Vibration School
Vibration School
Vibration School
What Is Vibration ?
You may have applications that do not fall neatly into the 4-
bearing machine category. Long drive lines with dozens of
bearings, gearboxes like the one shown on the previous page,
multi-stage machines, etc. may each require their own unique
solution for bearing naming. In the case of a long drive line,
the bearing may be named to coincide with the piece of
equipment along that drive line that bearing is closest to.
Conversely, you may decide to rely strictly on position
numbers in that case and not use position names at all. Terms
such as "Intermediate Shaft" may be used. There is no single,
universal naming convention that will apply to all machine
configurations. Remember the objective:
Vibration Characteristics:
Amplitude
What Does Amplitude Tell Us ?
How Much ?
Now let's look at each of these units more in-depth and see
how they are inter-related.
Measuring "How Much" in Displacement Units
Displacement measures the length of the "trip" back and forth
from (in this case) +X to -X (2X would be the total distance
travelled - the "peak-to-peak displacement"). One of these
"trips" is known as a "cycle" of vibration. The sequence of
images about to be presented show the bearing at various
important points during a single cycle with the transducer
oriented vertically (remember, the transducer only "sees"
movement in the direction of its orientation, or axis).
Since this movement must occur over time, when we measure
it we plot the amount (amplitude) on the y-axis and the time
taken (period) on the x-axis. The resulting shape, in its
simplest form, is called a "periodic signal", a "sinusoid" or a
"sine wave". That is the S-shape you see below the word
"cycle" in the image at right. Mechanical vibration generates a
wave shape that is rarely as simple as what we see here but
the intricacies of processing more complex data will be
covered in later sections.
The "At-Rest" position ("0") is the position the bearing
would assume if the machine was not running.
During a single (1) cycle, the bearing passes this position
twice - once travelling towards +X and once travelling
towards -X.
We'll begin our sequence of images with the bearing just
passing the '0' point moving towards '+X'.
The red ball (seen at the very ends of the sine wave)
indicates the amplitude level during the cycle.
Measuring "How Much" in Displacement Units
The bearing has just reached the '+X' position and has
stopped momentarily to reverse direction.
Vibration Characteristics:
Frequency
How Often ?
In other words, you must create each database point with a specific
purpose in mind.
Consider a motor driving some component connected with a coupling.
What problems may occur on the motor and what vibration frequencies
will each generate ?
Mechanical influences (unbalance, misalignment, etc.) at 1x, 2x,
and 3x rpm (also be referred to as orders).
Pumps can generate hydraulically-related vibration at the number
of vanes x rpm - vane pass frequency.
Compressors do likewise at lobe pass and vane pass frequencies
(to name only 2 types).
Fans can generate at blade pass frequency.
With rolling element bearings, vibration at 30kcpm - 50 x rpm (up
to 150kcpm) is typically generated during stages leading up to
failure.
Example #1:
A Bearing Vibrates 100 Mils Pk-
Pk @ 30 cpm
Displacement @ 1x Displacement @ 1x
rpm = 100 mils rpm = 2540 um
English Units: Metric Units:
Velocity = Velocity = 0.000052
0.000052 x D x F xDxF
V = 0.000052 x 100 V = 0.000052 x
mils x 30 cpm 2540 um x 30 cpm
V = 0.16 ips V = 4 mm/sec
Acceleration = Acceleration =
0.00027 x V x F 0.0000107 x V x F
A = 0.00027 x 0.16 A = 0.0000107 x 4
x 30 x 30
A = 0.0013 g's A = 0.0013 g's
Failure Likelihood:
Stress = HIGH
Fatigue = Low
Force = None
What unit is best to monitor with at this
frequency ?
Displacement
Example #2:
A Bearing Vibrates 10 Mils Pk-
Pk At 1000 cpm
Displacement @ 1x rpm = 10 Displacement @ 1x rpm = 250
mils um
English Units: Metric Units:
Velocity = 0.000052 x D x F Velocity = 0.000052 x D x F
V = 0.000052 x 10 mils x V = 0.000052 x 250 um x
1000 cpm 1000 cpm
V = 0.52 ips V = 13 mm/sec
Acceleration = 0.00027 x V x Acceleration = 0.0000107 x V
F xF
A = 0.00027 x 0.52 x 1000 A = 0.0000107 x 13 x 1000
A = 0.14 g's A = 0.14 g's
Failure Likelihood:
Stress = MODERATE
Fatigue = MODERATE
Force = None
What unit is best to monitor with at this frequency ?
Velocity
Why not displacement ?
Because it can also be used to monitor higher frequencies on
this machine.
Example #3:
A Bearing Vibrates 3 Mils Pk-Pk At 9,000 cpm
Displacement @ 9,000 cpm = Displacement @ 9,000 cpm =
3 mils 75 um
English Units: Metric Units:
Velocity = 0.000052 x D x F Velocity = 0.000052 x D x F
V = 0.000052 x 3 mils x 9,000 V = 0.000052 x 75 um x 9,000
cpm cpm
V = 1.404 ips V = 35.1 mm/sec
Acceleration = 0.00027 x V x Acceleration = 0.0000107 x V
F xF
A = 0.00027 x 1.404 x 9,000 A = 0.0000107 x 35.1 x 9,000
A = 3.41 g's A = 3.41 g's
Failure Likelihood:
Stress = None
Fatigue = HIGH
Force =Low
What unit is best to monitor with at this frequency ?
Velocity
Example #4:
A Bearing Vibrates 0.2 Mils Pk-Pk At 60,000
cpm
Displacement @ 60,000 cpm Displacement @ 60,000 cpm
=0.2 mils = 5 um
English Units: Metric Units:
Velocity = 0.000052 x D x F Velocity = 0.000052 x D x F
V = 0.000052 x 0.2 mils x V = 0.000052 x 5 um x
60,000 cpm 60,000 cpm
V = 0.62 ips V = 15.6 mm/sec
Acceleration = 0.0000107 x V
Acceleration = 0.00027 x V x F xF
A = 0.00027 x 0.62 x 60,000 A = 0.0000107 x 15.6 x
60,000
A = 10 g's A = 10 g's
Failure Likelihood:
Stress =None
Fatigue =Moderate
Force = Moderate
What unit is best to monitor with at this frequency ?
