Sibley Lawsuit Against Portland Public Schools
Sibley Lawsuit Against Portland Public Schools
Sibley Lawsuit Against Portland Public Schools
7
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
8
FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH
9
10 STACEY SIBLEY,
16 (Damages: $772,383)
18
19 Plaintiff alleges:
23 2.
24 Defendant Portland Public Schools ("PPS") is a political subdivision of the State of Oregon and
25 a public body corporate. PPS provides educational services to students in a region confined within
PAGE 1 - COMPLAINT
(503) 228-5027
2 Plaintiff worked for PPS as a Special School principal within the Pioneer Program from 1999
3 through June 2009. The Pioneer Program serves students with severe behavioral problems, including
4 students suffering from a variety of physical, educational and emotional disabilities. Plaintiff supervised
5 the Pioneer Program's expansion from two classes at its inception to a program which included four
6 separate schools which served approximately 470 students each year. During the 2008 - 2009
7 academic year, Plaintiff supervised five Assistant Principals and a staff of approximately 200 people.
8 Plaintiff was responsible for providing a positive and safe educational environment for some of the
11 During the 2008 - 2009 academic year, Plaintiff reported to and was supervised by Joanne
12 Mabbot, Director of Integrated Student Supports for PPS ("Mabbot"). During that academic year,
13 Mabbot began making decisions regarding the staffing and administration of the Pioneer Program
14 which caused Plaintiff to become concerned about student and staff safety at the Pioneer Program
15 schools. When Plaintiff became aware of these decisions by Mabbot, Plaintiff promptly made Mabbot
16 aware of her concerns regarding student and staff safety and the basis for those concerns. Mabbot
17 repeatedly told Plaintiff that she would not take action to address those concerns and that Plaintiff
20 On or about March 10, 2009, Plaintiff and her five assistant principals met with Acting PPS
21 Human Resources Director Jollee Patterson ("Patterson") to express their concerns about Mabbot's
22 decisions and the impact of those decisions on student and staff in the Pioneer Program. On April 3,
23 2009, Plaintiff had a second meeting with Patterson and Assistant Executive Director Michelle Ridell
24 regarding Plaintiff's concerns about Mabbot's decisions and the student and staff safety issues.
25 6.
26 Following Plaintiff's meetings with Patterson, Mabbot became increasingly hostile toward
PAGE 2 - COMPLAINT
(503) 228-5027
1 Plaintiff, excluding her from making decisions regarding the Pioneer Program. Mabbot continued to
2 ignore Plaintiff's concerns about student and staff safety within the Pioneer Program.
3 7.
4 On May 6,2009, Mabbot approached Plaintiff in the public foyer of the Blanchard Education
5 Service Center ("SESC"), the headquarters of PPS. In the presence of other PPS employees, Mabbot
6 grabbed Plaintiff by the shoulders and turned her to face the center of the SESC foyer. In the
7 presence of others employed by PPS, Mabbot told Plaintiff that Plaintiff was no longer necessary to
8 the Pioneer Program and advised Plaintiff that she was being demoted.
9 8.
10 On or about July 1, 2009, Plaintiff was removed from her position as principal of the Pioneer
11 Program and demoted to the position of Program Administrator. During July and August of 2009,
12 Plaintiff was required to report to work at the central office but she was not provided any meaningful
13 job responsibilities to occupy her time. Plaintiff's salary was frozen at the 2008 - 2009 level and
14 Plaintiff was denied the salary increase Mabbot had agreed to at the beginning of the 2008 - 2009
15 academic year. Plaintiff was denied the opportunity to take continuing education classes although
16 other similarly situated Portland Public School employees were permitted to take classes. In August
17 of 2009, Plaintiff was placed on paid leave creating the false impression that she was being disciplined.
18 9.
19 On July 22, 2009, PPS's Senior Financial Analyst Annie Watt sent a defamatory email
20 regarding Plaintiff to several PPS staff. The email falsely stated that Plaintiff had previously misused
22 10.
23 In August of 2009, Plaintiff was assigned to the position of Assistant Principal at Ockley Green
24 Elementary School. Plaintiff served as Assistant Principal of Ockley Green Elementary School
26 1//
PAGE 3 - COMPLAINT
(503) 228-5027
2 In response to Plaintiff's efforts to be placed within PPS as a school principal, Plaintiff was told
3 by PPS Superintendent Carole Smith and Executive Director Ha.nk Harris that in Plaintiff's position as
4 principal of the Pioneer Program, she was not a "real" principal. Since January of 2010, Plaintiff has
5 applied for numerous positions within PPS for which she was qualified by her education and experience
6 as a Special Schools Principal. PPS required her to submit to interviews and testing for those positions
7 when other principals were not required to engage in such a process to verify their skills and abilities
8 as a principal. Plaintiff was denied all of the positions for which she applied and for which she was
9 qualified, and less highly quali'fied individuals were hired into those positions. Plaintiff was denied a
10 transfer to a principal's position although other principals have been granted such transfers.
11 12.
12 On October 29,2009, Plaintiff sent timely tort claims notice to Carole Smith, the Superintendent
14 13.
15 Since January 1 of 2010, the following acts of retaliation have been taken against Plaintiff by
16 PPS:
18 inquiry as to why Plaintiff was no longer with the Pioneer Program, and when the
19 parent asked "did she hurt a child", Sotana responded, "We can't talk about that; we
20 are in litigation";
21 PPS released false information that Plaintiff was difficult and hard to work with which
22 resulted in Plaintiff being denied positions for which she had applied with other
23 school districts;
24 3. PPS described Plaintiff's role as the principal of the Pioneer Program schools by
25 falsely stating that she was a "hybrid" and that she "did not concentrate on
PAGE 4 - COMPLAINT
(503) 228-5027
4. PPS administration denied that Plaintiff was a special school principal; and
2 5. PPS alleged that Plaintiff gave out false diplomas at the Pioneer Program schools.
