Quality Progress Magazine (April-2007)
Quality Progress Magazine (April-2007)
PLUS:
Launching Lean
Six Sigma p. 51
Using Youden Plots p. 64
There’s statgraphics …
®
then there is
EVERYTHING else.
Think you are using the best
statistical software because it calls
itself the leader?
Think Again.
The most widely used product is not always
the superior one. It may simply have a
bigger advertising budget.
lets
you perform advanced
routines effortlessly,
without sacrificing
reliability. It gives you
functionality absent in
other stat programs.
Refine Processes.
Enhance Performance.
Improve Quality.
©2007 StatPoint, Inc.
Increase Profit. STATGRAPHICS is a registered trademark of StatPoint, Inc.
STATGRAPHICS Centurion is a trademark of StatPoint, Inc.
Please visit us at Booth #6611 at Quality Expo, September 25 - 27 in Rosemont (Chicago), Illinois
You’re there.
You’re here, you’re there, you’re in places you’ve never been, discovering things you never expected.
®
With JMP software, you don’t just see your data. You explore it. You experience it. You understand it.
JMP statistical discovery software is dynamic, interactive and fun. It’s data exploration at its best.
It’s data visualization from SAS. www.jmp.com/there
SAS, JMP, and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc. in the USA and other countries. ® indicates USA registration. Other brand and product names are trademarks of their respective companies. Copyright © 2007, all rights reserved. 435463US_0607
Contents AUGUST 2007 I VOLUME 40 NUMBER 8
F E AT U R E S
OUTSOURCING
CASE STUDY
GLOBAL QUALITY
SMALL BUSINESS
EDUCATION
• Web Watch.
51 Deployment: Start Off on the Right Foot
Simple preparation and pre-work before beginning a lean Six Sigma
• Author guidelines.
project can clear the way for a positive outcome.
• Searchable database of ASQ
abstracts. ROBIN GATES, management consultant, Middleton, WI
12 Keeping Current
Article Submissions
Free QP Live
Subscribe to our free electronic newsletter,
Associate Editor
MARK EDMUND
Brian Hindo’s article decries Six Sigma’s core tenets as damaging to corpo-
Assistant Editor
rate creativity: “When these types of initiatives become ingrained in a DAVE NELSEN
company’s culture, as they did at 3M, creativity can easily be squelched,” he Manuscript Coordinator
wrote, referring to the methodology’s process focus. VALERIE FUNK
While the author at least went through the mo- Editor at Large
SUSAN E. DANIELS
tions in his research for the article—he spoke at
Contributing Editor
length to two ASQ board members who are Six NICOLE ADRIAN
Sigma subject matter experts—he conspicuously Copy Editors
omitted their comments from his story. They had SUSAN GRONEMUS
KELLY SULLIVAN
given Hindo examples of companies using Six
Sigma as foundations for business success—organi- Art Director
MARY UTTECH
zations where, at the same time, innovation was
Graphic Designer
alive and well. SANDY WYSS
One might assume that these experts’ points, however salient, didn’t jive Production
with the writer’s preconceived notions of Six Sigma as it relates to innovation. CATHY SCHNACKENBERG
The article’s assertion is that, by nature, the two simply cannot co-exist. Advertising Production
BARBARA MITROVIC
When the article appeared on BusinessWeek’s website, www.businessweek.
Digital Production Specialists
com/magazine/content/07_24/b4038406.htm, readers fired back. ERIC BERNA, LAURA FRANCESCHI
“Take care not to bash Six Sigma,” one said. “The problem is not with
the methodology itself but rather with how it is applied and what specifi- Account Executives
ANGELA M. MITCHELL
cally it is applied to … If managed effectively, Six Sigma can absolutely MITCHELL PEZANOSKI
co-exist with innovation!”
Classified/Recruitment Advertising
Many echoed the sentiment, even while the sources interviewed for the RAMONA GARCIA
“You cannot create in that atmosphere of confinement or sameness,” cur- Editorial and Advertising Offices
414-272-8575 fax 414-272-1734
rent 3M CEO George Buckley says in the article. “Perhaps one of the
mistakes that we made as a company—it’s one of the dangers of Six ASQ ADMINISTRATION
Executive Director
Sigma—is that when you value sameness more than you value creativity, I PAUL E. BORAWSKI
think you potentially undermine the heart and soul of a company like 3M.” Managing Directors
CHRISTOPHER D. BAUMAN
What’s your experience? Can Six Sigma and innovation work within the
BRIAN J. LEHOUILLIER
same four walls? Write to me, editor@asq.org, or post your comments on the MICHELLE MASON
QP discussion board at www.asq.org/discussionBoards (case sensitive). To promote discussion of issues in the field of quality and ensure
coverage of all responsible points of view, Quality Progress pub-
lishes articles representing conflicting and minority views.
Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily
of ASQ or Quality Progress. Use of the ASQ logo in advertisements
does not necessarily constitute endorsement of that particular
product or service by ASQ.
Seiche Sanders
Editor
W ES F ULTON
able risk based upon the available Lou Ann Lathrop, General Motors
STUDY: Pay-for-Performance
Not Leading to Improvement
A study by the Duke Clinical Research Institute
concluded that the Center for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) pay-for-performance pilot program
has not resulted in significant improvement in quality
of care or outcomes in hospital patients with acute
myocardial infarction (heart attack).
The three-year study compared 54 hospitals in the
CMS pilot program with 446 control hospitals. CMS’s
pay-for-performance program, which was launched in 2003, gives financial bonuses to hospitals scoring in
the top 20% in any of five clinical areas, including acute myocardial infarction, as measured by numerous
standardized quality indicators.
CMS and Premier Inc., a nationwide group purchasing organization of hospitals collaborating with CMS in
the pilot project, recently published preliminary results for the first two years of the pay-for-performance pro-
gram. They reported significant improvement for all five clinical conditions being monitored.
However, unlike the study conducted by the Duke researchers, this evaluation did not compare the hospi-
tals in the pilot program with hospitals not receiving financial incentives. The ability to draw conclusions
about the direct impact of the pay-for-performance program on quality improvement was therefore limited.
The study, “Pay for Performance, Quality of Care, and Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction,” ap-
peared in the Journal of the American Medical Assn. and is available at http:/ / jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/
content/short/297/21/2373.
FOOD SAFETY
Web Watch
This month’s Web Watch focuses on organizations outside the United States.
For more quality related websites, visit www.asq.org/links.
ASQ News
EACH ONE REACH ONE SURPASSES GOAL The Each One Reach One (EORO) member
recruitment program has surpassed its 5,700-member year-end goal. There were 6,043 members
recruited through the program in the last fiscal year. This is an increase of 13.5% over the previous
year. For more information on the EORO program, go to www.asq.org/eoro/index.html.
TEAM COMPETITION ENTRIES DUE Entries for the International Team Excellence Award
competition are due Sept. 3. Team finalists will participate in live competitions during ASQ’s World
Conference on Quality and Improvement, May 5-7, 2008, in Houston. For more information and to
view the 2007 presentations, go to http://wcqi.asq.org/team-competition/index.html.
MEDALS NOMINATION DEADLINE MOVED UP The awards board has moved the nomina-
tion deadline for ASQ awards from Nov. 1 to Oct. 1, allowing the board to name the award winners in
November instead of December. The purpose is to give ASQ and the winners’ companies more time
to promote the names of the winners before the awards are handed out in the spring. For more infor-
mation, go to www.asq.org/about-asq/awards/index.html or e-mail Trish Borzon at tborzon@asq.org.
PROGRAM AWARDS LARGEST GRANT TO DATE The Community Good Works (CGW) pro-
gram awarded a $15,000 grant to the Partnership for Education in Ashtabula County, OH. The funding
will be used to implement community and school partnerships in Ashtabula County school districts.
This is the largest grant ever awarded by the CGW program. For more information about the CGW
program, go to www.asq.org/about-asq/what-we-do/goodworks.html.
DIVISION OFFERING CQA REFRESHER COURSE The Audit Division will hold a certified
quality auditor (CQA) refresher course Oct. 9-10 in Atlanta. The purpose is to prepare participants for
the CQA exam, which will be administered Oct. 13, following the Audit Division conference. The cost
is $595. Participants will receive a copy of The ASQ Auditing Handbook, third edition. For more infor-
mation or to register, go to www.asq.org/courses/cqa-refresher.html.
DIVISIONS CO-SPONSORING CONFERENCE Two ASQ divisions are among the sponsors of
the 51st Fall Technical Conference, Oct. 10-13 in Jacksonville, FL. The conference is jointly sponsored
by ASQ’s Chemical and Process Industries Division, the Statistics Division, and the American
Statistical Assn.’s sections on Physical and Engineering Sciences and Quality & Productivity. For
more information, go to www.eng.fsu.edu/ftc2007.
Using FMEA
To Assess
Outsourcing Risk
by Cliff Welborn
O
utsourcing has become a growing trend
among many U.S. companies.1 Two com- U.S. workforce.2 Lower costs are often the dri-
mon examples of the practice are out- ving factor, and there have been many success
sourcing IT jobs to India and outsourcing product stories of companies that enter this global supply
manufacturing to China. Some say the practice is a chain and realize significant cost savings.3, 4
However, outsourcing does not guarantee
business success. There is risk involved and not
In 50 Words all sides benefit from such arrangements.5
Or Less The advantages of outsourcing should be care-
fully weighed against risk and must go beyond
• Outsourcing has become common for many U.S. evaluating just price. So much more goes into
judging the business impact of an outsourcing
businesses, but assessing the risk involved in
decision. Without a systematic analysis technique
such arrangements hasn’t. to assess risk, much can go wrong: unexpected
cost, extended lead times, poor quality or other
• A modified version of failure mode effects negative performance variables.
analysis (FMEA) is one way businesses can Risk Assessment Basics
evaluate the risk of outsourcing options. Indeed, risk associated with outsourcing can
offset the often more publicized benefits.6
• Risk priority numbers can be calculated to rate Sometimes the risk doesn’t pay off. Some U.S.
companies have joined the outsourcing trend
any potential failures.
only to be disappointed in the overall net effect
rts
ct
ct
ct
st
st
es
od
tu
os
co
co
fe
fe
fe
common occurrence, the op-
pa
oc
go
ar
de
de
de
tc
n
g
st
pr
io
o
en
of
in
al
ic
ic
iti
portunity score is 5. The prob-
ct
n
g
at
ur
et
et
em
ns
tio
rin
le
tio
m
sm
sm
ct
tra
se
uc
ag
tu
rta
fit
co
co
od
ac
or
an
St
en
t
po
no
or
or
nd
pr
uf
m
se
likelihood that the risk will
ns
aj
in
an
ve
ill
en
re
M
tra
yi
w
fo
se
en
actually happen.
la
nt
Un
n
re
se
De
yi
yi
ne
fo
re
la
la
The severity score indicates
po
Un
De
fo
De
m
Un
Co
ponent will not fit with mating parts—requiring 1. J.K. Liker and T.Y. Choi, “Building Deep Supplier
rework.” Its RPN was 40. The new vendor would Relationships,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82, No. 12,
be producing many different fixture components pp. 104-113.
that would have to connect to components made 2. T.J. Rodgers, “The Truth About Outsourcing,” IEEE
by other vendors. There was a concern that com- Design and Test of Computers, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 12-13.
ponents from two different vendors would have 3. H.L. Lee, “The Triple A Supply Chain,” Harvard Bus-
dimensional discrepancies resulting in a poor fit. iness Review, Vol. 82, No. 10, pp. 102-112.
