Running Head: ASSESSMENTS 1
Running Head: ASSESSMENTS 1
Running Head: ASSESSMENTS 1
Differentiated Assessments
Nicole Rodamer
National University
TED 531
Abstract
This paper is based on a mid-unit 3 math quiz in a fourth grade class. Included is a description of
the lessons leading up to the quiz and the California content standards. Also attached is sample
work from a GATE identified student, and English Language Learner, and a student with special
The lesson and assessment took place in a 4th grade classroom in Fremont, Ca. The idea
of differentiating assessment is too allow all students an equal opportunity of being successful at
demonstrating their knowledge. Just as every student learns differently or needs special
adaptations for instruction, there are students who do not test well in a tradition setting.
Assessment adaptations are not to give the student an unfair advantage over the rest of the class,
rather to give them the support they need to have a fair assessment.
In the Everday Math text used in the classroom, unit 3 has 12 chapters; and so it was
decided that after the first week of instruction, it was important to assess how the students were
coming along. “School often casts assessment as something that happens at the end of a unit to
see who “got it” and who didn’t. In fact, assessment is most useful when it comes at the outset of
a unit or along the way in a unit. At those points, assessment invites us to adjust our teaching
based on current information” (Tomlinson, 2001, p.20). There were 5 lessons leading up to the
quiz. The class has a math routine in which helps focus and organize the information for the
students to easily access. Students start with “Math Boxes” a worksheet in their books; the math
boxes help students warm up their math brains and are a bit of a refresher of the previous day’s
lesson. White boards are used after the students have had a chance to warm up; during white
boards, teacher states a problem and students write their answers on the white board and shows
their answer. White boards are not only a great warm up, but a great quick and informal daily
assessment. During this week, students practiced multiplication facts, multiples, and factors on
their white boards. After warms up and white boards, there is a daily lesson, independent practice
in the student’s math journals, and a quick closing recap of the day’s lesson.
Assessment 4
function machine chart to help see how it works. The second lesson was
Factors, products, and factor pairs were the vocabulary words used in
times tests, and learned how to use and study fact triangles. Day 4 and 5 were continued lessons
of the fact triangles, multiplication charts and how division is just the opposite
of multiplication and the same tools can be used to learn and memorize their
division facts. After a week of practice, students were ready to have a short
mid-unit quiz. This assessment was helpful to the teacher to know if students
could move forwards in the chapter, or if we needed to spend more time practicing simple
The corresponding California content standards to this lesson and assessment are: 3.0
Students solve problems involving addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division of whole
The assessment given was a short 4 question quiz, students were asked to list factor pairs,
multiples, and fill in a function machine chart. There were a couple of adaptations provided in
order to allow all students in the classroom equal access to the information. For both the ELL
and special needs students, I allowed them to take the quiz at the back table with me. This
allowed me to be able to quickly answer their questions and provide assistance when I saw them
need it. By having the special needs student at the table with me, I was also able to keep him
focused on the quiz, one question at a time, and not allowing him to get off task. I first allowed
the students to try the problems on their own; but once I saw they were not doing the problem
Assessment 5
correctly, I stopped them and discussed the vocabulary and what the problem was asking them to
do. “If a student misses a question, help the student take corrective action” (Wong, 2009, p 255).
The student knew how to do the problem correctly, it was just a matter of a little bit of prompting
and rephrasing the questions. Secondly, I allowed the students (who needed it) more time to
finish the quiz, while the rest of the class moved onto the next assignment. The third adaption
was that the students were allowed to use their multiplication charts as a reference tool.
I thought it was unnecessary to make a different quiz for the gifted students, but rather
allow them to do a bonus question if they wanted. I wrote a “super challenge” question on the
board and allowed students to try the extra question if they had completed their quiz early. My
GATE student actually is a very slow and thorough worker, and he took his time during the quiz.
He was unable to complete the bonus questions, but that was due to a lack of time, and not skill;
The assessments went well, and most students did well. There were some other “high
performing” students who rushed through the quiz and didn’t do as well as they should have, but
they learned a lesson of slowing down and checking their work. The ELL and special needs
students would not have done as well on the quiz if they did not have help, but the purpose of the
quiz was not to give the students grades, but rather to assess their current understanding of the
math unit. Scaffolding the quiz, without giving the students the answers allowed them to
demonstrate their knowledge. “Assessments are used as the basis for flexible grouping patterns
to focus on reteaching critical skills and concepts students need for standards mastery. Students
who have mastered the standards proceed to the next level of skills” (Ventriglia, 2012, p 13).
Assessment 6
References
Ventriglia, L. (2010). Differentiated Instruction The Rule of Foot (8th ed.). Mexico:
YounglightEducate.
Wong, H. K., & Wong, R. T. (2009). The first days of school: how to be an effective teacher.