Plainsong and Medieval Music

http://journals.cambridge.org/PMM

Additional services for Plainsong and Medieval Music:

Email alerts: Click here

Subscriptions: Click here
Commercial reprints: Click here
Terms of use : Click here

Byzantine castrati

Neil Moran

Plainsong and Medieval Music / Volume 11 / Issue 02 / October 2002, pp 99 - 112

DOI: 10.1017/S0961137102002073, Published online: 09 January 2003

Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0961137102002073

How to cite this article:

Neil Moran (2002). Byzantine castrati. Plainsong and Medieval Music, 11, pp 99-112 doi:10.1017/S0961137102002073

Request Permissions : Click here

Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/PMM, IP address: 142.150.190.39 on 07 May 2014

Plainsong and Medieval Music, 11, 2, 99–112  2002 Cambridge University Press
DOI:10.1017/S0961137102002073 Printed in the United Kingdom

Byzantine castrati
N E I L M O R A N*
The employment of castrati in the Byzantine Church can be traced back to the
A B S T R A C T.
choirmaster Brison in the fourth century. Brison was called upon by John Chrysostom to organize
the antiphonal hymn-singing in the patriarchal church. Since eunuchs were generally considered
to be remnants of a pagan past, castrati are seldom mentioned in early Byzantine sources, but
beginning in the tenth century references to eunuchs or castrati became more and more frequent.
By the twelfth century all the professional singers in the Hagia Sophia were castrati. The repertory
of the castrati is discussed and the question is raised whether the introduction of castrati to the
Sistine Chapel was influenced by the employment of castrati in Italo-Greek cloisters.

The Byzantine state could not have functioned without its eunuchs. They figured
among the most personal councillors and guards of emperors and empresses,
they officiated as patriarchs, metropolitans, bishops and abbots. The intricacies
of the complicated court ceremonial would have been meaningless without their
knowledge; they led armies and determined state policy; they had their own
schools and cloisters. Edward Gibbon’s negative picture of the ‘decadent’ Byzan-
tines can be attributed in large measure to his abhorrence of the physical muti-
lation that made them what they were.1
When Liudprand of Cremona visited Constantinople in the tenth century, the
most valuable of his gifts to Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos (913–59) was
deemed to be four eunuchs.2 They were distinguished as exceptional, because
they had both the penis and testicles removed, a rarity in Byzantium. The Pelo-
ponnesian heiress Danielis included 100 eunuchs among her gifts to Emperor
Basil I (867–87).3 A huge market for eunuchs existed in the capital, with prefer-
ence given to those from Abasgia on the Black Sea coast. Already in the fourth
century the attempt of the emperor Julian (361–63) to purge the court of eunuchs
ended in failure. Theophanes Continuatus complained that so many positions at
court were reserved for eunuchs that they swarmed about the palace like the
flies in a stable during the summer.4 The church fathers condemned them as
remnants of a pagan past.
Thanks to the research of Rudolphe Guilland published in articles since 1943,
negative perceptions of the Byzantine eunuch have gradually begun to change.5
*
m6045758@hotmail.com
1
Edward Gibbon, The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (London, 1776–88).
2
Frederick A. Wright, The Works of Liudprand of Cremona (London, 1930), 209.
3
Steven Runciman, ‘The Widow Danielis’, in Études dediées à la mémoire d’André Andréadès, ed.
Kyriakos Varvaressos (Athens, 1940), 425–31.
4
Theophanes Continuatus, ed. Immanuel Bekker (Bonn, 1838), 318.
5
Rudolphe Guilland, ‘Les Eunuques dan l’Empire Byzantine’, Études Byzantines, 1 (1943), 197–238;
‘Fonction et Dignité des Eunuqes’ (1), Études Byzantines, 2 (1944), 185–225; ‘Fonction et Dignité
des Eunuques’ (2), Études Byzantines, 3 (1945), 179–214; ‘Études de Titulature Byzantine: les Titres
Auliques reservées aux Eunuques’ (1), Revue des Études Byzantines, 13 (1955), 50–84; ‘Études de
100 Neil Moran

More recently, Hiroshi Wada has been investigating parallels between Byzantine
and Chinese court eunuchs.6 Shaun Tougher and Kathryn Ringrose are now
looking at the phenomenon within the perimeters of gender studies.7 Although
the Byzantines doubtless generally harboured a certain antipathy or abhorrence
of eunuchs, their role in the Byzantine state was grudgingly recognized. Given
the tumultuous and often ruthless nature of Byzantine lines of succession, it was
most often the court eunuchs who maintained continuity by manipulating elec-
tions, crowning the victors and burying the vanquished.
In the twelfth century Theophylactus of Ohrid wrote a Defence of Eunuchs
for his brother, a eunuch and cleric of Hagia Sophia.8 Drawing on writings of
the apostles and church Fathers, as well as on Roman law, the author concluded
that castration was not an offence against God. Nor did the physical fact of
castration have an effect on one’s soul: there were eunuchs who had become
saints, patriarchs, bishops and priests. Castration of a child by its parents was
compared to the pruning of a growing vine. Theophylactus thus defended the
practice of affluent families who took this course to ensure that one of their
children could aspire to a career at court.
Surprisingly, at least for anyone familiar with the traditions of Baroque opera,
the eunuchs who sang at court or in the churches of Constantinople have not
been dealt with by Byzantine scholars. A preliminary outline was given in my
book Singers in Late Byzantine and Slavonic Painting,9 and in what follows I will
attempt to throw some light on castrati as part of the Byzantine musical establish-
ment.
The first eunuch who had a formative influence on musical culture in the
capital was Brison, a choirmaster in the service of the empress Eudoxia. Accord-
ing to the fifth-century church historian Socrates, Brison is credited with organiz-

