Final Synthesis Activity
Final Synthesis Activity
Final Synthesis Activity
Jessica S. Smith
1. Attitude is everything
It does not matter how smart a person is, how young a person is, or where they live. If the
person does not have a positive attitude, if the person is not willing to take risks, and if the
person does not invest the time necessary into learning the language; the person will not learn the
Children have many benefits to learning a second language. They are less inhibited and
they take more risks. They are also able to have a more native accent if they learn a second
language before puberty. Since they start learning when they are younger, they have more time
to be able to perfect the language. Adults tend to do better at grammatical structures and are able
to learn concepts more quickly. Adults can use strategies to overcome inhibitions and find the
time and proper motivation for language learning in order to be more successful.
Second language learners view their second language through the filter of their first
language. Constructs in a second language that are similar for a student’s native language are
easy for them to learn. Constructs that do not have a native language equivalent are harder to
Students vary in their personalities, their learning styles, and their interests. Right
brained, extroverts make great language learners, but they are not the only ones who can learn a
language. It is important to take into consideration students’ personalities, learning styles, and
their interests in order to meet their needs and ensure a successful language learning experience.
5. There are many strategies that can be used to aid language learning
prior knowledge, using senses, and contextualizing (Brown, 2014, pg. 126). Affective strategies
such as being supportive of oneself, reducing negative emotions, motivation oneself, and having
a positive attitude can be extremely useful (Brown, 2014, pg. 127). Sociocultural interactive
strategies are interacting to learn, guessing, and starting conversations (Brown, 2014, pg. 127).
The reason why young children normally do so well at learning a second language is that
they are placed in meaningful language learning situations on a daily basis at school. If they want
to have friends and please the people around them, they must learn the language. Providing
meaning on that level is difficult in the classroom, but it must be attempted. Interesting content
and interaction with others needs to be considered very carefully when designing a lesson.
Students need a lot of quality input for language learning to occur. That often times is not
enough. For students to progress adequately, they need feedback to help them recognize and
FINAL SYNTHESIS ACTIVITY 4
correct their errors. When doing activities, meaning is the most important, but form must be
Study abroad is helpful in that it forces students to interact with language in authentic and
meaningful ways. It ensures that people are immersed in the language despite one’s time
constraints he or she faces at home. However, a language can be learned at home especially if
they same amount of time is devoted to content that is meaningful. Study abroad also has some
negative consequences like homesickness and culture shock that can hinder the language
learning experience.
9. Culture is important
successful at interacting with native speakers. According to Baker-Smemoe, Dewey, Bown, and
Martinsen (2014) students who has the most cultural sensitivity had the largest gains on their
language growth.
Being able to understand someone goes beyond the words that come out of their mouth.
It’s important to be able to recognize what a person is feeling or how he or she is interpreting
what is being said. This is especially important when a language learner says something that
This course has really dispelled a lot of myths I had about language learning. I have
always really felt that since I was unable to spend a year abroad due to having my daughter so
young that I missed out on the opportunity to attain the level of fluency that I desired. During the
two summer trips I did have abroad, I made so much gain in such a short period of time that I
was further convinced that this was true. I now realize that this is not entirely the case and that if
I were to be able to devote as much time and energy to my studies at home that I would continue
to make improvements.
While traveling this summer, I am going to implement many of the affective strategies I
France. I am also going to keep my friend in mind who is not a native English speaker in mind
when I make mistakes. I am going to keep a journal while I am there and set affective goals for
myself. I now have a new mantra: Taking risks is more important than being right.
I have also realized that creating meaningful content is much more important than I had
originally thought. I am going to continue to work to create lessons that are engaging and
exciting for my students. From our Marie Antoinette class, I found that I could incorporate
something I learned about her and the French Revolution into nearly every unit that we do. This
is something that would really excite my students in my opinion so much more than just learning
vocabulary and talking about themselves at a very basic level would. I know my students would
love learning about the monkey in the palace running around putting on makeup much more than
they care about being able to say “The monkey is in the zoo.”
FINAL SYNTHESIS ACTIVITY 6
This also brings me to the issue of culture. I feel that I am often forced to get rid of
cultural activities in order to do things like gather more data how many vocabulary words
students know and other administrative things. I know culture is important to language learning
and this class has further emphasized its importance. I am going to fight to include culture and
make more of an effort to combine it with the vocabulary we are learning so they go hand in
hand.
