Adb WaterDistrictDevtProj Phil Psi Apro May2010
Adb WaterDistrictDevtProj Phil Psi Apro May2010
Adb WaterDistrictDevtProj Phil Psi Apro May2010
The proposed Water District Development Sector Project (WDDSP), a US$50-million loan for approval
by Asian Development Bank (ADB) in November 2010, aims to assist the Philippine Government in its
effort to improve water supply and sanitation services for the urban population outside Metro Manila,
and to achieve the related Millennium Development Goal (MDG) targets. The project will support the
institutional development of Local Water Utilities Administration (LWUA) and contribute to water sector
reform. The project will also provide assistance to LWUA to implement pilot projects for sanitation and
support capacity-building for water districts. ADB approved a US$1.2 million project preparatory
technical assistance (PPTA) in September 2008; the PPTA report has yet to be posted on the ADB
website. Since 1975, ADB has supported the Philippine water sector by approving five loan projects for
LWUA for a total amount of US$178 million.
Background. Water districts are local government- (ii) institutional fragmentation, and (iii) lack of public
owned and -controlled corporate entities that awareness and willingness to pay for sanitation.
provide water supply and sanitation services within
their areas of responsibility, which may include one WDDSP pilot water districts. These include:
or more cities and municipalities. The majority (i) Metro La Union Water District; (ii) Quezon
(about 67%) of a total 500 water districts are Metro Water District; (iii) Legazpi City Water
classified as small, while only about 3% are Districte; (iv) Leyte Metro Water District;
categorized as large, and about 1% as very large. (v) Koronadal City Water District. Criteria for water
LWUA provides water districts with financial and district selection was based on (i) demand for
technical assistance, and serves as their regulator. improved water supply and sanitation; (ii) fiscal
LWUA has established itself as the dominant lender capacity, financial management, commitment to
to the sector, focusing primarily on the larger and reform, and governance; (iii) focus on serving low-
more viable water districts. As a result, smaller water income communities; (iv) well-defined investment
districts serving poorer areas of the country have had needs; and (v) project preparedness.
much less access to LWUA funding and have not
been able to enhance service coverage and quality. In TOR of PPTA consultants. The objective of the
2004, Executive Order (EO) 279 was approved to PPTA is to design the WDDSP following a
provide for comprehensive reform of the financing consultative process. The consultants are tasked with
policies of the water supply sector and to streamline the following:
LWUAs organizational structure. EO 279 mandates
that LWUA focus its lending operations and Develop and recommend mechanisms for public
assistance on less creditworthy water districts, with consultation and community participation in
the aim of graduating them to creditworthy status. project planning; operation and maintenance;
Creditworthy water districts are expected to access project implementation and management,
the commercial financial market for funding. particularly in relation to levels of service
performance; tariffs; and environmental protection.
Main issues for water districts. Issues identified are: Assess whether there is a role for NGOs in project
(i) the high number of small utilities with low activities.
efficiency, (ii) lack of capacity for project
development and implementation, (iii) low service Carry out public consultations that include NGOs.
quality (e.g., interrupted supply, uncertain water
quality, high level of nonrevenue water, low pressure, Hold discussions with LWUA, water districts,
low coverage), (iv) need to enhance financial related government agencies, consumer groups,
performance, and (v) major investment needed for and other stakeholders to identify key issues and
infrastructure expansion and rehabilitation. While obtain their views on capacity building needs.
water districts are also mandated to provide
sanitation in their service areas, there are only a few Develop a capacity building program, outline
examples where this is practiced; this is mainly due training programs and recommended interventions,
to (i) lack of cost recovery for sanitation, and estimate related costs.