Environment Impact Assessment
Environment Impact Assessment
Environment Impact Assessment
Although legislation and practice vary around the world, the fundamental
components of an EIA would necessarily involve the following stages:
a. Screening to determine which projects or developments require a full
or partial impact assessment study;
b. Scoping to identify which potential impacts are relevant to assess
(based on legislative requirements, international conventions, expert
knowledge and public involvement), to identify alternative solutions
that avoid, mitigate or compensate adverse impacts on biodiversity
(including the option of not proceeding with the development, finding
alternative designs or sites which avoid the impacts, incorporating
safeguards in the design of the project, or providing compensation for
adverse impacts), and finally to derive terms of reference for the
impact assessment;
c. Assessment and evaluation of impacts and development of
alternatives, to predict and identify the likely environmental impacts of
a proposed project or development, including the detailed elaboration
of alternatives;
d. Reporting the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or EIA
report, including an environmental management plan (EMP), and a
non-technical summary for the general audience.
e. Review of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), based on the
terms of reference (scoping) and public (including authority)
participation.
f. Decision-making on whether to approve the project or not, and under
what conditions; and
g. Monitoring, compliance, enforcement and environmental
auditing. Monitor whether the predicted impacts and proposed
mitigation measures occur as defined in the EMP. Verify the
compliance of proponent with the EMP, to ensure that unpredicted
impacts or failed mitigation measures are identified and addressed in
a timely fashion.
A UNESCO guideline to EIA methodologies-
8. Public participation.
The EIS it shall include a description of the likely significant effect, direct
and indirect, on the environment of the development, explained by
relevance to its possible impact on historical, archaeological, cultural
heritage.
General Introduction
Recommendations
Most of the legal provisions pertain mainly to use/exploitation of
biological resources, rather than their conservation. Even Wild Life
Protection Act 1972, focuses on protection rather than
conservation. Protection under Wild Life Protection Act is largely
directed towards large animal species (charismatic terrestrial
species) rather than the large spectrum of fauna and flora also
found in the marine realm.
The existing laws relating to biodiversity shall be examined in order
to bring them in tune with the provisions of convention to reflect
current understanding of biodiversity conservation. There is a need
for comprehensive legislation on biodiversity conservation and use
especially fisheries policies, which is generally ignored.
Formulation of policies for protection of wetlands, grasslands,
sacred groves, marine flora and fauna and other areas is
significant from the point of view of biodiversity.
Documentation of biodiversity.
Increase allocation of financial resources for conservation of
biodiversity.
Integrating conservation with development.
There should be continuous monitoring of biodiversity use for
review of results of implementation of policies and programmes.