Pan-Africanism and Feminism

Issue 20 | 2015
Feminism and Pan Africanism

Feminist Africa 20
Feminism and
Pan-Africanism
Issue 20: July 2015
First published in 2015 by the

African Gender Institute
All Africa House
University of Cape Town
Private Bag
Rondebosch 7701
© in published edition:
African Gender Institute,
University of Cape Town,
South Africa, 2013
ISSN: 1726-4596
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in

a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording and/or otherwise without permission in
writing from the publisher.
Published with the support of the African Women’s Development Fund.
Typesetting, printing and cover design: COMPRESS.dsl | www.compress.dsl.com
Cover photograph: Women Demanding the Release of Angela Davis from Prison in
Somali capital Xamar (Mogadishu), 1972. Photographer unknown.
Source: http://sinbarras.org/2013/03/12/88/
Distribution: AGI staff
Feminist Africa is a scholarly journal accredited by the

South African Department of Education.
ii | Feminist Africa 20
Editorial policy Editor

Feminist Africa is guided by a profound Amina Mama
commitment to transforming gender hierarchies
in Africa, and seeks to redress injustice and Issue 20 editors
inequality in its content and design, and by Amina Mama
its open-access and continentally-targeted Hakima Abbas
distribution strategy. Feminist Africa targets
gender researchers, students, educators, Reviews editor
women’s organisations and feminist activists Simidele Dosekun
throughout Africa. It works to develop a
feminist intellectual community by promoting Copy editors
and enhancing African women’s intellectual Anne V. Adams
work. To overcome the access and distribution Simidele Dosekun
challenges facing conventional academic
publications, Feminist Africa deploys a dual Proofreader
dissemination strategy, using the Internet Premilla Michelle Chetty
as a key tool for knowledge-sharing and
communication, while making hard copies Editorial team
available to those based at African institutions. Jane Bennett
Two issues are produced per annum, in Selina Mudavanhu
accordance with themes specified in the calls
for contributions. Editorial advisory group
The editorial team can be contacted at The editorial advisory group of Feminist
agi-feministafrica@uct.ac.za Africa consists of scholars and researchers,
located in different fields in the social sciences
Acknowledgements and humanities, who offer their expertise
The Feminist Africa team acknowledges to the development and dissemination of
the intellectual input of the community of Feminist Africa as an innovative African-
African feminist scholars and the Editorial focused journal.
Advisory Board. Advisory group members are:
We thank the African Women’s Akosua Adamako-Ampofo, Bibi Bakare-
Development Fund for their financial support Yusuf, Teresa Barnes, Kum-Kum Bhavnani,
towards production and publication. Hope Chigudu, Tsitsi Dangaremba, Carole
Boyce Davies, Simidele Dosekun, Amanda
Disclaimer Gouws, Pregs Govender, Pumla Dineo
The views expressed by contributors to Gqola, Shireen Hassim, Desiree Lewis, Zine
Feminist Africa are not necessarily those Magubane, Takyiwaa Manuh, Helen Moffett,
of the Editors, Editorial Advisory Board, the Chandra Mohanty, Patricia Mohammed,
African Gender Institute, or our partners. Patricia McFadden, Ruth Ochieng, Margo
While every reasonable effort is made to Okazawa-Rey, Awino Okech, Charmaine
check factual accuracy in published material, Pereira, Jennifer Radloff, Rhoda Reddock,
the contributors are ultimately responsible Vasu Reddy, Kopano Ratele, Ebrima Sall,
for verifying claims made in their writings. Fatou Sow, Chinyere Oparah, Sylvia Tamale,
Neither Feminist Africa nor the African Dzodzi Tsikata, Zenebeworke Tadesse,
Gender Institute will be responsible for errors Muthoni Wanyeki and Paul Zeleza.
or inaccuracies in contributions.
Feminist Africa 20 | iii
Manuscript submissions Distribution

Feminist Africa has a submissions policy Adams Campus Bookshop
determined by its continental focus on University of KwaZulu-Natal
feminist studies and activism. Periodic calls Howard College Campus
for contributions along particular themes Durban, South Africa
guide submissions. All contributions must tel: 27 31 261 2320
register the centrality of feminist politics and fax: 27 31 261 6053
critical gender analysis to past, present and email: campus@adamsbooks.co.za
ongoing processes of social, political and
cultural change in Africa. We regret that we Clarke’s Bookshop
cannot respond to all unsolicited submissions. 211 Long Street
Please submit contributions electronically Cape Town 8001
to agi-feministafrica@uct.ac.za. We regret that South Africa
we do not currently have the capacity to tel: 27 21 423 5739
consider contributions in languages other than fax: 27 21 423 6441
English. email: books@clarkesbooks.co.za
All submissions to Feminist Africa must web: www.clarkesbooks.co.za
use the FA style sheet, and should not
include graphics. International subscriptions
Feature articles should not exceed 6 500 EBSCO Subscription Services
words. Other contributions should not exceed P O Box 749
2 000 words. Cresta 2118
South Africa
Editorial procedure tel: 27 11 678 4416
Contributions submitted to Feminist Africa fax: 27 11 678 4464
are considered by the editorial team. Feature email: mailsa@ebsco.com
articles are peer-reviewed by readers with web: www.ebsco.com/home/southafrica
expertise in relevant areas. Editorial discretion
in relation to submitted work resides with the
editorial team.
Copyright and reproduction

The authors and artists hold individual
copyright. Overall copyright is held by the
African Gender Institute. Material, artwork
extracts and articles from Feminist Africa
may not be reproduced in any form of print or
electronic publication without the permission
of the Editors, who can be contacted at
agi-feministafrica@uct.ac.za. Requests for
permission to reproduce material will not be
granted until one calendar year after first
online publication in Feminist Africa has
lapsed.
Feminist Africa 20 | v
Contents
Editorial: Feminism and Pan-Africanism

– by Amina Mama and Hakima Abbas 1
Features
In Search of the State? Neoliberalism and the labour question
for pan-African feminism
– by Lyn Ossome 6
aking a Difference: Embracing the challenge of women’s

M
substantive engagement in political leadership in Uganda
– by Josephine Ahikire, Peace Musiimenta &
Amon Ashaba Mwiine 23

Between Theory, Activism and Change: A case study of creating
women’s leadership for peace and security in the greater
Horn of Africa
– by Cheryl Hendricks 43
ma Ata Aidoo’s Woman-Centred Pan-Africanism:

A
A reading of selected works
– by Delia Kumavie 57
Archives and Collective Memories: Searching for African

women in the pan-African imaginary
– by Brenda Nyandiko Sanya and Anne Namatsi Lutomia 69
Standpoint
hen Exploitation is Camouflaged as Women Empowerment:
W
The case of Joyce Banda as presidential running mate and
vice president in Malawi
– by Juliet Kamwendo & Gregory Kamwendo 77
vi | Feminist Africa 20
In Conversation
eaving Pan-Africanism at the Scene of Gathering
W
The Weaving Kenya Women’s Collective 83
Reviews
eminism, Empowerment and Development:
F
Changing Women’s Lives
– by Sehin Teferra 101
Migrant Women of Johannesburg: Everyday Life

in an In-between City
– by Kerubo Abuya 105
In Idi Amin’s Shadow: Women, Gender and Militarism

in Uganda
– by Gabeba Baderoon 109
oncerning Violence: Nine Scenes from the Anti-Imperialistic

C
Self-Defense
– by Luam Kidane 116
he Art of Ama Ata Aidoo

T
– by Helen Yitah 123
Claim No Easy Victories: The Legacy of Amílcar Cabral

– by Claudia Gastrow 127
Contributors 132
Editorial | 1
Editorial: Feminism and Pan-Africanism

Amina Mama and Hakima Abbas
This 20th issue of FA sets out to continue documenting and reflecting

on feminist contributions to pan-Africanism, and the implications of
pan-Africanism for feminism in Africa. Issue 19 indicated the variety of
discourses and contributions of feminists in pan-Africanism. In this issue,
our contributors explore just some of the ways in which neoliberalism and
neo-colonialism have distorted and obscured feminist articulations of the
pan-Africanism dream. While the previous issue clearly underlined the role
and contribution of women in the pan-African intellectual and activist
project (see Rhoda Reddock, Carole Boyce-Davis features in FA19), it became
clear that post-colonial engagement on the continent comes out of a very
different set of conditions. Today the continental mainstream pan-African
agenda is dominated by powerful men who are mostly concerned about using
conservative pan-African rhetoric to the service of their often anti-democratic
purposes. The varied grassroots pan-African movements of the past have
been reduced into a hegemonic pan-Africanism narrative that has become an
institutionalised support for patriarchal values. Though the Organisation of
African Unity transformed itself into the African Union in 2001, the institution
remains dominated by the old boy’s club of Presidents who utilise oppressive
political cultures to remain in office beyond their constitutional terms, despite
the mass resistance that we have witnessed this year in Burundi. Other leaders
are engaged in conflicts that make a mockery of grassroots pan-African
ideals dedicated to a liberated continent. The new hegemonic meanings of
‘Africa’ are being articulated by presidents from Mbeki to Mugabe who at
times poetically expound on the renaissance of an African dream for freedom
and at other times disfigure the transnational anti-imperialist thrust of pan-
Africanism in order to entrench localised authoritarian rule, buttressing this
2 | Feminist Africa 20
with nationalist, patriarchal, anti-feminist rhetoric that all too many of us

remain gullible to.
Addis Ababa, the headquarters of the African Union, is home to
something very different from the diasporan and early nationalist visions of
the confederated state (advocated by Diop and Nkrumah), or the ancestral
homeland that the Garveyites had hoped to return to, and no less different
from the revolutionary society pursued by more radical, anti-capitalist
movements in Guinea-Bissau, Algeria, and Southern Africa. Instead, we
have a modern state-styled bureaucratic political structure. The architecture
accompanying the African Union is grandiose, in keeping with the presidential
culture that prevails. Perhaps in keeping with the economic malaise that
has dogged African development, the building itself was fully paid for and
constructed by the Chinese. It rises above the dusty impoverished streets of
Addis, a cenotaph to the dreams of those who died for Africa’s liberation. For
the local inhabitants of Addis it is a nightmare of securitisation, with regular
mass removals several times a year, whenever Africa’s presidents are due to
meet. With its walls adorned with portraits of male leaders, one could be
forgiven for seeing the present-day incarnations of pan-Africanism as an elite
men-only affair. Critics observe that, despite the efforts of the first woman
Chairperson to create more civil society forums, by and large the OAU/AU
still operates as if working class people never lived or died for freedom, never
served the revolutionary pan-African cause of the liberation of all Africa’s
peoples from oppression, exploitation and marginalisation, both in their own
nations, and in the world.
Beyond the AU, which, like the UN is constrained by its member states,
African movements across the continent have their own visions, and interests
for continental unity and solidarity. Even back in the era when the national
liberation movements dominated, the transnational pan-African Women’s
Organisation (PAWO) advocated for women’s liberation through a continental
lens. PAWO worked alongside male-dominated nationalist movements,
which women of that generation contributed to with numerous courageous
actions, and often-times with their lives. This reality is a powerful fact of
African history. Without the research and documentation work done by
feminist activists and researchers this knowledge might well have been lost
to us. Though the coverage of feminist struggles within academic circles has
expanded due to a larger feminist presence in higher education and research,
Editorial | 3
challenges still remain. Pan-African discourses without class and gender

analyses have limited, if any, relevance to women. It should be our goal
to pursue political possibilities that would be opened up by revolutionary
feminist pan-African discourses that work in the service and interests of
African people across borders and language zones.
In this issue, disparate continental relationships to pan-Africanism are
explored through considerations of neoliberal economics and their negative
impact on the possibilities for a feminist pan-Africanism (Lyn Ossome),
examples of transnational efforts to bring about changes in political leadership
and peace-building (Cheryl Hendricks), and the creative work of feminist pan-
Africanist writer, Ama Ata Aidoo (Delia Kumavi). We regret that our efforts
to secure contributions from French-speaking feminists were not successful.1
Ahikire, Musiimenta and Mwiine’s article ‘Making a Difference’ shares the
findings of research commissioned by ISIS-WICCE to investigate the challenges
of moving beyond mere inclusion of women in political institutions. The
Ugandan case study was carried out as part of a pan-African action, research
and institution-building project currently being orchestrated by ISIS–WICCE,
itself a transnational organisation that has worked across the continent’s war
zones for decades, and which sees the need to work towards a new political
culture (FA 10 carried an interview with Ruth Ochieng, Executive Director,
ISIS-WICCE). Africa remains marginalised and hampered by destructive
conflicts that continue to be misrepresented and poorly understood. Luam
Kidane provides an acerbic review of Goran Hugo Olsson’s much-acclaimed-
in-the-West documentary, taking issue with the persistent distortions, of both
African realities, as well as the work of revolutionaries like Frantz Fanon. Also
on the cultural front, Delia Kumavie’s feature discusses key aspects of Ama
Ata’s work as a pan-African feminist writer, while Helen Yitah reviews Yaba
Badoe’s latest documentary ‘The Art of Ama Ata Aidoo’ (2014). Three years in
the making, due to the travails of procuring funding for African film-makers,
the film owes its completion to the community of supporters who responded
to with a crowd-sourcing initiative, raising almost 50% of the funding. This,
in conjunction with the support of the African Women’s Development Fund,
enabled the completion of this project.2
One thing that is clear is that throughout the history of women’s cultural
production and organising, women’s ideas and movements express principles
of continental unity and solidarity across colonial borders. The challenges of
continental organising have always been significant, particularly in relation

to external actors. So for example, when it comes to resources, donors still
prefer to channel resources along colonial borders. It seems that for all the
‘grassroots’ rhetoric, such agencies remain curiously reluctant to accept that
colonially inscribed borders do not define African people – least of all the vast
majority of who have no passports. African civilisations were not constrained
by the borders of colonial, now post-colonial, states, nor was the radical pan-
Africanism evident in those liberation movements that challenged subjection
to the global expansion that was required to sustain Western capitalism, as
Walter Rodney and many others have demonstrated. Unfortunately, even
Africa’s more revolutionary movements were to lapse into patriarchal state-
centred politics and economic policies that ensured that national liberation
did not mean liberation for women, or victory for pan-Africanist visions of
a liberated Africa. Pan-African feminist movements have emerged since flag
independence, as women have risen to the challenge of engaging in a whole
new struggle, not merely to secure better political representation, but further
– to challenge multi-facetted cultural and material oppressions based on
gender and sexuality.
The long-term commitment of feminists in Africa to transnational
organising predates the recent iterations of ‘transnational feminism’ in
Western discourses, and has been further underlined during the last decade.
The African Feminist Forum has mounted a series of remarkable continent-
wide convenings that invoke pan-African traditions to promote solidarities
and shared agendas (see Jessica Horn’s review in FA 11). AAWORD/AFARD has
been revitalised with a new generation taking up the leadership. FEMNET,
ISIS-WICCE, ABANTU for Development and AAWORD/AFARD are among
transnational African networks that continue to actively pressurise continental
governance forward on questions of gender equality, carrying out training,
policy advocacy, documentation, publication and other activities.
The persistence of material and cultural gender-oppression and injustice
has generated post-colonial movements of women across the political
spectrum. Liberal and neoliberal women seek representation through entry
into the existing structures of power and leadership. Others apply critical
analysis to demystify the patriarchal structures and cultures which have often
failed women. On the basis of systemic analysis, radical feminists pursue
transformative gender politics, often by organising autonomously and beyond
Editorial | 5
state structures to challenge war, poverty, lack of basic rights and injustices.
In sum, feminists in Africa share a regional experience of the incompleteness
of the struggle for African liberation. We see the inter-connections between
multiple oppressions, and are set to continue pursuing freedom in the firm
belief that a just and humane order – another world – is possible. The struggle
continues.
Endnotes
1. French, as colonial a language as English is only one challenge. What of the
many indigenous languages omitted by scholars and writers, which only Ngugi
wa Thiongo has been able to accomplish? The fact is that multilingualism
requires another level of resources, and the means to address differences that
are not merely linguistic, but also of philosophical and intellectual traditions. It
requires the voluntary labour of our French-speaking sisters, our Arabic and our
Portuguese sisters. We reiterate our open invitation, and call for the mobilisation
this will take to implement.
2. Full disclosure: Amina worked with Yaba Badoe on this film, making it the
second of two collaborative film projects, the first of which was ‘The Witches of
Gambaga’, discussed and reviewed in FA 16 (www.witchesofgambaga.com)
In Search of the State?

Neoliberalism and the labour question
for pan-African feminism
Lyn Ossome
Introduction
Since the 1970s, informal work has expanded and appeared in new guises
in the context of globalisation, neo-liberalism and migration, all of which
are highly gendered processes (Chen et al. 2004; ILO 2002b, 2007a). An as
yet unsettled question posed within feminist debates is whether women’s
increased participation in informal economic activity contributes to their
empowerment or their impoverishment (Meagher 2010). While economists
have tended to see the informal economy as a source of economic opportunity
for women in a sphere free of the gender-biased regulations of the formal
economy (USAID 2005), more critical feminist and political-economy analyses
have argued that the informal economy represents a poverty trap for women,
concentrating them in low-skill, low-income activities with little prospect
of advancement (Chant and Pedwell 2008; Chen et al 2006; Sassen 2002).
Recent ILO research on gender and informal economies, and gender studies
of global value chains offer gender analyses of wider global economic change
processes, paying attention to informal labour markets, global commodity
chains and transnational livelihood networks (Barrientos et al. 2003; Sassen
2002). These studies show that global and national economic changes have
not limited women’s entry into labour markets, but rather incorporate them
on unfavorable terms. Women are pushed into temporary and vulnerable
employment within the informal economy, and excluded from more lucrative
opportunities opened up by globalisation and liberalisation (Meagher 2010).
Prior to the economic liberalisation policies of the 1980s, the informal
sector was often seen in terms of the failure of the formal sector to absorb
surplus labour (Tsikata 2009). In the 1970s informal activities were regarded
as disengagement from the state, a perspective that highlighted the resilience
Feature article | 7
and autonomy of traders, and their collective impact as non-state economic

actors. This literature addressed the state’s withdrawal from economic
processes under economic liberalisation (Tsikata 2009; Lourenco-Lindell
2004). In this context growing the formal economy was viewed as a solution
to exploitative labour relations observed within the informal economy, and the
means through which economic growth and development could occur (Mhone
1996). For decades, many African governments deployed punitive control
measures in efforts to discipline the informal sector. However, governments’
compliance with neoliberal reforms kept the informal economy expanding, as
more and more of the labour force was retrenched from the formal economy.
Additionally, the punitive measures and abuse of human rights within the
informal economy gave rise to various social movements advocating for
informal workers’ rights, some of which ended up institutionalising themselves
as organisations advocating for informal workers. The decent work campaign
popularised by the ILO and transnational organisations, and the opening up
of political space in Africa also facilitated informalisation (Mitullah 2010;
Olukoshi and Wohlgemuth 1995).
Since the mid 1980s, research and policy have turned towards the
informalisation of employment relations. Informalisation has been discussed
in the literature as: i) the growth in size of the informal economy which has
accompanied the reduction in the size of the formal economy; ii) the systematic
changes in labour relations from formalised to more informal arrangements
(Tsikata 2009; Chen et al. 2006; Beneria 2001; Sethuraman 1998); and iii) a
feature of contemporary economic growth and the global economy (Chen et
al. 2006; ILO 2002). While this phenomenon has deep historical roots in many
Southern settings (Lindell 2010), the era of economic liberalisation has seen
informalisation take on increasingly gendered manifestations.
Drawing from this general context, this paper aims to highlight some of
the challenges that labour informalisation poses for feminist politics in Africa.
Drawing on feminist political economy, I argue that labour informalisation
in the context of neoliberalism poses particular challenges for pan-African
feminist emancipatory politics. The paper comprises three parts: the first
broadly outlines a policy and discursive framework within which the informal
economy in Africa may be understood; the second reviews feminist critiques
of labour informalisation in Africa, outlining various feminist demands
from a pan-Africanist perspective; the third focuses on the social, cultural
and political constraints which neoliberalism places upon states – critically

locating the informalisation of women’s labour in Africa within pan-African
feminist debates.
Policy context
Economic policy discussions on informal economy have proceeded within
two broad discursive frames: a market-centered discourse, rigidly centered
on the needs and interests of the market; and a market-decentred discourse
interjected by strong counter-discourses that become visible in moments
where the contradictions of capitalism are manifested (Macharia 2007). State
functionaries in Africa will more often than not articulate neoliberal discourse
that is impervious to counter-discourses, resulting in market-centered policies.
When successful critical discourses draw state and public attention to
concerns of informal labour and generate policies to mitigate market forces
(Ibid: 205). Feminist discourses, by focusing on the rights of women workers,
add an additional dimension. Drawing from Macharia (2007) and others, I will
discuss these three co-existent discourses.
The globally hegemonic neoliberal discourse dominates African economic
policies. Propagated by the Bretton Woods bi- and multi-lateral lending
institutions, it is based on the belief that the market is neutral and fair
(Macharia 2007). Harvey (2005) critically defines neoliberal ideology as
a mask for practices designed to maintain, reconstitute and restore elite
class power. Beneria & Roldán’s (1987) treatment of class as a ‘function of
gender’ adds an important dimension. Read together, these critiques suggest
an understanding of neoliberal ideology as obscuring practices that serve
to entrench inequalities based on both gender and class, both oppressions
being mutually constitutive (Macharia 2007: 214). The neoliberal discourse
on the informal economy is centered on capital, identifying the constraints
to creating capital and proposing ways in which pro profit-making conditions
may be established, as evident in the World Bank’s World Development
Report (2005). The Bank identifies the challenges facing microentrepreneurs
as including insecure property rights, corruption, policy unpredictability and
limited access to finance and public services (WDR, 2005). More specifically the
Bank argues that red tape in business registration hampers access to financing
and creates distortions (WDR, 2005). This discourse valorises entrepreneurship
and micro-enterprises despite the evidence that such activities are precarious
Feature article | 9
and yield meagre incomes. Solutions offered to enhance the profitability of

‘microenterprises’ are therefore based on correcting purported distortions
(Macharia 2007: 215-6). While in recent times the Bank has sought to
demonstrate an awareness of some of the limitations of neoliberal economic
policy, its ultimate interest nevertheless remains in the creation of a ‘better
investment climate’ and in capital generation through taxation (Ibid: 217). A
significant critique is put forward by heterodox development economists who
underscore the fact that economic growth and poverty alleviation cannot
be positively correlated. In fact, studies from across the Global South show
growth in country indicators of economic performance, correlating with
massive increases in self-employment, informalisation and casualisation of
work, and accompanied by rising poverty and a fall in real wages, particularly
for women workers.1
Within the labour rights discourse, the International Labour Organization’s
(ILO) approach to informality is concerned with ‘risks to labour’ (Macharia
2007: 225). While the neoliberal position necessitates a laissez-faire capitalism
with minimal state intervention in the market, the labour rights position calls
for protection and insurance of workers. The ILO defines policy issues in terms
of ‘risk’ (see Chen et al, 2001; see also Cohen et al. 2000), that is, general risks
stemming from illness, property loss, disability, etc., and work-related risks
such as little assurance or guarantee of work, low wages, few worker benefits,
unsafe/unhealthy work conditions, insufficient market information, skills,
access to existing/emerging market opportunities and career opportunities.
The recommendation subsequently is a shift in macroeconomic policies
(structures of aggregate demand, prices of inputs and outputs, incentives and
subsidies) to favour ‘informal’ units, operations and products, ‘a pragmatic
approach to labour legislation balancing concerns for health, safety and
security of workers and the broader community with concerns for the financial
viability of ‘informal’ enterprises’ (Chen et al, 2001, 2006).
Labour rights discourse at times broadens beyond ILO’s risk categories to
encompass all issues of concern to workers, highlighting particularly the right
of street vendors to unionise and make demands on the state (Macharia 2007:
226). While the ‘labour rights’ discourse is instrumental in promoting worker
interests, particularly for those workers operating within collectives, it is
important to consider the relevance of the idea of unions in discussions about
‘informal’ workers. Labour rights discourse generally addresses unionised
formal sector workers, in employer-employee relationships, and already the

subject of international advocacy (Ibid). Self-employed workers are generally
not organised, or covered by conventional unions. In addition, conventional
unions in Africa have declining membership due to the contraction of formal
jobs and inverse expansion of the informal economy. This has implications
for the political vibrancy of unions and their ability to successfully bargain
on behalf of members. And despite the potential for political action, the
unionisation of ‘informal’ workers is difficult, as theory and empirical evidence
demonstrate (Ibid). Further, the collectives of workers in more lucrative
and male-dominated informal occupations are relatively visible, and have
dominated state-convened policy deliberations when compared to street
vendors’ collectives. Even street vendor collectives are predominantly male-led
and tend to focus on the interests of their male membership. Unionisation
that fails to recognise and respond to gender power disparities serve to
accentuate inequalities, further marginalising those who are already poorer
and less powerful (Macharia 2007: 227).
The feminist discourse on informal work draws attention to issues of
concern to women and marginalised groups that arise from inequitable
gender power relations at home as well as the workplace (Macharia 2007).
For instance it addresses how the lack of recognition and compensation for
care work has worked to reproduce gender power hierarchies at the household
level (Beneria, 1979), as well as how the replication of domestic labour
relations in the workplace disempowers women. Women are concerned about
how social-reproductive tasks will be fulfilled when they are absent from the
home. Providing materially for children becomes a pre-occupation for women
vendors given that almost 50% of them are single, divorced or widowed
and have no supplementary support (Macharia 2007). At the workplace,
gender-based harassment and discriminatory treatment also become concerns
for women workers (Ibid). Homeless market traders and street vendors, the
majority of whom are women, also face challenges of personal security and
are vulnerable to physical and sexual violence and robberies in the markets
and streets at night (Tsikata 2009a; Macharia 2007). Other determinants of
harassment and/or discrimination include age, physical ability and citizenship
(Macharia 2007), as well as caste, ethnicity, region, training and occupation.
Yet feminist discourse encounters strong opposition and is often ignored
in the rigidly patriarchal policy-making environment on which capitalism is
Feature article | 11
structured, and subsumed in mainstream labour rights discourse. A significant

body of critical feminist theorisations on the informal economy has articulated
elements of the feminist discourse on informal work, and useful positions
have emerged out of these critiques which highlight women’s complex
structural positions that defy normative policy prescriptions towards tackling
informalisation.
Feminist perspectives on African labour informalisation

Feminist analyses of the trend towards greater informalisation of women’s
work have shed significant light on the gendered impacts of liberalisation,
while generating some specific challenges. By the mid-1980s, as a result of
economic growth, the creation of new areas of work and gender-equity policies,
many more women entered the labour force around the world (Sethuraman
1998, in Tsikata 2009b). While some entered professions and management
jobs in the formal sector, mainly in public service, they were in the minority.
The majority of women were self-employed or in waged work in the informal
economy. In some African countries, export processing zones (EPZs) also
utilised female labour. The increase in women’s labour force participation,
however, has not yielded any increases in women’s earnings (Ibid). While some
scholars have suggested that increases in women’s labour force participation
results from better education opportunities (Klasen and Woolard 2000), the
fact is that there have also been significant increases among women with
little or no schooling. Citing other factors in the case of South Africa, Casale
(2004) suggests that the increase in female headship of households and the
erosion of male income support help explain the significant rise in female
labour force participation, arguing that women’s labour force participation
has thus responded to increases in household joblessness (Casale 2003), a
likely response to long-term structural unemployment.
On-going agrarian dispossession in many African countries has placed
significant strain on women’s productive and reproductive labour, pushing
millions of women into tenuous, informal, low-status and low-paying work.
Problematising the agrarian situation, Tsikata (2009a) has argued that land
tenure and labour have often been discussed separately, resulting in two
insufficiently connected bodies of literature which offer useful but partial
insights into the implications of gender inequalities in labour relations
and resource tenures for women’s livelihoods. This disarticulation between
tenure and labour might suggest a hidden gender component in land tenure
reform that is characteristic of the feminisation of labour. Stated differently,
de-peasantisation does not guarantee proletarianisation or meeting the
costs of social reproduction via the labour market due to increasing labour
flexibilisation and ‘jobless growth’. Indeed, studies in many African countries
suggest that women’s increased labour force participation is unlikely to be
associated with increased mobility in the labour market (Casale and Posel
2002) or with growth in industry – but rather are more to do with the reality
of jobless growth. As Razavi (2007, citing Byres [2003]) too observes,
Industrial growth, which has historically been the sine qua non of
massive poverty reduction by absorbing the labour force that is released
from agriculture, has remained anaemic in recent decades in developing
countries, with the exception of East Asia. Indeed, one of the remarkable
features of structural change in contemporary developing countries has
been the disproportionate shift of the labour force from agriculture to
‘services’ (rather than to industry), which is ominous, as much of this can
be thinly disguised survival strategies indicative of a desperate effort to
turn to anything that might be available (which happens to fall into the
‘services’ rubric) (Razavi 2007: 1484).
Further critiques, recognising women’s precarity within the informal economy,
also note the limitations of measures which target women for poverty
reduction. From the 1990s, the World Bank placed considerable emphasis on
the notion of ‘poverty reduction’, which in many African countries, translated
into poverty reduction strategies that emphasised the importance of the
informal sector for employment creation and economic recovery. Gender-
awareness in WB strategies, now finally taking note of women’s overwhelming
representation within the informal economy, meant targeting rural women
and women-headed households, as vehicles for poverty reduction. Yet,
as O’Laughlin (1997) argues, the poverty focus reflects acceptance of the
terms of structural adjustment programmes under which the state should
programmatically seek to reduce its role in social provisioning to address only
the poorest of the poor. These are defined as the structurally impoverished
– those who cannot enter the market under favourable terms – women,
children, the old and the invalid. The literature on women-headed households
has been taken up in World Bank-sponsored studies on the social dimensions
of adjustment. The institutionalisation of poverty-reduction programmes
raises the question of whether the focus on assistance to women-headed

households, to reach the destitute, all the destitute, and only the destitute,
locates the debate on women-headed households in Africa within a much
broader ideological discussion (O’Laughlin 1997).
Furthermore, as Moore (1994: 26) has pointed out, global patterns of
accumulation have meant high levels of unemployment for unskilled workers,
a corresponding decline of the male breadwinner role, and discrimination
against women both in the labour market and in the organisation of public
transfers. Moore poignantly argues that the contemporary debate around
the family is really addressing and reshaping people’s conceptions of the
appropriate roles for the state, the market, public institutions and the family
in social provisioning. Structural exclusion from stable, unionised, wage
employment of many rural people – women and men, young and old – is
not exclusion from the market per se. Rural livelihoods are based on patterns
of consumption that imply both regular wage income and rural production.
The programmatic neoliberalism of international financial institutions
denies the state the right to challenge global structures of accumulation
and relegates to the family responsibility for dealing with their economic
and social consequences. These arguments suggest the critical importance
of extricating the debate on poverty and women-headed households in
Africa from neo-liberal discourse and its generic policy recommendations on
targeting and market-led growth. Both rural poverty and the high incidence of
women-headed households derive from exclusionary and polarising structures
of accumulation (Moore 1994: 1-2). A more useful analysis would be to
understand the ways in which rural communities more broadly, change under
neoliberal restructuring of labour. As such, O’Laughlin (1997) argues, we need
to ask not who to target, but rather, what should be done when capital no
longer needs the labour that is pulled from rural households over so many
generations (1997: 1).
Feminist critiques also highlight the complex terrain of gender exploitation,
and the contradictory impacts of neolilberalism on women. On the one hand,
globalisation subjects more women to increasing domination and devalorisation
by capital; on the other hand, women often respond to globalisation in
interesting ways. Informal jobs can be utilised to craft economic emancipation
from patriarchy at home. On the other hand, it is also clear that the women’s
informal labor does not dismantle androcentric, neoliberal capitalism, but rather
co-opts women (Chatterjee 2012). Still other feminist scholars argue that the
equation of “globalisation” with its current neoliberal incarnation discourages
attempts to envision alternatives (Jaggar 2001).
This latter question is in my view, a critical one, as it interrogates the
possibility of achieving (gender) justice within the capitalist system. The
question posed is how to challenge the super-exploitation of women’s
informalised labour without destroying the informal networks of solidarity
and exchange through which African women have responded to their
marginalisation under capitalism.2 This is much more than survivalism. African
women consciously labour out of necessity, but also out of a sense of shared
struggle to provide for their communities, undertaken through centuries of
dispossesion under slavery, colonialism, and under contemporary neoliberal
capitalism. Neoliberalism redefines the ways in which we understand these
forms of labour – devaluing and appropriating women’s associational life for
exploitative ends. For history tells us that under colonialism in various African
contexts, what might have been considered as women’s informal work in fact
comprised of elaborate “life-centered social relations” that included trade
and self-help networks among women’s groups and links between women’s
groups and other community, church and labour organisations (Brownhill
2009: 206).
The policy challenge here relates as much to quantifying as to
remunerating women’s unpaid, informalised labour.3 This point also highlights
a major concern regarding the conceptualisation of informal labour: that
is, the overwhelming tendency in the literature to view women’s informal
sector activities as requiring formal recognition and legislation in order to
provide more of the benefits of the formal economy. Since the informal sector
has been growing in recent decades in Africa, this suggests that there is a
potential trade-off between job creation and employment conditions. This,
it is argued, is a particular challenge for policymakers who strive on the one
hand to promote economic growth and job creation, and at the same time
improve the situation of workers in Africa. This challenge raises a number of
questions: should African governments aim to integrate the informal sector
into the formal economy in order to extend benefits to this sector, even
though this may hamper growth and job creation? Or should they instead
focus on deregulating the formal sector to remove the barriers to workers and
enterprises from participating in the formal segment of the economy? (Verick
2006: 4). The language of ‘growth’ and ‘entrepreneurship’ as a means of

