OCC - Pub-ch-Asset-mgmt-ops-controls
OCC - Pub-ch-Asset-mgmt-ops-controls
As of January 6, 2012, this guidance applies to federal savings associations in addition to national banks.*
$VVHW0DQDJHPHQW
2SHUDWLRQVDQG&RQWUROV
Comptroller’s Handbook
-DQXDU\ 20
*References in this guidance to national banks or banks
generally should be read to include federal savings associations
(FSA). If statutes, regulations, or other OCC guidance is
referenced herein, please consult those sources to determine
applicability to FSAs. If you have questions about how to apply
this guidance, please contact your OCC supervisory office.
AM
Asset Management
As of January 6, 2012, this guidance applies to federal savings associations in addition to national banks.*
Asset Management
Operations and Controls
U Table of Contents
Asset Management
Operations and Controls
U Overview
This booklet provides guidance applicable to core Asset Management
operations functions and to internal controls and processes used by national
banks to manage risks associated with Asset Management activities. One of a
series of specialized booklets in the Comptroller’s Handbook, this booklet
supplements the overall guidance provided in the “Large Bank Supervision,”
“Community Bank Supervision,“ and “Asset Management” booklets of the
Comptroller’s Handbook. This booklet provides expanded examination
procedures when specific products or risks warrant review beyond the core
assessment. Related booklets in the Comptroller’s Handbook include
“Personal Fiduciary Services,” “Retirement Plan Services,” “Custody
Services,” “Investment Management Services,” “Internal and External Audits,”
and “Internal Control.”
Background
Asset Management operations serves as the “back office” for a bank’s Asset
Management activities and plays an important role in fulfilling a bank’s
strategic goals. Asset Management operations should implement efficient
processes and systems capable of supporting the types of Asset Management
accounts, clients, and assets that the bank services. These processes and
systems should be capable of providing timely and detailed account
information to management, customers, regulatory agencies, and other
authorized parties, such as accountants or co-fiduciaries.
error or theft. The market volatility of assets being processed may increase the
impact of such losses. As a result, a strong system of internal controls is
required. In addition, Asset Management operations often supports systems
and processes integral to overall risk management and compliance processes
for Asset Management services.
Banks may also rely on specialized systems for specific lines of business,
services, asset types, or functions. Examples include retirement plan
participant recordkeeping, document custody, natural resource accounting,
tax preparation, performance measurement, performance attribution, or fund
accounting. Many of these systems have automated data feeds or interfaces
with the core Asset Management accounting system and therefore affect core
functions. While this booklet does not specifically address these specialized
functions and systems, the principles discussed are applicable.
1
If the bank provides Asset Management operations through an affiliated entity for which the OCC is
not the primary functional regulator, the supervisory approach should be discussed with the Asset
Management examiner and bank examiner-in-charge (EIC) before commencing any type of
examination activity for such an entity. The “Large Bank Supervision,” “Asset Management,”
Risk, from the OCC’s supervisory perspective, is the potential that events,
expected or unexpected, may adversely affect a bank’s capital, earnings, or
franchise/enterprise value. Asset Management activities can expose the bank
to direct financial loss when a bank fails to fulfill its fiduciary or contractual
responsibilities. Asset Management activities can also lead to litigation, lost
business, and failed strategic business initiatives. Losses from Asset
Management operations are typically the direct result of error, fraud, or theft.
Most can be attributed to inadequate internal controls, weak risk management
systems, inadequate training, or deficient board and management oversight.
The “Asset Management” booklet of the Comptroller’s Handbook provides
extensive guidance on the risks associated with offering Asset Management
services. The booklet also explains the OCC’s expectations for effective risk
Within the framework of the OCC’s risk assessment system, national bank
Asset Management activities expose a bank to operational, reputation,
strategic, compliance, and credit risk. Effective Asset Management operations
can limit exposure to operational risk and assist in the management and
mitigation of other risks associated with Asset Management activities.
Operational Risk
Losses and litigation from Asset Management operations are typically the
result of
Banks that are subject to the Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA) for
Operational Risk under Basel II must calculate an Operational Risk capital
charge. To determine the required capital charge under the AMA framework,
banks must use internal loss data, external loss data, business environment
and internal-control factors, and scenario analysis. The use of internal loss
data requires the bank to capture and categorize internal operations losses,
including those associated with Asset Management activities. See OCC
Regulation 12 CFR 3, Appendix C “Capital Adequacy Guidelines for Banks.”
Reputation Risk
Strategic Risk
Strategic risk is the current and prospective risk to earnings or capital arising
from adverse business decisions, improper implementation of decisions, or
lack of responsiveness to industry changes. The risk level depends on the
compatibility of an organization’s strategic goals with the business strategies
developed to achieve these goals, the resources deployed toward these goals,
and the effectiveness with which business strategies are implemented. The
resources needed to carry out business strategies are both tangible and
intangible. They include communication channels, operating systems,
delivery networks, and managerial capabilities. An Asset Management
organization’s ability to effectively deploy new products, benefit from
emerging technology, and meet growth and efficiency objectives is
dependent on a well-managed operations group with sufficient, qualified
staffing and other resources to carry out these initiatives.
Compliance Risk
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk arising from an obligor’s failure to meet the terms of any
contract with a bank or otherwise perform as agreed. Credit risk is present in
activities that depend on a counterparty, issuer, or borrower to meet
contractual obligations. Credit risk arises when funds are extended,
committed, invested, or otherwise exposed through actual or implied
contractual agreements, whether reflected on or off the balance sheet. Asset
Management operations activities may expose a bank to counterparty credit
risk. For example, banks may incur credit risk when settling trades on behalf
of clients, advancing payments to client accounts, even on an intra-day basis,
or permitting overdrafts in client accounts. Exposure to credit risk should be
considered when selecting settlement arrangements and evaluating the use of
depositories and third-party custodians. Exposure to counterparties through
Asset Management operations should be considered as part of the bank’s
overall credit risk management program.