Titulature Byzantine: les Titres Auliques reservées aux Eunuques’ (2), Revue des Études Byzantines,
14 (1956), 122–57. These articles by Guilland are collected in Recherches sur les institutions byzantines
I (Amsterdam, 1967). For a bibliography on eunuchs, see Alexander Kahzdan, ‘Eunuchs’, in Oxford
Dictionary of Byzantium, ed. Alexander Kazhdan (New York, 1991), 2:746–7 and Arnold Hug, ‘Eunu-
chen’, in Pauly Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, Supplementband 3 (Stuttgart,
1918), cols. 449–55. At the last international congress on Byzantine studies at the Sorbonne in Paris
(August, 2001), a session on eunuchs and castrati was organized with the participation of Georges
Sideris, Shaun Tougher, Neil Moran, Horoshi Wada, Nanna Schiødt, Hilkka Seppälä and Karsten
Fledelius.
6
Hiroshi Wada, ‘Zum Eunuchenwesen in Byzanz’, Orient, 30–31 (1995), 335–53. See also his ‘Die
Eunuchen in der byzantinishcen Gesellschaft’, XXe Congrès International des Etudes Byzantines, Pre-
Actes, 3 vols. (Paris, 2001), 3:167.
7
Shaun Tougher, ‘Byzantine Eunuchs: An Overview, with Special References to their Creation and
Origin’, in Women, Men and Eunuchs: Gender in Byzantium, ed. Liz James (London, 1997), 168–84,
and Kathryn M. Ringrose, ‘Passing the Test of Sanctity: Denial of Sexuality and Involuntary
Castration’, in Desire and Denial in Byzantium: Papers of the 31st Spring Symposium of Byzantine
Studies, ed. Liz James (Aldershot, 1999), 123–39. See also Shaun Tougher, ‘Eunuch Saints’, XXe
Congrès International des Etudes Byzantines, Pre-Actes, 3 vols. (Paris, 2001), 3:165.
8
Théophylacte d’Acride, Discours, Traités, Poésies, ed. Paul Gautier (Thessalonike, 1980), 287–331.
9
Neil Moran, Singers in Late Byzantine and Slavonic Painting (Leiden, 1986), 14–50 and my article
‘The Musical ‘Gestaltung’ of the Great Entrance Ceremony in the 12th Century in Accordance
with Rite of Hagia Sophia’, Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik, 28 (1979), 167–93.
 Byzantine castrati 101

ing the nocturnal hymn-singing during the patriarchate of John Chrysostom.10

Arian Christians had been attracting many Orthodox converts by their impressive
chanting of the psalms in antiphony with two choirs of singers. Socrates main-
tained that St Chrysostom called upon the service of Brison to introduce antiph-
ony into the service in Constantinople in order to win back members of his
flock who were consorting with the Arians. During one of the scrimmages with
the Arians, Brison is said to have been struck with a stone. Socrates claims that
antiphonal psalmody was first introduced in the second century by St Ignatius
of Antioch, who was inspired by a vision of angels celebrating the Holy Trinity
in alternating choirs.
Brison’s expertise extended beyond music, in that he was sent in the winter
of 402/3 to John Chrysostom with a request from the empress Eudoxia to return
from his first period of exile. John Chrysostom’s correspondence includes two
letters addressed to Brison from the year 404.11 Brison can therefore be credited
with establishing two foundation stones which were to influence the development
of musical culture in the capital until Constantinople was taken by the Latins
in the thirteenth century: antiphony between two choirs of singers and the use
of castrati at court and in the churches.
In organizing the celebration of the liturgy in his newly erected Hagia Sophia
church in 535, the emperor Justinian specified that the number of singers in the
Great Church was not to exceed twenty-five.12 When Heraclius (610–41) promul-
gated Justianian’s ordinance during his reign, the number of singers remained
fixed at this number, although the number of priests, deacons and readers all
increased. From later documents we know that the choir of Hagia Sophia con-
sisted of a director and two choirs of twelve singers, each with its own master.
The division of the choral resources into two choirs of twelve undoubtedly
existed much earlier and perhaps went back to the models introduced by the
choirmaster Brison in response to the Arians. Church singers themselves were
considered to be members of the lower clergy, but, unlike the higher clergy,
singers and lectors were allowed to marry after ordination.13 Singers underwent
the same ordination as lectors and were tonsured. The so-called Council of
Laodicea specified that the place of the singers in the church was at the ambo,
the central pulpit in the nave; they were not allowed to enter the area of the
sanctuary.
According to ninth-century chronologists, one of the redeeming traits of the
iconoclastic emperor Leo V (813–20) was his love of music. He considered himself

