Mong Project Outline
Mong Project Outline
Mong Project Outline
1.0 Introduction:
2.0 Classical Approach
2.1 Definition :
Textbook 1:
The Gilbreths also experimented with the design and use the proper
tools and equipment optimizing work performance.
Textbook 1:
The evolution of modern management began in the closing decades
of th 19th century, after the industrial revolution had swept through
Europe and America.
Nearly 200 years before Adam Smith had been one of the first
writers to investigate the advantages associated with producing
goods and in services in factories.
Taylor believed that if the amount of time and effort that each
worker expends to produce a unit of output (a finished good or
service) can be reduced by increasing specialization and the
division of labor, the production process will become more
efficient.
Principle 1: Study the way workers perform their tasks, gather all
the informal job knowledge that workers possess, and experiment
with ways of improving how tasks are performed
It produces the huge cost savings and dramatic output increases that
occur in large organized work settings.
(Daft, 2012)
Textbook 3:
In the last half of the nineteenth century, organizations were unable
to obtain increased productivity from employees despite making
large investment in new technologies.
At Midvale, Taylor carefully documented the large amount of time
that was wasted by workers who were ill equipped and poorly
trained to perform the simple tasks.
Complicating the situation, there were no systematic rules to serve
as guidelines for doing the jobs most efficiently.
Workers learned their jobs by the use of rules of thumbs and
trial-and-error processes.
In response to the inefficiencies he observed in the steel industry,
Taylor developed scientific management, which is summarized in
Table 1.2
The scientific method should be applied to determining the one best
way to do a particular job.
This optimal approach to work spares the worker from management
criticism and provides managers and owners with the most output
from each worker.
Next, Taylor supported the use of scientific selection methods to
make the best matches between workers and jobs.
Taylor found this approach inefficient, and he suggested using
measure of workers aptitudes,traits, and performance to
scientifically determine the fit between person and job.
Finally, Taylor perceived a clear separation between the work of
employees and managers.
In Taylor’s view, employees did the physical work and managers
planned, directed and coordinated employees’ efforts so that the
goals would be reached.
In one of the most famous applications, Henry Ford utilized
scientific management in the production process of the factury that
manufactured the Model-T Ford .
The lasting contribution of scientific management was to transform
management into a more objective, systematic body of knowledge
in which best practices can be discovered for different jobs.
Scientific management had a shortcomings.
It did not appreciate the social context of work and the needs
(beyond pay) of workers.
It often led to dehumanizing working conditions in which every
aspect of a worker’s effort was measured, prohibiting employees
initiative.
Scientific management also assumed that workers had no useful
ideas, and that only managers and experts were capable of coming
up with the good ideas or innovations.
(Gomez-Meija, Balkin, Cardy, 2015)
Example from textbook (Robbins 2016)
Th owners thought Schultz’s style and high energy would clash
with the existing culture.
But Schultz was quite persuasive and was able to allay the owners’
fears.
They asked him to join the company as director of retail operations
and marketing, which he enthusiastically did.
Schultz’s passion for the coffee business was obvious.
Although some of the company employees resented the fact that he
was an ‘outsider,” Schultz had found his niche and he had lots of
idea for the company.
As he says, “I wanted to make a positive impact.”
Example from the internet :
Starbucks uses scientific management principles to create a
welcoming environment for partners.
The first principle that Starbucks use is the specialized selecting
and training of workers.
Starbucks has a Rotational Development Program to provide the
knowledge and professional skills for the first entry at Starbucks.
It based at Corporate Headquarters in Seattle, and it is two-year
program consisting of three, eight months rotations in various areas
within a specific business unit.
The program is aim to develop strong and successful leaders for
growing business. Then, looking into the single unit, each worker
has their own responsibility in the production line of coffee and
food.
To provide the best service to the customers consistently, there are
many specialized requirements for Café lead and cook.
They should have at least one-year certificate from college or
technical school, or six month to one year related experience and
training.
The proficient of using food service equipment with Food Handlers
Card is also the required ability for all the cooking staffs.
Each individual must perform each responsibility satisfactorily to
achieve a common success in the customer service.
