IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM)

e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 13, Issue 5 (Sep. - Oct. 2013), PP 65-69
www.iosrjournals.org

Ratio Analysis used to compare the performance of Tata steel and

Jindal Steel. (A comparative study)
*Manish Roy Tirkey & ** Mustafa Osamah
*Asst. professor **M.Com Financial Accountacy Student
*Sam Higginbottom institute of agriculture Technology and Sciences, Allahabad
**University of Misan, Misan IRAQ

Abstract: This study is conducted purely based on secondary data obtained through website of the specified
private banks. By using the ratio analysis tool we can analyse the performance of both the steel industry of India
and we can easily find out the strength and weakness of the companies and their position in the market.
Different ratios are used in this study and particularly those which are related to the financial statement for this
purpose balance sheet of 2009-2012 of both the banks are used and from them ratios are calculated so
according to which we can easily compare the banks performance and tell which private banks grow faster and
whose position is better than the other one. After comparing the financial position it is clear that position of
Tata steels is much better than the Jindal steels.
Keywords: Balance sheet, Companies, Ratio analysis, Steel Companies.

I. Introduction
Ratio analysis is such a significant technique for financial analysis. It indicates relation of two
mathematical expressions and the relationship between two or more things. Financial ratio is a ratio of selected
values on an enterprise's financial statement.
There are many standard ratios used to evaluate the overall financial condition of a corporation or other
organization. Financial ratios are used by managers within a firm, by current and potential stockholders of a
firm, and by a firms creditor. Financial analysts use financial ratios to compare the strengths and weaknesses in
various companies.

Essence of ratio analysis:

Financial ratio analysis helps us to understand how profitable a business is, if it has enough money to pay debts
and we can even tell whether its shareholders could be happy or not.
Financial ratios allow for comparisons:
1. between companies
2. between industries
3. between different time periods for one company
4. between a single company and its industry average
To evaluate the performance of one firm, its current ratios will be compared with its past ratios. When
financial ratios over a period of time are compared, it is called time series or trend analysis. It gives an
indication of changes and reflects whether the firms financial performance has improved or deteriorated or
remained the same over that period of time. It is not the simply changes that has to be determined, but more
importantly it must be recognized that why those ratios have changed. Because those changes might be result of
changes in the accounting polices without material change in the firms performances.
Another method is to compare ratios of one firm with another firm in the same industry at the same
point in time. This comparison is known as the cross sectional analysis. It might be more useful to select some
competitors which have similar operations and compare their ratios with the firms. This comparison shows the
relative financial position and performance of the firm. Since it is so easy to find the financial statements of
similar firms through publications or Medias this type of analysis can be performed so easily.
To determine the financial condition and performance of a firm, its ratios may be compared with
average ratios of the industry to which the firm belongs. This method is known as the industry analysis that
helps to ascertain the financial standing and capability of the firm in the industry to which it belongs.
Industry ratios are important standards in view of the fact that each industry has its own characteristics,
which influence the financial and operating relationships. But there are certain practical difficulties for this
method. First finding average ratios for the industries is such a headache and difficult. Second, industries
include companies of weak and strong so the averages include them also. Sometimes spread may be so wide that
the average may be little utility. Third, the average may be meaningless and the comparison not possible if the
firms with in the same industry widely differ in their accounting policies and practices. However if it can be

www.iosrjournals.org 65 | Page
Ratio Analysis used to compare the performance of Tata steel and Jindal Steel. (A comparative study)

standardized and extremely strong and extremely weak firms be eliminated then the industry ratios will be very
useful.

Objectives of the study

1. To study the financial performance of Tata steel and Jindal steel.
2. To compare the financial performance of Tata steel and Jindal steel.

II. Research Methodology

In this present study, an attempt has been made to evaluate and compare the financial performance of
Tata steel and Jindal steel and both of the companies are related with the private sector. The study is based on
secondary data and the details are collected through websites, magazines and journals. The time period of study
is four years 2009 to 2012. Ratio analysis was applied to analyse the performance of these companies.

