Intellectual Property Code of The Philippines: Rules and Regulations On Inventions

Back to Top - Back to Home - Back to Main Index
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CODE

OF THE PHILIPPINES
Republic Act No. 8293
RULES AND REGULATIONS ON

INVENTIONS
FULL TEXT
RULES AND REGULATIONS
ON INVENTIONS
WHEREAS, the State recognizes that an effective industrial

property system is vital to the development of domestic creativity,
facilitates transfer of technology, attracts foreign investments and
ensures market access for our products;
WHEREAS, it is the policy of the State to streamline administrative

procedures in granting patents and enhance the enforcement of
intellectual property rights in the Philippines;
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions of Republic Act No.

8293, otherwise known as the Intellectual Property Code of the
Philippines, the following rules and regulations on inventions are
hereby promulgated: cha nrob lesvi rtua lawlib rary
PART 1
DEFINITIONS
Rule 100. Definitions. Unless otherwise specified, the following
terms shall have the meaning provided in this Rule:
(a) “Bureau” means the Bureau of Patents of the Office;
(b) “Director” means the Director of the Bureau of Patents;
(c) “Director General” means the Head of the Intellectual Property

Office;
(d) “Examiner” means any officer or employee of the Bureau of

Patents authorized to examine applications. The title or official
designation of such officer or employee may change as the
structure of the Office may be set;
(e) “IP Code” means Republic Act No. 8293 otherwise known as the
Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines;
(f) “IPO Gazette” means the Intellectual Property Office’s own

publication where all matters required to be published under the IP
Code shall be published;
(g) “Office” means the Intellectual Property Office; and
(h) “Regulations” means this set of rules and regulations and such
Rules of Practice as may be formulated by the Director of Patents and
approved by the Director General.
PART 2
PATENTABILITY
Rule 200. Patentable inventions. Any technical solution of a

problem in any field of human activity which is new, involves an
inventive step and is industrially applicable shall be patentable. [Sec.
21, IP Code]
Rule 201. Statutory classes of invention. An invention may be,
or may relate to:
a) a useful machine;
b) a product;
c) or process or an improvement of any of the foregoing;
d) microorganism; and
e) non-biological and microbiological processes. [Sec. 21, IP
Code]
Rule 202. Non-patentable inventions. The following shall be

excluded from patent protection:
(a) Discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical
method;
(b) Schemes, rules and methods of performing mental acts,

playing games or doing business, and programs for
computers;
(c) Methods for treatment of the human or animal body by

surgery or therapy and diagnostic methods practiced on the
human or animal body. This provision shall not apply to
products and compositions for use in any of these methods;
(d) Plant varieties or animal breeds or essentially biological

process for the production of plants or animals. This
provision shall not apply to microorganisms and
non-biological and microbiological processes;
(e) Aesthetic creations; and
(f) Anything which is contrary to public order or morality. [Sec.

22, IP Code]
Rule 203. Novelty. An invention shall not be considered new if it

forms part of a prior art. [Sec. 23, IP Code]
Rule 204. Prior art. Prior art shall consist of:
(a) Everything made available to the public by means of a
written or oral disclosure, by use, or in any other way, before
the filing date or the priority date of the application claiming
the invention. Prior use which is not present in the
Philippines, even if widespread in a foreign country, cannot
form part of the prior art if such prior use is not disclosed in
printed documents or in any tangible form.
(b) The whole contents of an application for a patent, utility

model, or industrial design registration, published under
Sec. 44 of IP Code, filed or effective in the Philippines, with a
filing or priority date that is earlier than the filing or priority
date of the application: Provided, That the application
which has validly claimed the filing date of an earlier
application under Section 31 of IP Code, shall be prior art
with effect as of the filing date of such earlier application:
Provided further, That the applicant or the inventor identified
in both applications are not one and the same. [Sec. 24, IP Code]
Where two or more applications are independently filed with

respect to the same invention, and the later applications are filed
before the first application or earlier application is published, the
whole contents of the first or earliest filed application published in
accordance with Sec. 44, IP Code on or after the filing date or
priority date of the later filed application shall be novelty
destroying with respect to the later filed application.
Rule 205. Non-prejudicial disclosure. The disclosure of