A bank’s board of directors must establish the bank’s strategic direction and
risk tolerances. In carrying out these responsibilities, the board should
approve policies that set operational standards and risk limits. Well-designed
monitoring systems allow the board to hold management accountable for
operating within established tolerances. Bank management is responsible for
the implementation, integrity, and maintenance of risk management systems.
Management should establish and maintain effective risk management and
compliance programs that enable the bank to meet statutory and regulatory
requirements. The programs should include effective policy guidance and an
effective system of internal controls in the Asset Management area. The
programs should provide the capability to respond to changes in the bank’s
The board should ensure that its internal audit program provides an objective
and independent review of Asset Management activities, internal controls,
and management information systems. A national bank that exercises
fiduciary powers must, under the direction of its fiduciary audit committee,
arrange for a suitable risk-based audit of its significant fiduciary activities as
described in OCC Regulation 12 CFR 9.9. Further, Asset Management
activities should be considered in determining the scope of independent
testing required by the BSA. For additional discussion of audits and internal
controls see the “Internal Control” and “Internal and External Audit” booklets
in the Comptroller’s Handbook.
Risk Management
Management should develop and implement and the board should approve
well-defined policies commensurate with the nature, size, and complexity of
the bank’s Asset Management activities. Policies should set standards and
may recommend courses of action. These policies should be reflected in
procedures that set forth how daily activities are carried out. They should
include or be supplemented by efficient workflows with appropriate
Compliance Management
Management should develop and implement and the board should approve
policies, procedures, and monitoring systems designed to ensure that a bank’s
Asset Management activities comply with applicable laws and regulations.
(See the Laws and Regulations headings in the Reference section of this
booklet.) All laws and regulations applicable to the Asset Management line of
business should be identified, addressed in policies and procedures, and
communicated to the appropriate personnel. The bank should have systems
to monitor compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including those
listed below. Some of these laws and regulations apply directly to Asset
Management operations. Other laws and regulations may be applicable to
Asset Management account administration or investment management
activities, but the systems to monitor compliance are often administered or
supported by Asset Management operations.
Staffing
performance reporting,
performance attribution analysis,
employee-benefit record keeping,
shareholder servicing,
corporate trust transfer or paying agencies,
document custody,
real estate management,
In many cases, there are automated interfaces or file transfers between these
systems and the core Asset Management accounting system.
the systems and technology support the bank’s strategic goals and
objectives for Asset Management and have the capacity to support current
and anticipated transaction volumes and product complexity.
the information and reports provided by these systems are timely,
accurate, reliable, consistent, complete, and relevant.
bank and customer information are adequately protected from
unauthorized disclosure or alteration and are available when needed.
business resumption and contingency plans are adequate, and data
retention requirements are met.
MIS Reporting
Appropriate MIS reports are an integral part of a bank’s risk management and
compliance programs for Asset Management. These reports should provide
pertinent and timely information in a form that enables the board,
MIS reports should inform management about such essential matters as key
risk indicators, policy exceptions, variances from established guidelines or
thresholds, volume trends and fluctuations, and how effectively internal
controls are working. Asset Management accounting systems typically make
available an array of standard reports, which banks should evaluate and
consider producing at appropriate intervals. Most systems also provide
custom reporting tools or data extracts that enable Asset Management
operations to develop and produce additional reports as needed. Reports can
be developed to flag potential errors or missing information such as pricing
variance or stale pricing reports. To ensure the integrity of these reports,
procedures should be in place to maintain accurate account-, asset-, and
system-level coding. In addition, bank-defined parameters for vendor-
designed, servicer-generated, and internally developed reports should be
tested and validated.
Banks that use affiliated third-party service providers must have processes in
place to ensure that such arrangements also comply with 12 USC 371c,
“Banking Affiliates,” and 12 USC 371c-1 ”Restrictions on transactions with
affiliates” as implemented by 12 CFR 223 (Regulation W) “Transactions
between member banks and their affiliates.” For example, affiliated third-party
service provider arrangements must generally comply with the “market terms”
requirement of Regulation W.
Information Security
security program that suits its particular size and complexity and the nature
and scope of its activities. The guidelines include a requirement that the
board of directors, or appropriate committee of the board, approve the bank’s
information security program and oversee the program’s development,
implementation, and oversight.
For further information, see the “Information Security” booklet of the FFIEC
Information Technology Examination Handbook, OCC Bulletin 2001-8
“Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safeguarding Customer Information,”
OCC Bulletin 2001-35 “Examination Procedures to Evaluate Compliance with
the Guidelines to Safeguard Customer Information,” and OCC Bulletin 2005-
44 “Small Entity Compliance Guide for the Interagency Guidelines for
Establishing Information Security Standards.”
Operational Controls
CFR 9.13(b) require the separation of fiduciary assets from the assets of the
bank.
OCC Regulation 12 CFR 9.13 and 12 USC 92a(c) require that fiduciary
account assets be kept separate from bank assets. To keep fiduciary and other
client assets separate from the assets of the bank while on-premises, they
should be maintained in an in-house vault facility controlled by Asset
Management operations. Book-entry assets and assets maintained off-premises
should not be comingled with bank assets. The records maintained and
receipts issued by depositories, third-party custodians, or book-entry issuers
must clearly indicate that securities are being held for the Asset Management
clients of the bank, or when permissible by applicable law, registered in a
nominee established for this purpose.
Note: The OCC has permitted banks to place their own investment portfolio
assets under the control of a bank’s own Asset Management division by
establishing a formal custodial account for the bank, which is identified
clearly as such on the Asset Management division’s records. These securities
may be placed along with other Asset Management customer securities with
outside depositories or custodians. Under this arrangement, the outside
depositories or custodians should only be permitted to recognize instructions
from duly authorized Asset Management operations personnel under the joint
custody procedures described below.
Segregation of Duties
Management should assess the risks and the control environment within Asset
Management to ensure that appropriate policies, procedures, workflows, and
system access controls establish an adequate segregation of duties.
Segregation of duties can be accomplished through carefully designed
workflows, procedures, and controls. Examples of effective controls include
establishing system user profiles that limit user rights based on job
functions.
establishing multiple online approval levels for specific types of activities.
restricting physical access to securities, checks, and online terminals.
establishing independent written approval requirements for manual
transactions.
