2 mesoporous beads. Reduced graphene
Available online 14 August 2015
oxide (RGO) was included in selected photoanodes to improve the electrical conductivity. The cells were
fabricated with or without a TiO2 compact layer (CL). The effects of CL, RGO addition, and the use of
Keywords:
mesoporous TiO2 beads on the cell performance are presented and discussed. We demonstrated that the
Titanium dioxide
Reduced graphene oxide
optimized combination of CL, RGO, and the beads improves the cell efciency by as much as 154%.
Flexible dye-sensitized solar cells 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Compact layer
Titanium substrates
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.100
0169-4332/ 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
T.-T. Wu, J.-M. Ting / Applied Surface Science 356 (2015) 868874 869
photoanode substrate. The effects of CL, RGO addition, and the use
of mesoporous TiO2 beads on the cell performance are presented
and discussed. We demonstrate that the optimized combination of
CL, RGO, and the beads improves the cell efciency by 154%.
2. Experimental
The graphene oxide (GO) used for making RGO was rst pre-
pared using a modied Hummers method as descried elsewhere
[20,21]. The TiO2 powders used include commercial TiO2 parti-
cles (P25) and homemade TiO2 beads, which were synthesized
using a microwave-assisted hydrothermal method [8]. To prepare
the paste for screen printing [22], TiO2 powders were mixed with
ethanol at a weight ratio of 1/5 with or without the addition of
GO. The obtained suspension was then mixed with pure ethyl cel-
lulose powders (Fluka) and anhydrous terpineol (#86480, Fluka).
The resulting paste was then placed in a rotary-evaporator for the
removal of ethanol to obtain the paste consisting of 18 wt% of TiO2 ,
9 wt% of ethyl cellulose, and 73 wt% of terpineol [23]. A total of 6
different pastes, having different TiO2 powders and with or without
the addition of GO, were made: P25 only (designated as P hereafter
in), P25 and GO with a predetermined weight ratio of 110/1 (PG)
[19], TiO2 Beads only (B), TiO2 beads and GO with a predetermined
weight ratio of 110/1 (BG).
Photoanodes were then made using a screen printing method
followed by sintering at 450 C for 40 min. The substrate used was
titanium foil (thickness = 0.27 mm). The Ti foil was rst pre-treated
by sonication in a diamond powder suspension. The polished Ti
was then coated with a thin TiO2 CL. For comparison, some Ti was
not coated with TiO2 CL. The photoanodes were examined using
scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM Jeol JEM-2100F),
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, PHI 5000 VersaProbe), and
UVVis spectrophotometer (Hewlett Packard 8453). XPS analysis
was performed using a 1486.6 eV Al anode as the X-ray source.
Gold was deposited on the sample surface for calibration during
the XPS measurement. The charging effect on the XPS sample was
corrected by the Au 4f PES peaks. A linear background was used for
the background correction. The photoanodes subjected to UVVis
spectrophotometry analysis were deposited on ITO glass. A total
of 6 different photoanodes were made from the aforementioned 6
different pastes. The photoanodes and the pastes share the same
sample IDs.
The obtained photoanodes were made into DSCs using the
method described in Ref. 7. The dye was cis-bis-(isothio-cyanato)
bis (2,20-bipyridyl-4,40-dicarboxylato)-ruthenium(II)bis-
tetrabutylammonium. The electrolyte consisted of 0.1 M LiI, 0.05 M
I2, 0.6 M 1,2-dimethyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide, and 0.5 M 4-
tert-butylpyridine in 3-methoxypropionitrile system. The counter
electrode was Pt deposited on indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated
polyethylene naphthalate (PEN). IV measurements of the cells
were made under AM 1.5 simulated sunlight (100 mW cm2 ) using
a 450 W xenon arc lamp (LH 151, Spectral Energy Co.). The incident
Fig. 1. (a) SEM image of homemade TiO2 beads. (b) Enlarged image showing the
light intensity was calibrated with a radiometer photometer beads are mesoporous and solid. (c) XRD pattern of as-synthesized beads.