3.1 Definition :
The field of study that researches the actions (behaviour) of people
at work is called organizational behavior (OB)
Much of what managers do today when managing people-
motivating, leading, building trust, working with a team, managing
conflict, and so forth-has comeout of OB research.
Four stand out as early advocates of the OB approach : Robert
Owen, Hugo Munsterberg, Mary Parker Follett, and Chester
Barnard.
their contributors were varied and distinct, yet all believed that
people were the most important asset of the organization and should
be managed accordingly.
Their ideas provided the foundation for such management practises
as employee selection procedures, motivation programs, and work
teams.
Textbook 1 :
Although their writings were different, these theorists all espoused a
theme that focused on behavioral management , the study of how
managers should personally behave to motivate employees and
encourage them to perform at high levels and be committed to
achieving organizational goals.
If F. W. Taylor is considered the father of management thought,
Mary Parker Follett (1868–1933) serves as its mother. Much of her
writing about management and about the way managers should
behave toward workers was a response to her concern that Taylor
was ignoring the human side of the organization.
She pointed out that management often overlooks the multitude of
ways in which employees can contribute to the organization when
managers allow them to participate and exercise initiative in their
everyday work lives.
Follett proposed that “authority should go with knowledge . . .
whether it is up the line or down.”
In other words, if workers have the relevant knowledge, then
workers, rather than managers, should be in control of the work
process itself, and managers should behave as coaches and
facilitators—not as monitors and supervisors.
In making this statement, Follett anticipated the current interest in
self-managed teams and empowerment.
She also recognized the importance of having managers in different
departments communicate directly with each other to speed
decision making.
She advocated what she called “cross-functioning”: members of
different departments working together in cross-departmental teams
to accomplish projects—an approach that is increasingly used
today.
Fayol also mentioned expertise and knowledge as important sources
of managers’ authority, but Follett went further.
She proposed that knowledge and expertise, and not managers’
formal authority deriving from their position in the hierarchy,
should decide who will lead at any particular moment.
Follett took a horizontal view of power and authority, in contrast to
Fayol, who saw the formal line of authority and vertical chain of
command as being most essential to effective management.
Follett’s behavioral approach to management was very radical for
its time.
To increase efficiency, they studied ways to improve various
characteristics of the work setting, such as job specialization or the
kinds of tools workers used.
d. One series of studies was conducted from 1924 to 1932 at the
Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Company.
This research, now known as the Hawthorne studies, began as an
attempt to investigate how characteristics of the work
setting—specifically the level of lighting or illumination— affect
worker fatigue and performance.
The researchers conducted an experiment in which they
systematically measured worker productivity at various levels of
illumination.
The experiment produced some unexpected results.
The researchers found that regardless of whether they raised or
lowered the level of illumination, productivity increased.
In fact, productivity began to fall only when the level of
illumination dropped to the level of moonlight—a level at which
workers could presumably no longer see well enough to do their
work efficiently.
The researchers found these results puzzling and invited a noted
Harvard psychologist, Elton Mayo, to help them.
Mayo proposed another series of experiments to solve the mystery.
These experiments, known as the relay assembly test experiments,
were designed to investigate the effects of other aspects of the work
context on job performance, such as the effect of the number and
length of rest periods and hours of work on fatigue and monotony.
The goal was to raise productivity.
During a two-year study of a small group of female workers, the
researchers again observed that productivity increased over time,
but the increases could not be solely attributed to the effects of
changes in the work setting.
Gradually the researchers discovered that, to some degree, the
results they were obtaining were influenced by the fact that the
researchers themselves had become part of the experiment
In other words, the presence of the researchers was affecting the
results because the workers enjoyed receiving attention and being
the subject of study and were willing to cooperate with the
researchers to produce the results they believed the researchers
desired.
Subsequently it was found that many other factors also influence
worker behavior, and it was not clear what was actually influencing
the Hawthorne workers’ behavior.
However, this particular effect—which became known as the
Hawthorne effect —seemed to suggest that workers’ attitudes
toward their managers affect the level of workers’ performance.
In particular, the significant finding was that each manager’s
personal behavior or leadership approach can affect performance.
This finding led many researchers to turn their attention to
managerial behavior and leadership.
If supervisors could be trained to behave in ways that would elicit
cooperative behavior from their subordinates, productivity could be
increased.