Joint custody or control procedures are intended to ensure that one person,
acting alone, does not have the ability to move or transfer funds or assets.
This principle should be reflected in control procedures for physical securities
from the time they are received from the client or client’s agent until their
ultimate authorized distribution. This principle also applies to securities
processing and control functions that can lead to the disbursement of cash, or
transfer of securities to or from a depository, sub-custodian, or book-entry
account.
System Administration
ends or assigned duties change and that user profiles assigned to each user
are periodically reviewed. Refer to the “Information Security” booklet of the
FFIEC Information Technology Examination Handbook for guidance on
establishing and administering user passwords and other authentication
mechanisms.
Individuals designated to input and monitor employee system access are often
referred to as “security administrators.” Because they have the ability to
change system access, security administrators also have the ability to access
and alter records. As a result, procedures should require timely and
independent review of all activity entered by a security administrator (user
setups and terminations, assignment of profiles to users, and specific profile
changes). System logs or audit trails, which record the date and nature of
specific activities taken by system administrators, are an important part of this
process.
Safeguarding of Assets
OCC Regulation 12 CFR 9.13 specifically requires that a bank maintain joint
custody over assets held in a fiduciary account, that such assets be kept
separate from bank assets, and that these assets are properly identified as the
property of a particular account. U.S. Department of the Treasury Regulation
17 CFR 450, “Government Securities Act Regulations: Custodial Holdings of
Government Securities,” sets forth specific requirements for banks that hold
government securities in a custodial capacity. This regulation provides an
exemption from these requirements for national bank custodians if they have
adopted policies and procedures that apply all of the requirements imposed
by the OCC for government securities held in a fiduciary capacity to
government securities held in a custodial capacity.
As a safe and sound practice, all client assets, whether held in a fiduciary or
other capacity, should be maintained under joint custody or control,
segregated from bank assets, and properly reflected on the Asset Management
accounting system as the property of specific accounts. The custody of assets
is addressed in detail in the “Custody Services” booklet of the Comptroller’s
Handbook.
On-Premises Custody
When physical assets are initially received from a customer, they are often, at
least temporarily, safe-kept on-premises in a vault, safe, or similarly secure
facility or cabinet (“vault”). From the time physical assets are received from
the client or agent, they must be properly safeguarded and under the control
of at least two employees. Typically, two front office employees take initial
possession of physical assets, create a written record of the assets being
received, and maintain joint custody until these assets are delivered to Asset
Management operations. Asset Management operations is then responsible for
safeguarding the assets under joint custody until the assets are either re-
registered and filed for safekeeping in an on-premises dual-control vault or
delivered to the appropriate off-premises safekeeping location. The on-
premises dual control vault should provide security devices consistent with
Tangible assets, such as coins, collectables, art, artifacts, and jewelry, should
be placed in appropriate vaults or secured storage areas that ensure the safety
of these assets and maintain their physical condition. Proper security
movement and control records are needed to track movement of these assets
in and out of vaults, including the temporary withdrawal of assets for
appraisal or other authorized purposes.
Off-Premises Custody
2
Financial institutions typically establish one or more nominee partnerships, specifically for the
purpose of registering securities held on behalf of its fiduciary and custody accounts in the name of
the partnership, simplifying trade settlement and other aspects of securities processing. Nominee
partnerships are discussed in detail later in this booklet.
Depositories
Over time, the evolution of the securities infrastructure in the United States
has resulted in two major depositories—the Federal Reserve (for government
securities) and the Depository Trust Company (DTC), a subsidiary of the
Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) (for equities, corporate
and municipal debt, government securities, collateralized mortgage
obligations, exchange-traded funds, and other types of securities.) DTCC also
provides clearing and settlement services through DTC, the National
Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC) and the Fixed Income Clearing
Corporation (FICC).
There are a number of central securities depositories (CSD) outside the United
States as well as international central securities depositories. These play an
increasing role in the securities industry’s migration toward automation,
standardization, and streamlined settlement processes, not only in their
various domestic markets but also with respect to cross-border trades.
Third-Party Custodians
position in the local market, its knowledge, experience, and expertise, and
the likelihood of U.S. jurisdiction over, and the ability to enforce judgments
against, a foreign sub-custodian.
When using a domestic bank as a sub-custodian, the custody and related cash
account at the sub-custodian should be titled in the name of the bank on
behalf of its Asset Management clients so that assets remain segregated from
any bank assets held by the custodian and applicable Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance coverage is passed through to the
beneficial owners of the cash balances. The movement of cash to settle trades
on behalf of clients may result in balances in excess of FDIC coverage,
exposing the bank or its clients to credit risk in the event of the sub-
custodian’s failure. Banks should refer to current FDIC insurance regulations
for further guidance in assessing exposure to uninsured balances. Banks
should monitor sub-custodian credit risk as part of their overall risk
assessment program and should consider settlement arrangements that
minimize this exposure. In the event of fraudulent or otherwise wrongful
activity that results in the loss or misappropriation of assets by a sub-
custodian, and the sub-custodian’s subsequent failure, the bank may be
dependent on the sub-custodian’s private insurance coverage. As a result, an
assessment of the adequacy of the sub-custodian’s internal control
environment, and its fidelity bond, errors and omissions policy, or other
applicable coverage should be part of the ongoing due diligence process.
The agreement, including the specific manner in which the account is titled,
should be reviewed by counsel with securities expertise. When entering into
an arrangement with a broker-dealer as the sub-custodian for fiduciary or
custody assets, a bank should review and consider current Security Investor
Protection Corporation (SIPC) rules and coverage.
Other assets, such as mineral interests, real estate, furniture, and furnishings,
cannot realistically be placed in a vault. A bank should maintain all available
evidence of title or possession of these assets in a reasonable manner and
should take measures to ensure that they are properly insured and physically
protected.
Securities Servicing
Asset Setup
Asset Pricing
Regardless of the asset type, bank policies and procedures should address
valuation sources, methods, and frequency and should ensure that valuations
are accurate and independently verifiable. They should address how pricing
methodologies and frequencies are disclosed to clients on periodic statements
and through other communication channels, such as Internet account access.