4. R.E. Slone, “Leading a Supply Chain Turnaround,” Har-
With this quantified risk assessment, RSSF’s
vard Business Review, Vol. 82, No. 10, pp. 114-121.
management team implemented mitigation
5. P.J. Singh, A. Smith and A.S. Sohal, “Strategic Supply
efforts. A small product/process development
Chain Management Issues in the Automotive Industry: An
team was established to ensure smooth opera- Australian Perspective,” International Journal of Production
tions with the new vendor. This three-person Research, Vol. 43, No. 16, pp. 3,375-3,399.
team made several trips to the vendor’s location 6. Mohammed H.A. Tafti, “Risk Factors Associated with
in Asia. Focus was on the development of a sys- Offshore IT Outsourcing,” Industrial Management & Data
tem to manage business transactions, such as Systems, Vol. 105, No. 5, 2005, pp. 549-560.
communication of orders, schedules, payments, 7. Lee, “The Triple A Supply Chain,” Harvard Business
returns and repairs. Review, see reference 3.
Additionally, the representatives from RSSF 8. Brad Stone, “Should I Stay or Should I Go?” Newsweek,
and the new vendor met to establish clear product April 19, 2004, pp. 52-53.
specifications. Samples from RadioShack’s exist- 9. Roshan R. Pai, Venkata R. Kallepalli, Reggie J. Caudill
and MengChu Zhou, “Methods Toward Supply Chain Risk
ing product stock were sent to the new vendor to
Analysis,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on
verify fit conformity. In some cases, the mating
Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 5, 2003, pp. 4,560-4,565.
parts that were not to be produced by the vendor 10. John A. Walewski, Edward G. Gibson and Vines F.
were sent to ensure proper fit. Prototypes were Ellworth, “Improving International Capital Project Risk
produced and sent to RSSF’s warehouse for thor- Analysis and Management,” Proceedings of Project Manage-
ough evaluation before the vendor was allowed to ment Institute Research Conference, July 2002.
begin production. 11. Thomas A. Carbone and Donald D. Tippett, “Project
These proactive risk mitigation efforts resulted Risk Management Using the Project Risk FMEA,” Engineer-
in a smooth supply chain relationship. Without ing Management Journal, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 28-35.
the FMEA based outsourcing risk assessment 12. Anand Pillay and Jin Wang, “Modified Failure Mode
tool, unforeseen problems might have impacted and Effects Analysis Using Approximate Reasoning,” Reli-
the overall success of the global outsourcing ability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 69-85.
13. D.H. Stamatis, Failure Mode Effect Analysis—FMEA
efforts.
From Theory to Execution, ASQ Quality Press, 1995.
Future of the Analysis Tool 14. G.Q. Huang, J. Shi and K.L. Mak, “Failure Mode Effect
Analysis Over the WWW,” International Journal of Advanced
Decision makers considering outsourcing Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 16, 2000, pp. 603-608.
options should use the FMEA based outsourcing
risk assessment technique. The technique is easily
implemented and understood. CLIFF WELBORN is an assistant
Further research should be undertaken to veri- professor at Middle Tennessee State
fy the risk assessment results with actual short- University in Murfreesboro. He earned
comings and failures of various outsourcing a doctorate in industrial engineering
options. This can be done through a comprehen- from the University of Texas at
sive study of companies undertaking outsourcing Arlington.
programs.
The American Society for Quality can help you take your career and organization to the next level. ASQ can provide you with
quality and performance improvement tools, industry specific knowledge, and best practices to increase efficiency, lower costs,
increase employee and customer satisfaction, and improve processes.
Achieve all of this and more through ASQ’s:
Gain the latest trends in quality at a discounted price when you become an ASQ member. An ASQ membership
can inspire you to make great things happen—in your organization, your school, and in your community.
JOIN ASQ BY CALLING 800-248-1946 OR VISIT www.asq.org AND WE’LL HELP YOU ACHIEVE_GREATNESS.
CASE STUDY
Retrospective
Analysis
Of a Designed
Experiment by Bhupinder Yadav
T
he concept of structured experiments has In one case, however, design of experiments
been successfully applied in many devel- (DoE) techniques were successfully used by India’s
oped countries. But despite its versatility, Department of Defense Production to optimize the
the technique still is not being widely used in process parameters for a plastic injection-molded
developing countries such as India. product used as part of a tank deterrent.
Genichi Taguchi is credited with
advocating the need to design quality
In 50 Words into products and processes from the
Or Less design stage through the entire product
development cycle. Taguchi used statis-
tical methods to integrate the concept of
• India’s Department of Defense Production used design of
DoE, initially proposed by R.A. Fisher,
experiments (DoE) to optimize process parameters for a into industrial processes.
tank deterrent part. The suggested multivariate designs
were more efficient than sequential one-
factor-at-a-time ones. Testing factors
• Retrospective analysis showed that DoE provided an
and levels provided the same estimates
improved process variable setting, but a statistical as one-factor-at-a-time testing did, but
software package determined the optimal solution by the number of experiments rose with
the number of factors and levels.
screening and characterizing the variables. To overcome this challenge, fraction-
al factorial experiments are now gener-
ally employed to reduce the number of
experiments. The effectiveness of the fractional fac- during the expected life of the product. A postpro-
torial designs rests on the empirical premises that: duction annealing operation also did not help much.
• Out of several variables, a few will have sig- To obviate any mixing of recycled material, produc-
nificant effects. tion changed the color of the body of the part. But
• Main effects are generally more dominant the product with the new design still did not meet
than factor interactions. the ESCR test criteria.
• The active interaction takes place among The issue was discussed in detail in meetings
active main factors. with India’s Central Institute of Plastic Engineering
Technology (CIPET) in Chennai. CIPET teams
Problem Statement checked and certified the molds, but the problem
The plastic injection-molded product used for remained. With the help of the production team, I
filling explosive devices was about 47 inches by 4.3 decided to optimize the process parameters and
inches by 2 inches. The part was integrated with their settings to produce an injection-molded body
other subsystems to function as a tank deterrent in casing that would perform optimally.
different environmental conditions. A small plastic molding firm, Miltech Metals in
The expected life of the product was about 10 years in Nagpur, India,1 was supplying the product, but
in the Indian environment. To assess the sustainability its ESCR test results for production runs also
of the hardware component against rigorous weather weren’t satisfactory. The spread value of F-50 var-
conditions, an environmental stress crack resistance ied from two to 12 hours in the batches tested.
(ESCR) test was specified with a 50% failure probabili- The delay in supplying the product was causing
ty (F-50) value of a minimum of 10 hours. concern. The green line in Figure 1 shows a typical
The test performance was indicative of the level pattern.
of molded stresses in the product. Higher levels of
stress resulted in poor performance in the test and Designed Experiment
failure in the field. With the help of Miltech, an army senior quality
Several small manufacturing vendors were mold- assurance team and I decided to optimize the
ing the product. Army personnel in the field were process parameters and their settings to produce
complaining about cracks on the body appearing an injection-molded body that would perform at
top levels. Only limited literature on practical
applications of designed experiments existed dur-
ing this pre-1995 period, and there was no software
to facilitate the task.
FIGURE 1 Probability Graph
In the initial brainstorming session, the managers
100 directly responsible for production were asked to spell
80 out all of the process parameters that affected the
60
40 molding process. They developed a comprehensive
Lot 114A
F-50 = 15 hours
list of 19 parameters for the DoE, shown in Table 1.
20
10 Pre-95 lot Screening and Characterization
8
6
F-50 = 7 hours Of Process Variables
Hours
FIGURE 3 Main Effects Plot (Data Means) for R was not a significant difference between the
two levels.
• Injection time should have been 11 seconds
A B C (level -1), corroborating the earlier setting.
16.5
15.0 • The earlier hold on pressure setting was cor-
13.5 roborated, but there was no significant differ-
-1 1 -1 1 -1 1 ence between the two levels.
The interaction plot (Figure 4) highlights strong
D E F
Mean of R
use in robust design. It improves product quality part, the retrospective analysis was aimed at gain-
while reducing process variability and the costs ing wider understanding and relevancy, rather
of poor quality. The current body of knowledge, than on efficiency in estimating the variables.
supplemented by software capability, provides a
platform for planning experiments, analyzing the AUTHOR’S NOTE
data and drawing conclusions for optimal solu- 1. Miltech Metals was a small company in 1996. After
tions. instituting a quality culture through designed experi-
In this case, which involves a tank deterrent ments, the firm became the Indian army’s largest supplier
BIBLIOGRAPHY
of this plastic injection-molded part. Now a mid-sized
company renamed Miltech Industries, the firm contin- Anderson, Mark J., and Shari L. Kraber, “Keys to Successful
ues to grow. Designed Experiments,” Stat-Ease Inc., paper presented at
ASQ conference, Jan. 20, 1999.
Anderson, Mark J., and Patrick J.
Whitcomb, “Software Sleuth Solves
Engineering Problems,” Machine
Design, June 1997.
Antony, Jiju, V. Somasundarum and
Craig Fergusson, “Applications of
Taguchi Approach to Statistical
Please
comment
If you would like to comment
on this article, please post your
remarks on the Quality Progress
Discussion Board at www.asq.org,
North and South America Australia and Asia Europe and Africa
Call 800-777-3020 or e-mail them to editor@asq.org.