4 At all material times, Botana, Watt and Mabbot and the PPS employees who engaged in these
5 acts of retaliation were acting in the scope of their employment. PPS is vicariously liable for the
6 conduct of the PPS administrators and employees, including Botana, Watt and Mabbot under the
8 15.
9 On March 10, 2010, Plaintiff and PPS entered into a Tolling Agreement by which PPS agreed
10 that the statute of limitations, or any other defense based on lapse of time was suspended and tolled
11 for the time period March 10, 2010 through and including the expiration date of the Tolling Agreement
12 with respect to any claim or cause of action that might be brought by Plaintiff against PPS related to
14 16.
15 As a result of the Tolling Agreement, the suspension of the Statute of Limitations remained in
16 effect until May 13, 201 0 which was 14 days after Plaintiff gave written notice to PPS of her intent to
17 terminate the suspension and tolling provisions of the Tolling Agreement. The period of March 10,
18 2009 through May 13, 2010 is excluded from all computations of any limitations applicable to the tort
19 claim.
22 17.
24 18.
25 Plaintiff fulfilled her statutory obligation under DRS 654.062(1) by notifying PPS of the violations
26 of laws, regulations, or standards pertaining to safety and health in the place of employment when the
PAGE 5 - COMPLAINT
LAW OFFICES OF JUDY SNYDER
1000 S.W. BROADWAY, SUITE 2400
(503) 228-5027
FAX (503)241-2249
2 19.
3 PPS retaliated against Plaintiff by demoting her from her position as a special schools principal
4 and by engaging in the other acts of retaliation described in paragraphs 6 through 13 above because
5 Plaintiff opposed and complained about practices forbidden by DRS 654.015, in violation of ORS
6 654.062(5).
7 20D
8 As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's wrongful conduct, Plaintiff has suffered
9 economic damages and is entitled to an award of her lost income arising from Defendant's failure to
10 pay Plaintiff at a full principal salary in the amount of $22,383.00, plus prejudgment interest in an
12 21.
13 As a further direct and proximate result of Defendant's wrongful conduct, Plaintiff has been
14 subjected to humiliation and emotional distress entitling her to an award of non-economic damages
18 22D
20 23.
21 PPS retaliated against Plaintiff because Plaintiff disclosed information that Plaintiff reasonably
22 believed was evidence of a violation of federal or state law, rule or regulation by PPS or a substantial
23 and specific danger to public health and safety resulting from an action of PPS, in violation of ORS
24 659A.203.
25 III
26 III
PAGE 6 - COMPLAINT
LAW OFFICES OF JUDY SNYDER
(503) 228-5027
2 (ORS 659A.199)
3 24.
5 25.
6 PPS retaliated against Plaintiff by demoting her from her position as a special schools principal
7 and by engaging in the other acts of retaliation described in paragraph 6 through 13 above because
8 Plaintiff reported information that she believed was evidence of a violation of a state law, rule or
9 regulation.
10 26.
11 Plaintiff is further entitled to her reasonable attorneys fees and costs pursuant to ORS
12 659A.885(3).
14 (Battery)
15 27.
17 28.
19 paragraph 7 above.
20 29.
21 As a direct and proximate result of Mabbot's offensive and unwanted contact, Plaintiff has been
22 subjected to emotional distress and humiliation entitling her to an award of non-economic damages
24 III
25 III
26 III
PAGE 7 - COMPLAINT
(503) 228-5027
6 Mabbot intended to inflict severe emotional distress or knew that severe emotional distress was
10 33.
13 34.
14 As a result of Mabbot's conduct, Plaintiff has sustained emotional distress including mental
15 suffering and mental anguish which has been substantial and enduring.
16 35.
17 As a further direct and proximate result of Defendant's wrongful conduct, Plaintiff is entitled to
21 36.
23 37.
24 By the email sent by Watt, PPS made and published a defamatory statement concerning
25 Plaintiff. The email of July 22, 2009 was false and defamatory per se because it represented that
PAGE 8 - COMPLAINT
(503) 228-5027
2 As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's wrongful conduct, Plaintiff is entitled to non
3 economic damages for the injury to Plaintiff's personal and professional reputation and is further
4 entitled to damages for humiliation, emotional harm and erTlbarrassment, in the amount of
5 $250,000.00.
7 (False Light)
8 39.
10 40.
11 During a Pioneer Program parents meeting, PPS employee Sotana, while acting in the course
12 and scope of his employment, responded to parent questions regarding Plaintiff's absence from the
13 Pioneer Program. A parent commented that Plaintiff must have done something really wrong to not
14 be at the Pioneer Program and asked if Plaintiff had hurt a child. Sotana responded with the
15 statement, "I can't talk about that, we are in litigation" creating the false impression that Plaintiff was
17 41.
18 Sotana's comments regarding Plaintiff were offensive and were made with the knowledge of
19 their falsity or made with reckless disregard as to the falsity of the statements and the false light in
21 420
22 As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's wrongful conduct, Plaintiff is entitled to non
23 economic damages for humiliation, emotional harm and embarrassment, in the amount of $250,000.
24 III
25 III
26 III
PAGE 9 - COMPLAINT
(503) 228-5027
2 43.
26 III
PAGE 10 - COMPLAINT
(503) 228-5027
9 mail: judy@jdsnyder.com
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
PAGE 11 - COMPLAINT
(503) 228-5027