These policies and procedures should address valuation practices in periods
of market dislocation, including how significant discrepancies among pricing
sources are addressed and escalated. As asset types increase in complexity,
accurate prices often become more difficult to determine or expensive to
obtain. Establishment of a valuation committee can be an effective way to
oversee the bank’s pricing and asset valuation policies and procedures,
especially for banks that are responsible for pricing illiquid or hard to value
assets.
Income Processing
Income processing for publicly traded stocks and bonds is highly automated.
Most Asset Management accounting systems interface with third-party
servicers that provide automated income announcements and updates for
publicly traded stocks and bonds based on CUSIP numbers. This data, in
conjunction with income codes defined at asset setup, is used to generate
reports of anticipated dividend and interest payments.
Exceptions occur when the anticipated income is not received on time or the
amount received does not match the amount anticipated. Exceptions should
be monitored, researched, and resolved in a timely manner, with escalation
procedures based on the amount and age of exceptions.
For foreign securities, a portion of the income is often withheld for taxes
payable to the issuing country. Various treaties may reduce or eliminate
withholding requirements or may reduce the tax rates for certain types of
securities or accounts. Banks should have procedures to ensure that they
obtain the necessary documents from clients for whom they service foreign
securities in order to establish the account’s eligibility for reduced
withholding or taxation. Asset Management operations should ensure that the
necessary documents and information are provided to the appropriate sub-
custodian. Foreign tax withholding should be monitored, and when
applicable, tax reclamation forms should be submitted and tracked. This
process, typically handled by the local market sub-custodian or global
custodian, can be detailed and time-consuming and is addressed in greater
detail in the “Custody Services” booklet of the Comptroller’s Handbook.
include
name changes.
exchange of securities.
mergers and acquisitions.
tender offers.
offering of subscription rights, warrants, stock options, or stock dividends.
stock splits.
spin-offs and liquidations.
full or partial bond calls.
establishing cut-off times and follow-up steps that give employees time
to act on the corporate action.
when possible, obtaining written responses to requests for direction on
a voluntary corporate action.
if relying on a telephone response, using a recorded line with
authentication controls.
requiring that someone independent of the person who compiled and
prepared the corporate action responses review the compilation for
accuracy before submitting the responses to the issuer, third-party
custodian or depository.
A class action is a form of lawsuit that may be initiated when a large number
of people allege they have been injured by a common act or set of actions. A
common example would be a lawsuit filed by a group of investors in a
particular stock who allege that they have incurred investment losses as a
result of fraudulent earnings reports from the issuing company.
Once a court certifies a class action, meaning that the suit has met certain
legal standards, members of the class must be given notice and the
opportunity to join or to be excluded from the proceeding. Although class
members who exclude themselves from the proceedings do not share in the
resulting settlement, they are also not bound by the judgment in the case and
may pursue independent action.
Because class actions are often subject to a lengthy litigation process, it can
take years from inception to final resolution. Once there is a proposed
settlement, the court typically directs that a settlement notice be sent to
participating class members. Class members must file a settlement claim to
share in the resulting proceeds. While many class action settlements are quite
large, the legal expenses and the number of members in the class may result
in very small payouts to individual class members.
If an Asset Management account owned shares during the time period defined
in the class action notice, it may be eligible to join a certified class action and
to share in a resulting settlement. Both the class action notice and the
governing instrument should be reviewed carefully to determine whether the
bank is eligible and/or obligated to file on behalf of an account, including an
account that has closed. When the bank is not eligible or obligated to file, the
bank may still be obligated to forward the notice to the client, successor
fiduciary, or other authorized party. While the research to determine which
Whether and how a bank responds to a class action notice may have
significant financial consequences to its clients, and therefore represent
litigation and reputation risk to the bank. Class members who do not exclude
themselves from the class by a specified date lose their right to pursue
independent action. Class members who do not file a settlement claim by a
specified date lose their rights to share in the class settlement. Banks should
implement procedures and controls to ensure that class action notifications
are identified, received, analyzed, acted upon, and monitored in accordance
with applicable fiduciary and contractual obligations. These procedures
should include
a process for determining which current and former accounts are eligible
to participate.
a process to determine whether participation in any particular action is
appropriate for discretionary accounts.
a process for determining the bank’s eligibility and obligation to file on
behalf of each account, or its obligation to notify a successor fiduciary,
client, or authorized party.
a process for monitoring key response deadlines for class action notices.
a process for monitoring pending class action settlements to ensure that
funds due as a result of class action judgments are collected and credited
to participating accounts or clients.
criteria for determining whether the bank may be compensated for
processing class action notifications, and for determining the amount of
such compensation.
criteria and process for determining when the prospective proceeds from a
particular class action suit is de minimis in relation to prospective
payments and need not be pursued.
Section 308 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Federal Account for Investor
Restitution provision (commonly referred to as the Fair Funds provision),
allows the SEC to combine civil monetary penalties and other donations to
disgorgement funds for the benefit of investors who suffer losses resulting
from fraud or other securities violations. Such funds are eventually distributed
to investors through the SEC’s Office of Collections and Distributions. Banks
should have procedures in place to ensure that Fair Fund remittances from
the SEC or other regulatory settlements are promptly researched for allocation
and payment to affected accounts.
When a bank has the authority to vote proxies, account and beneficiary
records should be coded so that proxies and related materials are routed to
the appropriate area within Asset Management. Authorized individuals should
vote these proxies in accordance with well defined bank policies and
applicable law. Such policies should provide general guidance for voting
proxies on behalf of fiduciary accounts, and establish a process for voting
non-routine proxies. Typically, either the investment committee or a specially
designated proxy committee is responsible for determining how to vote on
non-routine proxies. Refer to the “Retirement Services” booklet of the
Comptroller’s Handbook and to Department of Labor Interpretive Bulletin
2509.94-2, “Written Statements of Investment Policy, Including Proxy Voting
Policy” for specific guidance applicable to ERISA accounts.