FINAL SYNTHESIS ACTIVITY 7
There are many advantages and disadvantages to learning a language as both a child and
an adult. One is not necessarily better than the other. Ultimately, successfully learning a
language comes down to the quality and duration of input the learner is exposed to, the
opportunity the learner has to produce the language in meaningful ways, and the student’s desire
The Critical Period Hypothesis is the belief that there is a small window of time in a
person’s life that he or she must learn a second language by if they are going to achieve native
like fluency (Gass, 2013, pg. 434). According to the hypothesis, if the learner misses this critical
time period, native fluency will not be possible. The Critical Period Hypothesis forms the basis
for the belief that a person is always better off learning a language at a younger age.
In my opinion, the biggest advantage that a child had over an adult learner is the affective
area. Adult language learners typically have more inhibitions than child language learners
(Brown, 2014). Children have not fully developed their language ego and the desire to save face
is not as strong; therefore, children are more likely to take risks and make mistakes in their
language learning (Brown, 2014). As a result, this gives them the opportunity to produce the
language more, receive more corrective feedback, and grow as a language learner. An adult who
is reluctant to speak for fear of making a mistake will not have as many opportunities for
feedback, nor as many opportunities to self-edit his or her working language based on the input
According to Brown, “Some adults have been known to acquire an authentic accent in a
second language after the age of puberty, but such individuals are exceptional” (Brown, 2014,
pg. 57). The one real advantage that children have in learning a language may not really be an
advantage at all. Research indicates that there is no such thing as a native accent as native
speakers’ accents vary so much from region to region and country to country (Brown, 2014). As
accent would also be considered foreign to people living in the South. In any of those places it
would be apparent that I am an outsider. Unless a person is learning a language for the sole
purpose of spending the rest of his or her life in the same area of the same country, having an
accent is not that significant and typically does not interfere with one’s ability to communicate or
be understood.
For children over seven the quality of the input they receive is the biggest determinant of
success (Gass, 2013). Children who move to a new country, go to new schools, and develop
friends they are close to that speak the target are much more likely to be more successful
language learners than adults who move to a new country. The reason for this is that adults often
do not receive as much meaningful input as children do. For example, if an adult moves with his
or her spouse, he or she still has meaningful interaction in his or her native language which
supersedes that of his or her second language. If the adult has a job with speakers of his or her
second language and has friends who are speakers of the second language, that person will have
The amount of time spent being exposed to input and practicing output are also important
factors in determining how well a child or adult can acquire a second language. In a study of
Chinese speakers, Bialystok found that “age of onset of learning does not have significant
effects, and that there is some support for the importance of length of stay in the target culture”
(Gass, 2013, pg. 438). The younger a person learns a language, the more time they have in life to
receive additional input and correct their errors (Gass, 2013, pg. 437).
While there are many benefits to learning a second language younger in life, there are just
a many benefits to learning a language later in life. “In general, children have a better phonology,
but older learners often achieve better syntax” (Gass, 2013, 118). This means that adults are
better able to understand the grammatical forms and the structure of the language. Therefore,
they will be able to use patters to produce more structures more quickly than children will who
Adults and children both make comparisons between their native language and their
second languages while they are learning. Adults have a more complete understanding of their
language than children do. As a result, they are able to make more comparisons more quickly
and ultimately make more connections increasing their knowledge of the second language.
Adults tend to do better on criterion scores than children do with similar amounts of language
According to Table 3.1, the only things that adults truly have that are working against
them are accents and affective factors such as inhibition, language ego, identity, and attitude as
mentioned above (Brown, 2014, pg. 69). The other attributes have not been proven to be affected
FINAL SYNTHESIS ACTIVITY 10
by the age of the learner. As teachers, part of the reason we study second language acquisition is
so that we can help learners determine what they need to do in order to be successful at learning
a second language. Adults can learn strategies to manage their inhibitions and make up for the
affective issues that they have. As teachers, we can create a safe space for students to learn and
Ultimately, age is not the real issue that affects how well a person learns a language.
Students can learn languages at any age. They just require authentic, meaningful input, the
opportunity for language production, the desire to learn a language, and the time to do so.
FINAL SYNTHESIS ACTIVITY 11
References
Baker-Smemoe, W., Dewey, D. P., Bown, J., & Martinsen, R. A. (2014). Variables affecting L2
doi:10.1111/flan.12093
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching. 6th edition. Pearson.