Coiled Tubing Drilling Manual

Sound Coiled-Tubing Drilling Practices
Final Report
(February – August 2001)
Prepared for:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE
Prepared by:
Mr. Thomas Williams
Mr. Greg Deskins
MAURER TECHNOLOGY INC.
2916 West T.C. Jester
Houston, Texas
Mr. Stephen L. Ward

ADVANTAGE ENERGY SERVICES LTD.
Mr. Mel Hightower

Consulting Engineer
TR01-21
September 2001
Disclaimer
This report was prepared as an account of work

sponsored by agencies of the United States Government.
Neither the United States Government nor any agency
thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty,
express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or
responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or
usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or
process disclosed, or represents that its use would not
infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any
specific commercial product, process, or service by trade
name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not
necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement,
recommendation, or favoring by the United States
Government or any agency thereof. The views and
opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily
state or reflect those of the United States Government or
any agency thereof.
All applicable federal, state and local governmental rules,

regulations or restrictions, now in effect or which my be
promulgated, take precedence over the suggestions in
this manual. No suggested method, practice, precaution
or program set forth in this guide shall be deemed to
establish a legal standard of conduct or a legal duty, the
violation of which would constitute negligence of any
degree in any legal proceeding.
- ii - Sound CTD Practices

Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the support and contributions

of the project managers from the Minerals Management
Service (Bill Hauser) and the Department of Energy (Roy
Long).
A significant volume of technical data was contributed to

this manual by Maurer Technology from technical reports
and other deliverables of the DEA-67 joint-industry project
on coiled-tubing and slim-hole operations.
The authors also appreciate the contributions of John

Misselbrook of BJ Services, who reviewed the draft
manual and provided a variety of very useful comments.
- iii - Sound CTD Practices

Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1
1.1 Organization of the Manual................................. 1
1.2 Basic Procedure for CTD .................................... 2
2. PRE-JOB PLANNING – ENGINEERING .................... 4
2.1 Overview of Engineering Analysis ...................... 4
2.2 Introduction to CTD ............................................. 5
2.3 Initial Well Research and Planning ..................... 6
2.3.1 Well Research 7
2.3.2 Well Planning 8
2.4 Well and Site Preparation ................................... 9
2.5 CTD Surface Equipment ..................................... 9
2.5.1 Coiled-Tubing Equipment ................... 10
2.5.1.1 CT String .......................... 10
2.5.1.2 CT Injector Head .............. 12
2.5.1.3 CT Reel ............................ 13
2.5.1.4 CT Power Pack ................ 15
2.5.1.5 Crane and Substructure ... 15
2.5.1.6 Pipe-Handling Equipment 16
2.5.2 Well-Control Equipment ...................... 17
2.5.2.1 Well-Control Equipment
Testing. ............................ 20
2.5.2.2 Well-Control Procedures
and Responsibilities ......... 20
2.5.3 Ancillary Surface Equipment............... 21
2.5.4 Monitoring and Recording Equipment 22
2.5.4.1 CTU Monitoring Equipment22
2.5.4.2 Drilling Fluid Monitoring
Equipment ........................ 22
2.5.4.3 Wellbore Steering and
Navigation......................... 23
2.5.4.4 Formation Evaluation ....... 23
2.5.5 Safety and Emergency Equipment ..... 23
2.6 Directional Planning .......................................... 23
2.7 Drilling Fluids and Wellbore Hydraulics ............ 25
2.7.1 Hole Cleaning and Annular Velocity ... 29
2.7.2 Hydraulics Program............................. 30
2.8 Window Milling .............................................. 31
2.9 Open-Hole Logging ........................................... 33
2.10 Wellbore Tubulars and Wellheads .................... 33
2.10.1 Wellheads ........................................... 35
2.10.1.1 New Well .......................... 35
2.10.1.2 Re-entry Well.................... 36
2.11 Liner Cementing .............................................. 37
3. PRE-JOB PLANNING – ON-SITE ............................. 39
3.1 Well Planning/Preparation ................................ 39
3.2 CT Management and Safe Operations ............. 42
3.3 Hydraulics ................................................... 45
3.4 Equipment Maintenance ................................... 45
3.5 Contingencies .............................................. 46
3.6 Well Control .............................................. 47
4. OPERATIONS EXECUTION ............................. 48
4.1 Safety .............................................. 48
4.2 Data Acquisition .............................................. 49
4.3 Bottom-Hole Assembly and CT Deployment .... 50
4.3.1 Typical Bottom Hole Assembly ........... 50
4.3.1.1 CT Connector (CTC) ........ 51
4.3.1.2 Dual Check Valves ........... 51
4.3.1.3 Hydraulic Disconnect........ 52
4.3.1.4 Circulation Sub ................. 52
4.3.1.5 Non-Rotating Joint............ 52
4.3.1.6 Orienter and Equalizing Sub52
4.3.1.7 MWD Equipment .............. 53
- iv - Sound CTD Practices

Table of Contents
4.3.1.8 Downhole Mud Motors ..... 54

4.3.1.9 Drilling Bits........................ 55
4.3.2 Tripping and Wiper Trips..................... 58
4.4 Drilling Fluid .............................................. 59
4.5 Window Milling Operations ............................... 61
4.5.1 Cement Whipstock ............................. 61
4.5.2 Mechanical Whipstock ........................ 62
4.6 Production Liner: Running and Cementing...... 64
4.6.1 Liner Running: Blank Liner................. 65
4.6.2 Liner Cementing ............................. 66
4.6.3 Liner Running: Pre-Perforated or ..........
Slotted Liner ............................. 67
4.7 Logging/Perforating........................................... 68
4.8 Operational Problems ....................................... 70
4.8.1 Lost Circulation ............................. 70
4.8.2 Stuck Pipe ............................. 72
4.8.3 Open-Hole Sidetracks ......................... 75
4.8.3.1 Sidetrack from a Cement
Plug . ............................ 75
4.8.3.2 Sidetrack from a Mechanical
Plug . ............................ 77
4.8.3.3 Open Hole ........................ 78
4.9 Well Control .............................................. 80
4.10 Underbalanced Drilling...................................... 83
4.10.1 Underbalanced Drilling
Applications ............................. 84
4.10.2 Deployment Systems .......................... 85
4.10.3 Mechanical Considerations................. 87
4.10.3.1 Hydraulically Operated
BHA Components............. 87
4.10.3.2 Tubing Collapse
Pressure ........................... 87
4.10.3.3 H2S Corrosion/Embrittlement 88
4.10.4 Surface Equipment ............................. 88
4.10.5 Well Control ............................. 88
5. POST-JOB REVIEW ............................. 90
5.1 CTD Planning and Execution Review............... 90
5.2 CTD Operations Review ................................... 91
5.3 Action Plan .............................................. 92
6. CTD REFERENCES ............................. 93
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1: Example CTD Check Lists........... A-1
Attachment 2: Example CTD Sidetrack Well ...........

Summary.................................. A-7
Attachment 3: Example CTD Wellbore Diagram A-9
Attachment 4: Example CTD BOP Design ........ A-11
-v- Sound CTD Practices

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 ORGANIZATION OF THE MANUAL
This Coiled-Tubing Drilling (CTD) Sound Practices

Manual provides tools needed by CTD engineers and
supervisors to plan, design and perform safe, successful
CTD operations. As emphasized throughout, both careful
planning and attention to detail are mandatory for
success. A bibliography of many useful CTD references
is presented in Chapter 6.
This manual is organized according to three processes: 1)

Pre-Job Planning Process, 2) Operations Execution
Process, and 3) Post-Job Review Process. Each is
discussed in a logical and sequential format.
I. PRE-JOB PLANNING (Chapters 2 and 3)
The purpose of the pre-job planning process is to interpret

the proposed wellbore configuration and objectives of the
well. This process involves input from all parties
participating in the project with emphasis on engineering
planning and on-site preparation. Objectives of this
process are:
• Clearly define objectives of the CTD job
• Data acquisition and review as well as

analysis of feasibility
• Develop a detailed project scheduling chart

outlining critical tasks and milestones
• Initial design of the wellbore along with

procedures and approvals
• Estimated cost and equipment procurement
• Safe overall operational plan
II. OPERATIONS EXECUTION (Chapter 4)
Safe and successful completion of wellbore drilling

operations is the primary purpose of the operations
execution process. Effective monitoring, recording and
correct interpretation of the data acquired during
operations are crucial to the success of the project and
future CTD projects. This process provides the following
outcomes:
• Data acquisition and quality assurance of data
• A cost-effective wellbore drilled to meet

objectives as set forth in Pre-Job Planning
Process
• Safe overall operation

III. POST-JOB REVIEW (Chapter 5)
A comprehensive review of the execution, process, data

and results of the CTD Operation is the ultimate purpose
of the post-job review process. This process is designed
to validate the data acquired and transform it into
information that can be used to modify and improve
operations for subsequent CTD jobs. If an operator
undergoes the extra effort required for collecting high-
quality data, then those data should be used to derive all
possible benefits. This information needs to be
distributed to all parties for edification for future CTD
projects. The following outcomes are provided from this
process:
-1- Sound CTD Practices

1. Introduction
Figure 1. CTD Operation
• An assessment of the CTD operations and

modifications to the planning and execution
processes
• A review of the data/information for input into

CTD operations
• A review of the results of the well (i.e., were

the objectives for the well met?)
• More efficient operations on future CTD jobs
• CTD data base for monitoring operational

efficiency and cost reduction
1.2 BASIC PROCEDURE FOR CTD
As a general rule, these steps should be followed to drill a

well using CT:
1. Clearly define the objectives of the well. Why

use CT for this well? Re-entry or new?
Underbalanced, balanced, or over-balanced
fluid? Hole size? Cuttings transport? Liner or
open-hole completion?
2. Review the well history and mechanical

condition of an existing well. If a new well,
review offset well data. Well should be
screened in the three main areas of
mechanical condition, reservoir quality and
issues, and directional considerations for
reaching the target.
3. Perform feasibility study and identify drilling

hazards, risks and controls. Determine what
workover operations are required prior to the
CTD rig coming to location and write
procedures for this work.
4. Design and prepare a preliminary directional

plan.
5. Obtain regulatory approval for pre-rig work

and CTD operation. Perform pre-CTD rig
work.
6. Begin site preparation review with the CT

contractor.
7. Review CT equipment needed for the project

and determine what equipment meets the
requirements of this particular project.
8. Determine auxiliary equipment required and

its position in relation to the CTD rig.
9. Determine required well-control equipment

and determine proper configuration for the
proposed well and anticipated conditions.

1. Introduction
10. Review and finalize the directional plan for

the well. Discuss with the directional driller
and determine the bottom-hole assembly
(BHA) that will be needed to accomplish this
plan.
11. Choose a drilling fluid based on formation

information provided and run wellbore
hydraulics calculations to determine if fluid
and system are appropriate for the well
conditions.
12. Determine type of window-milling operation

required for the well.
13. Decide if any open-hole logging is required

and if the well will be perforated.
14. Evaluate need for a liner in the open hole. If

a liner is needed, choose size and type of liner
to be run and if cementing is required.
15. Write final drilling procedure. Set up and

conduct a pre-spud meeting.
16. Make changes/additions to the procedure.

Write any contingency procedures.
17. Prepare site for the rig and move in rig.
18. Ensure all equipment is inspected and

maintenance records are available.
19. Confirm that all procedures are written and

in place.
20. Call regulatory agency, directional tool

personnel, directional driller and BHA supplier
as well as any specialty tools, liner and liner
equipment.
21. If window was not milled during pre-rig work,

mill window in existing well.
22. Swap out milling fluid for drilling fluid and drill
well according to directional plan.
23. Record and report all required data during

the drilling operation.
24. Run open-hole logs as required.
25. Run liner in open hole, if required. If

cementing is necessary, cement liner
according to procedure.
26. Log and perforate as necessary.
27. Rig down CT unit and move off of well.
28. Accumulate and assimilate all data from the

CTD project.
29. Review with the CTD team the results from

the project. Perform vendor review with each
vendor.
30. Enter all data into the database. Make

changes and document for future wells.

2. PRE-JOB PLANNING – ENGINEERING
Summary
The Pre-Job Planning Process is a primary key to a

successful CTD project and meeting the desired
objectives. There are two essential elements to this
process 1) Preliminary Engineering (see Chapter
2) and 2) On-Site Preparation (see Chapter 3).
Preliminary engineering requires several steps to

ensure the well is ready for CTD operations.
Through thorough research and planning, the well is
screened for suitability as well as feasibility, and all
reasonable alternative remedial operations are
considered. About half of CTD projects are
sidetracks from existing wells and half are new wells.
Sidetracking operations involve understanding the
extent of remaining reserves and the planned
wellbore position in relation to the existing wellbore.
A preliminary directional plan is determined and then
generated. Also, if applicable, CT simulation studies
are performed to determine if the proposed well can
be re-entered and worked over with smaller diameter
CT for later operations. Plans are made for
performing all of the needed preparatory work (i.e.,
P&A existing well, run caliper survey, set whipstock,
etc.) before the CTD unit is set up over the well or
the work is performed due to timing or other issues.
2.1 OVERVIEW OF ENGINEERING

ANALYSIS
Screening of the candidates for CTD is a core priority

for the engineering team. As part of the screening
process, the geologist, reservoir engineer, and CTD
engineer provisionally agree on the target polygon.
For re-entries, the kick-off point is determined by the
CTD engineer and is generally located in the
production casing/liner and below the intermediate
casing shoe. Every attempt should be made to avoid
milling a window in areas of difficult formations,
especially known sloughing shales. Also, if feasible,
the kick-off point should be located deep enough to
allow future CTD sidetracks. The cement bond log, if
available, is reviewed and good cement coverage
behind the casing where the window is to be milled is
recommended. The open-hole caliper, if available,
should be reviewed as well to determine if any
washouts exist in the vicinity of the proposed kick-off
point.
After the kick-off point is determined, the first

directional plan is developed and approved by the
reservoir engineer and the geologist before
proceeding. The condition of the casing/liner and
tubing (if applicable) is determined. A review of well
records is undertaken to check that there are no
unusual restrictions in the wellbore that might inhibit
setting the whipstock or running the CT drilling
assembly. Casing damage or restrictions (such as
scale, cement nodes or fill) will affect the P&A
procedures or the final choice of whipstock setting
depth/cement kick-off plug top. Any required
tubing/casing pressure tests, caliper surveys and drift
runs should be requested at this time.
The CTD engineer should review the equipment to

be used on the project to ensure that it meets the
requirements of the job. Fluids to be used for the
operation are determined and hydraulics checked to
ensure the system will handle the required rates and
pressures. Well-control equipment is inspected,
checked, and tested to ensure that all regulatory as

2. Pre-Job Planning – Engineering
well as additional job requirements are met. Final

preparation of the procedure is completed and
approved prior to informing on-site personnel about
the job. The pre-spud meeting is scheduled, during
which the job is fully reviewed, as well as
ascertaining that all personnel involved understand
the objectives of the well.
2.2 INTRODUCTION TO CTD
Coiled Tubing Drilling (CTD) as performed today is

generally considered to have begun in 1991 with a
horizontal sidetrack re-entry drilled by Oryx Energy in
the Austin Chalk of Texas. From that time to the
present, the technology advanced rapidly, with on the
order of 4000 CTD operations completed (Figure 2).
Currently, about 900-1000 CTD wells are completed
a year, including about 120 directional re-entries and
800 new shallow vertical wells (many of these
vertical wells are in Canada). Several key factors
have contributed to the rapid rise in activity:
Figure 2. Early Growth of CTD

• The CT service industry has achieved a
level of maturity capable of providing
necessary equipment and basic
techniques with the required degree of
reliability.
• Technical advantages exist for CTD that

enable it to compete in and sometimes
dominate certain “niche” markets.
• Technical advances have occurred in

directional-drilling technology and under-
balanced drilling techniques.
• The industry has gained greater

understanding of the capabilities and
limitations of CTD, enabling better
candidate selection and ultimately a
higher success rate.
Understanding the criteria for selection of appropriate

CTD candidates is possibly the most influential factor
for ensuring the success of any CTD project. This
requires a thorough knowledge and understanding of
the capabilities and limitations of the equipment and
techniques in use. Preparation for a CTD project
typically involves a considerable amount of pre-
planning and research, as well as coordinating the
input of several specialist disciplines. These
disciplines and their responsibilities are as follows
(note: not all disciplines will be required for every
CTD project):
1. CTD Project Manager – in charge of

overall management of the CTD project.
In most cases, this will be an employee
from the operator (if desired).
2. CTD Engineer – responsible for the

technical aspects of the CTD project.
Prepares all procedures and obtains
regulatory approvals.
3. CTD Supervisor – responsible for

coordination and implementation of all
well-site activities.

4. CT Tool Pusher – responsible for

operations and personnel in the
execution of the drilling program.
5. CT Driller – responsible for operation of

the CT equipment for safe and efficient
drilling of the well.
6. Reservoir Engineer – responsible for

determining well placement and reserves.
7. Geologist – responsible for well

placement in targeted sand and for
determining any formation problems that
may be encountered (i.e. faults, high-
permeability streaks, changes in rock
properties, etc.).
8. Directional Driller – responsible for on-

site execution of well placement.
Ensures all directional equipment is
functioning and properly assembled.
2.3 INITIAL WELL RESEARCH AND

PLANNING
Sound CTD operations require careful and complete

pre-planning and exhaustive research. The first task
for the CTD project manager is to interpret the well
proposal and objectives using the following criteria:
Define ultimate objectives. The project

objectives must be clearly defined and
benchmarks established for measuring
achievements. Is the objective to expand
CTD research, or to provide a
commercially viable product, or to drill for
appraisal, production, delineation or
exploration purposes? Will this wellbore
be utilized again for another sidetrack? If
so, how should the completion be set up
to accommodate future sidetracks?
Acquire accurate data. The complete

well history including a mechanical
history and reservoir considerations is
generated. An annotated production plot
of the well highlighting fluctuations in
production is needed. An updated
wellbore sketch with all tubular
dimensions noted as well as any
problems such as tight spots, holes in
tubing/casing, plugs, fill and fish left in
hole should be validated by the
mechanical history. Formation
description of each horizon to be
encountered including but not limited to
bottom-hole temperature and pressure,
rock properties, formation dip angle, lost-
circulation zones, faults and/or high
permeability streaks, and any offset well
data available are supplied by the
Reservoir Engineer and/or Geologist.
What is the primary reason for using

CTD? Does the condition of the well and
the equipment to be used indicate a
reasonable chance of success? The
fewer variables introduced to the project,
the greater the chance for success.
Give careful attention to details

concerning equipment procurement,
personnel assignment, and timing of
start up. A detailed project scheduling
chart to reflect critical tasks is needed. Is

the time frame acceptable for obtaining

personnel and equipment, and
conducting any pre-testing or trial?
Pre-test whenever uncertain and

wherever possible. It is advisable to
conduct tests/trials on operations that are
technically complex, or which utilize new
concepts.
2.3.1 Well Research
It is essential that all information concerning the well

be freely communicated to the parties involved. The
Reservoir Engineer (RE) should confer with the
Geologists and ensure that the placement of the well
will be optimal as well as feasible. It is imperative
that the field map, reservoir isopach, and formation
cross-section be reviewed in detail prior to proposing
the well to the CTD Engineer. Research and
discussion of the type of well needed to accomplish
the objective should be fully resolved (e.g., will this
be a deepening of the well, a sidetrack or a well
drilled from the surface?). There are three major
areas of criteria that must be considered for
candidate selection:
1. Mechanical
• minimum restrictions
• competent tubing, caliper history
• true vertical depth (TVD) distance

from packer to target zone to
incorporate the kick-off point and
landing horizontal
• well inclination: vertical, high angle

(inclination 50-90°) or horizontal
• two-string kick out due to low packer

or damaged straddle completion
• amount and/or cost of preparatory

work for CT rig
• what is the future utilization for this

wellbore? (set up completion to
allow for future through tubing work)
• indications of potential lost circulation

in target sands: injection well,
fraced, or losses noted in drilling
original hole
2. Reservoir
• Will proposed target cross faults or

sands with differential pressures too
high to handle (i.e., will high
pressures cause excessive losses to
lower pressure zone)?
• Existing reserves value of current

completion – too high to risk?
• Existing production rates and sand

quality in target zone – too poor for
even horizontal to provide sufficient
rate?
• Net pay with knowledge of water/oil

contact and gas/oil contact
• Object of sidetrack?
Horizontal for productivity

Extend or convert to horizontal
to reach infill target

Replace damaged production

liner with new twin well
• Do sand quality/formation damage

issues dictate running a slotted liner
versus a cemented/perforated liner?
• Reservoir description: rock type,

faulting, geological changes in zone,
formation dip
3. Directional
• KOP in optimal direction and

preferably not in shale zone. Is there
good cement behind casing at this
point?
• Horizontal length needed – can CT

reach target with acceptable WOB?
• Azimuth changes – will coil lose too

much weight transfer while steering
toward target?
4. Other
• Can the formations to be

encountered be drilled with CT? If
rock types dictate the use of roller-
cone bits, is sufficient bit weight
available?
2.3.2 Well Planning
An information package including the research and

discussion of location and target for the well should
be sent to the CTD Engineer for review and
preliminary study. The CTD engineer should review
in extensive detail the information package, well
history and wellbore sketch for any possible
problems that might change the risk of the well.
Once it is determined that the well is a viable
candidate for CTD, a preliminary directional plan
should be developed by the CTD engineer and the
Directional Planner. A step-by-step procedure
should be followed to determine the feasibility of the
well and to identify the drilling hazards, risks and
controls. Figure 3 illustrates the type of logical
procedure that should be used in this initial analysis
stage. (This is provided as an example only.)
After feasibility has been determined and drilling risks

and hazards assessed, personnel and equipment
requirements are established by the CTD engineer.
Due to the complexity of these projects, use of a
suitable project planning program is highly
recommended. A contract for the project operations
is set up with the CTD contractor and the planned
objectives presented, as well as personnel and
equipment requirements. The CTD contractor should
be provided with as much information as possible
that allows for planning personnel and equipment
usage and also any input the contractor may have on
the project. Cost of the project can now be
generated with all aspects of the operation in mind,
and the necessary permits and approvals applied for
from governing agencies. As discussed in the
following sections, drilling and contingency
procedures are written with each section tied into the
objectives of the well.

Figure 3: Example Procedure for

Determining Feasibility of CTD
2.4 WELL AND SITE PREPARATION
Well data gathered earlier should be reviewed again

to determine the status of the existing well. No CTD
work should begin until the wellbore condition is fully
understood. Any recent well work performed should
be documented and all files updated. The CTD
engineer will then plan the workover operations
required prior to the CTD rig coming to location.
Some of the operations that may be required are (but
are not limited to) well kill, removal of any restrictions
in the wellbore (i.e., mill nipple, clean out fill), drift
tubing and tag TD, change out live gas-lift valves to
dummies, pull or lock open the subsurface safety
valve, run a thru-tubing whipstock, and P&A existing
perforations.
Site preparation for the project is an important initial

consideration whether the well is onshore or
offshore. The engineer plans for transportation to the
site, as well as plans rig position on the well-site pad
or platform. Consideration should be made for heavy
equipment use for leveling the pad onshore or the
possible need for an additional crane and skid beams
for offshore. The equipment layout is vital to a
successful operation and a detailed drawing should
be provided as part of the procedure for moving and
rigging up the CTD unit and equipment. To make
this effective, the CTD contractor needs to be highly
involved in this portion of the preparation. For
offshore operations, a seabed survey should be
reviewed and supplied to the contractor.
2.5 CTD SURFACE EQUIPMENT
Overview of Surface Equipment
Many CTD applications can be undertaken using the

same CT equipment as used for conventional CT
well-intervention work. However, as CTD experience
has been gained and the complexity of CTD
operations increases, there is an increasing trend
toward the manufacture of CT equipment specifically
for CTD operations.
The type of application, location and complexity of

the operation will determine which items of surface
equipment are required. Principal components
required to complete most CTD projects are
reviewed below:

• Basic CT equipment
• CTD substructure or rig
• Drilling fluid mixing, storage and treatment
• Drilling fluid pumping equipment
• Monitoring and recording equipment
• Pressure control equipment
• Ancillary surface equipment
• Pipe handling equipment
• Safety and emergency equipment
• Rig camp and well-site facilities
Figure 4 Basic CT Equipment
2.5.1 Coiled-Tubing Equipment
Basic CT equipment used for the majority of CTD

operations is very similar to that used for CT well
intervention services (Figure 4). In some cases,
individual items may be modified or altered to suit a
specific application, but generally the equipment is
interchangeable between applications. The trend
toward larger CT sizes in CTD often results in
equipment of a size that is not easily compatible with
well-intervention operations. For example, 2-in. or
2⅜-in. CT strings are not commonly used for well-
intervention operations. A brief overview of key
components (CT string, injector, reel, power pack,
crane, and substructure) is provided below.
2.5.1.1 CT String
Even "basic" CTD operations can require high

performance from the CT string. For example, if
drilling operations require multiple passes over the
same hole section (wiper trips), string fatigue can
quickly accumulate. In addition, the likelihood of
stuck pipe is greater during CTD than in most
conventional well-intervention applications. This not
only means that the performance characteristics of
the CT string must be optimum, but that operating
limits of CT strings for CTD must be known at all
times.
For new and directional wells, CT sizes of 2⅜ or 2⅞

in. are typically required. However, for some simple
well deepenings using a BHA with limited hydraulic
requirements, a 2-in. CT string may be sufficient.
Currently, most vertical deepenings are done with 2-
in. CT and most vertical new wells are done with 2⅞-
in CT. In almost all applications, CT strings with wall
thickness of at least 0.156-in. manufactured from
70,000- or 80,000-psi yield strength material are
recommended. However, for deeper vertical wells or
longer step-out horizontal wells, a 100,000- or
110,000-psi yield strength material may be required.
- 10 - Sound CTD Practices

The well configuration might require the use of a

tapered string with wall thickness varying from 0.190-
to 0.125-in. to reach the required objective.
During the design phase of most applications, the

optimum size, wall thickness and yield strength are
determined using CT modeling software (Figures 5
and 6) and design data from the intended
application. The CTD Engineer must determine the
parameters of the project and provide the CTD
contractor with the design data for modeling runs.
Some of the design data required are, but not limited
to:
Figure 5. Modeling CT Stresses for

Planned Field Operations (from MTI’s
• the well path
• open-hole diameter
• drilling fluid weight and viscosity
• length and diameter of existing tubulars if

drilled through tubing
• length and diameter of the BHA
• maximum overpull allowed
• required weight on bit (WOB) at total

depth (TD)
In general, the size of CT selected for a given drilling

job will be a compromise based on tubing life
(smaller sizes have a longer cycle-life, but lower
strength and limited flow rates) and flow area (larger
sizes have greater strength and flow area, but
shorter cycle life). Consequently, CTD is usually
done with 2⅜- or 2⅞-in. CT. However, recent
developmental work has been performed using "odd"
sizes of CT to optimize performance. For example,
2⅝-in. CT has been used to drill 3¾- to 4⅛-in. hole
size because it exhibited the optimal combination of
cycle-life (due to lower surface pressures), annular
area and flow rates for increased annular velocities
and additional WOB. Another consideration is the
amount of CT that can be reeled onto a given spool
to achieve the desired depth or the maximum weight
the crane can support.
After modeling runs are completed, a thorough

review and comparison of the runs is made to
determine the best case for the project. Friction
factors used especially in a deviated and/or
horizontal hole are checked to ensure validity of the
data. Availability and delivery of the CT string must
be verified with the CT manufacturer.

Figure 6. Modeling CT Buckling for

Planned Wellpath (from MTI’s CTDRAG
In the event that a computer model is not available,

the following long-standing recommendations may be
considered:
• Internal pressure limits:
Maximum pump pressure while

running tubing – 4000 psi
Maximum pump pressure while tubing

stationary – 5000 psi
• Maximum collapse differential: 1500 psi
• Maximum recommended wellhead

pressure: 3500 psi
• Maximum CT tension limit: 80% of

manufacturer’s published yield strength
• Maximum CT diameter and ovality:
Maximum OD – 106% of nominal CT

diameter
Figure 7. Typical CT Injector

Minimum OD – 96% of nominal CT
diameter
2.5.1.2 CT Injector Head
The CT injector head (Figure 7) provides the power

and traction necessary to run and retrieve the CT
string into and out of the wellbore. Several hydraulic
systems are used to enable the CT unit (CTU)
operator to exercise a high degree of control over
any CT string movement – an important feature in
delicate CTD operations where WOB must be
carefully controlled. A thorough understanding of the
injector control and monitoring systems is essential
to ensure the equipment is operated efficiently, safely
and without risk of damage to the well equipment,
pressure control equipment, CT string or CTU.