Velocity or Acceleration
Choice will be determined by what other problems
(frequencies)
need to be monitored for developing problems.
Example #5:
A High Speed Compressor Rotor Shaft
Vibrates 0.003 Mils Pk-Pk At 1,080,000 cpm
Displacement @ 1,080,000
Displacement @ 1,080,000
cpm = 0.077 um
cpm = 0.003 mils
(7.7 millionths of a
(3 millionths of an inch)
centimeter)
English Units: Metric Units:
Velocity = 0.000052 x D x F Velocity = 0.000052 x D x F
V = 0.000052 x 0.003 mils x V = 0.000052 x 0.077 um x
1,080,000 cpm 1,080,000 cpm
V = 0.17 ips V = 4.32 mm/sec
Acceleration = 0.00027 x V x F Acceleration = 0.0000107 x V
xF
A = 0.00027 x 0.17 x A = 0.0000107 x 4.33 x
1,080,000 1,080,000
A = 50 g's A = 50 g's
Failure Likelihood:
Stress = None
Fatigue = Low
Force = REALLY HIGH
What unit is best to monitor with at this frequency ?
Acceleration
General Equipment Amplitude Guidelines:
Before discussing amplitude guidelines it should be clearly
understood that these are only guidelines - a starting point to
begin from. The best vibration analysts get to know the normal
vibration characteristics of their machines and look for
deviation from that norm. The values that follow here are
generally regarded in the categories shown but they are and
should be considered guidelines.
Displacement Units:
All Must know frequency to assess severity. At very
Frequencies: low frequencies, even displacement amplitudes
of 40 or 50 mils pk-pk or even more can be
only moderately harmful to the bearing and the
structural components affected.
Note: The values listed here as guidelines for velocity and
acceleration are 'peak' amplitudes. Equivalent RMS values are
30% lower.
Velocity Units:
Within Frequency Range: 300 - 120,000 cpm
Hard Supports Condition Soft Supports
English Metric Very Good English Metric
< 0.10 < 2.5 < 0.15 <4
in/sec mm/sec in/sec mm/sec
Acceleration Units:
Frequencies: <Below 30kcpm, the problem will be better
30,000 kcpm:monitored with velocity as the amplitude unit
of choice.
Frequencies:Between 30kcpm and 120kcpm, you must
30k-120kcpm:know frequency to fully judge the severity.
Velocity can confidently be used as a partner
unit in this range.
Frequencies: > < 2.00 g's Good
120kcpm:
2.0 - 5.0 g's Fair
5.0 - 10.0 g's Rough
> 10.0 g's Very Rough
Amplitude Guidelines For "Other" Equipment
Types:
Slow Speed: Typically generates lower amplitudes. For shafts
< 300 rpm, Time Domain plots should be used.
Machine Tool or "Precision" equipment: Typically tolerates
much lower amplitude levels. Guidelines (vibration alarms) for
each machine must be established. Since this equipment
usually involves keeping the finish quality within certain
tolerances or specifications, establishing a vibration level just
below which those machines go "out-of-tolerance" can be a
very effective method. Bearings should be monitored
regardless of the overall machine condition.
Complex Vibration Generators: Typically generates higher
amplitude levels: Refers to machines that have large forces
normally or a lot of vibration sources. High pressure, lobe-type
blowers (Roots, for instance) often involve motor frequencies,
belt frequencies, lobe pass frequencies, 2-rotor speeds, gear
frequencies and aerodynamic forces as well as loaded and
unloaded conditions. The resulting vibration patterns can be
high relative to the General Machine amplitude references and
yet normal for your machine. Be careful in over-reacting. At
least one manufacturer's vibration guidelines are as follows:
English Units: in/sec Metric Units: mm/sec Classification:
< 0.45 < 11.4 Excellent
0.45 - 0.90 w / no 11.4 - 22.8 w / no
Good
peak > 0.45 peak > 11.4
0.45 - 0.90 w / 1+ 11.4 - 22.8 w / 1+
Fair
peaks > 0.45 peaks > 11.4
> 0.90 w / no peak > > 22.8 w / no peak >
Rough
0.90 22.8
Peak(s) > 0.90 Peak(s) > 22.8 Very Rough
What Direction ?
Still not clear ?
Phase Angle #1
With the transducer mounted vertically, the peak signal
arrives when the black dot is at the 12:00 position (0°).
The strobe light is set up to flash when an amplitude
peak arrives so it will flash at that moment.
When the strobe flashes, the key shows up at 10:30
(315°).
Phase Angle #2
What has been changed in this animation ?
The transducer is mounted horizontally so the movement
being measured is horizontal only. Another way to say
this would be that the transducer has been moved 90°.
Let's examine each of these facts more closely and see how
they were arrived at from the phase measurements we
recorded.
The transducer
mounted on the right
bearing will cause the
strobe to trigger when
the bearing is at
maximum
displacement to the
left (towards that
transducer). At that
moment, the reference
mark is approaching
the 6:00 position (just
out of sight).
Since they have phase angles 180° different, the
bearings may appear out of phase - but are they?
The bearings are moving in the identical fashion as the
previous page and we established they are 'in-phase'.
The difference is the transducer orientation. It must be
accounted for in the final readings.
Y-Axis Data:
Amplitude
X-Axis Data:
Time (typically days or months)
X-Axis Units:
Time (seconds or milliseconds)
The time domain is more difficult to analyze than the next plot
we will discuss - the "Spectrum" - but under certain conditions
it can provide insights and information not available on the
spectrum plot.