When a national bank holds own-bank stock as sole trustee, the bank is
prohibited under 12 USC 61 from voting these shares in the election of
directors. Co-trustees, and, to the extent to which it is specified in the
governing instrument, the account’s grantor or beneficiaries may be
empowered to vote these shares. Most asset management accounting systems
enable banks to establish one or more specific beneficial owners at the
specific asset level, enabling banks that would otherwise have proxy voting
authority to automate the distribution of own-bank stock proxy materials to
appropriate parties. For further guidance, refer to the “Conflicts of Interest”
booklet in the Comptroller’s Handbook.
The sheer volume of securities trading and settlement activities and related
costs and risks have led the industry to undertake a number of initiatives
achieve cost efficiencies and mitigate risk. These include book-entry
securities, net settlement of trades, shortened settlement times, central
counter-parties, and increased automation of post-trade pre-settlement
processes. Key participants in the securities processing infrastructure include
securities exchanges (trade execution), DTCC (post-trade communication and
confirmation, clearance and settlement, custody, and asset servicing) and
large financial institutions acting as intermediaries for institutional clients and
other financial institutions. The industry continues to evolve due to the
Depository Interfaces
“Free delivery” occurs when assets are removed from an account without the
receipt of cash. A free delivery might occur under the following
circumstances: account closing (including transfers to successor fiduciaries);
gifts from the account; customer requests for the return of assets; the transfer
of the asset to a party specified in a trust agreement; or the transfer of assets
from one account to another. Free-delivery transactions require particular
vigilance and proper safeguards to ensure that an unauthorized asset delivery
does not occur, as the potential loss could be substantial. Free deliveries
should be subject to joint custody or control requirements. No person should
be able to release securities from a depository without an independent check
on the validity of the transaction.
The front office is responsible for initiating free deliveries and ensuring that all
free deliveries are authorized by the proper parties in accordance with the
governing document and bank policy. The authorization of two designated
front office employees (typically including either the relationship manager or
administrative officer) should be provided to Asset Management operations
along with detailed instructions for the delivery of the asset(s).
When applicable, banks need to provide transfer statements that meet the
requirements of IRS regulation 26 CFR 1.6045A-1, “Statements of information
required in connection with transfers of securities.” These requirements
include providing adjusted cost basis information for “covered securities” as
defined in the regulation.
3
In a broker to broker transfer, the authorizing documents are typically retained by the broker
requesting the transfer.
A “free receipt,” also referred to as a “receipt in-kind,” occurs when assets are
received and no payment is exchanged in return. A free receipt may occur
when assets are received from the client or their agent to fund a new account;
the client or agent adds assets to an existing account; or the account is the
recipient of a gift or in-kind distribution. Free receipts may be accomplished
by either the physical delivery of securities to the bank or a book-entry
transfer.
SEC Rule 17 CFR 240.17f-1, “Requirements for reporting and inquiry with
respect to missing, lost, counterfeit or stolen securities,” requires banks,
brokers, and other institutions that deal with or process securities to report
lost, stolen, or counterfeit securities to a central information facility, the
Securities Information Center (SIC). As a result, banks that handle securities
must register, either directly or indirectly through another institution, with the
SIC. A bank must also inquire with the SIC regarding any physical security
that comes into its possession and is part of a transaction of $10,000 or more
to determine whether the security has been reported lost or stolen, subject to
a number of exceptions (such as securities received from another reporting
institution). Asset Management operations needs to be familiar with the
requirements of and exceptions to Rule 17 CFR 240.17f-1 and must report
lost or stolen securities and make inquiries regarding incoming securities in
compliance with this rule.
While the global investment needs of many clients can be met with American
Depository Receipts (ADR) or international mutual funds, large customers,
particularly institutional investors, may wish to invest directly in foreign
securities. Investment in foreign securities provides additional challenges for
trade settlement, securities servicing (especially corporate action processing),
and may require additional Asset Management accounting system capabilities
to handle multiple currencies. In addition, a portion of the income from
foreign securities may need to be withheld for taxes payable to the issuing
country.
Disbursements—Money Movement
Checks
At the time a check is issued, funds are typically transferred from the demand
deposit account or GL account for uninvested Asset Management cash to a
separate demand deposit account or GL account designated for checks issued
but not yet presented for payment. For guidance on the reconciliation of this
account, refer to the reconciliation section under Internal Accounting
Controls in this booklet. Policies and procedures should address requests for
stop payments on these checks, which, because they are considered “official
checks,” are subject to special rules in accordance with applicable state law.
Wire Transfers
ACH
Internal Transfers
check or other internal banking entry. The approval and processing functions
for internal transfers should be properly segregated.
Cash Receipts
Note: Banks should have procedures for the rare occasions when currency is
received for accounts, typically in the course of estate administration. These
procedures should be designed to establish and maintain joint control and to
ensure that cash is deposited to the Asset Management cash demand deposit
account or GL account through a bank teller and therefore subject to the
bank’s currency transaction reporting policies and procedures.
Fee Processing
Fees are typically computed and posted periodically, usually monthly. When
fees are charged directly to a client account, cash is moved automatically
from the client account to a designated fee suspense account within the Asset
Management accounting system. These funds are then transferred to the
appropriate GL account. Because the IRS requires banks to recognize Asset
Management income on an accrual basis, the GL account credited may be
either a fee income or, as is typical for fees collected less frequently than
monthly, a fee accrual account.
fee suspense accounts, fee accrual accounts, and fee receivable accounts
are reconciled periodically by individuals other than those responsible for
authorizing or posting fee transactions.
MIS reports should identify accounts with missing or incorrect fee schedules;
fee exceptions, such as discounts or negotiated fees; past-due fees; out-of-
balance suspense or accrual accounts; fee-collection trends, and unusual
fluctuations in fees at the account and department levels.