For new and directional wells, an injector head with

at least a 60,000-lbf pull capacity is recommended.
For well deepening, a 40,000-lbf capacity injector
head may be adequate if conditions allow. A
minimum gooseneck radius of 72 in. is required for
1¾-in. and larger CT strings. While the majority of
drilling is done with standard CT injector heads,
special hybrid units have been developed which
allow running both continuous CT and jointed pipe.
These units allow the CTU to do more of the tasks
associated with drilling, such as running and pulling
completion tubing. Key performance data and
specifications of common injector head models are
listed in Table 1; recommended guide arch radii are
shown in Table 2.
Table 1. Injector Head Specifications
Injector Height Width Depth Weight Snub Pull CT Sizes

Model (in.) (in.) (in.) (lb) (x1000 lb) (in.)
HR440 80 52 55 6750 20 60 1 to 2⅜
HR480 109 60 60 11200 40 100 1¼ to 3½
SS 400 82 42 58 5700 20 40 ¾ to 2⅜
SS 800 82 42 58 6125 20 80 ¾ to 2⅜
Table 2. Typical Guide Arch Radii
CT OD Reel Core Tubing Guide
(in) Radii (in.) Arch Radii (in.)
¾ 24 48
1 20-30 48-54
1¼ 25-36 48-72
1½ 30-40 48-72
1¾ 35-48 72-96
2 40-48 72-96
2⅜ 48-54 90-120
2⅞ 54-58 90-120
3½ 65-70 90-120
Figure 8. CT Guide Arches
2.5.1.3 CT Reel
The primary function of a CT reel (Figure 9) is to

safely store and protect the CT string. This should
be achieved while avoiding excessive damage to the
string through fatigue (bending) or mechanical
damage from spooling. The reel typically
incorporates a swivel assembly which enables fluids

to be pumped through the tubing string while the reel

drum rotates. For CTD applications incorporating a
CT string with wireline installed, a bulkhead and
collector assembly is required to enable the electrical
conductors to pass from within the CT string
(pressure seal) and out of the rotating reel drum
(electrical swivel/collector). In addition to the
hydraulic connections required to operate the drive,
braking and spooling guide (level-wind) systems,
reels used in CTD operations are typically fitted with
additional monitoring equipment and connections (for
example, pressure monitoring sensors used with
MWD mud-pulse technology, or CT string monitoring
equipment such as a diameter and ovality monitoring
device).
Figure 9. CT Reel
The theoretical tubing capacity of a reel (Figure 10)

can be calculated using the formula below. This
assumes perfect spooling across the width of the
reel. Because this condition is difficult to achieve in
practice, an allowance must be made to maintain reel
capacity within its practical limitations.
L = (A+C) A B K
where:
L = tubing capacity (ft)
A = tubing stack height (in.)
B = width between flanges (in.)
C = reel drum core diameter (in.)
K = K value for different tubing

sizes (ft/in3) (see below)
Figure 10. CT Reel Capacity

K values for different tubing sizes are:
3
Tubing OD (in.) K value (ft/in )
1 0.262
1¼ 0.168
1½ 0.116
1¾ 0.086
2 0.066
2⅜ 0.046
2⅞ 0.032
3½ 0.021
2.5.1.4 CT Power Pack
The function of the power pack is to provide the

hydraulic power to operate the CTU and
primary/secondary pressure-control systems (e.g.,
stripper and BOP systems). In addition to the
hydraulic power supplied when running, the power
pack incorporates an accumulator facility to allow
limited operation of pressure-control equipment
following engine shut-down. The CTD engineer
should verify certification of this equipment and the
maintenance schedule with the contractor. If
nonstandard equipment or auxiliary equipment is to
be powered by the CTU power pack during drilling
operations, it should be confirmed that the output of
the power pack is adequate and that the pressures
and flow rates are compatible. The extended
duration of most CTD operations requires that
provision be made for adequate inspection and
maintenance during the operation, e.g., refueling and
lubrication checks.
2.5.1.5 Crane and Substructure
All CTD operations will require some lifting, moving

and placing of equipment of tools (BHA). These
requirements must be determined during this
planning stage. Local conditions and configuration of
the equipment will determine the size (height) and
capacity of the crane. The crane is often used to
place the injector on top of the BOP and then to hold
the injector in place. This effectively ties up and
limits the crane. Typically, the crane's boom length
should be sufficient to handle a 40-ft BHA (straight
drilling/milling) or a 65-ft BHA (directional drilling)
over the substructure. The CTD engineer must
determine if a substructure is needed and then the
size and type required for the given project
parameters.
The substructure (Figure 11) provides stability to the

wellhead equipment and can include additional
features ranging from a simple platform to a complex
jacking frame capable of running and pulling wellbore
tubulars. The key features of a drilling substructure
are:

Figure 11. Multipurpose CT Support
• Elevates the working area above the

wellhead for easier access to the
wellbore
• Allows supporting the injector head

without the crane and provides a means
for raising/lowering the injector for make-
up. Also, allows skidding the injector
on/off the wellhead when rigging BHAs.
• Provides a safe working platform for

personnel while handling the BHA and
injector hook-up
• Provides a means for supporting the

BHA/tubulars during make-up using a
“false rotary” opening and use of spider
and slips
Substructures are designed for use within a limited

range of vertical adjustment, enabling the
substructure to be adjusted to suit the specific
wellhead and surrounding conditions. Typically, sub-
structure legs are adjusted to an appropriate height
and fixed (pinned) in place.
A more complex version of the CTD drilling

substructure is the hybrid unit, or jacking frame. This
structure is equipped with an upper platform mounted
on hydraulic rams that can be raised and lowered
from the lower substructure base. By using power
slips on the upper and lower platform openings,
tubulars can be run or pulled from the well by
raising/lowering the upper platform. Advantages of
this type of substructure are flexibility in position
adjustment, and a reduced dependence on high-
capacity cranes or derricks for running or pulling well
tubulars.
2.5.1.6 Pipe-Handling Equipment
Pipe-handling equipment is used to help ensure safe

and correct handling and make-up/break-out of
jointed tubulars and tools, e.g., drill collars, tubing
joints, casing joints, etc. Although several pipe-
handling components are considered standard items
commonly used on conventional drilling rigs, their
use on CTD operations may require minor
modifications or a reduction in size to operate
efficiently.
The requirement for pipe-handling equipment is

dependent on the size and nature of the equipment
to be made-up/broken-out, and the configuration of
CT and pressure-control equipment. The following
items of equipment are commonly used to increase
the safety and efficiency of CTD operations.

1. C plate – Slotted plate that allows

passage of tubulars into the wellbore and
can be removed/installed with tubulars in
place. This plate supports the slip bowls.
2. Tubing spider slips – used to hold the

BHA or jointed tubing when making up or
breaking two joints.
3. Elevators – used to handle single joints of

drill collars, tubing, casing.
4. Safety clamps – used as a safety device

to prevent the string from falling into the
hole (if the slips do not hold and the string
slides).
5. Power tong – used to make up or break

the BHA, casing or tubing connections
under controlled torque conditions.
6. Crane – used to handle single joints of

BHA, casing or tubing. If necessary, it
may be used to handle/run the whole
BHA or casing string if within the crane
capacity. Boom length must be sufficient
to handle a 40-ft pipe/BHA over the
substructure.
2.5.2 Well-Control Equipment
The configuration of BOP equipment required for any

CTD operation largely depends on the type of
application and the anticipated "worst case"
conditions that may be encountered. Depending on
the application, the configuration may change as
work progresses; i.e., as the likelihood of higher
pressures increases, so must the operating capacity
of equipment increase. There are several categories
of "BOP systems" which require significantly different
approaches to equipment configuration. One or
more of the following scenarios will apply to the
majority of CTD operations:
1. Low-pressure diverter system – Used for

drilling surface hole on new wells where
shallow gas is a potential hazard
2. Bit size less than quad CT BOP ID – Bit

sizes less than 4 in. can pass through the
quad BOP (Figure 12). If the well is
deviated, the bend in the motor housing
will further limit bit OD. In general,
maximum bit OD is 3⅞ in. for directional
wells.
3. Bit size greater than quad CT BOP ID –

Bit sizes greater than 4 in. cannot pass
through the quad BOP
4. Hybrid pulling/running operations –

Requires BOPs to suit the size of tubing/
casing handled
5. Underbalanced BHA deployment –

Requires special BOP configuration to
accommodate live well conditions and
allow pressure deployment.
Basic well-control equipment requirements can be

summarized as shown below. Priority or importance
assigned to each factor may vary with application
and specific conditions. However, each will have
some bearing on the configuration and operation of
the necessary pressure-control equipment:
• Contain wellbore pressure and fluids,

e.g., provide a primary barrier (stripper)
• Enable controlled circulation, e.g.,

through the drilling or choke manifold

• Divert or route wellbore returns or

separated products to safe area for
storage or disposal
• Continually monitor drilling fluid levels,

flow rates and pressures
For most CTD applications, a 5000-psi pressure

rating is adequate. However, the operating pressure
rating must exceed the expected bottom-hole
pressure. BOP size (or bore) depends on the hole or
planned completion size. CT BOP systems are
commonly available in 4-in. (ID) quad configurations.
1
Larger BOP sizes (e.g., 5⅛-in. up to 7 /16-in.) are less
common but generally available in single or dual-ram
configurations. If bit/hole sizes greater than 71/16-in.
are desired, then conventional drilling BOPs may be
required (e.g., 11 in.). In most cases, a pipe ram
shear/blind ram configuration is required as a
minimum. In such cases an annular BOP is
frequently included to provide flexibility and
contingency in operation. In ram-type BOPs, the tool
or CT-string diameter that can be closed on is
determined by the fixed size of the rams (although
variable-bore rams are available that allow closing on
a limited range of diameters). The annular-type BOP
can be closed on any diameter, ranging from full
open to full closed.
CT well-control equipment used for the majority of

CTD operations is very similar to that used for CT
well-intervention services. In some cases the
individual items may be modified or altered to suit a
specific application, but generally the equipment is
interchangeable between applications. A brief
overview of key components is provided below.
Stripper
Side-door strippers are the most common

configuration used on CTD operations. General
availability combined with easy serviceability while in
operation (with the necessary precautions
implemented) make this a popular choice.
Quad BOP
If the size (ID) allows, a standard 4-in. quad BOP

(Figure 12) provides adequate functionality with
convenient rig-up and operation. Larger hole sizes
1
typically require use of 7 /16-in. BOPs.
Figure 12. Quad BOP
Single/Dual BOP
For applications requiring through-bore access

greater than 5⅛ in., the BOP stack, or part thereof,
may be assembled for single or dual-ram BOPs in
1
6⅛- or 7 /16-in. sizes.
Annular BOP
The annular BOP is an extremely flexible component

enabling a wide variety of contingency options over a
range of tool/BHA sizes.

Additional BOP Equipment
Additional equipment typically required to connect,

monitor or operate the pressure-control equipment
package includes the following:
• Kill line – runs between the well-control

stack and the high-pressure pump
manifold and can be used as a
contingency facility to kill the well by
pumping down the annulus
• Choke line – runs from the well-control

stack to the choke manifold providing a
high-pressure conduit necessary when
operating the choke manifold
• Choke manifold – the choke manifold

must be configured for drilling
applications with two manual chokes and
one pressure gauge (some applications
may require a remotely operated choke).
The choke manifold is an important item
of pressure control equipment since it is
used to control wellbore pressures during
critical phases of a drilling operation, e.g.,
as contingency well control or maintaining
well control during underbalanced drilling.
• Mud return line – A remotely operated

valve may be installed on the outlet of the
mud return line, but typically a manual
valve is used as this is simply to shut off
the mud flow. If desired, this mud return
outlet can be configured as a high-
pressure line to enable the use of the CT
stripper as a functional well-control
device. This requires that the spool, riser
and outlet be rated to full pressure and
the line from the spool be fitted with
remote valves as required by regulations
or prudent practices to permit total
isolation for use of the stripper under full
pressure conditions.
• BOP controls and instruments – all BOP

equipment should be controlled from the
CTU operator’s console (Figure 13) or
control cabin area. In some cases, it may
also be desirable or necessary to include
a repeat/remote control located in a safe
area for emergency operation, e.g.,
remote operation of shear/seal tertiary
pressure control equipment.
• Mud spool/riser – Typically, the injector is

connected to the actual wellhead BOPs
by way of a spool and/or riser. This
represents what is termed the "bell-
nipple" on a conventional drilling rig. The
function of this piece of equipment is to
provide an outlet for the mud return to the
pits, and to provide a means of
connecting the CT injector physically to
the riser. This physical connection is
often termed the quick disconnect or
quick connect.
Figure 13. CTU Operator’s

1
For 7 /16-in. BOPs and remotely operated valves on
the mud return or choke lines, the control position is
located on the accumulator or Koomey unit that must
be positioned next to the CTU cabin. Remote
controls between the Koomey unit and the CTU BOP
command panel can be adapted if necessary.
2.5.2.1 Well-Control Equipment Testing
Testing of the well-control equipment is required for

CTD operation. In this initial planning stage, a full-
body test or stump test of the well-control equipment
should be performed to the required working
pressure of the equipment using an incompressible
fluid prior to bringing the equipment to location,
except that an annular type preventer need not be
tested to more than 50% of its rated working
pressure. The CTD Supervisor should witness this
testing and the results recorded as part of the daily
well log record.
2.5.2.2 Well-Control Procedures and

Responsibilities
The preparation phase of every CTD operation

should include procedures that are developed to suit
specific conditions and requirements of each well.
The following well control issues relating to job
responsibilities and procedures are provided as a
guide in preparation for specific CTD operations.
• It is the CTD operator's responsibility to

close in the well if a kick is indicated or
suspected. It is better to shut in the well
as a precautionary measure than to
hesitate when conditions may require
closure of the BOP equipment.
• The hole must be kept full of fluid at all

times. (This is core to the philosophy of
overbalanced drilling, but may not be
such a requirement in some
underbalanced operations.)
• Flow checks should be performed

coinciding with all drilling breaks.
• When tripping pipe, a trip sheet should be

completed and a flow check performed:
at the lowest casing shoe

prior to pulling BHA through the BOP
• Slow circulation rate check should be
taken:
at the beginning of every tour/prior to

every RIH
any time the drilling fluid density is

changed
• When lost circulation occurs and cannot

be regained by circulation through the CT
string, the annulus should be filled with
the lightest fluid available (typically water)
and volumes recorded. CT has no
tolerance for differential sticking. If
circulation is lost, then you are probably
stuck!
• Tripping out of the hole without full

returns is potentially dangerous and
should only be permitted under known
conditions with permission of the CTD
superintendent.
• Drillers should be provided with

procedures detailing the actions to be

taken if a well kicks while drilling surface

hole.
• Unless the following materials are

available for use at the rig site, drilling
operations should be reviewed and, if
necessary, suspended:
1. enough salt (KCl or NaCl) to raise the

fluid weight in the active mud system
3
at least 120 kg/m or 1 ppg
2. enough cement to place at least a

120-m or 400-ft plug in open hole
• Kick drills should be held on a weekly

basis or more often if the rig
superintendent considers it necessary.
Details and results of any drills should be
logged in the drilling report.
• BOP and related equipment should be

pressure and function tested at least
every 14 days.
• Check valves should be run while drilling

and opening hole.
• An appropriate safety valve (TIW) to fit

the top of any BHA left hanging in the
slips should be kept on the rig floor.
• Casing/liner strings will be completely

filled from the top at least every five
joints, irrespective of the type of float
equipment in use.
• Wells should be shut in following the

procedures designated by the operating
company. The relevant step-by-step
procedures for shutting the well in should
be posted near the driller’s panel.
• The driller should check and confirm all

choke manifold, kill and choke lines for
correct positioning at the beginning of
each tour.
• The driller should know true vertical depth

(TVD) measurements at all times.
• Prior to spudding, it is the responsibility of

the CTD Supervisor to review the well
plan and ensure that all primary well-
control/pressure-control issues have
been addressed.
• If the well cannot be closed in with the

BOP, the well should be properly secured
and tested by setting a plug.
• A well-control report should be completed

by the CT driller and CT Supervisor after
all well-control operations.
2.5.3 Ancillary Surface Equipment
Ancillary surface equipment required for any CTD

operation will depend on many factors, such as: 1)
location, 2) expected duration and 3) availability of
well-site utilities/facilities. The following items are
commonly required in support of CTD operations and
are not generally considered as "CT equipment."
1. Generator – provides electricity to the

portacabins/offices, floodlights,
centrifuge, monitoring equipment,
Koomey unit, mud pits (agitators,
shakers, circulating pumps), etc.
2. Electrical distribution panel – provides

electrical connection between the
generator and various electrical devices,
with all necessary breakers and safety
features

3. Flood lights – provide light for safe and

efficient operations at night
4. Air compressor – provides air to start the

CTU engine, or provide compressed air
as required for air winches and power
tools. Air is also required (approximately
100 to 115 psi) to run the air-powered
pumps on the Koomey unit.
5. Miscellaneous items – tools and

equipment necessary to maintain the
CTU and supporting equipment (almost
certainly including a cutting torch and
welding machine)
2.5.4 Monitoring and Recording Equipment
Monitoring and recording key parameters of a drilling

operation is generally required, regardless of the
technique involved, i.e., conventional rotary or CTD.
Well established reporting formats are used to
enable key information and statistics to be retrieved
for the well report or for use in selection of equipment
and techniques for offset wells. Although many of
the systems in use will be integrated to some degree,
there are several distinct areas to be considered.
1. CTU based systems, e.g., CT string

monitoring
2. Drilling fluid parameters
3. Wellbore steering and navigation
4. Formation evaluation
2.5.4.1 CTU Monitoring Equipment
The majority of CTUs engaged in CTD operations will

be equipped with recording and monitoring systems
designed to provide a high degree of reliability to the
CTU and associated equipment. Typical monitoring
and recording parameters include the following:
• CT depth and movement – required for

CT string cycle fatigue monitoring and
ROP assessment
• CT string circulation pressure and flow

rate – required for CT string cycle fatigue
monitoring and well-control purposes
• Wellhead pressure – required for well

control
• CT string weight – monitors CT string and

BHA forces, e.g., WOB
• Tubing monitor – required to confirm CT

string integrity and geometry
2.5.4.2 Drilling Fluid Monitoring Equipment
Key drilling fluid parameters (e.g., pressure rate and

density) are typically displayed and recorded in real
time in the CTU control cabin. Additional parameters
may be monitored and processed continually, with
alarms providing notice of unusual conditions (e.g.,
flow in/out comparison alarm if losses/gains are
detected). Typical monitoring and recording
parameters include the following:
1. Pump pressure and wellhead pressure
2. Pump rate
3. Flow in/out of well – comparison for kick

detection
4. Drilling fluid density
5. Circulating tank volumes – detection of

gain/loss for kick detection

2.5.4.3 Wellbore Steering and Navigation
Monitoring and recording equipment typically used in

CTD directional measurement are directly adapted
conventional directional drilling or wellbore survey
technology. Directional data on the following
parameters are typically monitored and recorded:
1. Wellbore inclination
2. Tool face angle
3. Azimuth
2.5.4.4 Formation Evaluation
1. Gamma ray
2. Resistivity
3. Annular pressure
2.5.5 Safety and Emergency Equipment
Several items of safety and emergency equipment

are generally required in support of CTD operations.
For many of these items, the place of storage and
"readiness for action" are key issues. For example, it
is not sufficient to simply provide/supply H2S
protective equipment; such equipment must be in
operating condition and placed at key locations
around the well site.
Safety and emergency equipment inspections should

be conducted regularly during any drilling operation
and a note of status made on relevant daily reports
(or similar). Typical items of safety and emergency
equipment used in support of CTD operations include
the following:
1. Emergency engine kill systems – often

required on CTU engine and pump
engines located within the designated
hazardous zone surrounding the
wellhead
2. Fire-fighting equipment – general

guidelines, as a minimum, should provide
for CO2 fire extinguishers on the CTU
power pack, pumping unit power pack,
near any port-a-cabins or office
accommodations and in the vicinity of the
fuel tank
3. H2S protective equipment and gas

detection equipment – type, quantity and
placement of H2S protective equipment
may be subject to legislation or corporate
policy
4. Eye wash station – typically located

adjacent to the drilling fluid mixing facility
5. Personal protective equipment – often

required for safe preparation of drilling
fluids, e.g., apron, goggles and long-
sleeved gloves for chemical handling. A
chemical shower may also be required if
corrosive chemicals are to be prepared.
2.6 DIRECTIONAL PLANNING
The amount of directional planning required for a

CTD project will vary depending on the target to be
reached and the wellbore configuration. Directional
drilling companies have a wide range of directional
programs and tools for planning the proposed
wellbore. Hole size to be drilled as well as the
location of the well will help in determining which
directional company to use. The CTD Engineer
should work closely with the directional planner (DP)

and the Reservoir Engineer to ensure any changes

from the preliminary plan are instituted in this final
plan. If the well is a sidetrack, the position and depth
of the window will play an important role in the
smoothness of the build section and any turn
required. This will also be a factor in the ability to
drill with WOB at TD. Careful attention to the
changes in inclination and azimuth in this design will
save drilling time and cost.
The DP needs information such as the planned kick-

off point (depth and direction); if a sidetrack, the
original wellbore survey, surface coordinates,
planned well inclination, target location (coordinates
and approximate depth), target zone height in TVD ft,
planned landing point for horizontal well (TVD ft), and
any zonal boundaries (faults, dip angle, bottom and
top of zone). These data are provided by the CTD
and confirmed with the Reservoir Engineer for the
project. Planning of this wellbore is to optimize the
placement of the well for production/injection. Any
questions about the planned wellbore should be
addressed here and re-iterated in the pre-spud
meeting prior to drilling the well. Once the directional
plan is completed, the CTD Engineer, the Reservoir
Engineer and the Geologist should review it and
ensure that all landing and target points are correct
and the well design meets the planned objectives.
BHA Design and Selection
For any drilling BHA, the downhole tools and

equipment required largely depend on the type and
complexity of the drilling operation and the conditions
under which it is to be conducted. The preferred
BHA will typically be selected considering technical
requirements, local availability and (perhaps most
importantly) the experience of personnel, history and
reputation of the various tool components.
The drilling BHA comprises several components

fulfilling many functions in a relatively aggressive
environment. The operation, limits and reliability of
each component or tool affects the overall
performance of the drilling BHA. As with many other
BHA selection processes, there is frequently a
compromise between sophistication (flexibility) and
simplicity (reliability). Typically, BHAs are configured
according to the type of drilling being done.
Currently, for new vertical wells, BHA sizes are
generally 3 to 4¾ in. OD, depending on the size of
the downhole motor. Concurrently, for directional
drilling, 2¾ to 3 in. seem to be the standard sizes for
directional tools and assemblies. (Note: the actual
dimension may vary from 2⅞ to 3⅛ in. with the motor
being 3⅜ in., but these are considered as 3 in.
nominal size. In slim-hole BHAs, actual dimensions
may vary from 2¼ to 3 in. with a 2⅜ in. motor.) For
underbalanced drilling of directional and vertical
wells, a 3¾-in. motor is most often used. Plans are
still moving forward for future drilling of hole sizes
ranging from 6 to 6¾ in. Several projects have been
performed at shallow depths with these larger hole
sizes. However, more testing and CT development
is required before deeper wells can be drilled in this
range.

Basic CTD applications commonly performed are:
• Vertical applications
New wells
Well deepenings
• Directional applications
high angle wells

horizontal wells
Each application varies in the requirements of, or
functions included in, the drilling BHA. Therefore, the
components and configuration of the BHA designed,
for each application will be different. The key
components and functions of the relevant tool strings
are
• Bit
• Downhole motor
• Drilling head
connector
check valve assembly
release joint
circulating sub
• Drill collars (typically for vertical
wells; non-magnetic collars for
directional tools)
• Directional drilling tools
• Special application tools
An important part of the well-planning process relates

to determining the optimum drilling parameters. The
objective is to identify (estimate) the combination of
bit design, weight-on-bit, and rate of penetration that
will produce the most cost-efficient drilling
performance (i.e., typically the lowest cost per foot
drilled).
In its simplest form, achieving optimal performance

is a compromise of two extremes:
1. Drill at the highest possible ROP for as

long as the bit lasts (priority given to
ROP), or
2. Maximize bit life and minimize "non-

drilling" time, e.g., tripping to change out
bits (priority given to bit life).
During the well planning phase, the task is to

determine the point within these two extremes that
produces the lowest cost per foot drilled. The cost
per foot is a function of: 1) bit costs, 2) trip time
costs, and 3) rig operating costs (for the time
required to drill a given footage).
2.7 DRILLING FLUIDS AND WELLBORE

HYDRAULICS
Overview
Drilling fluid, or mud, can have a major influence in

the success of any drilling operation. Optimization of
the drilling fluid and associated hydraulics is very
important. In CTD operations, the geometry of the
CT string and the configuration of wellbores typically
drilled present many challenges to drilling fluid
performance. However, the unique features
associated with CT equipment and related pressure-

control equipment simplify many of the requirements

of the drilling fluid and the circulation system. CTD is
challenged by an inability to rotate the string, small
annular clearances in the open hole, low annular
velocities inside casing, high fluid friction losses in
the long CT reel, low initial weight on bit (WOB), and
diminishing weight transfer while drilling. In this
section the following will be discussed:
1. Drilling fluid design
2. Hole cleaning and annular

velocity
3. System hydraulics program
The drilling fluid selection process is principally

based on the lithology and pore pressures
anticipated over the wellbore section to be drilled.
Significant changes in either of these parameters
may require that the operation be completed in
distinct sections (casing points) including the
necessary changes in drilling fluid characteristics.
Drilling fluid density is generally specified for each
wellbore section and typically represents a
compromise between anticipated pore pressure and
the fracture gradient of the formation being drilled.
Such a delicate balance is necessary to avoid too
little wellbore hydrostatic pressure – risking a fluid
inflow or kick – or too much hydrostatic pressure –
resulting in formation breakdown, drilling fluid losses
and possible permeability impairment of reservoir
sections. Fracture gradients predicted during the
well design phase are generally confirmed during the
drilling operation by performing leak-off tests. In
CTD operations, fluid selection must also take
account of high friction losses encountered in the CT
string and the difficulties of cuttings transport at
relatively low annular velocities.
In reviewing drilling fluids, it is important also to

consider the circulating system. It is only through
successfully combining the equipment and practices
of the circulating system with an appropriate drilling
fluid that an optimized performance will be achieved.
Selecting the appropriate drilling fluid incorporates
the basic functions of the fluid as listed below:
Figure 14. Hole Cleaning Problems
• Cuttings transport. Removing cuttings

and drilling debris from the wellbore,
including horizontal open-hole sections
with small annuli and vertical cased hole
sections of relatively large diameter, is
critical to success. An efficient cuttings
removal process also requires that the
carrier fluid and cuttings be easily
separated at surface.
• Cool and lubricate. The bit and motor

will quickly overheat and prematurely fail
if not adequately cooled and lubricated by
an appropriate drilling fluid. An additional
lubricating function important to the non-
rotating CT string enables the smooth

and controlled application of downhole

force, i.e., in long horizontal intervals
where sliding the CT string results in a
slip-stick motion.
• Well control. In conventional rotary

drilling, the drilling fluid column exerts
sufficient hydrostatic pressure to maintain
a safe overbalance pressure on reservoir
fluids. This is less critical with CT
because the pipe can be moved while
containing the pressure at the surface.
• Wellbore stability. Maintaining a stable

wellbore requires that the following
conditions are controlled or prevented.
washing out formation while drilling,

e.g., unconsolidated formations
sloughing or caving of unstable

formations, e.g., sloughing shales
reaction of sensitive formations to

drilling fluid, e.g., swelling clays
isolating drilling fluids from the

formation, e.g., create filter cake
• Buoyancy. Significant buoyancy forces

affect the drill string, which can either
help or hinder progress depending of the
application and wellbore conditions.
• Protecting the drill string and casing.