From this view emerged the human relations movement , which
advocates that supervisors be behaviorally trained to manage
subordinates in ways that elicit their cooperation and increase their
productivity.
The importance of behavioral or human relations training became
even clearer to its supporters after another series of
experiments—the bank wiring room experiments
Workers who violated this informal production norm were
subjected to sanctions by other group members.
Those who violated group performance norms and performed
above the norm were called “ratebusters”; those who performed
below the norm were called “chiselers.”
The experimenters concluded that both types of workers threatened
the group as a whole.
Ratebusters threatened group members because they revealed to
managers how fast the work could be done.
Chiselers were looked down on because they were not doing their
share of the work.
One implication of the Hawthorne studies was that the behavior of
managers and workers in the work setting is as important in
explaining the level of performance as the technical aspects of the
task.
Managers must understand the workings of the informal
organization , the system of behavioral rules and norms that emerge
in a group, when they try to manage or change behavior in
organizations.
Many studies have found that as time passes, groups often develop
elaborate procedures and norms that bond members together,
allowing unified action either to cooperate with management to
raise performance or to restrict output and thwart the attainment of
organizational goals.
It was becoming increasingly clear to researchers that
understanding behavior in organizations is a complex process that is
critical to increasing performance.
5 Indeed, the increasing interest in the area of management known
as organizational behavior , the study of the factors that have an
impact on how individuals and groups respond to and act in
organizations, dates from these early studies.
(Jones, George, 2016)
Textbook 2 :
The behavioral science approach uses scientific methods and draws
from sociology, psychology,anthropology,economics and other
disciplines to develop theories about human behavior and
interaction in an organizational setting.
One specific set of management techniques based in the behavioral
sciences approach is organization development (OD).
In the 1970s, organization development evolved as a separate field
that applied the behavioral sciences to improve internal
relationships and increases problem-solving capabilites.
Other concepts that grew out of the behavioral sciences approach
included matrix organizations, self-managed teams, ideas about
corporate culture, and management by wandering around.
(Daft, 2012)
Textbook 3 :
The behavioral perspective incorporates psychological and social
process of human behavior to improve productivity and work
satisfactions.
Operational theorists view management as a mechanical process in
which employees would fit into any job or organization designed
for optimum efficiency if given monetary incentives to do so.
Hawthorne effect is the finding that paying special attention to
employees motivates them to put greater effort into their jobs (from
the Hawthorne management studies)
They labelled the phenomenon the Hawthorne effect, and suggested
that when a manager or leader shows concern for employees, their
motivation and productivity are likely to improve.
Later studies at Hawthorne revealed that the informal organization
had a profound effect on a group productivity.
Individuals who exceeded the group performance norm were
considered ‘ratebusters” and those who perform below the norm
were viewed as the “chiselers”.
The work group disciplined both types of norm violations because
ratebusters could speed up the pace of work beyond what we
considered fair, while chiselers avoided doing the fair share of the
work.
The Hawthorne studies provided evidence that employee attitudes
significantly affect performance in a manner which differs from the
financial incentives championed by advocates of scientific
management.
(Gomez-mejia/ Balkin/ Cardy, 2015)
Example from textbook (Robbin 2016) :
In fact, his intention to restore quality control led him to a decision
to close (all that times) 7,100 U.S. stores for one evening to retrain
135,00 baristas on the coffee experience . . . what it meant, what it
wa.
It was a bold decision, and one that many “experts” felt would be a
disaster.
Another controversial decision was to hold a leadership conference
with all store managers (some 8000 of them) and 2000 other
partners-all at one time and locations. Why ?
To energize and galvanize these employees around what starbucks
stands for and what needed to be done for the company to survive
and prosper.
Example from internet :
Howard believes in treating people with respect and dignity.
He always cared about his employees and gave them the
opportunities to come forward and show their abilities for the
company.
In 1999, Schultz stepped down from the post of CEO for Smith and
continued as chairman and chief global strategist of company.
According to Howard's, "treat people like family and they will be
loyal and give their all" and on his philosophy Starbucks created
different benefit programs for employees including part timers.
It consist of stock share plan, work life balance etc.