Many of these systems include interfaces with, or file transfers to and from,
other systems, such as
A bank should select its Asset Management accounting system after a careful
assessment of the system’s capabilities in light of the bank’s current and
anticipated Asset Management business requirements, the security and
integrity of the system, the ability to appropriately integrate with other bank
systems and conform to bank technical standards, the reputation and financial
viability of the system provider, and the cost of the system. An ongoing
assessment should be performed to identify deficiencies that arise either
through changes in the bank’s requirements, environment, or the emergence
or discovery of previously unidentified weaknesses. Management should
ensure that appropriate mitigating controls are implemented to overcome
identified weaknesses. At times, management may engage qualified third
parties to review systems and applications for weaknesses or rely on the work
of qualified third parties engaged by others. Likewise, management may
engage or otherwise rely on qualified third parties to assess the control
environment of system service providers and should implement controls to
mitigate identified weaknesses.
Banks that are using or considering the use of automated systems to assist in
the performance of annual investment reviews for fiduciary accounts should
refer to OCC Bulletin 2008-10 “Annual Reviews of Fiduciary Accounts
Pursuant to 12 CFR 9.6(c)” for guidance.
Input Controls
Internal accounting controls are used to verify that entries posted to the Asset
Management accounting system that affect cash balances or asset positions
are balanced and controlled and that non-monetary input (input affecting an
account or an asset’s master file) is authorized and accurate. For systems that
use batch processing, three common types of accounting controls are batch
controls, blotter controls, and system balancing.
In addition to ensuring that monetary entries (those affecting cash and asset
balances) are properly controlled, appropriate risk-based controls are needed
for non-monetary input. Workflows vary in terms of whether such input is
performed centrally or locally or performed in the front office, middle office,
or back office. Management should implement risk-based procedures to
ensure that, when warranted from a quality-assurance or an internal-control
perspective, either an independent person performs a comparison of source
documents to system changes or that compensating controls are in place.
Examples of particularly sensitive non-monetary input types include asset
location code changes and name and address changes. The ability to
Reconcilements
Cash Reconcilement
Uninvested cash balances are reflected in detail in each client account (sub-
ledger) on the Asset Management accounting system, as aggregate totals on
the Asset Management accounting system, and in the aggregate in either an
omnibus demand deposit account or GL account on the books of the bank or
its correspondent. The reconciliation of cash totals, as reflected on the Asset
When funds are disbursed from an Asset Management account via check, the
funds are deducted from the account’s cash balance on the Asset
Management accounting system and an Asset Management department check
or internal entry is prepared. Typically, when checks are issued, funds are
transferred from the demand deposit account or GL for uninvested Asset
Management customer cash to a separate demand deposit account or GL
account designated for Asset Management department checks. The total
amount of checks issued but not yet presented for payment should be
reconciled to the balance in this account daily. Exceptions should be
identified and resolved or escalated daily.
The effectiveness of a bank’s records management system may affect both its
efficiency and its risk profile. A bank with an effective records management
system may be less likely to incur financial losses due to critical missing
documents, be better able to defend itself against potential litigation, be less
vulnerable to gaps in service as a result of employee turnover, and be better
able to respond to audits and inquiries from federal and state tax authorities.
Banks should have policies and procedures that identify the proper retention
periods for various records and should ensure that these records are stored,
and at the appropriate time disposed of, with an appropriate level of
information security. Record retention periods should conform to the
requirements of applicable law. For example, OCC Regulation 12 CFR 9.8(b)
requires a national bank to retain account records for a period of three years
from the later of the termination of the account or the termination of any
litigation relating to the account. Longer retention periods may be required by
applicable state law. The BSA/AML rules also include record keeping,
reporting, and record retention requirements. (See the BSA/AML and OFAC
Requirements section later in the booklet and the FFIEC’s Bank Secrecy
Act/Anti-Money Laundering Examination Manual.)
Client Statements
In general, all accounts should receive statements that report activity and
asset positions at least annually; quarterly or monthly statements are more
common. Administrative (front office) staff should not have direct access to
client statements prior to mailing because of the potential for fraud. Bank
staff, independent of the front office staff, should mail client statements, or
this process should be outsourced to a third-party servicer under proper
oversight. Changes to client name and address records and statement
frequency codes should be properly controlled to prevent improper changes
that would prevent a client from receiving statements and detecting
unauthorized account activity.
Some banks offer clients Internet access to their Asset Management accounts.
For guidance on developing appropriate safeguards to mitigate the risks
associated with Internet banking, refer to OCC Bulletin 2005-35
“Authentication in an Internet Banking Environment” and OCC Bulletin 2006-
35 “Authentication in an Internet Banking Environment – Frequently Asked
Questions,” as well as the “E-Banking” booklet of the FFIEC’s Information
Technology Examination Handbook.
Because there are multiple types of Asset Management accounts and client
types, Asset Management accounts may be subject to various IRS information
reporting and tax return filing requirements. Depending upon the account
type, the client type, and the activity in the account, banks may be required
to file reports such as Forms 1099-Int, 1099-Div, 1099-B, 1099-Misc, 1099-
OID, 1099R, or 5498. The IRS may fine a bank for failing to file these reports
with the IRS or for failing to provide reports to bank clients in an accurate and
timely manner. These reports are typically produced by the Asset
Management accounting system or by a separate tax system that is receiving
data directly from the Asset Management accounting system. Proper coding is
needed at the account, asset, and transaction levels to produce accurate
reports. A coordinated effort by Asset Management operations,
administration, and internal or external tax specialists is needed to ensure
timely and accurate production and submission of these IRS reports.
For many accounts, fiduciary, estate, gift, or other tax returns are required.
Failure to file or arrange for the filing of accurate and timely tax returns on
behalf of fiduciary clients can result in significant penalties and reputation
risk. Asset Management accounting systems typically either produce tax
ledger reports or transmit data to tax preparation systems that significantly
automate the tax preparation process. The accuracy of these reports is
dependent upon account-, asset-, and transaction-level coding. Banks need to
ensure that fiduciary tax returns are prepared by qualified professionals
supported by adequate automation capabilities. Banks that use tax preparation
system service providers or other third parties to prepare fiduciary tax returns
should implement adequate vendor oversight and management.
Depending on the type of account and applicable law, each account’s cash
balances should be reported on the Asset Management accounting system as
a single cash portfolio, segregated between income cash and principal cash,
or as segregated among income cash, principal cash, and invested income
cash.
