Introduction
Introduction
Introduction
Intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) is a broad term used to describe a multitude of
lifelong disabilities that negatively affect the individual in the areas of intellectual and/or physical
development (NICHD, 2012). Common Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) categories
included under the IDD term are autism and intellectual disabilities (ID). ID is defined as having
impacting deficits in both intellectual functioning and adaptive behaviors (American Psychiatric
Association, 2013). Current studies estimate that around 1% of the world population is affected by ID
(McKenzie, Milton, Smith, & Ouellette-Kuntz, 2016). Autism is defined as a developmental disability that
affects the individual’s social abilities, including deficits in communication, executive functioning, and
sensory processing (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Current international studies suggest that
just over 1% of the world population is diagnosed with autism (Özerk, 2016). Both ID and autism have
recently had changes to their diagnostic criteria and definitions that may affect future diagnosis (Kulage,
Smaldone, & Cohn, 2014; Social Security Administration, 2013). Individuals with IDD have some of the
worst reported outcomes through transition and into adulthood (Lipscomb et al., 2017).
Community-Based Services
In the past 40 years, there has been an ongoing movement of deinstitutionalization in favor of
more community-based services for people with disabilities in the United States (Buell, 2003). This
movement has been supported heavily through legislation, such as IDEA, Americans with Disabilities Act,
and the Higher Education Opportunities Act. This, along with an increasing number of aging individuals
with IDD (Hogg, Lucchino, Wang, & Janicki, 2001; Patja, Iivanainen, Vesala, Oksanen, & Ruoppila, 2000),
has resulted in a need for special education services and related services for an older population within
a community setting.
As the number of people with IDD living within their communities has increased, the idea and
importance of the quality of life of people with IDD has become a topic of research (Brown, Hatton, &
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 2
Emerson, 2013; Burgess & Gutstein, 2007). Quality of life is a social construct used to describe the
satisfaction derived from various aspects of an individual’s life, or more simply as a descriptor for what it
means to have a good life (Bishop-Fitzpatrick et al., 2016). Quality of life has been used to measure
satisfaction across a variety of people with a variety disabilities, disorders, or diseases. Schalock and
colleagues (2005) validated a list of 24 indicators of quality of life that fit into eight domains. The
domains are emotional well-being, interpersonal relations, material well-being, personal development,
physical well-being, self-determination, social inclusion, and rights. There is some disagreement on the
number of factors; some researchers add, subtract, or combine factors and indicators from Schalock and
his colleagues (Brown et al., 2013; Moss, Mandy, & Howlin, 2017). There is also debate on the
importance or the predictive nature of particular indicators over other indicators, but the core domains
are generally accepted (Burgess & Gutstein, 2007). An overarching theme of autonomy over one’s
choices in life is evident throughout the literature as an integral measure of an individual’s quality of life
(Kostikj-Ivanovikj & Chichevska-Jovanova, 2016; Moro, Savage, & Gehlert, 2017; Simões & Santos, 2016).
Some of the domains are fixed or externally controlled (i.e. rights, financial status, or health),
but many others are areas that could be influenced through targeted intervention. As the focus on
transition and community-based services has increased, a large amount of research and education has
centered around employment as a pathway to increasing the quality of life for individuals with
intellectual disabilities (Cawthon, Wendel, Bond, & Garberoglio, 2016; Dague, 2012; McConnell, Martin,
& Hennessey, 2015). Social inclusion (Hall, 2017; Qian, Tichá, Larson, Stancliffe, & Wuorio, 2015), self-
regulation (Eisenman, 2007; Shogren, Palmer, Wehmeyer, Williams-Diehm, & Little, 2012; Shogren &
Shaw, 2016), and education (Thoma et al., 2011) are other areas of intervention with the goal of
Independent Living
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 3
With much of the focus of intervention research in this area being on employment skills in
preparing to transition out of secondary education (Rogan, Updike, Chesterfield, & Savage, 2014; Test et
al., 2009; Winsor & Butterworth, 2008), only a small amount of time preparing for adulthood during
secondary transitional education is focused on improving independent living skill (Haber et al., 2016).
