Ecr As-Al Physics 9702 p3 v1

Cambridge International AS and A Level
Physics
9702
Paper 3 Advanced Practical Skills
In order to help us develop the highest quality Curriculum Support resources, we are undertaking a
continuous programme of review; not only to measure the success of our resources but also to
highlight areas for improvement and to identify new development needs.
We invite you to complete our survey by visiting the website below. Your comments on the quality and
relevance of Cambridge Curriculum Support resources are very important to us.
https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/GL6ZNJB
Do you want to become a Cambridge consultant and help us develop support materials?
Please follow the link below to register your interest.
http://www.cie.org.uk/cambridge-for/teachers/teacherconsultants/
Cambridge International Examinations retains the copyright on all its publications. Registered Centres are
permitted to copy material from this booklet for their own internal use. However, we cannot give permission
to Centres to photocopy any material that is acknowledged to a third party even for internal use within a
Centre.
Contents
Contents .............................................................................................................................. 3
Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4
Assessment at a glance ....................................................................................................... 6
Paper 3 Advanced Practical Skills .................................................................................... 8
Question 1 ........................................................................................................................ 8
Question 2 ...................................................................................................................... 22
Introduction
Introduction
The main aim of this booklet is to exemplify standards for those teaching Cambridge International AS &
A Level Physics (9702), and to show how different levels of candidates performance (high, middle and low)
relate to the subjects curriculum and assessment objectives.
In this booklet candidate responses have been chosen to exemplify a range of answers. Each response is
accompanied by a brief commentary explaining the strengths and weaknesses of the answers.
For each question, each response is annotated with a clear explanation of where and why marks were
awarded or omitted. This, in turn, is followed by examiner comments on how the answer could have been
improved. In this way it is possible for you to understand what candidates have done to gain their marks and
what they will have to do to improve their answers. At the end there is a list of common mistakes candidates
made in their answers for each question.
This document provides illustrative examples of candidate work. These help teachers to assess the standard
required to achieve marks, beyond the guidance of the mark scheme. Some question types where the
answer is clear from the mark scheme, such as short answers and multiple choice, have therefore been
omitted.
The questions, mark schemes and pre-release material used here are available to download as a zip file
from Teacher Support as the Example Candidate Responses Files. These files are:
Question Paper 22, June 2016

Question paper 9702_s16_qp_22.pdf
Mark scheme 9702_s16_ms_22.pdf
Past papers, Examiner Reports and other teacher support materials are available on Teacher Support at
https://teachers.cie.org.uk
4 Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702

Introduction
How to use this booklet
Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702 5

Assessment at a glance
Candidates for Advanced Subsidiary (AS) certification take Papers 1, 2 and 3 in a single examination series.
Candidates who, having received AS certification, wish to continue their studies to the full Advanced Level
qualification may carry their AS marks forward and take Papers 4 and 5 in the examination series in which
they require certification.
Candidates taking the full Advanced Level qualification at the end of the course take all five papers in a
single examination series.
Candidates may only enter for the papers in the combinations indicated above.
Candidates may not enter for single papers either on the first occasion or for resit purposes.
All components are externally assessed.
Weighting
Component
AS Level A Level
Paper 1 Multiple Choice 1 hour 15 minutes
This paper consists of 40 multiple choice questions, all with four options. All
questions will be based on the AS Level syllabus content. Candidates will 31% 15.5%
answer all questions.
Candidates will answer on an answer sheet. [40 marks]
Paper 2 AS Level Structured Questions 1 hour 15 minutes
This paper consists of a variable number of questions of variable mark value. All
questions will be based on the AS Level syllabus content. Candidates will 46% 23%
answer all questions.
Candidates will answer on the question paper. [60 marks]
Paper 3 Advanced Practical Skills 2 hours
This paper requires candidates to carry out practical work in timed conditions.
The paper will consist of two experiments drawn from different areas of physics.
The experiments may be based on physics not included in the syllabus content, 23% 11.5%
but candidates will be assessed on their practical skills rather than their
knowledge of theory. Candidates will answer both questions.
Paper 4 A Level Structured Questions 2 hours
This paper consists of a variable number of questions of variable mark value. All
questions will be based on the A Level syllabus but may require knowledge of
38.5%
material first encountered in the AS Level syllabus. Candidates will answer all
questions.