In some CTD applications there may be a
tendency for localized wear of the string
at contact points with the casing or
wellbore tubulars.
• Transmitting hydraulic power. The

downhole motor (and some tools) used in
CTD applications are powered by the
drilling fluid. Characteristics of the fluid
must be compatible with the operation of
the motor or tool, e.g., solids content.
• Corrosion control. The CT string,

tubing or casing and drilling equipment
may require protection from corrosive
formation or reservoir fluids. Similarly,
the selected fluid should be compatible
with the component materials present in
the string, BHA and circulation system.
• Optimizing penetration rate. There are

many variables that contribute toward an
optimized rate of penetration (ROP).
Drilling fluid parameters can be relatively
easily changed. Consequently, changing
drilling fluid parameters might be viewed
as a convenient means of optimizing
ROP. On the other hand, hole cleaning
may be the dominant issue, and dictate
fluid design (regardless of ROP).
• Compatibility. Although not strictly a

fluid function, it is essential that drilling
fluids (including additives) be compatible
with BHA, wellbore and pumping
equipment materials, e.g., elastomers
such as seals and motor stators.
While the functions summarized above apply to most

drilling techniques, there are operating principles or
practices that influence fluid performance and require
a different approach to drilling fluid design for CTD
applications.
• There is the tendency for cuttings to

settle on the low side of the hole. In
conventional drilling, rotation of the drill
string and annular velocity of the fluid
causes cuttings to stay suspended and
be carried to the surface. The absence of
tubing rotation in CTD means that cutting

beds will almost always be present in

horizontal and highly deviated wellbores.
The procedure should recommend
frequent short trips over the drilled
section while circulating to help keep
these beds moving along the hole and
avoid severe build-up. Alternatively, use
a circulating valve and controlled velocity
pumping.
• In CTD operations, the distance the

drilling fluid travels through the drilling
tubular remains constant, regardless of
depth, i.e., the length of the CT string.
Therefore as part of the design the CTD
Engineer needs to be aware of the shear
in the CT and BHA causing breakdown of
the long polymer chains and affecting the
carrying capacity of the fluid.
• The relatively low WOB and high rate of

rotation associated with CTD applications
creates small cuttings.
• When drilling underbalanced, produced

fluid will supplement the drilling fluid flow
rate to assist with cuttings transport and
hole cleaning.
Drilling fluids for overbalanced operations are

typically sophisticated products that are engineered
and carefully prepared for specific wellbore and
formation/reservoir conditions. Therefore the CTD
Engineer should work closely with the fluid supplier
to ensure all fluid characteristics of the project are
met. Drilling fluids (not including foams or two-phase
fluids) typically are comprised of four principal
ingredients:
1. Base component – water or oil forming

the bulk fluid volume
2. Active solids – colloidal solids used to

increase the fluid viscosity, e.g., clays
(bentonite)
3. Inactive solids – inert solids added to

increase the fluid density, e.g., barite
(typically not used in CTD because of the
small clearances in the BHA equipment)
4. Lubricants and Chemical additives – a

wide range of chemical additives are
commonly used to impart the appropriate
drilling fluid properties for the specific
application, e.g., dispersant, pH control,
corrosion inhibitors. Drilling fluid
chemicals are commonly categorized as
organic or inorganic. Lubricants are used
to aid in lowering friction between the
open hole and the CT for better sliding
and weight transfer.
The formulation and proportion of these components

determine the properties of the drilling fluid, the
principal characteristics of which can be summarized
as follows.
• Density. Fluid density is tailored to

provide the required hydrostatic pressure,
under downhole conditions, to prevent (or
control) influx of formation fluids into the
wellbore.
• Rheology. Rheology is the study of the

flow and deformation of fluids. The ease
with which a drilling fluid can be pumped
(fluid friction) and the ability of the fluid to
transport solids (cuttings) are key
characteristics determined by controlling
fluid rheology.
• Filtrate. In overbalanced conditions,

drilling fluids are designed to deposit a

controlled filter cake on the permeable

wellbore surface. Once in place, this
sheath prevents further influx of drilling
fluid or filtrate to the formation.
• Chemical inhibition. The drilling fluid

should be chemically stable and should
not react unfavorably with wellbore
materials, formation fluids or formation
solids. A wide range of chemicals are
available to control or prevent
undesirable drilling fluid reactions.
• Solids content. The action of drilling

creates small particulates which, if not
controlled, may adversely affect drilling-
fluid performance (density and rheology)
or operation of pumps and motors
(abrasion of key components).
2.7.1 Hole Cleaning and Annular Velocity
Efficient hole cleaning is especially important in CTD

applications since problems can be exacerbated due
to the smaller clearances between the drilling BHA
and wellbore. In general terms, turbulent flow
provides more efficient cleaning and particle-carrying
characteristics but occurs at higher fluid velocities
than laminar flow. Geometries and fluid properties
commonly encountered in CTD operations mean it is
often difficult, and frequently impossible, to achieve
turbulent flow. Maximum flow rate in CTD operations
is typically constrained by the downhole motor
specification and limitations on surface pressure
(related to efforts to minimize CT string fatigue
(Figure 15)).
Figure 15. CT Life with Internal Pressure
Historical rule-of-thumb guidelines for minimum CTD

annular velocities with non-viscosified fluids are 120
ft/min in vertical wellbores and 240 ft/min in
horizontal wellbores. These values may be reduced
for viscosified fluids. However, the scouring action of
non-viscosified fluids in turbulent flow can be
advantageous, especially in horizontal wellbores. A
similar rule of thumb, often applied in preliminary
feasibility studies, recommends that annular velocity
should be at least twice the fall velocity of a particle
in the fluid under review. A general formula for
calculating annular velocity is as follows:
24.5 Q
V=
d12 − d22
where
V = annular velocity (ft/min)
Q = flow rate (gal/min)
d1 = diameter of hole (in)
d2 = diameter of drillstring (in)

Given the number of potential variables in any

fluid/particle/wellbore study, computer models are
typically used to design fluid performance and the
hydraulics program (Figure 16).
Figure 16. Modeling Lightweight Fluid

Hydraulics in the Wellbore (from MTI’s
MUDLITE Model)
2.7.2 Hydraulics Program
The primary purpose of a hydraulics program is to

ensure the drilling operation is conducted in an
efficient manner and within the limits determined
during the design phase. The "program" may vary in
form from a simple, relatively informal check list and
pumping schedule to a computer-based system
providing continuous monitoring, recording and real-
time modeling. In advanced monitoring systems, the
real-time parameters may be displayed alongside the
modeled results to enable design values to be
closely followed. The common objective of
hydraulics programs is that all components, elements
or parameters influencing, or influenced by, the
circulating system are considered and that circulation
of an appropriate fluid at the desired rate and
pressure can achieve the necessary results.
The requirement for a formal hydraulics program

increases as the complexity of the wellbore, tool
string or drilling operation increases. For example,
the effect of pumping high viscosity fluid slugs on the
operation of motors or hydraulically operated
equipment should be understood. Similarly, the
effect or implications of changing fluid parameters on
pump rate and pressure should also be assessed.
Ultimately, it is the impact that any variable may have
on hole-cleaning efficiency that must be assessed
and understood. Key parameters which should be
known or considered for most operating conditions
include the following.
1. Fluid flow rate – pump rate (in), wellbore

returns rate (out)
2. System pressure – circulating pressure

(pump), bottomhole pressure (available at
the tool string), wellhead pressure
Factors which directly or indirectly influence hydraulic

performance and, therefore, the hydraulic program
include:
1. Fluid flow – CT string (ID and length),

geometry of tool-string components,
rheology of drilling fluid(s)
2. Fluid system pressures – separator or

process equipment back pressure,
solids (cuttings) loading

3. Pump capacity – operating (and

maximum peak operating) pressure,
rate and horsepower of the pump
system
4. Fluid capacity and handling – ability to

safely prepare, store and deliver varying
quantities of different drilling fluids at the
desired rate, e.g., if high-viscosity slugs
are to be pumped
5. Fluid processing – on a recirculating

system, the ability to process fluids at
an adequate rate to maintain the
desired solids, gas or reservoir fluid
content is important. Subsequent fluid
conditioning or treatment may also
require a minimum "residence time"
before the fluid is recirculated.
2.8 WINDOW MILLING
One of the operations in the CTD project that

requires significant planning is window milling. The
use of CTD for through-tubing casing exits provides
an economical means of accessing marginal or
bypassed pockets of oil, by avoiding the need to
remove existing completions and eliminating
expensive workovers. Sidetrack re-entry applications
currently completed with CTD techniques include the
following:
Figure 17. CT Window Milling with

Whipstock
1. Through-tubing re-entry with
2. Completion left in place and side-track

below the tailpipe
3. Through-tubing re-entry with completion

left in place and side-track from inside the
tubing
4. Conventional re-entry with completion

pulled and sidetrack from existing
wellbore
Initial well research performed on the project will

indicate whether through-tubing tech-niques can be
used or if conventional techniques are required.
Through-tubing re-entries can only be undertaken
using mill and bit assemblies compatible with the
minimum ID (restriction) in the tubing string or
completion. In some cases, tubing restrictions can
be milled out or cut to allow access for larger mills
and bits. Directional and non-directional deepenings
and sidetracks may generally be undertaken through
completion strings of 3½ in. or greater. The resulting
drain hole is generally 3 in. for the 2¾-in. tools and
4⅛ in. for the 3-in. directional tools, depending on the
minimum restriction.
Through-tubing re-entry techniques have special

significance in applications where completion
removal is uneconomical or impractical. The
constraints associated with working within the
completion tubulars generally preclude conventional
rigs and equipment from this type of operation.

There are three basic techniques that can be used to

kick off and mill a casing or liner window:
1. Cement kick-off
2. Conventional whipstock
3. Through-tubing whipstock
Merits and shortcomings of each should be weighed,

along with the specific circumstances of the well to
determine which method is best suited. Some
circumstances to be considered are:
• Is this a cement kick off below a tubing

tail?
Is there a nipple or restriction in the

tubing tail that must be milled out or
removed?
How much rat hole is available?

How much distance is there between
the tubing tail and the top perforation?
Is the area for the window in a high

build portion of the wellbore?
What is the history of work done in the

perforated zone? Will it require
additional cement or additives to
bridge off the perforations?
Where is the window in relation to the

gas cap?
Will this window be milled through two

different tubular sizes (i.e., tubing and
casing or two overlapping casing
strings)?
Will this be a low side or high side

window?
What are future plans? Can I leave

enough room for another sidetrack?
• Is this a through-tubing whipstock

window?
Do perforations need to be squeezed

before setting the whipstock or can
they be squeezed afterwards or at all?
Will the whipstock be set in or below

the perforations?
What is the condition of the liner or

casing to be set in?
Is there a nipple or restriction in the

tubing tail that must be milled out?
Can this whipstock be set on wireline

or does CT need to set?
Can the whipstock be oriented in the

desired direction?
Is a whipstock available that will pass

the required restriction and set in the
casing?
Is the whipstock the right one for the

weight casing in this well and has
casing weight been verified?
Can this window be milled in one step

or is two-step method required?
• Is this a conventional whipstock window?
Do perforations need to be squeezed

before setting the whipstock or can
they be squeezed afterwards or at all?

Will the whipstock be set in or below

the perforations?
What is the condition of the liner or

casing to be set in?
Can this whipstock be set on wireline

or does CT need to set?
What fluids will be required to kill the

well?
Can the whipstock be oriented in the

desired direction?
• Has a CBL been run in the area of the

window?
• Is there sufficient cement bond behind

the casing string to be milled?
• Is a block squeeze required prior to

milling the window?
• Is the well vertical, deviated or horizontal

at the depth of the window?
2.9 OPEN-HOLE LOGGING
Due to the small clearances between logging tools

and the open-hole diameter, open-hole logging has
been kept to a minimum. However, tools have been
and are continuing to be developed for logging in
these smaller diameters and used while drilling
(mainly in a measurement-after-drilling (MAD) pass
mode). The Reservoir Engineer, Geologist and CTD
Engineer should discuss in detail the logs needed
versus the logs requested. Different wellbore
circumstances will dictate the logs required or
feasible for a particular project. Availability of the
tools when required is a question that needs
attention up front.
Objectives of the well must be kept in mind

particularly while discussing logging operations.
Generally, an agreement is reached, based on the
hole conditions, to go (or not go) forward with
logging. Also, depending on logging tool length and
hole conditions, it may be decided to perform one or
multiple logging runs. Most logging operations in
CTD require a gamma-ray and neutron log which can
be obtained through the liner before perforating,
thereby avoiding any need for open-hole logs. A
resistivity log, if required, will have to be run in the
open hole. Any precautions necessary for particular
tools should be discussed while planning the log runs
(e.g., if differential sticking is possible, be aware of
the weak point in the logging string so as not to leave
a fish in the hole; when radioactive source is in the
riser, precautions must be made for emergency
situations where personnel must pass the source
while evacuating).
2.10 WELLBORE TUBULARS AND

WELLHEADS
Casing strings are run to prevent collapse of the

wellbore and to act with the cement sheath to isolate
and separate producing formations. Size and
specification of the casing string are optimized based
on expected productivity and must be designed to
withstand internal and external forces associated
with completion, corrosive environments and forces
associated with running the casing. The casing
string is typically designed from "the inside out," i.e.,
a design that is based on providing a stable wellbore

of a size which optimizes the total fluid production

over the life of the well (including the possibility of
artificial lift later in the life of the well).
The design process is typically comprised of four

principal steps or phases:
1. Determine the length and size of all

casing strings that are needed to produce
the well to its maximum potential
2. Calculate the pressure and loads from

predicted production and operations such
as stimulation, thermal application and
secondary recovery
3. Identify any corrosive fluids or

environments to which the casing string
will be exposed and select appropriate
alloys or protection systems
4. Determine the weight and grade of casing

that will satisfactorily resist all
mechanical, hydraulic and chemical
forces applied
Table 3 shows common casing/bit-size

combinations.
Table 3. Typical Casing/Liner and Bit

Combinations (inches)
If a casing string is not hung from the surface, but is

hung from a point downhole, it is called a liner.
Production liners are permanent liners run through
the productive interval. On a new completion, these
liners will typically be hung from a liner hanger with
approximately 300 ft of overlap into the casing string
through which it is run and cemented in place. On
CTD through-tubing sidetracked wells, the liner is
typically brought back up to above the production
tubing tail and cemented in place (no liner hanger is
used). The top of the liner needs to be designed
such that it is away from any downhole restrictions
and is at a point where it can be retrieved/fished if
necessary. In the through-tubing application, a flush-
joint type connection is utilized on the liner to
facilitate passage of the restrictions in the wellbore,
the window, and the open-hole doglegs. Because of
this string design, the use of centralizers/turbolizers

is needed to help with stand-off from the open-hole

wall and provide for good circulation of cement
around the pipe. A good rule of thumb for the
designed spacing of the centralizers in the liner is
one every joint in the horizontal section and one
every other joint in the build section to 200 ft above
the window.
2.10.1 Wellheads
The wellhead is a generic term used to describe the

surface equipment from which the well is constructed
during drilling operations. The Xmas tree or valve
array used to control the well during production is
mounted above the wellhead and is typically
obtained from the same manufacturer to ensure
compatibility. The primary functions of most
wellheads include:
• Suspend and secure wellbore tubulars

(casing and tubing)
• Provide a hydraulic seal between casing

strings
• Provide access port(s) to casing or tubing

annuli
• Provide a secure and pressure-tight

mounting for the Xmas tree or surface
flow control devices
Wellhead specification and configuration can be an

issue when designing and executing CTD operations
in two principal areas:
1. Design and configuration for new well

applications
2. Ensuring compatibility of existing

wellheads (flanges and connections) for
rig-up of pressure control equipment for
re-entry applications
Components of a typical wellhead include the

following:
• Casing head • Casing spool
• Casing hanger • Crossover flange
• Tubing head • Tubing hanger
• Xmas tree
Following are examples of casing/wellhead

configurations for a CTD new well and a re-entry.
2.10.1.1 New Well
The largest feasible hole size for CTD techniques is

generally 12¼ inches. The most common hole size
for new drills is 6½ in. A new well might begin with a
joint of 13⅜-in. casing set at surface, pile driven or
surface drilled by a water-well rig depending on
wellsite conditions and local equipment availability.
An example of new well casing/wellhead

configurations are as follows:
Example 1
Step 1:
13⅝-in. flange welded on 13⅜-in.

casing stub
13⅝-in. casing spool (or a 13⅝-in.

casing head can be attached directly
to the top of the casing stub by

screwing or welding. This would serve

as the casing spool).
13⅝- by 13⅝-in. drilling spool with two

outlets
BOP (either 13⅝-in. ram or single

annular, depending on setup)
CTD riser with bottom and top

adaptors to suit
With the 12¼-in. hole section drilled, the next casing

string (9⅝ in.) is hung off from the 13⅝-in. casing
spool. The configuration is as follows:
Step 2:
13⅝-in. flange on 13⅜-in. casing

13⅝-in. casing spool
11-in. casing spool
11-in. drilling spool with two outlets
11-in. BOPs (ram or annular)
adaptors to suit
The 8½-in. hole section is drilled and 7-in. casing

run to provide the following configuration.
Step 3:
13⅝-in. flange on 13⅜-in. casing

13⅝-in. casing spool
11-in. casing spool
7-in. casing spool
7-in. drilling spool with two outlets
7-in. BOPs (either ram-type or
annular)

adaptors to suit
The well is now ready for the final drilling phase and
completion process, i.e., tubing hanger and Xmas
tree installation.
2.10.1.2 Re-entry Well
Re-entry CTD operations are typically performed on

wellbores having an existing wellhead. This requires
that the CTD pressure-control equipment be installed
on the production tree (as in conventional CT service
applications). If the existing wellhead configuration
causes the BOP stack to be too tall for the
substructure the tree can be removed and the
pressure-control equipment installed on the lower
master valve. Typical spool size/tubing combinations
are:
• 7-in. spool for 3½-in. production tubing or

smaller
• 9-in. spool for 4½- to 5½-in. production

tubing, or
• 11-in. spool for larger sizes such as 7- or

9⅝-in. production tubing
Standard drilling spools, casing spools, and

crossover spools are available in a wide range of
sizes and pressure ratings. The CTD riser assembly
will be configured to suit the equipment in use, i.e.,
size, rating and functionality.

2.11 LINER CEMENTING
Running and cementing liners with CT is a relatively

new operation in the petroleum industry. Cementing
liners with CT combines aspects of conventional liner
cementing, slim-hole cementing, and deviated
wellbore cementing. Liner sizes are generally small,
ranging between 2⅜- and 5½-in. OD. Liner lengths
are typically about 500 to 2000 ft. Annular
clearances are generally between 0.3125- and
0.625-in. Some common annular clearances are:
2⅜-in. liner inside a 3-in. hole gives an annular
clearance of 0.3125-in.; 2⅞-in. liner inside a 4⅛-in.
hole gives a 0.625-in. annular clearance. Maximizing
this clearance in the design of the well is crucial to
the cement slurry design.
The cement slurry design for a CT liner operation

includes some special properties. These properties
allow it to be mixed and pumped at the rates needed
to ensure good displacement of the drilling fluid;
allow for adequate fluid-loss control; and in many
cases, control gas migration. The following design
parameters are particularly important to CT liner
cementing, and are provided, along with
recommended ranges of values, as general
guidelines. Specific situations may require
specialized testing and design parameters.
• Thickening time – mixing time

(generally 1-2 hr) + pumping time for
cement placement + static time (releasing
from liner) + safety factor (generally 1-2
hr). Total time in general is 4-6 hr.
• Fluid loss – industry standard

requirement for liners is to design the
slurry with a fluid loss less than 50 cc/30
min. This guideline applies for CT liners
as well. If annular gas migration is likely,
lower the designed fluid loss to
approximately 20 to 30 cc/30 min.
Table 4. API Fluid-Loss Guidelines for CT
Liner Cementing
CT Liner Operation API Fluid

Conditions Loss
(cc/30 min)
No gas migration potential 50 to 80
Low gas migration potential 30 to 50
Moderate to high gas 20 to 30

migration potential
• Rheological properties –
recommendations for rheological
properties for CT liners are:
plastic viscosity less than 50 at BHCT

yield point – maximum: 20lbm/100 ft2
2
at BHCT; minimum: 5 to 6 lbm/100ft
at BHCT
• Compressive strength –
recommendations are as follows:
final strength: 2000 to 3000 psi

minimum com-pressive strength: 500
psi in 12 hours
• Free water and settling – required

parameters are 0.

Once these parameters are determined for the

particular project, it is imperative that both a
laboratory design and computer design be
performed. Simulation will determine the appropriate
flow rates that can be pumped during the cementing
process and ensure that the displacement process is
optimized. A simulator must be used to calculate the
hydraulic pressure schedule that will occur during the
job (Figure 18).
Figure 18. Modeling Pressures for Pumping

Cement Stages (from MTI’s CEMENT Model)

3. PRE-JOB PLANNING – ON-SITE
Overview
On-site preparation and planning is the point in the

operation where field personnel become involved and
provide input to the project to ensure a complete
understanding of the well objectives. This understanding
is reached by performing several tasks which include
review of the procedure and well data, pre-spud meeting,
pre-rig work, rig move in and set up, review of equipment
and maintenance records, and review of contingencies
and procedures. The pre-spud meeting is where any
special needs for the upcoming well are noted, such as
special bits or equipment requiring shipment. Any
problems or questions about the well and/or objectives
should be discussed and answered at this meeting. After
the procedures and well are fully discussed, the CTD
Supervisor should be prepared to begin the preparation
work and ensure the location is prepared for the rig.
The CTD Supervisor should make all necessary

notifications to the regulatory representative and any
equipment vendors or suppliers when the rig begins its
rig-up process. Besides procuring the proper equipment,
the CTD Supervisor ensures the maintenance, inspection,
and testing of the equipment are performed and
completed. All of the equipment should have updated
maintenance records, inspection records, insurance
verification and certification of rating for conditions in
which it will be used. In particular, a record of the history
of the usage and storage of the CT must be reviewed.
As a further precaution, any contingency plan needs are

discussed and procedures written to be included with the
main procedure. Responsibilities for coordinating and
conducting the contingency plans are determined prior to
the starting of the CTD operation. Also, assurance of
availability of adequate material and equipment to
implement contingency measures is made and
documented.
3.1 WELL PLANNING/PREPARATION
The on-site planning and preparation of the well is the

major point at which the CTD Supervisor needs to ensure
that, from the field point of view, there is a complete
understanding of the well objectives. The CTD
Supervisor needs to review the procedure in detail,
making note of any questions or problems foreseen from
the procedure to reaching the stated objectives.
A discussion of the proposed wellbore preparation with

the CTD Engineer/procedure author must take place prior
to any activity on the well. During this discussion, any
special needs should be noted for the upcoming well such
as special bits or equipment that will require shipment.
As a follow-up to this discussion, the CTD Supervisor
should review the following well data:
• Well history file for important items such as
PBTD tags (soft or solid? were the last

three consistent? sample taken?)
Tubing or liner obstructions

Fish left in hole
Subsurface safety valve removed; open or
closed status if tubing retrievable
Profile modifications
How perforations react to fluid injection
Gas-lift valves (live or dummies)

3. Pre-Job Planning – On-Site
Shut-in tubing pressures

Are perforations plugged and abandoned?
Do they need to be?
• Well schematic for key items such as
Maximum hole angle

Tubing and liner internal dimensions
Minimum internal dimensions
Gas-lift mandrels
Type of subsurface safety valve
Tubing tail detail
Profile modifications
Pack-off gas-lift mandrels (POGLM's),
tubing patch, or straddle
A pre-spud meeting should be planned between the CTD

Engineer and the CTD Supervisor to include all involved
parties in a review of the planned work and objectives.
This meeting should include the CTD contractor, the
directional driller, reservoir engineer, geologist, bit
company representative, and fluid company
representative. All aspects of the well should be
discussed in detail from the geology to the completion of
the well. Any concerns or changes stemming from this
meeting should be assigned to the appropriate individual
and a date for assigned for reporting back to the CTD
Engineer.
The CTD Supervisor should coordinate any downhole

preparation work that is needed with the CTD Engineer
and ensure that all work is performed, reported and
recorded. Copies of all work performed and the records
of that work should be sent to the CTD Supervisor. He
needs to check for a recent corrected PBTD tag by slick
line or E-line, and review tag depths with previous tags for
consistency. Dummy gas-lift valves are preferred in the
gas-lift mandrels, but are not always necessary.
The following tasks need to be performed prior to moving

the rig to location:
1. Verify that a recent mechanical integrity tubing

analysis (MITA) has been performed and
passed.
2. Ensure the well is dead and all downhole pre-

CTD rig work is complete
3. Ensure a back-pressure valve is installed, the

flow line and wellhead removed if necessary,
leaving the master valve
4. Inspect roads, bridges, overhead lines and

locations and identify any weight or height
limitations
5. Inspect location for any hazards, e.g.,

electrical fire, environmental, etc.
6. Locate and mark underground flow lines,

power cables, injection lines and ground wires
7. Request equipment to level the well site in

preparation for the rig move
8. Submit a rig move form 24 hours in advance

or as required by the regulatory agent and
verify that the proper departments are
informed
9. If an offshore operation (Figure 19):

Figure 19. Offshore CT Operation
review platform deck loading constraints as

specified in the construction drawings
Identify Class I, Division 1 and 2 hazard

areas on the platform as outlined in API RP
500
Determine the crane lifting capacity and the

maximum practical load limits relative to
boom length and load placement radial
distance from pedestal. Crane inspection,
testing, maintenance records and operator
qualifications must be present on location.
Identify deck space constraints for

equipment rig up and propose a
preliminary plan for equipment placement.
Identify any areas with general hazards;

mark or replace as necessary.
Prepare for potential consequences and

hazards resulting from proposed well work.
The following notifications should be made:
1. MWD supplier needs to be on location at least

4 hours prior to picking up MWD tools
2. Notify regulatory representative 24 hours prior

to BOP test
3. Bit companies as needed
4. Directional driller
5. Production Field Superintendent/Engineer

prior to removing wellhead
6. Perforating and logging company
7. Liner equipment supplier
8. Send the Cement Company a copy of the

cement procedure
Move rig and set up
1. The driller should notify the regulatory agency

prior to moving
2. Request transportation to move low boy,

geologist shack and MWD trailers to location
as needed
3. Ensure that a triplex and air compressor are

brought to location. Light plants and heaters
as needed in the winter (Figure 20).

Figure 20. Winterized CT Rig
4. Spot three return tanks and two or three

upright tanks (two for water in summer and
one extra for MeOh in winter, if necessary)
5. Fill two uprights and rig pits with fresh water

for cement P&A (heated fresh water if in cold
climate)
3.2 CT MANAGEMENT AND SAFE OPERATIONS
Overview
There are several conditions that may affect CT string

reliability as a direct result of inadequate care and
attention (maintenance). In the majority of cases, the
consequences are not immediate, but instead will lead to
a rapid worsening of condition (e.g., accelerated fatigue)
and ultimately result in string failure significantly before
predicted or anticipated. The principal objectives of pre-
and post-job maintenance procedures are to:
1. Prevent or control internal and external

surface corrosion that may affect string
performance
2. Prevent restrictions to the work-string drift

diameter
CT Management
The CTD contractor should ensure that the tubing and

equipment have been properly maintained and prepared
for the CTD operation. Prior to arrival on location, the
following should be performed or provided to the CTD
Supervisor and/or Engineer.
• The service history of the CT string should

be established, including the remaining
bend-cycle fatigue life (and maximum
pumping pressures), exposure to acids or
other corrosive chemicals and detection or
observation of surface defects and pipe
deformity.
• CT should be cleaned and flushed prior to

dispatch to location. Additional pickling may
be required to remove debris from the

tubing. Any acid should be displaced with a

neutralizing soda ash solution and sand pills
for scouring the ID of the CT should be
displaced with fresh water (it’s important that
no salts remain in the string) and elastomer
plugs (where possible).
• CT and the service reel must be pressure

tested to at least the maximum anticipated
surface pumping pressure and held for a
minimum of 30 minutes.
• Displace fluid in the CT with nitrogen and

allow the pressure to bleed down to maintain
a nitrogen blanket in the CT string.
• Use an approved storage inhibitor.
One of the key factors for string life is storage and

maintenance. The rigorous quality checks and tests
performed by the manufacturer ensure a competent CTD
string when first used. However, the mode of operation
for most CTD projects seems to frequently be a “one-of”
type of operation, where CT is used for a job and then
stored for several months before being used for another
project. Careful management and inventory of the CT at
this point will significantly reduce the cost of the project.
When CT is to be stored, even for a relatively short period

of time, several considerations should be made to ensure
that the work string and associated documentation
package are kept in satisfactory condition. CT made of
carbon steel materials that can quickly corrode when
exposed to atmospheric, industrial and marine
environments. Such corrosion can occur on the inside of
the tubing (internal corrosion), as well as on the outside
(external corrosion).
Internal corrosion has an obvious detrimental effect on

the working life of a CT string. Small amounts of moisture
condensing inside the tubing can cause localized
corrosion, leading to thinning of the tubing wall and stress
risers. An internal corrosion inhibitor is applied to ensure
that the CT is delivered in a condition as close to as-
manufactured as possible. This inhibitor protects the CT
under various transportation and storage conditions, but
does not adversely affect tubing performance.
Once the string has been used, protection of the ID

begins with the flushing and neutralizing of the reel
contents. Subsequent purging with nitrogen is frequently
required to allow safe loading and transportation of the
reel. Whenever possible and practical, reels should be
blown dry with nitrogen to minimize the residual fluid
which collects at the bottom of the tubing wraps.
Currently, for storage the CT manufacturer recommends
that the ID and OD be coated with Nalco 9281A or
equivalent corrosion inhibitor.
As with internal protection, inhibitors are used to keep

corrosion to a minimum on the outside of the CT string.
To prevent surface rust, the following conditions must be
met:
1. The tubing surface must be clean and free

from corrosive fluids or moisture.
2. A suitable protective coating must be applied

to the entire tubing surface.
3. The coating must not interfere with the

operational use of tubing, measurement or
well control equipment.