Independent living is often defined by the skills that make up the construct including: personal self-care,
personal management, activities of daily living, financial management, and management of health needs
(Rowe et al., 2015). Individuals with IDD have deficits in independent living that grow in discrepancy
from the skills of their typically-developing peers as they age (Belva & Matson, 2013). As most of the
intervention and teaching of skills related to independent living happens in adulthood, the discrepancies
are already impacting multiple areas, including employability. The discrepancies make it a necessity for
these individuals with IDD to be dependent on either their family (often aging parents) or service
providers (Boehm, Carter, & Taylor, 2015; Esbensen, Bishop, Seltzer, Greenberg, & Taylor, 2010),
Various interventions have been used to teach independent living skills to individuals with IDD
across the lifespan. A recent meta-analysis of single-case studies (Ninci et al., 2015) identified four
common intervention method categories that the studies fit into: audio cueing, behavioral in vivo, visual
cueing, and video modeling. This meta-analysis also found that a majority of included studies were with
adults while the greatest effects were found in elementary-aged individuals suggesting the need for
The purpose of this review is to identify the interventions used to teach independent living skills
to adults with IDD with the intent to establish potential interventions to use with secondary students
with IDD to increase skills in the areas of independent living prior to transitioning out of secondary
education placements. The research questions for this study are as follows:
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 4
Question 1: What are the interventions being used to teach independent living skills to students
Question 2: Which of these interventions have been evaluated through experimental methods?
Question 3: What educational methodology is being used within the experimental approaches?
Question 5: What are the effect sizes of the various identified interventions?
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 5
American Psychiatric Association (Ed.). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders:
Belva, B. C., & Matson, J. L. (2013). An examination of specific daily living skills deficits in adults with
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.021
Bishop-Fitzpatrick, L., Hong, J., Smith, L., Makuch, R., Greenberg, J., & Mailick, M. (2016). Characterizing
objective quality of life and normative outcomes in adults with autism spectrum disorder: An
exploratory latent class analysis. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 46, 2707–2719.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2816-3
Boehm, T. L., Carter, E. W., & Taylor, J. L. (2015). Family quality of life during the transition to adulthood
for individuals with intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders. American Journal on
120.5.395
Brown, I., Hatton, C., & Emerson, E. (2013). Quality of life indicators for individuals with intellectual
disabilities: Extending current practice. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 316–332.
https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.316
service delivery implications. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 26, 221–
260.
Burgess, A. F., & Gutstein, S. E. (2007). Quality of life for people with autism: Raising the standard for
evaluating successful outcomes. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 12(2), 80–86.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2006.00432.x
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 6
Cawthon, S. W., Wendel, E. M., Bond, M. P., & Garberoglio, C. L. (2016). The impact of intensive
vocation-related course taking on employment outcomes for individuals who are deaf. Remedial
http://mutex.gmu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh
&AN=77634592&site=ehost-live
http://mutex.gmu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh
&AN=23768812&site=ehost-live
Esbensen, A. J., Bishop, S., Seltzer, M. M., Greenberg, J. S., & Taylor, J. L. (2010). Comparisons between
individuals with autism spectrum disorders and individuals With Down syndrome in adulthood.
https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-115.4.277
Haber, M. G., Mazzotti, V. L., Mustian, A. L., Rowe, D. A., Bartholomew, A. L., Test, D. W., & Fowler, C. H.