800-777-3020 03-9770-1960 01704-871465
ASQ Weekly
An electronic newsletter and
exclusive benefit for ASQ members
Living Inside
China’s Quality
Revolution
by Jack Pompeo
C
hina. The word alone conjured up images Huawei is located in Shenzhen, in the southern
of distant, mysterious places rooted in portion of the Guangdong Province on the eastern
strange foreign cultures. So when shore of the Pearl River Delta, neighboring Hong
Huawei Technologies, one of China’s largest Kong to the south. I’ve worked here for a year now,
telecommunications manufacturers, with annual and I’ve come to realize I’m at the epicenter of a
sales of more than $10 billion, asked me to relocate nation deeply committed to being the best. Even in
and help direct its quality initiatives, it was too light of recent and highly-publicized recalls, it’s
intriguing an offer to resist. clear to me that China strives for the best educa-
tion, health, living standards and, most important,
the best manufactured consumer products.
Before moving to China, my telecom quality
In 50 Words career spanned two decades, starting at Nortel,
Or Less
today one of North America’s largest telecom sup-
pliers. My most recent years in the United States
• Huawei Technologies, in its quest to be the “Toyota of were spent as quality vice president at Alcatel, now
the telecom industry,” exemplifies China’s recent steps Alcatel-Lucent, one of the largest telecom suppliers
in Europe. My role at Huawei has brought all those
forward in manufacturing quality.
years of quality experience together in a country
that picks and chooses from the best quality initia-
• Huawei and other Chinese companies are using total tives America and Europe have to offer.
quality management, Six Sigma, ASQ certifications One constant in my career has been my involve-
ment in ASQ. Most recently, I served as chair of the
and quality awards to improve the nation’s centuries-
ASQ Dallas section and also a past chair of the
old quality system. Quality Texas Foundation, which administers a
Baldrige based state quality award. I was a past
project director and co-founder of the Quality
When a product was found to be nonconforming, doesn’t exist in India, where the population is
the responsible worker was identified and the root growing faster than China’s.
causes for the failure evaluated. In general, these policies were created to help
Conversely, today’s high-tech Chinese telecom balance growth against the resources needed to
industry has taken more central responsibility, both support a larger population. China’s minister of
for processes and for quality of work. In contrast to commerce, Bo Xilai, recently described how China
the West, while Chinese workers are highly skilled is one big family: “Today my country educates
engineers, many managers believe they lack the more than 100 million middle school students.
critical skills and experience to produce high quali- Each day, more than 20,000 [women] get married,
ty work without close supervision. and more than 40,000 kids are born.”
Quality processes today in China continue to be That’s a major force soon to be reckoned with by
influenced by remnants of ancient policies and prac- the West.
tices established 3,000 years ago. China continues to
exercise strong centralized oversight over end-to- The Toyota of the Telecom Industry
end production processes, extending from the pur- In the same way ancient Chinese carts once pro-
chase of incoming materials and in-process testing vided reliable travel across vast distances, today,
through final acceptances and customer care. Huawei’s products provide reliable telecom ser-
vices to more than 100 countries. But the compa-
World Quality Standards ny’s goal is not to be just another telecom
Three key strategic strengths must be considered manufacturer; it is to be the quality leader in the
when evaluating trends in Chinese quality. First, telecommunications industry.
China’s immense population forms its most basic Huawei’s senior management recently declared
paradox. While one of its greatest strengths, it is the company’s desire to be the “Toyota of the tele-
also China’s gravest frailty. The country’s huge com industry.” To achieve this, Huawei has studied
masses of diligent workers, including a body of Western telecom manufacturing in great detail and
very well-educated engineers, not only represent a has invested heavily in the latest tools and technol-
pool of low-cost laborers, but they are also a chal- ogy. It is constantly looking for better tools and
lenge to maintain in terms of rapidly rising living techniques that will make it a world leader, mov-
standard expectations. ing away from its current emphasis on low-cost
Huawei’s workforce of highly educated and production.
young workers, unencumbered with integrating Huawei’s rapid economic growth parallels the
older legacy systems, has a distinct advantage over company’s desire to be the world leader, and
workers of other developing nations. The average Huawei is now in the midst of understanding the
age of a Huawei employee is 26 years, and nearly critical role quality processes play in its future
half are trained engineers, many with advanced expansion. The company places a strong focus on
science degrees. China’s population is adapting measurements, tools and methods to enforce strict
and learning rapidly and is hungry for best prac- quality control of production processes. Its manage-
tices and new challenges. ment systems are based on ISO 9001 and TL 9000
China’s second strength is its well-documented processes and standards and are applied across all
quality culture of setting production standards, of Huawei’s product lines in design, development,
including laws applicable to the overall design of manufacturing, sales, installation and service.
architecture, specifications, structure, components Huawei also has a complete end-to-end integrated
and type of construction materials. This long quali- product development process that was implement-
ty history, missing in our Western culture, will have ed with the support of IBM in early 1998.
an impact later as processes are further refined.
China’s third strength lies in its strong desire for Thirst for Quality Knowledge
balance, including a holistic view of work, family When Huawei recognized that TL 9000 is the
and a healthy lifestyle. This is evident in China’s industry’s quality standard, it immediately began
one-child policy, designed to balance the needs of searching for someone to help it better understand
the present with those of the future. This strength the standard. Those searches ultimately took Huawei
practices conference. The heart of the TL 9000 commitments and the executive management team
benchmark data storage is housed in a high securi- balanced scorecard. The balanced scorecard mea-
ty area at the University of Texas at Dallas School of sures four key areas in corporation health: financial
Engineering and Computer Science. Every month, and profit, customer and quality, growth and learn-
data from some 1,700 TL 9000 certified sites glob- ing, and internal business performance. The report
ally are sent to the metric repository. cards and quality metrics are linked to both the
The sources of the benchmark data are not identi- executives’ performance reviews and bonuses.
fied, and individual data points are not available.
The only available data are the processed bench- Numbers by the Book
mark data derived from what is submitted, ensur- Virtually every policy and directive in China is
ing participants their information is never revealed. broken down into numbers. With a population of
1.3 billion, the largest in the world, the nation has
an ever increasing impact on world politics, econ-
omies and societies.
You can’t talk about quality You can’t talk about quality trends in China with-
out talking about “the China price,” possibly three of
trends in China without talking the scariest words in U.S. manufacturing. It implies
that you cut your price or lose your customers. Near-
about ‘the China price,’ ly every manufacturer is vulnerable. The result: A
massive shift in economic power could be under
possibly three of the scariest way. Since 1980, the Chinese economy has grown
nearly 10% annually—doubling an astonishing three
words in U.S. manufacturing. times. China has far outperformed Japan’s 1980s and
run circles around Asia’s “Four Dragons”—Hong
Kong, Korea, Taiwan and Singapore—even in their
economic heydays.
This is a critical aspect of QuEST Forum success China has an official policy to grow the economy
because members contribute highly sensitive net- about 8% annually, the rate state officials calculate
work and product performance measurements. would create the 15 million new jobs each year
TL 9000 is part of a major quality trend in today’s needed to absorb new entrants into the labor mar-
Chinese telecom industry. At last count, 17 of the 36 ket and discards from the shrinking state sector.
QuEST Forum service providers were based in Asia Every policy is calibrated to ensure economic out-
and more than half of the TL 9000 certified sites orig- put continues to expand at this rapid pace.
inate in the Asian region. As a single TL 9000 site, Like businesses in the rest of the world, Chinese
Huawei has one of the largest arrays of telecom organizations are driven by numbers. They identify
products registered to TL 9000, reporting data in gaps in their quality management systems and are
more than 20 product categories. closing them quickly. They understand they have a
There are 11 TL 9000 benchmark measurements, short window of opportunity to transform them-
including number of problem reports, problem selves from low cost producers to competitive and
report fix response time, on-time delivery, network high quality global leaders.
element impact outage measurement and field In 2002, Huawei started Six Sigma quality initia-
replacement unit returns. Huawei recently launched tives in its manufacturing center and migrated
an initiative in partnership with the QuEST Forum’s them into R&D product lines. Last year, there were
integrated global quality workgroup. The goal is to eight Six Sigma projects in R&D, and because of
set up a benchmark study team to better understand the success of these pilots, Huawei is planning 20
causes of variability in the TL 9000 benchmark data more. A Six Sigma steering committee oversees the
and raise industry performance. deployment and reviews and approves projects to
TL 9000 benchmark data are a critical component ensure they meet the launch criteria and resources
of Huawei’s quality management system and are are available to support the teams.
integrated into top management’s personal business
REFERENCES
Creating and
Preserving a
Business Culture
by Savio Capelossi Filho
very country in the world has its own are systems and structures in place that dictate
with the changes in the business environment. The author thanks Osmar Caramori and Rosana Grier for
Once the firm’s values have been established, it is assistance in writing this article.
the responsibility of its leadership to disseminate
them throughout the firm—ensuring comprehen- REFERENCES
sion and commitment—and to clarify the desired 1. James C. Collins and Jerry I. Porras, Built to Last—
and expected direction. It is common that the firm’s Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, translated, Editora
objectives, as determined in the workshops, will Rocco Ltd., 1995.
require projects and plans of action for achieve- 2. Ibid.
3. Fundação Nacional da Qualidade, Prêmio Nacional da
ment.
Qualidade—Criteria for Excellence, www.fnq.org.br, 2005.
The deployment of these projects and plans of
4. Prêmio Paulista da Qualidade da Gestão, Regulamento
action is an important mechanism for the dissemi-
750 Pontos, www.ppqg.org.br.
nation of the values established by the leadership. 5. Ibid.
Figure 2 shows the deployment of the mission and 6. Richards, www.richards.com.br.
vision of a firm, starting from the leadership and 7. Fundação Nacional da Qualidade, Prêmio Nacional da
involving all levels of the organization. Qualidade—Criteria for Excellence, see reference 3.
8. Eskelsen Pneus, www.eskelsen.com.br.
Reviewing, Updating 9. Fundação Nacional da Qualidade, Prêmio Nacional da
Organizational Values Qualidade—Criteria for Excellence, see reference 3.
The values established by the leadership are long 10. Incom, Strategic Planning Report, SBC, www.incom.
com.br, 2005.
lasting, perhaps more than five years. Nevertheless,
11. Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary, G&C Merriam Co., 1964.
as external market conditions, technologies, gov-
12. ABC Expurgo, www.abcexpurgo.com.br.
ernment policies and regulations change with time,
13. Prêmio Paulista da Qualidade da Gestão, Regula-
it is necessary for leadership to review the organi- mento 750 Pontos, see reference 4.
zational values periodically. 14. Oxipira Automacão, www.oxipira.com.br.