Schultz played a major role in developing an employee ownership
program at Starbucks shortly after he bought the company.
He introduced 'Bean Stock' plan in which all employees were
eligible to get the shares of the company.
Make them feel like an owner improved employee's performance
and to retain them.
It boosted employee commitment and maintained low employee
turnover (Long, 2002).
4.1 Definition :
Based on research in space-time geometry, one airline innovated a
unique boarding process called “reverse pyramid” that has at least
two minutes in boarding time.
This is an example for the quantitative approach, which is the use of
quantitative techniques to improve decision making.
This approach also is known as management science.
What exactly does quantitative approach do? It involves applying
statistics optimization models, information models, computer
simulations and other quantitative techniques to management
activities.
Work scheduling can be more efficient as a result of critical-path
scheduling analysis.
The economic order quantity model helps managers determine
optimum inventory levels.
Another area where quantitative techniques are used frequently is in
total quality management.
Textbook 1 :
Management science theory is a contemporary approach to
management that focuses on the use of rigorous quantitative
techniques to help managers make maximum use of organizational
resources to produce goods and services.
In essence, management science theory is a contemporary extension
of scientific management, which, as developed by Taylor, also took
a quantitative approach to measuring the worker–task mix to raise
efficiency.
There are many branches of management science; and IT, which is
having a significant impact on all kinds of management practices, is
affecting the tools managers use to make decisions.
Quantitative management uses mathematical techniques—such as
linear and nonlinear programming, modeling, simulation, queuing
theory, and chaos theory—to help managers decide, for example,
how much inventory to hold at different times of the year, where to
locate a new factory, and how best to invest an organization’s
financial capital.
IT offers managers new and improved ways of handling information
so they can make more accurate assessments of the situation and
better decisions.
Operations management gives managers a set of techniques they
can use to analyze any aspect of an organization’s production
system to increase efficiency.
IT, through the Internet and through growing B2B networks, is
transforming how managers acquire inputs and dispose of finished
products.
Total quality management (TQM) focuses on analyzing an
organization’s input, conversion, and output activities to increase
product quality.
Once again, through sophisticated software packages and
computer-controlled production, IT is changing how managers and
employees think about the work process and ways of improving it.
Management information systems (MISs) give managers
information about events occurring inside the organization as well
as in its external environment—information that is vital for effective
decision making.
IT gives managers access to more and better information and
allows more managers at all levels to participate in the decision
making process.
(Jones, George, 2016)
Textbook 2 :
The quantitative perspective also referred to as management
science, provided a way to address those problems.
This view is distinguished for its application of mathematics,
statistics and other quantitative techniques to management decision
making and problem solving.
Managers soon saw how quantitative techniques could be applied to
large-scale business firms.
Let’s look at three subsets of the quantitative perspective.
Operations research grew directly out of the World War II military
groups (called operational research teams in Great Britain and
operations research teams in United States). It consists of
mathematical model building and other applications of
quantitative techniques to managerial problems.
Operations management refers to the field of management that
specializes in the physical production of goods and services.
Operations management specialist use a quantitative techniques to
solve the manufacturing problems.
Information technology (IT) is the most recent sub field of the
quantitative perspective. Which is often reflected in management
information system design to provided relevant information o
managers in a timely and cos-efficient manners.
(Daft 2012)
Textbook 3 :
The focus is on the development of various statistical tools and
techniques to improve efficiency and allow management to make
informed decisions regarding the costs and benefits of alternative
course of action.
Four of these quantitative methods, which are still widely use today,
included : (1) break-even analysis (2) basic economic order quantity
(EOQ) (3) material requirement planning, MRP and (4) quality
management.
Break-even analysis.
Break-even analysis provides formulas which assess the total
fixed costs associated with producing a product, the variable costs
for each units, and the contribution made by the sales of each unit to
recovering both fixed and variable cost.
The break-even point is the number of units which must be sold
at a given price to recover all fixed and variable costs.
Quality management
Total quality management (TQM) is an organization wide
approach that focuses on quality as an overarching goal.
The basis of this approach is the understanding that all
employees and organizational units should be working
harmoniously to satisfy the customer.