Weighting
Component
AS Level A Level
Paper 5 Planning, Analysis and Evaluation 1 hour 15 minutes
This paper consists of two questions of equal mark value based on the practical
skills of planning, analysis and evaluation. The context of the questions may be
outside the syllabus content, but candidates will be assessed on their practical 11.5%
skills of planning, analysis and evaluation rather than their knowledge of theory.
Candidates will answer both questions.
Teachers are reminded that the latest syllabus is available on our public website at www.cie.org.uk and
Teacher Support at https://teachers.cie.org.uk

Question 1
Example candidate response high Examiner comments
1 The candidate gives y

to the nearest 0.01 cm,
which, although
incorrect, is not
discredited here as the
precision in y looked at
in the table. The
candidate gives a
correct unit and the
value is in range so the
mark is awarded.
Mark for (b) (ii) = 1/1
1 2 Angles are read using

a protractor that can
read to the nearest
degree. 66 and 68
would have been
enough here.
2
Mark for (b) (iii) = 0/1

Example candidate response high, continued Examiner comments

3 The candidate correctly

uses the whole range
of masses available to
them. They use the
correct headings and
corresponding units
separated by a dividing
mark, calculate
correctly and state the
calculated quantity to
the correct number of
3
significant figures.
4 Measurement of y is
made using a ruler with
mm markings so
0.01 cm cannot be
measured. Here 4.5,
5.7, 6.5, 7.2, etc.,
would have sufficed.
4 Mark for (d) = 5/5 + 4/5

= 9/10
5 The candidate has

misread y = 9.4 as
y = 7.2, possibly owing
to careless reading
5 from the table instead
of directly from the
graph.
Mark for (e) (i) = 3/3

Mark for (e) (ii) = 1/1
Mark for (e) (iii) = 1/2

6 Excellent setting out of

6 the graph, plotting and
drawing line of best fit.
The axes are easy to
read, making the
plotting of the points a
relatively easy task.
Line of best fit cannot
be rotated or shifted to
give a better fit.

7 Incorrect read-off has

led to the final answer
for P being out of
range.
Mark for (f) = 1/2
7
Total marks awarded =
16 out of 20
How the candidate could have improved their answer

(b) (iii) The candidates raw value of was given to one decimal place when the protractor can measure to
the nearest degree only. The candidate could have improved by giving the raw angles as 66 and 68.
(d) In tabulating their observations, the candidate correctly used a large range to cover the masses provided,
as stated in the confidential instructions. They correctly stated a unit alongside each heading, separated by a
dividing line (brackets around the units would also have sufficed). The quantity m sin was correctly
calculated to three significant figures. To improve, the candidate should have given the value of y to the
nearest mm, as the ruler cannot measure to any greater degree of precision. So y should have been given
as 4.5 and not 4.50. Notice that this mistake was also made in (b) (ii) but the examiner only discredited this
in one place (in this case, in the table).
(e) (i) The candidate set out and labelled their axes clearly and plotted their points accurately. They placed
their line of best fit so that no rotation or shift was needed to get a better line. The quality of the results was
also very good as all the points lay within a certain distance of the line. If the plots are a long way from the
line, candidates should check over their observations and results and redo them.
(e) (iii) The candidate correctly identified the gradient and y-intercept calculation. Of the six different read-
offs used in these calculations one was misread (7.2 should have been read as 9.4). To improve, the
candidate needed to take greater care and recheck any read-offs taken.
(f) The candidate used the method correctly and the expected value of Q was of the right order of magnitude
with the correct units. Although the units were correct for P, the order of magnitude was too small for that
2 1
expected (2 10 cm g ). This resulted from the incorrect read-off used in the calculation; otherwise the
2 1
candidate would have reached an answer of 1.9 10 cm g .
Mark awarded = (b) (ii) 1/1, (iii) 0/1

Mark awarded = (d) 5/5, 4/5
Mark awarded = (e) (i) 3/3, (ii) 1/1, (iii) 1/2
Mark awarded = (f) 1/2
Total marks awarded = 16 out of 20

Example candidate response middle Examiner comments
1 The angles are given

to the nearest degree
with a unit. The length
measurement y is
given to the millimetre
with the correct unit
and in range.
1

Example candidate response middle, continued Examiner comments
2 2 No units are given on

calculated quantity.
3 The range of masses

used does not extend
over the whole range
supplied.
4 Two or three significant

figures are expected in
3 the calculated quantity.
4
Mark for (d) = 5/5 + 2/5
= 7/10
5 5 The read-off is correct

and is substituted
correctly into the
gradient and y-
intercept calculation.


6
6 The axes are not
labelled and the scale
on the x-axis is
irregular
7 The diameter of the

points plotted is greater
than half a square,
7 especially the third
point up in the y-
direction.
8
8 The line of best fit
could be rotated
clockwise to give a
better fit.
9
9 The position of the
points from the line of
best fit is greater than
that expected for this
experiment and so the
quality mark is not
awarded.