These reviews might be made in workshops
every two years to discuss, reinforce and update—
when necessary—the firm’s values. This process SAVIO CAPELOSSI FILHO is the direc-
reinforces the firm’s core values, their dissemina- tor of Magna Consultoria, a business
tion and the compromises of the leadership and of management consulting firm based in
the personnel with the firm’s values. São Paulo, Brazil. He earned a degree
Figure 3 shows a process of establishing and in chemical engineering at Faculdade de
reviewing the firm’s values. Engenharia Industrial in São Bernardo
The long-term success and the distinction of a do Campo and specialized in business
small business in the market are influenced by the management. He is a member of ASQ.
alignment and compromise of the personnel with
the directives and objectives its leadership gives.
These directives can be translated as the values of
the firm.
When the small firm grows, these directives—
initially informal and disseminated by direct lead- Please
ership with personnel—tend to lose the power of comment
alignment of the earlier times.
If you would like to comment on this article,
To face this problem, leadership might apply a
please post your remarks on the Quality Progress
method to formulate, disseminate, review and rein-
Discussion Board at www.asq.org, or e-mail
force the firm’s values over time, ensuring their
positive influence and power of mobilization in the them to editor@asq.org.
firm’s day-to-day activities.
examining the quality of its high schools. The results in professional growth for staff,
process, referred to as “high schools of the impacts student achievement and promotes
future,” was to unfold in three phases, which collaboration and reflective practices.
would ultimately lead to implementation during After establishing the guiding principles, the
the 2007-2008 school year. next phase in the high schools’ processes required
During phase one, district high school princi- input from the staff at each of the district high
pals and assistant principals examined research schools. The district high schools vary in size, cul-
and attended conferences on high school reform. ture, demographics and level of academic success,
High school administrators, under the leadership as measured by the Colorado Student Assessment
of the district, collaborated to establish five guid- Program (CSAP) and federal mandates related to
ing principles on which the program would focus. adequate yearly progress.
Therefore, each school structured its own assess-
ment process to determine what level of education-
al quality it had mastered relative to each of the
five guiding principles. To assist in this process,
The structure of the the Thompson district superintendent, Daniel P.
Johnson, established a guide for assessing quality.
assessment tool called He provided in-service programs for district
administrators on the process of sustaining change
for a quality rating of and assessing quality in schools, using materials
from his book Sustaining Change In Schools: How to
each guiding principle. Overcome Differences and Focus on Quality.9
Assessment Tool
One of five high schools in the Thompson
In formulating the five guiding principles, we District—Berthoud—took the lead in assessing
identified 35 elements of success and aligned quality by creating a tool (see Figure 1) to rate its
them with the five principles. With some excep- level of educational quality relative to the five
tions, the basic ingredients of the five guiding guiding principles.
principles and elements of success originated The target stakeholders for the assessment
from key high school reform publications, such as included Berthoud High School teachers, high
Breaking Ranks: Changing an American Institution7 school seniors, members of the school improve-
and Breaking Ranks II: Strategies for Leading High ment team and Berthoud parents. The structure
School Reform.8 of the assessment tool called for a quality rating
The five guiding principles say that Thompson of each guiding principle. The tool also invited
district high schools will: the respondents to recognize which elements of
1. Build partnerships with its communities to success listed with each guiding principle were
prepare all students for success with a variety perceived as Berthoud High School strengths or
of postsecondary and civic responsibilities. areas that needed improvement.
2. Create learning communities that support To assist the stakeholders in assessing the level
and foster meaningful relationships, transi- of quality in each of the five principle areas, a
tions and strong academic performance. rubric was constructed to define what a poor and
3. Collaborate with stakeholders to create a rig- exemplary high school might look like relative to
orous, relevant and articulated curriculum to each of the five guiding principles (see Tables
develop students who are critical thinkers 1-5, pp. 46-48). The respondents were to select
and lifelong learners. what level of quality they perceived for Berthoud
4. Offer rigorous and relevant education by High School on a scale of one to 10—one repre-
offering educational options for all students. senting poor quality and 10 being exemplary.
5. Provide data driven staff development that Each stakeholder group, except for the parents,
Rate Berthoud High School’s level of quality for the following guiding principles as defined in its “high schools of the future process”
(1 = poor; 10 = exemplary). Place an X in the box that represents your estimate of the level of quality.
1. Berthoud High School will build partnerships with our communities to prepare all students for postsecondary success and civic responsibility.
(Elements of success supporting this principle: higher education and business partnerships; school to life opportunities; educational options; and
personal and career academic plans.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Are there elements of success listed under this principle that you consider Berthoud’s strength or elements that need strengthening? Please comment:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Berthoud High School will create learning communities that support and foster meaningful relationships, transitions and strong academic
performance. (Elements of success supporting this principle: support of student academic needs; staff collaboration and coordination; targeted
class size; school climate, culture or caring staff; character education; celebrate diversity; and learning styles.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Are there elements of success listed under this principle that you consider Berthoud’s strength or elements that need strengthening? Please comment:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Berthoud High School will collaborate with stakeholders to create a rigorous, relevant and articulated curriculum to develop students who
are critical thinkers and lifelong learners. (Elements of success supporting this principle: relevancy in curriculum and instruction; integrated
curriculum and instruction; preK-16 continuity in curriculum; critical and creative thinking applications; and fostering of adaptability.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Are there elements of success listed under this principle that you consider Berthoud’s strength or elements that need strengthening? Please comment:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Berthoud High School will offer a rigorous and relevant education by offering educational options for all students. (Elements of success
supporting this principle: learning styles; educational options; supporting student academic needs; and personal career and academic
planning.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Are there elements of success listed under this principle that you consider Berthoud’s strength or elements that need strengthening? Please comment:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. Berthoud High School will provide data driven staff development that results in professional growth for staff, impacts student achievement
and promotes collaboration and reflective practices. (Elements of success that support this principle: critical and creative thinking applications;
fostering of adaptability; professional development plans; use of data analysis; and staff collaboration.)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Are there elements of success listed under this principle that you consider Berthoud’s strength or elements that need strengthening? Please comment:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
was independently organized into groups of five of quality for each of the five principle areas.
to eight individuals. After reviewing the rubric, An important objective of each group was to
each group was asked to discuss the characteris- come to consensus on the rating for each guiding
tics of the rubric as it related to Berthoud High principle. Only high school seniors were selected
School and use the survey tool to assess the level to be in the student stakeholder group because of
Berthoud High School will create learning communities Berthoud High School will collaborate with stakeholders
that support and foster meaningful relationships, transitions to create a rigorous, relevant and articulated curriculum to
and strong academic performance. develop students who are critical thinkers and lifelong
learners.
From the survey, specific areas were identified as feeder middle school in areas of curriculum
areas to strengthen (see Table 6 at www.asq.org/ and transition.
qualityprogress). From these, Berthoud High School 2. Increase interdepartmental collaboration time.
teachers were asked to select five or six areas and 3. Develop more relevant staff training by de-
initiate the planning process to increase quality in partment.
each. 4. Improve the consistency of student expectations.
The five areas on which Berthoud teachers chose 5. Expand college preparation and planning for
to focus their improvement efforts were: students.
1. Continue to strengthen articulation with the Within the last two years, more than half the
TABLE 4 Poor and Exemplary High TABLE 5 Poor and Exemplary High
Schools Contrasted by Schools Contrasted by
Guiding Principle No. 4 Guiding Principle No. 5
Berthoud High School will offer rigorous and relevant edu- Berthoud High School will provide data driven staff
cation by offering educational options for all students. development that results in professional growth for
staff, impacts student achievement and promotes
collaboration and reflective practices.
Poor quality: High quality:
• Test scores show a distinc- • Student and staff diversity is
tive academic gap between seen as a strength and is Poor quality: High quality:
the school’s ethnic and recognized or celebrated at • School staff development • Staff development always
racial groups. all levels of the organization. rarely focuses on student focuses on student learning.
• The school climate fosters • If an academic achievement learning. • Student academic data are
neither academic adaptabili- gap exists, the staff works • Student academic data are constantly assessed to
ty, social adaptability nor sup- to understand the issues rarely analyzed to assist assist teachers in better
port. around the problem and teachers in measuring learn- understanding the learning
• School systems do not sup- establishes a plan to effec- ing; instead only classroom needs of students.
port academic or career plan- tively reduce the gap. management and teaching • School strategic plans are
ning, and rarely attempt to • To assist students who practices are emphasized. crafted to ensure continuous
create appropriate and rele- struggle academically, edu- • There is no plan for continu- improvement of teaching
vant educational options for cational options are provid- ous improvement or school and student learning.
students. ed and include recovery or effectiveness. Rarely are • Criteria for measuring school
• In staff development plans, tutorial programs and com- decisions based on solid effectiveness are in place
there is much emphasis on mon assessment tech- academic research. and frequently reviewed to
managing students rather niques to measure student
• School staff does not believe ensure a quality program.
than exploring research on growth.
that it is the school’s respon- • The school staff strongly
learning styles, best teach- • To best address the various sibility to promote and teach believes that it is the
ing practices and differenti- learning abilities of students, character education, instead responsibility of all adults to
ated instruction. staff development focuses believing this should be mold the character of stu-
• Student success is mea- on individual learning taught at home. dents, and participates in
sured by graduation rate and styles, brain based learning
• “Sit and listen” is the planning and reviewing char-
does not include a focus on and differentiated instruc-
favored teaching technique, acter education programs or
success after high school. tion.
with few opportunities for classes.
• Student success is mea- students to critically think • Classroom instruction is
sured using a variety of cri- about course material and based on meeting the edu-
teria including graduation how it can be integrated into cational needs of students
rates, percentage of stu- previous and future learning. and reflects the learning
dents that attend postsec-
needs of all students.
ondary education programs
and scores on national and • All students are encouraged
state tests, to name just a to be critical thinkers—a
few. trait that is vitally necessary
to function effectively in a
democratic society.
teachers at Berthoud High School were trained in of the plans were to improve quality in each of the
forming and using PLCs to address specific issues. selected areas.
With the quality findings in hand, Berthoud teach- At this point in the quality process, many of the
ers were asked to form individual groups focused PLCs had identified two or three goals including
on developing strategic action plans. The objectives strategies and timelines in their action plans. The
Deployment:
Start Off on
The Right Foot
by
by Robin
Robin Gates
Gates
A
ristotle advised, “Well begun is half
done.”1 A thoughtful plan addressing Business executives and leaders planning or
critical issues makes any project deploy- starting lean Six Sigma deployment projects can
ment easier and produces better results. This benefit greatly from a little preparation and pre-
includes any lean Six Sigma deployment and the work.