Y-Axis
Units:
Amplitude
X-Axis Units:
Frequency (cpm or Hz)
Y-Axis
Units:
Amplitude
X-Axis Units:
Frequency (cpm or Hz)
An 'Enveloping Spectrum' plot is identical to a
conventional spectrum in the way it displays data:
amplitude vs. frequency.
However, there is a significant difference in the way the
raw data is processed.
Whereas conventional FFT processing extracts simple
sinusoids from complex motion, enveloping spectrum
signal processing looks for transient (instantaneous)
impacts - the "striking" action discussed earlier versus
the "pushing" action the FFT works well with.
These impacts do not usually survive the conventional
FFT process and therefore are kept hidden from the
analyst.
However, knowledge of the frequency of these impacts
provides extremely important information towards proper
diagnosis of machinery problems at an earlier stage than
would be possible with conventional FFT analysis.
Practical Definition:
The 'Overall' Amplitude is the sum of all of the vibration
energy occurring between 0 cpm and the data collector's
maximum frequency (its "Fmax" - well over 1,000kcpm).
In other words, if you were to collect a spectrum over a
frequency range of 0 - collector's Fmax and added all of
the amplitude peaks together, that would be your
'overall' amplitude. Although not technically correct, that
is one way to look at it.
Technical Definition:
Consider again collecting a spectrum from 0 - the
collector's Fmax. Take every amplitude value, square it,
add them together and take the square root of that sum.
Although not exactly perfectly accurate, that is closer to
what actually goes into calculating an 'overall' amplitude.
That is known as a "Root Mean Square", or RMS, value.
All data is collected as an "RMS" value. That is an ISO
convention and applies no matter what collector you may
have.
o Due to that,
the trend
amplitude value
is calculated by
simply
multiplying the
peak amplitude
by 0.707.
But some analysts prefer to display the amplitudes as a 'peak'
amplitude (usually because the vibration severity charts they are
using are in peak amplitude values). So how is that value
calculated ?
To calculate the 'Peak' amplitude, we divide the RMS value by
0.707.
For those of you paying close attention, you may have noticed
that, from start to finish, the way a peak amplitude is
calculated is:
o Measure the peak amplitude.
o Multiply by 0.707 to obtain the RMS value.
o Divide by 0.707 to obtain the Peak value.
Transducers
A vibration transducer is the instrument that measures or
senses the vibration and is commonly referred to as a pickup
or sensor. The basic understanding and proper selection of an
appropriate transducer is important. This text will not deal in
extensive detail with all the different types and technical
characteristics of transducers but will attempt only to provide
a basic understanding of the important aspects. There are
basically three types of transducers commonly used. They
are:
Accelerometer
Velocity Transducer
Displacement Transducer
Transducers:
Accelerometers
Accelerometers are by far the most common and versatile
types of transducers in use. The seismic, or piezoelectric,
accelerometer produces a output charge when held against a
vibrating surface due to the characteristics of the piezoelectric
disks that are inside the transducer. These transducers
contain no moving parts and as such are quite rugged. The
charge that is generated through the compression and
expansion of the piezoelectric disks is proportional to the
amount of vibration acceleration (force).
Generated voltage is very small -
most models have built in hi-gain
electronic amplifiers.
Output charge is proportional
acceleration force accelerometer is
exposed to.
Accelerometers are the only
transducer capable of reliably
measuring high frequency vibration
that is related to problems such as
bearing defects and gear problems.
Accelerometers have fair to poor
accuracy at low frequencies where
acceleration amplitudes can become
One Design of a
quite small even in the presence of Piezoelectric
high displacement amplitudes. Accelerometer
Some are somewhat susceptible to
radio frequency interference
Some can have problems with
thermal growth (putting the
transducer on a very hot bearing)
which can cause false amplitude
values at low frequencies unless
they are given time to thermally
stabilize.
Transducers:
Velocity
There are two primary types of velocity transducers, the
moving coil type and the piezoelectric type.
Moving Coil Type -
Internally is made up
of a coil supported by
springs and a
permanently fixed
magnet.
Coil movement
relative to the
magnet generates a
voltage proportional
to the velocity of that
movement. Moving Coil Velocity Transducer
Generally require no
output signal
amplifiers.
They are larger than other types of transducers.
They are not reliable for low frequency measurements
without the use of a correction factor because the coil
tends to follow the magnet at low frequencies.
Balancing at lower frequencies ok since the relative
amplitudes recorded will be consistent.
Transducers:
Displacement
Generally known as
proximity probes, these
transducers are limited in
application but where
applicable they are
extremely useful and
important. They are
generally used where a Proximity Probe
smooth running rotor is
very critical. For instance,
turbines in power plants
will have permanently
mounted proximity probes
monitoring turbine
movement and possibly
phase. High speed
compressor rotors are
another example of a
machine that will almost
always be monitored with
proximity probes.
Does not actually touch the shaft or bearing - it is
mounted an exact distance from a clean, smooth area of
the shaft and fixed in place.
Externally applied high-frequency carrier signal emits a
magnetic field from a coil in the tip of the probe towards
the shaft.
The shaft absorbs some of the magnetic energy present.
The closer the shaft to the magnetic field source, the
more it absorbs. The more magnetic energy it absorbs,
the more it uses up the carrier signal and reduces the
carrier signal strength.
The further away the shaft is from the probe, the less it
absorbs. The less magnetic energy it absorbs, the less it
uses up the carrier signal and the higher the carrier
signal strength remains.
The probe produces 2 signals:
o AC signal proportional to the vibration (shaft
movement).
o DC signal proportional to the size of the gap.
Database Setup:
Purpose of a Monitoring Program
What is the purpose of a vibration monitoring program ? Well,
the operative word is “monitoring”. The purpose is to monitor
the vibration levels. This means collecting data that will alert
you to any developing problems while not over-burdening you
with collecting overly detailed or excessive amounts of data. A
monitoring program is not intended nor is able to do is allow
for specific diagnose of every problem that arises while sitting
behind your computer.
