Assessment 2
Assessment 2
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Only standards directly
addressed in Designing Teaching & Learning that are relevant to this assignment have been included. However, this does not
mean the other standards are irrelevant to lesson planning and evaluation more generally.
1.4 Strategies for teaching Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students
N/A In this lesson plan, there is no links to Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander cultures or different
learning needs.
1.5 Differentiate teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the full range of abilities
12345 There is some indication of differentiation strategies for EALD and Low SES students. This shows
insight into knowing the students and how the learn through the participation and scaffolding means
and resources used in the lesson.
Evaluate the lesson plan according to the following NSW Quality Teaching model elements.
Evaluation score refer to NSW QTM Classroom Practice Guide for each element
Comments incl. evidence for evaluation score (2 sentences)
1 Intellectual quality
1.1 Deep knowledge
1 2 3 4 5 There is a basic development of the key ideas of design briefs and what they entice. The lesson is
solely focused on design briefs and aimed towards senior students who should already have prior
knowledge of the key ideas of the lessons topic.
1.5 Metalanguage
1 2 3 4 5 Meta language can be seen in the activities relating to design briefs but is limited. This would need to
be further included especially in the execution of the lesson
2.2 Engagement
12345 The method used to pass information to the students through the presentation and notes can cause a
lack of attentiveness or engagement on the part of the students. however, the activities provide students
the ability to engage with the content.
3 Significance
3.1 Background knowledge
1 2 3 4 5 Prior knowledge of the subject was not addressed in the lesson plan. The lesson may have been
designed to cater to sudents that held no prior knowledge, however this would be uncommon due to
the fact students would be starting HSC subjects
3.4 Inclusivity
12345 Students of different abilities and SES statuses were included and had differentiation strategies to meet
their learning needs.
3.5 Connectedness
1 2 3 4 5 The content may be applied into applications in the real world, and can be seen in the table activity
taken by students that is explained as being identical to the design industry
Identify the two APST standards and two NSW QT model elements you are targeting for improvement.
APST
1) 3.4 Select and use resources 2) 3.3 Use teaching strategies
QT model
1) 1.3 Problematic knowledge 2) 2.2 Engagement
Pre lesson
Cross Curriculum themes & General capabilities Explicit subject specific concepts and skills
- Literacy, the use & understanding of NESA key glossary -Design brief analysis
terms (i.e. elaborate, reflect, evaluate)
How the quality teaching elements you have identified are achieved within the lesson.
2.3 High The use of past student assessment examples as well as providing students with a
Expectations scaffolded assessment task notification demonstrates how the teacher has set high
expectations.
3.3 Knowledge This lesson aims to revise concepts possibly already familiar amongst students with previous
integration experience in the design and technology.
2.2 This lesson aims to engage the students through helping them link the topic to real life
Engagement situations and everyday items they have as well as exploring revision in a fun method
through the ideas of gamification using kahoot.
1.3 Problematic knowledge in this lesson is addressed through providing students with and
Problematic everyday object and breaking it down into a design brief to see how the topic is utilized in a
knowledge
real world application
T/S
0 Pre-students entering classroom Teacher: T
-Class inspection
-Prepare PowerPoint
NOTE Turn on/load all computers ready for students to log -Prepare assessment task
on (reduces time wastage in the lesson for computers to
load) -Prepare assessment task examples
-(Resource) teacher is to display PowerPoint presentation -Ask student to form lines in front of
welcome year 11 design & technology slide 1 ready for class classroom
upon arrival
Student:
-(Resource) teacher is to have the assessment task -Proceed into classroom
notification printed ready for distribution amongst students
Resources:
-(Resource) teacher is to have an assessment task completed
by previous students as an example -computer/s
-internet access
-(Resource) design brief analysis table uploaded onto school -school server
server + hard copy printouts
-projector
-PowerPoint presentation
-Teacher asks students to form two lines at the door of the
classroom. Address students as whole group whereby they -assessment task + example
must enter quietly. -whiteboard + markers
-Teacher is then to immediately mark the roll and do a head -Present teacher introduction
count
-Present subject information
-Reassure students
-3 minute activity, Teacher & Subject introduction, -Prompt students to ask questions
-Time check
-Enter classroom
-Projector/Smart board
-PowerPoint presentation
-Subject information about D&T and what students can -Class roll
expect to learn over the next year.
