The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual
Chapter 7
60
1. The maintenance expense at time t = 6 is 3000 (1.06 ) = 4255.56 . The projected
6 1
annual return at time t = 6 is 30,000 (.96 ) = 24, 461.18 . Thus,
R6 = 24, 461.18 4255.56 = $20, 206 to the nearest dollar.
4. The equation of value equating the present values of cash inflows and cash outflows is
2, 000, 000 + Xv 5 = 600,000a10 300,000a5 at i = 12% .
Therefore,
X = 600, 000a10 300, 000a5 2, 000, 000 (1.12 )
5
= $544,037.
73
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
6. (a) This Exercise is best solved by using the NPV functionality on a financial
calculator. After entering all the NCFs and setting I = 15%, we compute
NPV = P (.15 ) = $498,666.
(b) We use the same NCFs as in part (a) and compute IRR = 13.72% .
7. (a) The formula for P ( i ) in Exercise 2 has 3 sign changes, so the maximum number
of positive roots is 3.
(b) Yes.
(c) There are no sign changes in the outstanding balances, i.e.
7000 to 3000 to 4000 at i = 0.
Taking into account interest in the range of 9% to 10 % would not be significant
enough to cause any sign changes.
(1 + r )2 2.08 (1 + r ) + 1.0815
which can be factored as
[(1 + r ) 1.05][(1 + r ) 1.03].
Thus, r = .05 and .03, so that i j = .02.
A+B+C = 10, 000 + 3953.87 + 3315.38 = $17, 269 to the nearest dollar.
74
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
so that
i = (1.7269 ) 10 1 = .0562, or 5.62%.
1
11. If the deposit is D, then the reinvested interest is .08 D, .16 D, .24 D,, .80 D . We
must adapt formula (7.7) for an annuity-due rather than an annuity-immediate. Thus,
we have the equation of value
10 D + .08 D ( Is )10 .04 = 1000
so that
1000 1000 1000
D= = = .
( 10 .04 10 ) 2s10 .04 10 s11 .04 12
.08 s
10 + .04
12. The lender will receive a total accumulated value of 1000 s20 .05 = 33,065.95 at the end
of 20 years in exchange for the original loan of 10,000. Thus, we have the equation of
value applying formula (7.9)
10,000 (1 + i ) = 33,065.95
20
and
i = ( 3.306595 )
1
20
1 = .0616, or 6.16%.
13. From formula (7.7) the total accumulated value in five years will be
s5 .03 5
5 (1000 ) + 40 = 5412.18 .
.03
The purchase price P to yield 4% over these five years is
5
P = 5412.18 (1.04 ) = $4448 to the nearest dollar.
so that
(1 + i ) = 2.57575 and i = ( 2.57575 )
24 1
24
1 = .04021.
The answer is
2i = 2 (.04021) = .0804, or 8.04%.
75
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
15. The yield rate is an annual effective rate, while the bond coupons are semiannual.
Adapting formula (7.10) for this situation we have
1000 (1.07 ) = 30s20 j + 1000
10
and
s20 j = 32.23838.
We now use a financial calculator to solve for the unknown rate j to obtain
j = .047597 . The answer is the annual effective rate i equivalent to j, i.e.
i = (1 + j ) 1 = .0975, or 9.75%.
2
and
s21 i = 35.711467.
2
We now use a financial calculator to solve for the unknown rate i to obtain
2
i = .050, so that i = .100, or 10.0%.
2
17. The loan is 25,000 and if it is entirely repaid at the end of one year the amount paid
will be
25, 000 (1.08 ) = 27,000.
This money can be reinvested by the lender at only 6% for the next three years. Thus,
over the entire four-year period we have a lender yield rate of
25,000 (1 + i ) = 27,000 (1.06 ) = 32,157.43
4 3
or
i = (1.286 ) 4 1 = .0649, or 6.49%.
1
76
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
19. We have
3 1
B = 1000 (1.04 ) + 200 1 + (.04 ) 300 1 + (.04 )
4 4
= $943.
21. We have
2, 000, 000 = .08 ( 25,000,000 ) + .04 ( X 2, 200, 000 750, 000 )
= 1,882, 000 + .04 X
and X = 2,950, 000.
Now
B = 25,000,000 + 2,950, 000 + 2, 000,000 2, 200, 000 750,000 = 27, 000, 000.
Finally, we apply formula (7.16) to obtain
2I ( 2 ) ( 2,000,000 )
i= = = .08, or 8%.
A + B I 25,000,000 + 27,000,000 2,000,000
1+ i (1 t ) i
(b) 1t t i = 1 = .
1 + ti 1 + ti
77
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
I I
= = .
A + ( B A I ) (1 k ) kA + (1 k ) B (1 k ) I
24. (a) Yes. The rate changes because the new dates change the denominator in the
calculation of i DW .
(b) No. The rate does not change because the calculation of iTW depends on the
various fund balances, but not the dates of those balances.
or (1 + i ) + (1 + i ) 2.2.
2
1 12 4 (1) ( 2.2 )
Solving the quadratic 1 + i = = 1.06524 rejecting the
( 2 )(1)
negative root. Thus, i DW = i = .0652, or 6.52%.
(b) Over the two-year time period formulas (7.18) and (7.19) give
1200 2200
1 + iTW = = 1.2.