Although geared toward large private sector
organizations of 500 or more employees, the
deployment management issues and principles
In 50 Words detailed throughout this article are relevant to pub-
Or Less lic sector organizations and can also apply to small-
er organizations with the appropriate adjustments.
• The decision to deploy lean Six Sigma should
Making the Deployment Decision
not be taken lightly. Difficult questions must
Deployment starts with the decision to do some-
be answered before starting the journey. thing. Deploying lean Six Sigma is difficult and
should not be undertaken casually. Success is more
• Identifying internal customers early on and likely if certain conditions are met. Here are four
questions to ask when deciding whether to deploy
staying connected is critical for success
lean Six Sigma.
during project deployment. 1. Is there a compelling reason for deploying
lean Six Sigma? A simple, compelling and moti-
• Four different deployment models can be used vating reason for deploying lean Six Sigma pro-
vides the driving force for overcoming the initial
when mapping a course of action.
deployment barriers. Many people will need
convincing to get on board. Most will not accept • Revenue generation: increasing sales or output.
that it is the right thing to do on blind faith . Lean Six Sigma goals should guide early deploy-
The reason can be dramatic, such as poor finan- ment decisions. For example, a deployment focused
cial performance or rapidly falling customer solely on saving money looks different from one
satisfaction. It can be that new competitors are that also is expected to improve strategy execution.
threatening your future. A burning platform—a Early agreement between the CEO and executive
crisis that demands action—can be a powerful team on goals simplifies planning and reduces the
motivator, but it is not essential. Many healthy risk of a false start.
companies have successful deployments but com- One energy equipment and services company
monly a threat or opportunity gets their attention focused deployment on improving customer rela-
and pushes them to action. tionships after key customers told the incoming
2. Are there specific goals for lean Six Sigma? A CEO that the company was hard to do business
burning platform or a determined CEO provides the with.
push for lean Six Sigma. But a pull is needed, too. A manufacturer of advanced materials made
Goals are needed to help paint an appealing picture changing the behavior of all employees the prima-
describing how the future organization will be bet- ry objective. It wanted Six Sigma to be the common
ter. The goals should be specific and reflect the busi- business improvement language and the way of
ness case for deployment. life for every employee, not just the Green Belts
Some common goals are: (GBs), Black Belts (BBs) and Champions.
• Business transformation: fundamentally 3. Is there strong executive leadership for lean
changing culture and management. Six Sigma? There is no substitute for leadership. A
• Strategic execution: turning strategy into high level executive (CEO, COO or a key business
results more effectively. unit executive) is needed to maintain the focus on
• Problem solving: adopting a common method deployment, hold executives accountable for get-
organizationwide. ting results from lean Six Sigma and to break down
• Cost savings: reducing costs while meeting organizational barriers. A superstar CEO isn’t nec-
customer requirements. essary, but there should be no doubt about the
sponsoring executive’s
determination to make
lean Six Sigma work.
FIGURE 1 Example of “Critical To” Tree
Anything less greatly
increases deployment
CEO satisfaction with lean risk.
Six Sigma deployment 4. Is lean Six Sigma
right for the problems
that need fixing?
Sometimes organiza-
Quality Delivery Cost
tions start lean Six
(55%) (35%) (10%)
Sigma hoping to solve
all their problems. Lean
Six Sigma is an execu-
$10 million in hard Annual deployment costs tion method not suited
90% of projects directly
financial benefits will must not exceed 10%
improve earnings.
be realized in 2008. of annual project benefits.
to solve problems such
as poor leadership, fail-
ing business strategy or
All employees regularly All managers will be financial restructuring.
exhibit appropriate use of certified Green Belts The process capability
the lean Six Sigma method. or Black Belts by 2008. understanding provided
by lean Six Sigma can
for them. Each of the four generic deployment It can take years to turn a business unit deploy-
models highlights issues that must be considered: ment into an organizationwide effort because the
1. Organizationwide: This is the conventional pilot deployment must prove itself first. For exam-
Big Bang deployment model. It is top-down driven ple, a chemical manufacturer was successful in
with strong central management. All parts of the starting with a business unit deployment. Based on
organization participate. This deployment quickly its success, the manufacturer expanded the deploy-
gets to critical mass and produces results. Cross ment companywide, adding 18 months to the
functional processes can be improved because all deployment.
functions are included. Strong executive leadership 3. Targeted: The targeted model focuses deploy-
helps remove deployment barriers. This deploy- ment on a specific problem or group of problems.
ment approach can transform the business because The approach can involve many parts of the orga-
of its scope and scale. nization or just one.
The disadvantage of this model is that it requires This model can be implemented quickly and
powerful leadership, clear focus and persistence—all yield rapid results. The problem provides the
uncommon characteristics for most organizations. impetus for action and a sharp focus. Little infra-
The model uses many resources and crowds out structure might be required because the scale tends
other initiatives. A strong deployment team is essen- to be small. The change management workload is
tial. It is the most challenging model to execute. greatly reduced.
Research suggests this model has the greatest Resources such as BBs can be centralized and
impact and is most sustainable. Organizations are assigned where needed. Contractors and project
notoriously hard to change. A comprehensive, fast employees can be used more extensively. It can
paced deployment with strong, committed leader- demonstrate quickly that lean Six Sigma works.
ship gets the priority and creates the momentum This approach is unlikely to transform the busi-
essential to overcome the natural inertia of organi- ness because of the narrow focus. Once the immedi-
zations. ate problem is solved, the effort can be disbanded
2. Business unit: This model deploys lean Six easily. Expanding the effort organizationwide is dif-
Sigma in one part or business unit within the larger ficult because the supporting infrastructure has not
organization. It has many characteristics of an been built.
organizationwide deployment, only on a smaller 4. Grass roots: In this approach, a small group
scale. An advantage is a smaller, simpler support- far down in the organization deploys lean Six
ing infrastructure for functions such as training Sigma. This model is easily started, often with an
and project tracking. There is less complexity in a enthusiastic advocate and a specific problem to
business unit. solve. Little infrastructure is needed because of
The smaller scale makes the selling and adoption the small scale. Visible success can create interest
easier. This can be a way to start in highly skeptical in lean Six Sigma elsewhere in the organization.
organizations that need proof it will work. Strong This type of guerilla, “fly under the radar”
business unit leadership is needed, but early CEO deployment has many disadvantages and rarely
leadership is less critical. leads to a broader deployment:
Disadvantages include: • Often missing is top level leadership to make
• Impact on the organizational culture is less- deployment a priority and provide resources.
ened. • Lean Six Sigma knowledge is localized and
• Cross functional improvement opportunities there is often little or no infrastructure to sup-
are often lost as teams find it difficult to reach port expansion.
across functional or business unit lines to • Cross functional work is difficult because of
improve processes. the narrow scope.
• Using BB assignments to develop leaders is • Results are often so small relative to the entire
constrained because exposure is limited to organization that capturing top executive
the business unit and fewer promotional attention is difficult.
opportunities exist.
The author thanks Brian Boyette from Avior Group and ROBIN GATES is a management
Lonnie Basal from Clipper Windpower Inc. for their assis- consultant based in Middleton, WI.
tance during the preparation of this article. He holds a master’s degree in public
policy and administration from the
REFERENCES
LaFollette Institute of the University
1. Aristotle, Politics, translated by Benjamin Jowett,
of Wisconsin-Madison. Gates is a
Batoche Books, 1999, p. 113.
2. Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, translated by George member of ASQ.
Bull, Penguin Books, 1975, p. 51.
3. John P. Kotter, Leading Change, Harvard Business School
Press, 1996.
Please
BIBLIOGRAPHY comment
Eckes, George, Making Six Sigma Last—Managing the Balance If you would like to comment on this article,
Between Cultural and Technical Change, John Wiley & Sons, please post your remarks on the Quality Progress
Inc., 2001. Discussion Board at www.asq.org, or e-mail
Pande, Peter S., Robert P. Neuman and Roland R. Cavanagh,
them to editor@asq.org.
The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola and Other Top
Benchmarking
In Hospitals: More
Than a Scorecard
by Victor E. Sower
I
f you look at many hospitals’ websites and TABLE 1
other resources they make publicly available,
you will often see charts, graphs or tables Item Our hospital National average
showing hospital performance on some metric Overall patient satisfaction 84.9 82.5
compared with a national standard. Check-in 82.0 79.0
An example is Table 1, which was taken from a Nurses 79.3 84.4
hospital website and compares patient satisfac-
Doctors 84.1 85.4
tion in numerous areas with the national average.
Tests 85.5 85.8
The hospital highlighted the areas in which it
exceeded the national average. Family or friends 88.9 85.5
Waiting time 83.6 87.5
MBNMO17
Membership Application
PRIORITY CODE ________________________
❍ Occasionally ASQ shares its mailing list with carefully selected quality-related Electronic Only $55.00 $55.00 $55.00 ❍ $–––––––––
organizations to provide you with information on products and services. Please Air Service Fee n/a $30.00 $35.00 ❍ $–––––––––
check this circle if you do not wish to receive these mailings. Six Sigma Forum Magazine $45.00 $65.00# $70.00 ❍ $–––––––––
Journal of Quality Technology $30.00 $51.00# $49.00 ❍ $–––––––––
Software Quality Professional $45.00 $65.00# $70.00 ❍ $–––––––––
Member Referred By:
Quality Management Journal $50.00 $80.00# $74.00 ❍ $–––––––––
Quality Engineering $34.75 $51.25# $51.25 ❍ $–––––––––
Member Name Member Number Technometrics $30.00 $30.00# $30.00 ❍ $–––––––––
The Journal for Quality and
Participation $45.00 $65.00# $70.00 ❍ $–––––––––
Payment Information
**If you do not choose the airmail option, delivery can take approximately 8-12 weeks.
#GST included
Cardholder’s Name (please print) ASQ You may also join online at
P.O. Box 3066 www.asq.org or by calling ASQ
Milwaukee, WI 53201-3066 Customer Care at 800 -248-1946
Card Number Exp. Date or 414-272-8575.
or fax to 414-272-1734.
New memberships are effective upon receipt of payment. New members receive one year of
Cardholder’s Signature membership from the date they join. Members are billed prior to the anniversary date of their
membership for next year’s dues. Memberships, even those paid by employers, are nontransferable.
All prices are subject to change.
Cardholder’s Address In becoming an ASQ member, you have the duty to follow the ASQ Code of Ethics and Society
governing documents.
CAREER
CORNER
ot long ago, during a discus- the topic of this column, for which I tion and rigorous preparation.