4. The coating and its means of application must

not cause a hazard to personnel or
environment.
5. The best external protection can only be

applied to the tubing’s OD as it is being
spooled onto the reel (either during operation
or during maintenance procedures).
Fatigue damage, as a result of internal pressure and

bending cycles, is the primary consideration when
attempting to define the useful life of a CT string.
However, fatigue is an unusual parameter since it cannot
be measured and must be predicted. The computer
models feature complex mathematical algorithms that
were derived from an extensive CT fatigue testing
program. This model calculates the damage that occurs
to the tubing due to the sequence of pressure and
bending cycle. By analyzing the cumulative data for a CT
string, the model can predict when the first cracks in the
tubing will be initiated. By applying a safety factor to this
prediction, the CT string may be withdrawn from service
before a fatigue-induced operating failure occurs.
To provide data for the computer model to function

effectively, the following parameters must be accurately
recorded during every operation.
1. Bending cycles
2. Pressure cycles
3. Major and minor diameters
4. Chemical environment
5. Flow rate
With these parameters input to a model, a plot can be

made to display the percentage tubing life versus the
length of the string (Figure 21). Most models incorporate
a means of inputting the proposed pumping and tubing
movement schedules for the intended operation. The
resulting plot may then be analyzed to verify the ability of
the CT string to safely complete the operation within the
fatigue limits of the string. CT work strings containing
tubing elements that have been used in excess of 95%
should typically be removed from service to allow repair
or replacement.
Figure 21. Modeling CT Fatigue for Planned

Operation (from MTI’s CTLIFE Model)

3.3 HYDRAULICS
The CTD Supervisor along with the CT Operator and Tool

Pusher must determine the optimal hydraulics for the
CTD project. A hydraulics program should be used to
ensure that the drilling operation is conducted in an
efficient manner and within the limits determined during
the engineering design process. It can take the form of a
simple, informal checklist and pumping schedule or of a
computer-based system providing continuous monitoring,
recording and real-time modeling. The objective of the
hydraulics program is that all components, elements or
parameters of the circulating system are reviewed and
checked so that circulation of an appropriate fluid at the
desired rate and pressure achieves the required results.
Ultimately, the effect that any variable has on the hole
cleaning efficiency must be assessed and understood.
There are some important parameters that must be
considered for most operating conditions:
• Fluid flow rate – pump rate (in), wellbore

returns rate (out)
• System pressure – circulating pressure

(pump), bottomhole pressure (available at the
tool string), wellhead pressure
Factors which directly or indirectly influence hydraulic

performance include:
• Bottom-hole and surface temperature

(ambient)
• Fluid flow – CT string (ID and length),

geometry of tool string components, rheology
of drilling fluid(s)
• Fluid system pressures – separator or process

equipment back pressure, solids (cuttings)
loading
• Pump capacity – operating (and maximum

peak operating) pressure, rate and
horsepower of the pump system
• Fluid capacity and handling – ability to safely

prepare, store and deliver varying quantities of
different drilling fluids at the desired rate, e.g.,
pumping high viscosity slugs; pumping crude
to free stuck pipe
• Fluid processing – on a recirculating system,

the ability to process fluids at an adequate
rate to maintain the desired solids, gas or
reservoir fluid content is important.
Subsequent fluid conditioning or treatment
may also require a minimum "residence time"
before the fluid is recirculated
The crew must be kept informed of the operational limits

of the circulating system and given the guidelines that are
not to be exceeded without approval of the CTD
Supervisor. Any necessary remedial action to the system
should be discussed before proceeding with the drilling
project.
3.4 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
In addition to procuring the proper equipment, ensuring

that maintenance and inspection of the equipment is
performed and completed is a top priority for starting the
project. The CTD Supervisor must ensure that the proper
documentation operation and maintenance manual is
available for each piece of surface equipment.
Documentation for the equipment should include
1. A copy of the applicable location safety and

loss prevention standards

2. A copy of any applicable local, state or

national regulations, codes or insurance
requirements
3. A copy of the current inspection record
4. A copy of the record of any repairs or changes

to the equipment
5. A certification form indicating the equipment is

rated for the conditions for which it will be
used
6. Certified equipment operators
The CTD contractor should provide the CTD Supervisor

with the maintenance schedule and program for all
equipment supplied. The maintenance schedule should
be adhered to and fully understood by all involved parties.
An inventory of all spare parts is to be maintained by the
CTD contractor and a copy should be provided to the
CTD Supervisor. All critical equipment components are to
have spare parts or replacements available (e.g. pumps,
injector head, CT, crane, BOP). The CTD Supervisor
should perform a pre-job inspection in the CTD
contractor’s yard prior to moving the rig.
All data-acquisition equipment should be calibrated and

the CTD Supervisor should witness the calibration or a
certified document supplied to him for that equipment.
This equipment includes, but is not limited to:
• CT string monitoring
• drilling fluid monitoring
• directional drilling and navigation
• formation evaluation
3.5 CONTINGENCIES
The CTD Supervisor and the CT Operator should meet

and discuss contingencies and the appropriate
contingency measures. The objective here is to attempt
to review possible unplanned events and minimize the
response time or downtime. Due to the complexity of the
CTD operations, contingency planning is required prior to
starting the job. Unplanned conditions that may be
encountered during an operation include emergency
procedures to maintain control of well pressure or surface
equipment. CTU operators must be fully familiar with
these procedures.
The primary areas for contingency plans or guidelines

are:
1. Stuck or damaged drillstring (due to hole

conditions)
2. Open-hole sidetrack
3. Drillstring integrity
4. Open-hole logging
5. BOP equipment
6. Off-bottom drilling practices
7. Lost circulation
8. Liner running and cementing
9. Well control
10. Injector head failure or problems
11. Perforating
Contingency plans for each of these areas must be

developed and fully discussed by the CTD Supervisor and

the CT operator. Most of these areas of problems or

failures will require suspension of the operation pending
repair or replacement. Along with the understanding of
the contingency plans, there should be full agreement
between the CTD Supervisor and the CT operator as to
the responsible party for coordinating and conducting the
contingency plans. The parties should also determine
and ensure that adequate material and equipment are
available to implement the contingency measures. To
supplement the contingency plans, the CTD Supervisor
should document the source and availability of any
special equipment or services for future reference.
3.6 WELL CONTROL
Regardless of the complexity of well-control issues

associated with a drilling operation (underbalanced or
overbalanced), the necessary checks, procedures and
responsibilities must be identified and understood by the
personnel involved. In most cases, it is the responsibility
of the CT driller to ensure that relevant checks are made
and that the data/information on which the drilling
operation is proceeding are current and accurate.
However, to perform this, the CT driller must typically rely
on the assistance of the CTD Supervisor, specialists or
other personnel who should in turn be aware of their
responsibilities and the need for safe drilling practices.
The CT driller and CTD Supervisor together should verify

that adequate well-control equipment and procedures are
in place. Any procedural questions or changes should be
confirmed with the CTD Engineer. The parties must
thoroughly check all well-control equipment and test the
equipment as required prior to moving to location. The
CTD Supervisor should ensure that quality assurance has
been conducted on the well-control equipment and all of
the equipment certified for the project as required.

4. OPERATIONS EXECUTION
Summary
The basic objective of most drilling operations is to

provide a safe, stable wellbore, fit for the intended
purpose and accessing a specific target. CT operations
should be executed with minimal risk to personnel or
equipment, ensuring the pressure integrity of the well at
all times. Maintaining pressure integrity not only requires
that wellbore or reservoir fluids are controlled against
release at surface, but that the fluids are controlled
against uncontrolled cross-flow between high-/low-
pressure zones, or similar damaging conditions. Second
only to the safety aspect of the operation is data
acquisition and quality assurance of the data. There are
numerous parameters that must be monitored and
recorded during the CTD process.
4.1 SAFETY
Safety is JOB ONE in all CTD operations. Because CTD

involves the combination of traditional drilling and CT well
intervention, personnel used for CTD may have limited
experience in one facet or phase of the business, and this
can create situations where risks are not readily identified.
Also, the intermingling of equipment and techniques can
be confusing and create potential hazards. Typically, a
hazard identification and review meeting should be held
with key personnel from both the client and contractor
present. This meeting should review the entire project in
terms of individual tasks and attempt to
identify/eliminate/minimize the risks and hazards. The
CTD Supervisor should develop a safety checklist to suit
the specific needs of the project, but it should be usable
and effective. The purpose of the checklist is to verify that
the equipment and/or procedures are in place and
functioning as intended. The checklist should be
developed to include the following:
• Safety equipment
• Safety procedures
• Safety Management Systems (How the safety

system is managed and monitored for
effectiveness)
• Mechanical review/audit of all equipment
• CT unit and tubing maintenance records
• Emergency procedures
• Alarms
• Communications
• Safety drills
• Safety meetings
• Safety training
• Written instructions
• Posted information
• Regulatory compliance (company and

governmental)
Attachment 1 is an example of a checklist for a project.
Once this verification has been made along with the
responsibilities and assignment of duties, execution of the
project can proceed. All safety drills, records, meetings
and maintenance should be recorded and reported to the
CTD Supervisor. If at any time there are questions or
doubts about the upcoming operation, operations should

4. Operations Execution
be shut down and a safety check/meeting should be held

to ensure a safe operation.
4.2 DATA ACQUISITION
Acquisition of quality data during the CTD operations is

crucial to the success of the well and for future CTD wells.
The importance of proper calibration of the sensors,
meters and data-acquisition devices cannot be over-
emphasized. The CTD Supervisor should obtain a record
of the calibration and function testing of the equipment to
be used before and during the operation. During the
operations, the CTD Supervisor should monitor and
interpret the data from the downhole tools as well as the
surface sensors and meters. This will allow him and the
CTD personnel to quickly identify any deviations of the
operational parameters and act accordingly to avert or
mitigate problems before they arise. Regular monitoring
of the data will also help ensure the quality of the data
being recorded and/or reported. Communications
between the CTD Supervisor and the CTD crew are a
must for quality assurance. Some of the equipment to be
monitored regularly are BOP controls, mud system
sensors and solids removal, gas sensors, BHA
equipment, and CT data-acquisition devices.
Reporting
All necessary reports and logs must be completed in a

timely and accurate manner. Any additional reports
regarding problems or issues during the project should be
completed and collated to enable follow-up of the well
events in a sequential order. Data that should be
reported/recorded continually are fluid properties,
directional data, pump rate and pressure, differential
pressure across the motor, weight on bit, run-in-hole
weight of CT, pull-out-of-hole weight of CT, string weight,
drilling hours on bit/motor, cycle life of CT, rate of
penetration, wellhead pressure and annular pressure.
The CT Driller and CTD Supervisor must be informed
about these data and any changes that occur.
Maintaining efficient communication channels between all

parties will enable quick and proper response to any
changes and allow for a safe operation. The crews
should be briefed on any changes and before all pertinent
activities. CTD requires close coordination between all
the elements that make up the project. It is essential that
everyone knows the operational plan from an overall
viewpoint as well as on a day-to-day basis. Some ideas
for successful information transfer are as follows:
• Develop a comprehensive drilling program

that details each stage of the well, individual
responsibilities, and reporting procedures.
• Hold daily review/planning meetings with key

personnel. Establish daily objectives and
provide instructions.
• Maintain a system of recording events as they

occur. A daily drilling report should be kept,
as well as logs concerning actual drilling
parameters, hole conditions, directional
drilling, mud system, and problems
encountered.
• Ensure that issues are communicated

between shifts as they change over.
• Document the entire well in a detailed end-of-

well report. This report should include all
problems and their resolution and any
suggestions for improvement. (See Chapter 5
– Post-Job Review)

4.3 BOTTOM-HOLE ASSEMBLY AND CT

DEPLOYMENT
Overview
The type of drilling to be done determines the bottom-hole

assembly (BHA) configuration for a particular well. This
section includes the following:
1. A typical BHA
2. A description of each component
3. A discussion of tripping and wiper trips
The CTD Supervisor and the Directional Driller (DD) must

complete a review of the compatibility of the BHA with the
drilling procedure and anticipated formations to be
penetrated. They along with the CTD engineer select the
BHA configuration and make adjustments as drilling
progresses. Each of the involved parties for the BHA
must check and inspect their respective tools for proper
operation prior to making up the BHA. Alignment of the
directional tools and the bent motor, if used, is the
responsibility of the DD and the directional engineer on
location. The DD is also responsible to ensure the BHA
components have been measured and all dimensional
data recorded. All connections in the BHA must be made
up to the torque specified by the manufacturer with some
type of thread lock compound or set screws to help
ensure the connections will not back off. No BHA should
be run into a well until the DD has verified the
dimensional data and confirmed the BHA makeup with
the CT driller and the CTD Supervisor.
4.3.1 Typical Bottom Hole Assembly
A typical BHA is comprised of the following components:
• CT Connector
• Dual Check Valve
• Hydraulic Disconnect
• Circulation Sub
• Non-Rotating Joint
• Orientor
• Drill Collars (may house any required data

acquisition or survey tools)
• Equalizing Sub (for mud-pulse systems)
• Downhole Motor (if directional drilling, with

bent housing)
• Bit
Figures 22 and 23 illustrate key BHA components for
different applications.
Figure 22. Wireline BHA Figure 23. MWD BHA

for Deviated Well for Deviated Well

4.3.1.1 CT Connector (CTC)
Connectors are commercially available in a wide range of

designs and sizes. However, three general categories of
connectors are typically recommended (see Figure 24).
1. Grapple connector
2. Setscrew/dimple connector
3. Roll-on connector
Grapple connectors use a wedge or slip collar

arrangement to lock the CT string inside the connector
housing. A wide variety of designs are available including
single- and bi-directional slip assemblies. A double acting
bi-directional design is recommended since the CTC may
be exposed to significant compression forces in both
directions, i.e., tension/compression. This connector is
used with set screws as back-up in some CTD projects.
A dimple-type connector that is secured to the CT with set

screws is typically used for CTD. A dimpling tool is used
which forms dimples in the CT aligned with the set screw
holes in the connector. The dimple-type connector is
recommended because of its superior ability to withstand
torque, overpull, and drilling shock. Its durability has
been established through repeated field use in high
vibration and impact applications.
The roll-on connector attaches to the internal diameter of

the CT and is held in place by crimping the CT around a
connector profile with a special crimping tool. However,
the roll-on connector poses a significant obstruction to
fluids, darts or balls pumped through the CT.
A profiled neck is also incorporated for contingency

fishing. The CTC is usually replaced once or twice during
drilling operations, but should be checked for signs of
slippage on every trip. Every time the CTC is replaced, a
pull test (equal to 80% of yield strength of CT minus the
weight of the CT) and pressure test (based on tubing
burst and maximum allowable system pressure) should
be performed and documented.
Coiled Tubing
Coiled Tubing O-ring
Setscrew Crimp
ed
Tubing
Setscre
O-ring
O-ring
Grapple Connector Dimple Connector Roll-on Connector
Figure 24. CT Connectors
Note: Extreme care must be exercised with connectors

for larger diameter CT. Ovality and residual curvature of
the CT can significantly reduce connector “grip” when
used with large-diameter, powerful mud motors. Many
standard connectors are not suitable in these
applications.
4.3.1.2 Dual Check Valves
A dual-flapper check-valve system (Figure 25) is utilized

to prevent unwanted migration of wellbore fluids back into

the CT drill string. Tandem check valves are

recommended to provide some redundancy of operation.
The full-bore (or near full-bore) opening permits the use of
more complex CT tools, fluids and operating techniques
by allowing balls, darts and plugs to pass through to the
tool string from the CT without restriction.
Figure 25. CT Check Valves
4.3.1.3 Hydraulic Disconnect
A ball-actuated hydraulic disconnect is located below the

check valves. The disconnect provides the option to
release the BHA should it become stuck in the wellbore.
It is recommended that the hydraulic disconnect be
pinned at a high shear value (about 5000 psi) and a
separate pumping unit be required for disconnecting. For
cases where wireline tools are used, the hydraulic
disconnect cannot be incorporated. Instead, an electrical
disconnect and/or straight pull/shear disconnect is
employed.
4.3.1.4 Circulation Sub
Circulating a ball onto a seat activates the circulation sub.

When opened, the fluid path is diverted above the
measurement-while-drilling (MWD) tools and mud motor,
and directed radially through side exit ports. This is a
“one-shot” opening device (once the circulation ports are
open, they cannot be closed with subsequent balls). The
circulation sub allows increased circulation rates by
eliminating the pressure loss and flow constraints through
the BHA. When tripping out in cased hole, the sub is
normally open to improve cuttings removal. This also
makes circulation to surface possible without concern for
bit or production tubing damage because the bit is not
rotating.
4.3.1.5 Non-Rotating Joint
If it is necessary to deploy the BHA into the well in two or

more sections, a non-rotating joint (Figure 26) will be
required to make up the BHA to the CT string. Once the
lower portion of the BHA is deployed into the well, it is
held in place by the BOP slips. String rotation is then no
longer possible and a splined non-rotating joint is used to
make up this connection. The two pieces slide together
and are interlocked with internal splines to alleviate
rotation. A threaded collar slides over the splined section
to secure the BHA.
4.3.1.6 Orienter and Equalizing Sub
The orienter is required for wells where directional

capability is desired and is designed for use with single-
phase fluids. It rotates or indexes the lower portion of the
BHA to adjust the tool face in the desired direction. A
clutch and cam are incorporated to rotate the tool in a
clockwise direction typically in 15º increments per pump

cycle. As normally configured the orientor generates up

to 500 ft-lbs of torque. The indexing force of the orienter
is derived from the differential pressure inside the orienter
and the annulus pressure outside the orienter. The
greater the differential pressure, the greater the torque
generated by the orienter for rotating the BHA. When
orienting with the choke to increase differential pressure
at the orienter, slow pumps down to ~2 BPM, turn off
pump, open choke, bleed pressure to nearly zero, close
choke and restart pump.
Figure 26. CT BHA

with Non-Rotating
An equalizing sub can be installed below the orienter to

increase the pressure drop through the tool string and
enhance the torque generated. Also, there is a bleed port
that allows for bypass of approximately 10% of the drilling
fluid and allows pressure to equalize below the orienter
that might be otherwise trapped by the motor when the
pumps are shut down. Pressure trapped in the tool string
as a result of the high viscosity mud can prevent the
orienter from cycling.
4.3.1.7 MWD Equipment
The three main components of the MWD system for

single-phase drilling fluid operations are the pulser
generator assembly, directional probe, and gamma-ray
sensor (for single-phase fluids). For most operations with
two-phase fluids, a CT e-line system is used and a pulser
generator is not incorporated in the BHA. When the
components are assembled, they fit inside the non-
magnetic collar which constitutes the MWD system. The
collar in turn is situated below the hydraulic orienter and
above the motor and equalizer sub.
The MWD system provides real-time tool-face data plus

directional survey information to steer the motor bend to
the desired orientation for control of the well trajectory.
The gamma ray sensor is used for geologic steering and
depth control. A resistivity sensor is added in wells where
steering away from water contacts is desired. The pulser
generator assembly provides both electric power for the
directional and gamma sensors as well as hydraulic
power to drive poppet extension for producing positive
pulse telemetry. Drilling fluid pumped down the coil
drives the turbine of the generator. This same fluid is the
medium for pulse telemetry data being transmitted to the
surface computers.
Flex interconnect sondes can be added between

individual tool components as well as flex subs above the
flow tube and orienter. This should allow the bending
moment to occur in the flex area instead of in the rigid
flow sub. It is important to remember that flexibility of

integral components must be maintained for the system to

function properly. Any OD upsets, sharp shoulder
transitions, and BHA stiffness impact CT drilling
dynamics. Decreasing the size has added more flexibility
and flexible components to the BHA and improved drilling.
The most flexible points are 1) in the collar flex area
below the flow sub, 2) in the flex sub above the flow tube
and 3) in the flex sub above the orienter.
The MWD equipment should be made up and torqued by

the MWD personnel on location and should be checked
by the DD and the CT driller. Critical items to check are:
1) the motor/MWD orientation and 2) the orienter
movement. After the collars are made up with correct
torque on connections at bottom and top of the sub,
transfer a scribe line (with a piece of angle iron) from the
hang-off collar down to the top of the motor along the axis
of the bottom scribed collar. The DD and the CT
Supervisor should verify orientation measurements and
numbers. It is recommended that while making up the
drilling BHA, the orienter should be checked for
movement prior to running. Check for movement by
setting the slips on the bottom section of the orienter and
spinning the orienter with a pipe wrench (counter-
clockwise looking down) to ensure that the tool is free to
turn.
For safe drilling of the directional program, the CT crew

must be informed of the directional objectives of the well.
The DD, MWD engineer, CT operator and the CTD
Supervisor should be aware of the drilling parameters and
of any changes in these parameters. Remedial actions
should be discussed, prepared for and performed safely
and as efficiently as possible. If there are any doubts
about the directional drilling and associated parameters,
the operation should be shut down safely and quickly and
the way forward discussed in detail. High-quality data is a
must for directional drilling to proceed effectively. Every
effort should be made by the DD and MWD personnel to
ensure that the data received are accurate and validated
before being used. Because decisions have to be made
quickly in high build holes, it is very important that all
data-acquisition equipment is in good working order. Any
misplaced or unrecorded data could result in failure to
reach the desired target of the well.
4.3.1.8 Downhole Mud Motors
The most commonly used mud motors are 2⅞-in. OD with

a 7:8 lobe ratio and have adjustable bent housings.
Generally they are high flow rate, medium speed motors.
Recommended flow rates are 60-120 GPM and 200-400
rpm. Larger motors can be used depending on the
tubulars to be run through and the open-hole size to be
drilled. Non-magnetic rotor/stator combinations are
available and recommended for use while drilling through
the formation. Use of non-magnetic material reduces
magnetic interference sufficiently to allow steering tools to
be placed within 2 feet of the motor. Conventional steel
motors require the use of 10-15 ft of monel collars below
the directional probe to eliminate magnetic interference,
resulting in bit-to-sensor spacing of 20-25 ft. Bit-to-sensor
spacing is reduced to about 11 ft with non-magnetic
power sections. Wellbore trajectory projections are
greatly improved with shorter bit-to-sensor spacing,
resulting in more precise directional control.
The box-to-bend length for these motors is in the range of

2.9-3.3 ft. For planning purposes, a “theoretical” build
rate of 12.5 x motor bend angle can be used. Field
experience has shown that actual build rates are highly

dependent on the motor/bit combination used. The DD

should know the motor/bit combinations that can be used
for a particular build rate. Some common ranges of build
rates for 2⅞-in. bent motors are shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Build Rates for Bent Motors
Build Rate
Motor Bend
(deg/100 ft)
1.0° 7-13
1.5° 10-25
2.0° 15-35
2.5° 29-36
3.0° 25-40
Recommended drilling parameters that should be

monitored by the DD (as well as the CT Driller and CT
Supervisor) are weight on bit (WOB), differential pressure
and flow rate. Stall pressure for a new motor varies with
size; for 2⅞-in. motors it should be about 1000 psi. As a
general rule, motors should be able to drill for 60 hours
before rebuilding is required. Typically, if the motor
becomes stuck and there is an overpull greater than 20
klb, the motor should be replaced. Surface indicators of
downhole motor problems include low stall pressures and
tagging bottom with good weight transfer, but not seeing
any differential pressure.
If the BHA is pulled and rerunning the motor is planned,

the following should be checked by the DD and CT Driller
and reported to the CT Supervisor:
1. Visually inspect the bent housing to ensure

that the motor setting has not changed down
hole.
2. Check bit for rubber (from stator). If present,

do not rerun motor.
3. Check lower compression coupling by trying

to turn the motor housing section between the
adjustable bent housing and the lower nut
located directly above the output shaft exit
point. If it turns or is loose, do not rerun the
motor.
4. Check the bearings by checking for side-to-

side or up and down movement. If any
movement is noted, do not rerun the motor.
4.3.1.9 Drilling Bits
The bit is often considered the focal point of a drilling

system or assembly since it alone performs the role of
cutting a hole through the rock formation. Just as there
are many types of formations to be drilled, there is an
extensive selection of bit designs and materials, many of
which are designed to suit specific conditions.
Consequently, selection of an appropriate bit is vital to
ensuring optimized drilling results (typically assessed on
ROP). When drilling rock formations, bit size ultimately
determines hole size (diameter). However, formation
movement during and after drilling can result in hole sizes
ranging from significantly over gauge (caving and
washouts) to under gauge (sloughing or tight hole). Only
by combining the bit with an appropriate BHA, drilling
fluids program and the application of "good drilling
practices," will an accurate and stable wellbore be
constructed.

In addition to providing efficient drilling action, bits must

fulfill several other functions.
• Bit face cleaning – enable cuttings or drilled

materials to be removed from the area once
cut
• Hole gauge – create a wellbore not less than

the nominal bit size, throughout the life of the
bit (wear resistant gauge)
• Connect to the BHA – the bit must be securely

and reliably connected to the motor or BHA
To provide these fundamental functions, the majority of

bits (regardless of specific design) contain the following
design elements.
• A cutter assembly or matrix which provides

complete and even drilling action within the
nominal bit circumference
• Ports and nozzles directing drilling fluid

through the bit and around the bit face to
ensure cuttings and debris are removed and
to prevent overheating of cutters or
mechanical components
• “Gauge wear protection", i.e., the hole drilled

at the end of a bit's life should not be smaller
than when new. Typically, hard-face
treatments or hardened material inserts are
used to reinforce friction surfaces.
Experience has shown that the ability to
accurately steer and/or adjust the BHA
trajectory during drilling of a short-radius
build-up section is hindered by long gauge
protection on the bit. This should be
carefully considered during the well-planning
stage of a directional well and specific
aspects of the well (trajectory, build-up rate,
bit-type, etc.) planned accordingly.
• An appropriate tool joint capable of

withstanding the forces exerted by the
bit/drilling system. In addition, some means
of securing the bit for make-up/breakout is
either incorporated into the bit design or
provided for in a separate torque adapter.
Since standard bits come with standard
thread connections, the making up of the bit
to the BHA at the well site can be
problematic due to the required torque
values of the larger connections. A common
practice in such cases is to have the bit pre-
torqued and sent to the well site as part of
the BHA. Otherwise, bits can be torqued at
the well site by laying them out horizontally
and using various mechanical devices, such
as chain tongs, hydraulic tongs or the crane.
This aspect should be recognized and
addressed in the well planning stage.
Typical connections are:
3¾ to 4½ in.; 2⅜ in. API REG

4⅝ to 5 in.; 2⅞ in. API REG
5⅛ to 7⅜ in.; 3½ in. API REG
7½ to 9⅜ in.; 4½ in. API REG
9½ to 14½ in.; 6⅝ in. API REG
On bits that contain moving parts (e.g., roller cone bits),
additional features are required to ensure components
are adequately lubricated throughout the lifetime of the
bit. Because the interaction between bit/motor/formation
is critical to optimized drilling performance, the bit
selection process typically includes consultation with bit
manufacturers/suppliers with the following information or
specifications.

1. Formation type, hardness and abrasiveness
2. Motor torque (high torque motors are

recommended)
3. Motor RPM
4. Available WOB
5. Drilling fluid type and flow rate
To reduce the likelihood of subjecting a bit to damaging

forces, it is essential that a new bit be allowed to establish
its unique bottom-hole cutting pattern, especially when
the type of bit, or bit cutter pattern, has been changed.
Operating procedures should include the following
precautions:
• When approaching bottom, rotation and

circulation should be started to clear any fill
material and prevent plugging nozzles.
• The hole bottom should be lightly tagged with

low RPM, with the RPM and WOB slowly
increased to operating values.
• Circulating pressure should be closely

monitored to ensure that the optimum
bit/motor hydraulic performance is being
achieved. With a constant flow rate,
downhole motors exhibit a differential
pressure between off-bottom and on-bottom.
This differential pressure will have a range
depending on the specific motor size and lobe
configuration, with the lower end being the off-
bottom circulating pressure, and the upper
end the maximum circulating pressure prior to
motor stall. Once the motor stalls, there is an
immediate increase in circulating pressure far
above the upper end of the differential
pressure range. With most motors, it is
possible for an experienced CT operator to
utilize this pressure differential to optimize the
drilling performance of a given bit and motor
for the formation being drilled.
Figure 27. Fixed-Cutter PDC Bit
In CTD, bit speed is often higher while WOB is always

less than in conventional drilling, requiring consideration
of the following factors:
• CTD bits should be compatible with high

speed operation.
• Roller-cone bits, which use a crushing action,

do not operate as efficiently with the lower
WOB inherent with CTD.