(ILT 1400-A). Impedance spectra were obtained using intensity-
modulated photocurrent/photovoltage spectroscopy (IMPS/VS)
solid. It is seen that the sizes of the as-synthesized beads are very
(Zahner) under blue light (wavelength = 455 nm). Incident photon-
uniform. The as-synthesized beads exhibit anatase phase as shown
to-electron conversion efciency (IPCE) was measured using EQ-R
in Fig. 1(c), which also shows that the precursor sol-gel particles
(Enlitech) in a wavelength range of 300800 nm.
are amorphous.
Photoanodes were then made using the obtained beads with or
3. Results and discussion without P25 and/or graphene. These photoanodes with the addi-
tion of GO are rst presented to show the bridging of TiO2 by the
Fig. 1(a) shows an SEM image of the beads obtained. The beads obtained RGO. As shown below, the GO added into TiO2 powders
have an average diameter of 630 63 nm, are mesorporous, and became reduced GO (RGO) after the fabrication of photoanode.
consist of a large amount of small nanoparticles, as shown in Fig. 2 shows TEM images of Photoanode PG. Fig. 2(a) is a general
Fig. 1(b). The broken bead in Fig. 1(b) also shows that the beads are view showing that the few-layered RGO (enclosed by the dashed
870 T.-T. Wu, J.-M. Ting / Applied Surface Science 356 (2015) 868874
Table 1
Bonding type and concentration of various samples.
Bonding GO PG BG
Fig. 3. (a) TEM image showing that RGO sheets serve as bridges among TiO2 beads
in photoanode BG (b) Enlarged image showing the intimate contact between RGO
and TiO2 bead.
Fig. 5. (a) Optical absorbance of Photoanodes P, B, PG, and BG. (b) Absorbance
normalized to the thickness.
in general the use of a CL, the addition of RGO, or using beads as the
photoanode material reduces the normalized diffusion time d,norm .
Also, the addition of RGO apparently increases the photoelectron
lifetime n . Fig. 6(c) shows the dark currents of various cells. Com-
pact layer is known to reduce the dark current (P/Ti vs. P/CL/Ti and
PG/Ti vs. PG/CL/Ti). RGO addition or a bead-containing photoanode
reduces the charge recombination in the photoanode [5,19]. This
leads to a higher photoelectrons density in the photoanode and
hence a lower value of d,norm or an enhanced diffusion rate. The
enhanced diffusion rate by the addition of RGO is apparent since the
RGO bridges (Figs. 2 and 3) provide much lower transport resistance
[19]. The higher electron diffusion rate also results in less recombi-
nation, therefore effectively reduces the dark current as shown in
Fig. 6(c). It was reported that the beads contain much less oxygen
vacancies, as compared to P25, and therefore give faster electron
diffusion rates [4,5]. The less-defected bead-containing photoan-
ode therefore reduces the dark current and enhances the diffusion
rate. For the electron lifetime, n , we rst examine the cells without
RGO in the photoanodes. Comparing Cells P/Ti and P/CL/Ti, the use
of CL increases the photoelectron density, n, as mentioned above.