To be sure, a well designed vibration monitoring program will
nearly always give you a specific direction in which to search
for a problem and it will help you prioritize work by gauging
the severity and source of most of the problems you will
encounter. However, further analysis, or at the very least
confirmation checks, are always a wise course of action to take
before proceeding with any corrective actions.
Database Setup:
Selecting Point Parameters
As an example let us look at a simple AC motor. The details
surrounding each of the frequencies we have to monitor are
found in the "Troubleshooting Charts" (accessed from the main
menu). The question we will address is - what are the different
potential problems we need to be looking for:
Frequency(s) to
Explanation
monitor
1x, 2x, 3x rpm Running speed harmonics
2x AC Line Frequency Torque Pulse Frequency (variation in motor
air gap)
1x, 2x, 3x Rotor Bar Pass Electrically related frequencies equal to the
Frequency (RBPF) number of rotor bars or winding
or Winding Slot Pass slots x rpm. These can reveal certain
Frequency (WSPF) electrical problems and/or conditions.
30kcpm - 120kcpm Frequency range in which symptoms of
rolling element bearing defects usually show
up initially.
So the questions are - what are the Fmax's, how many lines of
resolution should be used, what amplitude units should we
use, what is the best way to analyze the data and basically,
how can we make our database work for us as efficiently as
possible ? How can the need for occasional high resolution
readings be squared with the need to monitor relatively high
frequencies ? Accuracy vs. speed of data collection.
Database Setup:
Selecting Point Parameters
The solution, of course, is that several different measurements
must be taken at each position with each one addressing one
or a few specific problem areas (and hence a specific
frequency range).
Mechanically Caused Vibrations
A complete protection set-up would collect a reading
horizontally and verticallyon each bearing plus one axial
reading on position 2 with an Fmax of 120000 cpm in
order to monitor potential bearing defects developing and
the common problems occurring at 1x, 2x and 3x rpm.
That's five readings.
Bearing Protection:
An enveloping spectrum should also be taken on each
bearing to check for any frequencies at which impacts are
occurring. That's two more readings. What you are left
with is this:
However, let's get back to the word monitoring - as in a
monitoring program. You could, depending on the proactivity
of the program personnel, eliminate a few of the readings and
rely on the others to tip you off that something is wrong. You
could then go into full-blown anaysis mode and collect lots of
data. Using that logic, the readings could be divided into
"necessary" and "optional" readings as follows:
Necessary
Database Setup:
How Much Data is Enough ?
So you see that a simple AC motor may require as many as
nine separate spectra in order to catch all the potential
problems that may develop on it. The driven component as
many or more. How do you collect all of this data ? More
importantly, how do you analyze all the data you've collected
in an efficient yet productive way ? That is the main problem.
Of course, some problems are much more likely to develop
than others and a reduction in the number of readings may be
unavoidable in order to decrease data collection and analysis
time.
As with many other maintenance or management decisions,
trade-offs between time and accuracy of information must be
made.
Good news: The more readings you have, the more
information you will have, the more protection you will
have, etc.
Bad news: The more readings you take, the longer your
data collections will take, the longer your analyses will
take and the more paperwork you will have.
Database Setup:
Trading Time Versus Accuracy
There is one good arguument against bothering to collect the
two special electrical readings:
Electrical problems are often apparent through means
other than a velocity spectrum. Many problems, including
high 2x line frequency and broken/cracked rotor bar
problems, will almost always cause an audible, pulsing
hum in the motor that anyone can notice without
vibration equipment.
Database Setup:
An Example Of An Effective Database Setup
The exact nature of your database setup and the specifics
must be addressed according to the vendor you purchased
your software from. Most programs fail because usable,
worthwhile data can not be extracted from the database. Why
does this happen ? The software usually has certain useful
features such as reporting capabilities that can be accessed - if
the database is created in such a way as to not only take
advantage but to make the best use of those features.
By way of a single example - and their are numerous ways to
set up a database - the service company Vibe-Assist looked at
two ingredients that went into the collection and analysis of
data - what information they wanted vs. what the reporting
capability of the software was (Entek's Odyssey™) - and came
up with database setup templates that are used for creating an
effective database structure that uses software features of
Odyssey to provide information we want. By generating a
database structure that takes maximum advantage of a
powerful software reporting feature, Vibe-Assist reduced their
analysis time by an incredible 80% or so. This new database
structure did not generate this huge improvement by reducing
machinery protection or analysis accuracy. On the contrary,
the new setup improved the reliability of the analysis and
improved the level of protection possessed by the machines
they monitor. In order to illustrate the value of an effective
database setup, Vibe-Assist has agreed to share a few of their
component setups along with an explanation of the logic
behind the database structure. Shown below are examples of a
direct drive, 4-bearing machine and a belt-drive, 4-bearing
machine. The links below under the "Type" of reading will take
you to explanation pages for each of the readings.
Direct Drives
Belt Drives
Explanation of Readings
Sample Report
Direct
Drive
Bearing 1
# of
Reading Type Max Freq Units Direction
Lines
Trend &
1 30kcpm 800 velocity horiz
Spectrum
120kcpm
Trend &
2 - or - 800 acceleration horiz
Spectrum
60kcpm*
Trend &
5 240x rpm 800 acceleration horiz
Spectrum
* - For the acceleration spectrum, use 120kcpm for machine speeds over
1200 rpm and 60kcpm below that.