lifting African women out of poverty remains as unconvincing now as it was
more than three decades ago when African states began to impose the will of
an unjust neoliberal doctrine upon their peoples.
The political and policy implications of such thinking are stark when one
considers the immense pressure placed upon African governments under
structural adjustments and neoliberal governance regimes. At present, one
of the foremost demands of neoliberal capitalism is its preoccupation with
legal formalism, which not only undermines associations and labour practices
not formally recognised by the law, but ensures that ‘legality’ determines
who enters the market and what, more or less overtly, the market itself has
come to signify – the very basis of citizenship claims: in Mama’s (2013)
words, the privileging of “markets over governments”. This is part of the
ideological assault of neoliberalism: the fact that it is through the market
(commodification of labour) that individuals become legible to the state as
citizens. The state – through its laws – on the one hand acts as the mediator
of capital, and on the other, still stands as guarantor of the rights and liberties
of its people. This is a contradiction that essentially pits the capitalist state
against itself. Upon what basis therefore, do pan-African feminists set out
to challenge the exploitative norms of labour informalisation given that it is
through the (capitalist) state that the disenfranchising effects of neoliberalism
have ‘trickled down’ to the people? What is the basis of expecting the
capitalist state to formalise women’s labour rights in the interests of women?
It is this and other questions that I briefly explore below in a discussion of the
policy thrust of African states under neoliberalism.
Pan-Africanism and neoliberal constraints on state responses

to informalisation
Recent years have been marked by a proliferation of studies on neoliberalism,
but in spite of its diversity, most of this research discusses its import for
the state. Some authors suggest that neoliberalism is characterised by the
reduction of the state (Prasad 2006; Haque 2008), whereas others argue that
neoliberalism is characterised by the redeployment of the state (Ong 2006;
Bayart 2007; Lee and McBride 2007). Some authors present neoliberalism
as the decay of an inflexible state, or as the inexorable advance of its right
hand, but it is clear that the impact cannot be understood ahistorically, or
acontextually. This in itself requires thinking beyond a Western-centred global

view of neoliberal expansion, to consider its variations in diverse African
contexts. Two phases of implementation can be distinguished: the first, begun
in the 1980s, consisted of adjustment policies that focus on the economy; the
second, started in the 1990s, was marked by political adjustments in favour
of democratic processes that were supposed to move beyond the failures of
structural adjustment programmes of the previous decade (Hilger 2012).
According to the World Bank, neoliberalism requires a ‘strong state’ (World
Bank, quoted in Harrison 2010: 41) because the state is an essential prerequisite
to a space of pure competition. Competition requires that the state be properly
positioned to correct the natural phenomena that hamper competition (e.g.
the creation of monopolies, or price instability). According to the WB, the
legitimacy of the state depends on economic growth; economic growth is
in turn determined by the ability of the state to shape a framework within
which individuals are free to pursue their individual interests, and in a world
of competition this should strenghten the state. Competition and maximisation
become the organising principles of the state (Hilger 2012). Following this
thinking, the neoliberal restructuring undertaken in Africa by the Bretton Woods
institutions from the 1980s was massive and unprecedented. Most countries
became testing grounds for radical neoliberal policies, and in the 1980s alone,
38 African governments accepted 244 conditional loans from the World Bank
and the IMF (Bratton and van de Walle 1997: 132-3); 10 years later, the IMF
was still operating in 36 countries (van de Walle 2001: 7).
Neoliberalism’s particular (and ongoing) impacts on the continent have
been weighty. In many countries, the second wave of neoliberal policies
(political liberalisation) imposed by international institutions reinforced the
paradox of a state that is both omnipresent and completely absent (Hilger
2012). The state is both more present and visible, but at the same time, more
absent and weak, capable of coercion (violence, threats, and intimidation)
but incapable of fulfilling its social obligations. The state thereby shows itself
to be not an apparatus but a set of processes that are not always linked
to institutions, or that, in any case, cannot be reduced to these (Ibid). The
changed nature of the state under neoliberalism has had varied and complex
manifestations in different contexts in Africa.
Neoliberalism’s impacts bear particular implications for the pan-Africanist
cultural and political movement, historically concerned with reconstructing
and explaining global relationships from the perspective of Africans. At its

inception, pan-Africanism was tied to strong intellectual, labour and other
social movements, e.g. student movements, revolutionary movements and
literary movements, all of which made pan-Africanism a central thesis in their
advocacy (Maoulidi 2009). Neoliberalism’s effects have been felt across these
movements, and of particular concern in this paper are the alienating features.
These have weakened labour movements by disarticulating economic from
political questions, and concealing women’s structural positions. I turn below
to a discussion of specific challenges which neoliberalism poses for states with
regards to the labour question, emphasising particular feminist concerns that
articulate a pan-Africanist vision.
Firstly, scholarship has shed light on the ways in which neoliberalism has
imposed itself as a technology of governance over and above ideology, as
the most efficient and rational and pragmatic means of finding solutions
to problems (Ferguson 1990). The hegemonic technocratic vocabulary of
‘good governance’ is articulated on the basis of axioms posed as scientific
truth. ‘Scientific’ capitalism presents itself as the only possible path toward
supposedly non-ideological, rational and depoliticised solutions to political
situations. Such depoliticisation has contributed in Africa, as elsewhere, to an
abandonment of the political dimensions of political and economic debates
in favour of a narrow, technicist vocabulary (Ferguson 1990). Recall here,
Cabral’s (1973) argument that,
The value of culture as an element of resistance to foreign domination
lies in the fact that culture is the vigorous manifestation on the
ideological or idealist plane of the physical and historical reality of the
society that is dominated or to be dominated...Like history, or because
it is history, culture has as its material base the level of the productive
forces and the mode of production (1973: 42).
The depoliticisation that has come about under neoliberalism, I argue,
conceals the multiple dimensions of dispossession under capitalism. On one
level are the various manifestations of cultural imperialism – the economic,
technological and cultural hegemony that industrialised nations sustain
at a global level – whose impacts negatively affect African women in
particular. The ideology of technological imperialism, for instance, justifies
the subjugation of nature, the unscrupulous exploitation of natural resources
on the continent, and the erosion of the natural commons on which many
rural livelihoods still depend. Historical accounts of colonialism in countries

such as Kenya have shown how the modes of resistance expressed by women
were shaped by women’s struggles to retain their productive and reproductive
autonomy within the male-defined systems of kinship, production and
administration (Brownhill 2009). These acts of resistance, which could be
defined as political, were gradually eroded through colonialists’ control and
suppression of African communal and subsistence practices. Neoliberalism
has continued this immiseration, and from a feminist perspective, its most
significant impact lies in the political claims it silences. The paradoxical
nature of political liberalisation under neoliberalism is that the set of rights
ascribed to women are almost absolutely negated by the economic scarcity
and dispossession reproduced under neoliberalism.
Secondly, political decentralisation has often been accompanied by land
development and redistribution projects that have strengthened notions of
private property and discourses around autochthony (Geschiere 2009). The
ability to point to one’s autochthonous roots is to assure oneself greater
access to economic and social resources (Hilgers 2011b). Discrimination
of individuals based on their ‘original’ belonging has occassionally been
codified in the law, as in Ivory Coast and Cameroon, and found violent
expression among dispossesed ‘indigenous’ groups, as in South Africa.
Autochthony constitutes a mode of categorisation that historically enabled
the identification and administration of populations. Even when it has not
been officially incorporated into the law, such discrimination has had a major
impact on social relations among citizens and between citizens and state
in numerous countries (Hilgers 2012). These impacts extend in material yet
invisibilised ways to African women’s mobility across borders – mobility which
is antagonised by African states bent on enforcing the stringent colonial
boundaries which they inherited. The late General Secretary of the Pan-African
Movement, Tajudeen Abdul-Raheem, often remarked on this point, observing
that no one on the continent embodied the spirit of pan-Africanism as much
as African women traders who on a daily basis can be seen crossing invisible
borders between states on foot, buying goods on one side, selling them on the
other and so on. The point he sought to emphasise was the organic, informal
labour forms that remain invisible to policy, and are as such, antagonised by
policy. The subalternity he sought to highlight defies any notion of ‘migrant-
as-subaltern’ (Dhawan 2007) – as it rather embodies own-account workers
operating outside of organised collectives and not covered under conventional

‘labour rights’. States’ enforcement of territorial policies in such cases function
to demobilise labour. As such, in reflecting on what it means for [women]
to turn to the state for emancipation, Brown poses the following questions:
How does the nature of the political state transform one’s social identity
when one turns to the state for political resolution of one’s subordination,
exclusion, or suffering? What kind of subject is being held out to the state
for what kind of redress or redemption (1995: 101)? Even as African feminists
turn to the (neoliberal) state in search of answers to these labour questions,
and wage a Left-inclined struggle, are we able to account for the illegible of
women – critical for mediating gender-progressive politics and sustaining a
transformative engagement with the state?
Thirdly, and related to the above point is scholarship documenting the
neoliberal turn with a focus on criminalisation and punishment. Comaroff
and Comarroff (2006) highlight this question in reference to South Africa,
noting what they view as an obsession with law and order in the country
and in the postcolony more generally. These authors highlight the obsession
with criminality in public discourses hostile to labouring women – prostitutes,
hawkers, ‘illicit’ alcohol brewers – for whom legal formality is not an option
in many African countries. Feminist materialist analyses contend that women’s
labour and sexuality are central to women’s oppression within capitalist
societies, and unpack patriarchal and capitalist interests in exploiting women’s
(affective) labour (Luxton 2001: 70). Under neoliberalism, the superficial
distinction made between the sphere of cultural oppression and oppressions
based on the political economy has proceeded unabated. The result is a
lack of sufficient attention to the sex/gender systems which structure the
organisation of labour, both in the formal and informal economy. In many
societies across Africa, patriarchal norms further reinforce this distinction,
mystifying the informalisation of women’s labour.
The above critiques illustrate some instances where neoliberalism
undermines what Campbell has referred to as the ‘pan-Africanism of states’
(Campbell 2005: 9). Yet the social costs of neoliberalism have fomented
struggles, which highlight its class, gender and other contradictions. These
struggles dramatise what might be considered as a form of ‘pan-Africanism
from below’ or a pan-Africanism of the people. As Konings (2011) notes,
beyond the multiple trajectories of societies in Africa, the diversity of
neoliberal experiments in the continent could also be explained by the variety

of resistances to neoliberalism. Scholars have, for instance, demonstrated the
direct correlation between the adoption of structural adjustment programmes
and protest movements in Africa (Bratton and van de Walle 1997: 133).
Beyond the reforms that largely benefited political elites and the austerity
measures that have provoked riots in many countries since the beginning
of the 1980s (with a global resurgence since 2008), these protests are also
linked to the progressive erosion of governmental authority, perceived as the
bearer of new constraints imposed from outside (Hilgers 2012: 90). These
worldwide anti-austerity struggles confer an internationalist perspective on
the ways in which neoliberalism’s onslaught on the working classes ought
to be understood and confronted. They furthermore, confound a pan-
Africanist politics, which while emphasising Africa’s general marginalisation,
fails to acknowledge the complexities that implicate the continental elite in
the massive dispossession of labouring classes. The extent then, to which
resistances approximate and articulate feminist desires and demands on the
state is a much more exigent task than the mere representation of women’s
demands on a continental scale.
Concluding discussion
I have sought to highlight neoliberalism’s contradictory systemic tendencies
and the challenges these pose for pan-African feminist organising. The
homogenising impacts of these are felt in remarkably similar ways across
borders, evidenced by the broad features of informal economies that lock
women in low-paying, low-skilled, exploitative and temporary forms of work.
The paltry incomes women earn in the informal sector cannot be separated
from the gendered and sexist exploitation of wage labour in the formal
economy. It is the squeeze of wages in the middle-income categories and
segmentation there that determines the regimentation and valuation of labour
as skilled/unskilled labour, educated/uneducated labour supply. In other words,
an upward shift of wage earnings in the informal economy would likely benefit
women across the labour market, both formal and informal. The factors that
precipitate such a shift, and which feminist demands on African governments
ought to reflect, should be structural reforms that radically shift the policies,
conditions and institutions that facilitate precarity in the informal economy.
In other words, pan-African feminists are faced with the task of forging
solidarity beyond a gendered identification, towards a class solidarity that
engages and amplifies various mechanisms of labour organising in recognition
of a shared and systemic oppression under global capitalism, which manifests
also at the level of the household unit. It is from this perspective that it
might be possible to hold African states accountable. Feminists have, in this
regard, to challenge pan-Africanism’s tendency towards the universalisation of
oppressions among Africans, of which labouring women form a distinct and
numerical majority. Feminists emphasise the links between a global political
economy which functions perniciously to undermine the working classes, and
implicates the ruling classes, be they of African, European or Asian origin
(Naples and Desai, 2003). The greatest test is then the ability of feminists to
challenge this highly dispersed global order by forging solidarity with workers’
demands as a precondition for progressive pan-African politics.
My discussion has sought to shed light on the ways in which labour
informalisation is gendered, with implications for a feminist emancipatory
agenda. It highlighted the challenges that working within a normatively defined
framework of ‘labour rights’ presents for pan-African feminist struggles.
While feminist claims directed towards states in Africa gained particular
salience within the political liberalisation that ushered in democratisation,
the separation between the ‘political’ and the ‘economic’ under neoliberal
orthodoxy constrains interpretations of women’s structurally defined
positions in the global political economy. Furthermore, the constraints which
neoliberalism imposes upon African states are indicative of contradictions
inherent in seeking to mediate the marginalisation of labouring women
through a pan-Africanism articulated from ‘above’, given that African states
are themselves not neutral actors in the processes that have entrenched
immiseration among workers. Yet the centrality of states in pan-Africanist
struggles cannot be gainsaid. For feminists, this means stepping back from
the valourisation of the state, critically confronting its limitations in the face
of global hegemonic powers, and working towards a re-conceptualisation
of pan-Africanism which takes seriously the subjective conditions of labour
produced under neoliberalism. What would it mean to place human beings
before profits?
Endnotes
1. Jayati Ghosh. 2007. Remark made during a discussion session, IDEAS conference
in Memory of Guy Mhone on Sustainable Employment Generation in Developing
Countries: Current Constraints and Alternative Strategies, January 25-27, in
Nairobi, Kenya.
2. Mama (2013) has referred to this often invisible aspect of women’s labour as the
“quiet power of African women, manifest in extensive subaltern farming, trading
and provisioning networks through which African women sustain [...] families,
communities and societies”.
3. According to the UNDP’s “rough estimates” at the global level, if unpaid activities
were valued at prevailing wages, they would amount to $16 trillion or about 70
percent of total world output ($23 trillion). Of this $16 trillion, $11 trillion, or
almost 69 percent, represent women’s work (UNDP 1995).
References
Bayart, Jean-Francois (2007), Global subjects: A political critique of globalization,
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beneria, Lourdes (2001), Shifting the Risk: New Employment Patterns, Informalisation
and Women’s Work, Mimeo, Cornell University, New York.
------------ (1999), ‘Globalization, Gender And The Davos Man’, Feminist Economics,
5(3):61-83.
Bratton, Michael and van de Walle, Nicholas (1997), Democratic experiments in
Africa, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, Wendy (1995), States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brownhill, Leigh (2009), Land, Food, Freedom: Struggles for the Gendered Commons
in Kenya – 1870 to 2007. New Jersey: Africa World Press Inc.
Cabral, Amilcar (1973), Return to the Source, London: Monthly Review Press.
Campbell, Horace (2005), ‘Walter Rodney and Pan-Africanism Today’, Presentation at
the Africana Studies Research Center Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, Africana
Colloquium Series.
Carr, Marilyn and Chen, Martha (2002), ‘Globalization and the Informal Economy: How
Global Trade and Investment Impact on the Working Poor’, Working Paper on the
Informal Economy, No. 1, ILO, Geneva.
Casale, Daniela (2003). The rise in female labour force participation in South Africa:
an analysis of household survey data, 1995-2001, Ph.D. dissertation, Division of
Economics, University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Casale, Daniela & Posel, Dori (2002). The continued feminisation of the labour force
in South Africa: an analysis of recent data and trends, South African Journal of
Economics, 70(1), 156-184.
Chatterjee, Ipsita (2012), ‘Feminism, the false consciousness of neoliberal capitalism?

Informalization, fundamentalism, and women in an Indian city’, Gender, Place &
Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, Vol. 19(6): 790-809.
Chant, Sylvia and Caroline Pedwell (2008) Women, Gender and the Informal Economy:
An Assessment of ILO Research and Suggested Ways Forward, International
Labour Organisation (ILO) Discussion Paper, Geneva: ILO.
Chen, Martha, Joann Vanek and James Heintz (2006) ‘Informality, gender and poverty:
a global picture’ Economic and Political Weekly, 27 May, 2131–9.
Chen, Martha (2006), ‘Rethinking the informal economy: Linkages with the formal
economy and informal regulatory environment’, in B. Guha-Khasnobis, R. Kanbur
and E. Ostrom (eds.), Linking the Formal and Informal Economy: Concepts and
Measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, M., M. Bhatt and Pat Horn (2000), Women Street Vendors: The Road to
Recognition. SEEDS Pamphlet Series, Population Council, New York.
Comaroff, Jean and Comaroff, John (2006), Law and disorder in the postcolony,
Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press
Dhawan, Nikita (2007), ‘Can the Subaltern Speak German? And Other Risky Questions:
Migrant Hybridism versus Subalternity, Translate. Available online at: <http://
translate.eipcp.net/strands/03/dhawan-strands01en> (accessed on 14/05/2014).
Ferguson, James (1990), The anti-politics machine: ‘development’, depoliticization,
and bureaucratic power in Lesotho, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ghosh, Jayati (2007), IDEAS conference in Memory of Guy Mhone on Sustainable
Employment Generation in Developing Countries: Current Constraints and
Alternative Strategies, January 25-27, in Nairobi, Kenya
Haque, Shamsul M. (2008), ‘Global rise of neoliberal state and its impact on citizenship:
Experiences in Developing Nations’, Asian Journal of Social Science 36: 11–34.
Harrison, Graham (2010), Neoliberal Africa: The impact of global social engineering,
London, Zed Books.
Hilgers, Mathieu (2012), ‘The Historicity of the Neoliberal State’, Social Anthropology,
20(1): 80-94.
------------- (2011), ‘Autochthony as a capital in a global age’, Theory, Culture and
Society, 28: 34-54.
ILO (2002a), ‘Decent work and the informal economy,’ Report of the Director-General,
International Labour Conference, 90th Session, Report VI, ILO, Geneva.
---------- (2002b), ‘ILO compendium of official statistics on employment in the
informal sector,’ STAT Working Paper, 2002 – No.1.
------------ (2007a), ‘The Informal Economy, Committee on Employment and Social
Policy, for Debate and Guidance, Geneva: International Labour Office.
Jaggar, Alison M. (2001), ‘Is Globalization Good for Women?’ Comparative Literature,
Vol. 53(4): 298-314.
Klasen, Stephen & Woolard, Ingrid (2000). Surviving unemployment without state
support: unemployment and household formation in South Africa, Journal of
African Economies, 18(1), 1-51.
Konings, Piet (2011), The politics of neoliberal reforms in Africa: State and civil
society in Cameroon, Bamenda Cameroon: Langaa Publishers.
Lee, Simon and McBride, Stephen eds. (2007), Neo-liberalism, state power and global
governance, Dordrecht: Springer.
Lindell, Ilda (2010), ‘Introduction: the changing politics of informality – collective
organising, alliances and scales of engagement’, in Ilda Lindell (ed), Africa’s
Informal Workers: Collective Agency, Alliances and Transnational Organising in
Urban Africa, London: Zed Books.
Lourenço-Lindell, Ilda (2004), ‘Trade and the politics of informalisation in Bissau,
Guinea-Bissau’, in Karen, T. Hansen and Mariken Vaa (eds), Reconsidering
Informality: Perspectives from Urban Africa, Nordiska Africainstitutet, Uppsala.
Luxton, Meg (2001), ‘Feminism as a Class Act: Working-Class Feminism and the
Women’s Movement in Canada’, Labour/Le Travail, 48: 63-88.
Macharia, Sarah W. (2007), ‘A feminist postempiricist study of approaches to the
governance of urban “informal trade”: Case studies of Nairobi and Durban, Ph.D
Dissertation, Toronto: York University.
Mama, Amina (2013), Pan-Africanism: beyond survival to renaissance? Address to
the African Union 50th Anniversary Heads of State Summit, Addis Ababa, on 28
June 2013.
Mhone, Guy (1996), ‘Conceptual and analytical issues’, In Guy Mhone (ed), The
Informal Sector in Southern Africa: An Analysis of Conceptual Research and
Policy Issues, Southern Africa Regional Institute for Policy Studies, Harare: Sapes
Books.
Maoulidi, Salma (2009), ‘Contemporary Africa and Pan-Africanism: Articulation, unity
and inclusion, Pambazuka News, Issue 427.
Mitullah, Winnie V. (2010), ‘Informal workers in Kenya and transnational organising:
networking and leveraging resources, in Ilda Lindell (ed), Africa’s informal
workers: Collective agency, alliances and transnational organising in urban
Africa, London: Zed Books.
Moore, Henrietta (1994), Is there a crisis in the family?’ Geneva: UNRISD, Occasional
Paper no. 3, World Summit for Social Development.
O’laughlin, Bridget (1997), Missing Men? The Debate Over Rural Poverty and Women-
Headed Households in Southern Africa, ISS Working Paper Series No. 252.
Olukoshi, Adebayo, A. and Wohlgemuth (eds) (1995), A Road to Development: Africa
in the 21st Centrury, Uppsala: Nordiska, Africainstitutet.
----------- (2006), Neoliberalism as exception, Chapel Hill, NC: Duke University Press.
Prasad, Monica (2006), The politics of free markets: The rise of neoliberal economic
policies in Britain, France,Germany, and the United State, Chicago, IL: University
of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, Karl (1957), The Great Transformation: The political and economic origins
of our time, Boston: Beacon.
Razavi, Shahra (2007), ‘Liberalisation and the Debates on Women’s Access to Land’,
Third World Quarterly, 28(8): 1479-1500.
Sassen, Saskia (2002), ‘Women’s Burden: Counter-Geographies of Globalisation and
the Feminization of Survival’, Nordic Journal of International Law, 71: 255-274.
Sassen, Saskia (1994), ‘The Informal Economy: Between New Developments and Old
Regulations’, The Yale Law Journal, 103(8): 2289-2304.
Sethuraman, S. V. (1998), Gender, Informality and Poverty: A Global Review – Gender
Bias in Female Informal Employment and Incomes in Developing Countries,
Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, World Bank, Washington DC, and
WIEGO, Geneva.
Tsikata, Dzodzi (2009a), ‘Gender, Land and Labour Relations and Livelihoods in Sub-
Saharan Africa in the Era of Economic Liberalisation: Towards a Research Agenda’,
Feminist Africa, Issue 12: 11-30. Available online at: <http://agi.ac.za/sites/agi.
ac.za/files/fa_12_entire_journal.pdf> (accessed on 26 April 2014).
------------ (2009b), ‘Informalization, the Informal Economy and Urban Women’s
Livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa since the 1990s’, in Shahra Razavi (ed), The
Gendered Impacts of Liberalization: Towards Embedded Liberalism? New York:
Routledge.
UNDP (United Nations Development Program). 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999. Human
Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Verick, Sher (2006), The Impact of Globalization on the Informal Sector in Africa,
UNECA. Available online at: <http://www.iza.org/conference_files/worldb2006/
verick_s872.pdf> (accessed on 5 March 2014).
Making a Difference: Embracing the challenge

of women’s substantive engagement in
political leadership in Uganda1
Josephine Ahikire, Peace Musiimenta
and Amon Ashaba Mwiine
Introduction
The campaign for women’s participation in public life has taken several years
and efforts, and the outcomes are reflected in international human rights
frameworks as well as national efforts that acknowledge women’s right to
participate in public space. On the African scene these efforts have delivered
considerable numbers and hence considerable progress has been registered in
terms of women’s presence (Wang 2013). At the parliamentary level, several
countries have achieved well beyond the critical mass (Rwanda 63,8%;
South Africa 44,8%; Senegal 43,3%; Mozambique 39,2% and Tanzania
36%). Uganda comes on the heels of its African peers with 35% per cent of
women in Parliament.2 Other key numbers in Uganda include 30% minimum
women representation at local government level (as provided for in the Local
Governments Act 1997), 29% of the cabinet and 39% of the chairpersons
and 29% of the vice-chairpersons of the standing committees of Parliament
(FOWODE, 2013). In recent times, women have been appointed to head key
ministries of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Education, Health,
Energy and Mineral Development, as well as Ministry of Trade and Industry.
Women’s presence in political decision-making is largely premised on the
fact that women in such spaces will make a difference for women’s rights,
development and gender equality. The question of making a difference has
enjoined a robust feminist debate in the direction that, once in power, women
should change the content of politics to cater for women’s interests (Tamale
1999; Goetz 2003; Kwesiga et al. 2003). However, as the numbers of women
in public political decision-making increase in many parts of the world, it has
become more evident than ever that the strategy of getting women in formal
political spaces is only part of what it takes to engender democracy. Therefore,
the question that has preoccupied the women’s movement (globally) for the
last decade or so is how to move beyond numbers. Put differently, the desire
is to move from physical presence to strategic engagement (Ahikire, 2007).
There exists a sense of frustration amongst key actors in the women’s
movement, as well as gender-aware women leaders, that, despite women’s
increasing numbers in decision making, positive change for women is not
happening as fast as we would want. The status of Ugandan women is still
remarkably lower than that of men in all spheres: from that of politics and
citizenship, to the economy, socio-cultural spheres, or in intimate personal
relations. For example, feminised poverty, gender-based violence and the
generalised lack of respect and fulfillment of women’s rights seem to be the
norm as opposed to the exception.
But why, in the first place, did we assume that numbers of women in
decision-making spaces would automatically lead to gender-fair outcomes
in actual practice? A robust feminist debate claims that women are as
heterogeneous as their interests, and being female does not automatically
translate into the will or the ability to pursue a feminist agenda (Tamale, 1999;
Hassim, 2005). There is need for a much more sober approach that promises
to take on the complexities involved in such political processes. This calls for
a critical reflection, especially on the fact that women’s physical presence has
to be consciously translated into strategic presence (Ahikire, 2009) through a
political process, which brings several players into focus. These players include,
in addition to women leaders, the women’s movement and the State—two
different entities with very different capabilities. Outcomes of women’s
physical presence in the State then seem to hinge more on the articulation of
the nexus between women in the State and the women’s movement, and the
ways in which this nexus is brought to bear on the decision-making processes
in the State arena.
This article emanates from the aforementioned study conducted by ISIS-
WICCE (Women International Cross Cultural Exchange), which sought to make
a contribution to a holistic understanding of conditions under which women
in Parliament and Local Councils (LCs) can make a difference. To achieve
this, the focus quickly moved forward from the basic questions such as: “Do
women represent women?” or “Do women in politics make a difference?”
to questions like “What mark have women made?”; “Under what conditions
has change been possible?” and more specifically “How is the nexus between
women’s political leadership and the women’s movement been positioned in

all this?”
To pursue these questions, the ISIS-WICCE study sought to establish
whether or not there existed a shared agenda between the women’s movement
and women politicians and how such an agenda has been pursued with
what outcomes. The researchers set about carefully registering the factors
facilitating and inhibiting change in the gender regimes that pervade current
governance challenges such as militarism, patronage, fundamentalism, as well
as the intense sexualisation of political spaces.
Registering Women’s Mark in Political Leadership
For the first time women became a subject of discussion which was not
the case before. Women became an issue in the public space. They started
highlighting issues that affect them as women and proposing what they
would want to amend for their economic empowerment. The women in
Uganda became visible and audible to the extent that you could not just
do without them. They were the second powerful interest group that
embraced the constitution with enthusiasm, energy, and hope. They were
visible at last… (Hon. Miria Matembe, July 2013).
The physical presence of women signified a critical breakthrough, an initial
step of breaking into a domain that was historically not theirs. Without doubt,
that presence engendered a significant shift in the public conversation. The
fact that women leaders, particularly women Members of Parliament (MPs),
have put what was regarded as private issues into the public space constitutes
an achievement for women to celebrate. A female former MP had this to say:
I wanted to join politics and use my position to advocate for women’s
rights and the right to refuse to undergo female genital mutilation
(FGM). I hoped to bring about a change in a culture that oppresses
women…(Interview with female former MP, Kampala, July 2013).
In Northern Uganda, women councillors have specifically positioned themselves
as the voice of peace, and women councillors in Pader and Agago districts
have apparently influenced the public visibility of topics such as gender-based
violence, defilement, and rape. Voices from Agago District indicated that:
Women leaders are making a difference in the specific area of GBV. In
cases of a grave nature, the women give the victims referral letters to
health centres, LC3 and LC5. We have been able to handle cases that
women leaders have referred to us. As I talk now, I have left 20 men
in the cells for cases of defilement, rape and wife battering (male key
informant, Agago District, July, 2013).
We had a case of medical personnel who wanted to have sex they agreed
with the woman but instead of having sex he pushed in his hand and
damaged the woman. After some time she started rotting and later died.
When the women leaders heard about this story they demonstrated
and took the man to the police. Another incident was on Women’s Day
when a man hacked his wife. Women mobilised, demonstrated and made
sure that the man is taken to the police. Therefore women are making
a difference in the area of human rights. (ISIS-WICCE Dialogue with
women Councillors and V/ Chairperson, Agago District, July, 2013)
Women MPs have raised a red flag on many cases of sexual abuse, especially
those that involve young girls in schools, as an urgent issue of national
concern. Consider the case below:
Thank you, Madam Speaker. I rise on an urgent matter of national
importance. Last weekend I attended Women’s Day celebrations in
Paya sub-county and among the reports that I received from the LC III
chairman was that from January to 28 March, 124 girls had been defiled.
… When a child leaves home, the other parent to that child is the teacher,
but now the teacher is the one defiling this girl. What is this teacher
instilling in this girl as a person of moral authority? I am requesting that
when these cases get reported, they are dealt with without fear or favour.
I am requesting government to actually ensure that those who defile
children are punished accordingly… (Woman MP, Tororo: Parliament of
Uganda – Hansard; Wednesday, 1 April 2009).
Women’s movements across the African region have mounted sustained
resistance to entrenched sexual and gender-based violence, including cultural
practices that are harmful to women. These struggles are a significant site for
challenging oppressive gender relations more broadly and demystifying the
invocations of tradition and religion to justify damaging practices. The African
women’s movement has also engaged the political sphere on the premise that
women’s interests would be advanced by women’s entry into decision-making
spaces such as the Parliament.
The increased presence of women in Ugandan political institutions has

without doubt led to significantly more debate on women’s condition,
especially that to do with maternal health. In 2013, the Red Pepper
Newspaper ran an article entitled: “Women MPs Demand Action from
Government over Maternal Deaths”. The Women MPs resolved to block the
passing of the 2013-2014 National Budget and any supplementary budget
that Government might present, unless it included a health sector supplement,
or saw the Government’s fulfilling the 15% funding of the health sector to
maternal health that was agreed in the Abuja Declaration (2001)3, to which
Uganda’s government was party (15 July 2013). Furthermore, ISIS-WICCE
learned that women MPs were instrumental in ensuring the provision of the
basic birthing equipment provided in packages known as “maama kits”4 in
local constituency health centres. Implementation remains a challenge in the
context of run-down social services, where even rudimentary resources are
shamelessly lacking, thus stalling the impact of women’s legislative efforts on
ordinary women’s lives.
Women’s organising within the political institutions of the Sate has also
had some impact. The Uganda Women Parliamentary Association (UWOPA) is a
parliamentary caucus that has been an important space for policy interventions,
working to support women parliamentarians to utilise their position more
effectively. UWOPA provides a forum to discuss, share experiences and support
activities that facilitate women’s participation and leadership with the ultimate
aim of ensuring a gender-responsive legislative process. Because it is an
institutionalised space, UWOPA facilitates women’s influence in parliamentary
processes. It has successfully pushed a number of gender-sensitive pieces of
legislation through parliament, notably the Domestic Violence Act (2010) and
the Law against Female Genital Mutilation. The Prevention of Trafficking in
Persons Act (2010) was passed as a private members bill by the chairperson
of UWOPA, and he revision of the Penal and Sexual Offences Bill is directly
attributed to the effort of UWOPA. There are also provisions in various pieces
of legislation that can be traced to the fact of women’s presence. These include
provisions around maternity leave in the Employment Act 2006, the clause
around family land in the Land Act 1998 (amendment of 2004), and the girl-
child focus in education policies, to mention but a few.
Women MPs have also used UWOPA as a key lobby site. The specific case
of the African Union (AU) Protocol to the African Charter on Human and
People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa5 is instructive. States have

been known to sign such instruments and not ratify them, meaning that there
is limited possibility to infuse such norms into national laws and policies.
In the Ugandan case, the Protocol was ratified in 2010, seven years after
being signed. Yet it is important to register the fact that that ratification was
specifically lobbied for by women leaders in parliament and in civil society.
With the back-up of the women’s organisations, the then-chair of UWOPA
ensured that the President ratified the Protocol when Uganda was due to host
the 15th African Union Summit, in 2010.6 In actual fact, UWOPA argued that
it would be a shame for Uganda as a country to host the AU summit when
it had not ratified the Protocol. Overall, limitations notwithstanding, UWOPA
provides an opportunity for the women’s movement to influence public policy.
Women’s presence demonstrates their ability to govern in various other
ways. For example, the ascendance of a woman, the Rt. Hon. Rebecca Alitwala
Kadaga, to the position of Speaker of Parliament, to occupying the third
position in the hierarchy of leadership in the country (after the President and
Vice-President), is no mean achievement. It is an achievement that should
be documented to draw lessons for the present and future. Kadaga entered
parliament as a district woman MP (the affirmative action seat for women).
In the 7th and 8th Parliaments, she became Deputy Speaker. When she became
Deputy, her designation as ‘Madam Speaker’ and her visibility in the 7th and
8th Parliaments challenged the male norm. So much so, that when the Deputy
(a male) presides over the parliamentary sessions, many members apparently
stumble between ‘Madam’ and ‘Mr. Speaker, Sir’. The Speaker of the East
African Legislative Assembly (EALA) is a Ugandan woman, Rt. Hon. Margaret
Nantongo Zziwa, the first woman elected to the position.7 As Speakers of
legislatures at the national and regional levels, the duo have demonstrated
women’s ability to govern.
Yet, despite all these efforts there seems to be a critical glass ceiling when
it comes to effecting transformation. Women’s influence seems to be limited,
with women still regarded as clients in the current system. What is it that
blocks a substantive articulation of a feminist agenda? In the section that
follows, we seek to interrogate this question but with full appreciation, not
only of the fact that female does not necessarily mean feminist, but also that
substantive engagement is largely constrained by the structural context.
Understanding the obstacles