The TQM perspective views quality as the central purpose of
the organization, in contrast to the focus on efficiency advocated by
the operational perspective.
The key elements of the TQM approach are
Focus on the customer : it is important to identify the
organization’s customers. External customers consume the
organization’s product or service. Internal customers are employees
who receive the output of employees.
Employee involvement : since quality is considered the job of
all employees, employees should be involved in quality initiatives.
Front-line employees are likely to have the closet contact with
external customers and thus can make the most valuable
contributions to quality. In TQM workers are are often organized
into empowered teams that have the authority to make the quality
improvements.
Continuous improvement : the quest for quality is a
never-ending process in which people are continuously working to
improve the performance, speed, and number of features of the
product or service. Continuous improvement means that small,
incremental improvements that occur on a regular basis will
eventually add up to vast improvements in quality.
(Gomez-mejia/ Balkin/ Cardy, 2015)
Example in textbook (Robbins 2016) :
Starbucks’ main product is coffee- more than 30 blends and
single-origin coffees.
In addition to fresh-brewed coffee, here’s a sampling of other
products the company also offers :
Handcrafted beverages: Hot and ice espresso beverages, coffee and
noncoffee blended beverage, Tazo teas and smoothies.
Merchandise : Home espresso machines, coffee brewers and
grinders, premium chocolates, coffee mugs and coffee accessories,
compact discs, and other assorted items.
Global consumer products : Starbucks Frappuccino coffee drinks,
Starbucks Iced Coffee drinks, Starbucks Liqueurs and a line os
super-premium ice creams.
Starbucks card and my starbucks rewards program: A reloadable
stored-value card and a consumer rewards program
Brand Portfolio : Starbucks Entertainment, Ethos Water, Seattle’s
Best Coffee and Tazo tea.
Example in internet :
Starbucks has been a successful company over many decades
largely because of its stellar business strategies.
The company engages in both horizontal and vertical integration.
Horizontal integration is evident in Starbucks' evolution of
products.
Vertical integration can be seen in the acquisitions that support the
supply chain and business operations.
Market research is appropriate for each change in the integration of
operations that will be customer-facing or will impact the services
customers experience.
Consider that Starbucks has conducted market research on dairy
substitutes in its hand-crafted coffee beverages.
Note also that Starbucks is highly attentive to monitoring social
medianetworks for consumer brand affinity and customer
complaint.
Starbucks also actively solicits customer suggestions on its website.
Market research can take many different forms and can also be
conducted on the major channels.
For their market research on dairy substitutes in coffee beverages,
Starbucks employed at least these three market research approaches:
Cultural trends (the dairy "problem," health-conscious
consumers, nut allergies)
Environmental factors in supply chain management (the
almond crop "problem")
Social media monitoring (word-of-mouth, brand ambassadors)
Customer preferences tracking (website customer comments)
In-store product testing
5.1 Definition :
Starting in the 1960s, management began to look at what was
happening in the external environment outside the boundaries of the
organization.
Two contemporary management perspectives-system and and
contingency-are part of this approach.
A system is a set of interrelated and interdependent parts arranged
in a manner that produce a unified whole.
Closed system are not influenced by and do not interact with their
environment.
In contrast, open systems are influenced by and do interact with
their environment.
Exhibit MH-7: organization as an open system
At the input stage an organization acquires resources such as raw
materials, money, and skilled workers to produce goods and
services.
The money the organization obtains from the sales of its outputs
allows the organization to acquire more resources so the cycle can
begin again.
Systems theorists like to argue that the whole is greater than the
sum of its parts; they mean that an organization performs at a higher
level when its departments work together rather than separately.
A supply chain is a network of multiple businesses and individuals
that are connected through the flow of products or services.
(Daft,2012)
Textbook 3 :
The systems theory a modern management theory that views the
organization as a system of interrelated parts that function in a
holistic way to achieve a common purpose.
Open and closed systems :
Open systems interact with the environment in order to survive.
Closed systems do not need to interact with the environment.
The operational and bureaucratic perspectives on management
treated the organization as if it were a closed system by overlooking
the effect of the environment of management practice.
Systems theory argues that the environment must always be
taken into consideration in management decision thinking.
