Basel Norms
Basel Norms
Basel Norms
OBJECTIVE-
The set of agreement by the BCBS(BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING
SUPERVISION), which mainly focuses on risks to banks and the financial
system are called Basel accord. The purpose of the accord is to ensure that
financial institutions have enough capital on account to meet obligations and
absorb unexpected losses. India has accepted Basel accords for the banking
system.
Up till now BASEL ACCORD has given us three BASEL NORMS which are
BASEL 1,2 and 3 but before coming to that we have to understand following
terms-
CAR/CRAR- Capital Adequacy Ratio/ Capital to Risk Weighted Asset
Ratio
BASEL-1
In 1988,The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) introduced
capital measurement system called Basel capital accord,also called as Basel 1. .
It focused almost entirely on credit risk, It defined capital and structure of risk
weights for banks.
The minimum capital requirement was fixed at 8% of risk weighted assets
(RWA).
India adopted Basel 1 guidelines in 1999.
BASEL-2
In 2004, Basel II guidelines were published by BCBS, which
were considered to be the refined and reformed versions of
Basel I accord.
The guidelines were based on three parameters which are as
follows-
Banks should maintain a minimum capital adequacy requirement of 8% of
risk assets.
Banks were needed to develop and use better risk management techniques
in monitoring and managing all the three types of risks that is credit
and increased disclosure requirements.
The three types of risk are- operational risk, market risk, capital risk.
Banks need to mandatory disclose their risk exposure, etc to the central
bank.
Basel II norms in India and overseas are yet to be fully implemented.
The three pillars of BASEL-3 can be understand from the following figure---
BASEL-3
The mission of the BIS is to serve central banks of different of nations in their pursuit of
monetary and financial stability, to foster international cooperation in those areas and to act
as a bank for central banks.The Basel Committee is the primary global standard setter for the
prudential regulation of banks and provides a forum for cooperation on banking supervisory
matters.
Basel I
In 1988,The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) introduced capital
measurement system called Basel capital accord,also called as Basel 1. It focused almost
entirely on credit risk. It defined capital and structure of risk weights for banks. The
minimum capital requirement was fixed at 8% of risk weighted assets (RWA). RWA means
assets with different risk profiles. For example, an asset backed by collateral would carry
lesser risks as compared to personal loans, which have no collateral. India adopted Basel 1
guidelines in 1999.The Basel I Accord, issued in 1988, has succeeded in raising the total level
of equity capital in the system.Like many regulations, it also pushed unintended
consequences; because it does not differentiate risks very well, it perversely encouraged risk
seeking. It also promoted the loan securitization that led to the unwinding in the subprime
market.
Basel II
In June 1999, the Committee issued a proposal for a new capital adequacy framework to
replace the 1988 Accord. This led to the release of the Revised Capital Framework in June
2004. Generally known as‟Basel II”, the revised framework comprised three pillars, namely
minimum capital, supervisor review and market
discipline.
Minimum capital is the technical, quantitative heart of the accord.Banks must hold capital
against 8% of their assets, after adjusting their assets for risk.Supervisor review is the process
whereby national regulators ensure their home country banks are following the rules.
If minimum capital is the rule book, the second pillar is the referee system.Market discipline
is based on enhanced disclosure of risk. This may be an important pillar due to the
complexity of Basel. Under Basel II, banks may use their own internal models (and gain
lower capital requirements) but the price of this is transparency.
Basel III
Even before Lehman Brothers collapsed in September 2008, the need for a fundamental
strengthening of the Basel II framework had become apparent.The banking sector had entered
the financial crisis with too much leverage and inadequate liquidity buffers.Responding to
these risk factors, the Basel Committee issued Principles for sound liquidity risk management
and supervision in the same month that Lehman Brothers failed. In July 2009, the Committee
issued a further package of documents to strengthen the Basel II capital framework, notably
with regard to the treatment of certain complex securitisation positions, off balance sheet
vehicles and trading book exposures. In September 2010, the Group of Governors and Heads
of Supervision announced higher global minimum capital standards for commercial banks.
This followed an agreement reached in July regarding the overall design of the capital and
liquidity reform package, now referred to as“Basel III”.
→ improve the banking sector's ability to absorb shocks arising from financial and
economic stress, whatever the source
→ improve risk management and governance
→ strengthen banks' transparency and disclosures.
Thus we can say that Basel III guidelines are aimed at to improve the ability of banks to
withstand periods of economic and financial stress as the new guidelines are more
stringent than the earlier requirements for capital and liquidity in the banking sector.
The Basel III which is to be implemented by banks in India as per the guidelines issued
by RBI from time to time, will be challenging task not only for the banks but also for
GOI. It is estimated that Indian banks will be required to rais Rs 6,00,000 crores in
external capital in next nine years or so i.e. by 2020 (The estimates vary from
organisation to organisation). Expansion of capital to this extent will affect the returns
on the equity of these banks specially public sector banks. However, only consolation
for Indian banks is the fact that historically they have maintained their core and overall
capital well in excess of the regulatory minimum.
The basic structure of Basel III remains unchanged with three mutually reinforcing
pillars.
Pillar 1 : Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements based on Risk Weighted Assets
(RWAs) : Maintaining capital calculated through credit, market and operational risk
areas.
Pillar 2 : Supervisory Review Process : Regulating tools and frameworks for dealing
with peripheral risks that banks face.
Pillar 3: Market Discipline : Increasing the disclosures that banks must provide to
increase the transparency of banks
What are the Major Changes Proposed in Basel III over earlier Accords i.e. Basel I and
Basel II?
What are the Major Features of Basel III ?
(a) Better Capital Quality : One of the key elements of Basel 3 is the introduction of
much stricter definition of capital. Better quality capital means the higher loss-
absorbing capacity. This in turn will mean that banks will be stronger, allowing them
to better withstand periods of stress.
(b) Capital Conservation Buffer: Another key feature of Basel iii is that now banks
will be required to hold a capital conservation buffer of 2.5%. The aim of asking to
build conservation buffer is to ensure that banks maintain a cushion of capital that can
be used to absorb losses during periods of financial and economic stress.
(c) Countercyclical Buffer: This is also one of the key elements of Basel III. The
countercyclical buffer has been introducted with the objective to increase capital
requirements in good times and decrease the same in bad times. The buffer will slow
banking activity when it overheats and will encourage lending when times are tough i.e.
in bad times. The buffer will range from 0% to 2.5%, consisting of common equity or
other fully loss-absorbing capital.
(d) Minimum Common Equity and Tier 1 Capital Requirements : The minimum
requirement for common equity, the highest form of loss-absorbing capital, has been
raised under Basel III from 2% to 4.5% of total risk-weighted assets. The overall Tier
1 capital requirement, consisting of not only common equity but also other qualifying
financial instruments, will also increase from the current minimum of 4% to 6%.
Although the minimum total capital requirement will remain at the current 8% level,
yet the required total capital will increase to 10.5% when combined with the
conservation buffer.
(e) Leverage Ratio: A review of the financial crisis of 2008 has indicted that the value
of many assets fell quicker than assumed from historical experience. Thus, now Basel
III rules include a leverage ratio to serve as a safety net. A leverage ratio is the relative
amount of capital to total assets (not risk-weighted). This aims to put a cap on swelling
of leverage in the banking sector on a global basis. 3% leverage ratio of Tier 1 will be
tested before a mandatory leverage ratio is introduced in January 2018.
(f) Liquidity Ratios: Under Basel III, a framework for liquidity risk management will
be created. A new Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio
(NSFR) are to be introduced in 2015 and 2018, respectively.
3. Market discipline
Recommendations of Basel–III