1.SACQ - Student Adaptation To College
1.SACQ - Student Adaptation To College
1.SACQ - Student Adaptation To College
The 67 statements on this form describe college experiences. Read each one and decide how well it applies to you at the
present time (within the past few days). For each statement, select the asterisk at the point in the continuum that best
represents how closely the statement applies to you. Select only one asterisk for each statement.
Participant’s adjustment to college will be measured by the SACQ. The original SACQ (Baker &
Siryk, 1984) was created over a three year period using successive academic freshman classes and included 52
items. The present SACQ is a two-page 67 item assessment composed of four sub-scales measuring academic
adjustment (24 items), social adjustment (20 items), personal-emotional adjustment (15 items), and goal
commitment-institutional attachment (15 items). It can be administered individually or in groups and takes
approximately 20 minutes to complete. Scores are rated on a 9-point Likert scale ranging from Doesn’t apply
to me at all. to Applies very closely to me. (Baker & Siryk, 1989; Dahmus & Bernardin, 1992).
The purpose in developing the SACQ was to create a way to assess needs for early counseling
interventions and to provide the research needed for institutional interventions (Baker & Siryk, 1984/1989).
Research, counseling and institutional interventions have been the most common uses of the SACQ (Dahmus
& Bernardin, 1992). The SACQ has been found to be a psychometrically sound instrument. For reliability the
alpha coefficients are .81 to .90 for academic adjustment, .83 to .91 for social adjustment, .77 to .86 for
personal-emotional adjustment, .85 to .91 for goal commitment-institutional attachment, and .92 to .95
for the full scale. Validity has been demonstrated by data indicating that the SACQ is significantly associated
with student academic performance and GPA (.17 to .53, p <.01), personal-emotional adjustment and contact
made with university counseling services (-.23 to .34, p < .01), and commitment institutional attachment and
attrition (-.27 to -.41, p < .01).
Comparisons with social adjustment have not been found statistically significant (Dahmus &
Bernardin, 1992). Compared with such measures as the Mental Health Inventory (Veit & Ware, 1983), State-
Trait Anxiety Inventory (Spielberger, 1983), Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (Fitts, 1965), and the
Psychological Distress Inventory (Lustman, et al., 1984) the SACQ revealed significant correlations (Dahmus
& Bernardin, 1992). As just discussed the SACQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire for the measurement of
an individual’s adjustment to college. In addition, a review of pertinent literature (see Chapter 2) shows that
the SACQ has been used in many studies to explore the relationship with parental attachment.
Products
Used at colleges throughout the country to increase student retention
At a Glance
Purpose: Assesses overall adjustment
to college, detecting
problems, guiding
intervention, and promoting
retention
Ages / Grade: College students
Administration
15 to 20 minutes
Time
Format: Self-report inventory
Norms Standardized on more than
1,300 college freshmen and
stratified by semester of
attendance (first or second)
This quick, convenient instrument helps determine how well a student is handling the demands of
college. SACQ assesses overall adjustment to college, as well as adjustment in four specific areas:
Academic Adjustment
Personal-Emotional Adjustment
Social Adjustment
Used by many universities for routine freshman screening, SACQ is a cost-effective way to detect
problems early in the student's college career. And because it indicates the nature of those problems,
SACQ provides clear guidelines for subsequent intervention. It is particularly useful in identifying
potential dropouts.
This 67-item, self-report questionnaire can be administered to individuals or groups in just 15 to 20
minutes. It can even be mailed to students, self-administered at home, and then returned for scoring. The
convenient AutoScoreTM Test Form simplifies scoring and profiling results.
If you are testing large groups of students, you may prefer computer scoring and interpretation. You
can use WPS TEST REPORT prepaid Mail-In Answer Sheets to get detailed interpretive reports. Norms
are based on a sample of more than 1,300 male and female college freshmen and stratified by semester
of attendance (first and second semesters in college). The SACQ Manual includes an extensive list of
studies using the test.
The questionnaire helps overcome the reluctance of many students to seek help--90 percent of those
with low SACQ scores accept offers of a posttest interview. The questionnaire gives you reason for
follow-up, as well as specific topics for discussion and a clear path toward effective intervention.
By detecting adjustment problems early, SACQ can help colleges retain students who might otherwise
drop out.
Description Qty.
Item No. Price
W-228 $99.00 KIT: Includes 25 Hand-Scored Questionnaires; 1 Manual 1
Abstract
International students have realistic expectations about their adjustment to college, however, they seem to
experience a more difficult transition than U.S. students. Scores on the Student Adaptation to College
Questionnaire for international and U.S. students are compared. The results indicated that international
students scored significantly lower on the social and the institutional attachment and goal commitment
subscales. The Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire may have applications in targeting international
student needs.
Fulltext Preview
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Student Adaptation to College
Questionnaire
1. Melinda A. Taylor
1. James Madison University, mtaylor@dpi.state.nc.us
1. Dena A. Pastor
1. James Madison University
Abstract
The construct validity of scores on the Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (SACQ) was examined
using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The purpose of this study was to test the fit of the SACQ authors'
proposed four-factor model using a sample of university students. Results indicated that the hypothesized
model did not fit. Additional CFAs specifying one-factor models for each subscale were performed to
diagnose areas of misfit, and results also indicated lack of fit. Exploratory factor analyses were then
conducted and a four-factor model, different from the model proposed by the authors, was examined to
provide information for future instrument revisions. It was concluded that researchers need to return to the
first stage of instrument development, which would entail examining not only the theories behind adjustment
to college in greater detail, but also how the current conceptualization of the SACQ relates to such theories.