When we see an increase of women in many leadership positions, it is
exciting… but leadership with a difference is clearly still a challenge.
Now we are enjoying the positions, but what difference are we making?
(Woman MP, Zombo District ISIS-WICCE Dialogue for Women MPs, July
12, 2013).
Ann-Marie Goetz summarises the situation in this way:
Once in office, many women have faced profound obstacles to advancing
a gender-equality agenda. In effect, they have discovered deeply
embedded gender-biased patterns in public decision-making and policy
implementation that stop progressive public policy in its tracks. While
some of the obstacles women face stem from divisions between
women…most stem from challenges…where profound gender biases
are embedded in the justice and public administration systems (Goetz,
2009:5).
Women’s political leadership faces several hurdles at local and national levels.
Patriarchy manifests in the nature of the State, and its political processes
provide a conducive environment to men as political actors. It is argued, for
example, that the institution of Parliament is patriarchal because women still
have to constantly justify their presence and their issues. At the local level,
patriarchy also plays out in the existing cultural institutions that nurture
women and men differently, conferring gender-differentiated social capital
that limits women’s effectiveness.
The example of Uganda illustrates many key blockages to women’s effective
decision-making, blockages that make it difficult for feminist legislators to
make a difference. In this analysis we go beyond the conventional liberal
approaches of relying on gender training and capacity building. These are
premised on the notion that it is women who are lacking. Rather we seek
to highlight obstacles that are structural in nature: the prevailing culture of
militarism, the normalised sexualisation of women, and the patronage politics
characterising the multiparty dispensation.
Militarised Politics
Militarism is not just about war and armed forces. It is an ideology. Ursula
Franklin (1988) defines militarism as a threat system, which when stripped
of all its extraneous verbiage simply says “Do what I tell you – or else”.
Accordingly, the basic value of militarism is power over others, where the
population begins to accept the use of violence as a method for resolving
conflict. Military ideology creates an enemy out of difference and then uses
the existence of the enemy to justify continued militarism (Burke 1998). The
ideology is normalised through language, which distorts and sanitises its
impact (Burke 1998). Key African feminist scholars such as Amina Mama have
for long advanced the analysis that feminists must as of necessity take on
the permeation of militarism in African politics if we are to create substantive
transformation. Mama and Okazawa-Rey (2008) argue that anti-militarism
activism must be a key area of feminist strategy in the contemporary period.
The situation in Uganda reflects militarised politics more than ever before.
Many women MPs expressed their sense of threat. While this militarism
undermines the exercise of democracy more generally, women are more
vulnerable to the threat of force. The period from 2001 to date, with a
transition from mobilisation politics to a politics of regime survival, has
seen constitutionalism undermined. In this context, the space for pushing a
substantive gender-equality agenda in the political dispensation has narrowed
dramatically.
Multiparty Politics and Patronage

The research interviews suggest that the nature of Uganda’s multiparty politics
has greatly inhibited the emergence of a unified women’s voice at national
and local levels. The creation of enemies based on political differences and
the overly personalised party agendas make it extremely difficult for women
to generate a strong lobby to advance women’s interests.
When a political party takes precedence over other social parameters of
mobilisation, women’s interests can only be taken up when the party position
reflects these. Women MPs emphasise that women’s issues cannot be effectively
addressed because women cannot form a coherent political constituency. As
one MP noted: “Because the party brought you to Parliament, it can discipline
you if you go against its position” (ISIS-WICCE Dialogue, 13 July 2013).
However, this is not just an individual matter. Women MPs from the
ruling and opposition parties alike all note the constraining impact of the
multiparty dispensation. The imposition of party gagging that is not guided
by clear principles and party rules illustrates the patriarchal and militaristic
domineering practices within the parties. In the case of the NRM, it was noted
that the party caucus seems to operate as a “cult”, while those in opposition
parties talked of undue witch-hunting often directed at women considered
undesirably strong or independent-minded.
In this context the majority of women are seen to have been captive to
patronage politics. Patronage was perceived as a powerful tide moving against
the achievements of women in politics:
Women are swimming upstream and there is a powerful tide moving
against them downstream. It is a tide of patronage. It’s the kind of
patronage where people think they put you there and expect you to
perform to their tune. The tide of patronage is still strong and needs to
be confronted head-on (male former legislator, ISIS-WICCE Dialogue,
July 2013).
Such a relationship between the government and women political leaders
undermines their capacity to demand accountability and pursue social justice
agendas.
The Crippling Effect of Sexual Pacification8

Pacification is a term derived from the process of colonisation as a tool
for conquest, extended here to conceptualise the particular exercise of
power to disempower women through sexual practices. The sexualisation of
political space persistently emerges as a major obstacle to women’s political
effectiveness. This was seen to manifest itself in the lived experience of
women political leaders, reflecting the dominant discourses that frame women
as sexual objects rather than political actors.
At the district level women political leaders decried the sexualised language
used to describe them. They indicated that, quite often, women who choose
to participate in politics are commonly stigmatised as “prostitutes”, portrayed
as lacking either the courage or the self-control to participate alongside men.
Women councillors revealed that men often refer to women’s bodies, dress
style, and social interactions to intimidate, confuse or divert the attention
of women councilors during local council debates. Even the most resilient
women are undermined by this kind of intimidation:
I stood up in council to contribute. I had not known that as I was
standing up, the button of my blouse opened. Then a male councillor
stood up on a point of order… “Is it in order for the honorable member
to dress indecently in the house?” It was so embarrassing, I could not
proceed. He had focused on my abdomen not even my mouth and what

I was going to say (Woman Councillor, Pader Town Council, July, 2013).
Sexualised politics manifests in patronising behaviours, sexist jokes, and
derogatory media representations9 describing women political leaders in terms
of ‘best legs’, ‘big bums’ and the like. Cultural stereotyping and name-calling
undermine female political leadership (IPU, 2009).
Perhaps the most daunting challenge is the predatory nature of men in
political institutions:
... Men are like hyenas; very greedy…they look at female policy makers
as sexual objects. If some could dare at me, what happens to the young
women? It is very dangerous for young women from up-country… who
find themselves rubbing shoulders with these so-called big men they
used to hear and see on the TV. (Interview with female former legislator,
Kampala, July 2013).
In 1999, Tamale stirred up controversy by documenting sexualisation as part
of the gendered nature of parliamentary politics. At this time her revelations
were received as exceptional rather than the norm. However, the sexualisation
of women is now so pervasive that even the president of the country was
quoted in a daily newspaper stating that the male MPs were consistently broke
and indebted because they spent most of their money on “MP concubines”.
The newspaper article read, in part:
The report penned recently lists sex as number one among terrible secrets
that have dipped them into an awful financial quagmire. It says some
male MPs spend their money financing sexual networks with fellow
female legislators. Horny male MPs have had a huge drain on their
incomes orchestrated by their MP concubines (Red Pepper Newspaper,
27 July 2013).
To make matters more complicated, key informants in the study raised the
issue of sexual transactions in political recruitment. Political favours often
depend on women’s willingness to yield to sexual advances. Appointment
to ministerial positions stood out as one big sexual battle. For example,
top men in the system are alleged to use overt threats such as: “I have seen
the tentative list and your name is there, but you need to do something if
you want to make it to the final list of ministers” (ISIS-WICCE, July 2013,
anonymous source).
From a systemic perspective, whether or not women give in to these sexual

advances is immaterial: women in general get to be labeled in sexualised
terms while predatory men maintain their legitimacy as political actors.
In sum, the sexualisation of political spaces has profound effects on how
women can deliver on their leadership roles. At a practical level it disorients
and diverts women and negatively affects women’s self-expression and
esteem. At the same time, sexuality is deployed as an instrument of blackmail,
creating a “damned if you do…damned if you do not” scenario. In such a
situation, the push for a gender-equality agenda is undermined. A feminist
response to this problem of sexual pacification will have to embrace a political
process that challenges the sexual pacification of women by men in the
strongest terms possible.
The Political Costs of Dismantling Patriarchy

The political culture in Uganda today tends to reject strong and effective women
leaders. Women’s efforts to confront male domination often position women
political leaders between a rock and a hard place. Challenging the system they
work in was widely described as an attempt to “rock their own boat”. Effective
women politicians often end up sacrificing their political careers:
A senior woman MP was considered too strong for her party because
she would take on the male leaders where they went wrong, contrary to
the party culture where the leaders are only supposed to be worshipped.
In the wake of the general elections in 2011, party functionaries were
heavily deployed to fight her. Another woman was secretly identified and
provided with money and other logistical support to contest against her.
During the campaigns, the Secretary General of the party camped in her
constituency for over 5 days to campaign for her opponent. The senior
woman MP lost the election. The big lesson, according to this former MP,
was that the current party practice only supports women who tend to
sing praises for the leaders. The moment one thinks independently and
pursues what is right, that person is looking for a humiliating defeat
(ISIS-WICCE July 2013).
Although men can also pay political costs for thinking or acting independently,
women are particularly penalised in a political space where the prevailing norms
and practices undermine any leverage they might have to effectively engage.
The Nexus between Women Political Leaders and the

Women’s Movement
Feminist scholars argue that women’s interests are best defined through
collective processes of interest articulation (Celis et al., 2007). In Uganda
there have been many efforts to bring women political leaders and the
women’s movement together. According to the findings of the ISIS-WICCE
study, women’s organisations work to identify and support women to
aspire for elective political positions, run programmes on gender and civic
education and democracy, design mechanisms of accountability, and offer
gender capacity-building workshops to which women MPs and councillors are
invited. Despite these laudable activities, a sense of frustration persists. The
frustration stems from a realisation that structural gender inequalities have
persisted and major obstacles to the advancement of women still remain. The
relationships between women political leaders and the women’s movement
that will consistently bring these actors together remain weak. Yet without
a stronger nexus, Uganda’s women’s movement will be unable to nurture a
robust feminist political agenda.
In Uganda, this nexus comprises women NGOs and women political leaders.
One of the ways of strengthening the relationship between the two has been
through the NGOs’ provision of training. NGOs train women candidates for
electoral office and offer induction programmes for newly elected women
MPs and local councillors. NGOs also run different programmes in the pre-
and post-election periods, offering leadership skills training for women in
public office. It is in this context that ISIS-WICCE offers training around the
specific challenges posed by post-conflict situations.
There have also been attempts at creating a shared agenda. FOWODE
(2010) sees this as a means of bringing to the forefront gender dimensions
that ought to be addressed, so that real and meaningful development for the
total empowerment of women and girls can be achieved. The production of
the Uganda Women’s Agenda is part of a journey that the women of Uganda
and the Women’s Movement began in 1996. At that time Ugandan women
made history as pioneers of the highly successful People’s Manifesto (1996),
an action that was followed by The Women’s Manifesto (2001). On Uganda’s
return to pluralism in 2005, women consulted nationally and developed a
position paper on Government’s white paper on multipartyism. The women’s
demands came to be known as “Women’s Minimum Demands to Political
Parties and Organizations”. This was subsequently followed by an updated

Women’s Manifesto (2006). In preparation for the 2011 general elections,
FOWODE facilitated a process of putting together a women’s agenda entitled
“Equal by Right”, which was designed to guide the women’s movement.
Despite these commendable efforts, the reality is that they have not been
able to do more than sustain loose, largely informal, connections between the
women’s movement and women political leaders. In the meantime women
MPs are still chastised for forgetting their roots in the women’s movement,
while women MPs accuse the women’s movement of having unrealistic
demands.
NGO approaches to women political leaders have not been sufficiently
systematic, in the face of persisting systemic inequalities. Part of the problem
lies in the nature of NGOs under pressure to validate themselves by claiming
credit as individual organisations rather than as a women’s movement
(Dialogue for Women’s NGOs Organised by ISIS-WICCE, August 2013).
NGO programming tends to work from an individualistic capacity-building
approach that does not do justice to the task of building a collective force of
women that will unite around the pursuit of women’s gender interests.
Conversations with women MPs show a critical perspective on NGO
approaches for mounting numerous ad hoc programmes. The workshop
culture is criticised for dealing with women MPs in generalised terms while
offering very little that might concretely enhance their ability to pursue the
gender equality agenda in their legislative, oversight and representational
roles.
At another level, there does not appear to be a shared sense of direction, or
a systemic analysis of gender oppression. This is reflective of the fact that the
women’s movement, being largely located within NGOs, has become issue-
based, more reactive than proactive. As Tamale puts it:
“We only come up in response to specific issues and we do not sustain
the pressure even on those specific ones…We are dealing with a long-term
issue yet employing short-term strategies. It cannot work…It is a silver bullet,
crisis approach rather than a sustained continuous social movement” (Tamale,
2003).
The second and perhaps more serious challenge arises from the first:
Because there is no direction, it has not been possible to consolidate the
modest advances that have been made into more formidable political leverage.
Without a more systematic approach it may be unrealistic to expect women

leaders to make more of a difference.
Conclusion: Towards Feminist Transformation

This report was commissioned to support the planning of strategies to
advance more effective pursuit of feminist agendas. In the first instance this
requires overcoming the evident gap between the interests articulated by
women’s movements and the interests of women who have entered in the
political sphere (ISIS-WICCE 2014b) While there are powerful forces that block
women’s sustained efforts to make a difference in the political leadership
of Uganda today, there are a range of possible actions for the women’s
movement to turn this around. There is need for a clear political agenda that
takes on the broad issues of governance and their gendered aspects in a more
consistent manner and that is better informed by the systemic nature of the
problem. Effecting change will require a long-term vision and strategy, as well
as a concerted effort to build the women’s movement into a force powerful
enough to bring about deep changes in Ugandan politics and society.
Ultimately such a movement must reverse the status quo by ensuring that
neglecting women’s interests will become politically costly for political actors.
A vibrant well-coordinated women’s movement will need to create
alternative channels to nurture women’s political power on a much larger
scale. This can be supported by a careful non-judgmental validation of
women’s experiences, taking stock of women political leaders’ careers, and
using such testimonies to critically inform and inspire other women to pursue
political leadership. Ugandan politics remains volatile, highly informed by
historical and social-cultural processes, whose implicit and explicit impact
on political relations between women and men as political actors cannot
be underestimated. The ISIS-WICCE study finds that, while most women
politicians may wish to make a difference for women, the challenges they face
are largely systemic and thus cannot be effectively addressed by individualised
approaches or generic skills training packages.
The nexus between the women’s movement and women political leaders is
a key aspect of movement-building. It cannot be treated as a discrete project
or as a momentary event, but rather as a long-term process, purposively
powered with strategic alliances and mobilisation across social differences
and partisan allegiances. With the feminist nexus that is advocated here
strengthened in this manner, women political leaders and activists will become
part of a shared constituency, driving a more unified and robust movement
that is a real force in Ugandan politics.
Endnotes
1 This article is based on Making a Difference Beyond numbers: Towards Women’s
Substantive Engagement in Political Leadership in Uganda – a study conducted
by ISIS-WICCE (Women International Cross Cultural Exchange). The study
covered the case of Parliament and two districts in Northern Uganda (Pader and
Agago). The research team consisted of: Josephine Ahikire (lead researcher), Peace
Musiimenta, Amon Ashaba Mwiine, Ruth Ojiambo Ochieng, Juliet Were Oguttu,
Helen Kezie-Nwoha, Suzan Nkizi, Bedha Balikudembe Kirevu, Achie Luyimbazi,
Harriet Nabukeera Musoke, Prosy Nakaye and Gloria Oguttu Adeti.
2 Interparliamentary Union (IPU), http:// www.ipu.org/wmn.
3 Abuja Declaration on HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and other related infectious diseases
was reached during an African Union Summit in Abuja, Nigeria, April 2001.
4 Noted in one of the dialogues with Parliamentarians organised by ISIS-WICCE.
Maama kits refer to a simple and basic package necessary to facilitate child
delivery. These include gloves, polythene paper, razor and cotton wool.
5 The (AU) Protocol covers a wide range of women’s rights ranging from the
elimination of discrimination against women, women’s right to dignity and
security of the person, livelihood, including health and reproductive rights, social
security and protection by the state.
6 The 15th African Union Summit was held in Kampala-Uganda from 19th – 27th
July 2010 under the theme “Maternal, Infant and Child Health and Development
in Africa” see more; http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/conferences/2010/july/
summit/15thsummit.html
7 The New Vision Newspaper, “How Margaret Zziwa Won EALA Speaker Post,” 6
June 2012.
8 Concept generated during facilitated discussion at ISIS-WICCE’s 2014 Kampala
think-tank to ‘highlight the historical continuities regarding the use of violence
against African women systematised during the colonial era’ (Editor’s note).
9 See New Vision article 11 May 2011,” Beauty Survey of Female MPs Proves a
Point.”
References
Ahikire, Josephine. 2009. “Who Speaks for Whom?: Women and the Politics of
Presence in Uganda’s Local Governance”, in Goetz, A. M. ed. Governing Women:
Women’s Political Effectiveness in Contexts of Democratisation and Governance
Reform. London: Routledge.
Ahikire, Josephine. 2007. Localised or Localising Democracy: Gender and the Politics
of Decentralisation in Contemporary Uganda. Kampala: Fountain.
Action Aid International Uganda (AAIU). 2006. Mapping the Women’s Movement in
Uganda: Current Realities and Future Directions. Study Report, Kampala.
Burke, Colleen. 1999. Women and Militarism. Women’s International League for Peace
and Freedom, Switzerland. (http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/daphnetoolkit/files/
projects/1998_043/women_and_militarism_1998_043.pdf .
Celis, Karen et al. 2007. “Rethinking Women’s Substantive Representation”. Paper
prepared for the European Consortium for Political Research, Helsinki.
Clarke, Yaliwe. 2008. “Security Reform in Africa: A lost Opportunity to Deconstruct
Militarised Masculinities”, Feminist Africa 10.
Cornwall, Andrea and Goetz, Anne Marie. 2005. “Democratising Democracy: Feminist
Perspectives”, IDS Bulletin 12:5.
Franklin, Ursula. 1988. “Women and Militarism”, Canadian Women Studies Reader
9:1.
Forum for Women in Democracy (FOWODE). 2013. Handbook on Numbers of Women
in Governmental Bodies in Uganda. Kampala.
FOWODE. 2010. Equal by Right; The Uganda Women’s Agenda 2010 – 2016.
Kampala.
Goetz, Anne Marie. 2003. “The Problem with Patronage: Constraints on Women’s
Political Effectiveness in Uganda” in Goetz, A.M. and Hassim, S. eds. No Shortcuts
to Power: African Women in Politics and Policy Making. London: Zed Books.
Goetz, Anne Marie. 2009. “Governing Women: Will the New Public Space for Some
Women Make a Difference for All Women?” Governing Women: Women’s Political
Effectiveness in Contexts of Democratisation and Governance Reform. London:
Routledge.
Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). 2009. “Is Parliament Open to Women? An Appraisal
Conference for Chairpersons and Members of Parliamentary Bodies Dealing with
Gender Equality”. Geneva. (http://www.ipu.org/splz-e/gender09/summary.pdf .
IPU. “Women in National Parliaments: Situation as at May 1 2014”. http://www.ipu.
org/wmn.
ISIS-WICCE. 2014a. “The Road to Power, Governance and Decision-Making”. Report
of Kampala Think Tank.
ISIS-WICCE. 2014b. “The Harare Conversation”. Report of Think Tank 3, Hope Africa,
Harare.
ISIS-WICCE 2014c. “Making a Difference Beyond Numbers: Towards Women’s
Substantive Engagement in Political Leadership in Uganda”. Research Report
available at http://www.ISIS-WICCE.org.
Kadaga, Alitwala Rebecca. 2013. “Women’s Political Leadership in East Africa with
Specific Reference to Uganda”, paper presented at the Tenth Commonwealth
Women’s Affairs Ministers Meeting with a theme on Women’s Leadership for

Enterprise Dhaka, Bangladesh, 17-19 June 2013.
Kwesiga, Joy Constance et al. 2003. “Effectiveness of Affirmative Action Programmes
in Uganda, Tanzania and Eritrea”. British Council, Kampala.
Mama, Amina. 2005. “Editorial: Women Mobilised”. Feminist Africa 5.
Mama, Amina & Okazawa-Rey, Margo. 2008. “Editorial: Militarism, Conflict and
Women’s Activism”. Feminist Africa 10.
New Vision Newspaper 11 May 2011 and 6 June 2012.
Red Pepper Newspaper 15 July 2013 and 27 July 2013.
Tamale, Sylvia. 1999. When Hens Begin to Crow: Gender and Parliamentary Politics
in Uganda. Kampala: Fountain.
Tamale, Sylvia. 2003. “Fanning the Flames of Feminism in Uganda”. paper presented
on the occasion of celebrating ACFODE’s 18th anniversary, Kampala.
Wang, Vibeke. 2013. “Women Changing Policy Outcomes: Learning from Pro-Women
Legislation in the Ugandan Parliament. Women’s Studies International Forum 41.
Creating Women’s Leadership for Peace

and Security in the Greater Horn of
Africa: the limitations of capacity-
building as remedy for gender inequality
Cheryl Hendricks
Introduction: Contextualising Gender, Peace and Security

Post-Cold war global security shifts in the early 1990s created the space for
a rethink of the dominant conceptualisations of security. Key questions could
be raised in the search for a new security paradigm, namely, what is security,
security for whom, who are the security actors, and how should security be
provided? A growing consensus emerged on the skewed and limited focus
of traditional security and the need for thinking beyond the state to address
the security of peoples. Both Critical Security Studies and Feminist Security
Studies, critiqued the state-centred and gender-blind approaches to security,
critiques which found fertile ground in an international policy environment
under intense pressure to address violent intra-state conflicts that had
shattered any hope of a post-cold war peace dividend. The 1994 UNDP Report
therefore took up the critical analyses emanating from feminist and critical
security perspectives and introduced a perspective it named ‘Human Security’
(UNDP, 1994).
The Human Security approach defined security as ‘freedom from want,’
‘freedom from fear’ and ‘freedom to live in dignity’, thereby reorienting
security discourse to address the security of civilians in our societies. This
new conceptualisation of security, while it was far from ‘feminist’, created
an opening for those already challenging the invisibility of women, and
demanding gender analysis and documentation of conflict and the various
measures being taken to end conflict, restore peace, and rebuild conflict-
affected communities. Feminist scholars and gender activists were vociferous
in exposing the gendered nature of war and the exclusion of women from
peace and security structures and processes (Enloe, 1998; Tickner, 1995;
Hudson, 1998; Moser and Clark, 2001; Meintjies et al, 2002). They also
pointed to the unequal gender relations that precede conflict, intensify during
outbreaks of violence, and persist long after ‘peace’ has been declared. In
one of those rare historical moments, feminists scholars, gender activists and
policy makers all came together to jointly advocate for action to address the
abject situation of women in conflict situations. All this activism bore fruit
as it led to the adoption of the landmark United Nations Security Council
Resolution 1325 (adopted in 2000).1 This resolution calls for the increased
participation of women in peace and security decision-making, the prevention
of violence against women and the protection of women and girls against
sexual and gender-based violence.
Across the African continent, the same period saw a renewed interest in
setting out a pan-African agenda that would assist in resolving conflicts and
advancing development goals, in accordance with a new mantra: ‘African
solutions to African problems’ and President Thabo Mbeki’s declaration of
an African Renaissance. This revival in regionalism was pursued by African
leaders who proceeded to reconfigure the moribund Organisation of African
Unity (OAU) into the African Union (AU) in 2001. The AU’s Constitutive Act
committed the organisation to the promotion of gender equality and to
women’s empowerment. Gender mainstreaming was taken up by the AU as
a key tool for, among other things, the pursuit of regional commitments to
peace and security. UNSCR 1325 was therefore integrated into other gender
related frameworks, namely, the AU Protocol to the African Charter on
Human and People’s Rights on the Rights of Women (2003), the AU Solemn
Declaration on Gender Equality in Africa (2004) and the African Women’s
Decade (2010-2020). UNSCR 1325 is also a key component of the AU Policy
Framework on Security Sector Reform (2012) and was incorporated into the
2014 strategic vision for the continent, Agenda 2063. This ‘roadmap’ includes
calls for an Africa free from “gender-based violence as a major threat to
human security, peace and development” (AU, 2013). The majority of post-
conflict reconstruction and peacebuilding programs are currently failing
women on the continent as women continue to be subjected to the extremes
of violence and abuse. Gender mainstreaming in peace and security is being
promoted in an effort to address sexual and gender-based violence.
Despite enormous human and financial resources expended on gender
activism (advocacy and protests), capacity building (workshops and training),
the adoption of more gender related UNSC resolutions (such as 1820, 1888,
1889, 1960, 2106, 2122) and UNSCR National Action Plans (46 NAPS, 12
of which are located in African countries), women’s representation in peace
and security institutions and processes remain minimal and their vulnerability
in conflict and post conflict situations persists. Sexual and gender–based
violence, or threats of violence and other manifestations of inequality, still
characterise relations between men and women, boys and girls.
The reported decline in conflicts that has been achieved on the African
continent since 2000 has brought little peace and prosperity for women.
Currently, new forms of conflict are breaking out, some specifically targeting
women (as in the case of Boko Haram in Nigeria). However, because women
are predominantly framed as victims of sexual and gender-based violence, it
is assumed that they only need to be included into peace processes primarily
to address this particular issue, rather than allowing women to contribute
more broadly to the pursuit of the long-term transformations that are sorely
needed to bring about peace in war-torn countries.2 Conflict management
strategies to date have relied on bringing warring factions (whoever they are)
to the table to discuss how they will apportion the spoils of the state. Within
this political arena, all stakeholders are reluctant to include women. Analyses
and activism on gender, peace and security should therefore not be limited to
merely seeking to include women into inadequate existing peace and security
processes. Our analyses must take a broader view of the ways in which our
societies, politics and economies are being constituted and [re]configured by
violent conflict. These militarising processes appear to contradict the AU’s
declared pan-Africanist and gender equity agendas, both of which emphasise
unity, common destiny, non-discrimination and positive transformation.
Disconnects between the frameworks and initiatives being produced and
the lived realities of men and women are increasingly being recognised.3
This paper, contributes to an understanding of this disconnect by presenting
a retrospective analysis of a particular intervention that sought to increase
women’s participation in peace and security decision making on the continent.
Since this was an intervention I was engaged in, it is a personal account of
the assumptions and impact of our activism in the pursuit of enabling women
to participate in peace and security decision making.4 I revisit the successes,
challenges and unexpected consequences of the intervention to draw
attention to the misconceived assumptions about how change occurs, the
deeply entrenched nature of patriarchy, the power relations that inform and
shape interventions of this nature, and the inherent limitations of relying on

training and advocacy to deliver the much-needed structural transformations.
The Women’s Leadership for Peace and Security Project

The ‘Women’s Leadership for Peace and Security in the Greater Horn of Africa’
was a three year project that began in mid-2009 and ended in mid-2012. It
sought to “maximise the participation and contribution of women in national
and regional peace and security decision-making and political dialogue in
the greater Horn of Africa”.5 More specifically, the project wanted to create
“security fluency” amongst women leaders, by increasing women’s knowledge
and ability to converse on peace and security related issues. Secondly, it
set out to “secure a seat at the decision-making table” by advocating for
inclusion of women in peace negotiations and influencing peace and security
policies and practices. The project identified six impact areas:
• strengthened relationships between women leaders in the greater
Horn of Africa and national government/IGAD/AU/EU and other
diplomatic strategic partners;
• creating an enabling environment through the institutionalisation of
policy changes;
• increased knowledge and political skill to effect change;
• new faces and able voices for peace;
• enhanced mediation support functions played by women;
• strengthened women’s networking/organisational capacity for impact
on peace and security policy and practice.6
The greater Horn of Africa – which for the purposes of this project consisted
of Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somaliland, Somalia, Sudan and Uganda –
was selected for intervention because many of the countries in that region
were embroiled in violent conflicts at community, state and interstate levels.
Women were victims (being killed, maimed abducted, raped, displaced),
supporters (wives and/or mothers of combatants giving tacit support to the
conflict), actors (soldiers, rebels, cooks, intelligence gatherers) and detractors
(those who spoke out against the violence and actively campaigned for
peace) within all these conflicts. Yet, they were typically excluded from the
peace processes that were unfolding in the region. Consequently, their needs
and interests were not being tabled in the peace agreements, or in the post
conflict reconstruction and peacebuilding programs that emanated from the
negotiations. They remained marginalised from the deliberations that would

constitute the foundation of the [re]constructed states. The adoption of
UNSCR 1325 had already highlighted that this was a global phenomenon,
not restricted to African contexts. The Women’s Leadership project sought to
respond to the evident need to give practical expression to the resolution’s
aims, which are integrated into the gender equity frameworks of the African
Union.
Four organisations pooled their expertise as ‘partners’ on the project,
namely, the Club de Madrid, ISIS-WICCE, Strategic Initiative for the Horn of
Africa (SIHA) and the Institute for Security Studies (ISS). The Club de Madrid,
the lead partner, is a club of former Heads of State. They had the convening
power to facilitate women leaders to meet with representatives of national
governments and regional organisations. Isis the Women’s Cross-Cultural
Exchange7 is an international feminist organisation headquartered in Kampala.
ISIS-WICCE provided support services and brought their over 20 years of
experience and expertise on the issues confronting women in the region to the
project. The Strategic Initiative for the Horn of Africa8, a network of women’s
civil society organisations, identified the participants and they were initially
envisaged as the organisation that would co-ordinate the project given their
work with and access to the women in the region. The Institute for Security
Studies (ISS), based in Pretoria, is an applied policy research institution
working on peace and security issues on the African continent. My role, as
the representative of the ISS, was to assist in the conceptualisation of the
workshops, to provide input on the conflicts and to bring our organisational
experience with policy analysis and regional security mechanisms to the
project. Those of us conceptualising and implementing the project, believed
that by pooling our experiences and shared knowledge we could make a more
substantive impact to increase women’s participation than had hitherto been
the case.9 Our major objective was to build a knowledgeable (security fluent)
group of women leaders who could participate more meaningfully in peace
and security decision making in the greater Horn of Africa. Failing this, we
expected we would at least develop a cohort of women who could be drawn
upon for advice on peace processes and gender-sensitive security policy
formulation in the region.
The project targeted forty women who were identified as leaders from
civil society organisations in the seven countries. Drawn from the SIHA and
ISIS-WICCE networks, the women were diverse in terms of age, language,

types of organisations they worked for (human rights, development, media,
lawyers, education, and peace organisations located in both rural and urban
settings) as well as in their experiences of conflict and conflict management.
There were also tensions between the women themselves (e.g., from Somalia,
Somaliland and Puntland; Sudan and South Sudan were still at war at the
time). Although the focus was on 40 women over a period of three years, it
was envisaged that women leaders from larger organisations and networks,
would somehow pass on their acquired skills in accordance with the assumed
‘trickle down’ effect.
The methodology for creating security fluency and getting a seat at the
decision-making tables was predominantly through workshops which sought
to share information and build capacity and through ‘high level’ dialogues in
which stakeholders were engaged to both advocate for women’s inclusion and
to create exposure for the women leaders, i.e. training and lobbying. During
the period of the project we held ten workshops and high level dialogues
(cumulatively billed as ‘high level missions’) in Addis Abba (3), Djibouti (1),
Kampala (2), Nairobi (2), Somaliland (1) and Juba (1) (Club de Madrid, op
cit). Each mission targeted a specific country, although because Somalia and
Eritrea were deemed high risk, their project missions were held in Nairobi and
Addis Ababa respectively. Each mission consisted of a three-day workshop in
which the peace and security challenges were discussed, the gender relations
highlighted and the conflict management policies and programs analysed.
Each mission also included reporting (women recounted what transpired in
their country between missions) and a skills training component (on advocacy,
messaging, policy analysis, conflict resolution and early warning). The 3-day
missions also drew on a number of consultants, both international and local,
for both content and skills input.
At the end of the workshop the women leaders, who soon began to refer to
themselves as the G40, would develop resolutions and/or statements which they
would deliver to stakeholders (government, INGO’s and donor representatives) at
a high level dialogue the following day. These dialogues were chaired by former
Heads of State, such as Mary Robinson (Ireland), Valdis Birkavs (Latvia), Kim
Campbell (Canada), Kjell Bondevik (Norway) and Benjamin Mkapa (Tanzania).
The role of the former Heads of State was threefold, they drew participants, they
were assumed to have leverage on the stakeholders (for advocacy purposes) and
they could share their experiences with the G40.