Cash sweep practices should be consistent with the bank’s policies and
procedures to address the investment of funds held as fiduciary, including
short-term investments and the treatment of fiduciary funds awaiting
investment or distribution, which banks are required to adopt in accordance
with OCC Regulation 12 CFR 9.5(e). To the extent that the bank sweeps
fiduciary funds into bank deposit accounts, proprietary funds, or third-party
investments for which the bank receives fees or expense reimbursements, the
bank’s policies, procedures, and practices should reflect the requirements of
OCC Regulation 12 CRF 9.12(a) relating to self-dealing and conflicts of
interest in the investment of fiduciary funds. Refer to the “Conflicts of Interest”
booklet of the Comptroller’s Handbook and OCC Bulletin 2010-37,
“Fiduciary Activities of National Banks: Self-Deposit of Fiduciary Funds” for
further guidance.
Pledge Requirements
A national bank may deposit fiduciary funds that are awaiting investment or
distribution in the commercial, savings, or other department of the bank,
unless prohibited by applicable law. To the extent these funds are not FDIC-
insured, the bank must set aside collateral as security, under the control of
appropriate fiduciary officers and employees. This pledge requirement under
OCC Regulation 12 CFR 9.10 is intended to protect fiduciary funds on
deposit at the fiduciary bank in the event the bank fails. A national bank may
set aside collateral as security for fiduciary funds awaiting investment or
distribution deposited by or with an affiliated insured depository institution,
unless prohibited by applicable law.
To calculate the total amount of collateral required for its fiduciary accounts,
the bank must include the following balances to the extent that they are self-
deposited and exceed applicable FDIC insurance coverage:
funds for checks which have been issued on behalf of fiduciary accounts
but have not yet been paid, and
other cash balances in suspense or operating accounts that can be
identified as belonging to one or more specific fiduciary accounts.
The bank should adopt and implement procedures to ensure that the required
pledge amount is accurately computed; the pledged collateral is eligible
under 12 CFR 9.10(b)(2); the collateral has a market value that at all times
equals or exceeds the required amount; and the collateral is under the control
of appropriate fiduciary officers and employees. Insufficient pledged collateral
can result in noncompliance with law and regulation and can place fiduciary
client funds at risk. Conversely, pledged collateral significantly in excess of
regulatory requirements can adversely affect a bank’s liquidity by committing
an unnecessary portion of the bank’s investment portfolio to secure fiduciary
deposits. For further discussion of self-deposited fiduciary funds, see OCC
Bulletin 2010-37, “Fiduciary Activities of National Banks: Self-Deposit of
Fiduciary Funds.”
Nominee Registration
4
Aggregate balances should not be reduced by the amount of account level overdrafts, or when
netting between income and principal portfolios is not permitted, by the amount of portfolio level
overdrafts.
5
See Appendix G of the “Conflicts of Interest” booklet of the Comptroller’s Handbook for guidance
on distinguishing funds awaiting investment or distribution from funds invested in deposit accounts.
Appropriate risk-based controls over account and asset coding and asset
pricing are necessary to ensure the accuracy of information provided on the
call report. System mapping, which assigns account and asset types to specific
categories, should be periodically reviewed for accuracy and to ensure that
call report data conforms to current instructions for the preparation of the call
report, which can be found on the FFIEC Web site. The automated reports
produced by the Asset Management accounting system should be reviewed
for reasonableness and accuracy before the call report is finalized.
Securities Lending
General
OFAC Screening
There can be severe sanctions against a bank that conducts business with
prohibited countries, organizations, or persons designated by OFAC. To
manage this risk and identify transactions that may be prohibited by
OFAC, banks typically develop policies and procedures for screening
selected transactions (e.g., new customer records, receipts, and
disbursements) posted to the Asset Management accounting system against
a system or database of prohibited parties and locations. For additional
information about OFAC compliance processes and managing OFAC
compliance risk, see the FFIEC’s Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering
Examination Manual core overview section, “Office of Foreign Assets
Control.” A list of current OFAC sanction programs is contained on the
OFAC Web site at www.treas.gov/ofac .
H H
6
Effective March 1, 2011, 31 CFR Part 103 will be moved to 31 CFR Chapter X, and renumbered.
Funds Transfers
31 CFR 103.33 (future 31 CFR 1010.410), “Records to be made and
retained by financial institutions,” requires each bank involved in a funds
transfer of $3,000 or more to collect and retain certain information. The
specific information varies based on whether the bank is the originator’s
(sender’s) bank, an intermediary bank, or the beneficiary’s (recipient’s)
bank, whether the originator is an established customer and whether the
origination request is made in person. Procedures should exist to collect
and retain this information when applicable.
While many fiduciary account grantors and beneficiaries are excluded from
the definition of “customer,” certain Asset Management accounts may be
subject to the privacy policy disclosure and third-party disclosure opt-out
provisions of this regulation. The Asset Management accounting system is
often used to flag which Asset Management customers should receive the
annual privacy notice. In consultation with the bank’s compliance staff, Asset
Management operations should implement procedures to identify the
appropriate recipients of the annual privacy mailing and ensure that these
notices are provided. For further information, see OCC Bulletin 2001-26,
“Privacy of Consumer Financial Information.”
Notice of Change in Control (Bank Stock and Bank Holding Company Stock)
A bank that, through its fiduciary activities, acquires sole voting authority over
10 percent or more of any class of its own or another bank’s outstanding
stock must consider the regulatory requirements that may be applicable under
the Bank Holding Company Act, 12 USC 1841, et seq., and the Change in
Bank Control Act, 12 USC 1817(j).
in the event that the fiduciary has sole discretionary authority to vote
the securities, and it retains the securities and the authority to vote the
securities for more than two years, the fiduciary must then obtain board
approval to hold the securities; or
in the event that the fiduciary acquires the securities for the benefit of
the acquiring bank or other company, or its shareholders, employees,
or subsidiaries, the fiduciary must obtain board approval to hold the
securities.
The OCC regulation implementing the Change in Bank Control Act, 12 CFR
5.50, exempts from its requirements certain fiduciary acquisitions covered by
the Bank Holding Company Act. See 12 CFR 5.50(c)(2)(iv). National bank
fiduciaries should examine these regulatory provisions carefully to ensure that
the exemption applies to their specific transactions. For further guidance, see
the “Change in Bank Control” booklet of the Comptroller’s Licensing Manual.
