2.1 Multiple Equilibria and Latent Comparative Advantage
2.1 Multiple Equilibria and Latent Comparative Advantage
2.1 Multiple Equilibria and Latent Comparative Advantage
! ; L 2 Þ%
l2 ½1 þ aMinðL
with a > 0. The term 1 þ aMinðL ! ; L 2 Þ captures Marshallian externalities that are
increasing with industry-wide employment, L2, but that are exhausted once the labor
force in a sector reaches the level L ! . The term y & 1 þ aL ! > 1 can be seen as the max-
4
imum benefits of clustering in sector 2. We assume that the total labor supply in South
is higher than L! , so that if there is complete specialization in good 2 then productivity
is yl2.
Let p'i be the international price of good i and let p' & p'2 =p'1 . Let us derive a con-
dition under which there are multiple equilibria, with one equilibrium characterized by
complete specialization in good 1 and the other by complete specialization in good 2.
We first check that specialization in good 1 is an equilibrium. Letting w denote the
wage in South, then w ¼ l1 p'1 if South is specialized in good 1. The unit cost of pro-
ducing good 2 in South given that all labor is devoted to production of good 1 (and
hence no benefits of clustering are realized) is w/l2. Hence complete specialization
in good 1 is an equilibrium if and only if l1/l2 ) p' . Similarly, complete specialization in
good 2 implies p'2 ¼ w=yl2 , and hence this is an equilibrium if and only if l1/l2 * yp' .
Thus, there is multiple equilibria if and only if the following condition holds,
Without loss of generality, in the following discussion we restrict attention to the case in
which this condition holds with strict inequalities. If there are multiple equilibria, which