(Gomez-mejia/ Balkin/ Cardy, 2015)
Example from textbook (Robbins 2016) :
His goals were to fix the troubled stores, to reawaken the emotional
attachment with customers, and to make long-terms changes like
reorganizing the company and revamping the supply chain.
The first thing he did.however was o apologize to the staff for the
decision that had brought the company to this point.
Example from internet :
One thing that’s been important to Howard Schultz from day one is
the relationship he has with his employees.
He treasures those relationships and feels they’re critically
important to the way the company develops its relationship with its
customers and the way it is viewed by the public.
He says, “we know that our people are the heart and soul of our
success.”
Starbucks 200,000-plus employees worldwide serve millions of
customer each week.
That’s a lot of opportunities to either satisfy or disappoint the
customer.
The experiences customers have in the stores ultimately affect the
company’s relationship with its customers.
That’s why starbucks has created a unique relationship with its
employees. Starbucks provides all employees who work more than
20 hours a week health care benefits and stock options.
Suggestion and Recommendation :
Throughout the history management, experts have learned ways to
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of work.
What was learned in each of the periods of management
development still hold some truth and usefulness for managers
today.
Companies like Starbucks would benefit from the use of scientific
management and the quantitative approaches in the production side
of their business.
Scientific management could be used to make their retail
establishments more efficient and quantitative management can help
to improve the logistics of the company.
Examining how organizational behavior can be used, the company
already applies some technique to help employees feel like they are
contributing and to help increase employees satisfaction.
Managers should understand the use a number of Fayol’s fourteen
management principles, including division of work esprit de corps,
and unity of command.
Summary :
Starbucks managers an top executives alike must view the company
as a complete system, realizing that the successful management and
operation of each part of the company affects the well being of the
entire corporations.
P1-11 How might biases and errors affect the decision making done by Starbucks
executives? By Starbucks store managers? By Starbucks partners?
1.0 Introduction:
2.0 Decision-Making Biases and Errors
2.1 Definition :
When managers make decisions, they not only use their own
particular style, they may use “rules of thumbs” or heuristic, to
simplify their decision making.
Why? Because they may lead to errors and biases in processing and
evaluating information.
When decision makers tend to think they know more than they do
or hold unrealistically positive views of themselves and their
performance, they’re exhibiting the overconfidence bias.
This influences the information they pay attention to, the problem
they identify, and the alternatives they develop.
Decision makers who seek out information that reaffirms their past
choices and discounts information that contradicts past judgments
exhibit the confirmation bias.
The sunk costs error occurs when decision makers forget that
current choices cant correct the pass.
Decision makers who are quick to take credit for their successes
and to blame the failure on outside factors are exhibiting the
self-serving bias.
Beyond that, the managers also should pay attention to “how” they
make decisions and try identify the heuristic they typically use and
critically evaluate the appropriateness of those heuristic.
Textbook 1 :
In the 1970s psychologists Daniel Kahneman and the late Amos
Tversky suggested that because all decision makers are subject to
bounded rationality, they tend to use heuristics , which are rules of
thumb that simplify the process of making decisions
Kahneman and Tversky argued that rules of thumb are often useful
because they help decision makers make sense of complex,
uncertain, and ambiguous information.
Systematic errors are errors that people make over and over and
that result in poor decision making
Because of cognitive biases, which are caused by systematic errors,
otherwise capable managers may end up making bad decisions
0 Four sources of bias that can adversely affect the way managers
make decisions are prior hypotheses, representativeness, the
illusion of control, and escalating commitment (see Figure 7.6 )
Prior hypothesis bias is a decision makers who have strong prior
beliefs about the relationship between two variables tend to make
decisions based on those beliefs even when presented with
evidence that their beliefs are wrong. In doing so, they fall victim
to prior hypothesis bias .
Moreover, decision makers tend to seek and use information that
is consistent with their prior beliefs and to ignore information that
contradicts those beliefs.
Representativenes bias has many decision makers inappropriately
generalize from a small sample or even from a single vivid case or
episode; these are instances of the representativeness bias
Illusion eror is other errors in decision making result from the
illusion of control , which is the tendency of decision makers to
overestimate their ability to control activities and events. Top
managers seem particularly prone to this bias.
