Research Article: Clinical Characteristics in Patients With Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Research Article: Clinical Characteristics in Patients With Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Research Article: Clinical Characteristics in Patients With Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Research Article
Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Triple Negative
Breast Cancer
Janet Yeh,1 Jennifer Chun,1 Shira Schwartz,1 Annie Wang,2 Elizabeth Kern,3
Amber A. Guth,1 Deborah Axelrod,1 Richard Shapiro,1 and Freya Schnabel1
1
Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
2
School of Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
3
Drexel University, School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Copyright © 2017 Janet Yeh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast the clinical characteristics of the triple negative breast cancer
(TNBC) and non-TNBC patients, with a particular focus on genetic susceptibility and risk factors prior to diagnosis. Methods.
Our institutional database was queried for all patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between January 2010 and May 2016.
Results. Out of a total of 1964 patients, 190 (10%) patients had TNBC. The median age for both TNBC and non-TNBC was 59 years.
There was a significantly higher proportion of African American and Asian patients with TNBC (𝑝 = 0.0003) compared to patients
with non-TNBC. BRCA1 and BRCA2 were significantly associated with TNBC (𝑝 < 0.0001, 𝑝 = 0.0007). A prior history of breast
cancer was significantly associated with TNBC (𝑝 = 0.0003). There was no relationship observed between TNBC and a history of
chemoprevention or patients who had a history of AH or LCIS. Conclusions. We found that having Asian ancestry, a prior history
of breast cancer, and a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation all appear to be positively associated with TNBC. In order to develop more
effective treatments, better surveillance, and improved prevention strategies, it is necessary to improve our understanding of the
population at risk for TNBC.
of TNBC among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, were 31 (5%) patients who were BRCA1 positive and 29 (5%)
and Hispanic patients in the California Cancer Registry; who were BRCA2 positive. As expected, the majority of breast
they confirmed the association and asserted a steeper rise cancer patients had tumors that were early stage, stage I or II,
in incidence of TNBC with age among African American (91%) and of ductal histology (81%).
women [21]. Multiple locoregional studies demonstrate that Out of a total of 1964 patients, 190 (10%) patients had
TNBC comprises 20–40% studies of African American breast TNBC and 1774 (90%) had non-TNBC. The median age
cancer patients [1, 21–24]. However, there have not been any for both TNBC and non-TNBC was 59 years. There was
American studies analyzing TNBC in the Asian population. a significantly higher proportion of African American and
Among 972 breast cancer patients at the Dr. B. Borooah Asian patients with TNBC (𝑝 = 0.0003) compared to
Cancer Institute in India, 31.9% were defined as TNBC patients with non-TNBC (Table 1). BRCA1 and BRCA2 were
[25]. Additionally, the University Malaya Medical Center in significantly associated with TNBC (𝑝 < 0.0001, 𝑝 = 0.0007).
Malaysia reports a 17.6% incidence of TNBC among 1147 A prior history of breast cancer was significantly associated
breast cancer patients of Chinese, Malay, and Indian descent with triple negative histology in our study (𝑝 = 0.0003).
[26]. From these international reports, we suspect that TNBC There was no relationship observed between TNBC status
may affect a large proportion of Asian American patients. and a history of chemoprevention. Likewise, there was no
The present study was designed to compare and contrast relationship between TNBC status and patients who had a
the clinical characteristics of the TNBC and non-TNBC history of AH or LCIS (Table 1). When compared to patients
patients in the New York University Breast Cancer Database with non-TNBC, patients with TNBC were more likely to
(BCD), with a particular focus on genetic susceptibility and have undergone neoadjuvant treatment (𝑝 < 0.0001). As
risk factors prior to cancer diagnosis. compared to patients with non-TNBC, patients with TNBC
were also more likely to have later stage disease (𝑝 = 0.0001),
2. Methods invasive ductal carcinomas (𝑝 < 0.0001), and higher Ki-67
(𝑝 < 0.0001) (Table 2).