9 No units are included

in the final answer.
Mark for (f) = 1/2

9 12 out of 20

(d) The table was well presented with six y values correctly stated to the nearest mm and the calculation of
m sin is correct. In the table the candidate needed to give a correct unit for the calculated quantity m sin
and to include a separating mark between the heading and the unit. The number of significant figures used
for m sin should have been two or three (instead of the four used).
(e) (i) The candidate could have improved by labelling and setting out regular numerical scales on both axes,
as multiples of 18.7 on the x-axis were too awkward and cumbersome to plot and read off points. The
drawing of points is expected to be done with a sharp pencil so that the points plotted occupy no more than
half a square in either the x or y-direction.
(e) (ii) The drawing of the line of best fit is expected to be done with the use of a sharp pencil and placed so
that the line does not need rotating or shifting to give a better fit.
(f) While the read-offs for the gradient and y-intercept in (e) (iii) were correct, when transferring these
quantities to determine the values of P and Q, the units also needed to be considered.
Mark awarded = (b) (ii) 1/1, (b) (iii) 1/1

Mark awarded = (e) (i) 0/3, (ii) 0/1, (iii) 2 /2

Example candidate response low Examiner comments

Example candidate response low, continued Examiner comments
1 Units of degrees are

1 confused with degrees
centigrade here. No
degrees are expected
in the unit for this
2
2 The range of masses
used does not extend
to that supplied.
3 y stated to 0.1 cm is
correct as the length
can be measured to
the nearest millimetre.
3
Mark for (d) = 5/5 + 2/5
= 7/10
4 4 A correct calculation
gains credit here. Too
many significant
figures are used in the
(Two or three only are
expected, since the
5 angle is given to two
significant figures.)
5 There is a misreading
from the graph here.
However, since one set
of read-offs is correct
in the gradient
calculation, an error
carried forward mark is
allowed.


6 Correctly labelled axes

and set-out scales
here. The plotted point
has been placed at
y = 4.8 instead of
y = 4.9. This plot is
circled, therefore it has
been treated as an
anomalous point and
ignored for the line of
best fit mark. Despite
6 this, the line needed to
be rotated
anticlockwise to give a
better fit on the
remaining points.

7 A substitution method
is used to find P and Q
when the gradient and
y-intercept were
required. Also, the
candidate does not use
the correct
corresponding units.
Mark for (f) = 0/2
7 Total marks awarded =

11 out of 20

(d) The candidate could have extended their range to include m = 400 g showing that all the masses
available had been used. The units for m sin should have been stated solely as g and without the symbol,
as sin is a ratio, and without units. This candidate confused with C, a unit of temperature which does not
relate to angles. The calculated quantity should have been given as two or three significant figures (not four)
as is stated to two significant figures.
(e) (i) The candidate could have improved by taking greater care in accurately plotting their points (y = 4.8
should have been plotted at y = 4.9) and subsequently checking them.
(e) (ii) The line of best fit should have been rotated clockwise to give a better fit, especially since the third
point was circled (hence identified as anomalous) and discounted in judging where to place the line.
(e) (iii) When determining the gradient, the candidate read one of the read-offs incorrectly, so they should
have taken greater care and checked that any read-offs were within half a square.
(f) When determining the values of P and Q, consideration of the method and units was needed. The
candidate needed to use the y-intercept value for determining Q, as stated in the question, and not use a
substitution method.
Mark awarded = (b) (ii) 1/1, (b) (iii) 1/1

Mark awarded = (e) (i) 1/3, (ii) 0/1, (iii) 1/2

Common mistakes candidates made in this question

(b) (iii) Stating the measurements to a greater degree of precision than the measuring instrument.
(e) (i) Not setting out the graph scales in a logical, regular order, which led to incorrect plotting and read-offs.
(e) (ii) Drawing the line so that a better fit could be achieved by further rotation or shifting.
(e) (iii) Incorrectly reading the points to be plotted or read off for the gradient calculation.
(f) & (d) Not considering the unit of the final quantity or calculated quantities.

Question 2
Example candidate response high Examiner comments
1 The diameter is
measured correctly to
the nearest 0.01 mm,
which is as expected
from reading a manual
micrometer screw
gauge. Similarly, length
L in (b) (iii) is
measured correctly to
1 mm, which is
expected from using a
ruler with millimetre
markings. The area is
calculated correctly, as
is C in (c) (i).
1
Mark for (a) (ii) = 1/1
Mark for (a) (iii) = 1/1

2 Consideration of the
inherent difficulties of
the experiment in
taking the
measurement L is not
2 factored into working
out the uncertainty in L.