Direct
Drive
Bearing 2
# of
Reading Type Max Freq Units Direction
Lines
Trend &
1 12kcpm 1600 velocity horiz
Spectrum
120kcpm
Trend &
2 - or - 800 acceleration horiz
Spectrum
60kcpm*
Direct
Drive
Bearings 3
&4
# of
Reading Type Max Freq Units Direction
Lines
Trend &
1 30kcpm 800 velocity horiz
Spectrum
120kcpm
Trend &
2 - or - 800 acceleration horiz
Spectrum
60kcpm*
5-9
revolutions or acceleration
2048
4 Time Domain horiz
bytes
relevant or velocity
period
* - For the acceleration spectrum, use 120kcpm for machine speeds over
1200 rpm and 60kcpm below that.
Top
Belt Drives
Explanation of Readings
Sample Report
Belt Drive
Bearing
#1
# of
Reading Type Max Freq Units Direction
Lines
Trend &
1 12kcpm 800 velocity horiz
Spectrum
120kcpm
Trend &
2 - or - 800 acceleration horiz
Spectrum
60kcpm*
Trend &
5 240x rpm 800 acceleration horiz
Spectrum
* - For the acceleration spectrum, use 120kcpm for machine speeds over
1200 rpm and 60kcpm below that.
Belt Drive
Bearing
#2
# of
Reading Type Max Freq Units Direction
Lines
Trend &
1 12kcpm 1600 velocity horiz
Spectrum
120kcpm
Trend &
2 - or - 800 acceleration horiz
Spectrum
60kcpm*
Belt Drive
Bearings 3
&4
# of
Reading Type Max Freq Units Direction
Lines
Trend &
1 6kcpm 800 velocity horiz
Spectrum
120kcpm
Trend &
2 - or - 800 acceleration horiz
Spectrum
60kcpm*
5-9
revolutions or acceleration
2048
4 Time Domain horiz
bytes
relevant or velocity
period
* - For the acceleration spectrum, use 120kcpm for machine speeds over
1200 rpm and 60kcpm below that.
Top
Direct Drives
Belt Drives
Sample Report
Explanation of Readings
There are numerous other component setups in the templates -
these are for generic, rolling element bearing machines running at
normal speed (1000 - 3600 rpm). But this seems like an extreme
amount of data - how does this help with analysis ? Well, first, each
reading has a specific job to do:
Reading 1: Velocity Trend - Tool that is sensitive to fluctuation
(increase) in low - mid frequency ranges where mechanical
problems develop (1x - 5x rpm) and, to a lesser degree,
higher frequency problems such as rolling element bearings.
Reading 1: Velocity Spectrum - Analysis tool for low - mid
frequency problems. Higher resolution readings collected on
belt drives and inboard motor bearings.
o Note: By properly setting some simple statistical alarms
on the trend plot, this spectrum may be turned off
because the analyst will be alerted by the overall alarm
to any situation where a spectrum is required and
eliminate many of these most time consuming readings.
Reading 2: Acceleration Trend - Tool that is not affected by
influences at 1x - 5x rpm but is increasingly sensitive to
problems developing above 30kcpm such as gears, bearings
and high frequency electrical. Another good candidate for
statistical alarms.
Reading 2: Acceleration Spectrum - Analysis tool for high
frequency problem detection and analysis. Used in conjunction
with the next reading . . .
Reading 3: Envelope Spectrum - e.g. gSE, ESP, Peakvue, HFB
and more. This plot gives information on transient impacts
occurring that may be related to a bearing defect or several
other sources.
Reading 4: Time Domain - Can be de-activated if the analyst
prefers but is an important tool to use at times. Can be set to
whatever time sample the analyst chooses.
Reading 5: Acceleration Spectrum - On motors only, looks for
2x and 3x rotor bar pass frequency and winding slot pass
frequency - very high frequencies.
Top
Direct Drives
Belt Drives
Explanation of Readings
Sample Report
The key, however, is in the simple reports that can be run. An
amplitude threshold is set for the report (perhaps 0.2 in/sec or 5
mm/sec). A line is triggered for the report for every single peak
that exceeds the pre-set amplitude threshold. The line on the
report, shown below, includes all the location information, the
Fmax, peak amplitude and frequency of the peak as well as the rpm
and date. This makes initial review of the data simple and brief.
This report addresses the low-mid frequency ranges that require
velocity units for effective monitoring (> 30kcpm). This is the
frequency range in which mechanical problems will show up: 1x -
10x rpm or so. This report does not address bearings, gears,
certain electrical vibrations or any other high frequency vibration
sources.
Database Setup:
Summary
The creation of a database, with all the associated decisions
that must be made, is a job that requires a very good technical
understanding of vibration analysis, machinery operational
characteristics and good doses of common sense. Always
question what you are doing, especially whether or not the
desired goals are being achieved and, if not, what other
methods might be used to achieve those goals.
The database setup shown on the previous page that Vibe-
Assist is successful with was not presented as an example of
the only way a database can be setup. It was included only as
an example of a setup that is known to provide high levels of
protection while being simple to manage and easy to analyze -
three very important aspects. There are certainly other
database structures that are successful. No matter the
database setup, the individuals involved are of crucial
importance; the machines, the maintenance environment and
numerous other factors also affect the success. However, the
importance of the task of setting up a database cannot be
overstated. Although doing it properly does not guarantee
success, doing it improperly guarantees failure. There are
many variables to consider and options to choose from.
The particular database setup we've just gone through utilizes
a strength of the Odyssey™ software - the ability to generate
a report with the specific information we wanted. Your
software may or may not have that ability. You may need or
want to focus on some other strength of your software (since
it is the key determining factor in what database setup will
work for you). The database is comprehensive yet manageable
and scaleable to the user's needs. If you have Odyssey™
software and are struggling with your database setup, feel free
to copy the database setup laid out above and customize the
report as you saw on the previous page. You can also, for a
small fee, obtain the templates (including the different
components, a written manual the reports, etc.) directly from
Vibe-Assist.
Plots:
Trends
X-Axis Units:
Time (typically days or months)
Practical Definition:
The 'Overall' Amplitude is the sum of all of the vibration
energy occurring between 0 cpm and the data collector's
maximum frequency (its "Fmax" - well over 1,000kcpm).