2.1. Study Participants. The Breast Cancer Database (BCD)
is a longitudinal study that was established at our institution 4. Discussion
in January 2010. All patients undergoing definitive breast
cancer surgery for a newly diagnosed breast cancer at our The results of our study both confirm known associations of
institution are eligible to enroll in the BCD. The variables TNBC and identify significant notable findings specific to our
collected for the database include information on personal TNBC population. Similar to findings in previous studies,
and family history, screening history, methods of diagnosis, our TNBC patients had an increased proportion of African
tumor histology and stage at diagnosis, details of treatment, American patients and a higher percentage of BRCA muta-
and outcomes. All clinical data are obtained from detailed tion carriers when compared to the non-TNBC population. A
questionnaires that are filled out at the time of surgery and significant association between TNBC and previous history
from a review of electronic medical records. The Breast of breast cancer was also seen. No association was found
Cancer Database was queried for all patients who were between TNBC and prior history of atypical hyperplasia or
diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between January 2010 LCIS. Contrary to many previously published studies, we
and May 2016. This study was approved by the Institutional found a higher proportion of Asians with TNBC. We also
Review Board. found that the median age in both TNBC and non-TNBC
cohorts was 59 years.
2.2. Statistical Analyses. Descriptive statistics were used to TNBC has been shown to be associated with a 10.6–30.9%
summarize the data and to see the distribution of the variables carrier rate of deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations
between patients with TNBC and patients with non-TNBC. [7, 10, 13, 14]. Our data is consistent with an increased number
The variables of interest included age, race, personal and of carriers in our TNBC population. This may be due to
family history of breast cancer, BRCA1 and BRCA2 status, the unique racial distribution of our patients. Internationally,
and tumor characteristics. Pearson’s chi-square and Fisher’s there are differences in BRCA1 and 2 prevalence; for example,
exact tests were used to assess any associations between among 190 TNBC patients in Mexico City, 23% were found
the categorical variables of interest and TNBC status with to have a founder BRCA1 mutation (BRCA1 ex9-12del)
a significance level of 0.05. Logistic regression was used to [27], while BRCA risk calculators developed in Caucasian
test for any associations between the continuous predictor populations consistently underestimate BRCA risk in Asian
variables, age and tumor size, and TNBC. All analyses were patients [28]. We postulate that the higher proportion of
performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, Asian American patients in our database may account for this
NC). discrepancy with previous literature. The NCCN guidelines
recommend that all women with TNBC and 60 years of age or
3. Results younger should undergo genetic counseling [18]; moreover,
our study supports the NCCN guideline and underlines the
During the study period, a total of 1964 patients with invasive importance of genetic counseling for TNBC patients.
breast cancer were enrolled in the Breast Cancer Database. There was a significant association between TNBC and
The majority of patients in the study cohort were Caucasian individuals of African American and Asian heritage within
(76%). The median age was 59 years (22–95 years). There our cohort. We identified 18% and 13% of individuals in the
International Journal of Breast Cancer 3
triple receptor-negative breast cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, population,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 696–
vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1082–1089, 2011. 702, 2013.
[15] J. Balmaña, O. Dı́ez, I. T. Rubio, and F. Cardoso, “BRCA in breast [30] K. Lakshmaiah, U. Das, T. Suresh et al., “A study of triple
cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines,” Annals of Oncology, negative breast cancer at a tertiary cancer care center in
vol. 22, no. 6, pp. vi31–vi34, 2011. southern India,” Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research,
[16] J. S. Kwon, A. M. Gutierrez-Barrera, D. Young et al., “Expanding vol. 4, no. 6, p. 933, 2014.
the criteria for BRCA mutation testing in breast cancer sur- [31] V. G. Vogel, “Ongoing data from the breast cancer prevention
vivors,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 27, pp. 4214– trials: Opportunity for breast cancer risk reduction,” BMC
4220, 2010. Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, article no. 63, 2015.
[17] J. D. Fackenthal and O. I. Olopade, “Breast cancer risk associated [32] J. Cuzick, I. Sestak, S. Cawthorn et al., “Tamoxifen for preven-
with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in diverse populations,” Nature Reviews tion of breast cancer: extended long-term follow-up of the IBIS-
Cancer, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 937–948, 2007. I breast cancer prevention trial,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 16,
[18] NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN no. 1, pp. 67–75, 2015.
Guidelines) Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast [33] V. G. Vogel, J. P. Costantino, D. L. Wickerham et al., “Effects
and Ovarian, (ed 4.2013), National Comprehensive Cancer of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive
Network. breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of
[19] K. R. Bauer, M. Brown, R. D. Cress, C. A. Parise, and V. Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial,” JAMA, vol. 295, pp.