Mark for (b) (iv) = 0/1

3 Significant figures in C
need to relate to all raw
readings (d and L).
3 Mark for (c) (i) = 1/1
Mark for (c) (ii) = 0/1
4 Repeated values of
several oscillations, a
unit and the final
working out of the
period ensure the mark
4 here.
Mark for (d) (ii) = 1/1


5 A percentage
difference, a criterion
and an opinion based
on a comparison
5 ensure that full marks
are awarded here.
Mark for (f) (i) = 1/1

Mark for (f) (ii) = 1/1

6 An excellent synopsis
of possible problems
and corresponding
improvements. Point
two (improvements) is
not awarded credit as
adhesive tape is not
considered to be
effective here.
Mark for (g) (i) = 4/4

Mark for (g) (ii) = 3/4
6 Total marks awarded =

17 out of 20

(b) (iv) The candidate could have improved their answer by considering the uncertainty as the smallest
division, not taking into account the fact that there are inherent difficulties with taking the measurement
(getting the ruler close owing to the fact that the clip and the hanger are in the way). These difficulties should
be factored in, despite the measurement being a static one.
(c) (ii) In justifying the number of significant figures used in C, the candidate could have improved by
referring to the number of significant figures used in the raw values of both d and L used ultimately to
calculate C.
(g) (i) & (ii) Although the candidate scored very highly in the descriptive evaluation section at the end, they
could have improved by stating that the wire that slips from the clip could be glued to the clip. Their
suggestion (use of adhesive tape) would still allow the wire to slip in this particular case.
Mark awarded = (a) (ii) 1/1, (iii) 1/1

Mark awarded = (b) (iii) 1/1, (iv) 0/1
Mark awarded = (c) (i) 1/1, (ii) 0/1
Mark awarded = (d) (ii) 1/1
Mark awarded = (e) (ii) 3/3
Mark awarded = (f) (i) 1/1, (ii) 1/1
Mark awarded = (g) (i) 4/4, (ii) 3/4

Example candidate response middle Examiner comments
1 The diameter is
correctly stated to the
nearest 0.01 mm, in
keeping with the
precision of the
micrometer screw
gauge. Correct
calculation of the area.

1 Mark for (a) (iii) = 1/1

2 Correct consideration
is given to the smallest
reading of 1 mm and
the inherent difficulty in
placing the ruler close
is also factored in to
2 give an uncertainty in
the length of 2 mm.


3 The number of
significant figures used
in C needs to relate to
the raw readings used
(d and L here).
3 Mark for (c) (i) = 1/1



4
4 This has been
rearranged incorrectly
(k = T/C).
5 Although the candidate

identifies a percentage
difference and a
criterion and gives an
opinion, there is no
justification of why the
criterion should be as
high as 30% for this
particular experiment.
5 Mark for (f) (ii) = 0/1

6 A really good synopsis

of the problems
encountered.
However, in the
improvements, greater
detail is needed to
explain how the
equipment is used
(points 2 and 4).


13 out of 20


(c) (ii) The candidate justified the number of significant figures used in C by relating them to that used in L
and A. To improve, the candidate also needed to consider the raw value used to calculate A, (that is d).
(f) (i) In calculating k the candidate could have improved by rearranging the equation correctly (k = C/T).
(f) (ii) When explaining whether the results support the relationship, the candidate calculated a percentage
difference, stated a criterion and gave an opinion. However, the stated criterion was judged to be too high for
this experiment; the candidate needed to state where the idea of 30% came from.
(g) (ii) The candidate scored highly on describing the limitations. To improve, the candidate could have
explained the improvements in greater depth, for example, using a video camera with a timer (in shot) to
record the period. Although credit was awarded to the fact that there is more than one plane of motion going
on, turning off the fans was not considered to be a major factor, as the mass and the wire are compact,
compared to using a table tennis ball for example. The thinness of the wire and therefore the likelihood of it
breaking when constantly loaded into the clip were not considered creditworthy, nor was the idea of using a
cork and a small ball of clay, as there was no detailed explanation of how these could be used to secure the
wire.


Example candidate response low Examiner comments
1 There is a diameter
1 misreading from the
micrometer screw
gauge here.
Mark for (a) (iii) = 1/1

2 There is consideration
of uncertainty equal to
the smallest division of
the length
measurement here, but
no factoring in of the
difficulty of actually
taking the
measurement. It is
difficult to bring the
ruler up close because
2 the clip is in the way.


3
3 Correct calculation of C
(and A in (a) (iii))
despite missing out the
units in this case.
Mark for (c) (i) = 1/1
4 The number of
significant figures used
4 needs to relate to the
raw data used (d and L).
5 Repeats in the time

5 taken, calculation of
the period and period
in range.