information contained in the application during the twelve (12)
months preceding the filing date or the priority date of the
application shall not prejudice the applicant on the ground of lack
of novelty if such disclosure was made by:
(a) The inventor;
(b) A foreign patent office, the Bureau or the Office, and the
information was contained (a) in another application filed by
the inventor and should not have been disclosed by the
office, or (b) in an application filed without the knowledge or
consent of the inventor by a third party which obtained the
information directly or indirectly from the inventor; or
(c) A third party which obtained the information directly or

indirectly from the inventor.
For purposes of subsection (a), “inventor” also means any person

who, at the filing date of application, had the right to the
patent. [Sec. 25, IP Code]
Rule 206. Inventive step. (a) An invention involves an

inventive step if, having regard to prior art, it is not obvious to a
“person skilled in the art” at the time of the filing date or priority
date of the application claiming the invention. [Sec. 26, IP Code]
(b) Only prior art made available to the public before the filing date
or priority date shall be considered in assessing inventive step.
Rule 207. Person skilled in the art. The person skilled in the art
is presumed to be an ordinary practitioner aware of what was common
general knowledge in the art at the relevant date. He is presumed
to have knowledge of all references that are sufficiently related to
one another and to the pertinent art and to have knowledge of all arts
reasonably pertinent to the particular problems with which the
inventor was involved. He is presumed also to have had at his
disposal the normal means and capacity for routine work and
experimentation.
Rule 208. Industrial applicability. An invention which can

be produced and used in any industry shall be industrially applicable.
[Sec. 27, IP Code] chanroblesvirtual awlibr ary
PART 3
RIGHT TO A PATENT
Rule 300. Right to a patent. The right to a patent belongs to the

inventor, his heirs, or assigns. When two (2) or more persons
have jointly made an invention, the right to a patent shall belong to
them jointly. [Sec. 28, IP Code]
Rule 301. Who may be named in an application as an

applicant. The application may be filed by the actual inventor(s)
or in the name of his heirs, legal representative or assigns.
Rule 302. Inventions created pursuant to a commission. The

person who commissions the work shall own the patent, unless
otherwise provided in the contract. [Sec. 30.1, IP Code]
Rule 303. Inventions made in the course of employment. In case

the employee made the invention in the course of his employment
contract, the patent shall belong to:
(a) The employee, if the inventive activity is not a part of
his regular duties even if the employee uses the time,
facilities and materials of the employer
(b) The employer, if the invention is the result of the

performance of his regularly-assigned duties, unless there is
an agreement, express or implied, to the contrary. [Sec. 30.2, IP
Code]
Rule 304. First to file rule. If two (2) or more persons have made
the same invention separately and independently of each other,
the right to the patent shall belong to the person who filed an
application for such invention, or where two or more applications
are filed for the same invention, to the applicant who has the
earliest filing date or, the earliest priority date. [Sec. 29, IP Code]
Where two or more applications for the same invention made

separately and independently of each other have the same filing
date, on priority-date the patent will be issued jointly to the
applicants of all such applications.
Rule 305. Right of priority. An application for patent filed by any

person who has previously applied for the same invention in
another country which by treaty, convention, or law affords similar
privileges to Filipino citizens, shall be considered as filed as of the
date of filing of the foreign application: Provided, That: (a) the
local application expressly claims priority; (b) it is filed within
twelve (12) months from the date the earliest foreign application
was filed and (c) a certified copy of the foreign application together
with an English translation is filed within six (6) months from the
date of filing in the Philippines. [Sec. 31, IP Code]
This six (6) month-period may be extended by the Director for a

maximum of six (6) months upon showing of good cause or in
compliance with treaties to which the Philippines is or may become
a member.
Rule 306.1. Multiple priorities. An application can claim more

than one priority even from different countries. If more than one
patent priority is claimed, time limits computed from the priority
date will be based upon the earliest priority date.
Rule 306.2. If one or more priorities are claimed, the right

of priority shall cover only those elements of the application
which are included in the application or applications whose
priority is claimed.
Rule 306.3. If certain elements of the invention for which

priority is claimed do not appear among the claims
formulated in the previous application, priority may
nonetheless be granted, provided that the previous
application as a whole specifically disclose such elements.
Rule 306.4. Where an application could have claimed the

priority of an earlier application, but when filed, did not
contain such priority, the applicant shall be given two (2)
months from the filing date to submit priority claim.
Submission of priority claim after the filing of the application shall