In general, the recombination rate is proportional to n2 , thereby
a larger photoelectron density would lead to a shorter n for Cell
P/CL/Ti [4,5]. Then we compare Cells P/CL/Ti and B/CL/Ti. With the
replacement of P25 by beads, the oxygen vacancy concentration,
i.e., the number of traps, reduces [5]. As a result, n increases. Now
we discuss the cells with RGO in the photoanodes. It is seen that n
becomes longer with the addition of RGO. Also these cells (PG/Ti,
PG/CL/Ti, BG/CL/Ti) have similar n . This indicates the addition of
RGO governs the photoelectron lifetime. This shows that the RGO
bridges very effectively and dominantly enhance the photoelectron
transport such that the electron trapping is much reduced, result-
ing in longer photoelectron lifetime. Fig. 7(a) shows the JV curves
of the obtained cells. The Jsc , Voc efciency, and ll factors (FF) are
summarized in Table 2. The values of Voc are nearly the same, aver-
aging at 0.660 03 V. The value of Jsc varies, depending on the cell
Fig. 6. (a) IMPS and (b) IMVS measurements, and (c) dark currents of various cells. type. It is seen again that in general the use of a CL, RGO, or beads
increases the Jsc also for the reasons described above. It is also noted
that the value of Jsc matches the integrated IPCE current, as shown
photoanodes. Fig. 6(a) and (b) show the results of IMPS and IMVS in Fig. 8. The values of FF are also different among the cells and show
measurements, respectively. The resulting electron diffusion time the positive effects of using a CL, RGO, or beads. As a result, the con-
d and lifetime n are summarized in Table 2 Also, since the version efciency of the exible DSCs also receives such benets. It
thicknesses of the photoanodes are different, the value of d is nor- is seen that the efciency of a plain P/Ti cell, 1.57%, becomes 3.99%
malized to the thickness, as also shown in Table 2. It is obvious that with the use of a CL, RGO, and beads, i.e., a 154% increase.
T.-T. Wu, J.-M. Ting / Applied Surface Science 356 (2015) 868874 873
Table 2
Data obtained from IMPS/IMVS IPCE and JV measurements.
Cella Photoanode thickness (micron) d (ms) d,norm (ms/micron) n,IMVS (ms) Jsc (mA cm2 ) Voc (V) FF (%)
present and discuss the effects of CL, graphene addition, and the use
of mesoporous TiO2 beads on the cell performance. It is demon-
strated that the optimized combination of CL, reduced graphene
oxide, and the beads improves the cell efciency by as much as
154%.
Acknowledgements
References
[17] S. Satapathi, H.S. Gill, S. Das, L. Li, L. Samuelson, M.J. Green, J. Kumar, [23] S. Ito, T.N. Murakami, P. Comte, P. Liska, C. Grtzel, M.K. Nazeeruddin, M.
Performance enhancement of dye-sensitized solar cells by incorporating Grtzel, Fabrication of thin lm dye sensitized solar cells with solar to electric
graphene sheets of various sizes, Appl. Surf. Sci. 314 (2014) 638641. power conversion efciency over 10%, Thin Solid Films 516 (2008)
[18] L. Qiu, H. Zhang, W. Wang, Y. Chen, R. Wang, Effects of hydrazine hydrate 46134619.
treatment on the performance of reduced graphene oxide lm as counter [24] S.K. Mohapatra, M. Misra, V.K. Mahajan, K.S. Raja, Design of a highly efcient
electrode in dye-sensitized solar cells, Appl. Surf. Sci. 319 (2014) 339343. photoelectrolytic cell for hydrogen generation by water splitting: application
[19] T.T. Wu, J.M. Ting, Bridging TiO2 nanoparticles using graphene for use in of TiO2x Cx nanotubes as a photoanode Pt/TiO2 nanotubes as a cathode, J.
dye-sensitized solar cells, Int. J. Energy Res. 38 (2014) 14381445. Phys. Chem. C 111 (2007) 86778685.
[20] W.S. Hummers, R.E. Offeman, Preparation of graphitic oxide, J. Am. Chem. Soc. [25] W.Y. Wu, T.W. Shih, P. Chen, J.M. Ting, J.M. Chen, Plasma surface treatments of
80 (1958) 1339. TiO2 photoelectrodes for use in dye-sensitized solar cells, J. Electrochem. Soc.
[21] T.T. Wu, J.M. Ting, Preparation characteristics of graphene oxide its thin lms, 158 (2011) K101K106.
Surf. Coat. Technol. 231 (2012) 487491. [26] W.Y. Wu, T.W. Shih, J.M. Ting, Hydrothermally synthesized TiO2 nanopowders
[22] J.E. Hu, S.Y. Yang, J.C. Chou, P.H. Shih, Fabrication of exible dye-sensitised their use as photoanodes in dye-sensitized solar cells, Int. J. Energy Res. 37
solar cells with titanium dioxide thin lms based on screen-printing (2013) 964972.
technique, Micro Nano Lett. 7 (2012) 11621165.