In other words, if you were to collect a spectrum over a
frequency range of 0 - collector's Fmax and added all of
the amplitude peaks together, that would be your
'overall' amplitude. Although not technically correct, that
is one way to look at it.
Technical Definition:
Consider again collecting a spectrum from 0 - the
collector's Fmax. Take every amplitude value, square it,
add them together and take the square root of that sum.
Although not exactly perfectly accurate, that is closer to
what actually goes into calculating an 'overall' amplitude.
That is known as a "Root Mean Square", or RMS, value.
All data is collected as an "RMS" value. That is an ISO
convention and applies no matter what collector you may
have.
o Due to that,
the trend
amplitude value
is calculated by
simply
multiplying the
peak amplitude
by 0.707.
But some analysts prefer to display the amplitudes as a 'peak'
amplitude (usually because the vibration severity charts they are
using are in peak amplitude values). So how is that value
calculated ?
To calculate the 'Peak' amplitude, we divide the RMS value by
0.707.
For those of you paying close attention, you may have noticed
that, from start to finish, the way a peak amplitude is
calculated is:
o Measure the peak amplitude.
o Multiply by 0.707 to obtain the RMS value.
o Divide by 0.707 to obtain the Peak value.
Analyzing A Trend
Analyzing a trend is not typically a difficult thing to do . . .
providing you know what it is you are trending.
Are you trending high frequency vibration ?
Not if you only use displacement.
Are you trending the typical, general equipment speed
ranges of 1000 - 3600 rpm and associated mechanical
problems.
Not with displacement or acceleration - only with
velocity.
Are you trending very low frequency vibration - below
100 rpm, for instance ?
Plots:
The FFT (The Spectrum)
What Is An FFT (Spectrum) Plot
Y-Axis
Units:
Amplitude
X-Axis Units:
Frequency (number of cycles per minute or per second)
Whereas a Trend is amplitude values versus time, a
"Spectrum" Plot is amplitude versus frequency.
A spectrum, a.k.a. an "FFT", allows you to assess
severity (with the amplitude) and helps identify the
source (with the frequency).
FFT Tools
Vibration spectra provides important clues to machine
problems. There are tools provided in all software packages
that help with this analysis. The most important are:
Moveable Cursor - A "base" cursor that can be moved
to any frequency and identifies the amplitude at that
frequency.
Harmonic Cursors - Activating this tool creates
additional cursors (as many as are required) that
appear at integer multiples of the base cursor. If the
base cursor is located at 1x rpm, harmonics will appear
at 2x, 3x, 4x, etc. This is the most important analysis
tool available. All harmonic cursors are at higher
frequencies than the base cursor.
Sideband Cursors - Activating this tool creates
additional cursors at frequencies to either side of the
base cursor. If the 1st (closest) sideband cursors are
located 50 cpm to either side of the base cursor,
additional sideband cursors (as many as required) will
each be located an additional 50 cpm away. For
instance, the 2nd sideband cursors will be 100 cpm
away from the base cursor, the 3rd will be 150 cpm
away, etc.
These three tools are sufficient for the beginner and for 99%
of most analyses. There are, of course, other useful tools
such as " "labels" and frequency groups but that is more
vendor specific and should be learned in a software class and
through experience.
Remember, ALL spectral analysis is limited in its use
and accuracy by the spectrum resolution.
The reasons for this lie in what the FFT process actually does
and what factors influence its output (the spectrum).
Fmax
Spectrum Resolution =
Number
of Lines
Close-up Look At FFT Plot Shows Individual, Frequency-Based
Amplitudes
With Straight Lines Connecting The Dots
The FFT shown here displays data from 0 - 120kcpm. You have
made the judgement that one of the peaks shown in the low-
mid frequency range (1800-7200 cpm in this case) is
excessive. How reliably can you answer the following
questions:
What is the source of the vibration at 1,800 cpm ?
Obvious choice - 1x rpm: Since it is a direct drive
machine and we will make the assumption that there is
no other vibration feeding into this machine from
another, you have a very good probability of being right
(note that it is not a 100% probability) if you say that
peak is the vibration 1x rpm.
The FFT shown here displays data from 0 - 60kcpm. You have
made the judgement that one of the peaks shown in the low-
mid frequency range (1800-7200 cpm in this case) is
excessive. How reliably can you answer the following
questions:
What is the source of the vibration at 1,800 cpm ?
Obvious choice - Still 1x rpm: Since it is a direct drive
machine and we will make the assumption that there is
no other vibration feeding into this machine from
another, you have a very good probability of being right
(note that it is not a 100% probability) if you say that
peak is the vibration 1x rpm.
The FFT shown here displays data from 0 - 12kcpm but with
1600 lines of resolution instead of the 400 lines each of the
previous FFTs contained. How reliably can you answer the
following questions:
What is the source of the vibration at 1,800 cpm ?
Obvious Choice - Still 1x rpm: Notice that the frequencies
listed have changed. Now that each line of resolution is
only 7.5 cpm wide (12000/1600), the accuracy of the
frequencies displayed has improved as well. As the
resolution improves, the likelihood that the peak is 1x
rpm continues to improve but will never reach a 100%
certainty.
The FFT shown here displays data from 0 - 3.6kcpm. You have
made the judgement that one of the peaks specifically in this
"mechanical" range (dealing with rpm's) we are looking at is
excessive. Because you have sufficient resolution, you can now
incorporate the "process of elimination" into your thought
processes (when a source becomes the only logical possibility).
How reliably can you answer the following questions:
What is the source of any of the vibrations apparent in the
<3.6kcpm range ?