• Fixed-cutter bits (Figure 27) require lower

WOB and are better suited for CTD in uniform
formations. However, performance can be
sensitive to WOB fluctuations although, in
general, WOB is more easily controlled with
CTD than with rotary drilling.
• Major variations in WOB may induce stalling

which may impact the reliability and
performance of both the bit and motor.
• Fixed-cutter bits are generally available in

smaller sizes than are roller-cone bits.
• The relatively low flow rates associated with

CTD can have a significant effect on bit
hydraulics, e.g., cleaning efficiency and jetting
effects available at the bit face.
• Gauge protection is important, but should be

considered in terms of steerability in
directional drilling, especially in the build-up
section.
• The ability to backream with CTD is an

important advantage in the drilling operation
and this feature should be built into bits run for
CTD.
4.3.2 Tripping and Wiper Trips
The greatest efficiency gain that CTD has compared to

conventional drilling is tripping speed. Surface equipment
(not downhole conditions) generally limits tripping speed.
The primary surface limitation for running or pulling CT is
the hydraulic pressure to the chains on the injector and
associated wear and tear on the injector equipment.
Tripping speeds in the tubing and casing above the
window should range from 70-120 fpm for 2⅜-in. or
smaller CT. A speed of 70 fpm should be used while
POOH in low gear with a string weight of >30 klb. A
speed of 120 fpm should be used in high gear with a
string weight of <30 klb. Speeds should be intentionally
reduced in the open hole to improve hole cleaning while
POOH and to minimize the chance of sidetracking if a
ledge is tagged while RIH. Some guidelines for tripping
are listed below:
• The hole should be kept full with drilling fluid

at all times. Tripping in tubing and casing
should be done at a low pump rate to
minimize CT fatigue, but high enough to
maintain returns.
• When tripping in the well for the first time with

the drilling BHA, speed should be reduced
while going across any downhole jewelry and
or restrictions. Any problem areas should be
noted and reported to the CT Supervisor.
• A function test of the MWD equipment should

be performed near the surface when RIH to
ensure all equipment is working properly. If
the motor bend is greater than 1.5º, this
shallow-hole test should not be performed
because of possible damage to the bit.
• As the drilling BHA approaches the window

while RIH, pump rate should be shut down or
minimized, and then the BHA run through the
window without the motor turning. If unable to
run through the window without the motor
turning, pull up into the casing, orient to the
tool face at which the window was milled, shut
down pumps again and try to run through the
window. Several attempts may be required to
orient the BHA at the tool face needed to get
through the window. This tool-face direction
should be well documented and reported.
Once the bit is in the open hole, increase to
full pump rate. This process for working the

tool past the window helps prevent bit

damage.
• While running in hole in the open hole,

maintain full pump rate, but reduce the run-in-
hole speed to <50 fpm and be very cautious of
setting down especially in the build section. If
the tools take any weight or if any motor work
is observed, pick up immediately and check
and/or adjust tool face, then proceed in the
hole slowly. If aggressive working of the BHA
is needed to get past a problem area (ledge or
high dogleg areas), it may be necessary to
minimize the pump rate to avoid inadvertently
sidetracking the well.
• Depth control and tie-in are of utmost

importance while performing CTD operations.
A logging pass should be made on the initial
trip in the well with the BHA. This logging
pass should be in the casing above the
whipstock (mechanical or cement) and tied
into the preferred gamma ray log (BHCS or
equivalent). This location or tie-in point
should be used on subsequent tie-ins. The
mechanical whipstock may also have a
radioactive (RA) marker in it for reference that
can also be used. If the RA marker is used,
ensure that the bit is outside the window
before bringing the pumps on to log. It should
be a routine operation to tie in and flag (paint
a mark on) the CT before pulling out of the
hole for a BHA change. Regardless of when
the tie-in log is done, always flag the CT with
the BHA above the window.
Frequent wiper trips may be required to stir the cuttings

so that the drilling fluid can transport them to surface.
(Note: frequent wiper trips reduce CT fatigue life.)
Removal of the cuttings from the open hole is critical for
good weight transfer to the bit, reducing the chance of
stuck pipe, and for optimizing hole conditions for running
and cementing a liner. An added benefit of the wiper trips
is a considerable reduction in CT fatigue life consumed
due to lower pressure inside the CT and less wall friction
in the open hole. Recommended wiper trip guidelines are
as follows:
• A full wiper trip should be made to the

window and back to bottom for every 150-
200 ft of new hole drilled (when drilling
overbalance). A running speed of 20-30 fpm
at full pump rate is recommended. In
horizontal holes, repeat passes or slower
speeds in low points should be made.
• Short wiper trips, typically the length of the

BHA, can be made if there is repeated
stacking of weight at the bit. These short
trips should not be used for general hole
cleaning for which a full wiper trip is
required.
• Once at TD, a full wiper trip with tie-in log at

the window is recommended. Prior to pulling
out of the hole to run the liner and with the
BHA above the window, it is recommended
to drop the ball to open the circulation sub
and lift any solids that have accumulated in
the larger ID casing or tubing.
4.4 DRILLING FLUID
This section addresses fluid properties and fluid handling

in an overbalanced drilling project. (Underbalanced
drilling fluid is discussed in Section 4.10). CTD is
challenged by the inability to rotate the CT string, small
annular clearances in the open hole, low annular
velocities inside the tubing and casing, high fluid friction
losses in the CT, low initial WOB and rapidly diminishing

weight transfer as the hole is drilled. Critical design

criteria for a fluid that meets these challenges include
minimizing formation damage, fluid loss, pump pressure,
and stuck pipe while maximizing cuttings suspension,
cuttings transport, weight transfer, shale stability and
overall hole conditions for successful liner cementing. A
typical recommended fluid for CTD overbalanced drilling
is a solids-free bio-polymer consisting of:
1. Brine based liquid with 5% KCl and 3% NaCl
2. Premium grade, highly clarified Xanthan bio-

polymer
3. Interfacial tension reducer and lubricant
4. A biocide
5. KOH for pH control
“Solids-free” means that no particulate matter is put in the

fluid for either density or fluid loss control. If needed, the
resulting fluid density of 8.8 ppg can be increased to 10
ppg by adding KCl and NaCl. This fluid relies on the
viscoelastic properties (note: viscosity is not a function of
time; when circulation is stopped viscosity rises quickly to
low shear-rate viscosity and remains there; when static
viscosity does not increase) and the increased low shear-
rate viscosity (LSRV) of the fluid to control filtrate
invasion into the formation. The LSRV is measured at
0.0636 sec-1 on a Brookfield viscometer. With a LSRV of
60,000-80,000 cps, leak off to the formation can be
controlled in permeable formations up to 5 darcies. Depth
of filtrate penetration will vary with LSRV, temperature,
overbalance pressure, formation permeability and
formation fluid viscosity. This fluid is able to control fluid
loss at overbalanced differential pressures of 500 psi
under static conditions and 1000 psi while circulating.
It is recommended that this fluid be mixed at the drilling

fluid company’s mixing facility and transported to location,
due to the special shearing and filtering facilities required.
Control parameters for a typical CTD fluid are:
Weight: 8.5-8.9 ppg
LSRV: 60,000-80,000 cps
Lubricant: 3% by volume
PV: 8-9
pH: 9.0-9.5
Even though solids content of the fluid is initially zero,

drilled cuttings that are not removed by solids-control
equipment build up in the system. Increasing levels of
drilled solids will increase PV, pump pressure, chip hold-
down and drag while decreasing ROP and weight
transfer. A linear motion shaker and a high-speed
centrifuge are used to maintain total solids concentration
to below 1%. A new fluid system should be used at the
start of the horizontal section and fluid from the build
section discarded. Once solids content is above 1%, it is
recommended that the fluid be traded for a new fluid
system. Maintenance at the rig of this fluid requires
monitoring and maintaining LSRV above 60,000 cps by
adding either dry or liquid bio-polymer as needed.
Solids-control equipment should have a linear-motion

shale shaker with a minimum 210 mesh; 250 mesh is
preferred when available. The centrifuge is a high-speed
unit that can process approximately half of the flow
stream while drilling. To take advantage of every
opportunity to remove solids, the centrifuge should be run
while tripping as well as while drilling.

4.5 WINDOW MILLING OPERATIONS
The method for milling the window is determined based

on the wellbore configuration and any downhole problems
(e.g., corroded casing). A casing caliper should be run to
determine the condition of the casing. If no problems are
encountered and the wellbore is competent, the preferred
method is via a mechanical whipstock. Ditch magnets are
required for the window milling operation and should be
used for several circulations after drilling has been started
to remove metal shavings that will interfere with MWD
tools.
One of two window-milling methods is typically used to

mill a smooth exit window in the existing well. The two
methods discussed below are:
1. From a cement plug in the casing
2. From a mechanical whipstock set in the

casing
Figure 28. CT Window Mills

(Hupp et al., 2001)
4.5.1 Cement Whipstock
After it is determined that a cement whipstock is required,

the desired kick-off point (KOP) is confirmed with the CTD
engineer and directional driller. The recommended slurry
for a cement whipstock is 17 ppg Class G neat cement.
As a rule of thumb, a firm cement top needs to be a
minimum of 30 ft above the expected top of the window.
Compare this depth to any known restrictions (if through-

tubing then check depth of tubing tail) and the BHA

length. This 30 ft of firm cement allows the entire motor
assembly to be buried in the low-side pilot hole before
turning the tool face to the high side to drill the ramp.
An example method for milling a window off of cement

follows:
1. After setting the cement plug in place, the

cement should be allowed to reach a
compressive strength of 3000-4000 psi before
milling the low-side pilot hole. Mill low-side
(TF = 180°) pilot hole with viscosified field
seawater to approximately 10 ft above the
planned window depth. The BHA for milling
the pilot hole should consist of the following:
diamond speed mill

mud motor with 1° bent housing
MWD with gamma ray
Orienter
circulation sub and hydraulic disconnect
cross-over
two joints tubing
CT connector
2. Approximately 2000-lb WOB should be used
while milling the pilot hole. After the pilot hole
is milled, pull up above the top of cement and
orient to high side. Run BHA back into pilot
hole and mill high side pilot/ramp until casing
contact is indicated by a significant counter-
clockwise roll-off in TF. The CT should be
flagged at this point prior to pulling out of the
hole to pick up the window milling assembly
which consists of the following:
window mill (Figure 28)

mud motor with 3° bent housing and a 1.5°
sub on top
MWD with gamma ray

orienter
circulation sub and hydraulic disconnect
cross-over
two joints tubing
CT connector
3. Run in hole, tie in with gamma ray and stop
BHA 10 ft off bottom in preparation for time
drilling sequence. The time drilling sequence
will start the window, but the remainder of the
window will be drilled by gradually increasing
the WOB with penetration rates ranging from
0.5-2 ft/hr. Once the mill has drilled off of the
casing and into the formation, there should be
a significant increase in rate of penetration.
Drill 5 ft of formation, flag the CT and pull out
of hole for window-dressing operation. The
BHA for this operation includes a 3° motor,
string reamer, and pilot mill.
4.5.2 Mechanical Whipstock
After the caliper log has been run, the KOP is confirmed
with the CTD engineer and the directional driller. The
mechanical whipstock is run and set at the predetermined
depth on e-line if the wellbore is vertical and on CT if well
inclination is greater than 65°. This depth is selected to
coincide with the KOP as well as to avoid casing collars,
corroded casing and troublesome shale intervals. The

same milling fluids are used for this operation as are used
in the cement whipstock operation.
A typical example of window milling off of a mechanical

whipstock follows:
1. The BHA for starting the window consists of :
carbide dimple mill

mud motor
circulation sub
hydraulic disconnect
two joints of drill collars or tubing
CT connector
2. This BHA is run in the well to the top of the
whipstock. It will then move 3 ft down the
whipstock and contact the casing. Here the
window milling process begins. Due to the
aggressive nature of the carbide mill, getting
the window started is the most critical stage.
A minimum of 6-8 ft should be milled with the
first mill. After milling +8 ft, the mill is typically
in the formation and the ability to drill will stop
because this mill is not designed to drill
formation. It is recommended to run this first
mill until it stops drilling and with WOB limited
to 2500 lb. This BHA is pulled out of the hole
and a second BHA is run consisting of:
formation mill
carbide string reamer
mud motor
circulation sub
two joints of drill collars or tubing
CT connector
3. This second assembly is used to enlarge and
dress off the window such that subsequent
drilling BHAs can pass through the window.
The formation mill should allow the formation
to be drilled faster, and its undergauge design
should minimize the wear in the window.
Because of the aggressive design of the
formation mill, it will tend to grab the casing at
the window and cause motor stalling. This
mill and reamer are not designed to lengthen
the window, and therefore it is important to
mill a sufficient length with the initial BHA.
Drill enough formation to move the string
reamer past the window. Then ream across
the window at least three times to ensure the
window is clean. Shut down the pump and
make a pass up and down through the
window without the motor turning. Pull out of
the hole with this BHA and prepare to pick up
the drilling assembly.
A technique has been developed more recently to mill a

window off of a mechanical whipstock in one trip. The
whipstock is set in place as before and the following
assembly is run:
• modified one-trip window mill (see Figure 28)
• smooth OD string mill (see Figure 28)
• high speed mud motor (7:8 lobe) RPM range:

150-250
• two joints of tubing
• circulation sub

• hydraulic disconnect
• CT connector
The window is milled in the same process as the first

BHA. The need for the second BHA is eliminated, along
with a reduction in window milling time.
4.6 PRODUCTION LINER: RUNNING AND

CEMENTING
Overview
One of the more crucial operations for the CTD

Supervisor, following the drilling of the hole, is the running
of the completion liner and cementing the liner if
necessary. This operation requires some upfront
planning and management of the tubular inventory. The
points discussed in this section for running and/or
cementing a liner are:
1. Type of liner to be run – blank or pre-

perforated/slotted
2. Cement parameters
Even though the liner top depth can be determined before

drilling begins, the depth at which the liner will be set can
only be determined once the well has reached TD. This
means that planning and management of the tubing must
take into consideration the desired footage to be drilled
plus a 10-15% additional amount in case additional hole
is required. The liner material should also be tallied,
drifted and inspected prior to coming on location. Once
received, the liner should be re-tallied and drifted to
ensure it is correct. The Supervisor should specify the
amount of liner to be run and the joints numbered for
running in the well. All of the correct handling tools
should be ordered out with the tubing and checks made of
all of the make-up equipment to confirm that the
equipment has been properly maintained and calibrated.
Due to the slim holes that are typically drilled in CTD, a
flush-joint-type connection is required to provide annular
space for cementing and prevent cement build-
up/dehydration at the connections. These types of
connections are not usually designed for high bending
stresses and heavy loads. Therefore, a confirmation with
the CTD engineer as to the size, weight, grade, and
tubing thread to be used is recommended. Some of the
other important points to check prior to running the liner
are:
• Ensure that the TIW stabbing valve is tested,

labeled, and ready in the open position for the
liner size / thread being run. If pre-perforated
or slotted liner, a joint of blank tubing should
be made up to the TIW valve.
• Ensure that the wellbore fluid level is

monitored and the hole kept full at all times.
• Confirm liner sized slip rams are in place in

the BOP stack (needed to pull test the
liner/running tool).
• The liner lifting nubbins should be tightened

with a 24-in. pipe wrench and a back-up.
• Use "YT” type elevators.
• Use the proper size bowl, slips, and safety

clamp for the liner.
• Strap and drift all pipe. Install turbolizers as

described in the procedure.
• Determine size and type of deployment sleeve

based on tubing size and need for a liner top

packer. The standard deployment sleeve for

2⅞-in. liners is 3.75-in. OD, 3.00-in. ID, 4 ft
long and has a 3.13 in. GS profile on top.
Modifications to this may include a larger entry
guide on top for different sizes of tubing or
increased length for seal movement in long
straddle applications.
• Ensure that a short trip to the window has

been made as well as a tie-in run with the GR
and run back in to confirm TD prior to pulling
out with the drilling BHA.
• Pig the CT with the CT wiper plug to be

pumped behind the cement. Check the
accuracy of micromotion meters, if used, in
and out against known reel volume and
against counter on triplex pump. Note any
damage to the dart when retrieved.
• Hold on-site safety meeting to review issues

related to running the liner.
4.6.1 Liner Running: Blank Liner
The CTD Supervisor will inspect and confirm the integrity

of the liner and all associated equipment. Following is an
example for safely running the blank liner and placing it at
the desired depth prior to cementing:
1. Ensure that the CT liner running tool (CTLRT)

is set to release at the desired pressure.
Check the releasing ball size and the ball seat
shear value. The liner should be pinned to
release from the CTLRT at about 1000 psi
above the ball seat value and should shear
after the CT dart latches up.
2. Liner should be made up in the following

order:
dual float shoe with tapered nose

one joint of liner
float collar
one joint liner
landing collar
liner
liner deployment sub
CTLRT with liner wiper plug and shearable
ball seat with catcher sub
swivel
cross-over
CT connector
3. Because this liner has a flush-joint connection
thereby causing difficulty in identifying collar
locations for tie-in, at least one 10-ft pup joint
with integrated turbolizers above and below
should be installed in the liner for future collar
location tie-in.
4. Turbolizers are recommended to be installed

on the liner with the number and placement
dependent on hole conditions.
Recommended placement is one integral
turbolizer per joint in the open hole (one
integral turbolizer or one slip-on turbolizer per
joint above the window).
5. All connections should be torqued to the

thread manufacturing company’s
recommendation.
6. Fill the liner while running it.

7. Close the BOP slip rams on the liner and pull

test the CTLRT to 30,000 lbs.
8. Recommended run-in-hole speed is 100 ft/min

while circulating at minimum rate. Speed
should be reduced to 50 ft/min when running
through the window and in the open hole.
9. Run in hole (RIH) and pull out of hole (POOH)

weights should be recorded above the
window. RIH to TD and confirm full
circulation. If hole conditions allow, slowly
reciprocate liner in 15-20 ft strokes for 3-4
cycles while pumping at a maximum pressure
of 2200 psi. Pressure is limited to minimize
risk of premature disconnect at CTLRT.
10. Set liner on bottom and displace well while

monitoring well pressure and returns.
11. Pump a ball to the CTLRT ball seat. You

must maintain liner running tool in
compression (+/-10 klb down at tool) for tool
to release liner. Pressure up to release the
CTLRT and shear out the ball. pick up to
confirm release, but try to avoid pulling seals
out of the polished bore. Slack-off and stack
10 klb on liner. Resume circulation at
maximum rate until cement is ready to pump.
4.6.2 Liner Cementing
To ensure a competent cement job, the CTD Supervisor

should calculate the volumes of cement and spacers
required. Cement parameters should be verified as well
as a check of and confirmation of lab testing performed
on the cement to be pumped. The cementing company
should be notified at least 12 hours prior to running the
liner to secure their timely arrival on location. A safety
meeting should be held to brief all involved parties and
warn everyone of the areas where high-pressure lines will
be run. Verification of the volumes and pressures to be
pumped should be discussed and resolved between the
CTD Supervisor and the cementing engineer. The
following parameters are recommended for cementing the
liner in place: (Note: shear and setting pressures should
be determined on a well-by-well basis. The fluid type in
the wellbore is critical to establish these.)
1. The desired volume of pumpable cement

should be calculated based on open-hole
volume plus 40% excess, shoe joint(s)
volume, and liner by production liner/casing
annulus volume. This volume should bring
the top of the cement to a minimum of 20 ft
above the window. The cement should be
mixed to the same parameters as the lab test
performed for the cement design in the
planning stage.
2. Cement should be pumped by staging off the

cementing company’s meter, and measuring
out of a calibrated displacement tank. After
the desired cement volume is pumped, shut
down pumping, load dart in launcher on CT
reel and launch dart. Pump 1-2 bbl of field
water displacement and shut down. Close
reel valve and check to confirm that CT wiper
dart left the launching chamber. It is
recommended to flush cement from dead
space between the reel valve and the filter by-
pass. Continue displacing cement at
maximum rate.
3. Displacement should be slowed to 1 BPM, 2

bbl prior to picking up liner wiper plug to
improve chance of seeing the latch up. After
latch up, the liner wiper plug should shear at
the predetermined value (+15%). If latch up is
not seen, stop displacement at 2 bbl less than
calculated bbl to bump.

4. Shear liner wiper plug and continue

displacement at maximum rate possible. Slow
pumps to 0.5 BPM about 1 bbl before planned
plug bump. If plug does not bump, do not
over-displace more than liner volume below
landing collar. Liner wiper plug will latch into
the landing collar and provide two-way check.
Bleed off pressure to check floats.
Repressure to 500 psi and sting out of the
polished bore.
5. Prior to POOH, circulation at the liner top

should be done to clear any excess cement.
6. A nozzle and CNL logging run is

recommended to be run following the cement
job (a work string with enough tubing to keep
the CT connector above the liner top may be
required). The liner should not be entered
until there is an indication of at least 200 psi
compressive strength on the cement. This run
will serve to clean out any remaining cement
as well as provide a tie-in log for perforating
and verify the depth location of the liner top.
If there are any indications of cement or
uncertainty over depth of latch collar, pick
up a motor and parabolic diamond speed
mill to mill inside of liner. Make sure BHA
is made up with a shear disk in the
circulation sub below the work string.
There should not be a circulation sub with
the upper disconnect, above the work
string.
7. Spot a filtered 2% KCl with 120k-150k LSRV

per pill in the liner after the CNL trip.
8. After POOH with CNL log, check to ensure

that the cement has at least 2000 psi
compressive strength from the UCA test.
(The Ultrasonic Cement Analyzer is a lab tool
that measures ultrasonic velocity of the
cement under simulated wellbore conditions.
This directly measures the compressibility of
the sample.) Then the liner/lap should be
tested to 2200 psi for 30 min and any leak
reported.
4.6.3 Liner Running: Pre-Perforated or Slotted

Liner
The CTD Supervisor will inspect and confirm the integrity

of the liner and all associated equipment. Following is
an example for safely running a pre-perforated/slotted
liner and placing it at the desired depth prior to
cementing:
1. Ensure that the CT Liner Running tool

(CTLRT) is set to release at the desired
pressure. Check the releasing ball size and
the ball seat shear value.
2. The liner should be made up in the following

order:
guide shoe with tapered nose

one joint of liner
“O-ring” sub
pre-perforated/slotted liner
liner deployment sub
internal work string stung into “O” ring sub
CTLRT with shearable ball seat and cage
swivel
cross-over

CT connector
3. Turbolizers are recommended to be installed
on the liner with the number and placement
dependent on hole conditions.
Recommended placement is one integral
turbolizer per joint in the open hole; one
integral turbolizer or one slip-on turbolizer per
joint above the window.
4. All connections should be torqued to the

thread manufacturing company’s
recommendation.
5. Close the BOP slip rams on the liner and pull

test the CTLRT to 30,000 lb.
6. Recommended RIH speed is 100 ft/min while

circulating at minimum rate. Speed should be
reduced to 50 ft/min when running through the
window and in the open hole.
7. RIH and POOH weights should be recorded

above the window. RIH to TD and confirm full
circulation.
8. Pump a ball to the CTLRT ball seat. You

must maintain liner running tool in
compression (±10 klb down at tool) for tool to
release liner. Pressure up to release the
CTLRT and shear out the ball. Pick up to
confirm release.
4.7 LOGGING/PERFORATING
Because all rig personnel will be involved in the make up

and handling of the logging and perforating tools, a safety
meeting should be conducted prior to any logging or
perforating operation, as well as during the operation as
personnel or objectives change. The majority of the tools
to be run will be perforating guns and incorporate
explosives, so most of the items for the safety meetings
will center around running and pulling perforating guns.
Some of these items are:
1. Identify all people on site, introduce the

Logging/Perforating Specialist, and discuss
pick up, make up, and break out procedures.
2. Rough handling of logging tools/guns could

result in poor performance of the system. The
guns are fired using percussion detonators,
not electrical detonators. Hence, radio silence
is not needed. No welding or open flame is
allowed near the guns.
3. Keep non-essential personnel away while

assembling guns. Establish personnel
assignments.
4. Logging tool/gun will be assembled with the

rig crew and with the Logging/Perforating
Specialist's assistance and supervision.
Exercise caution when removing thread
protectors and installing lifting subs. Trapped
pressure precautions will be used when
breaking out guns. Use appropriate handling
equipment: dog collar, slips, and elevators.
The Logging/Perforating Specialist will provide
lifting subs.
5. Gauge H2S risk from the well and from the

guns. Determine spill prevention needs.
6. Consider well-control issues. Establish safe

pump pressures and rates.
7. Identify all hazards going in the hole. Liner

tops, tight spots, windows, doglegs, plug back
total depth, etc. Determine connection from
firing head to BHA and the correct ball size
and type to be used. Note the disconnect ball
size.

The CTD Supervisor should contact the perforating

service company with an estimate of interval, gun and
charge type as soon as drilling is begun. Once the well is
at total depth, determine final perforation depths, and give
the service company latitude for meeting these chosen
intervals plus or minus a few feet. The following
recommendations should be incorporated to ensure a
safe and effective operation:
• The service company will provide a detailed

tool-string diagram. All equipment will be
strapped and calipered.
• Drifting the work string is recommended to

ensure passage of the ball used to fire the
guns.
• Clean fluids are essential. Cement debris can

be very detrimental and could cause failure of
the ball to seat and possibly not fire. A chunk
of cement can actually seat and fire the guns
in some instances.
Following is a recommended BHA for perforating.

Logging tools run are typically memory type tools and will
not require any downhole mechanism (i.e., firing head) to
enable the tool:
Bullnose, tapered, with water courses (for

liner entry)
Perforation guns, loaded and blank

Safety spacer (to keep live guns below
floor when installing firing head)
Firing head
Hydraulic disconnect
Work string (if needed)
Hydraulic disconnect
Check valve
Non-rotating joint
CTC
The CTD Supervisor and CT Driller should ensure the
following recommendations are followed during the
logging/perforating operation:
• Compare the gun layout to original selected

intervals and to the guns themselves.
Commence picking up guns. Use correct dog
collar, slips, elevators, and lift subs. Make up
the firing head.
• Make up the disconnect. Drop the firing head

ball through the disconnect before making it
up to ensure ball passes and will not operate
the disconnect.
• Run the work string. All starts and stops with

the pipe should be smooth; do not set slips
while moving.
• The ability to pump at any time is normally

available, but the Logging/Perforating
Specialist must be present, and rate/pressure
limits must be discussed. Trip in the hole at
normal speeds; if weight loss is encountered
try to keep it less than 5000 lb.
• Tie in to up-hole flag on CT. Slow down to 30-

50 ft/min when approaching bottom. Tagging
bottom is normal for depth control when
perforating. Logging tools are more fragile
and tagging bottom with them should be done
only if necessary. Pick up and correct depth.
PUH to shooting depth.

• Drop ball (may have to move the coil to

position ball launcher for ball drop). Once ball
is loaded, pressure up to 500 psi minimum
and open reel valve to launch ball. Bring
pumps on line, 1.5 BPM for ½-in. ball or 2.5
BPM max for ⅝-in. ball, maximum rate. Keep
the pumps rolling and PUH to shooting depth.
At 8-10 bbl from the calculated volume,
decrease rate to 0.5 BPM until pressure build-
up and drop-off is noted. Firing head
generally will be set to fire at 3000 psi
differential. Fluid loss should be monitored
and documented after firing.
• Monitoring the well volume while POOH is

very important. Maximum safe pull weight
should be determined prior to running in the
hole.
• Caution must be exercised when starting to

break out the BHA, as trapped pressure can
be encountered. Procedures should be
incorporated for this as necessary; typically, a
mud box is used and the relief hole bled off.
Continue breaking out guns and monitor well
fluid level at appropriate times. Inspect guns
for misfires and misaligned shots.
• Rams should never be closed on live guns or

on logging tools. Fishable lift subs should be
used when possible in case the guns need to
be dropped.
4.8 OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS
There are several operational problems for which

contingency plans need to be in place prior to starting the
CTD operation. The CTD engineer, CTD Supervisor and
CT Driller should meet and determine what contingency
planning is necessary for a particular well and the
proposed drilling operation. The primary or typical
problems are discussed in this section.
4.8.1 Lost Circulation
Drilling fluid losses that result from the wellbore

intersecting conductive faults, fault related fractures,
underpressured sands or high permeability thief zones
are the most common and costly for CTD operations.
Every lost circulation situation is unique, and the strategy
to control, slow, or eliminate the losses is dependent on
many factors such as severity and ultimate well
objectives. The decision can range from "do nothing" to
"cement plugback and sidetrack." Losses range from
minimal (<¼ BPM), which heal in time from drill solids, to
massive (no returns at full pump rate). While continued
drilling is possible with severe losses, attempts should be
made to slow the losses if they are in excess of about ½
BPM. Drilling without returns means that the cuttings are
being lost to the formation/loss zone. These types of
losses make hole cleaning difficult, increase the risk for
stuck pipe and could compromise the liner cement quality.
There are numerous types of lost circulation materials

(LCM) that can be pumped. The success of a specific
recipe at a particular severity is difficult to determine. It
should be remembered that most LCM pills cannot be
pumped through the drilling BHA because of MWD
plugging. A trip is usually required to install a nozzle.
Drilling fluid needs should be planned accordingly for this
trip time. In determining the LCM to use, the following
should be considered:
• LCM pills that bridge at the face of the loss

zone are good for only a short time. Usually,
losses return to the same level when drilling is
resumed and the LCM is washed or

mechanically removed from the formation

face.
• LCM pills that are designed to penetrate the

loss zone and then build a low compressive
strength are good for a longer length of time.
These pills require a certain amount of
thickening time at a given temperature to
become "immobile," so it is usually critical to
include a bridging additive in the tail to keep
the well from drinking while the slurry is
setting up. The ultimate compressive strength
target should be about 300-400 psi to prevent
an inadvertent sidetrack when the LCM is
drilled out.
• If a plugback/sidetrack is planned, it is still

desired to slow or stop high losses before
laying in the cement kick-off plug because it is
critical to have control of the depth of the top
of cement. For these situations, an LCM that
bridges at the formation face is usually
sufficient.
• For losses at total depth, an open-hole

inflatable bridge plug (IBP) may be
considered.
• In extreme cases where losses are very high

and the conventional LCM recipes mentioned
above have failed, a diesel/bentonite "gunk"
pill may be considered.
• Treating losses as they occur should result in

minimizing both cost and risk. It is difficult to
stop or slow losses when there are multiple
thief zones in the wellbore because there is
less control over LCM placement/squeezing,
and contamination is more likely. Generally,
when losses are observed, attempt to drill
another 30 to 50 feet to get past the lost-
circulation zone. However, continued drilling
beyond that point, especially for high losses,
may reduce the chance of successfully
treating that particular loss zone and increase
the chance of becoming stuck.
Some guidelines to follow if lost circulation is encountered

while drilling are:
• Stop drilling, pick-up off bottom, keep pipe

moving, and establish severity of loss at full
pump rate via pits and flow meters. If the
open hole becomes sticky or pipe movement
is a problem, pull the BHA above the window.
• If conditions allow, drill another 30 to 50 feet in

an attempt to get past the lost circulation
zone. Assess losses again.
• For low losses (<¼ BPM), continue drilling

and monitor any change in loss rate. The
losses may slow or stop as drill solids provide
bridging. With reduced return rates, hole
cleaning is a big concern and an increased
frequency of wiper trips to the window should
be considered.
• If it is decided to pump an LCM pill, then flag

the CT and POOH with the drilling BHA to
install a nozzle. To minimize losses, POOH
without pumping down the coil and fill the well
through the kill line and into the annulus.
Make up the following BHA:
CT connector
non-rotating joint
check valves
two joints of tubing
bullnose nozzle

• RIH to flag, correct depth, and continue to TD.