The first high level dialogue in Addis Ababa, was chaired by Mary Robinson
and Kim Campbell (as members of the Club de Madrid), and jointly hosted with
UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). At this gathering the G40 were
able to engage with representatives of the AU Peace and Security Directorate,
Gender Directorate, UN, Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD),
ambassadors and other aid agency representatives. The purpose of this and
all the ensuing missions was to persuade government officials, donors and
representatives of intergovernmental organisations of the necessity for gender
sensitive and gender responsive security policy and practice, have them meet
the women leaders, hear their concerns and recommendations and to call on
them in their future programming. All the statements and recommendations
produced during the ten missions have been compiled into a booklet.
The UN Secretary General’s lament that the gender, peace and security
frameworks and initiatives were not yielding tangible results ring true for
this well-intentioned intervention as well. However, it is insufficient to simply
dismiss the intervention because it did not succeed in getting more women
to peace tables. There is a lot to be learnt from the limitations of capacity
building initiatives to produce the structural change necessary to give effect
to gender equality and it provides insight into why it is so difficult to achieve
the objectives encapsulated in the many resolutions and policy documents.
This project however had the unexpected outcome of building transnational
connections between women in this region, increasing an appreciation of the
commonalities of their conflicts and their gendered impacts, and of the need
to work collectively to achieve the continental agenda of gender equality and
peace and security.
Assumptions and Challenges

One of the early challenges that confronted the project related to internal
organisational and interpersonal issues between the partners, and these led
to the withdrawal of one of the main partners, SIHA. This is a common
problem of collaborative projects. Partners sharing common interests enter
into collaborative projects bringing different strengths, agendas, expectations
and values, most of which are not clearly spelt out. ‘Partners’ are not equal
in these collaborative efforts. It is therefore imperative to constantly reinforce
commonality of purpose and realign where necessary. Fortunately, and with
a remarkable sense of organisational maturity and dedication, the SIHA

board decided that their members would continue to be part of the project
irrespective of the organisation’s withdrawal. This incident highlighted the
need for greater transparency, the building of trust and organisational and
project flexibility as a fundamental part of partnerships and of working in
environments in which there is heightened vulnerability and distrust.
This project was conceived of and designed without the participation
of the women leaders themselves – they were viewed as ‘beneficiaries.’ We
assumed that because the project was in the interest of women and that we
– as the partners - knew what was needed we could go ahead and manage/
manipulate a process that would see ‘them’ enabled and seated at peace tables.
A hierarchical binary was unintentionally constructed: ‘us,’ the partners who
supposedly embodied the knowledge, experience, enlightenment and ‘them’
the beneficiaries who were deemed less knowledgeable about the security
issues in their own context, in need of guidance and of the opportunity to be
put in touch with national and continental peace and security brokers. The
G40 were constructed as women leaders, but essentially treated as learners. It
is worth noting that participatory project design is constrained in projects that
require a detailed funding proposal prior to the intervention. This apparently
insoluble factor may well explain the low traction of many external projects.
The first few missions therefore had many curious participants. Many were
reluctant to move away from their particular focus on development, human
rights or sexual violence, to now engage in discussion about human security,
peacekeeping, security sector reform, and the functioning of regional security
mechanisms. The women were equally hesitant to engage government officials
because they either did not think the exercise would be of use to them or they
associated it with a potential security risk. They were more familiar with the
donor community and some saw these ‘high level missions’ as an opportunity
to try to direct money to their own in-country projects. The G40 also came
to this project with their own agendas, which at times coincided and at times
conflicted with what the project sought to achieve, and it was not long before
they began to exert authority.
Many of the initial hurdles of the project were overcome. For example,
although the overall goals and methodology could not be changed,
participants were given the space to input into the types of skills they wanted
to acquire, the content of the workshops and the choice of local consultants.
This created a much stronger sense of ownership of the project. The G40
were not neutral bystanders to the conflicts, they knew what the security
issues were and what was needed to create peace and security, even if this
was not articulated in security jargon. Our initial assumptions were that if we
familiarised participants with the security jargon and linked this to gender
related concerns before putting them in touch with the regional and national
leaders, they would be enabled to participate in security decision making.
Many of the project beneficiaries succeeded in familiarising themselves with
‘security-speak’, understood the purpose and functioning of security bodies
and were able to articulate their own interests, needs and wants. This project
was undoubtedly a learning curve for many of the G40 were at a qualitatively
different level than when they first started in terms of their conceptualisation
of security, conflict management, advocacy and lobbying skills.
However, we learned that we were working with a false assumption about
why women were not participating in peace processes (broadly defined). It was
not their lack of knowledge and skills, their capacity to participate, or their
invisibility that were the inhibiting factors. Women are marginalised because
of the way in which peacemaking and peacebuilding have been structured.
Training and delivering capable women leaders to peace processes that had,
no real interest in their participation, despite the agreed to frameworks, proved
to be a rather futile exercise. Peace negotiations are habitually organised to
bring warring parties (usually rebels, warlords, political parties and government
representatives to the table) to generate ceasefire agreements, governments
of national unity and roadmaps to elections. Within this hyper-masculine
space in which ‘hard’ power prefigures who gets what, where and when,
gender is unwelcome, even as an add-on. Peacebuilding has largely come to
mean [re]constructing the same gender biased state and security institutions,
by many of the same people that had participated in their erosion in the
first place. Since peace agreements and peacebuilding programs make far-
reaching decisions about the future representation, structure and functioning
of a particular country and its peoples, it is understandable that women have
clamored for participation in them. Women have rightfully contended that
issues pertinent to them – gender based violence, dignity, representation,
protection, empowerment, access to resources among other things – have
to be dealt with when the blue print for the transition is being negotiated.
However, even the most dedicated women activists have not sought to change
the structure and orientation of the peace process itself or the institutions
involved. Rather, women have fought – perhaps rather simply – to be included
in the existing structures, assuming this would make them more accountable
to women. Events over the last two decades show that there is little or no
political will to bring about change, and that no amount of training will
open up the space for women’s participation, let alone the transformation of
gender relations. This may explain why between 1992 and 2011 only 4% of
signatories, 2.4% of chief mediators, 3.7% of witnesses and 9% of negotiators
were women (UN Women, 2010).
Those who have studied gender and development have long pointed to
the pitfalls of the gender mainstreaming approach, because it concentrates
on inclusion and capacity-building, both of which overlook the reality of
men’s resistance to women’s equal participation, and outright hostility to
anything that might be associated with feminism. However, given gender
mainstreaming’s late entry into the security discourse, it has taken nearly a
decade for activists in this field to come to very similar conclusions to that
reached by development studies in the late 1980s – partly because of the silos
in which the respective disciplines continue to operate. Noteworthy, too, is
Connell’s reflection that men are the gatekeepers for gender equality for they
control the very “economic assets, political power, and cultural authority, as
well as means of coercion, that gender reforms intend to change” (Connell,
2005:1802). She notes that part of men’s resistance to change can be
located in the ‘patriarchal dividend,’ the threats to their identity that occur
with change and the continuing ideologies that value male supremacy (in
religion, culture, organisational mission, etc.) (Connell, 2005: 1811). As far
back as the early 1990s, Cynthia Cockburn (1991) pointed out that men resist
organisational change either overtly or more subtly. Male resistance to gender
transformation in the security sector is bound to be far stronger for here
constructions of masculinity and gender power hierarchies are, in large part,
constituted through the images, discourses and practices that emanate from
the historically all male and masculinising environment of security institutions.
Feminist perspectives point to structural transformation as necessary for
the attainment of the broader and more meaningful participation of women
that is a prerequisite for sustainable peace and security. Currently, so few
women are in leadership positions in governing structures, political parties,
rebel groups, and intergovernmental organisations that they are not called
upon to participate in negotiations. At best, and if they push hard enough,

they may be allowed in to observe. Then, too, where women are included,
they generally negotiate in accordance with the interest of their respective
affiliations. A rare exception can be found in the success of South African
women with regard to the ending of apartheid. Here they succeeded in
making an impact because women from the different political parties joined
forces to advocate for the rights of women. Conflict management must entail
broader processes – such as national dialogues – in which the needs, concerns
and interests of the whole society can be meaningfully addressed. The current
format in which access to the means of violence is the determining factor
for inclusion and distribution of power and resources will never be gender
representative, gender sensitive or gender responsive. No amount of capacity
building will change this status quo. Therefore, women’s quest should not be
limited to mere inclusion into structures and processes that were not designed
to deal with the broader issues of equality and human security. It should rather
be to create alternative structures and processes that can be more responsive
to the needs of all and in which a pan-African spirit can enable cross-border
connections, important in the light of the regional dimensions of most of the
conflicts on the continent. This will take more than having women’s voices
heard and being put in touch with the right people. The right stakeholders
have heard the pleas of women many a time – they know the message
packaged in its varied forms. Messaging, lobbying, advocacy, are clearly not
sufficient to create the desired shift: women’s participation to address issues
of gender inequality and the security of women – requires nothing short of
quite dramatic change in the ideological, cultural and structural conditions
creating insecurities that are felt in particular ways and carried by women.
The Women’s Leadership for Peace and Security was in the end, just one
more project. As a project it had to meet set objectives within specific time
frames, and it came to an end after just 3 years. Understandably, the women
involved were reluctant to let go of the ‘partners.’ Even though the G40
organised themselves into a steering committee and drafted an action plan
and funding proposal to continue their work after the project, the fear was
that without the money they could not convene. Funds would be needed to
provide the structures and support required to communicate and advocate
across vast distances, and without this – given immediate challenges of their
own contexts – little would be achieved. Needless to say, their fears proved
correct. At the end of it all, it seems that we had inadvertently created new
forms of dependency, rather than empowering women as change agents.
Three years was much longer than most projects of this nature, but clearly
not sufficient for the G40 to stand on their own. Given the severity of their
situations, I suspect this would have been the same even if we had continued
for another three years.
The project, however, unexpectedly and despite its flawed assumptions
and conceptual limitations, did create a strong sense of unity and belonging,
camaraderie and sisterhood. It strengthened relations between women in
the region so that they began to see themselves as a regional movement on
gender, peace and security, which could reach out to similar movements across
the continent. The in-country exposure to the conflicts as well as continuous
updates created a much deeper understanding of the differences and
similarities of what they were experiencing and enabled a collective thinking
through of possible ways to deal with country and regional challenges. This
type of interaction is therefore beneficial for the pan-Africanist agenda we
hope to cultivate. Walking through the corridors of power and engaging
the power brokers also demystified these institutions and individuals located
within them. It exposed their weaknesses and lack of effective response. The
women leaders we involved could see where the deficiencies, lack of capacity
and ideological and conceptual bankruptcy were actually located. At the
first high level dialogue many women were tentative about engaging their
government representatives, as well as other stakeholders such as the UN,
AU and donor agencies. By the end of the three years they were much more
assertive and demanding of accountability. The project therefore added value
to participating women leaders personal growth and served as a means of
focusing attention on gender, peace and security in the region, but it was not,
nor could it be transformative.
To bring about transformative changes in the sphere of gender, peace
and security will require a multi-pronged approach that reaches all the way
from individual to international levels, and targets all peace and security
ideologies, structures and processes. The piecemeal manner in which we have
been dealing with gender, peace and security has allowed for a mushrooming
of frameworks that have minimal impact on the actual peace and security of
women. The renewed pan-Africanist agenda on the continent should heed to
the many calls for revisiting the current limiting institutional approaches to
gender, peace and security.
Endnotes
1. A point noted in a discussion I had with ‘Funmi Olonisakin and Awino Okech in
Pretoria in August 2014.
2. Also see Ayiera, E. 2010. “Sexual violence in conflict: a problematic international
discourse” who problematises the normalisation of violence in conflict situations.
http://agi.ac.za/journals
3. UNSC. 2013. Report of the Secretary General on “Women, Peace and Security”
and “Global Technical Review Meeting: Building Accountability for the
Implementation of Security Council Resolutions on Women Peace and Security” –
Background paper produced for the UN Women Conference, New York, November
2013.
4. I wish to thank Ruth Ochieng Ojiambo for brainstorming some of the ideas in this
paper with me.
5. http://www.clubmadrid.org/en/programa/project_in_action_1
6. Club de Madrid, Ibid.
7. www.isis-wicce.org
8. http://www.sihanet.org/
9. Although we worked for organisations, which were considered as the partners,
we, as the representatives of the organisations, were responsible for the
conceptualisation and implementation of the project and have to take
responsibility for both its success and its challenges.
References
African Union. 2013. “The Future We Want For Africa: AGENDA 2063”, agenda2016.
au.int . Accessed on 28 October 2014
Ayiera, E. 2010. “Sexual violence in conflict: a problematic international discourse”
Feminist Africa Vol 14
Cockburn, C. 1991. In the Way of Women: Men’s Resistance to Sex Equality in
Organizations, IRL Press
Connell, R.W. 2005. “Change Among the Gatekeepers: Men, Masculinities, and Gender
Equality in the Global Arena” SIGNS Spring
Enloe, C. 1998. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International
Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
Hudson, H. 1998. “A Feminist Reading of Security in Africa” in Solomon, H. and
Schoeman, M. (ed.). Caring Security in Africa, Theoretical and Practical
Considerations in New Security Thinking. Monograph 20. Pretoria: Institute for
Security Studies
Meintjies, S., Turshen, M. and Pillay, A. (eds.), 2002. The Aftermath: Women in Post-
Conflict Transformation, London and New York: Zed Books

Moser, C. and Clark, F (ed.). 2001. Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed
Conflict and Political Violence, London and New York: Zed Books
Tickner, A. 1995. “Introducing Feminist Perspectives into Peace and World Security
Courses” in Women’s Studies Quarterly: Rethinking Women’s Peace Studies Vol
23 No 3 and 4
UNDP. 1994. Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
UN Women. 2010. Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations: Connections
between presence and influence http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/
resources/03AWomenPeaceNeg.pdf accessed 4 September 2014
Ama Ata Aidoo’s Woman-Centred Pan-

Africanism: A reading of selected works
Delia Kumavie
Introduction
In the course of her writing career, Ghanaian writer Ama Ata Aidoo has
explored the challenges, hopes and dreams of African women as intricately
connected to Africa’s recent history, from the time of the continent’s
encounter with Europe, the ensuing trade in humans, followed by colonialism
and post-colonialism. From the earliest works to her most recent collection
of short stories, Diplomatic Pounds and Other Stories, Aidoo’s oeuvre is a
testament to her frank and direct exploration of African women’s experiences
in an increasingly globalising world.
This paper examines the pan-African perspective that informs Ama Ata
Aidoo’s body of work. It situates the author’s work within the seemingly
male-dominated pan-African discourse of the 1960s and beyond, by exploring
her construction of a woman-centred pan-Africanism through the creation
of strong female archetypes as well as her use of narratives that are both
trans-national and trans-temporal. Further, it argues that Aidoo’s literary work
constructs a pan-Africanism that privileges African women’s experiences.
From her earliest writings, Aidoo’s ability to take on issues that were deemed
“taboo” set her apart. She pioneered the excavation into Ghana’s past, present
and future by examining the experiences of women like Anowa, Esi, Sissie and
Cecille. Aidoo has attributed her fascination with Ghana’s unspoken past to her
own early encounter with a troubling reminder of slavery: the Cape Coast Castle.
In a conversation with Micere Githae Mugo, Aidoo, describing the emotions of
her encounter with the slave castles of Cape Coast, says: “I think I was kind of
traumatised and I couldn’t get the story out of my mind” (Mugo 2010: 34).
It is plausible that this event in the life of the young Aidoo was to inform
her engagement with the larger destiny and experience of Africans both on
the continent and its diasporas.
Born in 1940, to a royal family, at Abeadzi Kyiakor, a small town near

Cape Coast, Aidoo attended the prestigious Wesley Girls’ School and later the
University of Ghana. Aidoo attributes her feminist consciousness to growing
up among women whom she describes as strong because of their ability to
“negotiate their own existence” (Mugo 2010: 31). She further acknowledges
the influence of her mother’s ability to interrogate Ghanaian society and
question existing power relations and systems of authority (Mugo 2010: 33).
Such strong female archetypes emerge across the span of Aidoo’s work, in
characters like Esi in Changes, Sissie in Our Sister Killjoy and Anowa in the
play with the same title.
Further, Aidoo’s feminism emanates from her insistence that her feminist
consciousness is intrinsic to her pan-African ideals. Indeed, she posits that
coming of age during Kwame Nkrumah’s era, when pan-African ideals were
powerfully articulated, exerted a significant influence on her view of the
world. As a Junior Research Fellow at the Institute of African Studies at the
University of Ghana, between September 1964 and June 1966, Aidoo was part
of the flourishing debates of pan-Africanism. According to Vincent Odamtten,
at the University of Ghana the young Aidoo was exposed to the “radical
use of traditional oral forms and strategies” then being advocated by Efua
Sutherland and others (Odamtten 1994:10). Hence, exposure to the plethora
of critical debates on pan-Africanism, as well as socialist thought, among the
Ghanaian educated elite in the 1950s and 1960s, enabled Aidoo to: “avoid
a romanticisation of Africa’s past as some exotic golden age similar to that
evoked by the negritude movement led by writers as Camara Laye and Leopold
Senghor” (Odamtten 1994:10). In addition, these debates became important
for Aidoo’s literary re-visioning of the situation of the African woman in a
manner that “pull[ed] back the covers that concealed societal instability, flux,
inequitable relationships, structural duality, and social indeterminacy” which
constitute the “superficial layer” of contemporary nation-states in Africa
(Mikell 1997:31).
In his analysis of Aidoo’s pan-Africanism, the Ghanaian literary scholar
and poet Kofi Anyidoho argues that in poems such as “Images of Africa at
Century’s End,” Aidoo draws on the pan-African intellectual foundation to
advocate a “self-determining Pan-African agenda for the 20th century and
beyond” (Anyidoho 2012: 81). This critical awareness of Africa’s intellectual
history perhaps explains in part Aidoo’s need to confront Africa’s past head-on
in her plays, The Dilemma of a Ghost (1965) and Anowa (1969), and in her
collections of short stories No Sweetness Here (1970), The Girl Who Can
and Other Stories (1997), and Diplomatic Pounds and Other Stories (2012).
Aidoo’s conception of pan-Africanism is similar to that offered by Ngugi wa
Thiong’o, who locates pan-Africanism within the African diaspora and its
political movements such as Garveyism. According to Ngugi pan-Africanism
forms part of “re-membering visions and practices” that are responsible for
the “most visible results” of black struggles for civil and political rights and
political independence (Ngugi, 2009: 35). An example of this is the Pan-
African Congress in Manchester in 1945, which is directly accredited for
the return of Kwame Nkrumah and Jomo Kenyatta to Ghana and Kenya
respectively. Pan-Africanism remained a central part of an era characterised
by political struggles for independence and self-determination for all people
of African descent. Almost six decades after the independence struggles, the
concept of pan-Africanism alludes to the connection between Africa and its
Diasporas across national, transnational, intellectual and virtual spaces. These
are the kinds of connections that Ama Ata Aidoo’s extensive body of work
unearths and continues to explore.
Addressing the Women of Africa and the African Diaspora (WAAD)
conference, Aidoo asserts her feminism:
When people ask me rather bluntly every now and then whether I am a
feminist, I not only answer yes, but I go on to insist that every woman
and every man should be a feminist — especially if they believe that
Africans should take charge of African land, African wealth, African lives,
and the burden of African development. It is not possible to advocate
the independence for the African continent without also believing that
African women must have the best that the environment can offer. For
some of us, this is the crucial element in our feminism (1998: 47).
Aidoo expresses a vision of feminism for Africa that is both pan-African
and nationalist. It is a vision that can only be realised, Aidoo suggests, by
addressing the many struggles and obstacles that continue to affect the lives
of African women. Throughout her literary works she continues to engage
with African women’s lives through characters that exemplify the struggles
and triumphs of Africa and its women.
Nana Wilson-Tagoe (2007) points out the ways in which Ama Ata
Aidoo situates the African woman’s struggle within “larger issues of social,
cultural, and economic relations”, which in turn provides a “paradigm for
exploring national culture and agency”. Wilson-Tagoe’s analysis of Aidoo’s

work confirms that Aidoo’s feminist agenda is located within a pan-African
frame. Citing Anowa’s dream in Act Three of the play, where she dreams that
she is the woman whose progeny is being taken by the sea, Wilson-Tagoe
points out that the fact that Anowa remains childless in the play, suggest
that Aidoo deviates from the “teleological history of the nation” where the
African woman is figured as the bearer of the nation’s children (229). Aidoo,
according to Wilson-Tagoe, creates a “differentiated female history that
disrupts the homogeneity of national culture” (229). In other words, Aidoo
creates a narrative that centres women’s role and experiences. Similarly, Carole
Boyce Davies (1994), in her exploration of Aidoo’s Anowa, examines the
ways in which ideas of home or the lack thereof reveal pertinent concepts
about the marginality, constructions of the feminine, the subjectivity of the
African woman, and questions of witchcraft and madness. Both Wilson-Tagoe
and Davies analyse the ways in which Aidoo’s work actively engages with
African women’s experiences within national and global systems, developing
a discourse that spans national and regional boundaries.
Woman-Centred Pan-Africanism
In her 1969 play, Anowa, Aidoo takes us back in time to a period before
Europe’s colonisation of the continent. The play is set in the nineteenth
century, after the abolition of the slave trade and the signing of the Bond of
1844, between the British Crown in Cape Coast Castle and the chiefs of the
near-by communities.1 The play tells the story of a young woman who, after
refusing to marry several suitors, decides to marry a man of her own choosing.
The couple, after encountering opposition from Anowa’s family, decide to
leave their hometown of Yebi and start trading in animal skins, a life which
increases Kofi Ako’s wealth. It is when Kofi Ako embarks on the use of enslaved
labour that Anowa’s distress takes over, leading to its tragic climax. Anowa’s
resistance to Kofi Ako’s insistence on trading in humans, and her rejection of
the wealth Kofi Ako accumulates through this trade leads ultimately to their
tragic end. Through the character of Anowa, Aidoo explores an emerging pan-
African identity, forged out of the traumatic events of slavery. In other words,
Anowa is a play that negotiates both the temporal and spatial boundaries. It
re-imagines and recuperates the past, giving salience to women’s conflicted
and contradictory experiences of major historical upheavals.
Carole Boyce Davies describes this form of engagement with mobility and
migration in Aidoo’s play as “creative theorising” (1994: 44). She explains that
this form of theorising is a strategy that is central to Black women’s writing.
Extending Davies’ notion, I argue that Aidoo’s portrayal of women’s mobility
is central to her woman-centred pan-African perspective, through which she
writes women into a historical record that has erased their presence. Thus,
the agency of “creative theorising” (44) is a significant component of Aidoo’s
projection of feminism in Africa. Aidoo’s feminism emerges from a pan-African
historical legacy of African women that can be traced back to Cleopatra and
Yaa Asantewaa (1998: 39-40) . These women, according to Aidoo, anticipate
feminist discourse; similarly, Anowa’s presence in the nineteenth century
offers a woman-centred perspective on that history. In other words, Aidoo’s
re-creation of the past in Anowa theorises the physical and metaphorical
recuperation of the past to establish a dialogue among the past, present, and
future. For instance, in the context of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, Anowa’s
dream (Act Three) crosses both temporal and spatial boundaries:
I dreamt that I was a big, big woman. And from my insides were huge
holes out of which poured men, women and children. And the sea was
boiling and steaming. And as it boiled, it threw out many, many giant
lobsters, each of whom as it fell turned into a man or woman, but
keeping its lobster head and claws. And they rushed to where I sat and
seized the men and women as they poured out of me, and they tore them
apart, and dashed them on the ground and stamped upon them (71).
In this passage, Anowa associates herself with the traumatic experience of
the trans-Atlantic slave trade, which occurred in an earlier time in history. She
maps slavery and the slave trade onto her physical being as though she had
a personal experience of it. Anowa’s dream positions her at the heart of the
slave trade as the woman out of whom the men, women, and children are
born, and whose progeny are seized and destroyed. The sea both represents
Anowa’s loss and separation from the past and connects her to the roots of
pan-Africanism. Indeed, Anowa’s return to this imagery in her own moment of
personal crisis foregrounds the depth of the diasporic connection that Aidoo
pursues in her subsequent work.
In her reading of Anowa, Angeleta Gourdine posits that through the
character of Anowa, the victims of slavery are reclaimed and the “ghost from
the past” is re-awakened (Gourdine 37-38). Gourdine’s argument invokes a
kind of temporal transgression in which those who have been forgotten are
given a renewed presence and a means of expression. Anowa’s dream and her
insistence, as a child, on hearing about the “huge houses rising to touch the
skies” that were built by the “pale men” (69-71), I would argue, point to an
historical memory, one which is uncannily present and refuses to be forgotten.
In a later work, “She-Who-Would-Be-King (with an apology to Rudyard
Kipling)” (2002), Aidoo takes us to the future, precisely 25th May 2026, where
a woman has been elected President of a United Confederation of Africa. A
confederation, as a system of government, simultaneously acknowledges the
need to exceed the nation-state, but also to maintain the forms of autonomy
that the nation-state offers. It is significant that this potentially powerful
political entity is headed by a female president. Aidoo offers a feminist pan-
Africanism that precedes that of writers like Abdourahman A. Waberi, who, in
his 2009 satire In the United States of Africa, turns the world upside down
by creating a world in which a United States of Africa is the leading world
power, but still male-dominated. Aidoo’s pan-African narrative is more radical
in her vision of a woman president.
In temporal terms, Aidoo’s pan-Africanism is situated both in the historical
experience of Africa and its diaspora, but also in the imagination of Africa’s
future. Aidoo’s trans-temporality is a narrative strategy that allows her to
interrogate dominant hegemonic and androcentric constructions of Africa’s
past and future, to provide an alternative pan-African vision that foregrounds
women-centred issues.
In her most recent collection of short stories, Diplomatic Pounds (2012),
Aidoo presents yet another female-centred pan-African experience. Here we
encounter different African women who participate in the global system in
various ways. We meet world-travellers such as Cecille, Lucinda Mena Esi
Eshun and her friends, political refugees like Sibi, and educated African women
who migrate to pursue educational goals, such as Esaaba and Affiye. These
women depict the multifaceted experience of African women. As “flexible
citizens” or “global citizens” they represent a transgressive pan-African
discourse in which African women’s mobility challenges binaries of agency and
disempowerment that characterise African women’s experiences. It is useful to
look at these women’s mobility through Ong’s definition of transnationality,
which draws attention to the trans-, which, in the words of Ong, denotes
“moving through space or across lines, as well as changing the nature of
something” (2006: 4). Ong’s definition complicates the seeming “naturalness”

of nationhood and nationality, and posits a new and radically subversive space
where the transgressive discourses of mobility and migration can challenge
entrenched performances of national life. By acknowledging the existence of
such discursive and conceptual spaces of possibility, Aidoo’s work also offers
a viable and “liberatory” lens through which to read women’s mobility and
migratory flows as part of the pan-African experience of African women.
African women’s mobility and migration take on different forms in the
stories in Diplomatic Pounds. The story that lends its name to the title of the
collection, “Diplomatic Pounds” narrates one such experience of migration,
through Ghana’s diplomatic service. Through Cecille and her family, Aidoo
shows how women struggle to navigate this assumedly most privileged form
of migration. Having grown up in such a mobile and elite family, Cecille
as an adult develops the eccentric habit of collecting bathroom scales as a
compulsive attempt to manage and discipline a body that does not conform
to hegemonic standards for femininity. The bathroom scales, her mother
informs the psychiatrist, are in every room, even under the chairs in the living
room. The failure of the scales to control Cecille’s weight suggests a body in
rebellion, resistant to the normative prescriptions that do not accommodate
the actuality of African women’s bodies, or the changes that are undergone
with multiple migrations. Cecille’s obsessive need to record these pounds
suggests a need to discipline her migratory body as it spirals out of control.
Cecille, like the earlier Anowa, is transitioning from girlhood to into the new
spatial and temporal ‘scape’ of adulthood. Cecille’s transition into adulthood
is signified by her changing response to her mother. Whereas Cecille the child
acknowledged her mother’s scolding about her eating habits, the adult Cecille
challenges her mother by asking “what’s the point in being in the diplomatic
service if one isn’t going to explore the food of other people?” (2013: 34). It
is paradoxical that it is Cecille who is obsessed with the measurements, while
her mother tries to exercise control over her eating.
Like Anowa’s whose deteriorating mental state is diagnosed by the chorus
appropriately named “The-mouth-that-eats-salt-and-pepper,” Cecille’s mother
is worried about how Cecille’s condition will be diagnosed by the migrant
African community in London. For fear that Cecille will be considered mad,
her mother names Cecille’s condition as a “little nervous breakdown” and in
this way protects her daughter from community judgement by presenting a
milder interpretation of her daughter’s behavior accounted for by new forms