6 Second values of
length and period
provided, with an
expected trend given
that the longer length is
used here.
6 Mark for (e) (ii) = 3/3

7 No consideration of the
percentage difference
or a criterion to
compare the
7 percentage difference
with.
Mark for (f) (ii) = 0/1

8 The problems listed

8 are vague and do not
show how they might
affect any
measurements.
9 Two good solutions are

9
identified here. The
other two are too
vague.

11 out of 20


(a) (ii) To improve in measuring the diameter of the wire, the candidate needed to have done more practice
in reading the micrometer screw gauge accurately, as they gave a value of 0.03 mm when the supervisor
gave 0.26 mm.
(b) (iv) To improve in estimating the percentage uncertainty in L, the candidate should have thought about
the difficulties in measuring L and factored these into the uncertainty in L so that they did not just consider
the smallest possible reading from the ruler in this particular case.
(c) (ii) To improve in justifying the number of significant figures used in their value of C, reference should
also have been made to the number of significant figures used in d.
(f) (ii) To improve the explanation of whether the results supported the relationship, the candidate should
have worked out the percentage difference and compared this to a criterion, then formulated an opinion.
(g) (i) & (ii) The candidate could have described real problems and solutions in greater detail and linked the
problems to specific quantities. For example, the candidate stated error in seeing the oscillation. Here the
examiner would expect the candidate to relate this either to the oscillation being in more than one plane or to
the fact that the end of an oscillation is difficult to judge, thereby affecting the period.

Common mistakes candidates made in this question

(a) (ii) Misreading measuring devices such as the micrometer screw gauge.
(b) (iv) Estimating the uncertainty as equal to the smallest division of the ruler (1 mm). Candidates needed to
factor in the inherent difficulties of the experiment (getting the ruler close to the wire owing to the clip being in
the way), leading to a larger uncertainty in the length reading.
(c) (ii) When justifying the significant figures used in C, candidates often referred to the significant figures
used in area A, which were not a raw value but an intermediate calculated value.
(g) (i) & (ii) Descriptions of problems and solutions were often too vague and not specific to a particular
measurement.

Cambridge International Examinations
1 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB1 2EU, United Kingdom
t: +44 1223 553554 f: +44 1223 553558
e: info@cie.org.uk www.cie.org.uk
Cambridge International Examinations 2017

Version 1.0

Ecr As-Al Physics 9702 p3 v1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ecr As-Al Physics 9702 p3 v1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ecr As-Al Physics 9702 p3 v1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cambridge International AS and A Level

Please follow the link below to register your interest.

Assessment at a glance ....................................................................................................... 6

Paper 3 Advanced Practical Skills .................................................................................... 8

Question Paper 22, June 2016

4 Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702

How to use this booklet

Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702 5

All components are externally assessed.

Paper 1 Multiple Choice 1 hour 15 minutes

Candidates will answer on an answer sheet. [40 marks]

Paper 2 AS Level Structured Questions 1 hour 15 minutes

Candidates will answer on the question paper. [60 marks]

Paper 3 Advanced Practical Skills 2 hours

Candidates will answer on the question paper. [40 marks]

Paper 4 A Level Structured Questions 2 hours

Candidates will answer on the question paper. [100 marks]

6 Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702

Paper 5 Planning, Analysis and Evaluation 1 hour 15 minutes

Candidates will answer on the question paper. [30 marks]

Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702 7

Paper 3 Advanced Practical Skills

Example candidate response high Examiner comments

1 The candidate gives y

Mark for (b) (ii) = 1/1

1 2 Angles are read using

8 Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702

Example candidate response high, continued Examiner comments

Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702 9

Example candidate response high, continued Examiner comments

3 The candidate correctly

4 Mark for (d) = 5/5 + 4/5

5 The candidate has

Mark for (e) (i) = 3/3

10 Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702

Example candidate response high, continued Examiner comments

6 Excellent setting out of

Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702 11

Example candidate response high, continued Examiner comments

7 Incorrect read-off has

Mark for (f) = 1/2

How the candidate could have improved their answer

Mark awarded = (b) (ii) 1/1, (iii) 0/1

Total marks awarded = 16 out of 20

12 Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702

Example candidate response middle Examiner comments

1 The angles are given

Mark for (b) (iii) = 0/1

Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702 13

Example candidate response middle, continued Examiner comments

2 2 No units are given on

3 The range of masses

4 Two or three significant

5 5 The read-off is correct

Mark for (e) (i) = 0/3

14 Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702

Example candidate response middle, continued Examiner comments

7 The diameter of the

Cambridge International AS and A Level Physics 9702 15