(2016). What works, when, for whom, and with whom: A Meta-analytic review of predictors of
postsecondary success for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 86(1),
123–162. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315583135
Hall, S. A. (2017). Community involvement of young adults with intellectual disabilities: Their
Hogg, J., Lucchino, R., Wang, K., & Janicki, M. (2001). Healthy ageing -- Adults with intellectual
disabilities: Ageing and social policy. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 14(3),
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 7
http://mutex.gmu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh
&AN=6075268&site=ehost-live
Kostikj-Ivanovikj, V., & Chichevska-Jovanova, N. (2016). Relation between quality of life, choice making,
and future expectations in adults with intellectual disabilty. Journal of Special Education &
Kulage, K. M., Smaldone, A. M., & Cohn, E. G. (2014). How will DSM-5 affect autism diagnosis? A
systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
Lipscomb, S., Hamison, J., Liu Albert, Y., Burghardt, J., Johnson, D. R., & Thurlow, M. (2017). Preparing
for life after high school: the characteristics and experiences of youth in special education.
Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 2: Comparisons across
disability groups. Full report. NCEE 2017-4018. National Center for Education Evaluation and
Regional Assistance.
McConnell, A. E., Martin, J. E., & Hennessey, M. N. (2015). Indicators of postsecondary employment and
education for youth with disabilities in relation to GPA and general education. Remedial &
McKenzie, K., Milton, M., Smith, G., & Ouellette-Kuntz, H. (2016). Systematic review of the prevalence
and incidence of intellectual disabilities: Current trends and issues. Current Developmental
Moro, T. T., Savage, T. A., & Gehlert, S. (2017). Agency, social and healthcare supports for adults with
Moss, P., Mandy, W., & Howlin, P. (2017). Child and adult factors related to quality of life in adults with
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3105-5
NICHD. (2012). Intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs): Condition information. Retrieved
https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/idds/conditioninfo/Pages/default.aspx
Ninci, J., Neely, L. C., Hong, E. R., Boles, M. B., Gilliland, W. D., Ganz, J. B., … Vannest, K. J. (2015). Meta-
analysis of single-case research on teaching functional living skills to individuals with ASD.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-014-0046-1
Özerk, K. (2016). The issue of prevalence of autism/ASD. International Electronic Journal of Elementary
http://mutex.gmu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh
&AN=120560715&site=ehost-live
Patja, K., Iivanainen, M., Vesala, H., Oksanen, H., & Ruoppila, I. (2000). Life expectancy of people with
intellectual disability: A 35-year follow-up study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR,
44, 591–599.
Qian, X., Tichá, R., Larson, S. A., Stancliffe, R. J., & Wuorio, A. (2015). The impact of individual and
community group homes: a multilevel model. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59,
493–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12152
Rogan, P., Updike, J., Chesterfield, G., & Savage, S. (2014). The SITE program at IUPUI: A post-secondary
program for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 40,
109–116. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-140673
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 9
Rowe, D. A., Alverson, C. Y., Unruh, D. K., Fowler, C. H., Kellems, R., & Test, D. W. (2015). A Delphi study
Schalock, R. L., Verdugo, M. A., Jenaro, C., Wang, M., Wehmeyer, M., Jiancheng, X., & Lachapelle, Y.
(2005). Cross-cultural study of quality of life Indicators. American Journal on Mental Retardation,
Shogren, K. A., Palmer, S. B., Wehmeyer, M. L., Williams-Diehm, K., & Little, T. D. (2012). Effect of
intervention with the self-determined learning model of instruction on access and goal
https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511410072
Shogren, K. A., & Shaw, L. A. (2016). The role of autonomy, self-realization, and psychological
empowerment in predicting outcomes for youth with disabilities. Remedial and Special
Simões, C., & Santos, S. (2016). Comparing the quality of life of adults with and without intellectual
https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12256
Test, D. W., Mazzotti, V. L., Mustian, A. L., Fowler, C. H., Kortering, L., & Kohler, P. (2009). Evidence-
based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with
https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809346960
Thoma, C. A., Lakin, K. C., Carlson, D., Domzal, C., Austin, K., & Boyd, K. (2011). Participation in
postsecondary education for students with intellectual disabilities: A review of the literature
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 10
2001-2010. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 24, 175–191. Retrieved from
http://mutex.gmu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh
&AN=78175885&site=ehost-live
Winsor, J., & Butterworth, J. (2008). Participation in integrated employment and community-based
nonwork services for individuals supported by state disability agencies. Intellectual &