of displacement.
In “Recipe for a Stone Meal” Aidoo confronts this African women’s
negotiation of war and its effects. When war breaks out, Sibi is forced to leave
her life behind and attempt to run to safety with her children. She arrives
at a refugee camp, where she attempts to cook the food she receives from
the aid workers to feed her children. Sibi soon realises that the beans remain
hard no matter how long she boils them, and her children begin fainting
from hunger. Stories such as Sibi’s confirm Ada Uzoamaka Adzodo and Gay
Wilentz assertion that “Aidoo’s work is the site of the dilemmas of modern
African nations between the personal and the public, the individual and the
community” (1999: xix). Indeed Aidoo’s work creates a site for confronting
theories and experiences of African women across various national and
transnational spaces and time. At the same time, Aidoo’s works are sites
of conversations and co-existence of multiple narratives and experiences
that dominant theories and discourses tend to omit. Stories like Sibi’s in
Diplomatic Pounds are provocative narrative spheres through which the
dilemmas of African women are confronted.
Aidoo strategically refuses to associate Sibi’s experiences with a specific
war or with a specific geopolitical national space. This lack of specificity
suggests that the experience Aidoo narrates is not a singular unique narrative.
It is one that has its counterparts in many parts of Africa, and the world. It
is an experience that Aidoo chooses to narrate in sparse detail to mirror the
fragmentary nature of traumatic memory. When Sibi and her children take to
the “highway”, it is after witnessing the brutal murder of relatives and the
violent spread of war. The “highway” does not provide a space of solace and
possibility for Sibi. On the contrary: it leads to the United Nations-run refugee
camp where despair flourishes and death looms. It is a space that has been
replicated across the continent. It is part of the experiences of the continent,
albeit one that is often left out in the discussion of pan-Africanism.
Memory remains an important component of pan-Africanism in
Diplomatic Pounds. Indeed pan-Africanism as a movement draws on the
memory of a homeland and of a people displaced throughout history. The
acts of remembering and re-membering are important practices in Aidoo’s
pan-Africanism. Thus, when we first encounter Sibi, she is attempting to
re-member fragments of her deracinated past. She says:
Her mother hails from a matrilineal clan, her father from a patrilineal, at
just over thirty-five years in the prime of life, ‘reasonably good-looking,’
‘strong’ – her description of herself for herself – a qualified primary
school teacher, married to another qualified school teacher and now
public schools all over the country are back at work… So what exactly is
she doing here? (2012: 61).
Sibi attempts to evoke memories of her past to authenticate and establish
a connection to her life before the war. The events and details that Sibi
remembers point to the ways in which she chooses to account for her pre-
war life. It also points to Sibi’s attempt to re-establish her identity through
dis-membering and re-membering the events of her past. Yet it is from this
past life, too abruptly abandoned, that Sibi derives her sense of place within
the world. Sibi’s self-definition emerges out of her ability to connect to her
lived experiences of the past. Unlike Anowa, who crosses temporal boundaries
to account for her community’s “forgotten” memory of the slave trade. Sibi’s
transgression of time through memory is to affirm her sense of self, and her
identity roots her to a specific social locality.
Mobility and migration are essential components of Aidoo’s form of
woman-centred pan-Africanism. Saskia Sassen suggests that migration and
globalisation are movements that are “embedded in larger social, economic,
and political processes,” such as colonialism or the existence of a diasporic
community (55). Europe’s complex political and historical involvement in
Africa makes it an important destination for African migrants. In “Rain”,
“Outfoxed”, and “No Nuts”, we meet African women who migrate to Europe
to pursue their educational ambitions. This pattern illustrates the historical,
economic and political relationship between Europe and peoples of African
descent. It also illustrates that the colonial relationship between Europe
and Africa continues to influence personal and political decisions till date.
Similarly, the family is a significant factor in African women’s negotiation of
mobility and migratory experiences as depicted by Aidoo. In “Rain” we find
that Affiye’s mobility is made possible because of her uncle’s “successful”
migration. This form of mobility and migration is replicated by many of African
descent. These intellectuals of African origin transgress multiple boundaries to
present their research to various groups of people outside Africa. In the course
of their presentation, these intellectuals confront groups of African migrants
who are critical of such intellectual undertakings. The irony here is not that
the migrants are critical of intellectual engagements about the continent, but
that these conversations about Africa are happening in Europe (or the United
States) and not Africa. The narrator points this out when she muses,
If anyone had thought there was anything odd about such an event
taking place somewhere in Europe instead of somewhere in Africa, they
didn’t say so any time before, during or after the retreat. In any case,
if they had, they would have exposed their own ignorance. For over
centuries, all sorts of meetings, conferences and other caucuses crucial
to Africa and her people had been organised outside that continent and
most especially in Europe (2012: 85).
The narrator rightly criticises the tradition in which intellectual and political
engagement that concern the African continent are undertaken in Europe.
Indeed since the Berlin Conference of 1884, some of the most crucial of
Africa’s economic and political policies have been enacted in Euro-American
localities, often without the contribution of Africans living and working on
the continent. These intellectual engagements about the continent that take
place in Europe are paralleled with Affiye’s negotiation of her migration and
mobility, ending with her return to Ghana to assist and support her family.
At the same time, due to the dispersal of Africans across the world, it remains
important that these discussions are taking place in various localities.
Aidoo’s conception of pan-Africanism as female-centred leads her to
question the homogenous understandings of the term.
This variability is reiterated across her literary work through women like
Eulalie Yawson in The Dilemma of a Ghost, to Anowa’s dream which connects
her body to Ghana’s history of slavery; to Sissie’s commentary on her journey
to Europe and her friendship with Marija; and more recently in the plethora of
female characters in Diplomatic Pounds who transgress boundaries of space
and time and social constrictions. Some have described Aidoo as “the mouth
of those women who have no mouth to speak for themselves” and as “the
spokesperson for Africa” (Azodo, 1999: 401). Though such broadly applicable
acclamations tend to overlook the specificity of Aidoo’s work, I believe that
the many lessons that Aidoo’s work imparts make her a voice for a feminist
pan-Africanism.
Endnotes
1. The Bond of 1844 and its legal significance in Ghana’s history has been contested
by J.B. Danquah in “The Historical Significance of the Bond of 1844”. Danquah
argues that the considering the Bond of 1844 as a kind of “magna carta” is false
because the wording of the document does not grant the British Crown political
control over the communities described in the bond as “adjacent” to Cape Coast
Castle.
References
Adams, A. 1993. “Claiming Her Authority From Life: Twenty Years of African Women’s
Literary Criticism. In: Dieter-Riemenschneider and Frank Schulze-Engler, F. eds.
1993. African Literatures in the Eighties. Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V., pp. 165-172.
Adams, A. V. 2012. (ed) Essays in honour of Ama Ata Aidoo at 70: A Reader in
African Cultural Studies. Banbury, Oxfordshire, UK: Ayebia.
Aidoo, A. A. 1971. No sweetness here. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Aidoo, A. A. 1993. Changes. New York: Feminist Press at the City University of New
York.
Aidoo, A. A. 1994. Our Sister Killjoy. London: Longman.
Aidoo, A. A. 1995. The dilemma of a ghost. Harlow: Longman
Aidoo, A. A. 1998. “The African Woman Today”, in: Nnaemeka, O. ed. 1998. Sisterhood,
Feminisms and Power. Trenton: Africa World Press.
Aidoo, Ama Ata. Anowa. Ed. Martin Owusu and Benjamin Okyere Asante. Harlow
England: Pearson Education, 1965(2003). Print.
Aidoo, A.A. 2012. Diplomatic Pounds. Oxford, UK: Ayebia.
Aidoo, Ama Ata. 2000. “She Who Would Be King” in Anyidoho, K., & Gibbs, James.
Eds. 2000..FonTomFrom : Contemporary Ghanaian Literature, Theatre and
Film. (Matatu; no. 21- 22). Atlanta: Rodopi.
Anyidoho, K. 2012. “Literary Visions of a 21st Century Africa: A Note on the Pan
African Ideal in Ghanaian Literature”, in Adams, A. ed. 2012. Essays in Honour of
Ama Ata Aidoo at 70. Banbury: Ayebia Clark.
Azodo, A. U. and Wilentz, G. A. 1999. Emerging Perspectives on Ama Ata Aidoo.
Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
Boyce Davies, C. 1994. Black Women, Writing, and Identity. London: Routledge.
Certeau, M. D. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
Gourdine, Angeleta KM. “Slavery in the Diaspora Consciousness: Ama Ata Aidoo’s
Conversations.” In Azodo, A. and Gay Wilentz eds. 1999. Emerging Perspectives
On Ama Ata Aidoo. Trenton, NJ : Africa World Press, 1999. 27-41. Print.
Micere Mugo. 2010. A Conversation: Ama Ata Aidoo with Micere Mugo. Interview,
Brown University, December 2010.
Odamtten, V. O. 1994. The Art of Ama Ata Aidoo. Gainesville: University Press of
Florida.
Ong, Aihwa. Flexible Citizenship: the Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham:
Duke UP, 2006. Print.
Ngugi wa Thiong’o. 2009. Something Torn and New. New York: Basic Civitas Books.
Sassen, Saskia. Globalization and Its Discontents: Essays on the New Mobility of
People and Money. New York: New, 1998. Print.
Wilson-Tagoe, N. 2007. “Representing Culture and Identity: African Women Writers
and National Culture”, in Cole, C. M., Manuh, T. and Miescher, S. F. eds.
2007. Africa after Gender? Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Archives and Collective Memories:

Searching for African women in the
pan-African imaginary1
Brenda Nyandiko Sanya and Anne Namatsi Lutomia
Introduction
In July 1985, Nairobi hosted a meeting of over 14,000 women at the United
Nations’ Third World Conference on Women.2 Domestic and international
women’s rights activists held a concurrent meeting, dubbed Forum 85.
Organised by non-governmental organisations, Forum 85 served as a space for
activists to oppose capitalist exploitation, patriarchal subjugation and racist
oppression, and to build coalitions and develop more nuanced critical views
of patriarchy, capitalism and racism in postcolonial and post-slavery societies.
The event brought women from all over the world to Kenya. Notably, African
women contributed directly to its planning, an action that resulted in a shift
in understandings of power within the global women’s rights movement.
Scholars and activists who were present spoke about Nairobi as momentous
not only because “it was here, unfettered by formal responsibilities, that
feminists openly expressed ideas, analysed experiences, and set forth
expectations for the future” (O’Barr et al, 1986: 584), but also because of the
inclusion of women from Kenya and the African continent. The forum was
significant, too, for the embrace of transnational black feminist frameworks,
and for disrupting (if only momentarily) the notion that women’s roles in
national building were solely domestic and reproductive.
Yet whereas Kenyan women were central thirty years ago in championing
global discourses and strategies towards gender justice and equity, there is
limited archival documentation and scholarship specifically about feminism in
Kenya. Some scholars have been able to excavate Kenyan women’s histories
and to thereby consider questions of gender politics and agency: scholars
such as Kanogo (1987), writing on the Mau Mau Rebellion, Shaw (1995),
studying gender, class and racial issues in Kenya, and Hay (1976), who
conducted an economic survey among Luo women in colonial Kenya. Gender

has been considered as a category of analysis by other Africanists writing
about Kenya who posed questions relating to gender to their respondents
in the field (e.g. Oruka, 1990; Cohen and Odhiambo, 1989). However, in our
view, Kenya’s participation in African feminist academic spaces and networks
still lags behind that of other countries such as Ghana, Nigeria, Uganda, and
South Africa. Furthermore, as is the case with many African nations, much of
the documentation and circulation of women’s lived histories has also been
limited to studies focusing on women along ethnic lines or in terms of their
urban or rural locations, more in keeping with a colonial archive.
We see the archive as a location for women to document their lived
experiences, and we argue that archiving has great potential to build more
inclusive records, histories, and also futures, bringing the “margin to the
centre” (hooks 2000). The archive has traditionally been a formal space
under the purview of the state and other official institutions. However, we
argue that in the 21st century, cultural production through visual and digital
devices (e.g. community based work with metadata, performance) that allow
for localised inventions and participation can constitute a legitimate archive
too, and thus has the potential to advance various forms of democratisation
by broadening the knowledge base (Maingi, 2011; Sanya, 2013). “History,” of
course, privileges certain narratives and silences others. Therefore questioning
the content and circulation of the history of the nation becomes a necessary
endeavour. Seeing that women are often rendered invisible in conventional
history-making projects, we envision grassroots, national, regional and
continental women’s visibility and archiving in e-spaces (Radloff, 2013) as
well as visual/digital projects.3 Here we would especially advocate attempts
to (re)member and (re)consider women’s involvement in national histories
that do not privilege imagined and idealistic visions of ‘African womanhood’
– visions of the kind critiqued by novelists such as Ama Ata Aidoo (whose
work is discussed by Delia Kumavie in this issue), Mariama Ba, Okwiri Oduor,
Margaret Ogola and Nawal el Saadawi, among many others.
Collective Memories: Shaping National and Transnational

Imaginaries
The notion of “collective memory” can be understood as the continuous
construction of memories through shared cultural images, stories, and
conceptions of the past (Halbwachs 1992). In questioning the ways in which

historians conceptualise events in national histories, the connections between
memories of individuals and the social collective still remain relevant and
enlightening. While archives and collective memories are not the same, they
certainly are connected. Langford explains, for instance: “a photographic
album is a repository of memory … [and in turn is] an instrument of social
performance” (2006: 223). Langford’s examination of the relocation of
photograph collections from private spaces to the public realm illustrates how
objects (in this case photographs) create new “remembrance environments”
(2001; 2006). Photographs (and arguably other accessible archival documents)
thereby operate as “constituents of collective memory” and as “historical
markers” that allow individuals to find historical and fictive connections
through which they can “imagine” where they were located in a larger
community (Brennen and Hardt, 1999:7). As such, the archive is not a
necessarily a physical building that contains historical documents or records.
Rather it is any location, including individual homes and virtual spaces, where
historical records of a place, institution or people reside.
The collective memories shared by elders, griots, and in folk tales also
make up the archive. Simply put, histories of African communities are not
only found in libraries, museums and national archives, whether on the
continent, in former colonial metropoles and in other sites around the
world. They are also located in photographs on the walls, in magazines, in
cultural, political and satirical comics, in graphic novels, in text messages, in
comments on Facebook,4 YouTube and Twitter feeds, and in blog posts. The
archive is vast, exhaustive, dynamic, partly inaccessible, unsorted and, most
importantly for our argument, it includes narratives of a broad spectrum of
the lives and experiences of African women and men. Virtual and dynamic,
the archive is also is not bound by the the nation-state. This insight allows
us to pose questions about the location and figuration of African women
in global imaginaries. From international aid discourses to academic texts,
historical documents and popular culture, for instance, we most often find
African women represented in the following tropes: submissive, wise, strong,
hardworking, resilient, abused, circumcised, oppressed, poor, sick, angry,
hungry, needy and illiterate.
Yet a reconstituted archive allows for a dismantling of such traditional and
constrictive assumptions about African women. Here, interventions by queer
of colour critiques are productive in establishing “a capacious notion of the

archive by locating the quotidian within the messy physical, symbolic, and
emotional arrangements of objects, bodies, and spaces” (Manalansan 2014:
94). With this, there can be an increased visibility of the women whose role in
nation-building has been ignored or erased, as has their diversity. For example,
Kenyan Swahili women have been involved historically in coining sayings on
kangas or lesos in exchange for money or cloth.5 However, these sayings are not
considered part of a national archive but rather as part of the commodities in
question. Indeed after women submit their sayings to the cloth manufacturers,
their identities are unknown and unnamed. The ability to contribute to kanga
production provides women with a potential avenue to project their opinions
and feelings, and to resist or flout patriarchal norms. Their sayings on kangas
could therefore be recorded and valued as historical moments because they
emerge from the conditions and contexts of the women’s daily lives.
A second example is the work done by Weavers, a woman-only space
in which Kenyan women self-define, support and affirm their life goals,
ambitions and histories (contributors to this issue). The Weavers are mobilising
collectively to remember, narrativise, and reflect on their experiences. In so
doing they are creating spaces such as “#weaving16” which generated a
collection of voices and stories, an archive-making world-shaping project by
Kenyan women” (Keguro, 2014). Explicitly and inclusively defined, the group
of women rely on an ethical practice of affirming, archiving and amplifying
each others’ voices and work. Using the metaphor of weaving to generate
theory, memory and personal narrative, the group explains:
The language of “weaving” is a foundational claim to our cultural
traditions and legacies of women working and speaking together, of
collaboration and co-operation. We claim not any one method or fabric,
but the practice of weaving our labour and weaving the imagination of
women together, so as to make something new.
In collectives like Weavers, then, women “showcase the vexed relationships
between objects, bodies, narratives and desires… as the quotidian becomes
the fuel for animating capacious engagements with… ‘impossible subjects’
of history” (Manalansan 2014: 95). Such collectives challenge the privileging
of patriarchal archives and archival practices; they challenge the “epistemic
violence” that is the routine silencing and erasure of marginalised women
(Spivak 1998; Dotson 2011).
As individuals and a collective, women on the African continent have

also joined the “struggle to produce new and relevant knowledge in the 21st
century” (Mama and Barnes, 2007:1) through research and documentation
work, in efforts to redress inequality and ignorance about women’s lives.
In a previous issue of Feminist Africa, Amina Mama points out that “the
persistence of patriarchal hegemony across the African region has stimulated a
visible proliferation of feminist scholarship and strategy, yet this is only rarely
brought for collective reflection and analysis” (2002:1). Mama’s argument
is important here as she raises the question of representation and inclusion.
Similarly, Mama and Barnes write that “the transformative ideals of higher
education remain relevant and attractive, while the condition of production of
knowledge have remained deeply gendered in ways that have proved difficult
to change” (2007: 4). As such Mama and Barnes (2007) point to the gains
that have been made in including women in academic work while at the
same time showing what challenges persist and the gap between knowledge
production and circulation.
There are a growing number of organisations, scholar-activists and gender
institutes such as the African Gender Institute at the University of Cape
Town and Women and Law in Southern African Research and Education
Trust (WLSA) that have been established to develop greater African-centred
intellectual equality, including by combining academic teaching, training
and research with the training of activist research networks. However, there
is continued need for individuals,6 universities and non-governmental
organisations to further create spaces such as conferences, journals, gender
studies centres and institutes, for even greater knowledge formation and
dissemination. As they are consolidated, such archives cannot be thought to
simply complete national and transnational archives and projects. They can be
revolutionary in disrupting how women in Africa are at all imagined.
Conclusion
In this standpoint, we have called for the re-conceptualisation of African
archives towards a more expansive view, which includes traditional and non-
traditional texts and objects, and reveals and opens up spaces while filling in
the gaps that exist in national histories. Such a reconfigured archive would
feature not only conventional collections such as national archives, museums,
libraries but also alternatives ones, including photographs mounted on walls,
kept in family albums and, more recently, sent as SMS or circulated via
Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and blog posts. This vast archive would represent
a broader spectrum of the lives and experiences of Africans, and thereby
reconstitute our collective memory and sense of self. And indeed, as we write,
more and more Kenyan feminists are blogging, creating online platforms that
document their everyday lives, and creating music that embraces the past
but also reveals the dynamism of the present. Kenyan women are speaking
out through newspaper and journal articles, too. Additionally, scholars like
Wangui wa Goro have highlighted an archiving and documenting of Kenyan
women’s histories, largely collected in the 1980s and 1990s, that has yet to
be published. That such work exists at the grassroots and is in many ways
invisible is significant and telling. It vividly demonstrates that archiving our
necessarily multiple experiences in Africa cannot happen through top-down
perspectives and actions but requires integration in our education system,
oral histories, popular culture, and formal and informal archival sites such as
libraries and museums to name a few. We envisage archiving as a resource for
research that not only shifts collective memories but influences what is taught
in classrooms, that is to say our collective futures.
Endnotes
1. This work owes much to the close reading and thoughtful criticism of Teresa
Barnes, Keguro Macharia, and T.J. Tallie. Many thanks also to Michael Brün,
Bryce Henson, Relebohile Moletsane, Abigail N. Sanya, and Crystal Rizzo, for
their critical feedback and clarifying questions and comments. We also benefitted
from discussions in Chantal Nadeau’s queer theory and methods course and
insightful feedback given by Cynthia Dillard, Gesa Kirsch, and Assata Zerai at The
10th International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry and the 5th Annual Center for
Writing Studies Graduate Student Symposium where excerpts were presented.
Finally, many thanks to our generous issue editors, Amina Mama and Hakima
Abass for their patience and crucial feedback, which consistently re-affirmed our
desire to locate this essay on the continent even though we write from diasporic
locations. While we were making final edits to this manuscript, the brilliant and
engaging Kenyan folklorist and publisher, Asenath Bole Odaga, passed away. This
work builds upon an archive that she generated in her close to five decades of
publishing African literature.
2. The UN has organised four world conferences on women, which took place in
Mexico City (1975), Copenhagen (1980), Nairobi (1985), and Beijing (1995).
Beijing was “followed by a series of five-year reviews” (United Nations Entity for
Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, 2014).
3. We concur with Said’s notion of an eclectic archive, where he writes: “the book
culture based on archival research as well as general principles of mind that once
sustained humanism as a historical discipline have almost disappeared. Instead of
reading in the real sense of the word…distracted by the fragmented knowledge
available on the internet and in the mass media” (Said, 1979, p. xx).
4. Facebook groups such as The Nigerian nostalgic project – Pre-Nigeria, as well
as The Nigeria nostalgic project 1960-1980, and The Nigerian nostalgic project
1980-2000 provide platforms for Nigerians to nostalgically recollect moments in
history and in so doing, they insert personal narratives into the national narrative
though photographs, local advertisements and brief descriptions. These then
provide a communal and collaborative public archive.
5. These multi-purpose fabrics used in everyday life among many Kenyan
households often have proverbs and sayings generated by women. The saying
or proverbs require cultural knowledge as the interpretation is informed by the
context and existing relationships.
6. Nkiru (2002) extensively chronicled her efforts in using information technologies
to promote African scholarly production and communication by establishing
several online journals.
References
Brennen, B & Hardt, H 1999, Picturing the past. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
Cohen, D. & Atieno Odhiambo, ES 1989, Siaya, the historical anthropology of an
African landscape. London: J. Currey.
Dotson, K 2011, ‘Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing’ Hypatia,
Vol. 26, No. 2, pp.236-257.
Halbwachs, M 1992, On collective memory, Trans L. Coser University of Chicago Press,
Chicago, IL.
Hay, M 1976, Luo ‘Women and Economic Change During the Colonial Period’, in
Women in Africa: Studies in Social and Economic Change, eds N Hafkin & E Bay,
Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA, pp.87-110.
Hooks, B 1989, Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black, South End Press
Boston, MA.
Hooks, B 2000, Feminist theory: From margin to centre, Pluto, London.
Kanogo, T 1987, Squatters and the roots of Mau Mau, 1905-63, J. Currey, London.
Keguro_ [@Keguro_]. (2014, December 11). #Weaving16 has been a collection of
voices and stories, an archive-making, world-shaping project by Kenyan women
[Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/Keguro_/status/542929226622828544
Langford, M 2001, Suspended conversations: The Afterlife of Memory in Photographic
Albums, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal, Que.
Langford, M 2006, ‘Speaking the Album: An Application of the Oral-Photographic

Framework’, in Locating Memory: Photographic Acts, eds A Kuhn & K McAllister,
Berghahn, New York, NY pp.223-246.
Maingi, G 2011, ‘The Kenyan Constitutional Reform Process: A Case Study on the
Work of FIDA Kenya in Securing Women’s Rights’, Feminist Africa 15 Legal Voice,
pp.63--81.
Mama, A 2002, Editorial, Feminist Africa 1 Intellectual Politics, pp.1-8.
Mama, A. & Barnes, T 2007, ‘Editorial: Rethinking Universities I, Feminist Africa 8
Rethinking Universities I. pp. 1-7.
Manalansan, M. F 2014, The “Stuff” of Archives Mess, Migration, and Queer
Lives, Radical History Review Vol. 2014, No. 120, pp. 94-107.
Mutongi, K 2007, Worries of the Heart: Widows, Family, and Community in Kenya.
Chicago: University of Chicago.
Nkiru, N 2002, ‘Africaresource. com: Bridging the digital divide’, African issues, 30(1),
pp.81--85.
O’Barr, J., Tinker, I, Hultman, T, Gaidzanwa, R, Guy-Sheftall, B, Callaway, H, Basu, A
& Bernstein, A 1986, ‘Reflections on Forum ‘85 in Nairobi, Kenya: Voices from the
International Women’s Studies Community’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture
& Society, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.584-608.
Oruka, H 1990, Sage Philosophy: Indigenous Thinkers and Modern Debate on
African Philosophy. 1st ed. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Radloff, J 2013, ‘Editorial: Feminist engagements with 21st-century communications
technology’, Feminist Africa 18 e-spaces: e-politics, pp.1-12.
Ricœur, P 2004, Memory, history, forgetting, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Said, E 1979, Orientalism, Vintage Books, New York, NY.
Sanya, B N 2013, Disrupting patriarchy: An examination of the role of e-technologies
in rural Kenya, Feminist Africa 18 e-spaces: e-politics, pp.12-24.
Shaw, C 1995, Colonial Inscriptions: Race, Sex, and Class in Kenya, University of
Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
Spivak, G 1998, ‘Can the subaltern speak?’, in Marxism and the interpretation of
culture, C Nelson & L Grossberg. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 271-313.
Standpoint | 77
When Exploitation is Camouflaged as

Women Empowerment: The case of
Malawi’s first female president Joyce Banda
Juliet Kamwendo & Gregory Kamwendo
Introduction
Despite many years of struggles to get out of the malaise of underdevelopment,
the African continent is still trapped in conditions that dehumanize and
marginalize a large segment of the population, particularly women. The
motivation for writing this paper stems from our realization that exploitation
of women in politics can sometimes be camouflaged as “women’s
empowerment”. This is illustrated by the experience of Malawi’s first female
president, Joyce Banda, who was initially used instrumentally to advance
President Bingu wa Mutharika’s ambition for a second presidential term
of office. Once Mutharika had been elected, Joyce Banda was harassed,
castigated and marginalized and ultimately fired from the ruling party in
2010. Despite this, the constitution allowed her to stay on as vice state
president, much to the disappointment of President Bingu wa Mutharika,
who had hoped that removing her from the ruling party would create
room for his younger brother, Peter Mutharika, to run as the ruling party’s
presidential candidate in 2014. However, Bingu wa Mutharika died suddenly
of cardiac arrest in 2012, and in accordance with the constitutional provision,
Joyce Banda was sworn in as president to complete the presidential term of
office. In the ensuing presidential elections of May 2014, Joyce Banda lost
to Peter Mutharika. Joyce Banda, while not elected in her own right, was
Malawi’s and the Southern African Development Community’s first female
president, and second female president on the African continent. In this paper
we critically examine what this case reveals about African politics, noting that
both SADC and the African Union have expressed commitments to gender
equality in politics, and further declared 2015 the year of the African Woman.
At the Fourth World Conference on Women held in Beijing in 1995, there
was a very deep concern with issues related to women in power and decision-
making. To this end, the Beijing Platform for Action came up with two
goals. The first goal was to take practical measures to ensure women’s equal
access to and full participation in power structures and decision-making.
The second goal was to increase women’s capacity to participate in decision-
making. These two noble goals are echoed, for example, in Malawi’s policy
on gender (Malawi Government, 2008), in the Southern African Development
Community (2008) and the African Union (2009). As Tenthani notes:
Mutharika’s decision to appoint her as his running mate for the
2009 elections surprised many in Malawi’s mainly conservative, male-
dominated society – which had never before had a female vice-president
(Tenthani, 2012).
By choosing Joyce Banda as his presidential running mate, Bingu wa
Mutharika could be seen to be advancing women’s role in decision making
but skeptics argue that the move was disingenuous. Mutharika’s move
was actually instrumental – designed to draw votes from women to take
advantage of their numerical strength on the voters’ register. In what follows,
we examine the political landscape within which Joyce Banda’s political career
can be situated and the gender dynamics of her experience discussed.
Since independence in 1964 up to 1993, Malawi was a one-party state with
gross abuse of human rights. Dissatisfaction with authoritarian rule eventually
led to a referendum in which Malawians were asked to choose either a multi-
party system of government or the continuation of the one party state system.
On 14 June 1993, two-thirds of the Malawians voted in favor of multi-party
democracy. On 17 May 1994, Bakili Muluzi of the United Democratic Front
(UDF) was elected state president of Malawi (Posner, 1995; Kaspin, 1995).
Bakili Muluzi ruled for two consecutive presidential terms from 1994 to 2004.
It is during the UDF rule that Joyce Banda showed her political ambitions by
serving as a Member of Parliament (MP) for Zomba-Malosa constituency. She
also served as a cabinet minister in more than one ministry. From May 2004,
president Bingu wa Mutharika took power from Bakili Muluzi within the same
Party (UDF). However after some disagreements, Bingu wa Mutharika broke
away from the UDF and formed the Democratic Peoples’ Party (DPP), leading
to the migration of some UDF members of parliament to the new party. Joyce
Banda was one of these MPs.
Prior to becoming the first female Vice President of Malawi, Joyce Banda
had a track record of fighting for women’s empowerment, she also served
as Minister of Gender, Child Welfare and Community Services before being
Standpoint | 79
appointed Minister of Foreign Affairs. As Minister of Gender, Child Welfare

and Community Services, she worked hard to enact the Domestic Violence
Bill. She also designed the National Platform for Action on Orphans and
Vulnerable Children and Zero Tolerance Campaign against Child Abuse. In
2009, President Bingu wa Mutharika won the hearts of many people who
believe in gender justice when he chose Joyce Banda as his presidential
running mate. The choice of a female presidential running mate extended
Mutharika popularity and praise. The move was also seen to be in line with
the National Gender Policy (Malawi Government, 2008), the Constitution
of Malawi, the SADC Protocol on Gender (Southern African Development
Community, 2008) and the African Union (2009). Both Mutharika and his DPP
won the elections, resulting in Mutharika and Joyce Banda taking office as
president and vice-president respectively. History had been made. For the first
time in Malawi’s history, the country had a woman as a vice-president, and
hopes for having a woman president started to grow.
At some stage, the relationship between Joyce Banda and the president
became sour. The relationship had become increasingly tense as the
President’s desire to position his younger brother, Peter Mutharika, as the next
president became obvious. Joyce Banda ceased to be useful, and now had to
be cleared out of the way for Peter Mutharika. Peter Mutharika had previously
served as the Legal Advisor to the President and also served terms as Minister
of Education and Minister of Foreign Affairs, so he was eligible to assume
the position of presidential candidate for the DPP in 2014. The state media
(radio and television) were utilized as campaign tools for Peter Mutharika’s
election to the Presidency. The public TV programme, “The road to 2014”, for
example was dominated by the Peter Mutharika campaign. In this programme,
TV presenters went out asking DPP members and traditional chiefs whether
they supported Peter Mutharika as the next presidential candidate for the
2014 elections. Joyce Banda’s vocal resistance to the rise of Peter Mutharika,
together with Khumbo Kachali, the second vice president of the DPP, led to
her ousting from the position of Vice President of the ruling DPP party on
12th December 2010. Although she was ousted from the party, she continued
to serve as the vice president of the Republic of Malawi, in accordance with
the Constitution of Malawi. However, with the deteriorating relationship and
increased tension, the conditions were unfavorable for the vice president to
perform her duties and her full potential.
According to media reports, there were attempts to silence Joyce Banda

and eventually drive her into resigning from the office of vice-president.
One of the strategies included a plot to arrest her on trumped up treason
charges. This, however, did not happen. Another alleged plan was to enact
legislation that would empower the president to fire his/her vice-president.
The Constitution does not give the president the power to fire his/her vice
president. The constitution stipulates that the vice president shall hold office
from the date of the administration of the oath until the end of end of the
president’s term of office.
What was clear is that Banda’s security detail was reduced and some
official cars were withdrawn from her use. Further, as Tenthani (2012) notes,
she was “subjected to daily doses of derision at public rallies and on Malawi’s
state airwaves”. A senior politician categorically declared that Malawi “was not
ready for a female president” (Tenthani, 2012). The then First Lady, Callista
Mutharika, joined the verbal attacks, referring to Banda as wophika mandasi
(one who bakes fritters), in derisive reference to Joyce Banda’s involvement
in women in small businesses. The First Lady is quoted as saying: “She will
never be president, how can a mandasi [fritter] seller be president?” To this,
Joyce Banda responded: “Yes, she’s right, I’m indeed a mandasi seller and I’m
proud of it because the majority of women in Malawi are like us, mandasi
sellers” (Tenthani, 2012).
The African Renaissance seeks new ways of thinking and feeling about
African men and women, their histories, economic, social and political
statuses. In other words, the African Renaissance should be a process towards
the decolonization of the gender-biased mind, and the resolve to redress
ideologies of differential power relations between men and women and the
gendered socialization that continue to marginalize, oppress and discriminate
against women. Women in Africa must be treated as full-fledged citizens and
be given every opportunity to use their potential fully including in political
power.
Ironically, at the occasion marking Malawi’s 50 years of independence
on 6 July 2014, President Peter Mutharika (and younger brother of the late
President Bingu wa Mutharika) praised his late brother for choosing Joyce
Banda as presidential running mate, saying that the appointment was a
step in line with the empowerment of women. He further said: “I take it as
no mean achievement that in the first fifty (50) years of our independence,
Standpoint | 81
Malawians have had a female president, Dr Joyce Banda” (Dumbula, 2014). It

is clear that the chose of Joyce Banda for presidential running mate in 2009
was a well-calculated political maneuver that was aimed at assisting Bingu wa
Mutharika to win the votes, in the context of a global discourse favoring the
empowerment of women in leadership. Once in power, Bingu wa Mutharika
unceremonious shift towards Joyce Banda underscored the way political
systems treat and instrumentalise women.
References
African Union. 2009. Gender policy. Addis Ababa: African Union.
Akihire, J. 2004. Towards women’s effective participation in electoral processes: A
review of the Ugandan experience. Feminist Africa. Issue number 3.
Dumbula, J. 2014. APM hails late Bingu for choosing JB as running-mate in
2009. http://malawi24.com/amp-hails-late-bingu-for-choosing-jb-as-=running-
mate2009/[retrieved 14 July 2014]
Haralambos, M & M. Holborn. 2008. Sociology: Themes and perspectives. London:
Harper Collins Publishers.
Ibrahim, J. 2004. The first lady syndrome and the marginalisation of women from
power: Opportunities or compromises for gender equality? Feminist Africa. Issue
3.
Kamlongera, P. 2008. Malawi women’s participation in state politics: What are the
constraints? Gender and Development. 16 (3): 471-480.
Kaspin, D. 1995. The politics of ethnicity in Malawi democratic transition. Journal of
Modern African Studies. 33(4): 595-620.
Malawi Government. 2008. Revised Gender Policy. Lilongwe: Ministry of Women and
Child Development.
Mama, A. 1995. Feminism or femocracy? State feminism and democratisation in
Nigeria. Africa Development. 20 (1): 37-58.
Msimang, S. 2000. African Renaissance: Where are the women? Agenda. 44: 67-83.
Nelson, C. 1974. Public and private politics: Women in the middle eastern world.
University of Chicago Press.
Okeke, E. P. & O. Godwin 2006. Women, NEPAD and nation building: Revisiting a
dying debate. African Sociological Review. 10 (2): 72-93.
Posner, D. N. 1995. Malawi’s new dawn. Journal of Democracy. 6 (1): 131-145.
Southern Africa Development Community. 2008 Protocol on gender and development.
Gaborone: Southern Africa Development Community
Tamale, S. 2000. ‘Point of order, Mr Speaker’: African women claiming their space in
parliament. Gender and Development. 8 (3): 8-15.
Tenthani, R. 2012. Joyce Banda: Malawi’s first female president. www.bbc.com/news/

world-africa-17662916 [retrieved 14 July 2014]
Tripp, A. M. 2003. Women in movement: Transformations in political landscapes.
International Feminist Journal of Politics. 5 (2): 233-255.
United Nations Development Programme 2005. Increase women’s representation
in political bodies. Taking action: Achieving gender equality and empowering
women. London: United Nations Development Programme.
Malawian newspapers
Malawi News
The Nation
Daily Times
Nyasa Times
Malawian radios
Malawi Broadcasting Corporation (MBC)
Radio 2 FM
Zodiak Radio
In Conversation | 83
In Conversation: Weaving Pan Africanism at the Scene of

Gathering, The Weaving Kenya Women’s Collective
Ta Imaaaagini!
Ta imagini that
you and I
and all the women
of this world
stood hand in hand
marched side by side
crossing
dividing borders
constructing
connecting bridges
shattering
binding chains
creating
delinkable links
across the nations
across the continents!
– Micere Githae Mugo
What is important to us matters. We matter. How we feel and think and

desire matters.
– Pumla Dineo Gqola
To whom do theorists speak?