10
Socratis Scholastici ecclesiastica Historia, ed. Robert Hussey (Oxford, 1853), VI, 16, 6 and Historia
Ecclesiastica, in Patrologia Graeca, 67, ed. Jacques-Paul Migne (Paris, 1864), cols. 689 and 1537.
11
Joannis Chrysostomi Opera Omnia, Patrologia Graeca, 52, ed. Jacques–Paul Migne (Paris, 1862), cols.
718 and 739. Cf. Otto Seeck, ‘Brison’, in Pauly Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft,
neue Bearbeitung, ed. G. Wissowa 68 vols. (Stuttgart, 1897), 5:858.
12
Justiniani Imperatoris Novellae ad Religionem Pertinentes, Patrologia Latina 72, ed. Jacques-Paul Migne
(Paris, 1878), cols. 921–6.
13
Franz S. Funk, Didascalia et Constitutiones Apostolorum (Paderborn, 1905), 571 (canon 26). Cf. Moran,
Singers in Late Byzantine and Slavonic Painting, 14.
102 Neil Moran

to have a fine voice and liked to intone the beginnings of the chants for the
choirs. His active cultivation of music in fact eventually led to his downfall.
Immediately after personally directing the chanting of the morning Office before
Christmas in St Stephen’s chapel in 820, Leo V was cruelly murdered by assassins.
The assassins had assumed the costumes of singers and sneaked into the palace
precincts through an outer door opened to admit the singers, who lived in
private dwellings in the city. After this incident singers were required to live
in quarters within the imperial palace.14 This regulation alone would have put
‘bearded’ singers with families at a disadvantage and must have hastened the
universal adoption of castrati, who were forbidden to marry.
The prefect of the palace singers numbered among Leo’s most personal inti-
mates. The famous Skylitzes manuscript Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional de España,
Vitr. 26-2, an illustrated version of the chronicles of the eleventh-century historian
John Skylitzes, depicts him on folio 22. The emperor is shown conspiring against
iconodules with the master of the singers as the patriarch celebrated the liturgy.15
This beardless choirmaster, variously designated as prostasia, arche and ho mikros
protopsaltes in the manuscript tradition, is presumably a castrato.16
After Brison, the first singer to be identified by name is Euthymius Casnes, a
domestikos of the Great Church. His name comes up in connection with the
activities of the unworthy patriarch Theophylactus (933–956), son of the emperor
Romanus I. According to the historian John Skylitzes, Theophylactus was more
famous for his horsemanship than for his piety. To lighten the solemnity of the
service at Hagia Sophia, the patriarch appointed Euthymius Casnes as domestikos,
who reputedly introduced diabolical dances, obscure cryings and tavern songs
into the service.17 To judge from similar accusations in the Defense of Eunuchs,
these were all characteristic features of the performances of eunuchs who
appeared in theatres.
As the castrati were tonsured and lacked facial hair, these traits can be used
as indications for identifying castrati in manuscript illustrations and wall paint-
ings. Possibly the earliest depiction of a castrato appears in the tenth-century
menologion of Basil II (Vatican Library, cod. Gr. 1613) on page 142. Among the
participants in a processional scene for 26 October, there can be seen a beardless,
tonsured cantor in a white robe holding a scroll.18
The best depiction of beardless tonsured singers appears, however, in the codex
Athos, Dionysiou 587m (11 c.).19 Folio 43 contains the Gospel selection for the

14
Georgii Cedreni Compendium Historiarum, Patrologia Graeca 121, ed. Jacques-Paul Migne (Paris, 1894),
col. 949.
15
André Grabar, ‘Les illustrations de la chronique de Jean Skylitzes à la Bibliothèque nationale de
Madrid’, Cahiers archéologiques, 21 (1971), 191–211.
16
For other examples of singers in this manuscript cf. my Singers in Late Byzantine and Slavonic
Painting, 51–8.
17
Hans Thurn, ed., Ioannes Scylitzae Synopsis Historiarum (Berlin, 1973), 243.
18
Moran, Singers, ill. 10.
19
The Treasures of Mount Athos: Illuminated Manuscripts, 2 vols., ed. S. M. Pelekanides et al. (Athens,
1974), 1:179.
 Byzantine castrati 103

Fig. 1 Athos, Cod. Dionysiou 587 m, f. 43 (11th c.): Soloist singing Akathist kontakion
surrounded by choir and readers on the ambo.

Sunday of Orthodoxy, when a special kontakion, known as the Akathist hymn

was performed. The illustration shows a group of nine tonsured members of
the lower clergy who stand on the steps of an ambo. The three to the right
appear to be young deacons, as they wear their narrow band of office, the
orarion, around their necks (see Fig. 1). As I explained in my book on the
depiction of singers in Byzantine and Slavonic painting, the two figures at the
top of the ambo presumably depict the senior lector, who presented the readings
for the Sunday of Orthodoxy, and the castrato, who sang from the roll in his
hands. The clergy on the stairs would have sung the refrain to the kontakion
verses set forth by the soloist.20 The ambo resembles the one in the Hagia Sophia
with stairs to the east and west. The arrangement of the psaltai at the ambo
during the services is also discussed in my book. For regular services the singers
were lined up in two rows between the ambo and the sanctuary (see Fig. 2).
At coronations, platforms were erected for the singers beside the ambo. Accla-
mations to the emperor were accorded a special distinction. The singers, bearing
lights, ascended to the platform encircling the dome, and their chants would
echo through the building.21
20
Moran, Singers, 34–5.
21
Neil Moran, ‘Zwei Herrscherakklamationen in einer griechischen Handschrift aus Süditalien (Codex
gr. 161)’, Die Musikforschung, 30 (1977), 3–13.
104 Neil Moran

Fig. 2 Placement of the choir and clergy along the passageway between the ambo and
sanctuary in the Hagia Sophia. The leaders of the two choirs stood at the openings in
the passageway directly below the ambo with the two choirs lined up in front of them.
(sketch by author).