Having worked their way to the top of an organization, they tend to
have an exaggerated sense of their own worth and are
overconfident about their ability to succeed and to control events.
The illusion of control causes managers to overestimate the odds of
a favorable outcome and, consequently, to make inappropriate
decisions.
As mentioned earlier, most mergers turn out unfavorably; yet time
and time again, top managers overestimate their abilities to
combine companies with vastly different cultures in a successful
merger
Escalating commitment having already committed significant
resources to a course of action, some managers commit more
resources to the project even if they receive feedback that the
project is failing.
Feelings of personal responsibility for a project apparently bias the
analysis of decision makers and lead to this escalating
commitment .
The managers decide to increase their investment of time and
money in a course of action and even ignore evidence that it is
illegal, unethical, uneconomical, or impractical (see Figure 7.5 ).
Often the more appropriate decision would be to cut their losses
and run.
Be aware of your biases is how can managers avoid the negative
effects of cognitive biases and improve their decision making and
problem-solving abilities? Managers must become aware of biases
and their effects, and they must identify their own personal style of
making decisions.
One useful way for managers to analyze their decision-making
style is to review two decisions that they made recently—one
decision that turned out well and one that turned out poorly.
Problem-solving experts recommend that managers start by
determining how much time to spend on each of the
decision-making steps, such as gathering information to identify
the pros and cons of alternatives or ranking the alternatives, to
make sure they spend sufficient time on each step.
(Jones, George, 2016)
Textbook 2 :
Heuristics or “rules of thumb” is a strategies that simplify the
process of making decisions.
Among those that tend to bias how decision makers process
information are (1) availability; (2) representativeness;
(3)confirmation; (4) sunk costs; (5) anchoring and adjustment and
(6) escalation of commitment
The availability bias: using only the information available
This is because of the availability bias- managers use
information readily available from memory to make judgments.
The bias, of course, is that readily available information may
not present a complete picture of a situation.
The availability bias may be stocked by the news media, which
tends to favor news that is unusual or dramatic.
The confirmation bias : seeking information to support one’s point
of view.
The confirmation bias is when people seek information to
support their point of view and discount data that do not.
Textbook 3 :
It is a major leap of faith to assume that all decision making is
rational. It is not. This is because rational decision making is based
on the following assumptions:
The problem is clear and unambiguous
There is a single, well-defined goal that all parties agree to.
Full information is available.
All the alternatives and their consequences are known.
The decision preferences are clear.
The decision preferences are constant and stable over time.
There are no time and cost constraints affecting the decision.
The decision solution will maximize the economic payoff.
Organization politics :
Organizations are likely to have coalitions, which are political
alliances between employees who agree on goals and priorities.
Organization politics involves the exercise of power in an
organization to control resources and influence policy.
Organization politics is more likely to be present in firms with
democratic culture where power is decentralized and decisions are
made through consensus.
Emotions and personal preferences :
Decision makers are not robots choosing alternatives without
emotion or passion.
Many times a poor decision is reached because the decision
makers is having a bad day.
The two emotions which are the most disruptive to quality
decision making are anger and depression.
Personal preferences include a variety of individual quirks.
It is vital to make certain the person or group making a
decision is not swayed by an individual agenda o pattern of
decision making.
Illusion of control :
Another limitation of rational decision making results from the
illusion of control, which is the tendency for a decision maker to be
overconfident of his or her ability to control activities and events.
Top executives are especially susceptible to this problem,
because they can be isolated from the rank and file employees and
may be surrounded with “yes men”
(Gomez-meija/Balkin/cardy, 2015)
Example from textbook (Robbins 2016) :
On thing you may not realize is that after running the show for 15
years at Starbucks, Howard Schultz, at age 46 stepped out of the
CEO job in 200 (he remained as chairman of the company) because
he was “a bit bored.”
At first the company thrived, but then the perils of rapid
mass-market expansion began to set in ans customer traffic began
to fall for the first time ever.
As he watched what was happening, there were times when he felt
the decision being made were not good ones.
In fact, his intention to restore quality control led him to a decision
o close all (at that time) 7100 U.S. stores for one evening to retrain
135,000 baristas on the coffee experience. . . what it meant, what it
was.