– Carole Boyce Davies
Sound into Space

* Your email has been sent *
The year is 2014. President Barack Obama of the United States is “the most
powerful man in the world.” The African Union, formerly the Organisation of
African Unity, is celebrating its 50th year. Lupita Nyong’o has been installed as
the most beautiful woman in the world by global acclamation.
The year is 2014. In the United States, black men continue to die the deaths
of the disposable. In Africa, the African Union licenses African presidents to
commit war crimes with impunity. Egypt convicts Al-Jazeera journalists for
doing their job and sentences them to long prison terms. “Corrective rape”
in South Africa leaves women’s corpses in the streets. Boko Haram kidnaps
hundreds of schoolgirls. An Ebola panic thrusts already precarious lives into
greater vulnerability as the need for medical services rises sharply away from
its availability. In Kenya, an ethnic-cleansing exercise disguised as a security
operation incarcerates thousands of ethnic Somalis in the Kasarani Sports
Stadium, deports some to refugee camps, repatriates others to Somalia, and
alienates many of them into exile.
[A]t the centre of Kenyan social and political culture stands the phallus,
as a literal and symbolic signifier of power.
– Grace Musila
What might it mean to chart imagined communities that sutured, rather than
excluded, acknowledged the critical linkages between and contributions of
women rather than re-inscribing the phallocentric erasure of women? What
alternatives futures become possible by taking seriously the world-building
but quietly routine mycelium of women’s networks and relationships, instead
of remaining incarcerated in the fractured dystopias of the AU’s cabals?
I have wondered why very little of what we write has to do with our
ordinary lived realities.
– Oyeronkwe Oyewumi
If you ululate, they will come.

Akitelek Mboya: I’m here!
Aleya Kassam: Thanks!
Dayo Forster: iPads and my chubby fingers don’t mix well.
Garnette Oluoch-Olunya: I am here!
Kerubo Abuya: Nipo pia!
Marziya Mohammedali: Here!

Mshaï Mwangola: ‘Mshaï!’
Ngwatilo Mawiyoo: It’s 3 a.m.
Wambui Mwangi: Aha!
Wangui wa Goro: Unleash, unleash!
Wanjiru Kamau-Rutenberg: I’m here, too!
The whole factual world of human affairs depends for its reality and its
continued existence, first, upon the presence of others who have seen
and heard and will remember, and, second, on the transformation of the
intangible into the tangibility of things.
...
The political realm arises directly out of acting together, the “sharing
of words and deeds.” Thus action not only has the most intimate
relationships to the part of the world common to us all, but also is the
one activity which constitutes it.
– Hannah Arendt
Where is “here”?
“Here” is everywhere the ululation finds a resonance and creates a
“sharing of words and deeds.” Thus, “here” is a space of transformative
collective possibility, where it is possible to “act together” in articulating
our world. “Here” is wherever you are standing when you turn toward
the ululation, and in turning, arrive at the part of the world “common
to us all.”
Weaving Kenya is a feminist collective formed in 2012 as a staging ground for
women’s collaborative and cooperative creativity. In a cyber-space anchored
in Nairobi, a group of Weaving women convene a virtual round-table on ‘Pan
Africanism, Diaspora and Gender’ to revisit ideas of belonging and identity,
and to see what happens if we take our own lives, our own experiences, and
our own memories seriously as a mode of being-in-the world.
Wangui: For a person without food and shelter, or for a person with more than
enough food and shelter, these may not be immediately pressing questions. But
for those whose task it is as thinkers or creative people, whose life-work is to find
explanations, solutions, or answers for the more intractable problems of our time,
these issues remain of interest to us in their philosophical and material forms.
The future of our world may depend upon the ability of all women to
identify and develop new definitions of power and new ways of relating
across differences. The old definitions have not served us, nor the earth
that supports us. The old patterns, no matter how cleverly arranged to
imitate progress, still condemn us to cosmetically altered repetitions
of the same old exchanges, the same old guilt, hatred, recrimination,
lamentation and suspicion.
– Audre Lorde
Mshaï: The story-teller endeavours to make something new—to create or
fashion anew—out of that which already exists. The intention is always to
shed new meaning, to arrive at new knowledge or insight, to make those who
engage the story, or who are part of the story-ing process, perceive something
new, to become conscious of something even in that which is most familiar.
The language of “weaving” is a foundational claim to our cultural traditions
and legacies of women working and speaking together, of collaboration and
co-operation. We claim not any one method or fabric, but the practice of
weaving our labor and weaving the imagination of women together, so as to
make something new.
Space into Ground

Kenya’s official languages: English, Kiswahili and Silence.
But there was also memory
– Yvonne Adhiambo Owuor
Ngwatilo: Whatever is African about me has to be able to have and articulate

its identity. It has to come with its own narrative and aesthetic, one that
can stand revision, and it has to come with its own “mental space,” with
grounding.
This grounding is the call. The call is that to which one turns, and in
turning, finds oneself standing on the ground of the call. Here, then, we treat
the propensity of women to show up for a work of community labour as the
work of a spatial extension of community itself. The spatial reach of the sound
is the radius of the community. The ululation does not merely travel across
its own diameter: it gathers the trajectory to itself and transforms it into a
mode of its extension.
We follow Audre Lorde in transforming silence into language and

action—articulating, validating, affirming, performing, and supporting
diversity, even as we celebrate communality.
–Mshaï
A ululation, properly understood, then, creates a central point for a sonic
navigation of a community of those within hearing, or those who present
themselves in the present. This is the first act of the political: the action of
gathering toward each other, in a gestural demarcation of a “here” able to
generate its own temporality by shaping a workable past and a livable future
from the resonance of its present articulation.
There’s a conjuring going on.
– Nalo Hopkins.
For Weaving Kenya, ululation is an epistemological stance as well as an ethical
one because it is a breaking of silence, a resistance to enforced norms of
decorum, an often joyful noise, an always powerful intervention, a way of
calling out and answering yes to each other, and, sometimes, a way of grieving.
Even when a ululation is one of lament, however, to be heard lamenting is to
create a community from an audience bound by a shared signal. Those who
hear themselves addressed show up. Sometimes, they show up in the address.
We ululate in order to animate our “we” with attention and participation,
to claim and to call up the generative dissent, creative refusals, and critical
discourse that we claim as a collective legacy of feminism. If ululation makes
a space in-between those who know themselves addressed by the sound, it
simultaneously creates the grounds for the addressees to call to their other
communities of belonging, in their turn. These relationships are part of the
ongoing work of building a sharable world. These are the architextures of our
world(s).
“She” wraps herself around tar and brick, around wooden scaffolding.
– Heba Amin and Akitelek Mboya
Architexture
Mshaï: In this space, I want to share how sister-souls come beside us to lighten
the load we are carrying and walk alongside us on the difficult patches of our
journey – their presence is the grace that helps us get through those rough patches.
I had been in Melbourne for my Masters, and in January 2008, I left for
Ghana to participate in a fellowship divided equally between the University
of Ghana and Northwestern University. Since I had to get my US visa from

my home country, I stopped over in Kenya. I was excited to see my family,
as I had not seen them for two years. I did not know it was a grace-trip to
farewell Dad. Dad was in hospital at the time. In the way families shield those
living in diaspora from these things, I had not really been fully apprised of his
condition, and it was a shock to see the “Daddy” I had left behind – the man
who was strong enough to take on the whole world – so frail.
My friend Charity invited me to spend a night at her place. When I got
there, she offered me the gift of either talking about what was happening
around me, and to do whatever I wanted, laugh, cry, reminiscence, rage. Or,
I could shut out the realities outside the house for that one blessed evening.
I chose the latter. I can’t remember what we cooked, only that it was made
delicious by her quiet caring. Then we sat up and watched a video. It was that
silliest of comedies, Father of the Bride. I laughed and cried and it was not
about the movie at all but about something I could not express. Then we sat
up for most of the night and talked. I can’t tell you about what. The next day
I left with the gift of that precious, life-shaping interlude.
Dad died about a month later, when I was in Ghana. My family did not
want to send the news directly to me, so they e-mailed Prof. Kofi Anyidoho.
Prof. and Prof. Sandra Richards from NU, the two preceptors of our institute,
who broke the news to me. Sandra Richards, my first African American big
sister, held me in that first instance of telling. I must have cried. I must
have said something. All I remember is that she put her arms around me
and provided comfort. That day, the other fellows on the programme taught
me a new dimension to pan-Africanism: beyond our different passports and
histories, it was a relationship of care. They held in that first mad wave of
grief.
To this day the only way I can describe it is that it felt like I was a room
full of furniture and someone suddenly pulled the carpet on which it all stood
from under the legs of it all and everything went crashing over, scattering
contents of drawers and tops all over the room. It would be months before
I gathered it all again together, before I began to put together the room
without the comfortable cushioning that the carpet had provided, before I got
used to the bareness of the exposed floor and realised I could—and would—
live without it, and survive, even thrive. But those first moments, that group
of fellows closed ranks around me and held me together.
The sister to my heart—Jean—was in France. That December—this was in

February—Jean forwent her regular trip home to Kenya to come instead to
Australia where I had returned, knowing how difficult that first Christmas
would be. 25th December is Dad’s birthday. At the most difficult times, when
I just could not find it in me to be nice or happy, Jean took the brunt of it.
She loved me through it in a way I had no idea I even needed. She made it
possible for me to get through that first Christmas of the rest of my life.
Years later, I happened to be in Kenya over summer, and ran into her
family, who told me her father was in hospital. I went to visit, and just before
I left, he asked me to pray, “because it will be like having Jean here.” I got
a call the next day—he’d gone, before Jean was able to arrive from France.
cracks gently ease together
I temper our scars with gold
You whisper our story, trace
a path to a yearning truth
we breathe. Our fractured souls
glimmer in the moonlight.
– Marziya Mohammedali
Gr(ou)nding to a Halt: A Method of Interruptions

Make it find to out what your own hands are good for.
– Shailja Patel
What difference does gender make?

We need to think of feminist transnational practices as a way of
re(encountering) what is already encountered, in the very crossing of
national and regional borders.
– Sara Ahmed
We start to work, but we are interrupted. We stop. We start again. We re-start,
stop, start, stop. Delays, emergencies, exhaustion, children, hospital visits,
equipment breakdowns, competing deadlines, travel and family schedules.
En considérant le travail non rémunéré des femmes comme un ‘travail
familial’ dans le cultures de rente effectuées par les homes, dans les
‘activités de subsistance’ (de la culture à la transformation des cultures
vivrières à l’approvisionnement en eau et en combustibles) et dans les
tâches domestiques (entretien des enfants, cuisine et ménage), les études
féminines et la recherche féministe ont aidé à faire prendre conscience du

fait que le travail salarié et la production de marchandises ne constituent
pas les seules formes de travail qui existent ou qui contribuent à donner
de la valeur.
– Ayesha Imam
Garnette: August is the school holidays. The children are at home all day.
Wanjiru: [Distant sounds of frenetic schedule]
Eleven Weavers answered the ululation but only nine arrived. Two were
arrested along the way by the exigencies of life: interruptions that subvert
work and good intentions, obligations that stretch capacities to breaking
point, and attachments that distribute the self between duty and desire.
We draw attention to these absences not only to mark our loss of a
certain intellectual energy, but also to suggest them as paradigmatic of the
quotidian forces that separate women from the world of appearances. This
dis-appearance has significant historical effects:
Is it not possible that there were more key women figures in this pan-
African history, or simply that many have gone unrecognised? . . . [S]
cholars have not sufficiently turned their attention to the lives and
contributions of women.
– Hakim Adi & Marika Sherwood
Kerubo: There was a power cut from Friday to Monday.
Wambui: There was a power cut as I was writing about power cuts that
interrupt writing.
Those who arrived at the digital convention were reminded again that
contemporary social formations are cyborg and multi-element assemblages
containing and depending upon many inanimate and inorganic elements. The
relatively small group of women in Africa with access both to electricity
and the internet are often reminded of the precarity of our privilege by the
frequency and caprice of its withdrawal.
There is another power cut. We finally get it: There will be interruptions.
Marziya: KPLC means Kenyan People’s Lamps and Candles
Our woven worlding is a mark of social specificity at a time when
most women in Africa are still awaiting the opportunity to complain about
interruptions in electrical supply.
Interruption becomes important: a rhythm. Sometimes we are the
interruption. Sometimes we are interrupted. Some of these interruptions
are planned. Some of these plans are interrupted. We learn to work in and
through interruptions. We watch the work of the interruption. We weave
interruptions into the work. We work interruptions in, to do work, to perform
a labour.
making a poem
we hadn’t a shape for
layering improvised harmonies
onto an unscored page
– Shailja Patel
The interruptions prevented us from having a system, as they disorganised its
patterns and linear formations and placed us instead in an unpredictable field
of conversation.
These in turn produce what can be identified as a “new space, an area
of transformation and change where we can no longer accept a factual
or natural account of history and culture, nor simply seek to retrieve a
hidden authentic identity.”
Interruptions create hitches, glitches, pauses, enigmatic aporias, uneven
patterns, momentary disturbances, a small turbulence. Voices overlap, weave
in and out, over and under, confirming, questioning, calling: creating
space, making small spaces into which might slide an elsewhere, an Other, a
“something-else.”
We summon women who speak of un-homing, dis-placements, border
crossings, bodies out of place. We call them to interrupt us, to intervene,
to erupt amongst and between us. Summoning them disrupts the bounded
configurations of our conversation, crossing, and re-crossing the boundaries
between our many “heres” and “theres,” and dissolving and recombining our
sense of “them” and “us.”
The words name, stand alone, relate, reduce themselves and build as they
speak critically, signify, oppose dominance.
These women interrupt our preoccupations by intervening with sometimes
dissenting constructions of “Africa,” of “woman” of “Blackness,” of “Pan
Africanism,” and of “Africa.” Together, we trouble citational conventions,
the structures of bibliographies, the fraudulent smoothness of textual and
rhetorical linearity, the space of the page, our own voices.
This includes not only the diversity embodied in and articulated by

African/black women but also in other feminist intellectuals whose
commitments are similar to our own—Trinh Minh-ha, Chandra Mohanty,
Gloria Anzaldúa, Purinma Mankekar, and so many others.
– Mshaï Mwangola
We learn to see the interruptions as openings and leakages, leading in new
directions, or as remnants and revenants, returns of the unreconciled. There
are many forms of interruptions, at one extreme of which are the forces
structuring social precarity, displacements, and un-homing.
Routes into Memory

—How do we experience these locations as both situations and
interpolations? How do they impress upon our lives as embodied
persons?
What is it to inhabit a world?
– Veena Das
Discourses of sisterhood and “Africa” imbricate us, interpolate us, interpellate

us, call us home to injury. We probe the soft spaces of vulnerability and
grief, the still-aching losses, separations, dispossessions, dislocations and
disorientation.
To bear witness
– Mshaï Mwangola
To bear witness
– Meida McNeal
To bear witness
– Renée Alexander Craft
To bear witness
To call up memory, consciously respecting its
power to heal as well as to hurt
– Meccasia E. Zabrinskie
Five Stories
I. Wangui: I have had chemo three times in my life, and each time I lose my
hair, all of it. It feels like a loss of a tooth that will never return. The baldness
of chemo is unlike any other. The follicles fall from the root, so that rough
undergrowth is missing. You long for the tug of the comb, and the crunch,
crunch that you hear as you comb it.
Your head is so smooth, no scarf will sit on it, and those turbans, am I
going to wear one? They are worse and will draw attention. Then you will
have to talk about it. Console people. Do I go bald and shock and annoy?
You hear strident voices speaking about hair and you keep quiet, swallow,
when they say you should not straighten your hair, or perm it or wear a wig.
The righteousness gets my goat. I was like that once.
I think of hair differently now.
Now, I don’t know what lies beneath people’s clothes or heads. Maybe
they are carrying bigger burdens than Afro-centrism. They are fighting for
their lives and the little dignity a wig can afford them. They should be allowed
them.
I take a photo of me before the follicles fall off. They want to match the
length.
The textures here don’t reflect me. Maybe they think only white women
get cancer. I will go to the Afro-shops, and buy myself a wig, nay, wigs, lots
of them. I am feeling sexy, outrageous. Lets go red! It will be a couple of
weeks before I wear it, and it too slips off so you have to wear netting that
holds it into place.
All those Afrocentrics will go ballistic: Wangui wa Goro is brainwashed!
Wigs have become a healing part of me now. I look at women’s heads and
wonder. The more daring the wig, the more I feel I understand.
Black women survive these climes in weaves or wigs or perms, trying to
blend in.
The absence of any standard languages of pain is perhaps symptomatic
of the fact that I cannot separate my pain from my expression of it—
another way of saying this is that my expression of pain compels you in
unique ways—you are not free to believe or disbelieve me—our future is
at stake.
– Veena Das

Let’s face it: we’re undone by each other. And if we’re not, we’re missing
something.
–Judith Butler

II. Marziya: A typical Saturday morning in the city of Perth, only interrupted
by a man who walks up behind you, and unexpectedly shouts, “Terrorist!”
Your first reaction is to jump away from where you are standing.
Somewhere in your mind, you know you should be taking note of what he’s
saying, should be walking away. You’re not quite sure how to react.
Without really thinking about it, you turn on your heel and look at him,
exclaiming, “What? Where?”
You feel half-dried, worn-out, alone, trying to understand the labels that
have been slapped on you: Muslim. Woman. Kenyan. Pakistani. Student.
Hijabi. Oppressed.
Headstrong. Struggling.
Lost.
[T]urning back evokes not so much the idea of a return, as a turning
back to inhabit the same space now marked as a space of destruction, in
which you must live again. Hence, the sense of the everyday as the sense
of something recovered.
– Veena Das

when trees die
all small hearts break
...
all life becomes danger
how to find
another place
where all is not
yet barren.
– bell hooks
III. Kerubo: I awoke to information that the beautiful palm tree  at the front
of my parents’ home had been cut down. Yes, I am mourning a tree. She was
beautiful, elegant, and just so visually enchanting.
I loved her. I thought about her all morning/afternoon. I cried in the
shower. Yes, I did.

I was informed that four trees that had been clipped would also be cut
down soon. I vehemently protested.
Something silently reminded me that I am an unmarried Omogusii woman
who lives in her parents’ home. In coded silence, I remembered that I am
not supposed to complain. After all, the men of the home had endorsed the
cutting of the palm tree. She belonged to them. This is their home. Not mine.
I have no claim to the palm tree. I really don’t belong here.
IV. Saidiya Hartman: A pattern of collegial joking and teasing had developed
over the course of our first weeks together. Ninety percent of the remarks
began “You South Africans,” “You Nigerians,” “You Ghanaians.” But whenever
I entered the circle I was greeted by an awkward silence, either because my
colleagues didn’t know what to say or because they feared I would be insulted
if they called attention to my difference, which was charged for all of us,
especially in the context of our collective investigation of slavery. My presence
tainted the glory of pre-colonial Africa. I was the disposable offspring of
the “African family,” the flesh-and-blood reminder of its shame and tragic
mistakes. When behind my back my colleagues grumbled “those Americans,”
I didn’t discern any tenderness or affection, only ridicule and envy.
[N]one of my colleagues . . . gave much thought to the way their history
was enmeshed with mine, nor did they entertain the idea that the Africa
in my hyphenated African-American identity had anything to do with their
Africa. They made it clear: Africa ended at the borders of the continent.
V. Akitelek: My family, numbering in the mid hundreds, was displaced from

their land in Saboti, Trans Nzoia, in the 1992 post election violence. During
the clashes my grandparents’ house was burnt to a crisp. I would have been
just a few years old then but the events of this time are some of my earliest
memories. This is the point at which my life began.
The only thing they salvaged from this particular attack was a shiny red
chair from my grandmother’s house. Fake leather, ruby red. My grandmother
died a few months later. My mother says she died of distress over the lives
she had lost through the destruction of her objects. This shiny red chair
represents the testimony of my grandmother’s life, and the symbolic lives of
all my family.
The pivotal experience of my life was one in which objects were lost. I
don’t keep things. I have no fabric, no trinkets, no jewellery handed down, no
books. I have never kept anything that could be physically taken from me. The
things I do have I dispose of as soon as I start to attach to them.
Our first pass at a transnational sensibility tended to produce ambivalence
at best and hostility at worst as if we, too, did not know what happened at
the end. However, when we arrived at the end of our conversations we found
new layers of resonance waiting there for us. In revealing our scar tissues
from the injuries of un-homing suffered even by those who are “at home,”
we re-collected networks, reprised friendships, and remembered acts of grace
described in such detail that they gathered us in to the re-collecting grief and
into a memorialised gratitude.
The Complex Order of Community

When we entered this conversation, Akitelek Mboya was journeying West
across the Sahel; when we reached its official end she was crossing from
North Africa to Europe. Until we started on this conversation, she had not read
Carole Boyce Davies’ work on the transgressive writing of border crossings
women. Akitelek read it for the first time as she was crossing borders herself,
and navigating the abyss between abstract Pan Africanisms and the fleshy
menace of African customs officials. Afterwards, she said,
Akitelek: You were right. [Carole Boyce Davies] is changing my life at every
turn.
The “carrying of ideologies” is the final iteration of “ordinary” Pan
Africanism. Ideologies are carried by and through persons embedded in
overlapping networks of belonging. By ‘ideology’ here we mark not a political
platform but a way of relating of being
In-relation with.
In this room, for one hour
Let’s be easy in our skins
Observe ourselves
With gentle curiosity
Proffer and accept
Selected morsels of our lives.
– Shailja Patel
Dayo: My current emotional journey has as much of a bearing on the things

I will say and how I will say them. As my mother pointed out to me yesterday,
I left her 30 years ago, when I was eighteen. Just that statement makes me
want to cry. She’s giving me advice about how to let go of my son, who is
now nineteen, and about to go to university. He’s been on a gap year and
we’ve spent a lot of time together in the past year bonding. I am about to
let my son—remember when he fell out of the high wardrobe cupboard at 3,
when he got concussed from rugby, how his terror of mannequins developed
from the enthusiastic clown that chased him in Abidjan, how he used to dance
with forefingers pointing outwards to keep the beat until we laughed it out
of him—go.
The story began long ago . . . For years we have been passing it on, so
that our daughters and grand daughters may continue to pass it on. So
it may become larger than its own proper measure, larger than its own
in-significance. The story never really begins nor ends, even though there
is a beginning and an end to every story, just as there is a beginning and
an end to every teller.
– Trinh T. Minh-ha
We introduced this woven engagement with the question of Pan Africanism by
presenting and attending to four intertwined ideas of “being here” or being
“present”: locale, location, located-ness, and localisation. We foreground the
individual and specific geographical locations from which we think and write
because the sights and sounds and smells and sensibilities of being in place
also structure what we think of as ‘our’ place. We mark that that our collective
re-articulation and representation of these diverse spaces, places, and
situations is a practice of ‘worlding’ and by implication, also one of mapping
our imbrication in the diverse situational and generational interpretations of
an imagined continental or global community.
Genealogies that not only specify and illuminate historical and cultural
difference but also envision and enact common political and intellectual
projects across these differences constitute a crucial element of the work
of building critical multicultural feminism.
– Chandra Talpade Mohanty
We underscore the attachments, affiliations and sutures of belonging, often
forged in the direst moments of our migrations and re-crossings, as the
anchors of one ephemeral mapping of the world. Similar mapping-networks
are iterated multiple times in the relationships through which women build
and memorialise a world, patterning and archiving it in a repository of
material artifacts and remembrance.
All that you touch,
You Change.
All that you Change,
Changes you.
– Octavia Butler
Mshaï S. Mwangola is a member of Weaving Kenya and of The Quilt. Wangui
wa Goro and Carole Boyce Davies have been friends for years. Carole Boyce
Davies taught Mshaï Mwangola in graduate school. Shailja Patel is a member
of Weavers. Shailja Patel and Amina Mama are friends. Amina Mama came
to Nairobi and caused this Weaving to appear. Akitelek, during her travels
with Invisible Borders, travelled from North Africa to Europe and met Jean
Thevenet, who is “Mshaï’s Jean,” in France. Dayo and Wangui met in England
for the first time during this conversation.
I have been unprotected. I have been naked and exposed. I have been
clothed and armoured. I know what I carry in my suitcase. I carry my
history. I carry my family. Over my saris, I wear my sisters.
– Shailja Patel
Evocations: Calling Criss-Crossing Community

We began with a ululation. We end with an evocation. We call up the women
who have sustained us, inspired us, accompanied us, comforted us, befriended
us. Those who embrace and hold us, those whose writing enlightens us and
whose music moves our bodies in synchrony and syncopation, those who
feed, and hold and nurture us, those whose thoughts we invite to mingle
with ours, women we love and learn from. If the ululation is a space-making
gesture, the evocation sutures us to lineage of feminism that extends across
the world and across time. If the ululation creates and affirms our community,
our evocations memorialise and affirm the many worlds that we inherited and
the many worlds that we have made together with women around the world.
Abby Lincoln, Abena Busia, Abiola Ogunsola, Assia Djebar, Akua Gray,
Alice Walker, Ama Ata Aidoo, Amina Mama, Angela Davis, Angelique Kidjo,
Antoinette Handley, Anumbai Patel, Aretha Franklin, Asa, Aseneth Odaga, Asma
Mohamed, Abdel Halim, Atsango Chesoni, Ayesha Imam, Azadeh Moaveni,
bell hooks, Bessie Smith, Billie Holiday, Busi Mhlongo, Buchi Emecheta,
Carol Boyce Davies, Caroline Wanjiku Kihato, Cedella Marley, Chelagat
Mutai, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Doreen Baingana, Edwidge Danticat,
Efua Sutherland, Elizabeth Orchardson-Mazrui, Ellen Kuzwayo, Erykah Badu,
Fatoumata Diawara, Gcina Mhlope, Georgia Ann Muldrow, Gloria Naylor,
Grace Jones, Grace Ogot, Grace Onyango, ’Funmi Olonisakin, Hazel Carby,
Heba Amin, Hope Azeda, India Arie, Jamaica Kincaid, Jill Scott, Jita Allen,
Kara Keeling, Kelly Coate, Khadja Nin, Laura Mvula, Lauryn Hill, Maisha Auma
Eggers, Margaret Ogolla, Mariama Ba, Mary J Blige, Mary Muthoni Nyanjiru,
Marjorie Oludhe-Macgoye, Matlhogonolo Maboe, Maya Angelou, Mariama
Bâ, Mbilia Bel, Mekatilili wa Menza, Melissa Williams, Micere Mugo, Miriam
Chemmoss, Miriam Makeba, Miriam Were, Mkawasi Mcharo Hall, Molara
Ogundipe-Leslie, Monica Arach, Moraa wa Ngiti, Mumbi wa Maina, Mumbi
Kaigwa, Muthoni Garland, Muthoni Likimani, Muthoni Wanyeki, Mwana
Kupona, Nadine Gordimer, Nalo Hopkinson, Nahid Toubia, Natasha Jafri,
Nawal el Sadaawi, Ng’endo Mwangi, Nina Simone, Nkiru Nzegwu, Nourbese
Phillips, Obioma Nnaemeka, Nozipo Maraire, Oprah Winfrey, Oumou Sangare,
Penina Mlama, Patricia Collins, Patricia Williams, Phoebe Asiyo, Pumla Dineo
Gqola, Rasna Warah, Rebecca Njau, Rita Marley, Rokia Traoré, Sade Adu, Sade
Auma Adeyemo, Sandra Richards, Seble Dawit, Sharon Dean, Shailja Patel,
Sitawa Namwalie, Sonia Sanchez, Sweet Honey in the Rock, Suki Ali, Susan
Kiguli, Suzanna Owiyo, Sylvia Tamale, Thandiswa Mazwa, Titilayo C. Harrison,
Toni Morrison, Violet Birungi, Wambui Otieno, Wangari Maathai, Wanjiku
Kabira, Wanjiru Kihoro, Whitney Houston, Yvonne Adhiambo Owuor, Yvonne
Vera, Zahara Mkutane, Zora Neale Hurston.
If you evoke them, they will come.
Interlocutors
Audre Lorde. 2007. Sister Outsider. Freedom, CA. Crossing Press.
Ayesha M. Imam, Amina Mama & Aminata Sow 2004. ‘Introduction’ in Fatou Sow
(ed)., Anna Bathily and Maimouna Ka (transl]. Sexe Genre et Société: Engendrer les
Sciences Sociales Africaines. Dakar. Codesria.
bell hooks. 2012. Appalachian Elegy: Poetry and Place. Lexington. Kentucky University
Press.
Carole Boyce Davies. 1994. Black Women, Writing and Identity. New York. Routledge.
Chandra Talpade Mohanty. 2003. Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory,
Practicing Solidarity. Durham. Duke University Press.
Grace Musila.2009. ‘Phallocracies and Gynocratic Transgressions: Gender, State Power

and Kenyan Public Life. Africa Insight. vol 39 (1). June 2009.
Hannah Arendt. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago. Chicago UP.
Heba Amin and Akitelek Mboya. 2014. City Between Two Deserts. Amin & Mboya.
Judith Butler. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. New York.
Verso.
Judith Butler. 2010. Frames of War. London. Verso.
Marziya Mohammedali & Wambui Mwangi. 2013. ‘Kintsukuroi’ Koroga IV. http://
koroga.tumblr.com/post/56043962503/kintsukuroi
Micere Githae Mugo. 1994. My Mother’s Poem and Other Songs. Nairobi. East African
Educational Publishers.
Mshaï S. Mwangola. 2007. Performing Our Stories, Performing Ourselves: In Search of
Kenya’s Uhuru Generation. PhD Dissertation, Department of Performance Studies.
Northwestern University.
Nalo Hopkins (ed). 2003. Mojo Conjure Stories. New York. Aspect.
Octavia Butler. 1993. Parable of the Sower. New York. Aspect.
Oyeronkwe Oyewumi. 2011. Gender Epistemologies in Africa: Gendering Traditions,
Spaces, Social Institution and Identities. New York. Palgrave.
Pumla Dineo Gqola.2013. A Renegade Called Simphiwe. Johannesburg. MFBooks
Joburg.
Renee Alexander Craft, Meida McNeal, Mshaï S. Mwangola and Queen Meccasia
E. Zabriskie. 2007. The Quilt: Towards a Twenty-First Century Black Feminist
Ethnography. Performance Research. 12(3) 54-83.
Saidiya Hartman. Lose Your Mother: A Journey Along the Atlantic Slave Route. New
York. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Sara Ahmed. 2000. Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Postcoloniality. New York.
Routledge.
Shailja Patel. 2010. Migritude. New York. Kaya Press.
Trinh Minh-ha. 1989. Woman, Native, Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism.
Bloomington. Indiana UP.
Veena Das. 2006. Life and Words. Berkeley. California UP.
Yvonne Adhiambo Owuor. 2013. Dust. Nairobi. Kwani Trust.
Review | 101
Feminism, Empowerment and Development: Changing

Women’s Lives. Edited by Andrea Cornwall and Jenny
Edwards, 2012, Zed Books, London
Sehin Teferra
Feminisms, Empowerment and Development: Changing Women’s Lives

edited by Andrea Cornwall and Jenny Edwards (2014, Zed Books) provides a
thorough, and very necessary, examination of the empowerment model that
straddles feminism and development principles and rhetoric. An output of
the Pathways of Women’s Empowerment research programme, a five-year
project conducted by an international network of researchers, the impressive
collection of conceptual and empirical research investigates the meaning of
empowerment in women’s lives in diverse settings.
The introduction highlights, quite brilliantly, how the feminist principles
of empowerment that developed in the 1990s with a clear focus on women’s
consciousness has been watered down beyond recognition as a tool of the
aid industry. Echoing the feminist writer, Srilatha Batliwala (1994) who
has warned that empowerment is in danger of losing its transformative
edge, the chapter provides a specific example of the World Bank’s selective
interpretation of Naila Kabeer’s (1999) definition of empowerment reducing it
to a measurable outcome and as something one can do for others, stripping
the concept of its politics of consciousness and the emphasis on women’s
relationship with each other.
In many of the case studies, the programme examines the effects of
interventions executed by well-meaning development agencies, drawing a
distinction between policies, programmes and laws, thereby ‘complicating’
the narratives of empowerment. Subsequent chapters investigate other well-
traveled paths of empowerment such as legal reform in Egypt (the author
concludes that there is no direct path to empowerment and that processes
need to be participatory), and quotas as a tool of political empowerment
for women in Latin America which, while chronicling impressive, effective
feminist activism surmises that a successful outcome of more women in

political leadership does not necessarily lead to the empowerment of women
as a collective.
Two chapters study women’s organizations in Bangladesh, drawing a
picture of strategic engagement with political parties and the case of a
fundamentally feminist NGO that was once defunct and has since been
resuscitated, the notion of loyalty to an entity that, by most accounts
provided a real path to empowerment. The chapter on Palestinian women’s
resistance to occupation asserts boldly that empowerment is a new concept
imposed following the Oslo Agreements and pushed through “an aggressive
wave of funding of projects to women’s organizations”(p 200). Economic
independence from men guaranteed through work in a large factory, with
associated matrifocal residence and families being predominately organized
around a mother and her children was observed to contribute to women’s
empowerment and female solidarity in Bahia, Brazil.
These case studies demonstrate that unlike the simplistic by-the-numbers
approach espoused by the aid-development sector, which has largely failed to
empower women while even improving their lives, empowerment is a process
as opposed to a linear, measureable trajectory. Specifically, this book reminds
us that empowerment is relational in terms of time – disempowerment now
to an empowered future – and that it requires women’s collective action
as exemplified by the case studies on Brazilian domestic workers. We also
note that one woman’s empowerment may be another woman’s oppression
as discussed in the analysis of the Lady Health Workers’ project in Pakistan
which while largely lauded as a successful economic empowerment initiative
for participating women resulted in many of the daughters or sisters-in-law
of the health workers taking up more household chores to make up for the
absence of ‘Lady Health Workers’.
In addition, Feminisms, Empowerment and Development teaches us
to pay attention to context. As the research by Akosua Darkwah shows, for
older Ghanian women, education provided a pathway to empowerment,
while for younger women, the contemporary labour market has expanded
women’s means. Representation as a feminist issue was highlighted by the
dilemma faced by Bangladeshi activists in the characterization of acid-attack
survivors as non-victims. In terms of strategies, tactical accommodation and
compromise with the state-aid industry machinery by ‘feminist bureaucrats’
Review | 103
engaged in gender mainstreaming is analyzed in one of the case studies.