Beginning in the tenth century references to eunuchs in Byzantine sources

become more frequent, as a more positive attitude was generally adopted towards
them. In his life of the prophet Daniel, Symeon Metaphrastes identified the
prophet as a eunuch and discussed his castration.22 Authors drew parallels
between the corps of eunuchs surrounding the imperial throne and the heavenly
choir of angels, both being outside conventional space and time.23 The eunuch
John Orphanotrophos, brother of the emperor Michael IV Paphlagos (1034–41),
rose from his position as guardian of St Paul’s orphanage to become the dictator
22
Vita S. Prophetae Daniels, Patrologia Graeca 115, ed. Jacques-Paul Migne (Paris, 1899), cols. 371–
403.
23
Kathryn M. Ringrose develops this theme in her forthcoming book Transcendent Lives: Eunuchs and
the Construction of Gender in Byzantium (forthcoming, University of Chicago Press).
 Byzantine castrati 105

of the empire’s civil and military policy.24 Emperor Leo VI fostered this trend
by establishing the monastery of St Lazaros in Constantinople as a haven exclus-
ively for eunuchs.25 Leo VI situated this cloister on an ideal site overlooking the
Marmara Sea between the main palace complex and the Manganes palace. The
looming structure of the Great Church stood only a short distance to the west.
It is reasonable to assume that the monastery shared in the task of training
young castrati singers with St Paul’s orphanage. It remains to be investigated,
whether any of the 106 stichera basilica attributed to Leo the Wise can be linked
to the St Lazaros monastery.26
The typikon and library for the Lazaros monastery appear to have been lost,
but fortunately the founding document (1077) of a monastery for eunuchs in
Constantinople survives in the diataxis for the Panoiktirmon monastery and poor-
house.27 The author of this document, Michael Attaleiates, stipulated that the
monks running his foundation and church be ‘eunuchs and men free from pas-
sion’ (α
παθει̃ς). No bearded monks were to be admitted, except for blood rela-
tives, who were both pious and elderly.With regard to the administration of the
institution Michael Attaleiates wrote: ‘Since I set great value on piety, I decided
to install singers of hymns [υ µνοπόλους] in the divine sanctuary of the All–
Merciful.’28 The founder, a judge of the hippodrome and the vellum, specifically
used the technical term hymnopoloi. These monks were not merely célébrants, as
translated by Paul Gautier. Lampe’s A Patristic Greek Lexikon defines as υ µνοπόλος
‘singing hymns: as subst., singer or composer of hymns’. The editor cites refer-
ences to hymnopoloi as angels in the writings of Gregory of Nazianzus and as
men in Synesius of Cyrene.29 In his biography of Michael Palaeologos, George
Pachymeres says the emperor contributed properties specifically for the adminis-
tration of choir schools (eis tên tôn hymnopolôn oikonomian).30
The seven eunuch monks at the Panoiktirmon monastery under the ecclesiarch
Anthony were instructed to carry out the doxology of day and night Offices
and to observe numerous commemorations of the founder’s family, the emperors
and other donors in the liturgy. At one point in his diataxis the judge Michael
Attaleiates incites the monks to angelic conduct.31 The clearest evidence of the
24
Nicolas Oikonomides, Le lists de préséance byzantines des IXe et Xe siècles (Paris, 1972), 319.
25
Raymond Janin, La géographie ecclésiastique de l’empire byzantin (Paris, 1969), 299.
26
Constantin Floros, Universale Neumenkunde, 3 vols. (Kassel, 1970), 3:82–5.
27
Konstantinos N. Sathas, Mεσαιωνική Bιβλιοθήκη, 7 vols. (Venice, 1872), 1:3–69; Waldemar Nissen,
Die Diataxis des Michael Attaleiates von 1077 (Jena, 1894); Paul Lemerle, ‘La diataxis de Michel
Attaleiate (mars 1077)’, in Cinq études sur le XIe siècle byzantin (Paris, 1977), 67–112. Full translation
in French by Paul Gautier, ‘La Diataxis de Michel Attaliate’, Revue des Études Byzantines, 39 (1981),
5–143. An English translation by Alice-Mary Talbot was published on the internet in the series
Dumbarton Oaks Electronic Texts: Byzantine Monastic Foundation Documents, edited by John Thomas
and Angela Constantinides Hero (Washington, D.C., 2000), 326–76.
28
Paul Gautier, Théophylacte, 37.
29
Geoffrey W. H. Lampe, ed., A Patristic Greek Lexikon (Oxford, 1961), 1431.
30
Georgii Pachymeris De Michaele et Andronico Palaeologis, ed. Immanuel Bekker, 2 vols. (Bonn, 1835)
and Patrologia Graeca 143, ed. Jacques-Paul Migne (Paris, 1891), col. 612; see also Neil Moran,
Singers, 26.
31
Gautier, ibid., 39.
106 Neil Moran

importance of music in the monastic church is given in the inventory of books.