Pump LCM following manufacturing
company’s procedure, if reasonable. In
general, lay the pill in from TD (about 1.0
BPM; 70 ft/min), pull to safety (>100 ft above
calculated top of pill), and then circulate at
minimum rate while monitoring returns.
Additional back pressure (squeeze) is not
recommended at any time during the
operation.
• Determine if another pill is needed. Typically,

if any losses are apparent, another pill will be
required. With the small volumes of pills
normally used, it doesn't take long for the well
to "drink" the entire LCM even with minor
losses.
• If the losses have stopped, POOH while filling

the hole. Make up the drilling assembly. RIH
and wash through the open hole slowly and
monitor returns continuously. If any motor
work is seen, ensure that the tool face is
positioned where the hole was drilled to avoid
an inadvertent sidetrack. Wash/ream to TD
and proceed with drilling new hole if losses
have returned to an acceptable level or
stopped.
4.8.2 Stuck Pipe
Conditions that can lead to stuck pipe are differential

sticking, hole instability (shales/clay), ledges, mechanical
sticking, and key seating. Differential sticking is by far the
most common form of sticking and usually occurs while
drilling when the BHA comes in contact with a newly
exposed section of the reservoir still taking mud filtrate.
This often occurs during "stacking" conditions when the
BHA stops moving because of insufficient weight transfer.
Sticking due to hole instability can be observed in shale-
like sections of the reservoir. Extruding clays or swelling
shales are seen particularly during tripping and tend to
get worse with time. Reaming these problem areas
thoroughly on each BHA trip or wiper trip is usually a
sufficient remedy.
Sloughing shales in the reservoir section are rare but are

extremely difficult to contend with, and conditions usually
do not improve by increasing mud weight. Ledges rarely
cause sticking but can be encountered both while RIH
and POOH. Shale/sand interfaces in the build section are
where ledges are most commonly found. The danger
with ledges is that a well can be sidetracked inadvertently
if a ledge is tagged while RIH at full pump rate.
Mechanical sticking occurs when a piece of debris (rock,
junk, etc) wedges beside the BHA. Key seating (where
the pipe wears a groove in the formation that will not allow
the BHA to pass through) normally is not a problem in
CTD; however, it should be considered in the rare cases
when long-term pumping could cause vibration of the coil
across an area of high dog-leg severity, especially in an
area where hole inclination is lost. Recommendations for
these conditions are as follows:
• A good rule to follow for sticky hole conditions

is to always keep the pipe moving, but be
aware of the effect on the life of the CT. Also,
with the exception of ledges seen while RIH,
always maintain full pump rate when tripping
pipe in open hole.
• For differential sticking:
Continue circulating at full pump rate to

clean up cuttings. Note any packing off.
If nitrogen is available, develop an

underbalanced condition to free the string.

This approach does not contaminate mud,

and also avoids working the CT.
With overbalanced fluids, work stuck pipe

in 20,000-lb increments to maximum pull
(usually 80% of CT yield strength)
Reduce pump to minimum rate (to lower

ECD's). Work stuck pipe. Consider CT
pipe fatigue management when working
pipe in one spot for an extended time.
Spot crude oil (if available) per procedure

below.
Once tools pull free, perform a wiper trip to

the window before resuming drilling.
• If sticky shales are observed, ream the

problem area in and out until clean. Reaming
should be done with the same tool face used
to drill this section of the wellbore. While RIH,
sticky conditions may occur with or without
motor work. (“Motor work” refers to the
differential between pressure indicated on the
CT pressure gauge with the bit off bottom and
that with the bit on bottom drilling. When the
bit is on bottom drilling, the pressure at the
surface increases, giving an indication that the
motor is turning/rotating the bit. Any time this
differential pressure is observed it indicates
that the motor and bit are turning.) If motor
work is indicated, it is important to keep the
pipe moving and prevent sidetracking. It may
be necessary to minimize pump rate and push
the bit through a small portion of the problem
area, and then backream slowly at full pump
rate. If no motor work is observed (i.e., no
increase in pump pressure), but a weight
reduction is observed (common for long, stiff
BHAs), maintain full pump rate.
• Ledges (particularly those found while RIH)

should be treated with caution to prevent
sidetracking the well. If the tools take any
weight, immediately pick up and check tool
face. It may be necessary to reduce pump
rate and attempt to "bounce" the BHA over the
ledge. If unsuccessful, run a hole opener or
bi-centered bit, which allows more aggressive
motor work and reduces the risk of
sidetracking. After the BHA moves past the
ledge, backream the area thoroughly to
ensure clean passage of the tools.
Figure 29. Weight Indicator
• Mechanical sticking can occur anywhere in

the wellbore and can involve any portion of
the BHA. It usually occurs while POOH when
debris or sand-duning meets the BHA. It's not
uncommon to be able to visualize (via the
weight indicator (Figure 29)) the debris rolling
along the BHA until it catches an upset or the
bit. If the bit becomes stuck, it is readily
apparent from the motor work (pump

pressure). For mechanical sticking, follow

these guidelines:
Maintain maximum pump rate to keep

debris above the BHA, and keep the pipe
moving.
If continued upward movement stops at

about 20,000-30,000 lb overpull (this is
dependent on CT size), stop working pipe
up and start attempting to get downward
movement. The key is to maintain high
pump rate and keep the tools moving, even
if moving in the downward direction.
If movement stops in both directions,

attempt to orient to work the debris in a
different manner. Continue working pipe,
primarily in the downward direction.
If tools are still stuck, spot crude oil or other

hole “slicking” or lubricating fluids. It's
unlikely that crude oil will solve these
sticking problems, but it should be
attempted before disconnecting. In
carbonate formations, pump acid to
dissolve rock cuttings.
Drop ball, disconnect, and proceed with

fishing operations.
For underbalanced conditions with two-

phase fluids, use water hammer technique.
Crude Oil Spotting Procedure
Once it has been decided to pump crude (or other

lubricating fluid), proceed as follows:
1. Call for approximately 20 bbl of dead crude

for pumping two separate 10-bbl jobs.
2. If field crude is being used, do not pump any

crude unless the Reid vapor pressure at
100°F is less than 1.5 psi. Obtain a sample
from the truck and perform a vapor test per
rig contractor's procedure. Otherwise,
commercially available crude oil should be
used, which will alleviate vapor problems.
3. Rig up the vacuum truck discharge hose to

the inlet side of the centrifugal pump feeding
the rig pump. Ground all equipment. Use
only hammer unions (Cam-locks). Ensure
the driver stands by the truck throughout the
operation.
4. Hold safety and operational procedure

meeting. Discuss risks and hazard
mitigation, including well control (pumping
lower density fluid).
5. Pump 10 bbl of crude oil, zeroing the

totalizer when density drops. Displace with
drilling fluid.
6. When approximately 2 bbl of crude are out

of the bit, shut down the pumps, and let
crude soak for about 5 minutes with pipe at
neutral weight.
7. Work the stuck pipe without pumping. If

unable to pull free, pump a few more bbl of
crude around to the backside. Soak. Work
pipe.
8. Once the BHA is free, pick up 20 to 30 ft,

continue moving pipe and circulate the crude
to surface. Divert the strung-out crude to the
cuttings tank or divert tank. Expect 50 to 100
bbl of contaminated drilling fluid to be lost
(discarded).
9. Have the vacuum truck operator suck back

his hose until dry.

10. Perform a wiper trip to the window and

back. Resume drilling.
4.8.3 Open-Hole Sidetracks
Sidetracks out of an open hole are common in CTD

operations. Reasons for drilling sidetracks include
geologic target changes, unexpected faults, inability to
control hole direction and hole conditions. There are
three methods generally used for sidetracking out of the
drilled hole: 1) off a cement plug; (2) off a mechanical
plug; and 3) open hole. Sidetracking off a cement plug is
relatively fast and eliminates potential future problems
(both drilling and production) caused by leaving the
original hole open without any isolation from the
sidetracked hole. In cases where isolation is not a
concern, sidetracking from the open hole using time
drilling is the most common approach.
4.8.3.1 Sidetrack from a Cement Plug
This operation involves a little more planning than the

open-hole sidetrack, but the results are generally better
and future operations are less hindered. Following are
recommendations for performing a sidetrack of the open
hole off a cement plug:
1. A neat cement slurry with the following

parameters should be used:
Density: 16-17 ppg

Fluid loss: 70-90 cc
Thickening time: 2 to 3 hours (based on
hole conditions) plus one hour surface time
The cement design should be based on 1

hr at surface plus any warming back from
BHCT (assume about 30°F below BHST if
not measured by MWD) to BHST over 4
hours.
Volume: at least enough to cover 200 ft

above the desired kickoff point. Volumes
will be small; for example, 1.37 bbl is
required to fill 100 ft of 3.75-in. hole.
2. Select a location in a fairly continuous sand if

possible. This allows a quick direction change
from the original wellbore.
3. The cement should be placed from 10-20 ft

above TD to 200-400 ft above desired kick-off
depth. It should then be contaminated to 30-
40 ft above the desired kick-off depth. This
allows for losses to the formation while the
cement is setting up as well as errors in depth
control.
4. RIH with a dart catcher/cementing stinger and

cement nozzle BHA. Tag bottom and correct
depth. Plan to lay in cement starting 10-20 ft
off bottom. This allows moving the CT "in
hole" in case a "temporary immobile"
condition arises. Circulate and condition mud
while mixing cement. Note CT pressure at 0.5
and 1.0 BPM.
5. No fresh-water spacers should be pumped

ahead of the cement other than 1-2 bbl
pressure test water. This is to prevent any
swelling clays from sticking the BHA. Also, no
fresh-water spacer is needed behind the
cement. The cement should be pumped to
the manifold bypass sample port and a barrel
count started at a cement weight of 14.5 ppg
or greater. This will account for any cement
dilution while pumping. Then the desired
volume should be measured while pumping
from a displacement tank. After pumping the

desired volume, the reel should be shut in and

the surface lines flushed of cement.
6. Set the rig stroke counter (or fluid meter) to

zero. Load wiper dart. Launch the dart with
up to 2 bbl of mud. Check to confirm that the
dart is gone.
7. Displace with mud at 2.5 to 3.0 BPM and slow

to 0.7 to 1.0 BPM when cement exits the
nozzle. Cement will be U-tubing at this point.
Don't be surprised to see the CT pressure fall
to less than 500 psi as the rate is slowed. It is
not necessary to apply any backpressure with
the choke. Cement volume and annular
space are so small that equilibrium is quickly
reached. The density difference between the
cement and mud will leave a small
contaminated area which will be at the top of
the plug at the end of the job. It's more
important to lay a good plug in the next step.
8. After 1-2 bbl of cement is out of the nozzle,

begin POOH. Generally, string weight is too
large for the injector motor to be set in high
gear, so pulling speed will be about 70 ft/min
in low gear. Higher pulling speed and faster
rate are preferred if possible. Therefore, the
speed/rate combination most likely will be 73
ft/min at 1.0 BPM. CT pressure will gradually
increase as the plug becomes balanced.
9. Adjust POOH speed/rate (drop to 0.5 BPM

with about half the cement gone if speed
cannot be increased) so that the nozzle will be
from 100 ft below to near the calculated
cement top when the dart hits. It's important
to not outrun the cement since a contaminated
plug will be the result. Washed out hole and
initial water spurt loss from the cement will
make the calculated top of cement deeper
than anticipated.
10. Stop pumping if the dart hits early and pull to

the calculated cement top (slowly to prevent
swabbing and contamination).
11. Shear the dart at the calculated cement top.

Then pull up the hole another 200 ft or to
safety (cased hole) while pumping enough
fluid to keep the hole full (0.5-1.0 BPM).
12. Circulate at a low rate (0.5-1.0 BPM) to

minimize ECD while waiting 30 minutes for the
cement to settle and develop some gel
strength. Compare to the initial rate/pressure.
Note: It is not necessary to apply any
"squeeze" pressure. It is actually detrimental
to apply pressure since the formation could
break down or a dehydrated area could form
leaving a bridge that cannot be jetted and a
cement top higher than planned.
13. RIH to calculated cement top and then begin

circulating at 2.5 BPM while RIH at 30-40
ft/min and contaminate the cement to 30-40 ft
above the desired kick-off depth. Zero the
returns meter and chase the contaminated
cement to surface while POOH (don't outrun
it). Plan ahead for disposal of the
contaminated cement (usually 40-70 bbl).
Clean out tanks as soon as possible.
14. Plan ahead for replacing any lost volume

and be certain there is enough mud in the pits
after dumping the contaminated cement to still
pump while POOH.
15. RIH with sidetracking BHA. The bit should

be an aggressive PDC with a fairly flat bottom.
The motor bend should be based on the
requirements of getting back to the new
target, but a 1.5° bend motor or larger is
preferred.

16. WOC until cement has developed 3000-psi

compressive strength. This is about two times
the thickening time. Believe the lab test! The
cement downhole will be hard, and waiting
more than 3 times the thickening time is a
waste of time.
17. Get on depth using a GR tie-in or a previous

flag. Be sure that the back cutters are not
damaged in the window if a tie-in is at the RA
marker on the whipstock.
18. As a precaution, ream from the window to

TOC preferably with a tool face similar to the
original hole. This is important if the hole was
drilled with a smaller bend motor.
19. Orient to set the correct tool face for the

kick-off of the new hole. Perform a 5-10 ft/min
pass from TOC to 40 ft above the TOC to be
certain the tool face will hold for the entire
length. Make any final adjustments and
repeat the scribe. This is very important and
must be correct before continuing.
20. RIH and tag the TOC. Flag the CT in the

down mode. Pull up hole slowly and note the
hanging weight and then the stretch length
(usually 5-8 ft). Pull the CT up hole by the
stretch length. Since depth measurements
are taken in the down mode, this is the depth
of the TOC in the up mode.
21. Begin drilling using the weight/rate

parameters that the directional driller specifies
to maintain the correct tool face.
22. At this point, the directional driller usually

needs to orient to get back to a tool face
similar to the old hole. This is difficult to
accomplish in one orienting session if a 2.0º
or larger motor is used because the bit will be
in a bind due to a radical directional change.
Also, future BHAs that would follow this
radical change tend to pull tight and/or tear up
the formation. Therefore, it is prudent to
perform the complete tool face change in
stages of about 60º per 5 ft, which results in a
smooth turn.
4.8.3.2 Sidetrack from a Mechanical Plug
This operation is not as tedious as the cement plug, but in

many ways requires more preparation of the hole. One of
the difficulties with sidetracking from a mechanical plug is
setting the plug and keeping it in place. Following are
recommendations for performing a sidetrack of the open
hole off a mechanical plug:
1. Select a location in a fairly continuous sand if

possible. This allows a quick direction change
from the original wellbore.
2. Prior to POOH with the drilling BHA, flag CT

and perform a slow backream over the interval
where the mechanical plug will be set to
remove any cuttings that might hinder setting
the plug.
3. RIH with mechanical plug, setting tool and

directional tools Tie in with GR above the
window. Continue in the hole slowly (about 30
ft/min) to the desired setting depth. Check
hanging weight approximately 200 ft above
setting depth.
4. Remove stretch from CT. Pull up hole slowly

and note the hanging weight and then the
stretch length (usually 5-8 ft). Pull the CT up
hole by the stretch length. Since depth
measurements are taken in the down mode,
this is the setting depth in the up mode. Drop
ball and circulate to the setting tool. Pressure
up to mechanical plug company

representative’s requested pressure and set

plug. Log off of plug with CT. RIH slowly and
tag top of plug. POOH.
5. RIH with sidetracking BHA. The bit should be

an aggressive PDC with a fairly flat bottom.
The motor bend should be based on the
requirements for getting back to the new
target, but a 1.5° bend motor or larger is
preferred.
6. Position the CT at depth using a GR tie-in or a

previous flag. Be sure that the back cutters
are not damaged in the window if a tie-in is at
the RA marker on the whipstock.
7. As a precaution, ream from the window to top

of plug preferably with a tool face similar to
the original hole. This is important if the hole
was drilled with a smaller bend motor.
8. Orient to get the correct tool face for the kick-

off of the new hole. Perform a 5-10 ft/min
pass from top of plug to 40 ft above it to be
sure the tool face will hold for the entire
length. Make any final adjustments and
repeat the scribe. This is very important and
must be correct before continuing.
9. RIH and tag the top of plug. Flag the CT in

the down mode. Pull up hole slowly and note
the hanging weight and then the stretch length
(usually 5-8 ft). Pull the CT up hole by the
stretch length. Since depth measurements
are taken in the down mode, this is the depth
of the TOC in the up mode.


needs to orient to return to a tool face that is
the formation. Therefore, it is prudent to
perform the complete TF change in stages of
about 60º per 5 ft which results in a smooth
turn.
4.8.3.3 Open Hole
This operation requires patience for successfully creating

a useable hole for drilling and completing. The main
objective for this type of sidetrack is to drill a new hole
that future drilling BHAs and the liner will follow without
entering the old hole. Some recommendations for
performing an open-hole sidetrack are:
1. Pick an area (from the MWD GR) that is

above any hole problem areas and that
sacrifices as little hole as possible. Choose a
point in a continuous sand where the wellbore
has a building trend and an azimuth change.
This will permit a quick direction change away
from the old hole, that will ideally be about
180° from the old hole and in the lower
quadrants. Gravity is your friend – take
advantage of it. Consideration should be
given to the least torturous route for reaching
the new target even if it requires sacrificing
more hole; the drilling ROP is generally high
and will be regained rapidly.
2. Once a tentative point has been identified,

confer with CTD engineer to be sure that the
target can be reached without excessive
dogleg severity or multiple motor bend
changes. It may appear easy to reach looking
at the directional map, but the numbers must

be calculated. This may require evaluating

several points to find one that meets the
requirements.
3. Depending on the formation, the bit should be

a fairly aggressive gauge protection and
include back cutters. The motor bend should
also be rather aggressive – recommend
bends of 2.0-2.75º. If possible, select a bend
that will drill the most hole with the least
number of tool-face changes after the
sidetrack has been completed. A locking-type
orienter is recommended over an adjustable
type.
4. RIH with the open-hole sidetrack BHA and get

on depth using a GR tie-in or a previous flag.
Be sure that the back cutters are not damaged
in the window if a tie-in is at the RA marker on
the whipstock.
5. As a precaution, ream from the window to

TOC preferably with a tool face similar to the
original hole. This is important if the hole was
drilled with a smaller bend motor.
6. Orient to obtain the correct tool face for the

kick-off of the new hole. Perform a 5-10
ft/minute pass (light scribe or trough in open
hole) from 20 ft below to 40 ft above the
planned kick-off point to be sure the tool face
will hold for the entire length. Make any final
adjustments and repeat the scribe. This is
very important and must be correct before
continuing.
7. RIH to the planned kick-off. Flag (F1) the CT

in the down mode. Pull up hole slowly and
note the hanging weight and then the stretch
length (usually 5-8 ft). Pull the CT past the
flag by the stretch length. Since depth
measurements are taken in the down mode,
this is the depth of the kick-off point in the up
mode. Flag the CT here also (F2). This is the
starting point of the first backream pass.

accomplish in one orienting session with a
2.0º or larger motor because the bit will be in
a bind due to a radical directional change.
the formation. Therefore it is prudent to
perform the complete tool-face change in
stages of about 60º per 5 ft which results in a
smooth turn.
9. Begin the initial scribe with the bit parked at

this depth for 10 minutes. Then begin a timed
15 ft backream at 0.5 ft/min.
10. At the top of the backream, RIH (slowly) the

stretch length and begin a timed down ream at
0.1 ft/3 min for 15 ft to the first flag on the reel
(F1 ).
11. Slowly pull the stretch out of the CT to the

second flag on the reel (F2). Begin the
second scribe up at 1.0 ft/min for 15 ft.
12. At the top of the backream, RIH (slowly) the

stretch length and begin a timed down ream at
0.1 ft/min for 15 ft until the first flag (F1) is
reached. These passes have now established
a trough for the BHA to lay in. There should
now be a ledge at bit depth that is about half
the diameter of the bit depending on the
firmness of the formation..
13. Continue by drilling new hole at 0.1 ft/min for

5 feet. This step is important – don't hurry!
14. Increase penetration rate to 0.25 ft/min for 5

feet.

15. Increase penetration rate to 0.5 ft/min for 5

feet.
16. Begin adding weight to increase penetration

up to 1.0 ft/min for 5 feet. A survey should
now show a slight change in angle.

18. After drilling about 30 ft from the kick-off

point and/or before a tool-face change, it is
advisable to make up to three back-
reams/down-reams at 5 ft/min from the new
TO to 50 ft above the kick-off point. This
extends the trough so future BHAs will drop in
and follow.

the formation. Therefore it is prudent to
perform the complete tool face change in
stages of about 60º per 5 ft which results in a
smooth turn.
4.9 WELL CONTROL
There are several methods for controlling a kick that can

be employed. The preferred method is called the
“Driller’s Method,” in which the kick is circulated out of the
well before increasing the mud weight. Three primary
reasons for using the “Driller’s Method” over the “Wait and
Weight Method” (in which the kill-weight mud is mixed
and the kick circulated out with the new mud) are: 1) the
kick is displaced from the hole faster using the “Driller’s
Method,” thereby minimizing gas migration; 2) the weak
point in the open hole will not be subjected to any higher
pressure using the “Driller’s Method” versus the “Wait and
Weight Method” because the kick will always be above
the window before any kill mud starts up the annulus
(open-hole annulus volume usually <20 bbl; CT volume
60 bbl); 3) an "accurate" shut-in CT pressure (SICTP) can
be difficult to obtain because, with drilling fluids typically
used, CT pressure drops off very slowly when the pumps
are disengaged. There will always be some doubt initially
regarding the mud weight required to kill the well. The
following recommendations should be used as guidelines
for well control during CTD operations:
• Circulating a gas kick out will usually require

reducing the pump rate when the gas arrives
at the surface to improve separation in the gas
buster and/or frac tank, thereby minimizing the
potential of a spill (mud spraying out of
buster/tank). Make sure that slow pump rates
are recorded on daily kick sheets and that
constant bottom-hole pressure is maintained.
Diversion options should be discussed during
rig-up on the well.
• Kick recognition is a primary concern and

returns should be monitored at all times during
the drilling operation. Other kick indicators
include an increase in flow to the pits, an
increased pressure drop through the choke
and other surface piping (higher wellhead
pressure), gassy fluid samples, etc.
• "Hole Fill" and "Displacement" calculations

should be performed for tripping operations.
The amount of mud to fill the hole on the trip
out, and the amount of mud displaced on the
trip in must be monitored, and any deviation

from these calculations must be investigated

to detect a kick while tripping. Recorded trip
sheets are required.
• To ensure that a slow pump rate/pump

pressure is known prior to a kick or pressure
increase, it is necessary to establish an off-
bottom "Slow Pump Rate" (Usually ±½ the
normal pump rate while drilling). The slow
pump rate and pressure should be recorded
for future reference during kill operations.
Slow pump rate should be checked and
recorded every 12 hours or 500 feet of new
hole drilled.
• If a kick is detected while drilling, the following

are recommended:
Pick up off bottom, shut in the pump, and

check for flow. If the well continues to flow,
shut in the HCR (hydraulically controlled
remote valve on the choke line that is full
opening) and record SICTP and shut-in
wellhead pressure (SIWHP). The pipe
should be kept moving during this time to
avoid danger of sticking, and the pack-off
should be monitored for leakage.
Circulate the kick out of the hole using the

Driller's Method. Note: When using bio-
polymer based drilling fluid, the CT
pressure is very slow in dropping off when
the pump is disengaged. This could give a
false SICTP reading. If there is
uncertainty, bring the pump to "Kill Speed"
holding constant WHP (equal to SIWHP)
until a stable CT pressure is achieved.
Use the choke to maintain this CT
circulating pressure plus a 100-150 psi
safety margin while pumping out the kick.
After pumping open-hole annular volume,
pull bit to cased hole slowly, leaving
uncontaminated mud in the open-hole
portion. The kick should continue to be
circulated out from this point while
monitoring pack-off, surface lines, and
BOP equipment.
Use caution when taking gas returns at

surface to avoid a spill. Reduce circulation
rate as necessary and ensure constant
BHP with the choke.
When the kick has been displaced out of

the hole, shut in the well again. If SICTP =
SIWHP = 0, perform a flow check.
Investigate potential reasons for the kick,
and evaluate if increased mud weight is
desired. If there is positive pressure,
calculate new mud weight and continue
with the second circulation of the Driller's
Method to displace the old mud with new
mud. Circulate new mud to the bit, holding
WHP constant at the SIWHP reading.
When new mud is at the bit, record CT
pressure, and hold it constant until new
mud is at surface.
• If a kick is detected while tripping, RIH

circulating at minimum rate holding WHP
constant with choke at the SIWHP reading.
Monitor in and out volumes while RIH at
constant WHP. If pit gain is equal to coil OD
displacement, continue to bottom. If any
discrepancy is noted, stop RIH and SI well
again to verify surface pressures. Gas influx
migration will be confirmed by increasing
surface pressure when the pipe is stationary.
Continue to RIH holding a higher WHP (if
SIWHP was higher) and adjust WHP up as
necessary such that returns from the well
equal coil OD displacement. (Implementing
the Volumetric Method can control gas
migration. However, it will be rare to

implement this procedure in CT Drilling, as trip

time to bottom is fast.) RIH to bottom and
circulate kick out with Driller's Method.
• If flow is detected while making up liner, stab

TIW valve and close. Shut annular preventer
on liner leaving HCR open. Set BOP slips on
liner. Shut in well with HCR. Make up CT to
TIW valve. Open TIW valve. Strip down
injector and make up to riser. PT riser.
Equalize and open annular and liner slips.
RIH with liner to kill well as per a kick detected
while tripping recommendation above. A TIW
valve should be on the rig floor with all
crossovers required for make up to liner and
back to CT. If liner is slotted/pre-perforated,
the TIW valve should be made up to a blank
liner joint and positioned for rapid deployment.
• In the event of a kick while out of the hole,

shut in the well and record shut-in pressure.
Shut in master valve, make up BHA with
nozzle that can be lubricated above the
master, and then RIH using the stripping
procedure above. Do not run into open hole.
Perform well kill from window. If it is not
possible to run into the hole and a BHA is
hanging across the stack and master valve,
then it may be necessary to bullhead to kill the
well.
Responsibilities
Regardless of the complexity of well-control issues

associated with a drilling operation, underbalanced or
overbalanced, it is essential that the necessary checks,
procedures and responsibilities are identified and
understood by the personnel involved. In most cases, it is
the responsibility of the driller to ensure that relevant
checks are made and that the data/information on which
the drilling operation is proceeding is current and
accurate. However, to enable this, the driller must
typically rely on the assistance of specialists or other
personnel who should in turn be aware of their
responsibilities and the need for safe drilling practices.
The following well-control issues relating to job
responsibilities and procedures are provided for guidance
in the preparation of procedures for a specific CTD
operation.
• It is the CTD operator's responsibility to close

in the well if a kick is indicated or suspected.
It is better to shut in the well as a
precautionary measure than to hesitate when
conditions may require closure of the BOP
equipment.
• The hole must be kept full of fluid at all times.

This is central to the philosophy of
overbalanced drilling, but may not be such a
requirement in some underbalanced
operations.
• Flow checks should be performed during all

drilling breaks.
• When tripping pipe, a trip sheet should be

completed and a flow check performed:
at the lowest casing shoe

prior to pulling BHA through the BOP
• Slow circulation rate check should be taken:
at the beginning of every tour/prior to every

RIH
any time the drilling fluid density is

changed

• When lost circulation occurs and cannot be

regained by circulation through the CT string,
the annulus should be filled with the lightest
fluid available (typically water) and volumes
recorded.
• Tripping out the hole without full return is

potentially dangerous and should only be
permitted under known conditions with
permission of the CTD superintendent.
• Drillers should be provided with procedures

detailing the actions to be taken if a well kicks
while drilling surface hole.
• Unless the following materials are available

for use at the rig site, drilling operations
should be reviewed and if necessary
suspended:
enough salt (KCl or NaCl) to raise the fluid

weight in the active mud system at least
3
120 kg/m or 1 ppg.
enough cement to place at least a 120-m

or 400-ft plug in open hole.
• Kick drills should be held on a weekly basis

or more often if the rig superintendent
considers it necessary. Details and results
of any drills should be logged in the drilling
report.
• BOP and related equipment should be

pressure- and function-tested at least every
14 days.
• A float or check valves should be run while

drilling and opening hole prior to setting
surface casing.
• An appropriate safety valve (TIW) to fit the

top of any BHA left hanging in the slips
should be kept on the rig floor.
• Casing/liner strings will be completely filled

from the top at least every five joints,
irrespective of the type of float equipment in
use.
• Wells should be shut in following the

procedures described in the well site
Standards of Operation. The relevant step-
by-step procedures for shutting the well in
should be posted in the vicinity of the driller’s
panel.
• The CT driller should check and confirm all

choke manifold, kill and choke lines for
correct positioning at the beginning of each
tour.
• The driller should know the true vertical

depth (TVD) measurements at all times.
• Prior to spudding, it is the responsibility of

the CTD Supervisor to review the well plan
and ensure that all primary well-
control/pressure-control issues have been
addressed.
• If the well cannot be closed in with the BOP,

the well should be properly secured and
tested by setting a plug.
• A well-control report should be completed by

the CT driller and CT Supervisor after all
well-control operations.
4.10 UNDERBALANCED DRILLING
One of the key advantages of CTD, through its unique

pressure control capabilities, is that it enables safe
underbalanced drilling (UBD). In preventing or avoiding
drilling damage, UBD is often perceived to be the ideal

solution to formation damage, especially in depleted

reservoirs where CTD techniques can be so effectively
applied. However, designing and conducting an UBD
operation can be a complex process which requires a
thorough knowledge of the risks (e.g., formation/wellbore
collapse) and hazards (e.g., safe handling of reservoir
fluids in the returned wellbore fluids).
4.10.1 Underbalanced Drilling Applications
CTD and conventional applications utilizing UBD

techniques include the following:
1. Limiting lost circulation while drilling through

elevated outcrops with low water table
2. Air drilling in competent crystalline rocks

(where changes in confining pressure do not
impact borehole stability)
3. Depleted reservoirs in which infill drilling is

performed to produce bypassed oil may be
hampered by lost circulation. These
operations can be simplified by UBD.
4. A growing number of horizontal wells with

uncemented completions have caused an
increasing interest in preventing formation
damage rather than curing it. In UBD,
impairment of the reservoir is largely
prevented by producing the reservoir section
while it is being drilled.
There are three general methods of achieving

underbalance, and the method used depends on the
relationship between formation pressure and normal
pressure gradient:
1. Formation is below normal pressure gradient.