Furthermore, what the editors refer to as ‘hidden pathways [to
empowerment]’ were investigated by the Foucauldian analysis of religious
education classes studied by Neelam Hussain in Pakistan and by the qualitative
analysis into television watching as an unlikely avenue to empowerment
for poor women in Bangladesh in order to help the reader conceptualize
empowerment outside the development box.
There is contained within this book, a wealth of feminist critique of
‘empowerment lite’ (Cornwall, 1997) that greatly resonated with this reviewer
who, as a feminist, has observed the same gaps in her experience of ‘women’s
empowerment’ projects in the East African region. The book re-complicates
empowerment as a feminist tool, recalling its transformative edge beyond
the relatively simplistic ‘invest in girls and women’ model employed by the
development sector. Most significantly, the importance of shifting women’s
and men’s consciousness and the process of people developing the power
to act, which has largely fallen by the wayside of the rush to empower the
women of the developing world, is reclaimed by this important book.
However, the volume is not without its faults. It may be considered too
long, with too many case studies which because they all discuss important
topics, deserve more attention than may reasonably be given to a book of such
length, particularly when there is more than one case study from one country
as is the case for Brazil, Ghana, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Egypt. Perhaps two
volumes would have done better justice to the wealth of reflection produced
by this project. Although most of the authors indicate their participation in
the Pathways of Women’s Empowerment programme, it would have been
useful if beyond the information on contributors, the voices of the authors
and their personal reflections on the respective projects they are writing about
was reflected as it is in the ‘Subversively Accommodating’ article by Rosalind
Eyben. In addition, the volume could use more thorough editing: while it is
clearly written for the most part, there are more than a few typographic and
grammatical errors and some sentences in a few of the narratives are too long
with more than a few repetitions. In some instances, categorical statements
are made without proof or a source being cited.
Some of the arguments in a couple of case studies seem obvious,
particularly to a reader familiar with feminist and development discourses,
which would presumably consist of a majority of the intended audience of
the book while other narratives could use more details. Lastly, a few of the
case studies include non-English terms without their English equivalents, and
narratives are attributed to persons whose identity is not explained.
Despite these minor mishaps, Feminisms, Empowerment and Development
is a wonderful, and refreshing addition to the Development canon. Refreshingly
feminist, the volume takes development planners and practitioners to task in
getting women’s empowerment back on a feminist track.
Review | 105
Migrant Women of Johannesburg: Everyday life in an

In-Between City. By Caroline Wanjiku Kihato, 2013,
Wits University Press, Johannesburg
Kerubo Abuya
Set in Johannesburg’s inner city, central business district and adjacent

northeast residential suburbs of Berea, Hillbrow and Yeoville, Migrant
Women of Johannesburg: Everyday life in an In-Between City by Caroline
Wanjiku Kihato concerns the stories and experiences of 11 migrant women
from 10 African countries – from Nigeria to Tanzania – who crossed borders
over land, eventually gaining entry into South Africa through Mozambique
and Zimbabwe. Utilising the stories and self-supplied photographs of these
women’s lives in Johannesburg, Kihato reveals something of their daily reality
by exploring their living conditions, their ability and inability to meaningfully
participate in their host country, the spoken and unspoken codes for social
acceptability that they face, and the rejection and turmoil they often
experience. The women are of varying ages, educational and socio-economic
backgrounds, and their largely desperate and dangerous journeys to South
Africa were prompted by diverse circumstances, the common denominator
being a search for safety and upward economic and social mobility. The book
is a result of up to five years of Kihato’s personal interactions with several
of the women, in which she positions herself autobiographically as a “black,
African, middle class migrant woman” (2013: xiv).
Kihato’s account of the 11 cross-border migrant women paints a
picture of hope intertwined with despair, giving readers a window into the
complex lives that they and similarly positioned others lead, as well as the
dignity, resourcefulness, audacity and resilience that they demonstrate while
navigating the astringent spaces in which they unexpectedly find themselves
in Johannesburg. The book is organised into six main chapters. The first
chapter, entitled “Introduction: Welcome to Hillbrow, You Will Find Your
People Here,” rather harshly inaugurates the work with the words: “Get out!
GET OUT!” (2013: 1), echoing the kinds of reception and sentiment that some
cross-border migrant women encounter upon arrival in Johannesburg. Kihato
introduces Johannesburg as a “liminal city” with a rich yet deeply disturbing
history that continues to subjugate many of its residents, imperiously
reinforcing historical injustices, exclusions and persecutions.
The second chapter explores relations between the state’s legal instruments
and street dwellers, exposing the fluid nature of the boundaries between legal
and illegal practices in the city, and how “street laws” come to be constructed
and fortified. In the third chapter, Kihato considers how the migrant women
constantly negotiate the new social and cultural norms and expectations that
they find within their host city and migrant communities from their sending
countries that they meet in Johannesburg. The women’s pressure to portray
a well-to-do-lifestyle to people in their sending countries clashes with the
reality of the poverty that many of them are immersed in. Chapter four takes
us into the heart of the women’s private lives, concerning issues such as love,
beauty, family, domestic violence as well as the politics and complexity of
their local migrant communities. The following chapter gives an account of
the xenophobic violence that erupted in South Africa in May 2008, weaving
together the experiences of some migrants and state officials who were based
at the Cleveland police station and Glenanda camp for displaced refugees.
Here Kihato gives voice to the migrants’ grievances about the pain inflicted
by the overbearing arm of South African state power.
In the conclusion of the book, the author argues that understanding
urban processes in Johannesburg and elsewhere on the continent should
transcend the “simplistic dichotomies” that continue to dominate planning
and governing the African city. Her work demonstrates the blurred boundaries
between the divisions – “legal and illegal,” “official and unofficial,” “formal
and informal,” – which inform and shape the lives of migrant black African
women at the margins of the city. She questions the selective exercise of
power by state agents, pointing out systems of corruption and other injustices
that keep migrant women in a constant state of want and need. She also
provides insights on how the women devise strategies and tactics for survival,
which ultimately makes them significant agents in the matter of how and why
the ‘City of Gold’ is governed as it is. The author’s portrayal and analysis of her
subjects’ day-to-day living challenges epistemologies of the city “from above”
and makes a strong case for a balanced view that includes perspectives “from
Review | 107
below.” This is a bold move that calls on citizens, scholars, urban planners
and policy makers into closer proximity with the raw conditions that many
face in Johannesburg.
Kihato’s work can be situated within a broader literature on women’s
migration and urbanisation on the continent, including Women of Phokeng:
Consciousness, Life Strategy, and Migrancy in South Africa, 1900-1983 by
Belinda Bozzoli with Mmantho Nkotsoe (1998), and Teresa Barnes’ (1999) We
Women Worked So Hard: Gender, Urbanization, and Social Reproduction
in Colonial Harare, Zimbabwe, 1930-1956. All three works concern women
who seek better prospects in the city, and who emphasise the importance of
being “good” or morally upright there. The women in Bozzoli and Nkotsoe’s
work migrated from rural to urban South Africa and later returned home
to proud retirements, while the women in Barnes’ study followed a similar
trajectory in Zimbabwe, migrating into Harare and also eventually returning to
their rural origins with a sense of dignity and accomplishment. Indeed in both
cases some of the women even contributed to political freedom struggles.
By contrast, many of the cross-border migrant women in Kihato’s work
are immersed in the shame of their impoverished conditions in Johannesburg
and believe that they would face “social death” were they to return home.
This is not to suggest that the women are wholly subjugated, as they do
express their voices and agency in different ways. Kihato notes that the space
the women inhabit “can be empowering, providing a place of respite outside
of the state’s gaze. It is a space where agency and structure are in constant
interrelationship” (2014: 18).
One of the strengths of Kihato’s work is her deployment of a bold feminist
methodology that mixes ethnography, narrative inquiry and standpoint
theoretical underpinnings. She interviewed the women while interacting with
them in the spaces that they ordinarily inhabit and at bi-weekly workshops
over an extended period of time. Noting that “there were times when no
words in any spoken language could have articulated the women’s feelings,
memories, and ideas” (2013: 11), Kihato adds a visual component to her data
collection methods in which the women took and shared pictures of their
daily lives. While the women experienced this method as empowering, and
Kihato used pseudonyms to protect their identity, like her, I cannot help but
wonder whether the images could ‘incriminate’ any of the women in one way
or another if the state were to identify them.
It is a widespread critique that South Africa has one of the most progressive
constitutions in the world yet is also notorious for crime, inequality and
gender-based violence. Portraying the women in her research as neither
victims nor heroines, Kihato’s work is situated within the broader context of
systemic problems in South Africa that require urgent redress. Migrant Women
of Johannesburg is a timely, relevant and significant work that positions
marginalised migrant black African women as a group whose rights must not
be ignored in the spirit of upholding universal and indivisible human rights,
pan-Africanism and calls for a 21st century African Renaissance.
References
Barnes, T. 1999. We women worked so hard: Gender, urbanisation and social
reproduction in colonial Harare, Zimbabwe, 1930-1956. Portsmouth, NH
Belinda, B. 1998. Women of Phokeng: Consciousness, Life Strategy and Migrancy in
South Africa, 1900-83 (Social History of Africa). Martlesham , UK. James Currey
Kihato, W. C. 2013. Migrant Women of Johannesburg: Everyday life in an In-Between
City. Johannesburg: South Africa. Wits University Press. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN
978-1-86814-755-7 (print).
Review | 109
In Idi Amin’s Shadow: Women, Gender and Militarism

in Uganda. Alicia C Decker, 2014, Athen, Ohio, Ohio
University Press
Gabeba Baderoon
Like all good feminist works, In Idi Amin’s Shadow starts by refusing
conventional wisdom – which is that Idi Amin Dada was a singular and
sociopathic man, whose military rule in Uganda therefore is exceptional
and has no meaning outside of that country and that period. Instead, Alicia
Decker uses this part of Ugandan history to craft an insightful theory of
militarism and the gendered dynamics that drive it and are its legacy. Through
a painstaking and comprehensive case study of Uganda under the military rule
of Idi Amin from 1971 to 1979, she focuses on the way militarism constitutes
powerful norms of masculinity and femininity.
She also demonstrates that Amin’s militarism had a history, politics and
culture that preceded it and grew out of the British colonial occupation in
West Nile, and the use by Britain of its African colonial armies in brutal wars
in Egypt, Sudan, and Kenya. The formation of the state of Uganda from this
complex colonial history means that Amin’s capture of the country through
a military coup in 1971 and the progressive infiltration of militarism into
the whole of Ugandan society from 1971 to 1979, as well as its lingering
consequences, is made much more explicable. Indeed, we are left with the
urgent question of how this case study of militarism in Uganda in the 1970s
allows us to understand the transnational phenomenon of militarism today.
Into this history, a detailed and vividly rendered world is filled out and
given life by the experiences of women and others rendered invisible by
patriarchy and military violence. The intuition that marginalised people –
those whose position forces them into the shadows of dominant society
– generate knowledge that provides a fuller and more accurate picture of
history, and therefore of its lessons, is fully realised here, through interviews
with over 100 women and dozens of men who lived through the 8 years of
Amin’s rule. This is supplemented by detailed archival research, including into

commission reports that had been assumed lost from the historical record
and unique material generated through patient, generous and reciprocal
personal relationships that Decker developed with her Ugandan colleagues
and contacts. As a result, Decker’s book “ventures into the shadows” to talk
about a “harrowing time” and its legacy for contemporary Uganda and the
world. The metaphor of the shadows and its silences, dangers, ambiguities and
lingering effects are compelling and deserves even further explication.
In this study Decker brings together two orders of social experience, those
of ruler and ruled, men and women, but also elite and ordinary, official and
intimate, public and private – orders of experience and meaning that are
made visible and valued by feminist approaches. In fact, this book confirms
the importance of an ethical and intellectual imagination unconstrained by
convention for deepening our understanding of history, especially topics
suppressed by political oppression. Instead, Decker asks in her book: what
are women’s experiences of militarised societies and how can we gain access
to their voices? What is their role in the histories of political violence and
in envisioning a post-conflict national memory? How does militarism both
enable brutal violence with impunity, but also subject the men and women
inside military regimes to militarised violence themselves? By answering these
questions, In Idi Amin’s Shadow teaches us, to quote Decker, a powerful
insight into militarism and its “deeply gendered lessons”.
Accounts of public terror, used deliberately and strategically by Amin’s
regime, have produced an epistemological challenge in the sense that the
extent of such violence has been interpreted as a sign of insanity, barbarity
and singularity and has unfortunately fed into racist ideas about African
irrationality and savagery. This book instead addresses the rationality and logic
behind the scale of torture and the often-public performance of stark violence
used by Amin as a conscious political strategy. Harrowing as it is, the book
counters the haze of myth to tell a fuller history of Uganda’s history that also
holds insights for us in examining militarism elsewhere.
African Feminism
There are many reasons to celebrate this book. Perhaps most importantly,
Decker does justice to the place of gender, and of women, in history,
particularly those who were silenced by military violence. Moreover, she does
Review | 111
so by brilliantly employing central African feminist concepts in her book, and

placing them in relation to more widely cited and therefore paradoxically more
authoritative western scripts about feminism, overtly paradoxical in instances
where it is African feminists who have engaged most directly with African
contexts.
But in Decker’s approach we don’t only learn about African concepts but
about their complexity, for instance elucidating African concepts such as
the relation of sex and gender as a non-biological relationship. We also find
nuanced discussions of the work of pre-eminent African feminist scholars
Amina Mama on militarism, Patricia McFadden on postcolonial and post-
independence nationalisms, Jacklyn Cock on women’s roles in militarism
during apartheid and the anti-apartheid struggle, Nakanyike Musisi on gender
in post-independence Uganda, Yaliwe Clark’s research into post-conflict
masculinities, and Nina Mba’s comparative scholarship on military and
non-military political regimes in Nigeria – this is a truly wide-ranging and
erudite account of African feminist thought, as befits someone who holds a
Masters degree in Gender Studies from Makerere University. Examples of the
subtlety of Decker’s approach includes an exemplary engagement with earlier
scholarship, including the difference between warrior culture and militarised
culture and previous gendered readings, such as Ali Mazrui’s concept of
“political masculinity,” which have been both enabling and limiting.
However, the major African feminist contribution of this book is not only
to draw on its broad archive and to expose its readers a rich African conceptual
heritage but to elucidate a general theory of militarism and gender through a
case study of Uganda – In Idi Amin’s Shadow shows how militarism and state
violence can become entrenched into state practices and eventually organise
society around military violence as its core political principal. It traces how
the logic of military violence can come to permeate a society and become
ubiquitous, normalised and invisible, to the extent that people cannot imagine
living differently.
Citing the major feminist theorists Amina Mama and Margot Okazawa-Rey,
Decker observes that militarism is “an extreme variant of patriarchy” which
generates and consolidates particular forms of gender. Militarism – which
includes systemic violations of the bodies of citizens through the use of rape
and sexual violence as modes of terror and the production of masculinities
beholden to the military state – can nonetheless become a common and
almost “ordinary” political strategy because it is highly effective in enabling

violations of governance through corruption and appropriation of resources.
We also see that men who are drawn into militarised culture are nonetheless
also vulnerable to it, and are in constant danger of falling out of favour, or
being seen as feminine or weak. This requires ever more demonstrations of
hyper-masculinity and leads to escalating levels of violence. Indeed, in Amin’s
Uganda the idea of protection as a function of the state itself became despised
and feminised to the extent that the police were seen as “women” who did
not go to war, a contempt that “naturalised the violence and domination of
militarism,” as Decker points out.
A critical view of gender and militarism is therefore crucial, both because
militarism entrenches destructive forms of masculinity and femininity but also
because an instrumental emphasis on women’s roles during military rule helps
to obscure some of the violence of military logic by foregrounding limited
advances made by some women, and promoting an idea of the military as
protective, responsible and strong. Indeed, reading this, it is unsurprising to
note the prominent use of the image of the family to promote militarism –
Amin named himself Big Daddy, and promised that the military protects “the
home” and “the ones at home”.
How can women be nurturing and yet militarised? Amin crafted a
paradoxical image for promoting women’s visible participation in the state,
yet was responsible for unprecedented levels of brutality against both women
and men. As Decker notes, militarised masculinity demands “physical strength,
endurance, discipline and heterosexual competency”, and a militarised
femininity requires “nurturance, patience and support”. Because militarism
is an extreme form of patriarchal gender, combat is central to generating
militarised masculinity leading to heightened requirements for the exercise of
violence, so the exclusion of women from the zone of conflict is required for
women to support militarism “without threatening patriarchal social order”,
by being symbolically central but physically excluded.
Decker demonstrates to us the danger of overlooking both the spatial
and temporal dimensions of militarism – firstly, militarism has a history. Idi
Amin did not spring out of nowhere. He was literally the child of a history
of systemic violence perpetrated by the British during colonial rule. The
West Nile, the birthplace of Idi Amin, was an area subjected to pervasive
impoverishment and marginalisation under the British, leaving few options
Review | 113
but military service available to men. This was accompanied by the creation
of a mythology of “martial tribes” – so that deliberate impoverishment was
accompanied by a martial logic through the selective advancement of some
Africans during colonial rule if they were deemed to be “reliable”, aligned
to colonial ideology and racially advanced, and therefore given access to
education and opportunities in the colonial administration, and the exclusion
of others, who were described as racially inferior and relegated to poverty and
military service. This was the pre-history of Amin’s military rule and helps to
undercut ideas about the exceptionalism of Uganda.
Secondly, militarism seeks always to expand itself. Decker demonstrates
the extension of militarisation in social and civilian life in Uganda under
the rule of Milton Obote and then almost immediately under Idi Amin – for
instance, through the passing of laws that allowed military control over
the administration of justice such as powers of arrest and what constituted
evidence, the growth of paramilitary units, the establishment of military police,
the subjection of civilian officials to military discipline, and the proliferation
of powerful clandestine military intelligence units, who acted with increasing
violence and impunity. As importantly, the voracious reach of militarised social
structure is evident in the intrusion of militarism into the psyches and over
the bodies of citizens. Shortly after seizing power, Amin chose consciously
to focus on what women wore and banned miniskirts as a way to legitimate
and expand military power by a highly visible and popular strategy. Such
strategies of diversion and populism take over the space of public debate and
simultaneously enable theft by stealth through extreme levels of plunder and
political violence.
To counter such a strategy of expanding state violence requires an
ethical politics and courageous activism, as well as meticulous research and
the reclamation of histories. Women’s and men’s insistent voices, such as in
testimony before Uganda’s Commission of Inquiry into the Amin regime’s
increasing use of “disappearances” helped to demonstrate that terror was a
sustained and evolving state strategy under Idi Amin, and their testimony
countered “the deafening silence of disappearance, indelibly recording a
crime that was supposed to leave no trace.” In Decker’s interviews with them,
Ugandan women and men both inside and outside the regime testified to the
violence they suffered and that they witnessed, even when the effectiveness
of the forums for such testimony were undermined by the regime. In Decker’s
words, the women and men “refused to be silent, giving voice to a crime that
was supposed to leave no trace.” Such histories also reveal the ambiguities and
ambivalences of survival under a military regime, and show that some of the
strategies that women followed in a logic of political survival during military
rule included uneasy silence, complicity and unevenly benefitting from the
transient opportunities offered by the regime.
The proliferation of militarism is enabled by the myth of military utility
as a solution to complex problems such as crime or economic inequality. The
fantasy of efficient, targeted, effective military violence to address multifaceted
social phenomena in fact obscures the way militarised violence exacerbates
and perpetuates inequality, enables a vast scale of corruption, gendered and
ethnic violence, profound psychological suffering, ethnic division and a cycle
of political violence. Decker demonstrates that militarism proliferates and
insinuates itself into broader forms of governance, ideology, bodily and social
and intimate practices. This sense of state violence that intruded into private
and ritual spaces and carried out with impunity under new laws passed by the
military government has left effects far beyond 1979. Indeed, as Decker points
out, a “culture of violence…became Amin’s most enduring legacy.”
This is a work of history that deliberately seeks out voices that have been
left out of the formal record, contributing to the field of “history as meaning”
rather than solely “history as fact.” Such a history as meaning relies on
informal channels such as personal memory and Decker acknowledges that
such memory can suffer from elision, fracture and inaccuracy. She outlines the
meticulous research through which she established the validity of the insights
gleaned from her interviews, without ceding the central feminist method of
attending to the voices of those who have been excluded and silenced by the
powerful. Charges of inauthenticity, partiality and insignificance are often
used to obscure the violence of dominant classes, and this book counters
such claims by buttressing its use of women’s and marginalised men’s voices
through exhaustive archival and documentary evidence.
In describing the terrifying arbitrariness of opponents and ordinary citizens
who were kidnapped or subjected to unexplained arrests and detention after
which they were never seen again, Decker uses a noun as a verb – to be
“disappeared” – which has travelled across postcolonial contexts from Latin
America, and cites an unforgettable phrase from the Ugandan activist Thereza
Mulindwa, who asserted that the country’s women had become “widows
Review | 115
without graves.” These resonant terms suggest the need to create new
concepts to describe repeated acts of state violence which had no precedent
and crushed legal opposition. They also show the value of a comparative
approach, for instance, for understanding militarism in other postcolonial and
post-revolutionary states like Egypt and South Africa. Importantly, for scholars
based in the north, Decker’s study of the unexceptional case of Uganda can
allow us to understand better the “soft militarism” of non-military yet still
militarised states, like the US.
Conclusion:
Decker has produced a subtle, important, theoretically innovative and
elegantly written study that centralises feminist thinking and shows why it
matters. Phrases like “the utility of violence” and “the militarism-masculinity
nexus of Idi Amin’s Uganda” aptly articulate concepts that are a lasting
contribution to scholarship on gender and military rule. Significantly, the
book practices a generous model of scholarship evident in the several pages
of acknowledgements at the start of her book and pays tribute to the people
whose courage and memories constitute its central resource.
Concerning Violence: Nine Scenes from

the Anti-Imperialistic Self-Defense
Luam Kidane
From Göran Hugo Olsson, the Swedish documentary filmmaker behind The
Black Power Mixtape, comes Concerning Violence: Nine Scenes from the
Anti-Imperialistic Self-Defense, a documentary made up of archives from
various African decolonisation processes overlaid with excerpts from Frantz
Fanon’s final and seminal publication The Wretched of the Earth. The
conclusion of the film begins with artist Lauryn Hill, the narrator of the film,
reading from Fanon’s work “Come, comrades, the European game is finally
over, we must look for something else” begging the question; who is the
audience that these words are addressed to? Fanon is calling for Africans to
build models for liberation that reject European and colonial frameworks for
they are simply successions of negations of our humanity. When asked about
the audience of the film Olsson states “…[this] film [is] for my fellow west
Europeans, northern west Europeans, American[s]…It is not a film directed
at oppressed peoples it is directed to the westerns” (Timoner, 2014, minute
10:13). The archival footage is of Africans, of African liberation struggles,
of African celebrations and of mourning, and the text, The Wretched of
the Earth, is written by an African about African independence movements
yet the intended audience of the collage of African thought and expression
that is this film is not African. One can’t help but feel an eerie voyeurism
throughout the film not only knowing that we are not the intended audience,
but also knowing and feeling who is often behind the camera.
The footage that this film was made up of is held by the Swedish Television
Archives and as such Olsson has makes it clear that he feels an ownership
of the footage and even goes on to say that Fanon’s The Wretched of the
Earth “…is our [the western white audience’s] text. It is a common property”
(Timoner, 2014, minute 17:31). In colonial systems of domination our bodies,
Review | 117
our thoughts, and our knowledge production are not ours. As such, Olsson’s
statements do not depart from the colonial trajectories that Africans have been
resisting for centuries and that Fanon himself was calling us to reject. The only
difference here is that this film, from having Lauryn Hill act as narrator to the
contemporary aesthetic presentations of the footage, has managed to mask
the scent of colonialism and in doing so, advance the notion that cultural
production can be an apolitical site where the dynamics of white supremacy are
inoculated by the good white intentions of those behind the film.
The first scene of the film, preceded by a preface read by Indian feminist
Gayatri Spivak, Decolonisation: With the MPLA in Angola 1974 begins with
the voice of Gaetana Pagano, a reporter who was embedded with Movimento
Popular de Libertação de Angola (MPLA), as they entered Cabinda, a city in
the north of Angola. Pagano describes how the MPLA executed a successful
offensive on a Portuguese army base. Following footage of the offensive,
images of African caddies carrying the bags of white people playing golf
fill the screen. The point being made by juxtaposing footage of Africans
fighting for freedom with the humiliation of submission is to make vivid the
preposterousness of colonial living. It is at this point that Lauryn Hill reads
one of the most well known lines from The Wretched of the Earth “[t]he last
shall be first and the first last”.
These images transitions us into scene two, which is titled Indifference:
Interviews with Tonderai Makoni Ph.D, Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, Conducted in
Stockholm 1970. Here Tonderai Makoni recounts his experiences of being
jailed for five years and provides commentary that links the struggles of
African people from Zimbabwe to South Africa to Britain and the United
States of America. He asserts that in all of these places, though the particulars
of the subjugation may be different, the common thread that connects
the reasoning for why violence can be enacted on African peoples in each
circumstance is because we are always positioned as subhuman. This reasoning
then justifies Africans being treated as objects for domination.
As the Makoni interview fades “The U.D.I Song” by John Edmonds, a
track that celebrates the likes of Cecil Rhodes and others who were a part
of occupying Zimbabwe, introduces the third scene of the film, Rhodesia.
Following the white supremacist overtones of the Edmonds track, a white
colonialist male laments the increasing power that the African independence
movements are gathering. He had taken for granted that he would have at
least had time to burn everything before the Africans living in Zimbabwe
took their land back. However, he admits that he has miscalculated the speed
of the liberation movements and muses that he might have to leave without
having time to burn everything.
Depicting the complicated processes of colonisation the fourth scene,
A World Cut in Two, shows Africans serving white populations who are
lounging poolside while Hill speaks the words of Fanon that describe the state
of despair that colonisation has left the African people in while also pointing
to the envy that this has created within Africans. This envy, Fanon argues,
will spur the colonised to overthrow the coloniser so that they may take those
positions of power back.
A Swedish-American mining company named Lamco is the focus of the
fifth scene, LAMCO, Liberia 1966. After a strike by workers demanding
better working conditions at the Lamco site in Nimba, Liberia the Liberian
government, under pressure from capital interests, sends in troops to support
the arrest of some of the workers and the eviction of other workers from their
homes as punishment for disrupting the flow of business. As the camera spans
out the viewer sees a family dropped off outside the boundaries of Lamco by
Liberian soldiers in the dead of night, left to figure out what is next with the
belongings they managed to pack and their young children.
That Poverty of Spirit, the sixth scene of the film, introduces Fanon’s
critique of religion through an interview with two Swedish missionaries
posted in Tanzania. The interview is awkward because of its unintended
clarity. The missionaries are asked about their role in Tanzania and it quickly
becomes clear that the message they are purporting to spread, ostensibly love
for all people, is simply a guise for another angle of colonisation enacted
through the performance of religion for their definition of a people does
not include the African person. As the sixth scene continues, Fanon’s words
on the erasure of African land rights, the extractive processes that support
capitalist colonial practises and how these conditions sets the ground for
the growth of African resistance are read by Hill. This scene is particularly
poignant because the African viewers will find themselves asking if there is
indeed a difference between the white missionaries and the white filmmaker
through which these stories are being weaved?
The seventh scene, The Fiat G.91: With the FRELIMO in Mozambique
1972, shows archival footage of FRELIMO in the field and interviews with
Review | 119
women freedom fighters alongside the bloodied devastation on the people of

Mozambique by Portuguese colonialists. This is the scene that Spivak refers to
in the preface to the film when she speaks of the image of the young African
woman and her baby, both of whom have been severely injured by Portuguese
attacks. Spivak refers to the woman as “Black Venus” because the images of
her in this scene alluded to the Black Madonna and the Venus de Milo. The
preface, to divert from the seventh scene for a moment, is of significance
because Spivak brings important critiques of how gender is often overlooked
by writers like Fanon and also marginalised by freedom movements once
power has been taken. Though she brings necessary critiques, it is curious
that Spivak is giving the preface and this critique rather than an African
feminist. In a film with very few visible African women speaking, the impact
of a non-African woman giving the preface is heavy. Nevertheless, even if
an African woman had given the preface it would not have been able to
overcome the deep flaws that make this film reiterate the white male gaze
and open old woundings arising from the oppressions of African women and
of African peoples more broadly. The very process of the film itself re-creates
this white voyeurism in a manner that no preface could mitigate.
Now, to return to the seventh scene: The seventh scene is a prime
example of the predatory tones of this film. The body of the African woman,
who Spivak refers to as “Black Venus”, is depicted here, in continuation of
colonial traditions, to service a public spectacle of shock. She is sitting on a
table missing an arm while her baby, who is missing a leg, is feeding on her
exposed breasts. She is visibly uncomfortable as the camera lingers on her and
her injured child. Though there is other footage in the film that also plays on
the trope of shock by depicting the effects of physical violence on the bodies
of African men there is an element of vulnerability and consumption that is
being invoked by the footage of this African woman that we cannot ignore.
Sitting at the intersection of, among others, gender, race, dis/ability, sexuality,
and class, the conditions of colonialism sees to it that the African woman is
open to harm from all sides – not excluding her own people. As she and her
baby sit in their pain the film crew lingers in their consumption of her and
without hearing her and without any sense of reciprocity we, the audience,
watch. Even in the work of exposing colonialism, the visual images exploit
and misrepresent African women as the quintessential, silent, victims of
carnage, invoking sentiments of pity and paternalism among white viewers.
The African woman is the mule of the world, whispers the ghost of Zora Neale
Hurston. What were the processes of consent for the acquiring of the footage
in this film and for its ongoing dissemination? Why is it necessary to show
this footage and whose desires does it appeal to?
The filmmaker argues in various interviews that the footage for the film
was chosen in order to make visible the suffering that colonialism causes
(Timoner, 2014). Once again, the hundreds of thousands of testimonials from
Africans, unfiltered by the white gaze, over the last century are apparently
not enough to have done so. A Swedish, or western, perspective must be the
one framing them in order for the testimonials to be palatable; the stories of
Africans must be cited, or they are not valid, Olsson reminds us. Then, as if
to create a pre-emptive response to the critique of the white gaze so central
to the depiction of the African woman with her baby, the scene following
it, Defeat, shows the death of Portuguese male soldiers. Mournful music
accompanies the image: we are simultaneously invited to observe that we are
not only being shown the carnage of Africans but also of the ‘other’ side while
being, not so subtly, nudged that we should also feel a sympathetic response
to these deaths. The faux disruption of the white gaze breaks here – the
farce can only go on for so long before we return to regular programming.
Concluding this scene is Amilcar Cabral emphasising the importance of
African cultural programs and programmatic infrastructure as a part of the
independence project. Scene nine, Raw Materials, puts into conversation
Fanon’s writings on the need to reclaim our means of production with
Thomas Sankara’s words on resisting neo-colonial practises through ensuring
that our communities are self-sustainable.
Though there are many more aspects of this film worthy of critical analysis,
the critique central to this film review moves beyond this one film, as it is
only symptomatic of a much larger problem. Olsson argues that this film,
and his earlier production, The Black Power Mixtape are not about Africans
but rather are about the Swedish videographers who captured this footage
(Timoner, 2014). The thin veil of this argument would not withstand a light
summer breeze. Olsson, by his own admission, has relationships with these
videographers yet their bodies are not the spectacle that these films hinge
or depend on (Timoner, 2014). It is not that the Swedish videographers are
invisible or even not present in the film. On the contrary, their omnipresence
behind the camera is what continues to centre the power dynamics through
Review | 121
which white supremacy founds itself on. Even though the intended audience
of the film is not African, if we do see the film not only are we watching
archives not held by those whom the footage is of, we are also only being
allowed to see the portions of our stories that non-Africans deem important.
Our stories are being shaped by others yet again. Our memories are being
filtered through, and by Europeans who continue to demonstrate the power
they exercise over the representations of our bodies, our stories, and our
knowledges.
Cultural production is political, a critical component of our freedom
struggles. It is through sites of cultural production and the encounters that
these sites stage that we imagine and begin building our self-determined
decolonial futures. If non-Africans want to fight alongside us, the archives
must be returned to the communities that they depict. This call does not end,
nor begin, with Swedish filmmakers in this case, or with non-African cultural
producers and archivists more generally, but rests primarily with us as Africans
peoples. Simply having the footage returned to us for stewardship is not the
only remedy for transformation. Our own archival practises, modes of cultural
production, and knowledge production, do not exist outside the problematic
power relationships within our communities. Holding the flawed archives of
our past is not enough to change historical narratives, as decolonising the
archive requires that we establish processes of accountability and consent
that we actively and continually weave into the fabrics of our struggles and
visions for freedom. An important conversation needs to be re-opened about
memory, culture and cultural production in the service of pan-Africanism.
All oppressed peoples must be able to maintain control over their own
stories. Archiving is done to retain memory, experiences and knowledges.
Archiving acts as sites for knowledge transmission within communities and
sometimes for knowledge circulation between communities. In terms of radical
pan-African feminist archiving we have to interrogate the practises, usages
and habits of archiving as circulation and transmission. When doing archiving
work with people and communities it is integral that there are clear consent
and accountability processes established between those doing the archiving
and those whose experiences, knowledges, art works and so forth is being
archived – even if one is of and from the community. Some initial questions
that those of us interested in cultural production in service of a radical pan-
Africanism must consider are: What are the purposes of the archival project
and how do they serve the persons and communities involved? What are
processes for dispute resolution and accountability between those archiving
and the persons or communities participating in the archival project? How are
decisions about where the archives will be held made? How are the frameworks
for decision making around the archival project addressing the existing power
dynamics within communities that privilege the voice of some at the expense
of others? How will the archival processes ensure that those whose stories are
being told will retain control? Any answer to these questions would need to
include formulating community accountability measures in which consent
is non-negotiable and an essential component to any collaborative work
that is done. It would also mean a cooperative approach to resource sharing
and distribution. Though these guiding questions are important they also
cannot be understood in abstraction from our broader struggles for self-
determination. Let’s switch the script comrades, the European game is finally
over, we must look for something else.
References
Timoner, O. (Producer). (2014, June 12). Concerning Violence – Lauryn Hill
Narrated Colonialism Documentary [Episode 168]. Bring Your Own Doc.
Podcast retrieved from http://thelip.tv/episode/concerning-violence-lauryn-hill-
narrated-colonialism-documentary/
Review | 123
The Art of Ama Ata Aidoo. Documentary film