The library contained two kondakaria as well as music for the allelouiaria and
prokeimena, all examples of melismatic chant, which could be executed only by
trained singers.32 One kondakarion is described as: E ′τερον βιβλίον, κονδακάριον,
ψαλτήριον, ε
′χον καὶ τὰ α
λληλουϊάρια προκ[ . . . ].33 The second manuscript with
the text has the variant α
λληλουϊαροπροκείµενα. Prokeimena, however, do not
end with an alleluia. Perhaps this is a reference to the prokeimenon
Aνάστα, ο
Θέος, which is sung during the liturgy on Holy Saturday instead of the allelouia-
rion.34 The second kondakarion contained the Miracle of the Source. In addition
to the usual sticheraria, menaia, heirmologia and psalters, the library included an

Oκτάηχος δικάνονος and a Bιβλίον ε
′χον στιχηράρια τονισµένα (i.e., an oktoechos
with two canons for each mode and a book with notated sticheraria). The musical
repertory of the castrati in the Panoiktirmon church was very rich indeed.
In his Defense of Eunuchs, Theophylactus of Ohrid pointed to an associate of
Michael Attaleiates, Symeon the Sanctified, as a contemporary eunuch worthy
of emulation. The editor of the treatise, Paul Gautier, was able to deduce that
Symeon had been a megistos droungarios in the imperial court. The term ‘Drounga-
rios tes Viglas’ indicated a member of the judiciary, and the prefix megas was
reserved for judges.35 Symeon the Sanctified therefore certainly knew Michael
Attaleiates. After his retirement in 1078, Symeon the Sanctified dedicated his life
to the restoration of the Xenophon monastery on Mount Athos, bringing three
beardless eunuchs with him. The Athonite monks objected, however, to their
presence and had the four of them expelled. Symeon and his followers made
their way to Thessaloniki, where they established a monastery for eunuchs. With
the ascendancy of his former associate, Alexios Komnenos, to the imperial throne
in 1081, Symeon obtained permission to return to the Holy Mountain. The Athon-
ite council of monks stipulated, however, that this was an exception due to the
sanctity of Symeon and their rule against the presence of eunuchs on the penin-
sula remained in place.
The situation on Mount Athos was doubtless one of the reasons Theophylactus
took up his pen on behalf of his brother in the Hagia Sophia. He composed his
treatise in the form of a debate the author supposedly overheard between a
monk and a eunuch in Thessaloniki. Speaking of the castrati who executed the
sacred music, the eunuch challenges the monk who accuses all of the chanters
of being corrupted by the theatre, as if they could not distinguish between
singing before God and before an audience. The defender of the eunuchs asks
32
Paul Gautier, ibid., 97 and 125. Cf. Constantin Floros, Das mittelbyzantinische Kontakienrepertoire –
Untersuchungen und kritische Edition, 3 vols., mss (Hamburg, 1961) and Gisa Hintze, Das byzantinische
Prokeimena-Repertoire, Hamburger Beiträge zur Musikwissenschaft 9 (Hamburg, 1972).
33
Sathas reads the προκ as προκ[οπίου], i.e., of Prokopius, an unlikely solution. Gautier reads the
abbreviation as ‘prokeimena’ or ‘les versets précédés l’allelouı̈a’.
34
Hintze, Prokeimena-Repertoire, 16.
35
Gautier, ibid., 117. See also Alexander Kazhdan, ‘Droungarios tes Viglas’, in Oxford Dictionary of
Byzantium, 1:663.
 Byzantine castrati 107

the monk ‘As if eunuchs filled the churches with trilled airs of licentious chansons
rather than sacred songs – what an accusation!’ The author reveals his erudition
in musical matters by calling upon the examples of the prophet David as well
as Ignatius of Antioch, who introduced antiphony to the Church after hearing
a choir of angels chant in this manner. Did not the austere John Chrysostom,
he says, compose melodies in response to the proselytizing efforts of Arians?
Throughout this section of the treatise, the author takes it as a ‘given’ that the
church singers in his time were castrati.36
Within this environment, the gender of the singers at court and in the Great
Church no longer had to be disguised. Commenting on the canon relating to
the marriage of church singers (psaltai), the twelfth–century historian Theodoros
Balsamon states that this rule had become obsolete, because by his time the ordo
cantorum consisted entirely of eunuchs.37 Eunuchs were forbidden to marry, but
were otherwise subject to few restrictions. The emperor Leo VI even allowed
them to adopt children.38
This impression that eunuchs were finally being accepted is confirmed by two
historical narratives, one from France, the other from Russia. En route to the
Holy Land, King Louis VII reached the famed city of Constantinople in October
of 1147. The chronicler of the Second Crusade, Odo of Deuil, recorded how the
Byzantine emperor Manuel, upon learning that the French were celebrating a
Mass in honour of St Denis sent a group of his clergy to participate in the
commemoration of a saint common to both the Latin and the Greek rites:39
Since the Greeks celebrate this feast, the emperor knew of it, and he sent over to the
king a carefully selected group of his clergy, each of whom he had equipped with a
large taper decorated elaborately with gold and a great variety of colours; and thus he
increased the glory of the ceremony. These clergy certainly differed from ours as to words
and order of service, but they made a favourable impression, because of their sweet
chanting; for the mingling of voices, the heavier with the light, the eunuchs’, namely,
with the manly voices (for many of them were eunuchs), softened the hearts of the Franks.
Also they gave the onlookers pleasure by their graceful bearing and gentle clapping hands
and inflexions of the fingers.