Following Ratios are used for this Study.

1. Current Ratio.
2. Debt equity ratio.
3. Inventory turnover ratio.
4. Fixed asset turnover ratio.
5. Net operating profit per share.
6. Return on capital employed.
7. Dividend payout ratio.
8. Earnings per share.

DATA ANLYSIS
1. Current ratio
Particulars 2009 2010 2011 2012
Tata steels .91 1.12 1.78 .79
Jindal steels 1.04 .65 .79 .69
Source : Dion Global Solutions Limited
2
1.5
Tata steels Jindal
1 steels
0.5 Series 2
0
2009 2010 2011 2012

From the above graph and table it is clear that Current ratio of Tata steel increasing from 2009 to 2011 but fall
down in 2012 and it is highest in the year 2011 on the other hand the current ratio of Jindal steels fluctuating
from 2009 to 2012. It indicates the companys ability to meet the short term debts.

2. Debt Equity ratio.

Particulars 2009 2010 2011 2012
Tata steels 1.34 .68 .59 .45
Jindal steels .92 1.24 1.39 1.33
Source: Dion Global Solutions Limited
1.5

1
Tata steels
0.5 Jindal steels

0
2009 2010 2011 2012

www.iosrjournals.org 66 | Page
Ratio Analysis used to compare the performance of Tata steel and Jindal Steel. (A comparative study)

From the above table it is clear that the debt equity ratio of Tata steels goes downward from 2009 to 2012 while
the Jindal steels debt equity ratio increase in two year and then slightly reduced in 2012. Debt-to-equity
ratio (D/E) indicating the relative proportion of shareholders' equity and debt used to finance a company's assets.

3. Inventory Turnover ratio.

Particulars 2009 2010 2011 2012
Tata steels 9.36 10.90 9.85 9.40
Jindal steels 9.08 8.05 5.81 4.83
Source: Dion Global Solutions Limited
12
10
8
6 Tata steels
4
jindal steels
2
0
2009 2010 2011 2012

From the above graph and table it is clear that Inventory turnover ratio of Tata steels is high in comparison to
Jindal steels it shows the companys efficiency in turning its inventory into sales. A low turnover rate indicates
poor liquidity. Here Jindal steel performance is not good in comparison to Tata steels.

4. Fixed asset turnover ratio.

Particulars 2009 2010 2011 2012
Tata steels 1.22 1.12 1.29 1.48
Jindal steels 1.04 .83 .75 .88
Source: Dion Global Solutions Limited
2

1.5

1 Tata steels
0.5 jindal steels

0
2009 2010 2011 2012

From the above table and graph it is clear that the ratio of Tata steels were high in the year 2009, 2011 and 2012.
Jindal steels ratio was high in the year 2009 and 2012.it shows that Tata steels has been more effective in using
the investment in fixed assets to generate revenues.

5. Net operating profit per share.

Particulars 2009 2010 2011 2012
Tata steels 333.27 281.11 305.53 348.41
Jindal steels 496.46 78.90 102.15 142.13
Source: Dion Global Solutions Limited
600
500
400
300 Tata steels
200 jindal steels
100
0
2009 2010 2011 2012

www.iosrjournals.org 67 | Page
Ratio Analysis used to compare the performance of Tata steel and Jindal Steel. (A comparative study)

From the above table and graph it is clear that net operating profit per share of Tata steels is consistently
good in 2009-2012 while Jindal steels net operating profit was high in 2009.

6. Return on capital employed

Particulars 2009 2010 2011 2012
Tata steels 15.01 13.06 13.48 15.03
Jindal steels 23.16 14.86 15.67 13.40
Source: Dion Global Solutions Limited
25
20
15
Tata steels
10
5 Jindal steels
0
2009 2010 2011 2012

From the above table and graph we are able to tell that which companies return on investment is better in
2009 Jindal steels return on capital is better in 2010 it goes down while in Tata steels return on capital
employed fluctuates in these four years it were high in 2009 and 2012 while low in 2010 and 2011.