Much Clearer Than Before: Knowing that mechanical
vibrations occur only at exact multiples (harmonics) of
running speed (including 1x), we now have a much more
reliable assumption than with the e following:
o 907 cpm - 1x Fan (high likelihood)
o 1177 cpm - 2x Belts (high likelihood simply via
process of elimination)
o 1770 cpm - Three separate mechanical vibrations
had previously combined to form this peak. Because
of the new spectrum resolution of 7.5 cpm/line,
they are now separated on the FFT once you zoom-
in on that portion of the plot. Now they can be
judged for cause and severity and what might have
mistakenly been called motor unbalance (1x motor)
can correctly be called belt problems (3x belt typical
frequency generated by belt problems - could be
wear, resonance, etc.) along with possibly some
mechanical looseness on the fan (2x fan typical
frequency generated by looseness around the fan
bearings and/or the surrounding structure).The
three are:
3x Belts is the highest amplitude of the three.
2x Fan is the second highest amplitude of the
three.
1x Motor is by far the lowest of the three.
o 2340 cpm - 4x Belts (high likelihood by process of
elimination)
o 2700 cpm - 3x Fan (high likelihood by process of
elimination)
o 3540 cpm - 2x Motor (probable - 4x Fan and 6x
Belts could also be affecting this peak although the
probability is pretty low for either of those). Most
likely - 2x Motor.
Why 1/3 ?
It means that there will be at least TWO lines of
resolution between the frequencies in question.
Y-Axis
Units:
Amplitude
X-Axis Units:
Frequency (cpm or Hz)
Figura 1 Figura 2
The difficulty lies in the fact that the FFT will have to
mathematically account for the fact that the spike
suddenly appears, briefly rings down and then is gone
until the next impact occurs. It is not a constant
sinusoid, it is transient.
2) The "impact" frequency (based on the period between
impacts).
The impact frequency itself has no sinusoidal motion
associated with it. In other words, there is no sine wave
that connects the start of one impact to the start of the
next impact - they are individual 'events' that occur.
These impacts (spikes) are specifically what the
enveloping signal processing looks for and measures.
But where do the peaks between 31,000 and 65,000 cpm come
from ? How does the FFT process come to "see" them ?
Figure 4
When the signal shown in Figure 1 is put through the FFT
process, that process is asked "what simple sinusoids create
that exact periodic signal".
The process "sees" the series of sine waves shown in
Figure 4 as the mathematical solution to the question.
Note the varying amplitude values of the sinusoids in
Figure 4.
Note the three instants (65-66 msecs, 76-77 msecs and
87-88 msecs) all of the high frequency signals are in
phase (adding together).
Since the FFT is based on the principle that any periodic signal
can be broken down into a series of simple sinusoids, there
must be some combination of sinusoids that would produce a
sudden spike followed by a subsequent "ringdown" (high)
frequency followd by nothing until the next spike occurs.
What would the signal look like if we only used the above 7
signals (plus some background noise and amplitude
modulations) ? See for yourself:
Figure 1
The result is only impacts and background noise.
What is happening is that this combination of signals will
all come into phase with one another at about the same
time, rings down to the noise level in about 4 msecs as
the signals go out-of-phase with one another and
remains at background noise level for another 6-7 msecs.
The result is a large, brief amplitude increase (a spike, or
impact) every 11 msecs or so. That equals an impact
frequency of 5,400 cpm (the difference between the
frequencies).
Of course, the FFT does not have the benefit of knowing which
sinusoids went into generating this signal. In fact, that is
exactly it's job - to calculate those simple sinusoids from the
complex signal (including other influences like 1x rpm, other
mechanical vibrations, amp and freq modulation, etc.). So the
process is:
The above signal is fed into the FFT process. That process
then calculates what simple sinusoids combined to
generate the signal.
The FFT can deduce that there is a combination of sines
and cosines (signals) that will result in the above
complex signal - the combination listed.
Adding or removing any signals that are a multiple of
5,400 will alter the appearance by making the impact
either sharper (more signals) or less well defined (less
signals).
In fact, there is only one solution to each signal - only
one set of simple sinusoids.
The bearing defect frequency identified is just over 3x RPM. Notice that
there are no significant peaks at 1x, 2x or 3x rpm on Figure 1 (there
were on the velocity spectrum). There are, however, extremely
significant peaks at 1x, 2x and 3x the impact frequency - in this case a
bearing defect frequency (there are other impact sources). The
enveloping signal provides the following:
Summary
What Is A "Time Domain" Plot ?
Y-Axis
Units:
Amplitude
X-Axis Units:
Time (seconds or milliseconds)
X-Axis Units:
Time (seconds or milliseconds)
X-Axis Units:
Time (seconds or milliseconds)
Y-Axis
Units:
Amplitude
X-Axis Units:
Time (seconds or milliseconds)
Y-Axis
Units:
Amplitude
X-Axis Units:
Time (seconds or milliseconds)
Resonance
The FFT looks like thsi when applied to the signal shown
above. Why ?
So what does the FFT "see" ? This plot was generated from the
signal in Figure 1:
Note that the phase relationships are not displayed on the FFT
- it only displays amplitudes and frequencies although the FFT
process does use phase in its analysis.
So this "distorted" signal shape:
You can see a low frequency cycle (occurring 15 times over the
time sample) and a high frequency (occurring many times for
each of the low frequency cycles). One way to describe this is
as "a high frequency riding a low frequency". For analysis, let's
zoom in:
Figure 2 shows only just over one of the low frequency cycles
(one peak to just past the next peak). The high frequency
could be a gear meshing frequency. The low frequency is at 1x
rpm. How many teeth are on the gear ? This is another
advantage of using time domain on gearboxes - you can
actually obtain detailed internal information that you can only
guess at on the spectrum. Count the small peaks from the top
of one low frequency peak to the next. There are 23 teeth.
What does the spectrum look like ?
Figure 3 - The Resulting FFT
You can see the low frequency (usually 1x rpm) cycle still
occurring but this shape looks somewhat like an Angel Fish.