ENGINEERING
Schwan's Global Supply Chain, Inc. is a manufacturing cooperative of The Schwan Food Company’s family of businesses. The group oversees and unifies all aspects of the
company’s production processes – from the procurement of raw materials to the manufacturing of product to delivery at company distribution centers. We currently have the
following opportunity within our facility in Salina, KS:
Qualified candidates please apply to www.schwansjobs.com and reference requisition number 07-20994.
Promoting Diversity, our people and our products. EOE
W
TABLE 1 Sample
was in third grade, her interpretation of data generated by Interlaboratory
teacher, Mrs. M., gave her interlaboratory studies. For these Study Data
an assignment to divide the number studies, Youden recommended that
12: first by six, then by four, then two nearly identical samples be pre-
three, two, one and zero. She came to pared, divided and sent to each of the Laboratory Replicate 1 Replicate 2
me and said, “Daddy, I can do them participating laboratories. The result- A 57.9 70.9
all but the last one. How many times
B 57.3 71.1
will zero go into 12?”
“Hold out your hand,” I said. “Now C 67.9 77.9
I’m going to put nothing in it. Now Youden plots can D 84.0 78.9
I’m going to do it again. How long do
you suppose I can keep doing that?”
make data analysis, E 84.0 55.3
F 58.1 57.6
“Forever!” she exclaimed. interpretation more
“Then that’s how many times zero G 61.9 55.3
will go into 12.” understandable. H 39.2 33.9
Jennifer put “forever” in the blank
I 56.4 58.8
provided on Mrs. M.’s homework
sheet. Two days later, she got her J 45.3 51.6
paper back with that one marked ing data was used to check laboratory K 63.0 62.7
wrong. She bristled. Ever since I’ve alignment. Table 1 shows a sample L 60.9 75.6
known her, she has spoken truth to data set. The tabled numbers are
power. True to form, she accosted scaled from an actual interlaboratory M 35.4 112.7
Mrs. M. after school. Mrs. M. said the study of vitamin A analysis. N 81.7 77.6
answer was zero. Jennifer started to While the study design is simple O 58.9 60.5
explain how it wasn’t: “Here, Mrs. enough, Youden was disappointed
P 51.9 55.8
M.,” she said, “hold out your hand.” with statistical statements based on
Mrs. M. was having none of that.
Jennifer, unwilling to accept a
rebuke, played her trump card. As
Mrs. M. was heading back toward the FIGURE 1 Youden Plot of Sample Interlaboratory Study Data
front of the room, Jennifer said, “The
answer is ‘forever.’ My daddy is a 120
numbers doctor, and he said so!” M
110
Saying It the Right Way
Being right isn’t always enough. 100
Quite often, the way we are right
makes the difference. Evidence to that 90
Replicate 2
multiple. (I used a multiple of 2.45 tial systematic errors incorporated in Metrology,” unpublished manuscript,
times the pooled within-laboratory their techniques.”1 ASQ Statistics Division Fall Technical
standard deviation of 7.48 to arrive at This is better than saying the analy- Conference, October 2000.
a radius of 18.3 following one of his sis of variance followed by the multi-
examples: 2.45 standard deviations ple comparisons test shows that LYNNE B. HARE is direc-
tor of applied statistics at
should contain about 95% of the plot- laboratories D, H and N are in need of
Kraft Foods Research and
ted points assuming no differences further work. The point is that Development in East
among laboratories.) Youden found a way the client would Hanover, NJ. He received
Laboratories D, H and N show rea- understand and would be motivated a doctorate in statistics
sonable agreement between replicates, to action. from Rutgers University,
but also clear departure from the The world will always have its New Brunswick, NJ.
expected value based on the combined share of Mrs. M.’s, but for people will- Hare is a past chairman
findings from all the laboratories, M ing to listen, a simple, graphical of ASQ’s Statistics Division and a fellow of both
excluded. Again, Youden demonstrat- approach that avoids jargon will win ASQ and the American Statistical Assn.
ed excellent statistical bedside manner the day.
by making individual copies of the
plot with the identity of the errant lab- REFERENCE
oratory hidden to all but it. 1. William John Youden, “Graphical Diagnosis Please
“When the points lie closely along of Interlaboratory Test Results,” Industrial Quality
Control, May 1959, Vol. 15, No. 11. Reprinted in
comment
the 45° line, the conclusion may be Precision Measurement and Calibration—Statistical
drawn that many of the laboratories Concepts and Procedures, Special Publication 300, If you would like to comment on this
are following rather carefully their Vol. 1, Feb. 1960. article, please post your remarks on
own versions of the test procedure,” BIBLIOGRAPHY the Quality Progress Discussion
Youden wrote. But when points lie Cornell, J.A., “Youden Address—Remem- Board at www.asq.org, or e-mail
outside the circle, “The laboratories bering Jack Youden,” ASQ Statistics them to editor@asq.org.
responsible for these points almost Division Newsletter, Winter 2007.
certainly have somehow got substan- Vangel, Mark G., “Youden’s Legacy in
Relevance to Smaller
I
t has been 10 years since the ISO example, have penetrated the SME
14001 standard on environmental Organizations market, challenging ISO 14001 as
management systems (EMSs) was ISO 14001 is intended to apply to any the brand of choice.
first published. type of organization anywhere, regard- To address this last issue, work has
ISO 14001 took many years to devel- less of size, or geographical, cultural or begun on a new standard, ISO 14005,
op, but since being issued, it has been social conditions. However, even since Environmental Management System—
widely used in both the public and pri- the 2004 revision, small business repre- Guide for the Phased Implementation of
vate sectors, exceeding the adoption sentatives contend the document still an Environmental Management System
rate of ISO 9001. State and national pro- does not foster acceptance by small and —Including the Use of Environmental
grams have been established to assist, medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Performance Evaluation.
recognize and encourage EMS program Phased implementation has provid-
implementation. The number of ISO ed mixed results to date, with few
14001 certified organizations is now Changes are essential organizations completing the entire
more than 21,000, with almost 9,000 cycle. Also, the committee draft of this
certificates issued in North America for keeping the new document does not address the
alone. SME concerns.
Organizations that have certified to environmental ISO 14001 is strong medicine for a
ISO 14001 attest to multiple benefits: management small business. To make it more palat-
• Enhanced environmental aware- able requires ISO 14000 stakeholders to
ness/accountability at all levels of standard relevant. become better ambassadors to SMEs.
the organization.
• Improved regulatory compliance. Credibility of Certificates
• Enhanced operational controls Key findings from a 2005 global sur- Users of accredited certification are
and procedures. vey of 2,500 SMEs and their represen- increasingly saying that certified orga-
• Reduced environmental footprint tatives include the following: nizations are not delivering expected
in terms of environmental emis- • Few SMEs operate under formal outputs. These users want verification
sions, discharges and waste. systems, and most believe their that an EMS results in improved per-
• Improved internal communica- environmental issues are limited formance, not just conformance to
tions and external partnerships. and of small scale. requirements during a certification
• Continual system improvements • ISO 14001 is regarded as generat- audit. Because there is inconsistency
resulting from EMS objectives, tar- ing more paperwork—and cost— in results, users are questioning the
gets, programs, periodic audits without improving productivity. value of accredited certification.
and management reviews. • ISO 14001 is viewed by SMEs as To address this concern in late 2005,
Myriad supporting standards and synonymous with certification, the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation
guidance documents have been devel- which can cost more to accom- Board (ANAB) began encouraging an
oped in the wake of ISO 14001, plish than an SME nets in a year. increased focus by both accreditation
including those covering auditing, • Many small businesses do not and certification bodies on the out-
performance evaluation, life cycle believe they have the knowledge puts (results) of certified organiza-
assessment, communication, green- or resources to implement an tions during EMS audits.
house gas emissions and product effective EMS unaided. In particular, ANAB called for audi-
labeling. The ISO 14001 framework • Market incentives from either the tors to focus on information regarding
has been the basis for several occupa- public or private sector are insuffi- the trends of environmental perfor-
tional health and safety management cient to attract SMEs. mance, legal compliance, pollution
systems such as OHSAS 18001, • Improved compliance is an impor- prevention and continual system
RC14001 and Z10. tant benefit of ISO 14001 imple- improvement. When the information
ISO 14001 has been revised once in mentation, even though some indicates no improvement or, even
this 10-year period. Change to the national environmental regulatory worse, a negative trend, the audit
core requirements was limited. The agencies have dismissed ISO team should determine what the
focus instead was on increasing com- 14001 implementation as a driver. client is doing to identify why its
patibility with ISO 9001 and clarifying • A single integrated standard management system is failing.
language to ease implementation and would be well received by those in ANAB is not stopping there. It is
enhance environmental protection. the small business market, but looking further at what it can do to
But several criticisms will need to some said this could result in cost- increase stakeholder confidence and
be addressed in the next 10 years to ly reworking of existing systems. maintain the credibility of an ISO
ensure ISO 14001 maintains its rele- • Alternative approaches, a step-by- 14001 certificate. For example, the
vance and continues its growth. step approach to certification for underlying competitiveness of the
?
certification industry can drive audi-
tors to cut audit durations. This can
give one auditor an advantage over
others who conform to the Interna-
Questions About Standards
tional Accreditation Forum guidance.
ANAB also noted that organizations Send your general questions about quality and environmental management
view nonconformances (NCRs) as system standards and their derivatives to standardsquestions@asq.org.
negative and therefore exert pressure
on auditors to minimize the number of Include your daytime phone number and e-mail address. The questions
NCRs issued during an audit. ANAB
is exploring strategies for addressing will be submitted to one of QP’s regular “Standards Outlook” columnists.
these and other weaknesses in the cer-
Look for answers to appear in future issues of QP.
tification process to ensure better and
more consistent audits.