Caggiano, “Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)- 2727–2741, 2006.
negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2- [34] L. C. Hartmann, A. C. Degnim, R. J. Santen, W. D. Dupont, and
negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative K. Ghosh, “Atypical hyperplasia of the breast-risk assessment
phenotype,” Cancer, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 1721–1728, 2007. and management options,” New England Journal of Medicine,
[20] P. Boyle, “Triple-negative breast cancer: epidemiological con- vol. 372, no. 1, pp. 78–89, 2015.
siderations and recommendations,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 23, [35] W. D. Dupont and D. L. Page, “Risk factors for breast cancer
no. 6, Article ID mds187, pp. vi7–vi12, 2012. in women with proliferative breast disease,” The New England
[21] K. C. Amirikia, P. Mills, J. Bush, and L. A. Newman, “Higher Journal of Medicine, vol. 312, no. 3, pp. 146–151, 1985.
population-based incidence rates of triple-negative breast can- [36] S. Li, J. Liu, Y. Yang et al., “Impact of atypical hyperplasia
cer among young African-American women. Implications for at margins of breast-conserving surgery on the recurrence of
breast cancer screening recommendations,” Cancer, vol. 117, no. breast cancer,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology,
12, pp. 2747–2753, 2011. vol. 140, no. 4, pp. 599–605, 2014.
[22] M. J. Lund, K. F. Trivers, P. L. Porter et al., “Race and triple
[37] R. G. Roetzheim, J.-H. Lee, W. Fulp et al., “Acceptance and
negative threats to breast cancer survival: A population-based
adherence to chemoprevention among women at increased risk
study in Atlanta, GA,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment,
of breast cancer,” Breast, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 51–56, 2015.
vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 357–370, 2009.
[38] S. Pruthi, R. E. Heisey, and T. B. Bevers, “Chemoprevention for
[23] G. J. Morris, S. Naidu, and A. K. Topham, “Differences in
breast cancer,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 10, pp.
breast carcinoma characteristics in newly diagnosed African-
3230–3235, 2015.
American and Caucasian patients: a single-institution compila-
tion compared with the national cancer institute’s surveillance, [39] A. Bosch, P. Eroles, R. Zaragoza, J. R. Viña, and A. Lluch,
epidemiology, and end results database,” Cancer, vol. 110, no. 4, “Triple-negative breast cancer: Molecular features, pathogene-
pp. 876–884, 2007. sis, treatment and current lines of research,” Cancer Treatment
Reviews, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 206–215, 2010.
[24] M. S. Moran, Q. Yang, L. N. Harris, B. Jones, D. P. Tuck, and B. G.
Haffty, “Long-term outcomes and clinicopathologic differences
of African-American versus white patients treated with breast
conservation therapy for early-stage breast cancer,” Cancer, vol.
113, no. 9, pp. 2565–2574, 2008.
[25] M. Sharma, J. D. Sharma, A. Sarma et al., “Triple negative breast
cancer in people of North East India: Critical insights gained
at a regional cancer centre,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer
Prevention, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 4507–4511, 2014.
[26] G. H. Tan, N. A. Taib, W. Y. Choo et al., “Clinical characteristics
of triple-negative breast cancer: experience in an Asian devel-
oping country,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Preventionv, vol.
10, pp. 395–398, 2009.
[27] C. Villarreal-Garza, J. N. Weitzel, M. Llacuachaqui et al., “The
prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among young
Mexican women with triple-negative breast cancer,” Breast
Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 389–394,
2015.
[28] H. Kim and D. H. Choi, “Distribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2
mutations in asian patients with breast cancer,” Journal of Breast
Cancer, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 357–365, 2013.
[29] R. H. Jack, E. A. Davies, C. Renshaw et al., “Differences in breast
cancer hormone receptor status in ethnic groups: A London
MEDIATORS of
INFLAMMATION
BioMed
PPAR Research
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Research International
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Obesity
Evidence-Based
Journal of Stem Cells Complementary and Journal of
Ophthalmology
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
International
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Alternative Medicine
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Oncology
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Parkinson’s
Disease
Computational and
Mathematical Methods
in Medicine
Behavioural
Neurology
AIDS
Research and Treatment
Oxidative Medicine and
Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014