This shape is typical of an amplitude modulation. Let's zoom in
on the computer generated signal to get a clearer picture of
what is happening.
Figure 3
Figure 3 shows only a bit more than a single one of the low
frequency cycles. It is clear that the high frequency signal (the
gear mesh amplitude) is increasing and decreasing in
amplitude at a rate of once per shaft revolution. Figure 4
shows the two signals involved separated:
Figure 4
Figure 5
We've been hasty again. It is now clear that the gears are
also binding momentarily as they go in and out of mesh -
perhaps they are incorrectly aligned (note that the seemingly
straight green line shown in Figure 4 is actually a small
portion of the 1x rpm signal). The gold signal shows about 3-
1/2 cycles of the gear mesh signal. Clearly, the slope of the
gear mesh signal is steeper in the positive going direction
than in the negative going direction - more frequency
modulation but this frequency modulation is for the gear mesh
signal. Now let's look at the resultant FFT:
Figure 5 - The FFT Generated From Figure 1
We have:
1x, 2x, 3x rpm peaks
1x, 2x, 3x gear mesh frequency peaks
Sidebands around gear mesh frequency harmonics
spaced at 1x rpm
These are only some of the most likely problems but you will
most probably find the problem during the course of this
investigation. Also, consider that we are assuming with our list
here that it is not just one or two of the amplitudes to be
excessive but all of them. That is quite unlikely.
You are far more likely to be mislead by spectrums if you are
ignorant
of the FFT process than if you have a proper understanding of
it.
Figure 1
Figure 2
We can see from Figure 2 that the beat is occurring over about
4000 msecs (4 seconds) which means it is occurring 15 times
per minute. With a beat frequency such as this, chances are
you would be able to hear and/or feel the beat occurring. By
timing it, you can find the 'beat' rate (15 beats per minute).
From the 'Frequency' section, we know that we need a
spectrum resolution of about 1/3 of that beat - 5 - 6 cpm/line
of resolution - to be able to separate the peaks on the FFT.
Notice the lack of any peak near the impact (defect) frequency
(about 3.1 x rpm).
The use of time domain for bearing defects is particularly
useful for slow speed equipment. A spectrum will often provide
no warning or very late warning of a defect developing.
Please note that this subject is covered far more in-depth in
the 'Enveloping Spectra Plots' section.
The spectrum shown goes out to about 22,000 and the number
of teeth is 25. The amplitude at 30,000 cpm (GMF - which is
not shown on the plot) is increased on slightly under this
circumstance. So what is the FFT symptom you can expect
with this problem ? The time plot shows a peak amplitude for
for the 1x rpm signal of perhaps 0.8 ips (20 mm/s). The FFT
amplitude is under 0.5 ips (12 mm/s). There may be a slight
increase in GMF.
Just as impacts in a bearing excite the natural frequencies of
the bearing structure, there will almost certainly be some
excitation of the gear train's natural frequency due to the
impacting. That is an important clue and typical of excessive
wear or impacting between gears but unfortunately you won't,
in all likelihood, know what that natural frequency is. Therefore
...
The only effective way to detect this problem from its early
stages is with time domain analysis.
Figure 1
In case you aren't quite sure yet, let's sum up what we can see from
the wave shape:
The '+' peak amplitude = 1
The '-' peak amplitude = - 0.2
The wave is 'cut off' (truncated) on the bottom.
There is a little bounce or bump at the bottom.
Let's take a look at the FFT generated by the signal in Fig. 1 in case
you would like that to help with your analysis:
The FFT shows a peak at 1x rpm (about 1800 cpm) and 2x rpm
(about 3600 cpm). There is nothing at higher frequencies.
Perhaps the animation on the next page will help.
FIGURA 3
Figure 1 Figure 2
The plot shown in Figure 1 - an actual, real-life time domain plot
- was collected with 2048 amplitude values (the time domain
equivalent of "lines of resolution"). The length of the time sample
is 0.114 secs.
Figure 2 shows a portion of the same time domain plot with the
sample reduced to 0.04 seconds (by zooming in). This is done in
the same manner as one would zoom in a an FFT. It still looks
pretty good but just as with a spectrum, zooming in has done
nothing to improve the accuracy of the data. Once collected, you
can never improve or in any way change the accuracy of any plot
- time domain or spectrum. The resolution is dictated by the
parameters set up and cannot be altered after the fact.
Figure 3 shows the same plot with the sample reduced to only
0.01 seconds. It is now quite clear that the time domain plot is
generated by compiling a series of amplitude values and
connecting them with lines - the same way an FFT is generated.
This is JUST AS IMPORTANT and must be stressed just as much
as with the spectrum. Zooming in to this level does nothing to
improve the resolution and is about as helpful in viewing the big
picture as looking at a forest with your face 2 inches from a
particular tree would be - in other words, not helpful at all.
So how do we set up a time domain reading using FFT
parameters from this information ?
If you want 1600 lines with the same length time sample, you
would use:
Fmax = 1600 / 0.1 seconds = 16,000 Hz x 60 = 960,000
cpm
If you want 400 lines with the same length time sample, you
would use:
Fmax = 400 / 0.1 = 4,000 Hz x 60 = 240,000 cpm
Note that you can generate the Fmax in cpm directly by using
the # lines x 60 and dividing it by the desired time sample:
800 lines x 60 / 0.1 seconds = 48,000 / 0.1 = 480,000
cpm
Also note that the shorter the time sample desired or greater
the resolution, the higher the Fmax selected.
However, there are many people who would argue that time
domain is a valuable tool on all applications and we cannot
argue with them - the wave shape can provide information
that you will not get from an FFT. If you are comfortable with it
and have the time to collect it, by all means - it is another way
to look at how your machines are behaving.
We also cannot argue with the people who claim:
Time Domain is complicated
Time Domain is difficult to interpret
Often you can't make head nor tail of a time domain plot
PRACTICE