EAL/D STUDENTS:
-Time check
PLAN B, As a secondary measure the teacher is to email all
student the student a copy of the assessment task -Brainstorm
notification due to the high chance most students will lose -Prompt students to ask questions
the paper form
25 -Time check
-Brainstorm
NOTE Ensure that Teacher whilst reading is addressing the
entire classroom and not just students at the front -Prompt students to ask questions
-Time check
Teacher is to now read through the below headings of the -Students log off
assessment task notification: -Time check
- Due date, make reference to week & day
35 -Design brief, explain this is the core of the assessment & Student:
student should constantly refer back to it at every stage &
decision of the design process -Take notes
EAL/D STUDENTS:
EAL/D STUDENTS:
EAL/D STUDENTS:
Neil A Prasad - 17732433
-Use of visual supports (concept maps) to dissect new
information as opposed to language
EAL/D STUDENTS:
- Students are prompted to recall new information theyve -Overview of next lesson
learn this lesson (assessment task + design brief)
-Reminder of questions
-N/A
-Students are to pack up and leave upon the end of period
signalling.
The need for class activities to reflect clear relevance to the given assessment task, as
well as achieve constant progression in increasing students skill and concept
development.
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with
the standard.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated in this
lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS policy- Outline
the key WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
-Use of Computers for extensive period of time may result in eye strain, therefore
various tasks have been slotted between ICT based activities
-Consult with schools internet policy to ensure internet-based resources are accessible
(not
You must list all references that you have used for the content and resources of this
lesson in this space.
Resources Attached:
You must list all the resources that you have created or found in this space.
The selected lesson plan for the TAS KLA showed a few issues that were addressed in the analysis
of the Quality Teaching Model (QTM) and the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers
(APST) frameworks. The main issues that were addressed in the alteration of the lesson plan were
the use of selected resources, teaching strategies Implemented in the lesson, how students could
address problematic knowledge and how to engage the students more during the body of the lesson.
These issues see improvement through introducing activities that incorporate multiple teaching
strategies and resource selection in order to create a learning experience that engages students.
Even though the original lesson plan had flaws, it had several strong points to in in the
differentiation the lesson accommodates for, the organisation of the information as well as the
teaching supporting student participation and providing student with social support and an inclusive
atmosphere. These areas have been left as they originally were in the lesson plan as they provide
the lesson with good student support and a quality learning environment for the students. The
changes to the lesson plan help to further improve the learning experience for the students through
using the frameworks of quality teaching and the teaching standards.
The Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) provide teachers with three
main domains of standards relating to the way in how teachers conduct their lessons and what
needs to be accounted for in the ways of teaching standards (AITSL, 2011).
The first change made to the lesson is a short five-minute activity using kahoot and the ideas
introduced through the strategies of Gamification and Gardners Multiple Intelligences. These
teaching strategies have the ability to engage students through learning with a different medium
(Brualdi, 1996). The Kahoot quiz is based on the information provided during the start of the lesson
and also touches on knowledge they may have gained in past experiences within the TAS KLA.
The domain of Knowing students and how they learn can be explored through experimenting with
different learning and teaching methods to see how well students engage, participate and achieve in
the classroom (AITSL, 2011). Kahoot quizzes in the classroom can provide the lesson with an
excellent resource that assists students intake of information, new and old knowledge they will
need to draw on in the future through a fun medium that promotes student participation and
engagement with friendly competition (Huang & Soman,2013). Positive Behaviour for Learning
techniques such as positive reinforcement can be used to reach students that are slightly more
distant than other students and provides a chance for those students who may not be so
academically inclined, a learning medium that caters to their own strengths.
Brualdi, A. (1996). Multiple Intelligences: Gardner's Theory. ERIC Digest.. Ericdigests.org. Retrieved 28
September 2017, from https://www.ericdigests.org/1998-1/multiple.htm
Huang, W., & Soman, D. (2013). A Practitioners Guide To Gamification Of Education. semanticscholar.
Retrieved 28 September 2017, from
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c1df/e1970305f257b08a9f2b9844b346452eb869.pdf
NIU. Howard Gardners Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Northern Illinois University. Retrieved 28
September 2017, from
https://www.niu.edu/facdev/_pdf/guide/learning/howard_gardner_theory_multiple_intelligences.pd
f