It was a bold decision, and one that many “experts” felt would be a
public relations and financial disasters.
Example from the internet :
On Schultz's return from Italy, he shared his revelation and ideas
for modifying the format of Starbucks stores with Baldwin and
Bowker.
But instead of winning their approval, Schultz encountered strong
resistance.
Baldwin and Bowker argued that Starbucks was a retailer, not a
restaurant or bar.
They feared that serving drinks would put them in the beverage
business and dilute the integrity of Starbucks' mission as a coffee
store.
They pointed out that Starbucks was a profitable small, private
company and there was no reason to rock the boat.
But a more pressing reason for their resistance emerged
shortly—Baldwin and Bowker were excited by an opportunity to
purchase Peet's Coffee and Tea.
The acquisition took place in 1984; to fund it, Starbucks had to
take on considerable debt, leaving little in the way of financial
flexibility to support Schultz's ideas for entering the beverage part
of the coffee business or expanding the number of Starbucks stores.
For most of 1984, Starbucks managers were dividing their time
between their operations in Seattle and the Peet's enterprise in San
Francisco.
Schultz found himself in San Francisco every other week
supervising the marketing and operations of the five Peet's stores.
Starbucks employees began to feel neglected and, in one quarter,
did not receive their usual bonus due to tight financial conditions.
Employee discontent escalated to the point where a union election
was called, and the union won by three votes.
Baldwin was shocked at the results, concluding that employees no
longer trusted him.
In the months that followed, he began to spend more of his energy
on the Peet's operation in San Francisco.
It took Howard Schultz nearly a year to convince Jerry Baldwin to
let him test an espresso bar. After Baldwin relented, Starbucks'
sixth store, which opened in April 1984, became the first one
designed to sell beverages and the first one in downtown Seattle.
Schultz asked for a 1,500-square-foot space to set up a full-scale
Italian-style espresso bar, but Jerry agreed to allocating only 300
square feet in a corner of the new store.
There was no pre-opening marketing blitz and no sign announcing
Now Serving Espresso—the lack of fanfare was part of a deliberate
experiment to see what would happen.
By closing time on the first day, some 400 customers had been
served, well above the 250-customer average of Starbucks'
best-performing stores.
Within two months the store was serving 800 customers per day.
The two baristas could not keep up with orders during the early
morning hours, resulting in lines outside the door onto the
sidewalk.
Most of the business was at the espresso counter; sales at the
regular retail counter were only adequate.
Schultz was elated by the test results; his visits to the store
indicated that it was becoming a gathering place and that customers
were pleased with the beverages being served.
Schultz expected that Baldwin's doubts about entering the beverage
side of the business would be dispelled and that he would gain
approval to take Starbucks to a new level.
Every day he went into Baldwin's office to show him the sales
figures and customer counts at the new downtown store.
But Baldwin was not comfortable with the success of the new
store; he believed that espresso drinks were a distraction from the
core business of selling fine arabica coffees at retail and rebelled at
the thought that people would see Starbucks as a place to get a
quick cup of coffee to go.
He adamantly told Schultz, "We're coffee roasters. I don't want to
be in the restaurant business . . . Besides, we're too deeply in debt
to consider pursuing this idea."
While he didn't deny that the experiment was succeeding, he didn't
want to go forward with introducing beverages in other Starbucks
stores.
Schultz's efforts to persuade Baldwin to change his mind continued
to meet strong resistance, although to avoid a total impasse
Baldwin finally did agree to let Schultz put espresso machines in
the back of two other Starbucks stores.
Over the next several months, Schultz—at the age of 33—made up
his mind to leave Starbucks and start his own company.
His plan was to open espresso bars in high-traffic downtown
locations that would emulate the friendly, energetic atmosphere he
had encountered in Italian espresso bars.
Schultz had become friends with a corporate lawyer, Scott
Greenberg, who helped companies raise venture capital and go
public.
Greenberg told Schultz he believed investors would be interested in
providing venture capital for the kind of company Schultz had in
mind.
Baldwin and Bowker, knowing how frustrated Schultz had
become, supported his efforts to go out on his own and agreed to
let him stay in his current job and office until definitive plans were
in place.
Schultz left Starbucks in late 1985.