Planning Activities
Objective: To review the quantity of risk and the quality of risk management
relating to Asset Management operations and controls to establish the timing,
scope, and work plans for the supervisory activity.
OCC files:
- Supervisory strategy.
- EIC’s scope memorandum.
- Follow-up activities.
- Periodic monitoring comments.
- Risk assessment system ratings.
- Uniform Interagency Trust Rating System (UITRS) ratings.
Internal and external audit reports.
Operational risk management reports.
Credit risk management reports.
Compliance reports.
Any other internal or external information deemed pertinent.
6. Using what you have learned from these procedures and from
discussions with the Asset Management and/or bank EIC, determine the
scope of this examination and its objectives. Decisions concerning the
use of expanded procedures should be clearly documented. Determine
examination work assignments.
8. Prepare and send to the bank a request letter that provides the
following:
9. Review the requested information that has been provided by the bank
and determine its completeness.
New products.
New markets.
Changes in technology.
Acquisitions or divestitures.
Outsourcing arrangements.
Management changes.
8. Review the types and volumes of products and transactions that expose
the bank to counterparty credit risk to determine the level of credit risk
associated with asset management operations. Consider:
3. Evaluate the bank’s due diligence process for gathering and analyzing
information on the servicer prior to entering into a contract.
4. Evaluate the bank’s contract review process for service providers used
by Asset Management operations. Consider whether servicer contracts
are reviewed to ensure that:
1. Assess the bank’s process for monitoring and limiting credit exposure
for client overdrafts.
3. Evaluate the extent to which the bank considers credit risk when
considering the use of third-party custodians or safekeeping assets with
brokerage firms.
Note: Adequacy and scope of the audit coverage may affect the level
of examiner testing and sampling of control activities. Whenever
possible, evaluate the audit early in the examination process.
Refer to the “Internal and External Audits” booklet of the
Comptroller’s Handbook for additional procedures.
2. Review the internal audit findings and evaluate the nature of issues
noted and corrective action taken.
3. Review the internal control self-assessment program and any
compliance or other internal reviews, if applicable. Evaluate the
coverage of the program, the nature of issues noted, and corrective
action taken.
6. Evaluate the bank’s reconciliation processes for cash, asset, and other
house/suspense accounts for monitoring the accuracy of the accounting
controls for its Asset Management activities. Consider the following:
All house accounts have been identified and are being monitored.
New house accounts are established only after management
approves their stated purpose.
House account activity is independently monitored.
House accounts are reconciled and reviewed by independent
personnel, and aged items have trigger dates for escalation to senior
management.
9. Review the bank’s complaint file and determine whether there are any
systemic operational risk issues that have not been properly addressed
by management.
Pledge Requirements
Bank Secrecy Act—12 CFR 21.21 and 31 CFR 103 (future 31 CFR Chapter X)
Unclaimed Property
Has reported any lost or stolen securities to the SIC and followed
SIC procedures.
Makes inquiries to the SIC to determine whether securities received
under certain circumstances are lost or stolen.
4. Evaluate the bank’s corporate actions process. For both mandatory and
voluntary actions, consider whether:
Objective: Review record keeping for compliance with 12 CFR 9.8, 12 CFR 12,
and other applicable law. Determine whether the bank:
Objective: Given the size and complexity of the bank, determine whether bank
management and personnel display acceptable knowledge and technical
skills to manage its operational and control activities.
(Name)
(Title)
(Bank)
(Address)
(City, State Zip Code)
In order for us to prepare effectively for this examination, please provide the
information listed in the attachment to this request letter by (date). To protect the
confidentiality of this information, all data should be transmitted to us in a secure
manner. There are several methods by which this can be accomplished,
including encrypted and password-protected media or use of OCC Secure Mail.
To the extent possible, please provide the information in digital format. We will
work with you to determine the most convenient method to exchange the
information in a secure manner. Any hard copy documents that need to be
returned at the conclusion of the examination should be marked accordingly. If
you have questions about this request, you can contact me at (phone #) or by e-
mail (e-mail address).
Sincerely,
Name
Title
cc:
General Information
9. Current policy regarding operational gains and losses for both ERISA and
non-ERISA accounts.
11. Describe all instances in XXXX (current year) and XXXX (prior year) in
which an officer, director, or employee is believed to have embezzled,
misappropriated, or criminally misused fiduciary funds or property.
13. Copy of most recent quarterly and most recent end-of-year Schedule RC-
T of the call report, and contact information for individual responsible for
preparing the report.
Control Functions
15. A copy of the internal Asset Management operations audit plan and audit
program and/or external auditor engagement letter.
20. Copies of any other reviews by internal control units (e.g. risk
management) with respect to Asset Management operations. Provide a
list of any outstanding items.
24. User access report for Asset Management accounting system and for any
systems used by Asset Management operations to access depositories or
third-party custodians, initiate wire transfers, or otherwise control the
movement of funds or assets.
26. The processes to ensure joint custody or control over money movement
(i.e., checks, ACH, and wire transfer).
31. A copy of major service providers’ business continuity plans. Provide the
date it was last tested and the results of the test.
33. A list of demand deposit, suspense, house, and GL accounts used by the
Asset Management division, indicating account name, number, type, and
purpose, and name of person responsible for reconciliation.
34. Current demand deposit account, house and suspense account, GL and
asset safekeeping reconciliations. List of reconciliation exceptions sorted
by age of exception. Include status documentation for items more than
90 days old.
38. Provide a list of overdrafts greater than $_______, which includes name,
amount, and date the overdraft occurred. For any overdraft that has been
outstanding more than five days, include account officer name, and a
brief explanation of why the overdraft occurred and when and how it
will be cleared.
40. Describe procedures to ensure that appropriate collateral is set aside for
self-deposited fiduciary funds awaiting investment or distribution.
Provide a copy of most recent analysis, and a current depository or sub-
custodian statement listing securities set aside for this purpose.
Regulations
OCC Issuances