be accompanied by a declaration of the applicant stating that the
delay in submitting the priority claim was unintentional.
Rule 307. Certified copy of the foreign applications. The certified

copy of foreign applications mentioned in Rule 302 shall be the
copy of the priority application(s) as duly certified to be a true or
faithful reproduction thereof by the Industrial Property Office
which received it or any other office which has official custody of
the foreign application.
PART 4
THE PATENT APPLICATION
Rule 400. The patent application. - An application for a patent shall

be in Filipino or English and shall be filed in writing either directly to
the Bureau or by post and must be addressed to the Director. The
application shall contain the following:
(a) A request for the grant of a patent;
(b) A description of the invention;
(c) Drawing(s) necessary for the understanding of the

invention;
(d) One or more claims; and
(e) An abstract.
Rule 401. Payment of fees. An application shall be subject to the

payment of the filing fee, the search fee and publication fee (1st
publication) within one (1) month after the filing date of the
application.
The application shall be deemed forfeited for non-payment of these

fees.
Rule 402. Marking of documents;

acknowledgment. The Bureau shall mark the documents
making up the application with the date of the receipt. After
receipt of the full payment of the required fees, the Bureau may
issue an acknowledgment stating the application number, name of
applicant and title of the invention.
Rule 403. Form of request; office application form. The request
shall be made on a form drawn up by the Office. For the
convenience of applicants, the Office shall draw up and make
available a standard application form which may be reproduced at
will by applicants and other persons at their own cost.

Intellectual Property Code of The Philippines: Rules and Regulations On Inventions

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Intellectual Property Code of The Philippines: Rules and Regulations On Inventions

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Intellectual Property Code of The Philippines: Rules and Regulations On Inventions

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Back to Top - Back to Home - Back to Main Index

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CODE

RULES AND REGULATIONS ON

RULES AND REGULATIONS

WHEREAS, the State recognizes that an effective industrial

WHEREAS, it is the policy of the State to streamline administrative

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the provisions of Republic Act No.

(a) “Bureau” means the Bureau of Patents of the Office;

(b) “Director” means the Director of the Bureau of Patents;

(c) “Director General” means the Head of the Intellectual Property

(d) “Examiner” means any officer or employee of the Bureau of

(f) “IPO Gazette” means the Intellectual Property Office’s own

(g) “Office” means the Intellectual Property Office; and

Rule 200. Patentable inventions. Any technical solution of a

c) or process or an improvement of any of the foregoing;

e) non-biological and microbiological processes. [Sec. 21, IP

Rule 202. Non-patentable inventions. The following shall be

(b) Schemes, rules and methods of performing mental acts,

(c) Methods for treatment of the human or animal body by

(d) Plant varieties or animal breeds or essentially biological

(e) Aesthetic creations; and

(f) Anything which is contrary to public order or morality. [Sec.

Rule 203. Novelty. An invention shall not be considered new if it

(b) The whole contents of an application for a patent, utility

Where two or more applications are independently filed with

Rule 205. Non-prejudicial disclosure. The disclosure of

(c) A third party which obtained the information directly or

For purposes of subsection (a), “inventor” also means any person

Rule 206. Inventive step. (a) An invention involves an

Rule 208. Industrial applicability. An invention which can

Rule 300. Right to a patent. The right to a patent belongs to the

Rule 301. Who may be named in an application as an

Rule 302. Inventions created pursuant to a commission. The

Rule 303. Inventions made in the course of employment. In case

(b) The employer, if the invention is the result of the

Where two or more applications for the same invention made

Rule 305. Right of priority. An application for patent filed by any

This six (6) month-period may be extended by the Director for a

Rule 306.1. Multiple priorities. An application can claim more

Rule 306.2. If one or more priorities are claimed, the right

Rule 306.3. If certain elements of the invention for which

Rule 306.4. Where an application could have claimed the

Submission of priority claim after the filing of the application shall

Rule 307. Certified copy of the foreign applications. The certified

THE PATENT APPLICATION

Rule 400. The patent application. - An application for a patent shall

(b) A description of the invention;

(c) Drawing(s) necessary for the understanding of the

(d) One or more claims; and

Rule 401. Payment of fees. An application shall be subject to the

The application shall be deemed forfeited for non-payment of these

Rule 402. Marking of documents;

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.