1000 2200
The equivalent annual effective rate is
i = (1 + iTW ) 1 = (1.2 ) 1 = .0954, or 9.54%.
1
2 .5
78
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
2 + (1 + i ) + (1 + i ) 2 3.2136 = 0
1
( )( ) ( )
(1 + i ) 2 = 1 1 4 2 3.2136 = 1.042014
2
1
( 2 )( 2 )
rejecting the negative root. Finally, i DW = i = (1.042014 ) 1 = .0857, or 8.57%.
2
2120 3213.60
(b) 1 + i = = 1.0918
2000 3120
so iTW = .0918 , or 9.81%.
79
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
B C B D C B BD
or
A B + D A B B+D B
which implies that B 2 B 2 D 2 , a contradiction. Therefore we must have
ibTW > icTW .
31. We have
B2 = 10,000 (1.0825 )(1.0825 ) = 11,718.06
B6 = 10,000 (1.0825 )(1.0825 )(1.0840 )(1.0850 )(1.0850 )(1.0835 ) = 16, 202.18
so the amount of interest earned is
B6 B2 = 16, 202.18 11, 718.06 = $4484.12.
80
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
= 1000 (1.31185 ) .
The equivalent level effective rate is
i = (1.31185 ) 3 1 = .0947, or 9.47%.
1
a ( s, t )
36. (a) s ,t = t
= ln a ( s, t ) .
a ( s, t ) t
t
(b) a ( s, s ) = 1 and a ( s, t ) = e 0
s , r dr
.
(c) Using an average portfolio rate
a (t )
a ( s ) a ( s, t ) = a ( t ) and a ( s, t ) = .
a (s)
81
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
(d) a ( 0, t ) = (1 + i ) .
t
37. The margin is 1000m and the interest on it is (.08 )(1000m ) = 80m . The net profit is
200 + 80m 60 = 140 + 80m on a deposit of 1000m . Thus, the yield rate is
140 + 80m 7 + 4m
= .
1000m 50m
40. As transaction:
The margin is (.50 )(1000 ) = 500
Interest on margin = (.60 )( 500 ) = 30
Dividend on the stock = X
Profit on short sale = 1000 P
(1000 P ) + 30 X
Thus, .21 = .
500
Bs transaction:
(1000 P + 25) + 30 2 X
.21 = .
500
Solving the two equations in two unknowns gives
X = $25 and P = $900.
82
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
42. The yield rate in Exercise 2 is between 9% and 10% and thus less than the interest
preference rate of 12%. Thus, the investment should be rejected.
43. The yield rate of the financing arrangement can be determined from the equation of
value
5000 = 2400 + 1500v + 1500v 2
or 1.5v + 1.5v 2.6 = 0.
Solving the quadratic, we have
v= = .90831
( 2 ) (1.5 )
rejecting the negative root. Thus, i = .10095 . Since the buyer would be financing at a
rate higher than the interest preference rate of 10%, the buyer should pay cash.
= 1 + 100i 2 = 0
The graph has a minimum at (0,1) and is an upward quadratic in either direction.
(b) There are no real roots, since the graph does not cross the x-axis.
83
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
46. We have
P ( i ) = 100 + 230 (1 + i ) 132 (1 + i )
1 2
and
P ( i ) = 230 (1 + i ) + 264 (1 + i ) = 0
2 3
so that
(1 + i )1 = 230 i=
264
1 = .1478, or 14.78%.
264 230
48. We have
100 + 132 (1.08 ) = 230 (1 + i )
2 1
213.16872 = 230 (1 + i )
1
so that
230
1+ i = = 1.0790.
213.16872
Thus, the MIRR = 7.90%, which is less than the required return rate of 8%. The
project should be rejected.
84
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
49. The investor is in lender status during the first year, so use r = .15 . Then
B1 = 100 (1.15 ) 230 = 115 . The investor is now in borrower status during the second
132
year, so use f. Then B2 = 0 = 115 (1 + f ) + 132 and f = 1 = .1478, or 14.78%.
115
52. A withdrawal of W = 1000 would exactly exhaust the fund at i = .03. We now
proceed recursively:
F0 = 1000a10 .03
F1 = F0 (1.04 ) = 1000a10 .03 (1.04 )
1000a10 .03 (1.04 ) 1000 (1.04 )
W1 = =
a10 .03 1.03
1000 (1.04 ) a9 .03
F1 W1 = 1000 (1.04 ) a10 .03 v.03 =
1.03
1000 (1.04 ) a9 .03
2
F2 =
1.03
1000 (1.04 ) a
2
1000 (1.04 )
2
W2 = 9 .03
=
1.03a9 .03 (1.03)2
85
The Theory of Interest - Solutions Manual Chapter 7
Continuing this recursive process 8 more times and reflecting the interest rate change
at time t = 4, we arrive at
54. The accumulation factor for a deposit made at time t evaluated at time n, where
0 t n, is
n n
e t = e t 1+ r = eln 1+ n ln 1+t
r dr dr
( ) ( )
1+ n
= .
1+ t
Then, the accumulated value of all deposits becomes
1+ n n( 1+ n
0 1+ t ) dt = (1 + n ) + n (1 + n ) = ( n + 1) .
2
1
1+ 0 1+ t
86