Just before the capture of Constantinople by the Latins, Anthony of Novgorod

wrote in 1200 about how the various parts of the Cherubikon hymn were divided

36
Theophylactus of Ohrid uses the term asmatikos in referring to the singers. To judge by the context
of his treatise, the professional church singers of his time were all castrati. Perhaps the author
considered the expression as a terminus technicus or euphemism for castrato. The expression asmatike
akolouthia refers to the order of service sung in the Great Church. Cf. Christian Hannick, ‘Étude
sur l’α
κολουΘία α
σµατική’ Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik, 19 (1970), 243–60, and M.
Arranz, ‘L’office de l’Asmatikos Hesperinos (‘vêpres chantées’) de l’ancien Euchologe byzantine’,
Orientalia Christiana Periodica, 44 (1978), 391–419.
37
Theodorus Balsamon, Canones Sanctorum Patrum qui in Trullo Imperialis Palatii Constantinopoli con-
venerunt, Patrologia Graeca 137, ed. Jacques-Paul Migne (Paris, 1865), col. 532.
38
Shaun Tougher, The Reign of Leo VI (886–912): Politics and People (Leiden, 1997), 202.
39
Odo of Deuil, De profectione Ludovici VII in orientem, ed. Virginia Berry (New York, 1948), 68.
108 Neil Moran

between castrati, subdeacons and lectors at a service in the Hagia Sophia.40

Anthony of Novgorod described the Transfer of Gifts as follows:41
At the Transfer the castrati chant, however, beforehand the subdeacons [sing] and after-
wards a single monk chants. And at that time many priests and deacons carry in the
Divine Gifts. At that same time there takes place a great weeping and emotion and
humility among all the people, not only in the Hagia Sophia, but also in the galleries.

The conquest of 1204 brought with it the destruction of the fragile choral organiz-
ation of the Hagia Sophia and its attendant churches and monasteries, since the
conquerors introduced the Latin rite to the Great Church. The eunuchs fled into
the countryside or sought employment in Russia, Trepezunt or even in southern
Italy. After the restoration in 1261, the glory of the original typikon of the Great
Church could be restored only with difficulty, since much of the tradition had
been oral. In the capital, Athonite monks who came to positions of influence
had nothing but disdain for eunuchs. The typikon of Athanasios the Athonite for
the Lavra monastery thus proscribed them: ‘I order the superior and the brothers
who have positions of leadership after him never to receive a eunuch in our
Lavra’.42
In the fifteenth century Symeon of Thessaloniki remarked that the old ritual
of the Great Church, the asmatike akolouthia, had fallen out of use after the Latin
conquest and he was able to retain only a few remnants of it in the Hagia
Sophia Church in Thessaloniki.43 Symeon’s instructions served as the basis for
an article by Oliver Strunk on the Byzantine Office at Hagia Sophia,44 and more
recently Alexander Lingas has investigated the preservation of the asmatike akolou-
thia in Late Byzantine manuscripts.45
The disappearance of the valued castrati from the capital and the conversion
of the Great Church to a Latin cathedral meant that its ancient repertory could
be preserved only in Byzantine outposts in Thessaloniki, Epiros, Trapezunt,
Nicaea, on Mont Athos or in Italo-Greek monasteries in southern Italy. Codex
Λ. 3 (15 c.) from the Lavra monastery on Mt. Athos and Codex 8 (14 c.) from

40
This division has been discussed in detail drawing on the melismatic version in the Codex Messina
gr. 161, in my ‘The Musical ‘Gestaltung’ of the Great Entrance Ceremony in the 12th century in
Accordance with Rite of Hagia Sophia’; see also Moran, Singers, 14–50.
41
Khrisanf Loparev, Kniga Palomnik, Publications of the Orthodox Palestine Society 51 (St Petersburg,
1889), 12.
42
Cf. Typikon of Athanasios the Athonite for the Laura monastery, trans. George Dennis in Dumbarton
Oaks Electronic Texts, 245–70, esp. p. 263.
43
Symeonis Thessalonicensis Archiepiscopi Opera Omnia in Patrologia Graeca 155, ed. Jacques-Paul Migne
(Paris, 1866), cols. 536–669.
44
Oliver Strunk, ‘The Byzantine Office at Hagia Sophia’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 9/10 (1956), 175–202.
45
Alexander Lingas, ‘Festal Cathedral Vespers in Late Byzantium’, Orientalia Christiana Periodica, 63
(1997), 421–59. Lingas does not make a single reference to work in this field of research by
Bartolomeo Di Salvo, Constantin Floros, Nanna Schiødt, Gisa Hintze or myself. Symeon of Thessa-
loniki speaks of the many priests and cantors required for the complicated rite of the Great
Church. Lingas, however, is of the opinion that the ‘festal cathedral rite services pale in comparison
with their intricate and lengthy Neo-Sabaϊtic counterpart’ (p. 445) and that Symeon was mistaken.
Does this mean that Symeon of Thessaloniki did not know what he was talking about?
 Byzantine castrati 109