To achieve conditions in which the well will
flow, use a liquid phase commingled with a
gas phase to lighten the annulus hydrostatic
pressure. The gas phase can be delivered via
gas lift (if installed) or commingled on surface
and circulated downhole.
2. Formation is at normal pressure gradient. The

well will flow if low-density drilling fluids such
as oil-base mud or crude-base systems are
used.
3. Formation above normal pressure gradient.

The well will flow simply by decreasing the
drilling fluid density below that which would
normally be used in overbalanced drilling. A
fluid density equal to or slightly less than the
formation gradient can be used in conjunction
with the equivalent circulating density (ECD)
providing a “balanced condition” while drilling.
Decreasing the ECD or back pressure at the
choke will allow the well to flow.
The following basic principles apply to flow control in

underbalanced drilling:
• A state of flowing equilibrium must exist that is

both controllable and within the operating
limits of the wellbore and surface equipment.
This state of equilibrium should create a
constant BHP and flowing rate.
• There must be a means of monitoring this

state of equilibrium to ensure that it is
maintained within the specified limits.
• There should be a convenient means of

returning the well to an overbalanced mode
(killing the well) in an emergency.

Control and regulation of wellbore pressures are obtained

by circulating well returns through an adjustable surface
choke. A second method of regulating wellbore
pressures in low-pressure reservoir applications, is the
injection of lift gas into the drilling fluid system.
Bottomhole pressure is best measured by means of a
downhole pressure gauge. The liquid phase of the drilling
fluid system generally has sufficient density to serve as a
kill fluid if an emergency occurs. If it does not, a separate
batch of special kill fluid must be available at the site.
4.10.2 Deployment Systems
If impairment reduction is the reason for choosing UBD on

a particular operation, it is generally preferable that the
complete operation be performed underbalanced.
Considerable impairment reduction can be expected if a
well is drilled underbalanced, circulated clean and
produced to fill the open-hole section with reservoir fluid
before it is brought under primary well control. However,
the benefits of UBD will be lost to some extent if this
procedure is followed for every trip. Also, spotting a
heavy pill on top of a lighter hydrocarbon column easily
leads to "flip-over," where the heavy fluid changes
position with the lighter fluid. If it is known that a reservoir
will not free flow due to its low pressure and gas/oil ratio,
allowing a well to kill itself through its own production
before it is opened for BHA deployment can be
considered. However, for most wells this is not a safe
option. If it is not intended to bring the well under primary
well control, some sort of sluice mechanism is required to
deploy the BHA in a pressurized well. A temporary
subsurface valve can be used, or a deployment riser at
surface may be considered. If the reservoir section is
drilled through the completion string, a permanent
subsurface safety valve may be an option.
Pressure Deployment
Probably the greatest feature that CT brings to UBD is the

ability to maintain a continuous state of underbalance
while drilling, tripping, and running completions.
However, during operations where the injector must be
removed (installing/removing the BHA and running a
completion), the well must be maintained in an
underbalanced condition. Pressure deployment of the
BHA is achieved using techniques developed for CT
logging of live wells. The procedure used depends on
factors such as:
• Length and diameter of the BHA
• BOP configuration
• Number of pressure barriers required
Following is a general guide for pressure deployment and

should be modified to suit specific circumstances. Since
most wells drilled underbalanced with CTD will involve
directional drilling, these procedures reflect the
deployment of a BHA of about 40 ft in length. Also, since
most drilling would be for small hole sizes, the bit is
assumed to be 4¾ in. with the BHA having a nominal
diameter of 3½ in. A simple method of deploying short
BHAs with mud-pulse MWD is to use a wireline lubricator
type deployment riser made up to the appropriate length
(Figure 30). This requires a set of slip/seal rams and a
set of blind/shear rams to be located in the BOP stack
and the use of a deployment bar (a special sub that
installs in the BHA and allows closing of the of the
specified slip/seal rams on the correct diameter).

Figure 30. BHA Deployment Under Pressure (with

Mud-Pulse MWD Systems)
1. Using the wireline system, pull the assembled

BHA up inside the lubricator.
2. With the blind/shear rams closed, install the

lubricator onto the BOP stack (Figure 31) and
equalize pressure.
Figure 31. Typical CTD BOP Stack
3. Open blind/shear rams and lower the BHA

with the wireline system to allow closure on
the deployment bar.
4. When located properly, close the slip/seal

rams on the BHA.
5. Bleed off and remove the lubricator.
6. Make up the tubing to the BHA and lower the

injector to make up to the BOPs and equalize
pressure.
7. Open slip/seal rams and run in with the BHA.
The reverse applies for pulling the BHA from the well.
However, the most commonly used short BHAs are run

on CT with wireline installed inside. These BHAs are
typically made up and pulled up into the lubricator. With
the blind/shear rams closed, the injector and lubricator
are installed on the BOPs and the pressure equalized.

The blind/shear rams are then opened and the BHA run
into the well.
For longer BHAs, or where a lubricator of sufficient length

cannot be obtained, it may be necessary to deploy the
BHA in stages (see Figure 31):
1. Using the wireline system, pull the first section

of the BHA up inside the lubricator.
2. With the blind/ shear rams closed, install the

lubricator onto the BOPs and equal-ize
pressure.
3. Open blind/shear rams and lower the BHA

section with the wireline system to allow for
closure on the deployment bar.
4. When properly located, close the slip/seal

rams on the deployment bar.
5. Remove the lubricator.
6. Pull the second section of BHA up inside

lubricator and equalize pressure.
7. Move lubricator over and make up the second

BHA section to the first BHA section. This
may require some rigging up to enable screw-
ing together the sections. Lower lubricator
and make up to BOPs.
8. Open the slip/seal rams and lower the BHA.
9. When properly positioned, close the slip/seal

rams on the deployment bar and bleed
pressure.
10. Remove the lubricator, install the injector

and equalize pressure.
11. Run the BHA into the well.
Deployment of completions systems in an underbalanced

well can be done in much the same manner as for the
BHA. If the completion involves a CT completion,
deployment is simpler than for jointed-pipe completions.
The deployment bar is a special sub installed in the BHA
that allows closing the specified slip/seal rams on the
correct diameter. The bar has shoulders above and
below the closing diameter to prevent the bar from sliding
through the rams.
4.10.3 Mechanical Considerations
The following mechanical aspects of UBD should be

considered:
1. Hydraulically operated BHA components
2. Tubing collapse pressure
3. H2S corrosion/embrittlement
4.10.3.1 Hydraulically Operated BHA

Components
Some BHA components are operated hydraulically, using

the pressure differential between the drillstring and the
annulus. This mechanism is likely to be disturbed when
drilling in an underbalanced mode. This is due to the
different fluid compositions in the drillstring and annulus,
caused by hydrocarbon production and gas injection.
These different fluid columns create a permanent
pressure differential, preventing unlocking hydraulically
operated tools. Note that mud-pulse MWD systems will
not work with two-phase fluid systems.
4.10.3.2 Tubing Collapse Pressure
When deep gas wells are drilled underbalanced, the

massive gas influx can cause surface pressure in the

annulus to rise well above drill-pipe pressure. Special

attention must therefore be paid to the collapse pressure
rating of the drillpipe. This applies particularly to CTD,
since CT has a lower collapse rating than conventional
drill pipe.
4.10.3.3 H2S Corrosion/Embrittlement
If hydrogen sulfide is produced with hydrocarbons,

allowance must be made for aggravated corrosion of
drillstring components. In UBD, these components are in
contact with much larger amounts of H2S than would be
the case with overbalanced drilling.
Very important: Do not use high-strength CT grades; do

use H2S inhibitors, take good care of the CT string; and
avoid mechanical damage.
4.10.4 Surface Equipment
Surface systems can either be open or closed

(pressurized). Closed systems are used to handle
potentially dangerous gases. This type of system is
closed to the atmosphere and all operations take place
under pressure (Figure 32). The major difference
between closed and open systems is that in closed
systems returns are taken from the choke and routed
through a series of enclosed vessels that separate
gas/oil/water and solids. A closed system is desirable for
environmental concerns, and for wells producing H2S.
Closed systems are generally restricted to use when
surface pressures are low, although high-pressure
systems can be built.
An open system essentially comprises standard

equipment used on many rigs for well testing (Figure 33).
Returns are taken through an adjustable choke, which is
used to help regulate the flow rate and bottomhole
pressure. Generally, the choke is fully opened and the
flow/BHP controlled by adjusting gas/liquid injection rates.
In a very simple system, returns are then routed through
an atmospheric degasser (or series of degassers) to
remove any gas. At this stage, the returns still contain oil,
water and cuttings. Next, the returns are routed through a
series of settling/skimming tanks where the oil is removed
and the cuttings settle out. The drilling fluid is then flowed
to a tank for re-use.
4.10.5 Well Control
In underbalanced drilling (UBD), the well is “encouraged”

to flow. Nevertheless, there must also be constant “well
control” in that the fluid influx is controlled at all times
(from the time it enters the wellbore until it exits at the
surface). This control is achieved by maintaining a
constant flow and BHP. Another key factor is that in UBD
operations, primary well control is not maintained by the

drilling fluid. Instead, the CT equipment (stripper) and

associated pressure-control equipment (drilling manifold)
are the primary defense against blowouts. In almost all
UBD operations, there should be an means available of
returning the well to a static condition (i.e., killing the well
and circulating out any formation influx). The method
used to overbalance the well depends on how
underbalance was originally achieved. There are three
basic methods of achieving underbalance; the approach
selected depends on the relationship between formation
pressure and normal pressure gradient:
1. Formation pressure is below normal

pressure gradient. For the well to flow,
commingled fluids (e.g., Newtonian liquids
and nitrogen), gas lift or foam must be used to
reduce annular pressure. Parameters can be
adjusted as needed and reducing gas
injection rate can kill the well easily and
quickly. Downhole conditions must be
controlled to ensure that circumstances do not
arise where sections of the wellbore are
subjected to pressures above what they can
withstand, which could result in an
underground blowout.
2. Formation is at normal pressure gradient.

The well should flow if light fluids such as oil-
base mud or crude are used as a base for the
drilling fluid (constraints on pumping
flammable fluids apply). The degree of
underbalance is not as easily adjusted, since
light drilling fluid cannot be made heavier as
easily. However, having a suitable fluid on
hand and injecting this into the well can kill the
well in an emergency. Again, the pressures
encountered are not likely to cause problems
within the wellbore.
3. Formation is above normal pressure

gradient. The well will flow simply by
decreasing fluid density below that which
would normally be used in overbalanced
drilling. However, there may be a significant
risk that sections of the wellbore will
experience higher pressures than they can
withstand if the flow rate and BHP are allowed
to fluctuate significantly. Killing the well will
require significantly higher density fluid and
circulating a kick from the well would entail
risks as described previously for overbalanced
drilling. The use of UBD for wells of this
nature should not be considered unless there
is a high degree of certainty relating to the
pressures that are likely to be encountered
and the overlying formation strengths.
Common to all these cases is the possibility of
wellbore collapse due to UBD. Some
formations are highly unstable (e.g., sloughing
shales) and require significant wellbore
hydrostatic pressure to prevent collapse.
Should UBD be attempted in such conditions,
there is a significant risk of losing the well and
perhaps drilling assembly. Also, depending
on the pressure characteristics of the well,
wellbore instability could contribute to an
underground blowout or unwanted cross flow
between formations of dissimilar pressure.

5. POST-JOB REVIEW
Summary
After the well has been drilled and completed, a

comprehensive post-job review should be conducted.
This final step or process is often neglected. A complete
review of the CTD planning and execution will ensure that
all data and information from that data are generated,
reported, interpreted and used advantageously. This
review should provide background for future CTD
operations and input to the CTD data base for monitoring
operational efficiency and cost reduction. If the data are
of good quality (as this process will prove), then any
modifications that are necessary can be implemented
quickly and effectively to move the CTD operations to a
safer and more efficient level.
The time commitment required to prepare a post-job

summary should not be so great as to discourage this
valuable part of the process. It should be kept as simple
and straightforward as possible to encourage completion.
A fill-in-the-blank format and computerization are
recommended to make the exercise as efficient as
possible.
5.1 CTD PLANNING AND EXECUTION REVIEW
This first step in the review process is the responsibility of

the CTD engineer and requires identifying and
communicating to all involved parties the reporting
requirements and expectations from each
company/individual. These requirements should also be
given along with a scheduled due date for returning the
information. Some of the data that must be requested
and furnished to the CTD engineer are (see examples in
Attachments):
• final directional survey and plot of the well
• final copy of any logs recorded
• geology description of the cuttings collected
• complete record of bottom hole pressure data

including date and time
• BHA record
• bit and motor performance records
• completion liner tally
• revised wellbore sketch
• perforating record
• CT life data and estimated remaining life of

CT
• bottom-hole pressure records (if data

recorded)
• fluids report
• cementing data
• vendor performance reports
• full copy of all daily reports and accident

reports
After collecting these data, the CTD engineer needs to

interpret operational results and generate a final well
report that should at least answer the following questions:
1. What went well?
2. What went poorly?
3. What were the main problem areas/cost

drivers?

5. Post-Job Review
4. What modifications can be agreed on?
5. What were the most cost-effective operations?
6. What were the least effective operations?
Several computer programs are available that can help

store and generate this information and also aid in setting
up the data base needed to assimilate the data. These
can provide the engineer with the ability to quickly
generate information to determine areas of critical need
so changes or modifications can be performed
expeditiously. Questions about data acquisition during
the job can also be answered, such as:
1. Were the data complete, accurate and useful?
2. Which data were not required?
3. Was the quality of the data sufficient? Was it

excessive?
The engineer should be able at this point to generate all

of the information necessary to report to the regulatory
agency.
5.2 CTD OPERATIONS REVIEW
The CTD engineer should meet with the CTD Supervisor,

Reservoir Engineer, and Geologist and discuss the entire
operation. This meeting must be an open communication
process for all to gain insight into the CTD performance
and what is needed to meet the requirements of future
wells. Several important items that must be discussed
are:
• Evaluate the performance of all vendors
Must be evaluated with respect to both

personnel and equipment
Record the amount of downtime

associated with each vendor
Describe in detail the reason(s) for

downtime
What were the root causes of failures?

Should there be an incentive contract with
the vendor?
• What solutions were or should be

implemented?
Who should implement?

Timing of implementation
What testing should be done?
How should solutions be implemented?
• What operating cost reductions should be
implemented?
How will it impact the operation as a

whole?
Is it safety oriented or does it sacrifice

safety?
How should implementation take place?

Who is responsible for implementation?
• Were the CTD operations performed safely
and the wellbore objectives met?
What safety issues have not been

resolved and how can they be resolved?

5. Post-Job Review
If we missed our objectives, what part(s)

of the operation contributed to the
problems?
Were the objectives clear and agreed on

as obtainable?
Is there additional testing that needs to be

done to meet these objectives in the
future?
What lessons were learned from this

project?
• Were all procedures in place for the

operations?
Did any contingencies occur that were not

planned for?
After this meeting of the operating company personnel,

the CTD Engineer and CTD Supervisor should then meet
individually with each vendor and review any issues that
need the vendor’s action. There should also be a
collective meeting with all of the vendors to review and
discuss the operation(s) and any potential problems or
solutions to problems that occurred or could arise. Do not
let this become a “finger-pointing” session, but direct it
toward an enhancement of the entire operation. In this
meeting, a team mentality should be conveyed to
complete the work safely and efficiently. Anything from
the planning of the well to the final operation should be
open for suggestions or solutions to improve the CTD
operation. The main point to remember is that the CTD
operations must be performed safely and wellbore
objectives met.
5.3 ACTION PLAN
As a result of the Operations Review meetings, an action

plan should be in place with responsibilities assigned as
well as a time frame for completing each action item. A
complete list of modifications required prior to the next
CTD job should be generated and maintained by the CTD
engineer. All responsible parties are to report back to the
CTD engineer on the modifications implemented and the
status of any action items assigned on an agreed upon
schedule. If a vendor cannot implement the needed
modifications, other options should be discussed to
determine suitability for the upcoming CTD operations,
else a possible change of vendors may be required. No
part of the CTD operation should be performed that
inhibits the safety of the operation and precludes
obtaining the wellbore objectives agreed on.
Finally, time and money has been spent to generate a

safe and efficient operation. Therefore, take the time and
effort required to update and maintain a database for
continually monitoring CTD operations. There are many
computer software products on the market to help in
developing and maintaining a database. Additionally, this
should bring about two desired results: 1) operations
improvement and 2) cost reduction.

6. CTD REFERENCES
1. Adams, N.J., Mack, S.K., Fannin, V.R., and

Rocchi, Thierry, 1996: “Coiled-Tubing
Applications for Blowout-Control Operations,”
Journal of Petroleum Technology, May.
2. Al-Hathy, Salim Said and Kalam, Mohammed

Zubair, 1997: “Coiled Tubing Applications in
the Sultanate of Oman,” SPE 38396,
presented at the 1997 SPE/ICoTA North
American Coiled Tubing Roundtable held in
Montgomery, Texas, April 1-3.
3. Allbee, James D., 1999: “Coiled Tubing Hang-

offs: A Simple, Yet Effective Tool for the
Future,” SPE 52121, presented at the 1999
SPE Mid-Continent Operations Symposium
held in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, March 28-
31.
4. American Oil & Gas Reporter Staff, 1999:

“CTD Proves Tough to Top in Right
Applications,” American Oil & Gas Reporter,
March.
5. Atherton, G.M. and Davis, M., 1996: “Coiled

Tubing Drilling of Horizontal Re-Entry Wells,
UK Land,” SPE 35546, presented at SPE
(location unknown).
6. Balen, Mark, Foose, Joe, Schershel, Steve

and Strashok, Gary, 1997: “Horizontal Coiled
Tubing Drilling A Multi-Well Project at Clive,
Alberta,” Paper No. 97-116, presented at the
CADE/CAODC Spring Drilling Conference
held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, April 8-10.
7. Barney, Harvey E. and Overstreet, Charles C.,

1999: “Successful Underbalanced Drilling by
Pumping Nitrogen Through Coiled Tubing and
a Vane Motor in the Low Pressured Pettit
Lime Formation,” SPE 54497, presented at
the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable
held in Houston, Texas, May 25-26.
8. Bass, A.C. and Hearn, D.D., 1995: "North

Slope Coiled Tubing Drilling Experience,"
World Oil's 3rd International Conference and
Exhibition on Coiled Tubing Technology:
Operations, Services, Practices; Houston,
Texas, March 13-16.
9. Beckman, Jeremy, 1997: “Coiled Tubing,

Reamer Shoes Push Through Barriers in
North Sea Wells,” Offshore, February.
10. Bell, G.; Fleck, A.; Hoekstra, T.; van Beelen,

N.; van Venrooy, J.; and Weihe, A., 2000:
“Underbalanced Drilling with Coiled Tubing in
Oman”, SPE 57571, presented at the 1999
SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology,
Abu Dhabi, November 8-10.
11. Bell, Steven S., 1997: “Adjustable Stabilizers

Increase Rotary Drilling Performance,” World
Oil, June.
12. Bijleveld, A.F., 1999: “ICoTA’s CT Drilling

Training and Competence Guidelines – How
to Use Them,” SPE 54462, presented at the
1999 SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable
held in Houston, Texas, May 25-26.
13. Bingham, Brian, 2000: “Rotational Toolface

Orientation to Facilitate Coiled Tubing Target
Acquisition”, IADC/SPE 62738, presented at
the 2000 IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling
Technology held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,
September 11-13.
14. Blount, C.G., Gantt, L.L., Hearn, D.D.,

Mooney, M.B., Smith, B.E., Quinn, D. and
Larson, E.B., 1998: “Development Update of
an MWD Directional Drilling Package for 2¾”
Openhole: Tiny Tools,” SPE 46016, presented
at the 1998 SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing

6. CTD References
Roundtable held in Houston, Texas, April 15-

16.
15. Blount, C.G., Mooney, M.B., Smith, B.E.,

Quinn, D. and Larson, E.B., 1997:
“Development and Case Histories of an MWD
Directional Drilling Package for 2¾" CT,” SPE
38613, presented at the 1997 SPE Annual
Technical Conference and Exhibition held in
San Antonio, Texas, October 5-8.
16. Boberly, L., Brazier, R., Giddings, C. and Cox,

R., 1997: “Coiled Tubing Horizontal
Underbalanced Drilling Project; Costs and
Operational Analyses,” SPE 38399, presented
nd
at the 2 North American Coiled Tubing
Roundtable held in Montgomery, Texas, April
1-3.
17. Borbely, L., Brazier, R., Giddings, C. and Cox,

R., 1997: “Costs and Operational Analyses of
a Coiled Tubing Horizontal Underbalanced
Drilling Project,” Paper No. 97-102, presented
at the CADE/CAODC Spring Drilling
Conference held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada,
April 8-10.
18. Bouroumeau-Fuseau, Patrick; Mackay, Stuart;

and Simondin, Armel, 2000: “Coiled Tubing
Drilling Cost-Efficient in Chasing Alwyn’s
Small Oil Pockets”, Offshore, April.
19. Brunskill, D. and Campbell, A., 2000:

“Advances in Coiled-Tubing Jetting
Technology”, SPE 60721, presented at the
2000 SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable,
Houston, April 5-6.
20. Burge, P., 1996: “Horizontal Drilling Using

Coiled Tubing – from Demonstration to
Growth,” THERMIE Project No. OG/216/93,
th
presented at the 1996 5 European Union
Hydrocarbons Symposium held in Edinburgh,
Scotland, November 26-28.
21. Buset, Per and O’Neil, John, 1998: “Coiled

Tubing Sidetrack Taps Bypassed Reserves,”
World Oil, April.
22. Byrom, T.G., 1999: “Coiled-Tubing Drilling In

Perspective,” JPT, June.
23. Cheung, V., Christensen, D., Davis, R., Lee,

J., MacKinnon, M. and Hollies, D., 1997:
“Application of Coiled Tubing Underbalanced
Horizontal Drilling in the Hussar Glauconitic
th
‘A’ Pool,” presented at the SPE/CIM 6
Annual One-Day Conference on Horizontal
Well Technology: “Improving Profitability in
Diverse Horizontal Well Applications,” held in
Calgary, November 12.
24. Chitty, Greg H., 1998: “Corrosion Issues with

Underbalanced Drilling in H2S Reservoirs,”
SPE 46039, presented at the 1998
SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable held in
Houston, Texas, April 15-16.
25. Choe, Jonggeun and Juvkam-Wold, Hans C.,

1996: “A Simplified Well Control Model for
Horizontal Slimholes and Coiled Tubing
Drilling,” SPE 37076, presented at the 1996
SPE International Conference on Horizontal
Well Technology held in Calgary, Canada,
November 18-20.
26. Comeaux, Blaine, 1997: “Update on

Applications of Coiled Tubing Drilling
Orientation and Monitoring,” presented at the
th
PNEC 5 International Conference on Coiled
Tubing Technology, Philip C. Crouse &
Associates, held in Dallas, Texas, January 8-
10.
27. Comeaux, Blaine, 1998: “Coiled Tubing

Drilling Operations Experiences,” presented at

6. CTD References
the 1998 IBC Coiled Tubing Conference held

in Houston, Texas, June 29-30.
28. Cox, R., 1996: “Horizontal Underbalanced

Drilling in a Sour Gas Carbonate Using Coiled
Tubing: A Case Study,” SPE 37075,
presented at the 1996 SPE International
Conference on Horizontal Well Technology
held in Calgary, Canada, November 18-20.
29. Cox, R.J., 1999: “Coiled Tubing Horizontal

Underbalanced Drilling in the Elkton
Formation of Central Alberta,” Paper 99-107,
presented at the CADE/CAODC Spring
Drilling Conference, Calgary, April 7-8.
30. Cox, R.J.; Li, Jeff; and Lupick, G.S., 1999:

“Horizontal Underbalanced Drilling of Gas
Wells with Coiled Tubing,” SPE Drilling &
Completion, SPE 55036 (revised from SPE
37676), March.
31. Crouse, P.C. and Lunan, W.B., 2000: “Coiled

Tubing Drilling – Expanding Application Key to
Future,” SPE 60706, presented at the 2000
32. Crouse, Philip C., 1997: “Jointed Pipe,

Snubbing, Hybrid, or CT Rigs – Options and
st
Risks for the 21 Century Drilling and
th
Operator,” presented at the 1997 5 Annual
International Conference on Coiled Tubing
Technology, Philip C. Crouse & Associates,
held in Dallas, Texas, January 8-10.
33. Crow, Walter, 1999: “Coiled Tubing Safety

Manual,” DOE/SW/41286-1, Topical Report
for National Petroleum Technology Office,
U.S. Department of Energy, January.
34. Curtis, Fred and Lunan, Brian, 1997:

“Horizontal Underbalanced Drilling – A
Canadian Overview,” PNEC 5CT-#15,
th
presented at the 5 International PNEC
Conference on Coiled Tubing held in Dallas,
Texas, January 8-10.
35. Cuthbertson, Robert L. and Vozniak, John,

1997: “Coiled Tubing Drilling: Applications for
Underbalanced Drilling – Surface Design and
th
Systems,” presented at the 5 International
PNEC Conference on Coiled Tubing held in
Dallas, Texas, January 8-10.
36. DeRouen, Mark, 1999: “Wells Successfully

Drilled and Completed with CT in the Gulf of
Mexico,” presented at the 1999 SPE/ICoTA
Coiled Tubing Roundtable held in Houston,
Texas, May 25-26.
37. Dickinson, Wade, 1997: “Petrolphysics Petro

Jet Multi-Lateral System and Petro Jet
Extended Reach System,” presented at the
th
1997 5 Annual International Conference on
Coiled Tubing Technology, Philip C. Crouse &
Associates, held in Dallas, Texas, January 8-
10.
st
38. Drilling Contractor Staff, 1996: “UK’s 1
Underbalanced, Multi-Lateral, CT-Drilled Well
Boosts Production 400%,” July.
39. Elsborg, C., Carter, J. and Cox, R., 1996:

“High Penetration Rate Drilling with Coiled
Tubing,” SPE 37074, presented at the 1996
SPE International Conference on Horizontal
Well Technology held in Calgary, Canada,
November 18-20.
40. Elsborg, C.C., Graham, R.A. and Cox, R.J.,

1996: “Large Diameter Coiled Tubing Drilling,”
SPE 37053, presented at the 1996 SPE
International Conference on Horizontal Well
Technology held in Calgary, Canada,
November 18-20.