L
ean kaizen and kaikaku (incremen- intervention corrects the situation. technique. Employees were given
tal and breakthrough improve- Producing what was needed—when practical training so that instead of
ments, respectively) have helped it was needed—mandated building deduction, they are able to get to the
Toyota become a global giant, stay quality into the process. Through con- actual root cause.
consistently profitable and increase tinuous lean kaizens, the concepts of Taiichi Ohno, the father of TPS, was
market share year after year. jidoka (autonomation or human based a proponent of the five whys method
The Toyota Production System automation) and quality at the source to root out problems and fix the
(TPS) played a big role, evolving by process for good. Defective processes,
rigorously using practical problem as we know, lead to defective products.
solving and continuous improvement Besides the root cause analysis tool
techniques. Toyota learned early on
Toyota’s emphasis on of five whys, the Ishikawa diagram
that increasing productivity as the problem solving and (the fishbone diagram) was also wide-
only goal does not work. Just-in-time ly used to drill down to the true
(JIT) manufacturing resulted directly incremental and cause. Other simple and beneficial
in less overproduction, inventory and breakthrough techniques used were the process
the other wastes of lean. map, Pareto chart, histograms, run
JIT manufacturing helped Toyota improvements serve chart, scatter diagram, spaghetti dia-
transform from a traditional “push” gram and check sheets, along with
company—based on forecasts and mul- as valuable quality different matrices, charts and graphi-
tiple scheduling—into a customer benchmarks. cal tools.
demand based “pull” system. Lean Spaghetti diagrams were used to
efforts created and further refined use- understand any path taken by an
ful tools such as the andon (visual dis- operator that didn’t result in value, as
play boards or lights), kanban (in- were incorporated. This required well as any other needless product
formation signals to trigger production, using poka yoke techniques wherever and information throughout the com-
replenishment and conveyance), poka possible, and also empowering work- pany. After all, in traditional facility
yoke (error proofing) and heijunka (a ers to be responsible for the quality of settings, the movement of manpower,
method of leveling production batch their own work. tooling, materials and information
size and variety). At Toyota, line workers were often can look like a bowl of spaghetti.
Toyota also focused a laser beam on trained as problem solvers and Benchmarking was used to set
the human side of lean in changing inspectors of their output where need- aggressive goals for kaizen projects.
the internal culture to a team based ed. They were provided the necessary Another technique used in Toyota’s
environment in which people—as if tools and standards. Process controls, lean kaizens was the analysis of internal
by second nature—followed proven such as the use of statistical control versus external time/steps. Internal
standards. Each lean tool and tech- charts, were emphasized. tasks can be done only when a machine
nique became an integral part of daily Various visual controls were generat- is stopped, whereas external steps can
work life. Workers were encouraged ed and implemented with the help of be accomplished in tandem with a
to be thinkers and problem solvers the process owners themselves. machine producing value added work.
instead of mere rote doers. Standard work was the cornerstone for Kaizens were handled using the
The lean kaizen culture requires identifying when things went wrong. plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle. The
employees to use their heads instead Consistency and uniformity of value approach that the kaizen team came up
of just their hands. This emphasis on adding work performed the same way with was the plan step. Implementing
creativity and idea generation eventu- by everyone, across shifts, resulted in the plan was the do step. Monitoring
ally led the company to drastically high quality and predictability. performance versus plan was the
reduce various wastes (muda) and Focused thinking about what went check step. Taking midcourse correc-
total lead times. wrong or how to improve the process tion if the performance does not meet
led to additional kaizen opportunities. the plan, or standardizing at the
Toyota’s Emphasis on Quality Items that were running smoothly and improve level if the targets are met
Simply reducing the quantity or met the standard did not require any was the act step.
batch size to decrease the wastes of further control or extra people to The standardize-do-check-act
excess inventory and overproduc- inspect the product or to maintain the (SDCA) cycle was relevant for prob-
tion—without paying attention to line. lem solving efforts. While monitoring
defects—does not necessarily result in Toyota believed in simple tools and (checking) routine work being done to
the ability to meet customer require- solutions wherever possible. There a set standard, if we found that some-
ments in quality, cost or delivery. If a was a great focus on rapid root cause thing was wrong, we needed to solve
quality problem is detected, the line is analysis and permanent problem solv- the problem and bring the process
immediately stopped and human ing through the use of the five whys back to the standard. Thus PDCA was
used for continuous improvement mental improvements) as well as Quality, cost and delivery are the
efforts, and SDCA was tied closely to kaikaku/kakushin (breakthrough/revo- three most important metrics in a cus-
problem solving activities. lutionary improvements) are neces- tomer’s purchasing decision. On the
Toyota takeaway: Standardize first sary to stay competitive in the global quality metric, Toyota focuses on
by using SDCA. Improve using marketplace. Deeper and wider use of defect prevention rather than detection
PDCA. The A3 reports used exten- TPS or lean results in further cost and after the fact. Autonomation and error
sively at Toyota were visual presenta- cycle time reductions. The aim is to proofing are used throughout the com-
tions of the problem statement, become and remain the benchmark for pany. Workers are empowered and
current state, improved future state, quality, cost and delivery. encouraged to stop the line if there is a
implementation plan and perfor- possibility of a defect. Quality at the
mance against plan displayed right at Toyota Way Today source (self-inspection) rather than
the point of use. And Tomorrow acceptance sampling by the inspection
Toyota wrote down its philosophy in department is the norm. To assist the
Toyota’s Current The Toyota Way to train its overseas empowered operator in making correct
Lean Kaizen Strategy employees. The kaizen method is the decisions, tools such as control charts,
Toyota’s strategy to remain prof- foundation of the way, emphasizing effi- visual controls and work standards are
itable and increase global market ciency, problem solving and continuous provided at the point of use.
share focused on lasting cost reduc- improvement. The final goal of TPS is The extensive use of standard work
tions without compromising quality, neither lean nor kaizen, but to meet busi- is another key at Toyota for training
features, availability or customer sat- ness objectives, such as profits, market new and transferred employees,
isfaction. High quality is the mini- share, customer loyalty and simply working toward and meeting a set
mum requirement just to play in the being the best. TPS also emphasizes the standard, problem solving and contin-
extremely competitive international importance of enriching society through uous improvement (kaizens).
marketplace of the 21st century. the company’s mission and planning Toyota has become a global giant,
As competition has become global, around the long-term view, rather than and by many measurements, the No. 1
the need for the transfer of the lean just next week or next quarter. automotive firm in the world. Indeed,
techniques to the point of production Visual management at Toyota is the continual, rigorous application of
and point of use has also increased. emphasized even more in the lean TPS has enhanced Toyota’s profitabili-
Lean kaizen training and application, kaizen environment of the 21st century. ty, productivity and market share.
along with institutional knowledge For example, problems and defects are
management, has helped Toyota visible to all groups so teams can gather NOTE
maintain continuous learning and and solve issues, rather than hide prob- This article was adapted from a chapter of
Lean Kaizen (George Alukal and Anthony Manos,
innovation within its organization. lems. The shared vision and purpose of ASQ Quality Press, 2006), pp. 21-26.
At Toyota, suppliers have also been all employees helps in promoting team-
brought into the fold. To produce better work rather than creating competitive-
GEORGE ALUKAL is the
goods more cheaply, supplier collabora- ness. Instead of blaming or humiliating
vice president of quality
tion and long-term partnering are individuals, problems are mutually
and process improvement at
essential. Lean logistics and lean supply owned by all, so the best solution can be CMC, a management ser-
chain play an increasingly important found immediately. vice firm based in Chicago.
role. Suppliers are taught lean kaizen Toyota managers practice gemba, He earned an MBA from
techniques through TPS. The value of visiting the manufacturing floor Northwestern University.
shifting the suppliers’ focus from just rather than simply managing or prob- A fellow of ASQ, Alukal
the original equipment manufacturer lem solving from their desks. In turn, was the first chair of ASQ’s Lean Enterprise
(Toyota) to the end consumer (the car a constant drive for improvement is Forum and is a co-instructor of the society’s
buyer) is emphasized. propelled through: lean and kaizen courses. He is certified quality
The future belongs to the nimble • A passion for continuous innova- engineer, auditor and manager, Baldrige exam-
iner and ISO 9000 lead assessor.
firm that anticipates and understands tion.
the wants and needs of the end user • A sense that anything and every-
and incorporates them into its prod- thing can be improved.
ucts. Today, this continuously evolv- • A belief that if you become con-
ing future requires the organized use tent after one achievement, com- Please
of incremental and breakthrough con- petition will surely overtake you comment
tinuous improvement methods next time. If you would like to comment on
through lean kaizens. Toyota takeaway: Alignment of the
this article, please post your remarks
Toyota takeaway: Partner with sup- person’s goals with the company’s
pliers for the long term and help them objectives provides the shared pur- on the Quality Progress Discussion
develop their strengths. More frequent pose. An internal culture nurtures an Board at www.asq.org, or e-mail
JIT deliveries of small quantities are obsession to be the best in quality, reli- them to editor@asq.org.
possible if the supplier is strong, com- ability, cycle time, costs and crafts-
mitted and close by. Kaizens (incre- manship.
Bryan Dodson, ASQ Quality Press, 2006, professionals. It is a good reference ber, $32 list (book).
167 pp., $54 member, $90 list (book and book for all practitioners of statistics. I
CD-ROM). would not, however, recommend it to
educators teaching the Weibull distrib- Leading Peak Performance:
The second edition of The Weibull ution.
Analysis Handbook provides readers Lessons From the Wild Dogs of
Shin Ta Liu
with a quick reference to the Weibull Lynx Systems Africa, Stephen Hacker and Marvin
distribution, its origin, characteristics San Diego Washington, ASQ Quality Press, 2007,
and applications. This book also pro-
vides software in an accompanying CD 128 pp., $18 member, $30 list (book).
ADVERTISERS INDEX
Breaking News on Quality ADVERTISER PAGE PHONE WEB
AIAG 35 248-358-3570 www.aiag.org
Recruitment
Schwan’s Global 62 770-280-4847 www.schwansjobs.com
Supply Chain, Inc.
Available online:
Trafford.com/05-1821
Greenville, SC 29609
864-271-1988 Fax 864-271-1988
ISO9001-TS16949-QS9000-ISO14001
Professional Services Training Services
Internal Auditing Process Audits
Gap Analysis Quality Systems Quality/Lean Speaker
Pre-registration Consulting Services
• Serious and/or Comedic
Root Cause Analysis Process Improvements
Supplier Audits Systems Development
Quality/Lean Speeches
• Dr. Deming Impersonation
Proven track record • Shitsu Kigeki (Quality Comedy)
billhoellrich@aol.com | www.Hoellrich.org (If it’s Japanese, it’s got to be good)
• Entertaining & Challenging
• ASQ Meetings & Conventions Present
Quality Manufacturing
QMA Associates
• Corporate Events
QualityQuest, Inc.
Michael J. Micklewright, CSSBB,CQMgr, CQA, CQE
*Leadership Effectiveness Training
Arlington Heights, Illinois
*Six Sigma/Lean/TQM coaching and training PH: 847-870-0822, Fax: 847-870-0872
*In-house and public Green/Yellow Belt mike@mikemick.com; www.mikemick.com
Training
*Paperless Quality System Software
*Spanish/English Bilingual training Amazon Consulting, INc. Uniquely qualified to assist you
*Assistance with Latin American Manufacturing For all your needs regarding India
www.amazonconsultinginc.com
Call: 1-954-856-8810 or
E-mail: emb109@aol.com
• Setting up Internet Teams TEAM 2000
• ISO 9001:2000 Quality Auditing
Enrique Bekerman, MS, MBA, • Performance Management www.hownwhy.com
ASQ CQMgr, ASQ CSSBB Consulting Phone: 1-877-HOWNWHY
www.webuildqualitytogether.com 208-853-6988 Serving the West Coast Rated in the Top 10% by Customers
Trouble in China?