(78 minutes). Directed by Yaba Badoe, Fadoa Films
Helen Yitah
The Art of Ama Ata Aidoo, a film directed by award-winning independent

film maker, Yaba Badoe, is the latest addition to recent efforts to celebrate the
renowned literary foremother. The film comes on the heels of the anthology,
Essays in Honour of Ama Ata Aidoo at 70: A Reader in African Cultural
Studies, edited by Anne V. Adams (2012); the colloquium on Ama Ata Aidoo
organised by the University of California, Santa Barbara in the same year; an
honorary doctorate conferred on her by the University of Ghana in 2013; and
a collection of her new and collected poems, After the Ceremonies, which
I compiled, arranged and edited, and which was due to be published by the
African Poetry Book Fund.
Funded through crowd sourcing and produced by Fadoa Films, The Art of
Ama Ata Aidoo was put together by filming Aidoo’s activities over a one year
period during which she paid several visits to her hometown, Abeadzi Kyiakor,
in the Central Region of Ghana. Also included is footage of the launch, in
Accra, of her most recent collection of short stories, Diplomatic Pounds
(2012), and the recent performance of her play, Anowa, by the Theatre
Department of the University of California, Santa Barbara.
As with the events preceding it, The Art of Ama Ata Aidoo bears
testimony to Aidoo’s stature – her glaring celebrity as a writer who, as Jane
Bryce affirms in the film’s prelude, “functions as a front-runner, a forerunner,
a person who can put on the table a series of issues which contemporary
women can deal with, and continue to deal with.” Like Aidoo herself, the
film is understatedly philosophical and bubbles over with new ideas and
impressions about the writer and her oeuvre. Yet in its deft synthesis of
concept, enactment and observation, the film achieves much more in less
than ninety minutes than the earlier honors accorded Aidoo, taking us back
us to Aidoo’s beginnings and charting her life as an African woman and as

a writer.
The beginning of Aidoo’s writerly career, we learn, lies in a number of
influences that galvanised her into creativity: from storytelling by her mother
and by semi-professional tellers, to the art of itinerant preachers, to her school
days at Wesley Girls’ Secondary School where, as a third year student, she was
asked by a teacher what she wanted to do for a career, to which she responded
that she wanted to be a poet. Although the teacher remarked that “poetry
doesn’t feed anybody”, she gave Aidoo an Olivetti typewriter—a symbolic
present that adumbrated Aidoo’s creative calling.
The film’s portrayal of Aidoo’s native town and its culture shows the
strength of its people to battle the exigencies of daily existence, as well as
their good cheer as they go about their daily activities, and the palpable
creative energies that accompany their undertakings. In the absence of the
“stories, happenings, stuff…” that impinged upon the young Aidoo, the
Akokwa Mpanyinsem Kodzifo storytellers demonstrate the wealth of oral
tradition that continues to provide Aidoo with inspiration and source material
for her works, as well as the network of connections between her and her
people.
Another of Aidoo’s experiences that stands out in the rich milieu of literary
activities presented in the film is her confession that her career was launched
by an advertisement about a short story competition in one of Ghana’s
national newspapers. Determined to acquire a pair of shoes that she had seen
in a shop, Aidoo tells that she submitted an entry to the competition, her very
first story prophetically titled “Unto Us a Child Is Born”. She was surprised to
win the prize! From this initial act of sheer bravado, Aidoo has not looked
back. Indeed, as the title of one of her poems in An Angry Letter in January
(1992) boldly declares, “a woman’s voice does not break, it gets firmer”. In
another fortuitous occurrence, in response to a request by the Africanist writer
and scholar, Ulli Beier, Aidoo wrote “In the Cutting of a Drink”, a classic story
later published in her collection, No Sweetness Here (1970).
Of great interest and an overriding concept in the film is the liberated (and
liberating) “space” in which Aidoo flourished as an artist. Aidoo acknowledges
this space as well as her family and her royal lineage: “This whole area is
literally my place in the sense that this is the section of Ghana that I can with
confidence claim is my place”. The space to which she refers is manifested
Review | 125
as much in the slave castles that line Ghana’s coast, as it is in her father’s
imposing mansion, which Aidoo admits looked bigger when she was a young
girl. It is also evident in the vast coastal landscape, made more impressive by
the progressively widening full shot that opens the film.
With each sweep of a wide angle lens, viewers of The Art of Ama Ata
Aidoo are ushered further and deeper into the author’s imaginary worlds,
from the rural and national in No Sweetness Here (1970) to the urban and
global in Diplomatic Pounds (2012). And although Aidoo insists in a recent
interview with Maureen Eke, Vincent Odamtten and Stephanie Newell (2013)
that her stories “reflect not so much my intentions as the period in which
they were produced” (163), it is clear that as a writer she has always been far
ahead of her time.
One of the great temptations one faces in writing about this film is
the urge to emphasise its music and spectacle and its general celebratory
atmosphere, of which there is more than enough to arrest one’s curiosity. Yet
in many ways these aspects reiterate important themes in Aidoo’s oeuvre. For
example, the first few scenes of the film are accompanied with non-diegetic
choral music from the song, “San Bɛfa”, by renowned Ghanaian musician,
Ephraim Amu. Its lyrics tell of a young man, ᴐkofo Kwasi Barima who, in his
hurried quest for material things, neglects what is most essential— his culture,
values, and very identity—for which the singer urges him to return. This song
segues harmoniously into the first of several texts that Aidoo performs in the
film: the final part of her poem, “Speaking of Hurricanes”. Taken from her
collection, An Angry Letter in January (1992), the poem was written “for
Micere Mugo and all other African exiles”. “Ow My Sister”, it begins:
let me lament
my openly beautiful land and her people
who hide good things and bad so well,
only decay and shame become
public,
international.
As with Amu’s song, this poem laments the political and economic upheavals
that have been created on the African continent in the name of progress and
development. Lawrence Boadi (2005) views the name ᴐkofo Kwasi Barima
as an “alien combination [that] symbolically recalls the manner in which…
this nonentity pursues his search”, leaving behind what is essential. Similarly,
Aidoo’s poem takes on the alien forces that have blown away Africans’ hopes
for big and beautiful things—most notably the slave trade. Yet in “Speaking
of Hurricanes”, Aidoo is not sparing in her criticism of “my people”, especially
the tyrants and despots who have left in their wake a brain drain and “women
in various forms of civilised bondage”. Hence her reference in the poem to
“decay and shame”. These are the kinds of issues that Aidoo thinks “might be
controversial, might make people uncomfortable”.
Overall, the success of the documentary comes from its balanced blend
of multiple genres: biographical vignettes by Aidoo herself and by literary
stalwarts such as Anne Adams, Nana Wilson-Tagoe and Jane Bryce who
have worked on Aidoo’s writings; live performances and re-enactments of
Aidoo’s work; interviews; readings, and so on. Aidoo’s self-portraits (though
understated in large part), together with the commentary, testify to her stature
as a pioneer writer who, through her celebration of the complexity of African
femininity, has stood out from the crowd of mainly male African authors.
Through the film, those unfamiliar with Aidoo and her works will gain an
insight into the span of her experience and cultural reach, as well as the
different genres that she has so deftly mastered, including the play, the novel,
the poem and the short story. As Wilson-Tagoe tells us of Aidoo: “She can
write a short story of three pages and give you an entire world”.
Its broad scope, depth and complexity attest that The Art of Ama Ata
Aidoo is not one thing serving one purpose, but multiple things serving
multiple purposes for multiple groups of people. It is, and is likely to remain, a
timeless piece of work, an immemorial presence. With her modest smile, Aidoo
herself quips so often in and of the film: “Isn’t that something?”
References
Adams, Anne, V. ed. 2012. Essays in Honour of Ama Ata Aidoo at 70: A Reader in
African Cultural Studies. Oxfordshire: Ayebia Clarke Publishers.
Aidoo, Ama Ata. 2012. Diplomatic Ponds and Other Stories. Oxfordshire: Ayebia
Clarke Publishers.
Aidoo, Ama Ata. 1992. An Angry Letter in January. Dangaroo Press.
Boadi, Lawrence A. 2005. “The Poetry of Ephraim Amu”, 6th Ephraim Amu Memorial
Lecture, May 2004, published by the Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Review | 127
Legacies and Losses: A Review of Claim No Easy

Victories: The Legacy of Amílcar Cabral.
By Fizone Manji and Bill Fletcher Jr. (eds.), 2013,
CODESRIA and Daraja Press. 2013.
Claudia Gastrow
This collection of essays explores the multifaceted nature of the Amílcar

Cabral’s legacy with the specific goal of understanding his relevance to
contemporary politics. Ranging from his philosophical arguments about
culture and colonialism to more concrete historical explorations of his
impact on African American movements in the United States, the book is
an accessible and valuable introduction to Cabral’s thought. Although the
dedication of more space to questions of gender and his relevance to Africa in
particular would have been welcome, the book provides a rich exploration of
pan-Africanism, internationalism, community organising, education, theories
of revolution and Africana philosophy.
How does one elucidate a legacy? This is at base the question posed by
the collection of thirty-eight essays that constitute this timely book about
the life and work of Amílcar Cabral. As the independence leader of Guinea
Bissau and Cabo Verde (until his assassination on 20 January 1973) Cabral
sits alongside Frantz Fanon, Walter Rodney, Steve Biko, Thomas Sankara and
Kwame Nkrumah as one of those rare figures that represents the meeting of
revolutionary practice and deep philosophical thought. He interrogated topics
ranging from revolution, nationalism, the politics of culture and history, pan-
Africanism, the colonial and post-colonial state, and the question of class in
colonial societies. His writing was prolific and his actions great. Nevertheless,
as many of the contributors point out, his name seems to have slipped
from the tongues of academics, activists, and politicians. It is precisely this
historical elision that these articles seek to counter.
The collection opens with a preface by Mireille Fanon-Mendès France
who insightfully lays out the social, political and philosophical conditions
that make the collection an urgent contribution. The dream of flourishing
democracies that would be driven by the experiences and the needs of those
most oppressed during the colonial period has failed to materialise. Instead,
a series of abusive leaders and the growing power of neoliberal agendas
have caused the disintegration of early aspirations for liberation. But what
constitutes liberation in the contemporary moment? What resources can
people today, in Africa and around the world, draw on to imagine and
enact their desires? Writing that Cabral foresaw the “deceptive dawn of
African independence”, Fanon-Mendès France argues that Cabral’s project of
“building a new humanity” is therefore especially relevant to today’s need to
remake political life and institutions.
Echoing Fanon-Mendès France’s belief in the contemporary relevance
of Cabral’s political philosophy, Manji and Fletcher, in their introduction
to the book, state that the collection seeks to understand Cabral in “four-
dimensional view”, with the fourth dimension being “time” or “context”.
This statement is one of the central pillars of the book as essays tend to
either contextualise Cabral’s own historic moment, explore his argument that
revolutionary thought and practice must be based in the historical conditions
in which people find themselves, or have a comparative aspect either across
discipline, region, or time in an effort to extend Cabral’s significance beyond
his context. The book thereby ushers Cabral out of his moment and into
our present, where his words are so vital for rethinking revolution and the
conditions for emancipation. It provides insight about his influence in such
diverse realms as US Black activism, Africana philosophy, education policy,
and Marxist thought. The result is a rich introduction to Cabral’s writings,
especially useful for those previously unfamiliar with his work.
To guide the reader, the book has been thematically divided into seven
sections, namely “Introduction”, “Legacy”, “Reflections”, “Women and
Emancipation”, “Pan-Africanism”, “Culture and Education”, and “Cabral
and the African American Struggle”. In “Legacy” the reader is given a basic
introduction to the historical context in which Cabral was writing. Essays by
Nigel Gibson, Mustafah Dhada, Reiland Rabaka, Richard A. Lobban Jr, Ameth
Lo, and Samir Amin, provide insight into Cabral’s biography, the context
of anti-colonial struggles, and the central tenants of his thought such as
his “weapons of theory” argument, the nuances of his call to “return to
the source”, the question of “class suicide”, commitments to and criticisms
of pan-Africanism, and his analysis of Marxism. Of special note is Carlos
Review | 129
Schwarz’s detailed account of Cabral’s work as an agronomist. Through this

he delicately shows how Cabral’s agronomy experiences provided the basis
of his political thought and praxis in Guinea Bissau. The paper “Sons of the
Soil” interestingly locates Cabral’s thought within a comparative framework
with Portugal by juxtaposing Cabral’s ideas and actions with the writings of
José Saramago. In doing this, it reveals how Cabral has seeped into Portuguese
critiques of their own material and political conditions. The understanding
of the anger of Portuguese peasants is framed in relation to the actions
of anti-colonial fighters in Guinea Bissau. The categories through which
Portuguese revolutionary practice are comprehended, therefore emanate from
the former colonies. Excellent pieces for understanding Cabral’s links to other
African thinkers include Helmi Sharawy’s exploration of African-Arab relations
and Aziz Salamone Fall’s essay which tragically investigates the crushing of
revolutionary potential across Africa.
The second section, “Reflections”, dwells further on the topics introduced
in the previous section. Essays by Lewis R. Gordon and Jacques Depelchin
draw on Cabral’s writings to address questions of epistemology, the
difficulty of defining political conditions, and the significance of rethinking
contemporary capitalism in relation to the remaking of the human. Wangui
Kimari, William Minter, Maria Problet, Adrian Harewood, Filament Lopes
and Demba Moussa Dembélé investigate the details of political organising,
significance of “returning to the source” for the African diaspora, and trace
the internationalist dimensions of how Cabral’s work has been taken up.
In a very moving interview, Augusta Henriques and Miguel Barros explore
the intergenerational experiences, senses of loss, and political concerns of
Guinea Bissauans. The two speakers work through their disappointments with
Guinea’s Bissau’s independence and try to grapple with what the future holds,
especially in relation to the dreams which Cabral’s words proffered an earlier
generation.
The final four sections address specific topics in relation to Cabral’s
thought. The section on “Women and Emancipation” while excellent, is
surprisingly short at just two articles. The first, by Stephanie Urdang, is a
personal account of the experiences (and eventual failure) of actions taken
towards women’s emancipation during the anti-colonial struggle in Guinea
Bissau. The second, by Patrícia Godinho Gomes, is an account of the history
of movements and policies aimed at improving the position of women in
post-independence Guinea Bissau. Both of these essays are rich resources for
readers seeking an introduction to the question of gender in Guinea Bissau.
However, given that Cabral was one of the few male anti-colonial thinkers in
his questioning of the “gender-blind” and patriarchal nationalism that many
African countries embraced, one would have expected that more space be
dedicated to the question of gender within the collection.
Section five on pan-Africanism situates Cabral’s thought within a nexus of
anti-colonial Black political theorists. Essays by Patricia Rodney et al, David
Austin, Amrit Wilson, Perry Mars, and Explo Nani-Kofi therefore include
comparisons of his and Walter Rodney’s thought, and links between his
thought and Caribbean thinkers such as Fanon and CLR James. This section
attentively grapples with the difficulties of building pan-Africanist solidarities
across historically varied experiences of oppression, the problematics of
Caribbean imaginations of Africa, and the difficulties of building pan-
Africanism in a post-colonial era focused on nation-states. The section on
Education includes an original reflection on the question of difference in
Cabral’s writings by Olúfémi Táíwo. He draws on Cabral’s warnings against
portraying reified tradition as a source of authenticity, to argue against
the turn to essentialised practices and beliefs as representative of “some
unique one-of-a-kind African culture” (278). He instead calls for a politics
steeped in a recognition of change and history in Africa. Contributions also
include essays by Brandon Lundy and N. Barney Pityana that investigate the
importance of context and culture in designing educational practices, and an
exploration by Miguel de Barros and Redy Wilson Lima of the remaking of
Cabral’s words in contemporary Guinean and Capeverdean rap music as a form
of memory-making and political subversion
The last section of the collection investigates the significance of
Cabral’s works to African Americans. Papers by Bill Fletcher Jr, Kali Akuno,
Ajamu Baraka, Makungu M. Akinyele, and Walter Turner focus on Cabral’s
contribution to promoting internationalism within African American politics,
reveal how his work created a space for the Black left to embrace a Marxist
critique of US racism, and investigate his impact on specific African American
movements such as the Black Panthers and the House of Umoja. The
collection closes with a short piece by Angela Davis who draws on Cabral’s
writings to ask the readers to think of a struggle that moves beyond militarism
and violence, to a substantial remaking of consciousness – the need to build
Review | 131
of a new humanity as Fanon-Mendès France had reminded the reader at the

outset of the collection.
While the collection is extremely comprehensive, strangely enough, very
little of it explicitly focuses on Cabral’s significance for Africa. While there are
discussions of his historical connections to activists and thinkers in Angola,
Mozambique, Guinea, and Zanzibar among others, the attempt to think
through his legacy appears to focus more on the Caribbean and the US than
contemporary Africa, where arguably his ideas are more needed than ever.
From xenophobic violence in South Africa to the African Union’s turning of a
blind eye to repression in Ethiopia, Angola, Eritrea, Swaziland and Zimbabwe,
and increasing restrictions on movements of Africans both inside and outside
the African continent, topics such as African migration, political democracy in
Africa, and the ongoing legacies of settler colonialism would have been fertile
areas for this collection to explore. Their absence is a notable lacuna in an
otherwise valuable and interesting contribution.
Nonetheless, the collection overall provides an excellent introduction to
Cabral’s thought. Some readers might find frustrating that the essays are
decidedly mixed in terms of their presumed audiences – while some are deeply
philosophical, others are far more practical, focusing on the everyday work
of organising. Readers should centre their attention on what in the book
they are seeking out as it is unlikely that all essays will be equally appealing
to their interests. The book should not therefore be approached as simply
an academic reflection about Cabral’s writings, but rather a real attempt to
explore, as indicated at the beginning of the review, the multifaceted nature
of Cabral’s contemporary legacy. As a collection it is a timely one and will be
valuable for anyone seeking to be introduced or reacquainted with debates
about revolution, colonialism and culture, nationalism, and pan-Africanism.
Contributors
Issue Co-Editors
Hakima Abbas is a political scientist, policy analyst and activist. She has
been active in struggles for social justice for over fifteen years. Her work as a
trainer, strategist and researcher has focused on strengthening and supporting
movements for transformation in Africa and the Middle East. Hakima is the
editor and author of various publications and articles, including: Africa’s Long
Road to Rights, Aid to Africa: Redeemer or Coloniser? (with Yves Niyiragira),
From Roots to Branches: The African Diaspora in a Union Government for
Africa, People-led Transformation: African futures and the Queer African
Reader (with Sokari Ekine). She is on the editorial collective of The Feminist
Wire and serves as a board member to the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation,
Eastern Africa office, the African Sex Workers Alliance and Greenpeace Africa.
Amina Mama, founding editor of Feminist Africa, researcher, scholar and

feminist, has worked in various European, African and U.S. tertiary institutions,
developing transformative research and teaching methodologies. She authored
Beyond the Masks: Race, Gender and Subjectivity (Routledge 1995), many
articles, and co-edited Engendering African Social Sciences (CODESRIA
1997). Following ten years as the University of Cape Town’s first Chair in
Gender Studies (1999-2009), she was the first Barbara Lee Distinguished
Chair at Mills College (2007-2009). She is currently Professor in Women and
Gender Studies and Director of the Feminist Research Institute at University
of California, Davis. Key teaching and research areas are feminist theory and
methodology, colonialism, militarism, globalisation, and women’s movements.
Simidele Dosekun, Reviews Editor, has a PhD in gender and cultural studies
from King’s College London and will be taking up a postdoctoral fellowship
at the London School of Economics in September 2015. Her current research
concerns new styles of feminine dress and subjectivity among young Nigerian
women in the city of Lagos. She is a member of the Feminist Africa editorial
team and will be guest editing a forthcoming issue of the journal on fashion
and beauty politics in Africa.
Contributors 18 | 133
Contributors
Kerubo Abuya is a leadership development, organisational and transformation
scholar-practitioner of a humanistic-values striving to inspire-enable more
humane, equitable and sustainable social/human activity systems. A PhD candidate
at Saybrook University studying ‘Organisational Systems’. Areas of interest include
but are not limited to the intersection of leadership, organizational/community
culture, human rights, gender justice, systems thinking, transformation,
organizing and transformative learning based interventions for social change. A
human rights, gender equity and social activist, participatory/action researcher,
educator, organizer, communications expert, writer, poet, performance artist;
Kerubo is a proud mother of one daughter.
Josephine Ahikire is Associate Professor and Dean of the School of Women

and Gender Studies at Makerere University. She is also a Senior Research
Fellow at the Centre for Basic Research. Josephine has wide experience in
research and has extensively published in the area of Feminist Political Theory
and Cultural Studies. She is the author of the book: Localised or Localising
Democracy: Gender and the Politics of Decentralisation in Contemporary
Uganda (2007) and Co-editor of Gender, Poverty and Social Transformation:
Examining Fractures and Continuities in Contemporary Uganda (2014).
Peace Musiimenta holds a PhD (Gender Studies), a MA (Women Studies) and

a BA (Education – upper class division) all from Makerere University, Uganda.
Peace has wide experience in training and teaching at different levels and
currently teaches and coordinates undergraduate programmes in the School of
Women and Gender Studies at Makerere University. Peace represents the School
of Women and Gender Studies on the Uganda Women’s Network (UWONET).
Peace is a senior researcher who has done many researches individually and
collaboratively. Some of the research includes: Redefined Subordination:
Interrogating the Lived Experiences of Educated Women in Contemporary
Urban Uganda (2014); Uganda@50: Amplifying Citizens’ Voices Project - Centre
for Basic Research (CBR) (2013); Strengthening Women’s Participation in Local
Governance and Capacity to Demand for Accountability at Local Government
level in Busia district Uganda under the Institute for Social Transformation (IST);
Towards Effective Participation of Women in Multiparty Politics in Uganda:
Documenting Experiences in 2006 Elections.
Amon Ashaba Mwiine is an Assistant Lecturer at the School of Women and

Gender Studies, Makerere University. He graduated with a Bachelor of Social
Sciences (First Class) in 2005; a MA Gender Studies (MAK) in 2011. He is a PhD
Student at Makerere University, focusing on the question of Men in Parliament
while interrogating the influence of masculinities in the Legislative Processes
and the plausible role of men in championing gender sensitive legislations.
Amon has eight years experience in teaching and research in Gender
mainstreaming, Masculinities and Development. He has also done research
and training in gender and education, Shame, exclusion and how these widen
prospects of poverty. His recent publication is a book chapter on “Poverty the
invisible and inseparable ‘shadow’: Reflections from the media and the better
off in rural Uganda” in Chase, E and Bantebya-Kyomuhendo (eds) 2015.
Poverty and Shame: Global Experiences, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gabeba Baderoon is the author of Regarding Muslims: from slavery to post-

apartheid (Wits, 2014) and the poetry collections The Dream in the Next Body
and A hundred silences. She received a PhD in English from the University
of Cape Town, and has held fellowships in the African Gender Institute, the
Nordic Africa Institute, and the Centre for Contemporary Islam. Gabeba is an
Associate Professor of Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies and African
Studies at Pennsylvania State University, and an Extraordinary Professor
of English at Stellenbosch University. She co-directs the African Feminist
Initiative at Penn State.
Cheryl Hendricks is the Head of the Department of Politics and International

Relations at the University of Johannesburg (UJ). Prior to her appointment
at UJ, she was a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Security Studies.
She holds a Doctorate in Government and International Relations from the
University of South Carolina and a Masters in Southern African Studies from
the University of York, England.
Her research interests are on Gender, Peace and Security, Security Sector
Reform, Human Security and Peacebuilding. She currently teaches courses on
International Conflict and Co-operation and Peace and Security in Africa. She
has worked extensively with civil society organisations on gender and security
in Africa.
Juliet Kamwendo received her initial teacher training in Malawi. She then
proceeded to earn B. Ed (University of Botswana) and M. Ed (Gender Studies)
also from the same university. Her paper published in the current volume of
Feminist Africa had its earlier version initially presented in 2011 at a conference
on African Renaissance, Integration, Unity and Development hosted by UNISA
in Pretoria. She is currently pursuing her PhD in gender studies.
Gregory Kamwendo is a Malawian national and currently works in the School

of Education at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. He took special
interest in women leaders when his home country (Malawi) became the first
country in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) to have a
woman president.
Luam Kidane is an African communications strategist, curator and writer. Luam’s

research, writing and work examines contemporary African movement building
at the intersections of communications, decolonial aesthetics, Indigenous
governance models, art, articulations of self-determination, and media.
Delali Kumavie is in the Ph.D programme in English and African Studies at

Northwestern University in Chicago. Last year, she was an International Fellow
with the American Association of University Women. Her research interests
include: African women’s literature and culture, migration and transnationality
and contemporary cultural phenomenon in Ghana and West Africa.
Lyn Ossome is a researcher in feminist political economy, specialising in

land and agrarian studies, political theory, labour sociology, and postcolonial
feminist studies. She currently holds a postdoctoral fellowship position at the
Unit for the Humanities at Rhodes University.
Brenda Nyandiko Sanya is an advanced Ph.D student at the University of

Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Brenda holds a dual B.A. in Philosophy and
Psychology, and an interdisciplinary M.A. in Gender/Cultural Studies. Broadly,
her current research explores discretionary implementation of immigration laws
with a focus on race, gender, and sexuality. She researches formal and informal
structures as spaces where identities, rights, and documentation are contested,
produced, and reproduced, and circulated in and through global landscapes.
Anne Namatsi Lutomia is a doctoral student of Human Resource Development

with a minor in Gender and Women’s Studies at the University of Illinois,
Urbana-Champaign. She received her MA in Non-profit Management from
Hamline University in Minnesota. Anne completed her Bachelor in Education
in French and Secretarial Studies at Kenyatta University. Her research interest
spans gender, race, labour mobility, leadership development and community
based non-profits. Her current research focuses on social capital formation
and leadership development amongst new non-profit leaders of small
community based non-profits.
The Weaving Kenya Women’s Collective (“The Weavers”) is a feminist

collective formed in 2012 as a staging ground for women’s collaborative and
cooperative creativity. In a cyber-space anchored in Nairobi in 2014, a group
from amongst “The Weavers” convened the virtual round-table that was the
genesis for this essay, in order to revisit ideas of belonging and identity, and
to see what happens if - and when - we take women’s lives, experiences, and
memories seriously as a mode of being-in-the world.
Participants: Akitelek Mboya, Aleya Kassam, Dayo Foster, Garnette Olouch-
Olunya, Kerubo Abuya, Marziya Mohammedali, Mshaï Mwangola, Ngwatilo
Mawiyoo, Wambui Mwangi, Wangui wa Goro and Wanjiru Kamau-Rutenberg.
Sehin Teferra has just submitted her PhD thesis titled: A feminist analysis
of violence against sex workers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Following a year’s
coursework at the Centre for Gender Studies at SOAS, Sehin conducted
her fieldwork research and completed her write-up while raising two small
children. In the last year, Sehin has also co-founded a feminist project -
Setaweet (‘Of Woman’) - which engages with schools and the non-profit
sector to challenge gender inequality in Ethiopia. Setaweet provides feminist
training and research and its hallmark project is the #Arif Wond (‘Good Man’)
campaign which challenges normative masculinity in the Ethiopian context.
Helen Yitah is Associate Professor and Head of the Department of English at

the University of Ghana. Her research interests are in postcolonial and gender
identity in literature. She has published work on oral and written African
literature, American literature and children’s literature in Ghana. Her recent
publications include: New Perspectives on African Humanity: Beliefs, Values
& Artistic Expression (2014), which she co-edited, as well as critical essays
in The Journal of Postcolonial Writing, The Southern Quarterly and The
Journal of African Cultural Studies.
A publication of the Websites
African Gender Institute www.agi.ac.za/journals
University of Cape Town www.agi.ac.za
Harry Oppenheimer Institute Building

Engineering Mall
University of Cape Town
Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701

South Africa
Tel: +27 21 650 2970
Fax: +27 21 650 4840
E-mail: genderstudies@uct.ac.za

Pan-Africanism and Feminism

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pan-Africanism and Feminism

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pan-Africanism and Feminism

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose of Feminist Africa?

What is the purpose of Feminist Africa?

What is the editorial policy of Feminist Africa?

What is the editorial policy of Feminist Africa?

Issue 20 | 2015

Feminism and Pan Africanism

Issue 20: July 2015

First published in 2015 by the

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in

Published with the support of the African Women’s Development Fund.

Typesetting, printing and cover design: COMPRESS.dsl | www.compress.dsl.com

Distribution: AGI staff

Feminist Africa is a scholarly journal accredited by the

Editorial policy Editor

Manuscript submissions Distribution

Copyright and reproduction

Editorial: Feminism and Pan-Africanism

 aking a Difference: Embracing the challenge of women’s

 ma Ata Aidoo’s Woman-Centred Pan-Africanism:

Archives and Collective Memories: Searching for African

Migrant Women of Johannesburg: Everyday Life

In Idi Amin’s Shadow: Women, Gender and Militarism

 oncerning Violence: Nine Scenes from the Anti-Imperialistic

 he Art of Ama Ata Aidoo

Claim No Easy Victories: The Legacy of Amílcar Cabral

Editorial: Feminism and Pan-Africanism

This 20th issue of FA sets out to continue documenting and reflecting

with nationalist, patriarchal, anti-feminist rhetoric that all too many of us

challenges still remain. Pan-African discourses without class and gender

continental organising have always been significant, particularly in relation

In Search of the State?

and autonomy of traders, and their collective impact as non-state economic

and political constraints which neoliberalism places upon states – critically

and yield meagre incomes. Solutions offered to enhance the profitability of

formal sector workers, in employer-employee relationships, and already the

structured, and subsumed in mainstream labour rights discourse. A significant

Feminist perspectives on African labour informalisation

raises the question of whether the focus on assistance to women-headed

2006: 4). The language of ‘growth’ and ‘entrepreneurship’ as a means of

Pan-Africanism and neoliberal constraints on state responses

acontextually. This in itself requires thinking beyond a Western-centred global

and explaining global relationships from the perspective of Africans. At its

rural livelihoods still depend. Historical accounts of colonialism in countries

operating outside of organised collectives and not covered under conventional

neoliberal experiments in the continent could also be explained by the variety

Chatterjee, Ipsita (2012), ‘Feminism, the false consciousness of neoliberal capitalism?

Making a Difference: Embracing the challenge

women’s political leadership and the women’s movement been positioned in

Registering Women’s Mark in Political Leadership

The increased presence of women in Ugandan political institutions has

People’s Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa5 is instructive. States have

Understanding the obstacles

Multiparty Politics and Patronage

The Crippling Effect of Sexual Pacification8

proceed. He had focused on my abdomen not even my mouth and what

From a systemic perspective, whether or not women give in to these sexual

The Political Costs of Dismantling Patriarchy

The Nexus between Women Political Leaders and the

Parties and Organizations”. This was subsequently followed by an updated

Without a more systematic approach it may be unrealistic to expect women

aking a Difference: Embracing the challenge of women’s

ma Ata Aidoo’s Woman-Centred Pan-Africanism:

In Idi Amin’s Shadow: Women, Gender and Militarism

oncerning Violence: Nine Scenes from the Anti-Imperialistic

he Art of Ama Ata Aidoo

In Search of the State?