7. Dividend payout ratio net profit.

Particulars 2009 2010 2011 2012
Tata steels 27.15 16.64 19.04 20.11
Jindal steels 5.55 8.16 6.97 7.23
Source: Dion Global Solutions Limited
30
25
20
15 Tata steels
10
Jindal steels
5
0
2009 2010 2011 2012

This ratio identifies the percentage of earnings (net income) per common share allocated to paying cash
dividends to shareholders. From the above table it is clear that Dividend payout ratio of Tata steels were
high in all the years in comparison to Jindal steels which has low dividend payout ratio.

8. Earnings per share.

Particulars 2009 2010 2011 2012
Tata steels 69.70 56.37 71.58 68.95
Jindal steels 99.35 15.89 22.09 22.58
Source: Dion Global Solutions Limited
120
100
80
60 Tata steels
40 Jindal steels
20
0
2009 2010 2011 2012

www.iosrjournals.org 68 | Page
 Ratio Analysis used to compare the performance of Tata steel and Jindal Steel. (A comparative study)

From the above table and graph it is clear that earnings per share of Tata steels were better in all these years
2009-2012. While in Jindal steels it performance was good in 2009 but in 2010,2011 and 2012 it goes
down.

III. Conclusion
After analysing the above ratio it is clear that the position of Tata steels is better in comparison to
Jindal steels. In above 8 ratio which we see through graph and table it is shown that in 6 ratio Tata steel
company is performing better while the position of Jindal steels is good but in comparison to Tata steels position
was not good.

References
[1]. Alexander, D., Britton, A., Jorissen, A. (2007) International Financial Reporting and Analysis, 3rd edition. London: Thomson
Learning.
[2]. European Commission (2008) Final Report of the Expert Group Accounting Systems for Small Enterprises Recommendations and
Good Practices. European Commission Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General.
[3]. Eurostat (2011) Key gures on European business with a special feature on SMEs. Dostuno na:
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-ET-11- 001/EN/KSET-11-001-EN.PDF (10-01-2012)
[4]. FINA (2011) Poslovanje malog poduzetnitva u 2009. i 2010. godini. Zagreb: Financijska agencija.
[5]. Gibson, C. H. (2011) Financial Statement Analysis, 12th Edition. Canada: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
[6]. Halabi, A. K., Barrett, R., Dyt, R. (2010) Understanding Financial Information Used to Assess Small Firm Performance. Qualitative
Research in Accounting & Management, 7 (2), pp 163-179
[7]. HGK (2010) Malo gospodarstvo. Hrvatska gospodarska komora; Sektor za industriju. Dostupno
na:http://www2.hgk.hr/en/depts/industry/Malo_gospodarstvo_2010.pdf(14-01-2012)
[8]. IFAC (2011) Small and medium-sized enterprises have been recognized as a separate but very important economic discipline
Practice Management Tips for SMPs. IFAC: Small and Medium Practices Committee.
[9]. Osteryoung, J., Constand, R., Nast, D. (1992) Financial Ratios in Large Public and Small Private Firms. Journal of Small Business
Management, 30 (3), pp 35-46
[10]. Sever, S. (2007) Uloga nancijskih i nenancijskih pokazatelja u revizorovoj ocjeni kvalitete poslovanja. Magistarski rad. Zagreb:
Ekonomski fakultet.
[11]. Thomas, J., Evanson, R. V. (1987) An Empirical Investigation of Association Between Financial Ratio Use and Small Business
Success. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 14(4), pp 555-571
[12]. VSBDC (2004) Financial Statement Analysis for Small Businesses; A Resource Guide. Virginia Small Business Development
Center Network.
[13]. www.moneycontrol.com

www.iosrjournals.org 69 | Page