the Cathedral of Kastoria preserve chants of the asmatikon. No complete manu-

scripts with the asmatikon in Early Byzantine notation survive, although Con-
stantin Floros has shown that the notation of the Slavonic kondakaria was clearly
based on them.46
Even if the Latins made short work of the chant books stored under the ambo
when they ransacked the Hagia Sophia in 1204, enough remnants survive that
the Middle Byzantine repertory can be partially reconstructed. Bartolomeo Di
Salvo managed to disentangle much of the confusion surrounding the manuscript
tradition in a series of articles on ‘Gli asmata nella musica bizantina’.47 Di Salvo
divided Byzantine church music into two categories: the repertory of the Hagio-
polites and the repertory of the Asma. The repertory of the Hagiopolites (i.e.,
of the Holy City of Jerusalem) consisted of four genera: (1) the genos ekphonetikon;
(2) the genos sticherarikon; (3) the genos of the asmatikon; and (4) the genos of the
psaltikon.
The genos ekphonetikon was not used for chants, but for the solemn recitation
of Scripture. The genos sticherarikon comprises the melodies in the heirmologion
and sticherarion. The chants in the style of the asmatikon were executed by a
choir and exhibit an essentially melismatic style. The genos of the psaltikon desig-
nated an extremely melismatic solo repertory. Constantin Floros has dedicated
a number of his publications to refining the definition of these genera in greater
detail.48 The chants of the Hagiopolites were sung according to ten different
modes (four authentic, four plagal and two medial).
The repertory of the Asma or genos kalophonikon, in contrast, made use of
sixteen modes (four authentic, four plagal, four medial and four phthorai). Di
Salvo developed a definition of the repertory of the Asma based on the musical
manuscripts, mainly from south Italian sources. Other differences between the
repertories appear in the neumatic notation and in the vocalizations known as
teretismoi. By comparing the instructions for the performance of the Cherubikon
in the typicon of the Great Church49 with the kalophonic version of the same
chant in Messina gr. 161, I concluded that the repertory of the Asma was destined
for the castrati of the Great Church.50 An analysis of the orthros chants in the
repertory of the Asma revealed that the music corresponded to the order of
service used in the Hagia Sophia as well.51
Nanna Schiødt came to a similar conclusion after studying 741 final cadences
46
Constantin Floros, Das mittelbyzantinische Kontakienrepertoire and ‘Die Entzifferung der Kondakarien–
Notation’, Musik des Ostens, 3 (1965), 7–71; 4 (1967), 12–44, esp. 4:41.
47
Bartolomeo Di Salvo, ‘Gli asmata nella musica bizantina’, Bollettino della Badia Greca di Grottaferrata,
12 (1959); 45–50, 127–45; 14 (1960), 145–78. See also the definitions of ‘psaltikon’ and ‘asmatikon’
by Lornezo Tardo in L’Antico Melurgia Bizantina (Grottaferrata, 1938), 37–8.
48
Constantin Floros, ‘Die Entzifferung der Kondakarien-Notation’, Musik des Ostens, 3:20–24 and the
same author’s Universale Neumenkunde, 3 vols. (Kassel, 1970) 1:46–7.
49
Moran, ‘The Musical ‘Gestaltung’ of the Great Entrance Ceremony’.
50
Juan Mateos, Le Typikon de la grande Église (Ms. Sainte-Croix no. 40, Xe s.), Orientalia Christiana
Analecta 165–66 (Rome, 1962–63).
51
Moran, ‘Zwei Herrscherakklamationen’, 3–13, and Moran, The Ordinary Chants of the Byzantine
Mass, 2 vols., Hamburger Beiträge zur Musikwissenschaft 12 (Hamburg, 1975), 39–41.
110 Neil Moran

in the Sticherarion in codex Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, fonds Coislin

42 (13 c.). She hypothesized that cadences in the fourth authentic mode at a
very high-pitched level were sung by castrati. She announced her research results
in a paper delivered at a conference in Moscow in 1989, stating that ‘I have
found reasons to believe that hymns in mode IV were sung by castrati, men
with women’s voices, giving these hymns a special splendour’.52
In my study of the Ordinary chants of the Byzantine Mass, I listed five manu-
scripts that preserve the extremely melismatic repertory of the Asma.53 One is
from Messina (Messina gr. 161), and the other four codices are from Grottaferrata:
Codex Crypt. Γ. γ. IV, Codex Crypt. Γ. γ. VII, Codex Crypt. E.α. X and Codex
Crypt. Γ. β. XXXVII (vi).
The fact that these manuscripts derive from south Italian sources does not
diminish their value as witnesses to the type of solo chants sung by the castrati
in the capital. Constantin Floros wrote with regard to the repertory of the asmati-
kon: ‘As paradoxical as it may sound, palaeographic findings leave no doubt
that in the thirteenth century on Mount Athos, in the cathedrals and monasteries
of Russia, as in the Basilian monasteries of south Italy, from which most of the
relevant Greek manuscripts come, the chants of the Asmatikon were sung to
basically the same melodies’.54 He found furthermore, that the south Italian
sources were truer to the tradition preserved in Slavonic manuscripts than the
surviving Greek sources.
The boot of Italy and eastern Sicily stood under Greek influence as early
as the eighth century BC. After centuries of conflict, Byzantine authority was
re-established in Lower Italy by Basil I (867–86). Starting with the monastery at
Rossano, Neilos of Rossano (910–1004) began his reform of the Italo-Greek clois-
ters. In 1004 he founded the Basilian abbey of Santa Maria di Grottaferrata east
of Rome. When the Normans conquered Lower Italy and Sicily, they attempted
to bolster their authority against the pope by promoting the Italo-Greek cloisters
and by adapting the symbols of the Byzantine empire to their upstart regime.
In discussing the ambitions of the Norman king Roger II, Josef Deér wrote that
‘while the Byzantine provinces were systematically plundered by Norman pirate
ships and Roger’s Grand Admiral let loose flaming arrows even against the
imperial city itself, . . . there grew up at the same time in Palermo, like an
artificial flower, a strictly Byzantine court ceremonial’.55
52
Nanna Schiødt, ‘741 Final Cadences from the 12 months of the Byzantine Sticherarion Coislin 42’,
Papers of Musicological Congress (Moscow Conservatory 27. September–1.October 1989) (Moscow, 1989,
178–87, esp. p. 183. Cf. also her abstract ‘Did Castratos Sing in the Byzantine Church?’ XXe Congrès
International des Etudes Byzantines, Pre-Actes, 3 vols. (Paris, 2001), 3:168.
53
Moran, The Ordinary Chants, 39–41.
54
‘So paradox es auch klingen mag, so läßt doch der paläographische Befund keinen Zweifel darum
zu, daß im 13. Jahrhundert auf dem Athos, in den Kathedralen und Klöstern Rußlands wie in den
Basilianer–Klöstern Süditaliens und Siziliens, aus denen die meisten der betreffenden griechischen
Handscriften stammen, die Gesänge des Asmatikons im Grunde nach den selben Melodien vorge-
tragen worden sind’ (Floros, ‘Die Enzifferung’, 4:41).
55
‘Während byzantinische Provincen von normannischen Piratenflotten systematisch geplündert
wurden und der Großadmiral Rogers sogar die Kaiserstadt mit brennenden Pfeilen beschießen
 Byzantine castrati 111

