Genesis of Suicide Terrorism
Genesis of Suicide Terrorism
Genesis of Suicide Terrorism
SOCIAL SCIENCE
A
ccording to the U.S. Department of ity in selective application of the concept of Order of Assassins (hashashin) during the
State report Patterns of Global Ter- terrorism to fluctuating U.S. priorities. The early Christian Crusades are legendary ex-
rorism 2001 (1), no single definition special category of “State-sponsored terror- amples (5). The concept of “terror” as sys-
of terrorism is universally accepted; however, ism” could be invoked to handle some issues tematic use of violence to attain political
for purposes of statistical analysis and policy- (3), but the highly selective and politically ends was first codified by Maximilien
making: “The term ‘terrorism’ means pre- tendentious use of the label terrorism would Robespierre during the French Revolution.
meditated, politically motivated violence per- continue all the same. Indeed, there appears He deemed it an “emanation of virtue” that
petrated against noncombatant targets by sub- to be no principled distinction between “ter- delivers “prompt, severe, and inflexible”
national groups or clandestine agents, usually ror” as defined by the U.S. Congress and justice, as “a consequence of the general
intended to influence an audience.” Of “counterinsurgency” as allowed in U.S. principle of democracy applied to our coun-
course, one side’s “terrorists” may well be armed forces manuals (4). try’s most pressing needs.” (6 ). The Reign
another side’s “freedom fighters” (Fig. 1). Rather than attempt to produce a stipu- of Terror, during which the ruling Jacobin
For example, in this definition’s sense, the lative and all-encompassing definition of faction exterminated thousands of potential
Nazi occupiers of France rightly denounced terrorism, this arti-
the “subnational” and “clandestine” French cle restricts its focus
Resistance fighters as terrorists. During the to “suicide terror-
1980s, the International Court of Justice used ism” characterized
the U.S. Administration’s own definition of as follows: the tar-
terrorism to call for an end to U.S. support for geted use of self-de-
“terrorism” on the part of Nicaraguan Contras structing humans
opposing peace talks. against noncomba-
For the U.S. Congress, “‘act of terrorism’ tant—typically ci-
means an activity that—(A) involves a vio- vilian—populations
lent act or an act dangerous to human life that to effect political
is a violation of the criminal laws of the change. Although a
United States or any State, or that would be a suicide attack aims
criminal violation if committed within the to physically destroy
jurisdiction of the United States or of any an initial target, its
State; and (B) appears to be intended (i) to primary use is typi-
intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) cally as a weapon of
to influence the policy of a government by psychological war-
intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the fare intended to af-
conduct of a government by assassination or fect a larger public
kidnapping.” (2). When suitable, the defini- audience. The pri- Fig. 1. Chanting demonstrators in Pakistan-held Kashmir defending
Osama bin Laden’s actions and ambitions as freedom-fighting (Novem-
tion can be broadened to include states hostile mary target is not ber 2001). [AP Photo/Roshan Mugal]
to U.S. policy. those actually killed
Apparently, two official definitions of ter- or injured in the at-
rorism have existed since the early 1980s: tack, but those made to witness it. The enemies, of whatever sex, age, or condi-
that used by the Department of State “for enemy’s own information media amplify tion, lasted until Robespierre’s fall ( July
statistical and analytical purposes” and that the attack’s effects to the larger target pop- 1794). Similar justification for state-spon-
used by Congress for criminal proceedings. ulation. Through indoctrination and train- sored terror was common to 20th-century
Together, the definitions allow great flexibil- ing and under charismatic leaders, self- revolutions, as in Russia (Lenin), Cambo-
contained suicide cells canalize disparate dia (Pol Pot), and Iran (Khomeini).
religious or political sentiments of individ- Whether subnational (e.g., Russian anar-
CNRS–Institut Jean Nicod, 1 bis Avenue Lowendal,
75007 Paris, France, and Institute for Social Research,
uals into an emotionally bonded group of chists) or state-supported (e.g., Japanese ka-
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 –1248, fictive kin who willfully commit to die mikaze), suicide attack as a weapon of terror
USA. E-mail: satran@umich.edu spectacularly for one another and for what is usually chosen by weaker parties against