6. CTD References
41. Flynn, T.S. and Jahn, B., 2000: “Vibration

Analysis for Coil Tubing Drilling in Prudhoe
Bay,” SPE 60751, presented at the 2000
42. Gaddy, Dean E., 2000: “Coiled-Tubing

Drilling Technologies Target Niche Markets,”
Oil & Gas Journal, January 10.
43. Gassø, Gjerde, K. and Samsonsen, B., 1998:

“The First Coiled Tubing Sidetrack in Norway,
Gulfaks Field,” IADC/SPE 39305, presented at
the 1998 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference held
in Dallas, Texas, March.
44. Gauthier, Sammy, McGavern, Cecil and

Sides, Winfield, 1997: “Advancements in
SPOOLABLE Completions to Accommodate
Wireline Operations,” ICoTA/SPE 38401,
nd
presented at the 2 North American Coiled
Tubing Roundtable held in Montgomery,
Texas, April 1-3.
45. Gebhardt, Freddy, Eby, Dan and Barnett,

David, 1996: “Novel Coiled Tubing Application
Controls Large LPG Storage Well Fire,” World
Oil, June.
46. Geddes, Bob and Sola, Sonny, 1997: “The

Continuous Drill String Rig: ‘A Drilling Solution
to a Drilling Problem,’” Paper No. 97-143,
presented at the CADE/CAODC Spring
Drilling Conference held in Calgary, April 8-10.
47. Giddings, Charles, 1997: “Operational

Practices for Coiled Tubing Drilling,”
th
presented at the 1997 5 Annual International
Conference on Coiled Tubing Technology,
Philip C. Crouse & Associates, held in Dallas,
Texas, January 8-10.
48. Gleitman, D.D., Hardin, J.R., Hightower, C.M.,

Ganti, L.L., Smith, B.E., Upchurch, E.R. and
Smith, M.B., 1996: “Newly Applied BHA
Elements Contribute Toward Mainstreaming
Coiled Tubing Drilling Applications,” presented
at the 1996 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference
held in New Orleans, Louisiana, March 12-15.
49. Goodrich, G.T., Smith, B.E. and Larson, E.B.,

1996: “Coiled Tubing Drilling Practices at
Prudhoe Bay,” IADC/SPE 35128, presented at
the 1996 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference held
in New Orleans, Louisiana, March 12-15.
50. Graham, R., 1997: “Underbalanced Drilling

With Coiled Tubing: A Safe, Economical
Method for Drilling and Completing Gas
Wells,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum
Technology, Vol. 36, No. 8, September.
51. Graham, R.A., Cox, R.J., Stadlwieser, J.A.

and Stinn, R., 1999: “Horizontal Re-Entry
Drilling with Coiled Tubing: A Viable
Technology,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum
Technology, Vol. 38, No. 10, October.
52. Graham, Robert A., 1998: “Planning For

Underbalanced Drilling With Coiled Tubing?
The Feasibility Study and Computer
Modeling,” SPE 46042, presented at the 1998
53. Grigor, C., 2000: “Development of a Single-

Trip Coiled Tubing Sidetracking System,”
SPE/Petroleum Society of CIM 65532,
presented at the 2000 SPE/Petroleum Society
of CIM International Conference on Horizontal
Well Technology held in Calgary, Alberta,
Canada, November 6-8.
54. Gulrajani, S. N. and Olmstead, C. C., 2000:

“Coiled-Tubing Conveyed Fracture
Treatments,” SPE 57432, presented at the

6. CTD References
1999 SPE Eastern Regional Meeting,

Charleston, West Virginia, October 21-22.
55. Gunningham, M.C., Coe, B., Evans, S. and

Wiersma, J., 1997: “Coiled Tubing Drilling
Case History, Offshore The Netherlands,”
SPE/ICoTA North American Coiled Tubing
1-3.
56. Hall, Jack and Wijingaards, Ben M., 1998:

“Slickline Power Unit on Coiled Tubing
Provides Innovative Solution for Setting a
Nippleless Lock in a Multilateral Completion,”
IADC/SPE 47847, presented at the 1998
IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Conference
held in Jakarta, Indonesia, September 7-9.
57. Hart’s Petroleum Engineer International Staff,

1996: “Downhole Control – The Key To Coiled
Tubing Drilling Efficiency,” July.
58. Head, P.F., Hanson, T.J., Yuratich, M. and

Turner, D.R., 1998: “Electric Coiled Tubing
Drilling – The First Steps Toward a Smart CT
Drilling System,” SPE 46013, presented at the
1998 SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable
held in Houston, Texas, April 15-16.
59. Hearn, D.D., Blount, C.G. and Kamlowsky,

P.E., 1996: “Coiled Tubing Window Milling,”
IADC/SPE Drilling Conference held in New
Orleans, Louisiana, March 12-15.
60. Hecht, Gordon and Jackson, Robert, 1998:

“Through Tubing, Rotary Drilling and Coiled
Tubing Drilling in Alaska,” presented at the
IBC Petroleum Engineering Conference,
Aberdeen, UK, September 22-24.
61. Hightower, C.M. and Blount, C.G., 1997:

“ARCO Coiled Tubing Drilling & Production
th
Update,” presented at the 1997 5 Annual
International Conference on Coiled Tubing
Technology, Philip C. Crouse & Associates,
held in Dallas, Texas, January 8-10.
62. Hightower, C.M., 1997: “An Operator’s Coiled

th
Tubing Drilling History,” presented at the 5
International Conference on: Coiled Tubing
and Well Intervention held at the Sheraton
Astrodome Hotel, Houston, Texas, February
4-6.
63. Hightower, C.M., 1997: “Operator’s Coiled

Tubing Drilling Program Gets Good Results,”
World Oil, October.
64. Hongren, Gu and Walton, Ian C., 1996:

“Designing Under and Near Balanced Coiled
Tubing Drilling Using Computer Simulations,”
SPE 35665, presented at the Western
Regional Meeting held in Anchorage, Alaska,
May 22-24.
65. Hupp, Jeffrey L., et al., 2001: "Improvements

in Coiled-Tubing Window-Milling Operations
Cut Costs and Increase Reliability, Prudhoe
Bay, Alaska," SPE 68432, Coiled Tubing
Roundtable, March 7-8.
66. Journal of Petroleum Technology Staff, 1996:

“New BHA Tools for Coiled Tubing Drilling,”
JPI, August.

“Application of Coiled-Tubing-Drilling
Technology on a Deep Underpressured Gas
Reservoir,” JPT, June.

“Brent’s First Coiled-Tubing-Drilled Well,” JPT,
June.

6. CTD References

“High-Penetration-Rate Drilling With Coiled
Tubing,” JPT, June.

“Large-Diameter Coiled-Tubing Drilling,” JPT,
February.
71. Kara, D.T., Gantt, L.L., Blount, C.G. and

Hearn, D.D., 1999: “Dynamically
Overbalanced Coiled Tubing Drilling on the
North Slope of Alaska,” SPE 54496,
presented at the 1999 SPE/ICoTA Coiled
Tubing Roundtable held in Houston, Texas,
May 25-26.
72. Kazakov, Serguei and Rispler, Keith, 2000:

“Optimizing and Managing Coiled Tubing Frac
Strings,” SPE 60747, presented at the 2000
73. Kirk, Andrew and Sembiring, Taufiq, 1999:

“Application of CTD Offshore, Indonesia
Phase One Pilot Project,” SPE 54502,
May 25-26.
74. Kjell-Inge Sola and Lund, Bjørnar, 2000: “New

Downhole Tool for Coiled Tubing Extended
Reach,” SPE 60701, presented at the 2000
75. Knapp, Paul, van Walsum, Eric and Schuler,

Joe, 1999: “Advances in the Control of Coiled
Tubing Units,” Paper 99-137, presented at the
CADE/CAODC Spring Drilling Conference
held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, April 7 and
8.
76. Koper, M.G.M., 1999: “The Galileo

Experience,” SPE/IADC 57570, presented at
the 1999 SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling
Technology Conference held in Abu Dhabi,
UAE, November 8-10.
77. Lambert, M., 2000: “Multilateral Well Leg Re-

Entry Made Possible With a Unique Coiled
Tubing Downhole Tool,” SPE 60702,
April 5-6.
78. Larson, Eric, Huffman, Alan, William, Brock A.

and Snisarenko, P., 1997: “Hybrid Rig
Development Aids North Slope CT
Operations,” World Oil, August.
79. Leising, L.J. and Walton, I.C., 1998: “Cuttings

Transport Problems and Solutions in Coiled
Tubing Drilling,” IADC/SPE 39300, presented
held in Dallas, Texas, March 3-6.
80. Leising, L.J., Hearn, D.D., Rike, E.A.,

Doremus, D.M. and Paslay, P.R., 1996:
“Sidetracking Technology for Coiled-Tubing
Drilling,” Journal of Petroleum Technology,
May.
81. Leismer, Dwayne, Williams, Brock and

Pursell, John, 1996: “Coiled Tubing Drilling:
Real Time MWD With Dedicated Powers to
the BHA,” OTC 8227, presented at the
Offshore Technology Conference held in
Houston, Texas, May 6-9.
82. Leniek, Humberto; Paz, Luis; and Solanet,

Fernando, 2000: “Coiled Tubing Used as a
Continuous-Sucker-Rod System in Slim
Holes,” SPE 56671, presented at the 1999
SPE Annual Technical Conference and
Exhibition, Houston, October 3-6.

6. CTD References
83. Lord, D.J., Brinkhorst J.G., Robertson, T.J.

and Martin, R.H., 1998: “Coiled Tubing Drilling
on the North Cormorant Platform,” SPE
46046, presented at the 1998 SPE/ICoTA
Texas, April 15-16.
84. Lord, David and Anderson, David, 1998: “CTD

System Allows Simultaneous Offshore
Operations,” World Oil, February.
85. Lord, David, Brinkhorst, Jan, Townsley, Bill

and Bogaert, Philip, 1997: “Shell Expro’s First
Application of Coiled Tubing Drilling,” World
Oil, June.
86. Lord, David, Brinkhorst, Jan, Townsley, Bill

and Bogaert, Philip, 1997: “Shell Expro’s First
Application of Coiled Tubing Drilling,”
th
presented at the 5 International Conference
on: Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention held
at the Sheraton Astrodome Hotel, Houston,
Texas, February 4-6.
87. Luft, H.B. and Wilde, G., 1999: “Industry

Guidelines for Underbalanced Coiled-Tubing
Drilling of Critical Sour Wells,” SPE 54483,
presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing
Roundtable held in Houston, Texas, May 25-
26.
88. Lunan, Brian, 1997: “Underbalanced Drilling

th
with Coiled Tubing,” presented at the 5
International PNEC Conference on Coiled
Tubing held in Dallas, Texas, January 8-10.
89. Lunan, Brian, 2000: “Technology

Advancements Spur CT Drilling Growth,” The
American Oil & Gas Reporter, February.
90. Maranuk, C.A., Gaynor, T.M., Chen, D. C-K

and Pruitt, J., 2000: “A Concept of a New
Steerable Drilling System for Coiled Tubing,”
91. Marker, Roy, Haukvik, John, Terry, James B.,

Paulk, Martin D., Coats, E. Alan, Wilson, Tom,
Estep, Jim, Farabee, Mark, Berning, Scott A.
and Song, Haoshi, 2000: “Anaconda: Joint
Development Project Leads to Digitally
Controlled Composite Coiled Tubing Drilling
System,” SPE 60750, presented at the 2000
92. McGregor, B., Cox, R. and Best, J., 1997:

“Application of Coiled Tubing Drilling
Technology on a Deep Underpressured Gas
Reservoir,” SPE 38397, presented at the 1997
SPE/ICoTA North American Coiled Tubing
1-3.
93. McMillin, Kevin, 1999: “Downhole Options

Developing Around Coiled Tubing,” Offshore,
February.
94. Meek, Dale E.; Staal, Timo W.; and Tinkham,

Scott K., 2000: “Wired BHA for
Underbalanced Coiled-Tubing Drilling,”
IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, New Orleans,
February 23-25.
95. Milligan, M., Andreychuk, M. and Lunan, B.,

1996: “Coiled Tubing Drilling of Horizontal
Sidetrack in House Mountain Field, Alberta,”
Orleans, Louisiana, March 12-15.
96. Mix, K., Bell, G., Evans, S.J., 1996: “Coiled

Tubing Drilling Case History,” SPE 36350,
st
presented at the 1 SPE/ICoTA North

6. CTD References
America Coiled Tubing Roundtable held in

Conroe, Texas, February 26-28.
97. Moon, Robert G., Ovitz, Robert W., Guild, G.

John and Biggs, Michael D., 1997: “Program
Tests Limits of CT Drilling,” The American Oil
& Gas Reporter, February.
98. Moon, Robert G., Ovitz, Robert W., Guild, G.

John and Biggs, Michael D., 1996: “Shallow
Gas Well Drilling with Coiled Tubing in the
San Juan Basin,” SPE 36463, presented at
1996 SPE Annual Technical Conference and
Exhibition held in Denver, October 6-9.
99. Newman, K.R., 1999: “Coiled-Tubing Stretch

and Stuck-Point Calculations,” SPE 54458,
Tubing Roundtable held in Houston, May 25-
26.
100. Newman, K.R., Stone, L.R. and Wolhart, S.,

1996: “The Feasibility of Using an Electric
Downhole Motor to Drill with Coiled Tubing,”
st
SPE 36343, presented at the 1 SPE/ICoTA
North America Coiled Tubing Roundtable held
in Conroe, Texas, February 26-28.
101. Newman, Ken, 1996: “CTD Poised To Make

An Impact on Segments of Drilling Market,”
The American Oil & Gas Reporter, April.
102. Offshore Staff, 1996: “Drilling Association

Supports a Wider Role for Coiled Tubing,”
Offshore, October.
103. Offshore Staff, 2000: “Drillship Designed for

Coiled Tubing Drilling, Completion of Subsea
Wells,” Offshore, June.
104. Oil & Gas Journal Staff, 1997: “BP Tests

Offshore Coiled Tubing Slim Hole Drilling,”
O&GJ, May 12.
105. Østvang, Knut, Haukvik, John, Skeie, Terje

and Hallundbaek, Jørgen, 1997: “World’s First
Successful Horizontal Wireline Tractor
th
Operations,” presented at the 5 International
Conference on: Coiled Tubing and Well
Intervention, Houston, Texas, February 4-6.
106. Pedersen, Knut, Ørisland, Svein, Spilling, Ivar,

Bralie, Rolf, Hargreaves, Tony, Londdale,
Paul, Crawford, Jim and Braddick, Britt, 1997:
“Multilateral Branch Drilling Through Tubing,
with Coiled Tubing Drilling, Planned for Snorre
Field, Snorre TLP (Tension Leg Platform) in
th
North Sea, Norway,” presented at the 5
International Conference on: Coiled Tubing
and Well Intervention, Houston, Texas,
February 4-6.
107. Pitman, Malcolm, Rafferty, Robin and

Ferguson, Andy, 1997: “Casing Exit
Techniques Using Coiled Tubing: Worldwide
Case Histories,” SPE 38428, presented at the
1997 SPE/ICoTA North American Coiled
Tubing Roundtable in Montgomery, Texas,
April 1-3.
108. Portman, Lance, 1999: “Reducing The Risk,

Complexity and Cost of Coiled Tubing
Drilling,” Petroleum Engineer International,
July.
109. Qiu, W.Y., Miska, S.Z. and Volk, L.J., 1999:

“Effect of Coiled Tubing Initial Configuration
on Buckling Behavior in Deviated Wells,”
Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Energy
Resources Technology, Vol. 121, September.
110. Qiu, Weiyong, 1999: “Force Transmission of

Coiled Tubing in Horizontal Wells,” SPE
54584, presented at the 1999 SPE/ICoTA
Texas, May 25-26.

6. CTD References
111. Rose, D., Kehler, T., Proctor, R. and

Campbell, B., 1999: “Optimizing Coiled-
Tubing Training with Computer Simulation
Modeling,” SPE 54495, presented at the 1999
112. Salahudin, Sharifudin, Conrad, Bruce and

Maatjes, Rein, 1999: “Successful Application
of Coiled-Tubing-Conveyed Perforating
Techniques in Egyptian Wells,” SPE 53297,
presented at Middle East Oil Show and
Conference held in Bahrain, February 20-23.
113. Samsonsen, B., Jacobsen, B.G., Skagestad,

T. and Kerr, S., 1998: “Drilling and Completing
a High-Angle Well With Coiled Tubing
Technology,” SPE 48941, presented at the
1998 SPE Annual Technical Conference and
Exhibition held in New Orleans, Louisiana,
September 27-30.
114. Sanchez, Alfredo, Samuel, G. Robello, and

Johnson, Philip, 1996: “An Approach for the
Selection and Design of Slim Downhole
Motors for Coiled Tubing Drilling,” SPE 37054,
presented at the 1996 SPE Horizontal Drilling
Conference held in Calgary, Canada,
November 18-20.
115. Sas-Jaworsky II, Alex, 1997: “New Guidelines

Should Enhance Coiled Tubing Well Control
Security,” World Oil, December.
116. Selby, Bruce, Srinivasan, Nagan, Donnally,

Bob, Vincent, Randy and Wilke, Jerry, 1998:
“Hybrid Coiled Tubing System for Offshore
Re-Entry Drilling and Workover,” IADC/SPE
39374, presented at the 1998 IADC/SPE
Drilling Conference held in Dallas, March 3-6.
117. Sjonberg, Geir, 1997: “Coiled Tubing Drilling:

Successful Drilling Offshore in the North Sea,”
th
on: Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention held
at the Sheraton Astrodome Hotel, Houston,
Texas, February 4-6.
118. Sola, Sonny and Geddes, Bob, 1997:

“Continuous Drilling Rig - CDR-01 ‘A Driller’s
Solution to a Drilling Problem,’” presented at
th
the 1997 5 Annual International Conference
on Coiled Tubing Technology, Philip C.
Crouse & Associates, held in Dallas, Texas,
January 8-10.
119. Sørgård, Eirik, Østvik, Egil, Grønnerød, Njål,

Svanes, Grete, Villa, John, Salvesen, Tom
and Tjåland, Lars, 1999: “Coiled Tubing
Milling and Temporary Plug and
Abandonment Operations,” SPE 54472,
May 25-26.
120. Sparkman, Gene, 1999: “Drilling the ‘Perfect’

Well,” Hart’s E&P, December.
121. Stagg, Ted, 1997: “Overbalanced, Through

Tubing, Coiled Tubing Drilled Horizontal
Sidetracks in Prudhoe Bay West,” presented
th
at the 1997 9 Annual International
Conference on Horizontal Well Technologies
and Applications, Philip C. Crouse &
Associates, held in Houston, Texas, August
25-27.
122. Stephens, Rodney, 1996: “Update on BPX

(Alaska) CT Drilling,” presented at the
SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, held in
Montgomery, Texas, February 26-28.
123. Streich, Steve; Briggs, Geoffrey; Blacic, Jim;

Schilte, Paul; and Peterson, Carl, 2000:
“Drilling Technology for Mars Research Useful

6. CTD References
for Oil, Gas Industries,” Oil & Gas Journal,

April 24.
124. Strickland, David G. and Smith, Mike, 1997:

“Concentric Workovers Successful in a Well
Recovery Operation,” World Oil, June.
125. Surewaard, J., Rea, T., Azoba, H., van Hoorn,

Saville, P., van Kleef, R., Verwey, P. and
Schoenmakers, J., 1997: “One Year
Experience With Coiled Tubing Drilling,”
SPE/IADC 39260, presented at the 1997
SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology
Conference held in Bahrain, November 23-25.
126. Svendsen, Ø., Vassøy, Skogen, E., Mackin, F.

and Normann, S.H., 1998: “Optimum Fluid
Design for Drilling and Cementing a Well
Drilled with Coil Tubing Technology,” SPE
50405, presented at the 1998 SPE
International Conference on Horizontal Well
Technology held in Calgary, November 1-4.
127. Svoboda, Charles and Murphy, John, 1997:

“Overbalanced Coiled Tubing Drilling with
Rheologically Engineered Drill In Fluids,”
th
presented at the 1997 5 Annual International
Conference on Coiled Tubing Technology,
Philip C. Crouse & Associates, Dallas, Texas,
January 8-10.
128. Terry, Jim, 2000: “New Drilling System Bring

Technology Step Change to Drilling
Operations,” The American Oil & Gas
Reporter, July.
129. Thatcher, Darren A.A., Szutiak, Greg A. and

Lemay, Marc M., 2000: “Integration Driving
New Efficiency, Value in Directional CT UBD,”
American Oil & Gas Reporter, September.
130. Tinkham, Scott K., Meek, Dale E. and Staal,

Timo W., 2000: “Wired BHA Applications in
Underbalanced Coiled Tubing Drilling,”
Orleans, Louisiana, February 23-25.
131. Toler, Scott, 1997: “High Capacity Injector

Head for Large OD CT and Jointed Tubing,”
th
on Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention,
Houston, Texas, February 4-6.
132. Townsend, Steve, Onyia, Ernie and King,

George, 1997: “Evaluation of Through Tubing
Whipstock System to Exit Both 7-in. and 9⅝-
in. Casing Strings Using Coiled Tubing,”
th
on: Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention,
Houston, Texas, February 4-6.
133. Turner, D.R., Harris, T.W.R., Slater, M.,

Yuratich, M.A. and Head, P.F., 1999:
“Electrical Coiled-Tubing Drilling: A Smarter
Drilling System,” a synopsis of SPE 52791,
Journal of Petroleum Technology, October.
134. Turner, Daniel R., Head, Philip F., Yuratich,

Michael A. and Cameron, Gerald, 1999: “The
All Electric BHA: Recent Developments
Toward An Intelligent Coiled-Tubing Drilling
System,” SPE 54469, presented at the 1999
135. Urayama, T.,Yonezawa, T., Hamada, M.,

Sugino, M., Takabe, H. and Ikeda, A., 2000:
“Research and Development of Advanced
Coiled Tubing,” IADC/SPE 59164, presented
held in New Orleans, Louisiana, February 23-
25.
136. Vikane, E., Samsonsen, B. and Lorentzen,

K.E., 1998: “Through Tubing Infill Drilling as a

6. CTD References
Method for Increased Oil Recovery,”

IADC/SPE Drilling Conference held in Dallas,
Texas, March 3-6.
137. Villarroel, Nelson, Almanza, Edgar A., Scott,

Martin, Vera, Isidro, Fernandez, Diego,
Salazar, Arquimedez and Gomez, Luis, 1999:
“Underbalanced Coiled-Tubing-Conveyed
Perforating in a Deviated Well,” a synopsis of
SPE 54509, originally presented at the 1999
SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable,
Houston, Texas, May 25-26, Journal of
Petroleum Technology, July.
138. Walton, Ian C. and Gu, Hongren, 1996:

“Hydraulics Design in Coiled Tubing Drilling,”
SPE 36349, presented at SPE/ICoTA
Roundtable held in Montgomery, Texas,
February 26-28.
139. Weighill, G., Thoreby, H. and Myrholt, L.,

1996: “Underbalanced Coiled Tubing Drilling
Experience on the Ula Field,” SPE 35544,
presented at the European Production
Operations Conference and Exhibition held in
Stavanger, Norway, April 16-17.
140. Weighill, Geoffrey, Thoreby, Helge and

Myrholt, Lars, 1997: “Underbalanced Coiled-
Tubing Drilling Experience on the Ula Field,”
SPE Production & Facilities, May.
141. Wodka, Philip, Tirsgaard, Adamsen, Carsten

J., and Damgaard, Anders P., 1996:
“Underbalanced Coiled-Tubing-Drilled
Horizontal Well in the North Sea,” Journal of
Petroleum Technology, May.

Attachment 1
Example CTD Check Lists
Attachment 1 is a series of example check lists for

planning and executing a CTD project.
Drilling Operations Check List
1) Was a pre-spud meeting held prior to start-up?
2) Are daily briefings held to discuss daily work

program/ problems?
3) Is the drilling program discussed frequently in these

meetings?
4) Are appropriate personnel certified in well-control

training?
5) Is the prescribed method of shutting in the well fully

understood by the appropriate personnel?
6) Have these personnel been instructed/trained in

operating the wellhead/BOP equipment to shut in
the well?
7) Are adequate materials available to increase mud

weight as specified?
8) Do crews communicate at crew change?
9) Is a supervisor present at all crew changes?
10) Are there adequate means of communication

between the CT operator and crew?
11) Are changes to the approved drilling program

communicated to the field personnel in writing?
Safety Meetings/Drills Check List
It is essential that all personnel be aware of the actions to

be taken in an emergency situation.
1) Are weekly safety meetings held and attended by all

personnel at the well site?
2) Are safety “time-out” meetings held prior to all non-

routine operations or tasks?
3) Are safety drills held frequently?
4) Do all personnel understand their respective

roles/duties during emergencies?
A-1 Sound CTD Practices

Written Instructions/Procedures Check List
1) Are written instructions provided in the cabin

concerning diverter drilling or other special
problems?
2) Are written instructions provided daily and “as-

needed” for special operations?
3) Is a detailed BOP test procedure in place?
4) Are written instructions/contingency plans provided

for:
• H2S
• Fire and evacuation
• Major emergency involving underbalanced

drilling
• Emergency killing of well using kill fluids
• Fishing operations
• Pressure deployment
• CT leak/failure
• Wellhead/BOP leak
• Well control
• Severe fluid loss
• Medical emergency
• Drills
• Safety meetings
• Well-site security
• Temporary suspension of operations/leaving

well site
5) Are all of the above instructions discussed in safety

meetings?
6) Are all personnel aware of these instructions and

emergency procedures?
7) Is a plan posted showing escape routes, muster

areas, and individual responsibilities in case of
emergency?
8) Is a copy of the CT Contractor’s Standards of

Operation available at the site?
9) Is a copy of the Well-Control Manual available at the

well site?
10) Are schematics of the wellhead/BOP/downhole

tools maintained in the CT cabin?

Equipment Check List
1) Is the equipment layout/setup safe and efficient?
2) Are all wellhead/BOP components in place, of the

correct pressure rating, and functioning correctly?
3) Are weekly BOP tests conducted? At what

frequency?
4) Are the BOP controls in a safe area? Is a

secondary set required?
5) Is the mud system correctly sized for the well being

drilled?
6) Is all equipment for solids removal correctly sized

and working properly?
7) Is the choke manifold correctly sized and lined up

properly?
8) Is the equipment for making up the BHA being used

properly?
9) Are the necessary gas sensors in place and

functioning?
10) Are these sensors frequently tested and calibrated?
11) Are crews trained and proficient in the use of the

make-up equipment?
12) Has the fatigue life of the CT been checked and

documented?

General Safety Check List
The general safety aspects of a CTD operation have an

impact in four main areas: well security, equipment,
personnel, and the environment.
1) Are hazardous areas clearly marked?
2) Are handrails in place around the rig floor, mud pits

and stairways?
3) Are any hazardous chemicals being used or present

on location?
4) Are adequate instructions/precautions/first aid

provided as per the MSDS sheet for these
chemicals?
5) Is PPE being used as specified?
• Boots
• Hardhats
• Gloves
• Hearing protectors
• Nomex
• Safety glasses
• Other as required
6) Are all ignition sources located in safe zones, or

otherwise rated for the zone it is in?
7) Are first aid kits and eye-wash stations located as

needed?
8) Does layout allow for escape routes from all areas

occupied by personnel?
9) Is medical treatment readily available?
10) Is the overall well-site area neat and conducive to

safe and efficient operations?

Documentation Check List
1) Are all changes to the approved drilling program

documented?
2) Are all written procedures in a readily available file

for review?
3) Is a medical/first-aid log maintained?
4) Are all medical incidents reported and logged?
5) Are all drilling activities being logged on the

prescribed IADC drilling report?
6) Are all well-control incidents recorded and reported?
7) Is there an accurate list of all personnel at the rig

site?
8) Are all relevant operating/technical manuals readily

available at the well site?
9) Has a “look-back/follow-up” been completed with a

review of the overall operation and any major
problems or factors discussed and documented?

Attachment 2
Example CTD Sidetrack Well Summary
Following is an example of some of the data that should

be documented following the CTD operations. This
example uses one form to capture several aspects of the
overall drilling project. The information may be reviewed
quickly and simply, and future references can be
completed efficiently. Supporting data for this information
should be attached and entered into the database as
appropriate.

Attachment 3
Example CTD Wellbore Diagram
A critically important element of the data set following

CTD operations is the updated wellbore diagram. This
diagram (see next page) provides a schematic and
detailed data on the existing wellbore configuration and all
equipment including depths and dimensions in the
wellbore. All pertinent data for use in future workovers or
service work on the well should be included here and
noted. This is one piece of data that is utilized to
determine mechanical integrity the well and feasibility of
future work. The database should include this diagram
and any associated tubing tallies and perforation data.
Accuracy and continual updating of the wellbore diagram
is of the utmost importance for all work being performed
on a well. This is also typically required by the governing
regulatory agency following completion of the well.

Attachment 4
Example CTD BOP Design
The BOP configuration is required data to obtain approval

from the regulatory agency of the CTD project. The BOP
stack should have a pressure rating that is greater than
the maximum anticipated surface pressure (MASP) plus
the maximum expected surface pump pressure to which
the stack will be exposed. MASP, as stated in API RP
5C7, is the highest pressure that may be encountered at
the surface for the given operation. Typically MASP is
calculated by subtracting the hydrostatic pressure exerted
by a column of gas at the TVD of the formation open to
the wellbore from the static bottom-hole pressure (SBHP)
of the formation. The example diagram on the next page
shows a typical BOP that, as required, accommodates the
CT and the BHA/liner to be run.

Coiled Tubing Drilling Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Coiled Tubing Drilling Manual

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Coiled Tubing Drilling Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sound Coiled-Tubing Drilling Practices

(February – August 2001)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Mr. Stephen L. Ward

Mr. Mel Hightower

This report was prepared as an account of work

All applicable federal, state and local governmental rules,

- ii - Sound CTD Practices

We gratefully acknowledge the support and contributions

A significant volume of technical data was contributed to

The authors also appreciate the contributions of John

- iii - Sound CTD Practices

- iv - Sound CTD Practices

4.3.1.8 Downhole Mud Motors ..... 54

Attachment 2: Example CTD Sidetrack Well ...........

Attachment 3: Example CTD Wellbore Diagram A-9

Attachment 4: Example CTD BOP Design ........ A-11

-v- Sound CTD Practices

1.1 ORGANIZATION OF THE MANUAL

This Coiled-Tubing Drilling (CTD) Sound Practices

This manual is organized according to three processes: 1)

I. PRE-JOB PLANNING (Chapters 2 and 3)

The purpose of the pre-job planning process is to interpret

• Clearly define objectives of the CTD job

• Data acquisition and review as well as

• Develop a detailed project scheduling chart

• Initial design of the wellbore along with

• Estimated cost and equipment procurement

• Safe overall operational plan

II. OPERATIONS EXECUTION (Chapter 4)

Safe and successful completion of wellbore drilling

• Data acquisition and quality assurance of data

• A cost-effective wellbore drilled to meet

• Safe overall operation

A comprehensive review of the execution, process, data

-1- Sound CTD Practices

Figure 1. CTD Operation

• An assessment of the CTD operations and

• A review of the data/information for input into

• A review of the results of the well (i.e., were

• More efficient operations on future CTD jobs

• CTD data base for monitoring operational

1.2 BASIC PROCEDURE FOR CTD

As a general rule, these steps should be followed to drill a

1. Clearly define the objectives of the well. Why

2. Review the well history and mechanical

3. Perform feasibility study and identify drilling

4. Design and prepare a preliminary directional

5. Obtain regulatory approval for pre-rig work

6. Begin site preparation review with the CT

7. Review CT equipment needed for the project

8. Determine auxiliary equipment required and

9. Determine required well-control equipment

-2- Sound CTD Practices

10. Review and finalize the directional plan for

11. Choose a drilling fluid based on formation

12. Determine type of window-milling operation

13. Decide if any open-hole logging is required

14. Evaluate need for a liner in the open hole. If