The Normans set up San Salvatore in Messina as the mother cloister of all
Greek cloisters in the Norman realm. In 1131 Roger granted it freedom from all
obligations to the local bishop. The Italo-Greek cloisters were viewed as essential
parts of the spiritual bulwark against the pope. Pierre Batiffol and Miguel Arranz
have demonstrated that San Salvatore stood directly under the influence of the
Hagia Sophia in questions of liturgical order.56 As I have explained elsewhere,
the texts and music of Byzantine acclamations, the silk weavers stolen from
Corinth, the Byzantine mosaic workers who created their artworks in Palermo,
and the Byzantine court ceremonial all served to bolster the prestige of the
Norman rulers.57 We can well imagine that the castrati would have been treated
as the rarest of Byzantine jewels transferred to a new setting.
The disappearance of the castrati from the capital had wide-reaching conse-
quences for the type of music composed for the church after the Restoration in
1261. In Late Byzantine paintings, the members of the trivium directing the choir
(protopsaltes, domestikos of the choir on the left and domestikos of the choir on the
right) are nearly always bearded. As more and more monks assumed the patriar-
chal mantle, elements of the secular liturgy were replaced by forms derived from
the monastic rites. Under Patriarch Athanasius the clergy of the Hagia Sophia
even went on strike after he decided in 1307 to reduce their salaries and introduce
a more rigid discipline.58 As Strunk demonstrated, Symeon of Thessaloniki
struggled to preserve some of these rites in Thessaloniki. The rich ceremonial
of the imperial court was revived only on the more important feasts as the
emperors sought out the few surviving eunuchs who served as custodians of
the glory of their forebears.
The impoverished Church was less fortunate. The vacuum caused by the loss
of the professional castrati meant that new melodies had to be composed, which
took into account the changed musico–cultural situation. Manuscripts were sud-
denly flooded with the names of composers: Miloš Velimirović compiled a list
of over eighty singers and composers from a single music manuscript of the
fifteenth century.59
Composers such as John Cucuzeles were fully aware of the asmatikon, psaltikon
and of the repertory Asma and they attempted to emulate the older tradition

ließ . . . wuchs in der gleichen Zeit in Palermo wie eine künstliche Blüte ein streng byzantinisches
Hofzeremoniell empor’ (Josef Deér, Der Kaiserornat Friedrichs II (Bern, 1952), 13).
56
Pierre Batiffol, L’Abbaye de Rossano. Contribution à l’histoire de la Vaticane (Paris, 1891), xi and 9,
and Miguel Arranz, Le Typicon du monastère du Saint-Sauveur à Messine (Codex Messinensis gr. 115,
A.D. 1131), Orientalia Christiana Analecta 185 (Rome, 1969).
57
‘Als solches sollte dieses älteste bekannte Beispiel des byzantinischen ‘Staatsmusik’, ähnlich wie die
nach Palermo verschleppten Korinther Seidenweber und Mosaikarbeiter, sowie das byzantinische
Hofzeremoniell dienen als Zeichen der weltlichen Machtansprüche einer aufwieglerischen Königs-
familie . . . , die sich nicht einmal davor scheute, sich mit dem Geschlecht der Komnenen gleichzu-
setzen’; Neil Moran, ‘Zwei Herrscherakklamationen’, 11.
58
James Boojamra, ‘The Ecclasiastical Reforms of Patriarch Athanasius of Constantinople (1289–1293;
1303–1309)’, Ph.D. diss., Fordham University (1976), 152.
59
Miloš Velimirović, ‘Byzantine Composers in ms. Athens 2406’, in Essays presented to Egon Wellesz
(Oxford, 1966), 7–18.
112 Neil Moran

in their kalophonic chants. Therefore, even though the castrati no longer domi-
nated musical culture in the Late Byzantine period, their inheritance was certainly
alive. As for possible links to the castrati in the Sistine Chapel and in Baroque
opera, the question remains open. Was, for instance, the term ‘Spanish falsettist’
for singers in the Sistine Chapel merely a euphemism for eunuchs from southern
Italy, then held by the Spanish house of Aragon, or were the doctors assigned
to the orphanages of Naples directed in their study of the Epitome of Medicine
by Paul of Aegina, with its account of operations of castration, by aural memories
of the castrati in the Italo-Greek cloisters?