Theories: Unit 13 Traditional
Theories: Unit 13 Traditional
Theories: Unit 13 Traditional
[ Structure
13.0 Objectives
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Types of Unemployment
I
13.3 Classical View on Unemployment
I 13.4 Keynesian view on Unemployment
13.5 Phillips Curve
13.6 Costs of Unemployment and Inflation
I 13.7 Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment (NAIRU)
I 13.8 Let Us Sum Up
I
I
13.9 Key Words
I
13.10 Some Useful Books
t 13.11 Answers1 Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises
I
I
13.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit you should be able to:
identify different types of unemployment;
1 explain the classical and Keynesian views on unemployment;
b
13.1 INTRODUCTION
Labour is demanded by firms as it contributes to production of goods and
services. In return of its contribution, labour is rewarded with wages. In the
market for labour the wage rate is determined at a level where supply of and
demand for labour are equal. While human beings supply more labour at higher
wage rate, firms demand lower quantity of labour when wage rate is high. Thus
supply of labour has a positive relationship with wage rate (implying upward
sloping supply curve) while demand for labour has a negative relationship with
wage rate (implying downward sloping demand curve).
A fact that has perturbed everyone, no less economists, is that total labour force
is not fully employed at the prevailing wage rate. Certain percentage, which
fluctuates over time, of the labour force remains unemployed at.any point of
time. The nature of and the reasons behind unemployment in the economy have
been put to much debate in economics. Economists have come up with varied
explanations of unemployment, which we will consider in this unit.
L I w
0 L* labour
Fig. 13.1: Equilibrium Level of Employment
In Fig. 13.1 we measure real wage rate (w) on y-axis and quantity of labour (L)
on x-axis. The equilibrium wage rate reached through interaction of supply of
6
-
labour (L,) and demand for labour (Ld) is W* and quantity of labour employed is 'raditional Theorks
L*, which represents full employment.
As we learnt in Unit 1, the aggregate supply curve according to classical
economists is a vertical straight line at the full employment output level. At the
equilibrium wage rate everyone seeking employment gets engaged. If the wage
rate is above w (see Fig. 13.1) there is excess supply of labour compared to its
demand. In their efforts to get employed some of the currently unemployed
workers will be willing to work at a wage lower than the prevailing one and in
the process will bring down the wage rate till it reaches w*. On the other hand,
when wage rate is below w* there will be excess demand compared to supply.
Due to shortage of labour firms will compete with each other and will be willing
to pay higher wage, as a result of which wage rate will increase. Remember that
classical economists were concerned with real wage in the economy, which is
W
defined as the ratio of nominal wage (W)to price level (P) such that w = -.
P
Thus flexibility in real wage assured that a rise in price level is accompanied by
a proportionate rise in nominal wage. In fact the dichotomy between real and
monetary sectors of the economy, as envisaged in classical model, ensures such
proportional changes. The classical economists did not rule out the possibility of
decrease in nominal wage rate. Nonetheless, it was always in response to
decrease in money supply and price level.
In theory, the classical model appears to have a sound base. When compared
with reality, however, it does not explain the obvious phenomenon of
unemployment in the economy. As we will see below, there is much rigidity in
the economy, which does not allow smooth and instantaneous changes in wage
rate. Moreover, some amount of frictional unemployment is always present in
an economy as workers switch over from one job to another. The neoclassical
economists recognized the limitations of classical model and made amendments
to the classical position of zero unemployment. They assumed that the economy
in normal times has certain minimum unemployment called 'natural rate of
unemployment'.
PHILLIPS CURVE
The Phillips curve, named after A. W. Phillips, describes the relationship
between unemployment and inflation. In 1958 Phillips, then professor at
London School of Economics, took time series data on the rate of
unemployment and the rate of increase in nominal wage rate for the United
Kingdom for the period 1861-1957 and attempted to e'stablish a relationship. He
took a simple linear equation of the following form:
where w is the rate of wage increase, a and b are constants and u is the rate of
unemployment. He found that there exists an inverse relationship between w
and u, with the implication that lower rate of unemployment is associated with
higher rate of wage increase. The policy implication of such a result was
astounding - an economy cannot have both low inflation and low
unemployment simultaneously. In order to contain unemployment an economy
has to tolerate a higher rate of wage increase and vice versa.
Subsequent to the publication of the results by Phillips, economists followed
suit and attempted similar exercises for other countries. Some of the studies
carried out refinements to the simple equation estimated by Phillips such as the
use of inflation (the rate of increase in prices) instead of wage rate increase. 1n/
many cases the scatter of plot of variables appeared to be a curve, convex to the/
origin. As empirical studies reinforced the inverse relationship between the rate:
of inflation and the rate of unemployment the Phillips curve soon became an:
important tool of policy analysis. The prescription was clear: during periods of?
high unemployment the government should follow an expansionary monetary
policy which leaves more money in the hands of people. It may accelerate the
rate of inflation while lowering unemployment.
During 1970s economists encountered a puzzle in the sense that inflation and
unemployment data did not fit into the Phillips curve for many developed
economies. In fact many countries witnessed 'stagflation' - a combination of
stagnation (a situation of high unemployment) and high inflation. The instability
in the Phillips curve prompted economists to look into the possible reason of
high inflation in spite of high unemployment in the economy.
A limitation of the Phillips curve is that both workers and employers take
decisions on the basis of real wage, not nominal wage. As we mentioned earlier
when we enter into a contract on a hture date we incorporate expected inflation
into it. Milton Friedman and Edmund Pheips suggested that since real wage is
what matters, the change in nominal wage has to be corrected by inflationary
expectations. In the short-run the Phillips curve is stable but in the long run it
shifts from one level to another, which makes the long run. Phillips curve a
vertical-straight line. We explain the process through which shifts in Phillips
curve takes place in Fig. 13.4.