Give us a call.
Six ASQ certifications at your service.
Shanghai-American Quality Services
Michael Mead, Ph.D., President
Michigan China
269-944-1914 86-769-22425547
Process Characterization
Gauge R&R Studies
Design of Experiments
Statistical Process Control
Minitab 14 Training
TM
Thunder
Scientific
Corporation Lab Code 200582-0
Business Process
Improvement Services
• Business Process Excellence
• Consumer Product Safety
• Development of Quality System
• Factory Evaluation & Inspection
• Supplier Quality Management
• Statistical Process Control
• Testing & Training
709 Lyndsie Dr., Coppell, TX 75019
P: 972-315-2695
mehtaconsulting@gmail.com
www.mehtaconsulting.net
Classified Ads
Quality Assurance Engineer
Design, implement and maintain quality
standards for products and processes. Develop
WORLD CLASS and establish systems to identify and resolve
TRAINING INSTITUTE quality issues. Lead a cross-functional team in
maintaining continuous quality and perfor-
Quality – Six Sigma – Lean mance improvement initiatives. Collate and
Training And Consulting analyze warranty data to determine root cause
• Certification (Green Belt, Black Belt) failure and implement corrective actions.
Design inspection and gauging techniques and
• Customized Training
perform Gage R&R studies. Maintain
• Implementation Procedures
Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)
• Audits data and perform Process Failure Mode Effect
Multilingual Analysis (PFEMA). Requires MBA. Send
English, Spanish, French, Chinese resume to:
Worldwide Offices
Metrology Lab for Sale
Prestolite Electric Inc.
Philadelphia France Philippines Contract Measurement Serv.
Chicago China Indonesia 400 Main St.
Miami India East Africa
Arcade, NY 14009 Mark IV Inc. 19 years in Serv.
Washington West Africa Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 704-660-1577 for details
WWW.WCTI.BIZ
The Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering (EMSE) at the University
877-WCTI-4PA of Missouri-Rolla is seeking candidates with expertise in one or more of the areas of Manufacturing
Engineering, Financial Engineering, Packaging Engineering, and Quality Engineering for tenure-track
faculty positions. The department has a wide range of successful research and instructional programs.
Two Great Improvement The EMSE department has 17 full-time faculty and an enrollment of 140 undergraduates, 40 on-
Seminars in New Mexico campus M.S. students, 200 distance M.S. graduate students, and 20 Ph.D. students.
Presented by Black Belt Jerry W. Wishes, author of: Successful candidates must hold at least one degree in engineering or science and a Ph.D. in an
engineering management related field. Industrial experience is desired but not required. Candidates
• Quality in the Twenty-First Century
must demonstrate the potential for scholarly research and professional development. The applicant
• The Six Sigma Toolbox
must have the ability to initiate research programs and a dedication to undergraduate and graduate
• Seven Sigma— The Pursuit of Perfection
teaching. All faculty are expected to contribute to the distance education effort. The department is
Seminar 1: particularly interested in applicants capable of contributing to the support of the department’s research
54 Improvement Tools and When to Use Them programs in computer integrated manufacturing and flexible manufacturing systems, new product
Seminar 2: development, quality engineering including six sigma, financial forecasting and derivative price
Supplier Partnering Through Quality™ modeling, and packaging. The appointment is anticipated to be at the tenure-track assistant professor
(All SCM professionals should attend this one!) level, however, qualified candidates at all levels will be considered. Specific information about the
position and the search process may be obtained by contacting the chair of the search committee, Dr.
Each seminar is 21/2 days long and will be held
David Enke, at 573-341-4565 or enke@umr.edu. Information about the campus and department can be
at the Hyatt Regency Tamaya Resort & Spa found at http://emgt.umr.edu.
in Santa Ana Pueblo, NM.
Cost is $1200 each
The search and screening committee will review applications and the search will remain open until the
($1000 for early registration; positions are filled. Please submit an application consisting of a current curriculum vitae, a statement
20% additional discount if you sign up for both). of research and teaching interests and goals, teaching evaluations (if available), and complete contact
information for three references to:
Seminars will be held concurrently,
Nov 5-9, 2007. Human Resource Services (hrsinfo@umr.edu) • Reference Number: R00031006
E-mail info@pcshome.biz for all details. University of Missouri-Rolla • 113 University Center East • 1870 Miner Circle • Rolla, MO USA 65409
Visit www.pcshome.biz for more information. UMR is an AA/EEO employer. • Females, minorities, and persons with disabilities are encouraged to apply.
ne of the most important criteria are populated with available and per- plans that the organization is ill
the tool has appeared in a variety of helpful in curbing scope creep in a 1. Charles H. Kepner and Benjamin B. Tregoe,
The Rational Manager: A Systematic Approach to
contexts. For example, quality practi- proposed project. When tackling a Problem Solving and Decision Making, McGraw-
tioners have used the tool for root project, it is as critical to know what Hill Book Co., 1965.
cause analysis, project initiation, strati- will be included as well as what will 2. John D. Arnold, The Complete Problem Solver:
A Total System for Competitive Decision Making,
fication of data, and identification of not be included. John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
causes of a situation or event, just to Early in my career, I used the matrix 3. Tom Kendrick, Results Without Authority:
name a few applications.2, 3, 4, 5 Controlling a Project When the Team Doesn’t Report
in defining the outputs of data pro- To You, AMACOM, 2006.
This simple yet powerful tool enables cessing applications with clients. The 4. Peter R. Scholtes, The Team Handbook: How to
the planner or investigator to more is/is not matrix helped avoid the “but Use Teams to Improve Quality, Joiner Associates,
1988.
clearly define the problem, decision or I thought this program was going to 5. Nancy R. Tague, The Quality Toolbox, second
situation being addressed. The matrix give me …” complaint. edition, ASQ Quality Press, 2005.
structure varies with the intended use. A less common but nonetheless crit-
A typical layout can include the fol- ical application of the is/is not matrix RUSS WESTCOTT is pres-
lowing: what, where, when, how is in the strategic planning process. ident of R.T. Westcott and
much (extent) and who. Column Defining what will be included in the Associates, Old Saybrook,
headings can be: is (what is occur- resulting strategic plans and what will CT. He is an ASQ fellow
ring), is not (what is not or might not not (or will be tabled for another time) and a certified quality
occur) and differentiation (what helps prevent the overzealous nomi- auditor and manager of
appears out of place or odd). The cells nation and adoption of strategies and quality/organizational
excellence.
Example of overview of strategic planning decisions (what will be included and excluded)
Will be Will not be Rationale
What • Incomplete plans from prior period. • Any plan for which a payback period The vision, economic criteria for sustained
• Plans for: exceeds three years. profitability and parameters for growth have been
Business continuance (>4). • Any plan not supporting the vision, carefully established. No more than 10 top level
Process improvements (>3). economic criteria and growth goals. strategic objectives are deemed workable.
Product enhancements (>2).
Product development (1).
Where Strategic planning will commence at an No plans will be formulated without full Sub-SPC meetings might occur as needed,
offsite meeting of the strategic planning knowledge and consent of the SPC. but most of the data collection, analysis
committee (SPC) in June. Monthly and dissemination should occur electronically.
meetings will be scheduled from July
to October.
When First comprehensive strategic plan and Plans that cannot be implemented Avoiding “too much on the plate” is critical.
objectives by end of fiscal year. Plans to feasibly within the three-year period.
be revisited and updated yearly.
Coverage Three-year plan covering plans (see Any action for which a tactical plan cannot Plans might be tabled for consideration in next
above). logically be initiated within the next year. year’s planning sessions.
Who The SPC. People not assigned to the SPC. Specific people might be called on an ad hoc
basis to provide information and expertise.
The ASQ Service Quality Division’s annual conference will bring you the hottest topics in service quality. This is an
exceptional educational opportunity that includes how-to’s, step-by-step advice, success stories, and implementation
guidance on major organizational changes. Session tracks include:
• Internal and External Customer Satisfaction • Service Quality Tools, Techniques, and Methodologies
• Measuring Service Quality Improvement • Developing a Quality Culture
KEYNOTE SPEAKERS
REGISTER TODAY, MENTION PRIORITY CODE JMSQD37, AND SAVE! www.asq.org/sqd1 • 800-248-1946
Desktop Version 8
! DMAIC Shortcuts Now Available
! Measurement systems analysis
! SPC and Process Capability Analysis
! DOE
! Graphical data analysis Enterprise
TM TM
! Data import (Microsoft Excel , Minitab , ! Multi-user, fully Web-enabled analysis
TM
JMP , SAS , etc.) TM
platform with security, centrally
! Concurrent user licensing configured data access, and analysis
and report templates
! Integrates with existing databases to
“unlock” those data for streamlined
analyses
! User interface specific to the user’s role
! Single-click analysis shortcuts
! Auto-updating analyses for monitoring key performance
indicators
2300 E. 14th St. • Tulsa, OK 74104 • USA • (918) 749-1119 • Fax: (918) 749-2217 • info@statsoft.com • www.statsoft.com
Australia: StatSoft Pacific Pty Ltd. France: StatSoft France Italy: StatSoft Italia srl Poland: StatSoft Polska Sp. z o. o. S. Africa: StatSoft S. Africa (Pty) Ltd.
Brazil: StatSoft Brazil Ltda. Germany: StatSoft GmbH Japan: StatSoft Japan Inc. Portugal: StatSoft Iberica Ltda Sweden: StatSoft Scandinavia AB
Bulgaria: StatSoft Bulgaria Ltd. Hungary: StatSoft Hungary Ltd. Korea: StatSoft Korea Russia: StatSoft Russia Taiwan: StatSoft Taiwan
Czech Republic: StatSoft Czech Rep. s.r.o. India: StatSoft India Pvt. Ltd. Netherlands: StatSoft Benelux BV Spain: StatSoft Iberica Ltda UK: StatSoft Ltd.
China: StatSoft China Israel: StatSoft Israel Ltd. Norway: StatSoft Norway AS
StatSoft, STATISTICA, and MultiStream are trademarks of StatSoft, Inc. © Copyright StatSoft, Inc. 1984 - 2007